[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 32 (Friday, February 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10174-10177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03097]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

 Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 202

[Docket No. 2017-8]


Secure Tests

AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is issuing an interim rule amending 
its regulations governing the registration of copyright claims in 
secure tests and secure test items in order to address a temporary 
disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The interim rule allows for 
examination of these claims via secure videoconference during the 
national emergency.

DATE:  Effective February 19, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and 
Associate Register of Copyrights, [email protected], or Robert J. 
Kasunic, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Registration 
Policy and Practice, [email protected]. They can be reached by 
telephone at 202-707-3000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under section 408 of the Copyright Act, the U.S. Copyright Office 
is responsible for registering copyright claims.\1\ In so doing, the 
Office is obligated to obtain a registration deposit that is sufficient 
to verify the claim and to provide an archival record of what was 
examined and registered.\2\ Deposits of unpublished material must be 
kept for the full term of copyright protection,\3\ and all deposits are 
available for public inspection.\4\ The Act, however, authorizes the 
Office to issue regulations establishing ``the nature of the copies . . 
. to be deposited'' in specific classes of works and to ``permit, for 
particular classes, the deposit of identifying material instead of 
copies or phonorecords.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 U.S.C. 408.
    \2\ Id. 408(b), 705(a).
    \3\ Id. 704(d).
    \4\ Id. 705(b).
    \5\ Id. 408(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to that authority, the Office has long provided special 
registration procedures for ``secure tests'' that require the 
maintenance of confidentiality of their contents. These tests include 
tests ``used in connection with admission to educational institutions, 
high school equivalency, placement in or credit for undergraduate and 
graduate course work, awarding of scholarships, and professional 
certification.'' \6\ Current regulations define a secure test as ``a 
nonmarketed test administered under supervision at specified centers on 
scheduled dates, all copies of which are accounted for and either 
destroyed or returned to restricted locked storage or secure electronic 
storage following each administration.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 42 FR 59302, 59304 & n.2 (Nov. 16, 1977); see also 43 FR 
763, 768 (Jan. 4, 1978) (adopting the definition of a secure test).
    \7\ 37 CFR 202.13(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 12, 2017, the Office issued an interim rule (the ``June 
2017 Interim Rule'') that memorialized certain aspects of its secure 
test procedure and adopted new processes to increase the efficiency of 
its examination of such works.\8\ Under this rule, applicants must, 
among other things, submit an online application, a redacted copy of 
the entire test, and a brief questionnaire about the test through the 
electronic registration system.\9\ This procedure allows the Office to 
prescreen an application to determine whether the work appears to be 
eligible for registration as a secure test. If the test appears to 
qualify, the Office will schedule an in-person appointment for 
examination of an unredacted copy of the test.\10\ All in-person 
appointments take place at the Copyright Office, located in Washington, 
DC, at the James Madison Memorial Building of the Library of Congress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 82 FR 26850 (June 12, 2017); see 37 CFR 202.13, 
202.20(b)(3), (c)(2)(vi) (implementing the June 2017 Interim Rule).
    \9\ 37 CFR 202.13(c)(2).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the in-person meeting, the examiner reviews the redacted and 
unredacted copies in a secure location in the presence of the applicant 
or its representative.\11\ If the examiner determines that the relevant 
legal and formal requirements have been met, he or she will register 
the claim(s) and add an annotation to the certificate reflecting that 
the work was examined under the secure test procedure. The registration 
is effective as of the date that the Office received--in proper form--
the application, filing fee, and the redacted copy that was uploaded to 
the electronic registration system.\12\ The June 2017 Interim Rule thus 
gives applicants the benefit of establishing as their effective date of 
registration the date when those redacted materials are initially 
submitted to, and received by, the Office electronically, rather than 
the later date when the in-person examination of the unredacted 
material takes place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The applicant must bring to the meeting, among other 
materials, a signed declaration confirming that the redacted copy 
brought to the meeting is identical to the redacted copy that was 
uploaded to the electronic registration system. Id. 
202.13(c)(3)(iv).
    \12\ 82 FR at 26853.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to concerns raised by stakeholders following the June 
2017 Interim Rule, the Office issued a second interim rule on November 
13, 2017 (the ``November 2017 Interim Rule'') to permit the 
registration of a group of test items (i.e., sets of questions and 
answers) stored in a database or test bank and used to create secure 
tests.\13\ For these claims, the November 2017 Interim Rule adopted 
most of the registration procedures that apply to secure tests under 
the June 2017 Interim Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 82 FR 52224 (Nov. 13, 2017). See 37 CFR 202.4(b), (k), 
202.13 (implementing the November 2017 Interim Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 8, 2020, the Office issued a third interim rule to address a 
disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (the ``May 2020 Interim 
Rule'').\14\ Specifically, certain tests that normally would qualify 
for registration as secure tests could be rendered ineligible for this 
option, because they were being administered remotely rather than at 
specified testing centers due to pandemic-related restrictions. The 
interim rule amended the definition of a ``secure test'' to allow 
otherwise-eligible tests currently being administered online during the 
national emergency to qualify as secure tests, provided the test 
administrator employed sufficient security measures.\15\ The rule did 
not specify particular measures required to meet this standard, in 
order to afford applicants flexibility to tailor such processes to 
their specific needs. The Office noted that the rule did not alter the 
requirement that a secure test be administered ``under supervision,'' 
meaning that ``test proctors or the equivalent supervise the 
administration of the test.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 85 FR 27296 (May 8, 2020). See 37 CFR 202.13(b)(1) 
(implementing the May 2020 Interim Rule).
    \15\ 37 CFR 202.13(b)(1).
    \16\ 85 FR at 27298; see 37 CFR 202.13(b)(3).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 10175]]

    The Office made clear that the modifications made under the May 
2020 Interim Rule were temporary and would last only until the COVID-19 
emergency ended.\17\ The Office also noted that the accommodation made 
under the May 2020 Interim Rule was not determinative of the final rule 
in this proceeding, but that the Office would monitor the operation of 
the rule to evaluate whether and under what conditions tests that are 
remotely administered by the test publishers should qualify as ``secure 
tests'' under the Office's regulations once the emergency period 
ends.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Pursuant to her authority under section 710(a) of the 
Copyright Act, the Register determined that the disruptions to the 
copyright system resulting from the national emergency remain in 
effect as of January 7, 2021. See U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright 
Office Further Extends Timing Adjustments for Persons Affected by 
the COVID-19 Emergency (Jan. 7, 2021), https://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2021/871.html.
    \18\ 85 FR at 27298.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Office also noted that it was exploring possible options to 
examine secure test claims via secure videoconference. To that end, the 
Office invited comments on the technological requirements that would be 
needed for test publishers to participate if the Office decided to 
implement such a process. The Office specifically sought comment on the 
feasibility of using the WebEx platform for remote examination, as that 
program is currently supported by the Library of Congress.\19\ The 
Office received five comments in response.\20\ As discussed further 
below, the comments generally supported the use of WebEx, or other 
secure videoconferencing platforms.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ The public comments received in this proceeding may be 
accessed from the Office's website at https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/securetests/.
    \21\ See Comments of the National College Testing Association at 
7-8 (June 8, 2020) (``NCTA Comments''); Comments of Association of 
Test Publishers at 9-11 (June 8, 2020) (``ATP Comments''); Comments 
of Association of American Medical Colleges at 1-2 (June 5, 2020) 
(``AAMC Comments''); Comments of Educational Testing Service (May 
20, 2020) (``ETS Comments'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The comments also reiterated previous concerns regarding the 
Office's ``secure test'' definition set forth in 37 CFR 202.13(b), 
primarily the requirement that a test must be administered on 
``scheduled dates'' at a ``specified center'' where ``test takers are 
physically assembled at the same time.'' \22\ NCTA and ATP referred to 
points previously made by several commenters in this proceeding ``that 
existing testing technology already supports the identical testing 
outcomes provided'' in the May 2020 Interim Rule.\23\ They contend that 
the Office's ``attempt to limit the [May 2020] Interim Rule to tests 
that were `formerly conducted in person' fails to recognize that there 
is simply no difference in at home/remote proctored testing because of 
COVID-19--the same type of testing that was occurring on a daily basis 
before COVID-19, and will continue to occur in exactly the same manner 
following a time when in-person testing may resume.'' \24\ They 
conclude ``there is no basis for requiring users of the [May] 2020 
Interim Rule to `return' to in-person testing'' whenever the national 
emergency ends and urge the Office to make the May 2020 Interim Rule 
permanent.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See NCTA Comments at 4; ATP Comments at 6-7.
    \23\ NCTA Comments at 4; ATP Comments at 5.
    \24\ NCTA Comments at 4; ATP Comments at 5-6.
    \25\ NCTA Comments at 4; ATP Comments at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. The Interim Rule

    While the Office continues to evaluate the secure tests regulations 
as a whole--taking into consideration the concerns of test publishers 
expressed throughout this rulemaking--to determine whether changes may 
be warranted before issuing a final rule, it issues this additional 
interim rule to allow for the remote examination of secure test claims 
by Copyright Office staff during the national emergency. Although 
applicants continue to submit these claims during the Office's closure, 
the Office cannot conduct in-person examinations. As a result, the 
Office now has more than 1,500 secure test claims pending and expects 
that this number will otherwise continue to grow for the duration of 
the COVID-19 emergency. The accumulation of claims has created a 
backlog of secure test claims that cannot be examined until the Office 
resumes normal operations. To address this issue, the Office has 
devised a process that it is now adopting that will allow its staff to 
perform secure test examinations remotely during the national 
emergency.

A. Examination Under the Existing Rules and Considerations for a Remote 
Examination Process

    Currently, applicants seeking registration of a secure test or a 
group of secure test items must submit the following materials through 
the Office's electronic registration system: (1) The application, (2) a 
filing fee, (3) a brief questionnaire, and (4) a redacted copy of the 
work(s). The examiner assigned to the claim reviews the submitted 
materials to determine if the work(s) qualify as a secure test or 
secure test items.\26\ If so, the examiner contacts the applicant to 
schedule an in-person appointment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ For ease of reference, the term ``secure tests'' is used 
interchangeably in this notice to refer to both secure tests and 
groups of secure test items.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the in-person examination, under the 2017 Interim Rules, 
applicants are required to bring the following materials to the Office: 
(1) A copy of the completed online application, (2) a nonrefundable 
secure test examination fee (calculated on an hourly basis), (3) a copy 
of the redacted version of the work(s) uploaded to the electronic 
registration system, (4) a signed declaration that the redacted copy 
brought to the in-person appointment is identical to the redacted copy 
uploaded through the electronic registration system, and (5) an 
unredacted copy of the actual test that is administered to test takers 
at specified centers on scheduled dates or an unredacted copy of the 
actual test items included in the group registration. The redacted and 
unredacted copies may be brought to the appointment in electronic form, 
provided they are stored on a CD-ROM, DVD, flash drive, or other 
external storage device. In such cases, the applicant must bring a 
laptop or other electronic device for the examiner to view the secure 
test materials. In recognition that the national coronavirus emergency 
made testing administration at specified centers infeasible, the May 
2020 Interim Rule temporarily suspended this requirement, ``provided 
the test administrator employs measures to maintain the security and 
integrity of the test that it reasonably determines to be substantially 
equivalent to the security and integrity provided by in-person 
proctors.'' \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 37 CFR 202.13(b)(1); 85 FR at 27298.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The examiner then reviews the redacted and unredacted copies in the 
applicant's presence. Upon completion of the in-person examination, the 
examiner will stamp the date of the appointment on the redacted and 
unredacted copies. If paper copies are examined, the examiner date-
stamps both the redacted and unredacted versions. If electronic copies 
are examined, the examiner places the external storage device (such as 
a flash drive, CD, etc.) in its container, seals the container with 
tamper-proof tape, stamps the date of the appointment on a label, and 
applies that label to the container. Then the examiner returns the 
physical or electronic copies to the applicant. The signed declaration 
and the previously uploaded redacted copy of the work(s) are retained 
in the

[[Page 10176]]

Office's records and may be made available to the public under 
appropriate circumstances. If the work(s) contain sufficient creative 
authorship, a registration certificate will be mailed to the applicant 
within a few weeks of approval. Because of the national emergency, in-
person examinations have been suspended since March 2020.
    The comments received in response to the May 2020 Interim Rule 
suggested various security protocols and other procedures for the 
Office to consider in implementing remote examination. The National 
College Testing Association (NCTA) supported examination by 
videoconference and suggested various software protocols that the 
Office could consider to maintain security, such as confirming 
compliance with National Institute of Standards and Technology 
(``NIST'') Federal Information Processing Standards, employment of 
appropriate encryption techniques, and enhanced training of Office 
examiners in the use of secure virtual meeting technologies.\28\ The 
Association of Test Publishers (ATP) echoed these suggestions and also 
suggested that the Office employ dual screen control and dual scrolling 
software.\29\ The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) 
endorsed the use of WebEx, and suggested that for security reasons, the 
applicant should be the host of any teleconference.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ NCTA Comments at 7-8. NCTA also stated that the Office 
should permanently adopt the principal alterations in the 2020 
Interim Rule--particularly allowing remote testing, remote 
proctoring, and electronic storage of tests. Id. at 3-6.
    \29\ ATP Comments at 9-11. ATP also suggested that the Office 
create a document that contains the material being registered that 
was returned to the applicant, in essence, generating the unredacted 
deposit. Id. The interim rule retains that responsibility with the 
applicant. ATP also stated that the Office should adopt many of the 
interim rule changes permanently, principally remote testing and 
proctoring, and secure electronic storage. Id. at 4-9.
    \30\ AAMC Comments at 1-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After reviewing these comments, the Literary Division of the 
Registration Program solicited responses from frequent submitters of 
secure test applications to determine their willingness and ability to 
participate in a ``test run'' of a remote examination. The National 
Board of Medical Examiners (``NBME'') expressed interest in 
participating. NBME proposed that the ``test run'' be conducted using a 
fabricated deposit copy created specifically for use in the ``test 
run;'' the remote examination would be performed through the WebEx 
platform, since it is currently supported by the Library.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See 85 FR at 27298. No registrations were issued as a 
result of this test run; it was conducted solely to determine the 
feasibility of the process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ``test run'' examination took place on June 12, 2020. NBME set 
up the 30-minute appointment through WebEx and provided the link to the 
examiner. NBME shared its computer screen with the examiner through 
WebEx and displayed redacted and unredacted deposit copies side-by-
side, as would occur at an in-person examination. NBME used the dual-
scrolling software ``Setup Scrolling,'' which allows for the viewing of 
two PDF documents side-by-side and scrolling through both documents at 
the same time, while keeping the pages from each document aligned. This 
feature permits the examiner to easily compare the two PDF documents. 
NBME gave the examiner control of its computer in order to scroll 
through and examine the deposit material, much in the same manner and 
at the same speed as in an in-person examination.
    Overall, the remote examination proceeded smoothly. NBME, however, 
raised several logistical issues, including questions regarding the 
submission of the signed declaration and the date-stamping of the 
unredacted deposit. The Office has developed proposed solutions to 
these issues, addressed below. Given the success of the ``test run,'' 
the Office now is prepared to move forward with the examination of 
secure test applications through secure videoconference for the 
duration of the national emergency.

B. The Remote Examination Procedure Under This Interim Rule

    Based on this input, the Office is now adopting a procedure for 
examining secure tests that is generally the same as outlined in the 
current regulation, except as described below.\32\ Participation in the 
process set forth in today's Interim Rule is strictly voluntary. 
Applicants may opt for an in-person examination, recognizing that such 
examinations cannot occur until the national emergency ends and the 
Office resumes normal operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Today's interim rule provides an overview of how remote 
examination will work; more detailed instructions can be found in 
the Office's circular on secure tests (Circular 64), available at 
https://www.copyright.gov/circs/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Applicants are still required to submit the application, filing 
fee, questionnaire, and redacted copy of the work(s) through the 
electronic registration system. As before, the examiner will review 
these materials to determine if the work(s) qualifies as a secure test 
or a group of secure test items. If any issues arise during this 
review, the examiner will communicate with the applicant to resolve 
such issues before scheduling a remote examination.
    Once any issues regarding the submitted materials have been 
resolved, the examiner will work with the applicant to schedule the 
appointment for the remote examination. The applicant is responsible 
for setting up the appointment through the WebEx platform or other 
similar teleconferencing platforms that have been approved for use by 
the Library of Congress,\33\ and sending the videoconference 
information to the email address provided by the examiner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ In its circular on secure tests, the Office will provide a 
representative list of software programs that provide this 
functionality.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The day before the scheduled appointment, the examiner will enable 
the ``Upload Deposit'' function in the electronic registration system 
to allow the applicant to upload the declaration form attesting that 
the redacted copy uploaded through the system and the redacted copy 
displayed at the remote examination are identical. The declaration must 
include a legally binding signature. The Office will accept an 
electronic signature as defined in 15 U.S.C. 7006, such as ``/s/ Jane 
Doe,'' a digital image of a handwritten signature on the form, or other 
verified electronic signature. By contrast, the applicant need not 
supply a completed copy of the online application; the examiner can 
retrieve a copy from the electronic registration system, if necessary.
    On the day of the appointment, the examiner will log into the 
approved teleconferencing platform at the appropriate time using the 
information provided by the applicant. All participants must use a 
personal computer that has a camera and a microphone so that the 
applicant and examiner will be able to see and communicate with each 
other during the videoconference. During the examination, the applicant 
will pull up the redacted and unredacted copies side-by-side when 
instructed by the examiner. The applicant must have so-called ``dual-
scrolling'' software that is compatible with the teleconferencing 
platform being used in order to participate in a remote examination 
allowed under today's interim rule. The applicant must remain available 
to answer any questions the examiner may have during the course of the 
examination.

[[Page 10177]]

    Normally, at the conclusion of the in-person examination, the 
examiner would date-stamp the redacted and unredacted paper copies of 
the deposit, or, if the applicant brought electronic copies to the 
appointment, the examiner would place the physical storage device in 
its container, seal the container with tamper-proof tape, stamp the 
date of the appointment on a label, and apply that label to the 
container.
    As this step is not possible in a remote examination, applicant 
will be responsible for maintaining its copy of the unredacted deposit, 
in the event it is needed for litigation or other purposes. The interim 
rule specifies that the metadata of the unredacted deposit file must 
include the date of the examination, and the service request number 
generated by the electronic registration system. The redacted deposit 
that was uploaded to the electronic registration system can be used to 
identify the material examined by the Office by comparing the redacted 
and unredacted copies examined during the videoconference session to 
determine if they match. In connection with the Office's overall 
continuing analysis of the registration option for secure tests, the 
Office is considering whether to impose a records retention requirement 
upon applicants who register under these conditions, similar to other 
regulatory records retention provisions.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See, e.g., 37 CFR 210.27(m); 85 FR 58114, 58154 (Sept. 17, 
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After the appointment, the examiner will prepare a Secure Test 
Appointment Receipt, containing the following information: (1) Date of 
appointment; (2) time of appointment; (3) name of work examined; (4) 
name of examiner conducting examination; (5) applicant's 
representative(s); and (6) the fee charged per hour. This receipt will 
be uploaded into the record in the electronic registration system. The 
examiner will email a copy of this receipt to the applicant, along with 
instructions for submitting the secure test examination fee.\35\ The 
fee must be paid through pay.gov or charged to an active deposit 
account. The Office will not issue a registration certificate until it 
receives full payment of this fee. Calculation of the fee will be done 
on an hourly basis, in the same manner as for an in-person examination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See 37 CFR 201.3(d)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If the Office issues a registration certificate, the examiner will 
add an annotation that includes the date of the appointment. The 
effective date of registration will be the date that the Office 
received--in proper form--the application, filing fee, and the redacted 
copy of the test that was uploaded to the electronic registration 
system, consistent with the current procedure.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See 82 FR at 26853.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As with the other interim rules issued in this proceeding, the 
Office will monitor the operation of today's interim rule to evaluate 
whether remote examination of secure tests and groups of secure test 
items via secure videoconference should continue once the national 
emergency period ends. The Office understands the concerns of, and 
importance to, test publishers that the definition for a ``secure 
test'' reflect the current testing practices and testing technology, as 
well as other issues raised by commenters throughout this rulemaking 
proceeding. The Office takes these concerns seriously and continues to 
carefully consider them. The Office anticipates issuing a future 
separate notice that will revisit the regulatory definition for a 
``secure test.''
    In light of the ongoing national emergency, the Copyright Office 
finds good cause to publish these amendments as an interim rule 
effective immediately, and without first publishing a notice of 
proposed rulemaking, ``because of the demonstrable urgency of the 
conditions they are designed to correct.'' \37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ H.R. Rep. No. 79-1980, at 260 (1946). See 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(3)(B) (notice and comment is not necessary upon agency 
determination that it would be ``impracticable, unnecessary, or 
contrary to the public interest''); id. at 553(d) (30-day notice not 
required where agency finds good cause).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 202

    Copyright, Preregistration and Registration of Claims to Copyright.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office 
amends 37 CFR part 202 as follows:

PART 202--PREREGISTRATON AND REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT

0
1. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.


0
2. Amend Sec.  202.13 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (c)(1), remove ``standard application'' and add 
``Standard Application'' in its place;
0
b. Revise paragraph (c)(2);
0
c. In paragraph (c)(3) introductory text, remove ``bring'' and add in 
its place ``provide''; and
0
d. Revise paragraph (c)(3)(v) and (c)(4).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  202.13   Secure tests.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) In case of a secure test, the applicant must submit a redacted 
copy of the entire test. In the case of a group of test items prepared 
for use in a secure test, the applicant must submit a redacted copy of 
each test item. In all cases the redacted copy must contain a 
sufficient amount of visible content to reasonably identify the 
work(s). In addition, the applicant must complete and submit the secure 
test questionnaire that is posted on the Copyright Office's website. 
The questionnaire and the redacted copy must be contained in separate 
electronic files, and each file must be uploaded to the electronic 
registration system in Portable Document Format (PDF). The Copyright 
Office will review these materials to determine if the work(s) qualify 
for an examination under secure conditions. If they appear to be 
eligible, the Copyright Office will contact the applicant to schedule 
an appointment to examine an unredacted copy of the work(s). The 
examination may be conducted in-person or through remote access as 
directed by the instructions provided on the Office's website.
    (3) * * *
    (v) In the case of a secure test, the applicant must provide an 
unredacted copy of the entire test. In the case of a group of test 
items prepared for use in a secure test, the applicant must provide an 
unredacted copy of all the test items. The applicant shall include the 
following information in the metadata of an unredacted electronic file:
    (A) The date of the examination; and
    (B) The service request number generated by the electronic 
registration system.
    (4) The Copyright Office will examine the copies specified in 
paragraphs (c)(3)(iii) and (v) of this section under secure conditions. 
The Office will retain the signed declaration and the redacted copy 
that was uploaded to the electronic registration system. If the 
examination is conducted in-person, the Office will stamp the date of 
the appointment on the copies and will return them to the applicant 
when the examination is complete.
* * * * *

    Dated: February 3, 2021.
Shira Perlmutter,
Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright Office.
    Approved by:
Carla D. Hayden,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2021-03097 Filed 2-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P