[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 97 (Friday, May 21, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27513-27518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10747]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

19 CFR Part 361

[Docket No. 210512-0104]
RIN 0625-AB18


Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System: Effective Date 
and Response to Comments

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Final rule; response to comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) is confirming the 
stay of the regulations entitled ``Aluminum Import Monitoring and 
Analysis System'' will be lifted on June 28, 2021. Commerce is also 
addressing the additional public comments received regarding the final 
rule. Finally, Commerce is also confirming that compliance with its 
regulations regarding the Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis (AIM) 
system, except for certain sections, will take effect on June 28, 2021 
and is extending the temporary delay for compliance with the remaining 
sections its regulations from December 23, 2021 to June 28, 2022.

DATES: 
    Effective date: This document is effective on June 28, 2021.
    Compliance dates: Compliance with 19 CFR part 361 (except for Sec.  
361.103(c)(3)(i)(C) and (c)(3)(ii)(C)) is required on June 28, 2021. 
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for more information. Section 
361.103(c)(3)(i)(C) and (c)(3)(ii)(C) allow filers to state ``unknown'' 
for certain fields on the license application on a temporary basis 
through June 28, 2022. As of June 29, 2022, filers will no longer be 
able to state ``unknown'' and will be required to provide the requested 
information for these fields.

ADDRESSES: The AIM system website is https://www.trade.gov/aluminum. 
Through this website, potential license applicants can register for the 
online license application platform and apply for licenses. 
Additionally, the public AIM monitor is featured on this website. 
Commerce released the public AIM monitor using publicly available data 
through this website on March 29, 2021.
    More information can be found in the final rule, on the AIM system 
website, and at https://www.trade.gov/updates-aluminum-import-licensing. Commerce is offering virtual demonstrations of the online 
license application platform for potential license applicants. Commerce 
is also offering a virtual demonstration of the public AIM monitor, 
which is available to the general public. Although the demonstrations 
will be completely virtual, Commerce will have a limited number of 
spots available for participation in the demonstrations. For specific 
dates and times of the demonstrations, and to participate in the 
demonstrations, please visit the AIM system website or https://www.trade.gov/updates-aluminum-import-licensing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Al-Saadawi at (202) 482-1930 or 
Jessica Link at (202) 482-1411, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 29, 2020, Commerce published a proposed rule for the 
establishment of the AIM system in 19 CFR part 361.\1\ On December 23, 
2020, Commerce published ``Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis 
System,'' (Final Rule), addressing 17 comments on the Proposed Rule and 
establishing the AIM system in 19 CFR part 361 that would be comprised 
of an aluminum import licensing program and a public AIM monitor, 
available through the AIM system website.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System Proposed 
Rule, 85 FR 23748 (April 29, 2020) (Proposed Rule).
    \2\ Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System, 85 FR 83804 
(December 23, 2020) (Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in the Final Rule, the AIM system requires importers, 
customs brokers or their agents to apply for and obtain an import 
license for each entry of certain aluminum products into the United 
States through the AIM system website; requires license applicants to 
identify, among other requirements, the country or countries where the 
largest and the second largest volume of primary aluminum used in the 
manufacture of the imported aluminum product was smelted (subject to 
certain exceptions) and the country where the aluminum product was most 
recently cast; requires license applicants to report their license 
numbers on their entry summary documentation, or electronic equivalent, 
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP); allows for the public 
release of certain import license data on an aggregate basis, as 
appropriate, on the public AIM monitor; and applies the license 
requirement to all imports of basic aluminum products. The goal of the 
AIM system is to allow for the effective and timely monitoring of 
import surges of specific aluminum

[[Page 27514]]

products and to aid in the prevention of transshipment of aluminum 
products. Modeled after the similar Steel Import Monitoring and 
Analysis (SIMA) system,\3\ the AIM system is established pursuant to 
the Secretary's authority under the Census Act, as amended (13 U.S.C. 
301(a) and 302). The responsibility for administering the AIM system is 
delegated to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System, Final Rule, 
70 FR 72373 (December 5, 2005); Modification of Regulations 
Regarding the Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System, 85 FR 
56162 (September 11, 2020) (SIMA Modification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The original effective date for the Final Rule and part 361 was 
January 25, 2021, meaning that license numbers would be required to be 
reported to CBP on entry summary documentation, or electronic 
equivalent, for covered aluminum products on or after this date. On 
January 4, 2021, Commerce launched the AIM system website and allowed 
for importers, customs brokers and their agents to begin applying for 
and obtaining their import licenses.
    On January 22, 2021, Commerce announced that it was delaying the 
effective date of the Final Rule and part 361 until March 29, 2021.\4\ 
In the Delay of Effective Date Notification, published on January 27, 
2021, Commerce also opened a 30-day comment period to solicit public 
comment on all aspects of the Final Rule, the AIM system, and part 361. 
The comment period closed on February 26, 2021. Commerce received four 
comments, addressed below.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System: Delay of 
Effective Date, 86 FR 7237 (January 27, 2021) (Delay of Effective 
Date Notification).
    \5\ These comments can be found by searching for the Final Rule 
(Docket No. ITA-2021-0001) on the Federal eRulemaking portal at 
http://www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 29, 2021, Commerce announced that it was delaying 
compliance with most aspects of the Final Rule and part 361 by an 
additional ninety days, by staying part 361.\6\ In the Stay and Delay 
of Compliance Date Notification, published on April 1, 2021, Commerce 
explained that the delay would allow Commerce time to finalize the 
license application system and to provide both the public and CBP with 
sufficient advance notice of the new compliance date. Commerce also 
explained that the delay would allow Commerce to consider and respond, 
as appropriate, to the comments received during the January 27, 2021 to 
February 26, 2021 comment period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Aluminum Import Monitoring and Analysis System: Stay and 
Delay of Compliance Date, 86 FR 17058 (April 1, 2021) (Stay and 
Delay of Compliance Date Notification).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although Commerce delayed compliance with most aspects of the Final 
Rule and part 361, Commerce released the public AIM monitor on the AIM 
system website on March 29, 2021. The public AIM monitor provides 
information on U.S. imports of aluminum from all countries by broad 
product categories in both value and volume measures. The public AIM 
monitor currently only includes publicly available import data, as the 
license information is not yet available. Once the license collection 
begins after June 28, 2021, and Commerce has sufficient time to review 
the license data, the public AIM monitor will report certain aggregate 
information on imports of covered aluminum product categories using 
both publicly available import data and data obtained from the aluminum 
licenses.
    With this document, Commerce confirms that compliance with most 
aspects of the Final Rule and part 361 will be required on June 28, 
2021. Specifically, licenses will be required for all covered aluminum 
imports and must be reported to CBP on entry summary documentation, or 
electronic equivalent, on or after this date. Additionally, the 
remaining portions of the regulations concerning the removal of the 
option to state ``unknown'' for certain fields on the aluminum license 
form will now be effective on June 29, 2022, as discussed below, and as 
stated in the relevant sections of part 361.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ For further background and information, see the Final Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the AIM system website is operational and 
potential license applicants may obtain their user identification 
numbers and apply for and obtain licenses at any time. Potential 
license applicants are encouraged to obtain user identification numbers 
and familiarize themselves with the system. Any licenses that were 
issued prior to June 28, 2021 and are less than 75 days old can be used 
for covered aluminum imports on or after June 28, 2021. Any licenses 
that were issued prior to June 28, 2021 and have expired (i.e., 
licenses issued prior to April 14, 2021), may be disregarded. If 
parties are unsure whether a previously issued license has expired, the 
party may cancel the previous license and obtain a new one. There is no 
penalty for unused or canceled licenses. Commerce also requests that 
parties cancel licenses that will not be used.
    Lastly, because the AIM system is a new program, Commerce will seek 
additional comment from the public on potential improvements or changes 
to the system in a subsequent document after the AIM system is in 
place. Parties will have the opportunity to provide further comment on 
any issue discussed herein or any related topic at that time.

Explanation of Changes From the Final Rule

    The AIM system and part 361 are unchanged from the Final Rule, 
except that, as explained below, Commerce is extending the period for 
license applicants to state ``unknown'' for certain fields on the 
license application on a temporary basis. This period, originally set 
to expire on December 23, 2021, is now extended to June 28, 2022.
    Section 361.103, covering the automatic issuance of import 
licenses, provides that aluminum import licenses will be issued to 
registered importers, customs brokers, or their agents through an 
automatic aluminum import licensing system. In order to obtain the 
license, the applicant (also referred to as the filer) must report the 
information identified under Sec.  361.103(c)(1) in the fields of the 
license application form. As described in the Final Rule and as stated 
in Sec.  361.103(c)(1)(xiii), (xiv), and (xv), among other 
requirements, Commerce requires the applicant to provide the following 
information in three separate fields: (1) The country where the largest 
volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported 
aluminum product was smelted (referred to as ``country of smelt for the 
largest volume of primary aluminum'' or ``country of smelt'' as 
shorthand), (2) the country where the second largest volume of primary 
aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported aluminum product was 
smelted (referred to as ``country of smelt for the second largest 
volume of primary aluminum'' or ``country of smelt'' as shorthand), and 
(3) the country where the aluminum used in the imported aluminum 
product was most recently cast (referred to as ``country of most recent 
cast'' for shorthand). These fields are further described under Sec.  
361.103(c)(3).
    Section 361.103(c)(3)(i)(A) defines the field for the country of 
smelt for the largest volume of primary aluminum as the country where 
the largest volume of new aluminum metal is produced from alumina (or 
aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult process. 
Recognizing that importers may have some initial difficulties in 
securing this information, Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(i)(C) allows filers to 
state ``unknown'' for this field on the license application on a 
temporary basis. Similar to the country of smelt for the largest volume 
of

[[Page 27515]]

primary aluminum field, Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(ii)(A) defines the field 
for the country of smelt for the second largest volume of primary 
aluminum as the country where the second largest volume of new aluminum 
metal is produced from alumina (or aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic 
Hall-H[eacute]roult process. Section 361.103(c)(3)(ii)(C) allows filers 
to state ``unknown'' in this field on a temporary basis.
    In this document, Commerce is now extending the temporary period 
(originally set to expire on December 23, 2021) to allow for license 
applicants to state ``unknown'' in the fields for country(ies) of smelt 
for the largest and second largest volume of primary aluminum until 
June 28, 2022. Commerce will begin requiring the requested information 
for these fields for license applications on or after June 29, 2022, 
meaning that filers may no longer state ``unknown'' for these fields 
after that date. Section 361.103(c)(3)(i)(C) and (c)(3)(ii)(C) have 
been modified to reflect these changes.

Response to Comments Received on the Final Rule

    Commerce received four comments on the final rule in response to 
the Delay of Effective Date Notification. In general, all commenters 
were supportive of the AIM system, which they believe will help provide 
additional tools for ensuring a fair and competitive U.S. marketplace 
for aluminum products. The commenters also stated that a robust 
aluminum monitoring program to effectively and accurately track imports 
will benefit domestic aluminum companies by helping government 
officials and industry stakeholders identify trends in trade flows and 
address aluminum misclassification, transshipment, and evasion of 
duties. Commerce is thankful for the comments in support and looks 
forward to an efficient and expeditious roll-out of the AIM system.
    Each of the commenters raised specific comments seeking 
clarification or improvement on some aspects of the AIM system. Below 
is a summary of the comments, grouped by issue category, followed by 
Commerce's response.

1. Country(ies) of Smelt and Country of Most Recent Cast Reporting 
Requirements

a. Clarification of Reporting Requirements
    All four commenters generally sought further clarifications 
regarding the reporting requirements for the license fields for the 
country(ies) of smelt for the largest and second largest volume of 
primary aluminum and country of most recent cast.
    First, some commenters reiterated comments previously raised in 
response to the Proposed Rule regarding the reference ``country of 
pouring'' instead of ``country of most recent cast'' as was adopted in 
the Final Rule.
    Second, one commenter requested confirmation that the AIM system 
and aluminum licensing requirements only apply to imported aluminum 
products.
    Third, one commenter argued that Commerce must track the origin of 
primary and secondary aluminum used in semi-finished products. Another 
commenter also argued that Commerce should be tracking the source of 
primary aluminum used in downstream aluminum products.
    Fourth, one commenter requested that Commerce clarify that 
country(ies) of smelt information can be tracked and reported using 
traditional inventory management methods (recognized under Generally 
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)).
    Fifth, one commenter argued that Commerce should require the 
identification of the manufacturer of the aluminum, rather than 
permitting parties to state ``unknown'' for this field on the license 
form. This commenter states that aluminum products are always tagged to 
identify the manufacturer, so the U.S. importer will always know this 
information. Therefore, this commenter argues that there is no need for 
leeway in identifying the aluminum manufacturer.
    Sixth, one commenter requested that country of smelt information 
not be required to be reported in defined situations where there is no 
risk of circumvention; where the burdens and costs related to tracking 
smelt details on a coil- or unit-specific basis are not justified; and 
where the collection of country of smelt information will not add any 
material insight to the trade in aluminum. This commenter provided two 
examples. First, for products that are hot-rolled in the United States, 
exported for further processing or manufacturing that did not include 
additional hot-rolling, and then re-imported back into the United 
States, the commenter explained that under the United States-Canada-
Mexico Agreement (USMCA), such goods retain their U.S. origin and need 
not follow the requirements of the U.S. Goods Returned procedures under 
Chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS). The commenter argues that to impose coil-specific smelt-
country tracking obligations on such goods that have been hot-rolled in 
the United States (when U.S. manufacturing has already transformed a 
downstream aluminum product that is several steps removed from smelting 
operations) would run counter to Commerce's policy of promoting U.S. 
manufacturing. In addition, the commenter states that requiring such 
tracking would in turn require significant investment of resources that 
will affect prices or require U.S. manufacturers to opt not to provide 
smelt certifications to their foreign customers. Second, this commentor 
also suggested that country of smelt information not be required if 
inputs other than primary-smelted aluminum account for 80 percent or 
more of the metal content of the aluminum product.
    Response: With respect to the first issue raised, as explained in 
the Final Rule and as noted above, pursuant to Sec.  
361.103(c)(1)(xiii), (xiv), and (xv) Commerce will require the aluminum 
import license applicant to provide information in three separate 
fields: (1) The country where the largest volume of primary aluminum 
used in the manufacture of the imported aluminum product was smelted 
(referred to as ``country of smelt for the largest volume of primary 
aluminum'' as shorthand), (2) the country where the second largest 
volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported 
aluminum product was smelted (referred to as ``country of smelt for the 
second largest volume of primary aluminum'' as shorthand), and (3) the 
country where the aluminum used in the imported aluminum product was 
most recently cast (referred to as ``country of most recent cast'' for 
shorthand). As discussed in the Final Rule, Commerce has codified 
detailed definitions of these terms in Sec.  361.103(c)(3). Commerce 
recognizes that use of the phrase ``country of pouring'' in the 
Proposed Rule did not accurately reflect terminology utilized in the 
aluminum industry and may have caused some confusion. Therefore, this 
term is not used in the Final Rule. Instead, Commerce refers to the 
``country of most recent cast.'' This is explained in the Final Rule, 
85 FR at 83809-10, and further defined in Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(iii).
    On the second issue raised, Commerce confirms that licenses are 
only required for imported covered aluminum products coming into the 
United States. Specifically, as explained in the Final Rule and Sec.  
361.101(b), licenses will be required for imports of basic aluminum 
products that are entered, or withdrawn for consumption from a bonded 
warehouse, into the commerce of the United States under

[[Page 27516]]

the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes: 7601, 7604, 7605, 
7606, 7607, 7608, 7609, 7616.99.51.60, and 7616.99.51.70.\8\ An 
aluminum import license will be required for every entry of covered 
aluminum products under these HTS codes, regardless of origin. However, 
as described in Sec.  361.101(c), (d), and (e), entries from foreign 
trade zones into the commerce of the United States; temporary import 
bond (TIB) entries; transportation & exportation (T&E) entries; entries 
into a bonded warehouse; and informal entries, are exempt from the 
license requirement.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As discussed in Sec.  361.101(a)(1), a list of the products 
covered by the AIM system by HTS codes can be obtained on the AIM 
system website. The HTS codes, which are maintained by the U.S. 
International Trade Commission (ITC), may be updated periodically to 
reflect revisions to the codes.
    \9\ See Final Rule, 85 FR at 83808-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On the third issue raised, tracking the origin of primary and 
secondary aluminum used in semi-finished products and tracking the 
source of primary aluminum used in downstream aluminum products, we 
clarify the following. The ``product'' that is imported will be 
classified under one of the HTS codes identified above and may take the 
form of either a semi-finished product (slab, billets, or ingots) or a 
finished aluminum product. This is the ``final solid state'' of the 
product upon importation.
    Therefore, the field in the license application requiring 
identification of the country where the largest volume of primary 
aluminum used in the manufacture of the imported product (either a 
semi-finished or finished product) was smelted applies to the country 
where the largest volume of new aluminum metal is produced from alumina 
(or aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic Hall-H[eacute]roult process 
(see Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(i)(A)).\10\ Likewise, the field in the license 
application requiring identification of the country where the second 
largest volume of primary aluminum used in the manufacture of the 
imported product (either semi-finished or finished product) was smelted 
applies to the country where the second largest volume of new aluminum 
metal is produced from alumina (or aluminum oxide) by the electrolytic 
Hall-H[eacute]roult process (see Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(ii)(A)).\11\ And 
the field in the license application requiring identification of the 
country where the imported product (either semi-finished or finished 
product) was most recently cast applies to the country where the 
aluminum (with or without alloying elements) was last liquified by heat 
and cast into a solid state (see Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(iii)(A)).\12\ As 
noted above, this final solid state can take the form of either a semi-
finished product (slab, billets or ingots) or a finished aluminum 
product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In accordance with Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(i)(B), filers may 
state ``not applicable'' for this field if the product contains only 
secondary aluminum and no primary aluminum. Secondary aluminum is 
defined as aluminum metal that is produced from recycled aluminum 
scrap through a re-melting process. As explained in this document 
and Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(i)(C), filers may state ``unknown'' for this 
field for license applications up to June 28, 2022.
    \11\ In accordance with Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(ii)(B), filers may 
state ``not applicable'' for this field if the product contains only 
secondary aluminum and no primary aluminum. Secondary aluminum is 
defined as aluminum metal that is produced from recycled aluminum 
scrap through a re-melting process. As explained in this document 
and Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(ii)(C), filers may state ``unknown'' for 
this field for license applications up to June 28, 2022.
    \12\ In accordance with Sec.  361.103(c)(3)(iii)(B) and (C), 
filers may not state ``not applicable'' or ``unknown'' for this 
field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, to maximize the benefits of import monitoring for the full 
value chain of the U.S. aluminum industry, Commerce is requiring that 
license applicants identify the country where primary aluminum inputs 
for imported aluminum products were smelted and the country where 
intermediate processing or casting of semi-finished or finished 
products occurred. Tracking this information will be valuable in 
understanding supply chain developments and trade distortions with data 
released through the public AIM monitor. Commerce also recognizes that 
imported aluminum products may only contain one source of primary 
aluminum or may be comprised partially or entirely of secondary 
aluminum. Consequently, Commerce allows users to state that the 
country(ies) of smelt fields are ``not applicable'' in these cases. 
Commerce understands that secondary aluminum can be recycled and 
remelted endlessly and is not attempting to track secondary inputs.
    However, as discussed in the Final Rule, the country of most recent 
cast is information that generally is readily available to the importer 
or its broker and is most likely to be identified in the import 
documentation accompanying the entry summary to be filed with CBP 
(invoices, lab reports, etc.). In some instances, the country of most 
recent cast may be identified as the country of origin. Further, 
because a semi-finished or finished aluminum product could go through 
the casting process multiple times before importation into the United 
States, the field only requests the country of most recent cast. For 
these reasons, filers may not state ``not applicable'' or ``unknown'' 
for this field.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Final Rule, 85 FR at 83809-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On the fourth issue raised, Commerce does not require filers to 
track and report country(ies) of smelt information using any particular 
inventory management method. As with all other reported information in 
licenses, applicants are expected to certify that the information is 
accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge.\14\ The manner in 
which parties track information or maintain internal records to ensure 
accuracy and completeness in their reporting is left up to parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Sample license forms can be found at https://www.trade.gov/updates-aluminum-import-licensing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On the fifth issue raised, the AIM system will also allow for 
license applicants to indicate that the manufacturer is ``unknown.'' 
While the option of identifying the manufacturer as unknown is 
permitted, Commerce does require license applicants certify that they 
have provided information that is accurate and complete to the best of 
their knowledge and, accordingly, expects applicants to identify the 
manufacturer if known. Additionally, Commerce notes that manufacturer 
information is not released publicly. The public AIM monitor only 
releases aggregated import data that does not include business 
proprietary information or information that could be used to identify 
license applicants.
    On the sixth issue raised, we are not accepting the commenter's 
request that we exempt certain types of entries from the country(ies) 
of smelt reporting requirement. The commenter argues that in certain 
situations such information should not be requested because there is no 
risk of circumvention; the burdens and costs related to tracking smelt 
details on a coil- or unit-specific basis are not justified; and the 
collection of country of smelt information will not add any material 
insight to the trade in aluminum. This commenter provided two 
examples--entries of hot-rolled coil smelted in the United States, 
further processed abroad, and returned under the U.S. Good Returned 
program and entries where the non-primary aluminum makes up 80 percent 
or more of the aluminum in the product.
    As an initial matter, these comments have been raised for the first 
time in response to the Final Rule, and no other commenter has had an 
opportunity to consider these exemption requests. Therefore, it would 
not be appropriate to adopt these exemptions at this time,

[[Page 27517]]

without the benefit of additional party comments. With that, we 
encourage parties to consider these issues in the next request for 
comments on the AIM system.
    More generally, we disagree that tracking these types of entries 
will provide no material insight into the aluminum trade. As has been 
our experience with SIMA, tracking products with different origin, 
including U.S. origin, along with products with other origins, is an 
important function of the monitor and will assist both the trade and 
Commerce in viewing trends on a near real-time basis. Additionally, 
tracking potential circumvention trends is not the only purpose for 
which Commerce is adopting the AIM system. Further, as explained in the 
Final Rule, Commerce recognizes that there may be some amount of burden 
to parties, who may not currently track country(ies) of smelt 
information in the normal course of business. To help alleviate any 
concerns, Commerce is allowing parties additional time to track this 
information, extending the temporary period to report ``unknown'' for 
these fields to June 28, 2022, as explained in this document.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Final Rule, 85 FR at 83810.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We reiterate that, as discussed in the Final Rule, after the AIM 
system is in place, Commerce will seek additional comments from parties 
on potential improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent 
document. Parties may further comment on these issues, or any issues 
with the AIM system, at that time.
b. Delayed Collection of Country of Smelt Information
    One commenter requested that the requirement to report the country 
of smelt and country of second largest smelt be delayed for an 
additional year beyond the original effective date of December 24, 
2021. This commenter noted that the requirement to identify the country 
or countries where primary aluminum used in the manufacture of aluminum 
products was smelted was not made clear in the Proposed Rule. This 
commenter further explained that this new data field requirement is not 
currently captured in their existing systems that are used to manage 
and track all purchases. While this system does track country of origin 
it is not tied to country of smelt information and tracking it 
correctly will require substantial reprogramming for the party. To 
avoid imposing an undue burden, this commenter consequently requested 
that Commerce delay the reporting requirement for an additional year.
    Response: As stated above in the Explanation of Changes from the 
Final Rule section, Commerce is granting the commenter's request, in 
part, and will allow license applicants to continue to state 
``unknown'' for the country of largest smelt and country of second 
largest smelt license fields until June 28, 2022. Commerce recognizes 
that importers may have initial difficulty in securing the information 
necessary to complete the fields for the country of smelt for the 
largest and second largest volume of primary aluminum. As such, 
Commerce will allow filers to state ``unknown'' in these fields on a 
temporary basis. Specifically, ``unknown'' may be stated for a period 
of one year from the beginning of compliance with the Final Rule (i.e., 
up to June 28, 2022) to enable license applicants sufficient time to 
gather the requisite information. Effective one year from the beginning 
of compliance of the Final Rule, June 29, 2022, filers will no longer 
be able to state ``unknown'' and will be required to provide the 
requested information for this field.
    This places importers on notice that they need to start collecting 
the necessary documentation that tracks this information within their 
supply chains. It will also allow the AIM system to be launched 
expeditiously while providing importers an adjustment period to start 
collecting this information.

2. Expanding the Scope of AIM Program

    One commenter requested that Commerce consider expanding the scope 
of the AIM licensing program to include all products classifiable of 
Chapter 76 of the harmonized tariff schedule.
    Response: The AIM system will not require import license for 
aluminum products other than those covered in the Final Rule. However, 
Commerce has considered the commenter's assertion that collecting data 
on all aluminum products will support the entire aluminum industry. 
Accordingly, as discussed in the Final Rule, after the AIM system is in 
place, Commerce will seek additional comment from parties on potential 
improvements or changes to the system in a subsequent document. Parties 
may comment on the inclusion of these products in the AIM system's 
import license requirement at that time. Furthermore, at the sub-
regulatory level, Commerce will consider adding additional product 
groups to the public AIM monitor, beyond the HTS categories covered by 
the license requirement, which will be based only on publicly available 
import data. This would be done in a similar manner as the inclusion of 
aluminum scrap data in the public AIM monitor.

3. Further Documentation and Additional Requirements

    One commenter requested that Commerce require submission of mill 
test certificates for various inputs consumed at every stage of 
production of aluminum products. The commenter stated that this 
documentation is readily available and should be required with every 
shipment to verify the location of production and protect against 
evasion. Another commenter argued that, to inhibit transshipment, the 
AIM system should require submission of licenses and supporting 
documentation to CBP, not simply the license number.
    Response: As explained in the Final Rule, Commerce will not adopt 
these proposals at this time. Although these suggestions have merit and 
warrant further consideration, adopting them at this time would create 
additional burdens on which the public has not had an opportunity to 
comment. In addition, some of these suggestions would necessitate 
further inter-agency consultation and coordination, which has not been 
considered for purposes of this rulemaking. Thus, there is no 
requirement to present physical copies of the license forms or any 
other documentation at the time of entry summary. However, documents 
must be maintained in accordance with CBP's normal requirements.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Id., 85 FR at 83811.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we recognize that the AIM system is modeled on the 
SIMA system, and CBP requires steel importers to provide mill test 
certificates for steel imports.\17\ While CBP could be asked to 
consider requiring the collection of mill test certificates for covered 
aluminum products in the future, as they currently do for steel, that 
requirement is outside of the scope of this rulemaking. That said, as 
discussed above, after the AIM system is in place, Commerce will seek 
additional comment from parties on potential improvements or changes to 
the system in a subsequent document. Parties may further comment on 
these issues at that time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See SIMA Modification, 85 FR at 56166 (``[T]he mill test 
certification is currently required by CBP for entry purposes, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 141.89 and 142.6, and Commerce expects that 
the mill test certification would be included with the standard 
sales documentation for steel mill imports and therefore would be 
readily available to the importer.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Bonded Warehouses

    One commenter requested that the AIM system should require licenses 
for

[[Page 27518]]

bonded warehouses and remove the exemption in Sec.  306.101(e) that 
only requires a license for goods that are withdrawn from the warehouse 
for consumption.
    Response: This comment was raised in response to the Proposed Rule 
and Commerce addressed it in the Final Rule. We have not reconsidered 
our position from the Final Rule that Commerce will not require users 
to obtain aluminum import licenses for entry into bonded warehouses. As 
explained in the Final Rule, only entries of covered aluminum products 
withdrawn for consumption from bonded warehouses will require a license 
at the entry summary. Entry into bonded warehouses does not constitute 
an entry for consumption as provided in Sec.  361.101(b) and (e), and 
some of the aluminum could subsequently be re-exported from bonded 
warehouses. Additionally, Commerce also finds that including these 
shipments in the aluminum license data would likely overestimate 
monthly imports of aluminum for consumption. Furthermore, this would 
require users to obtain two separate licenses for importation into 
bonded warehouses and importation into consumption. This would increase 
the public burden and further reduce the accuracy of AIM licenses 
because the system would double-count these licenses.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Final Rule, 85 FR at 83812.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classifications

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this 
is a significant rulemaking under Executive Order 12866, but it is not 
economically significant.

Executive Order 13132

    This rulemaking does not contain policies with federalism 
implications as that term is defined in section 1(a) of Executive Order 
13132, dated August 4, 1999 (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999)).

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule contains a collection of information subject to the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 (PRA). The requirements 
have been approved by OMB.
    OMB Control Number: 0625-0279.
    Expiration: 1/31/2024.
    ITA Number: ITA-4142a (regular license); ITA-4142b (low-value 
license).
    Type of Review: Regular Submission.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Registered Users: 1,750.
    Estimated Time per Response: less than 10.5 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 48,749 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Costs: $0.00.
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to 
comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information 
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. As discussed above, after 
the AIM system is in place, Commerce will seek additional comment from 
parties on potential improvements or changes to the system in a 
subsequent document. Parties may further comment on this collection of 
information at that time.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce 
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration at the proposed rule stage that this rule if adopted, 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities as that term is defined in the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. (RFA). The factual basis for the 
certification is found in the Proposed Rule and Final Rule and is not 
repeated here. No comments were received on the certification or the 
economic impacts of this action. As a result, no final regulatory 
flexibility analysis is required, and none was prepared.

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 361

    Administrative practice and procedure, Aluminum, Business and 
industry, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 17, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Commerce 
amends 19 CFR part 361 as follows:

PART 361--ALUMINUM IMPORT MONITORING AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM


0
1. The authority citation for part 361 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  13 U.S.C. 301(a) and 302.


0
2. In Sec.  361.103, revise paragraphs (c)(3)(i)(C) and (c)(3)(ii)(C) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  351.103   Automatic issuance of import licenses.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) For license applications up to June 28, 2022, filers may state 
``unknown'' for this field. Effective June 29, 2022, filers may not 
state ``unknown'' for this field.
    (ii) * * *
    (C) For license applications up to June 28, 2022, filers may state 
``unknown'' for this field. Effective June 29, 2022, filers may not 
state ``unknown'' for this field.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-10747 Filed 5-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P