[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23932-23933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-909]


Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination 
of No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission, 2014-2015; Correction

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in 
the Federal Register of March 20, 2017 in which Commerce announced the 
final results of the 2014-2015 administrative review of the antidumping 
duty (AD) order on certain steel nails (nails) from the People's 
Republic of China (China). This notice contained incorrect information 
regarding the companies: For which Commerce rescinded the 
administrative review; for which Commerce made a final no shipments 
determination; and that Commerce assigned to the China-wide entity.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7425.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-05429, 
on page 14345, correct the first and second paragraph of the ``Final 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' section 
to read:

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of notice of initiation. Mid Continent Steel & Wire, 
Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its request for an administrative 
review on: Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Cana 
(Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; Certified Products 
International Inc.; Chiieh Yung Metal Industrial Corporation; China 
Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.; Huanghua Jinhai Hardware 
Products Co. Ltd; Huanghua Xiong Hua Hardware Product Co., Ltd.; 
Huanghua Yufutai Hardware Products Limited; Jining Huarong Hardware 
Products; Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Nanjing 
Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.; PT Enterprise Inc.; Shandong Oriental 
Cherry Hardware Group; Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Import & 
Export Co., Ltd.; Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co., 
Ltd.; Shanghai Yueda Fasterners Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Tianli Enterprise 
Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd.; Smart 
(Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Hongli 
Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Juxiang Metal 
Products Co.; Tianjin Lianda Group Ltd.\1\ Tianjin Zhonglian Metals 
Ware Co., Ltd.; and Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co., 
Ltd. No other party requested a review of these companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We note that ``Tianjin Lianda Group Co. Ltd.'' is subject to 
this review and is part of the China-wide entity.
    \2\ The petitioner withdrew its request for: Hebei Cangzhou New 
Century Foreign Trade Co. Ltd; Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd.; 
Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; and 
Tianjin Universal Machinery Import & Export Corp. However, these 
companies also self-requested a review. Therefore, we have not 
rescinded this review with respect to these four companies. The 
petitioner also withdrew its request for Mingguang Abundant Hardware 
Products Co., Ltd. However, in the Preliminary Results, we found 
Mingguang Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd. to be the same 
company as Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware Products Co., Ltd. because the 
company changed it English name. Because Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware 
Products Co., Ltd. self-requested a review, we have not rescinded 
this review with respect to the company(ies). Similarly, we find 
Qingdao D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC International Australia (PTY) Ltd. 
to be the same as Qingdao D&L Group Co., Ltd. and SDC International 
Aust. PTY. Ltd., respectively, which self-requested a review. 
Therefore, we have not rescinded this review with respect to Qingdao 
D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC International Aust. PTY. Ltd.


[[Page 23933]]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect 
to the companies identified above, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
    In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc 2017-05429, on 
page 14345, correct the first paragraph of the ``Final Determination of 
No Shipments'' section to read:

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined 
that Zhejian Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd. (Zhejian Gem-
Chun) did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\3\ 
Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice in non-market economy 
(NME) cases, we completed the review with respect to Zhejian Gem-
Chun. Based on the certifications submitted by Zhejian Gem-Chun, and 
our analysis of CBP information, we continue to determine that the 
company did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. As 
noted in the ``Assessment Rates'' section of the Final Results, 
Commerce intends to issue appropriate instructions to CBP for 
Zhejian Gem-Chun based on the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In the Final Results, Commerce inadvertently included Besco 
Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Jining Huarong Hardware 
Products, Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd., PT Enterprise Inc., 
and Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd. in the no shipments 
category. However, the petitioner made a timely request to rescind 
the review on these companies. Therefore, Commerce has removed these 
companies from the no shipments category.

    In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc 2017-05429, on 
page 14345, after the ``Final Determination of No Shipments'' section, 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
add section ``China-Wide Entity'' to read:

    In the Preliminary Results, we found that 14 companies, Cana 
(Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd., China Staple Enterprise 
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co. Ltd, 
Huanghua Xiong Hua Hardware Product Co., Ltd., Huanghua Yufutai 
Hardware Products Limited, Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co., 
Ltd., Mingguang Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Qingdao D&L 
Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co., 
Ltd., Shanghai Yueda Fasterners Co., Ltd., Shanxi Tianli Enterprise 
Co., Ltd., Smart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin 
Hongli Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Lianda 
Group Ltd., for which a review was requested had not established 
eligibility for a separate rate and, thus, we considered them to be 
part of the China-wide entity.
    However, this list was incorrect. Mingguang Abundant Hardware 
Products Co., Ltd., under its new name Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware 
Products Co., Ltd., and Qingdao D&L Group Co., Ltd., under Qingdao 
D&L Group Ltd., were granted separate rate status. For the remaining 
companies, except Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., Commerce has 
rescinded the review, as noted above.
    For the Final Results, we find that, for two companies, Suzhou 
Xingya Nail Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., we have 
not received any information since the issuance of the Preliminary 
Results that provides a basis for reconsidering this preliminary 
determination. Therefore, Commerce continues to find that Suzhou 
Xingya Nail Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd. are part of 
the China-wide entity.

Background

    On March 20, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register the 
final results of the 2014-2015 administrative reviews of the AD order 
on nails from China.\4\ This notice contained incorrect information 
regarding the companies for which Commerce: (1) Rescinded the 
administrative review; (2) made a final no shipments determination; and 
(3) assigned the entities to the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 
Determination of No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission; 2014-
2015, 82 FR 14344 (March 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

    Dated: April 29, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-09498 Filed 5-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P