[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6576-6580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00033]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 208

[Docket No. R-1738]
RIN 7100-AG08


Membership of State Banking Institutions in the Federal Reserve 
System; Reports of Suspicious Activities Under Bank Secrecy Act

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking with request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is inviting comment on a proposed rule that would 
modify the requirements to file Suspicious Activity Reports for state 
member banks, Edge and agreement corporations, U.S. offices of foreign 
banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve, and bank 
holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries. Specifically, the 
proposed rule would amend the Board's Suspicious Activity Report 
regulations to provide for the issuance of exemptions from the 
requirements of those regulations, in full or in part. The proposed 
rule is intended, among other things, to facilitate supervised

[[Page 6577]]

institutions in meeting Bank Secrecy Act requirements more efficiently 
and effectively, including through development of innovative solutions.

DATES: Comments must be received by February 22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. R-1738 and 
RIN 7100-AG08, by any of the following methods:
     Agency website: http://www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments at https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/proposedregs.aspx.
     Email: [email protected]. Include docket 
number and RIN in the subject line of the message.
     Fax: (202) 452-3819 or (202) 452-3102.
     Mail: Ann E. Misback, Secretary, Board of Governors of the 
Federal Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20551.
    All public comments are available from the Board's website at 
http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as 
submitted, unless modified for technical reasons or to remove 
personally identifiable information at the commenter's request. 
Accordingly, comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or 
contact information. Public comments may also be viewed electronically 
or in paper in Room 146, 1709 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006, 
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays. For security reasons, the 
Board requires that visitors call (202) 452-3684 to make an appointment 
to inspect comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Gonzalez, Assistant General 
Counsel, (202) 452-3725, or Bernard Kim, Senior Counsel, (202) 452-
3083, Legal Division; or Suzanne Williams, Deputy Associate Director, 
(202) 452-3513, or Koko Ives, Manager, (202) 973-6163, Division of 
Supervision and Regulation, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551. 
Users of Telecommunication Device for Deaf (TDD) only, call (202) 263-
4869.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    Pursuant to the Board's Regulations H, K, and Y, state member 
banks, Edge and agreement corporations, U.S. offices of foreign banking 
organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve, and bank holding 
companies and their nonbank subsidiaries must file Suspicious Activity 
Reports (SARs) to report known or suspected violations of U.S. law.\1\ 
The proposed rule would amend the Board's SAR regulations to expressly 
provide for exemptions from the regulations' SAR requirements, in full 
or in part and subject to the Board's approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 12 CFR 208.62; 12 CFR 211.5(k); 12 CFR 211.24(f); 12 CFR 
225.4(f). See Board, Supervision & Regulation Letter (SR) 10-8, 
``Suspicious Activity Report Filing Requirements for Banking 
Organizations Supervised by the Federal Reserve'' (Apr. 27, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Background

    The Board, along with the other federal banking agencies, is 
charged with safeguarding the safety and soundness of its supervised 
institutions. Pursuant to its safety-and-soundness authority and 
enabling statutes, the Board has long required a member bank, a bank 
holding company and its nonbank subsidiaries, an Edge Act or Agreement 
corporation, or a U.S. branch or agency of a foreign bank to refer 
potential violations of law arising from transactions that flow through 
those institutions to relevant law enforcement authorities, because 
financial crimes can pose serious threats to a financial institution's 
continued viability and, if unchecked, may undermine the public 
confidence in the financial services industry.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See generally 58 FR 47206 (Sept. 3, 1993) (codifying the 
Board's criminal referral procedures); see also SR 88-9, ``New 
Criminal Referral Form and Updated Criminal Referral Procedures'' 
(Mar. 18, 1988).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 1992, Congress passed the Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering 
Act, which redesigned the criminal referral process applicable to 
Board-supervised entities and made the reporting of certain suspicious 
transactions a requirement of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).\3\ The Act 
permitted the Department of the Treasury to require financial 
institutions to ``report any suspicious transaction relevant to a 
possible violation of law or regulation.'' \4\ Thereafter, the 
Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the federal banking 
agencies and law enforcement, developed the modern SAR form and 
reporting process, which standardized the reporting forms, eliminated 
duplicate filings, and created a centralized database that could be 
accessed by multiple law enforcement and regulatory agencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Public Law 102-550, 106 Stat. 3672 (1992).
    \4\ 31 U.S.C. 5318(g)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To implement this new reporting system, the Financial Crimes 
Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the Department of the 
Treasury, issued its implementing SAR regulations in 1996. The 
regulations require financial institutions subject to the requirements 
of the BSA to, among other things, specifically address the reporting 
of money laundering transactions and transactions designed to evade the 
reporting requirements of the BSA.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 61 FR 4326 (Feb. 5, 1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To further implement this new reporting process and reduce 
unnecessary reporting burdens, the Board and the other federal banking 
agencies contemporaneously amended their criminal referral form 
regulations to incorporate the new SAR form and reporting database, 
align their regulatory reporting requirements with FinCEN's BSA 
reporting requirements, and further refine the reporting processes.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 61 FR 4338 (Feb. 5, 1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of this redesign and FinCEN's implementing regulations, 
relevant institutions supervised by the Board are currently required to 
file SARs under both the Board's and FinCEN's SAR regulations. These 
regulations are not identical but are substantially similar with regard 
to the specified BSA reporting obligations required by FinCEN, in that 
they both require banks, among other things, to file SARs relating to 
money laundering and transactions designed to evade BSA reporting 
requirements, as well as maintain the confidentiality of a SAR in most 
circumstances. However, the Board's SAR regulations cover a slightly 
broader range of transactions, for example, by requiring SARs to be 
filed for any known or suspected instance of insider abuse in any 
amount, and further requiring the prompt notification to the 
institution's board of directors when a SAR has been filed.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has statutory authority to grant 
exemptions from the requirements of the BSA, which includes FinCEN's 
SAR requirements.\7\ The regulation implementing this exemption 
authority provides: \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 31 U.S.C. 5318(a)(7).
    \8\ 31 CFR 1010.970(a).

    The Secretary [of the Treasury], in his sole discretion, may by 
written order or authorization make exceptions to or grant 
exemptions from the requirements of this chapter. Such exceptions or 
exemptions may be conditional or unconditional, may apply to 
particular persons or to classes of persons, and may apply to 
particular transactions or classes of transactions. They shall, 
however, be applicable only as expressly stated in the order of 
authorization, and they shall be revocable in the sole discretion of 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
the Secretary.


[[Page 6578]]


    The Secretary of the Treasury has delegated this exemption 
authority to FinCEN. The purpose of the Board's proposed rule, which 
would largely parallel FinCEN's general exemptive authority, would be 
to facilitate the Board's granting of relief to a bank seeking an 
exemption from the requirements of the Board's SAR regulations.
    The decision to grant or deny such an exemption would be made from 
a safety-and-soundness and anti-money laundering regulatory 
perspective. In particular, the Board's view is that these exemptions 
would facilitate supervised institutions to meet BSA requirements more 
efficiently and effectively, including through development of 
innovative solutions. Financial technology and innovation continue to 
develop in the area of monitoring and reporting financial crime and 
terrorist financing, and the Board recognizes the increasing importance 
of regulatory flexibility to such efforts. Recently, the Board, along 
with the other federal banking agencies and FinCEN, issued a statement 
encouraging banks to take innovative approaches to meet their BSA/anti-
money laundering (BSA/AML) compliance obligations.\9\ The statement 
explained that banks are encouraged to consider, evaluate, and where 
appropriate, responsibly implement innovative approaches in this area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Joint Statement on Innovative Efforts to Combat Money 
Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Dec. 3, 2018), available at 
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/files/bcreg20181203a1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, innovative approaches and technological developments in the 
area of SAR monitoring, investigation, and filings may involve, among 
other things: (i) Automated form population using natural language 
processing, transaction data, and customer due diligence information; 
(ii) automated or limited investigation processes depending on the 
complexity and risk of a particular transaction and appropriate 
safeguards; and (iii) enhanced monitoring processes using more and 
better data, optical scanning, artificial intelligence, or machine 
learning capabilities. Accordingly, exemptive relief may be helpful to 
foster innovation in this area, as the Board expects that new 
technologies will continue to prompt additional innovative approaches 
related to SAR filing and monitoring.
    It is important to recognize that any Board-issued exemptions from 
its SAR regulations would not relieve the supervised institution from 
the independent obligation to comply with FinCEN's SAR regulations, if 
applicable. To the extent that the supervised institution is subject to 
requirements imposed by both the Board's and FinCEN's SAR regulations, 
the institution would need to acquire an exemption from both the Board 
and FinCEN. The Board expects to coordinate with FinCEN when handling 
such parallel exemption requests, and accordingly, the Board's proposed 
rule would require FinCEN's concurrence with regard to such exemptions. 
As explained above, however, the Board's SAR regulation imposes 
additional requirements not included in FinCEN's regulation. To the 
extent the supervised institution is subject to a requirement imposed 
by the Board's SAR regulations alone (and not a parallel FinCEN 
requirement), the proposed rule would allow the Board to exempt the 
institution from that requirement without FinCEN's concurrence.

III. The Proposal

    The proposed rule would provide for the issuance of exemptions from 
the requirements, in full or in part, of the Board's SAR regulations. 
Upon receiving a written request from a Board-supervised institution, 
the Board would determine whether the exemption is consistent with safe 
and sound banking. The Board would also seek FinCEN's determination 
whether the exemption is consistent with the purposes of the BSA, as 
applicable, where an exemption request involves an exemption from the 
requirements to file a SAR required by FinCEN regulations implementing 
the BSA.
    The proposed rule would require the Board to seek FinCEN's 
concurrence regarding any exemptions that involve SAR provisions 
relating to potential money laundering or violations of the BSA or 
other unusual activity covered by FinCEN's SAR regulation. The proposed 
rule would allow the Board to consult with FinCEN regarding other 
exemption requests. The Board may also consult with the other state and 
federal banking agencies before granting any exemption.
    An approved exemption under the proposed rule may apply to only 
certain parts of the SAR requirements. It may be conditional or 
unconditional, may apply to particular persons or to classes of 
persons, and may apply to transactions or classes of transactions. In 
addition, the proposed rule provides that the Board may grant an 
exemption for a specified time period or extend the time period of a 
previously granted exemption. Finally, the proposed rule provides that 
the Board may, in its sole discretion, revoke previously granted 
exemptions.
    The changes made by the proposed rule would add a new paragraph (l) 
to Sec.  208.62 of Regulation H (12 CFR 208.62), which concerns the SAR 
filing obligations of member banks. Sections 211.5(k) and 211.24(f) of 
Regulation K (12 CFR 211.5(k) and 211.24(f)) and Sec.  225.4(f) of 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.4(f)) make Sec.  208.62 of Regulation H 
applicable to Edge and Agreement corporations, the U.S. branches and 
agencies of foreign banks (except a Federal branch or Federal agency or 
a state branch that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation), a representative office of a foreign bank, and bank 
holding companies and their nonbank subsidiaries, respectively. This 
means that the changes applicable to member banks will also be 
applicable to the suspicious activity reporting responsibilities of 
these other domestic and foreign banking organizations supervised by 
the Federal Reserve, including bank holding companies, Edge 
corporations, and the U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks.
    The Board welcomes comments on any aspect of the proposed rule, in 
particular, with regard to whether additional or different factors or 
standards should be applied in the determination whether to grant an 
exemption request, as well as the form and manner of the Board's 
response to an exemption request.

IV. Administrative Law Matters

A. Solicitation of Comments and Use of Plain Language

    Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. 106-102, 113 
Stat. 1338, 1471, 12 U.S.C. 4809) requires the Federal banking agencies 
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after 
January 1, 2000. The Board has sought to present the proposed rule in a 
simple and straightforward manner, and invites comment on the use of 
plain language.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis

    Certain provisions of the proposed rule contain ``collections of 
information'' within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). In accordance with the requirements of the 
PRA, the Board may not conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not 
required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a 
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. 
The Board reviewed the proposed rule under the authority delegated to 
the Board by OMB. The proposed rule contains reporting requirements 
subject to the PRA. To

[[Page 6579]]

implement these requirements, the Board is revising the Suspicious 
Activity Report (FR 2230; OMB No. 7100-0212),
    Comments are invited on:
    a. Whether the collections of information are necessary for the 
proper performance of the agencies' functions, including whether the 
information has practical utility;
    b. The accuracy or the estimate of the burden of the information 
collections, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used;
    c. Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected;
    d. Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and
    e. Estimates of capital or startup costs and costs of operation, 
maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information.
    All comments will become a matter of public record. Comments on 
aspects of this notice that may affect reporting, recordkeeping, or 
disclosure requirements and burden estimates should be sent to the 
addresses listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. A copy of 
the comments may also be submitted to the OMB desk officer for the 
agencies by mail to U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th 
Street NW, #10235, Washington, DC 20503; facsimile to (202) 395-5806; 
or email [email protected], Attention, Federal Reserve Desk 
Officer.
Proposed Information Collection
    Title of information collection: Suspicious Activity Report.
    Agency form number: FR 2230.
    OMB control number: 7100-0212.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Affected public: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Respondents: State member banks, bank holding companies and their 
nonbank subsidiaries, Edge and agreement corporations, and the U.S. 
branches and agencies, representative offices, and nonbank subsidiaries 
of foreign banks supervised by the Board.
    Description of information collection: Certain institutions 
supervised by the Board are required, pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act 
(BSA) and the Board's regulations, to file a SAR to report known or 
suspected violations of federal law or a suspicious transaction related 
to a money laundering activity or a violation of the BSA. Institutions 
file a SAR electronically through a secure network created and 
maintained by the administrator of the BSA, the Department of the 
Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
    Current actions: The proposed rule would provide for the issuance 
of exemptions from the requirements, in full or in part, of the Board's 
SAR regulations. In section 208.62(l), upon receiving a written request 
from a Board-supervised institution, the Board would determine whether 
the exemption is consistent with safe and sound banking. The written 
request for exemption would be a new reporting requirement under the 
PRA. The Board estimates that the average hours per response would be 8 
hours.
    In addition, because FinCEN already accounts for the reporting 
burden for all respondents (including Board-supervised institutions) to 
file a SAR (see OMB Control No. 1506-0065) the Board would remove this 
same reporting burden from the FR 2230.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Section 208.62(e) encourages respondents to file SARs with 
state and local law enforcement agencies. In practice, these 
agencies have access to SARs through FinCEN's database, making it 
unnecessary for respondents to file SARs directly with these 
agencies. Therefore, the Board assumes de minimus burden for this 
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Legal authorization and confidentiality: The FR 2230 is authorized 
pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 248(a)(1), 602, and 
625), Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1818(s)), Bank Holding 
Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1844(c)), and International Banking Act 
of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3105(c)(2) and 3106(a)). The FR 2230 is mandatory.
    SARs are confidential and exempt from Freedom of Information Act 
(FOIA) disclosure by 31 U.S.C. 5319, which specifically provides that 
SARs ``are exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5'' and 
FOIA exemption 3 (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)) (matters ``specifically exempted 
from disclosure by statute'').
    Estimated number of respondents: Reporting Section 208.62(l)-3.
    Estimated average hours per response: Reporting Section 208.62(l)-
8.
    Current estimated annual burden hours: 439,520.
    Estimated annual burden hours due to proposed revisions: Exemption 
request, 24; removal of SAR filing, (439,520).
    Proposed estimated annual burden hours: 24.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., (RFA), 
generally requires an agency, in connection with a proposed rule, to 
prepare an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis describing the 
impact of the rule on small entities based on size standards of the 
Small Business Administration (SBA) or to certify that the proposed 
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis 
must contain (1) a description of the reasons why action by the agency 
is being considered; (2) a succinct statement of the objectives of, and 
legal basis for, the proposed rule; (3) a description of, and, where 
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities to which the 
proposed rule will apply; (4) a description of the projected reporting, 
recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, 
including an estimate of the classes of small entities that will be 
subject to the requirement and the type of professional skills 
necessary for preparation of the report or record; (5) an 
identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant federal 
rules which may duplicate, overlap with, or conflict with the proposed 
rule; and (6) a description of any significant alternatives to the 
proposed rule which accomplish its stated objectives. The Board has 
considered the potential impact of the proposed rule on small entities 
in accordance with section 603 of the RFA.\11\ Under regulations issued 
by the SBA, a small entity includes a bank, bank holding company, or 
savings and loan holding company with assets of $600 million or less 
and trust companies with annual receipts of $41.5 million or less.\12\ 
As of March 2020, there were approximately 2,925 small bank holding 
companies, 132 small savings and loan holding companies, and 472 small 
state member banks. As of March 2020, the Board does not supervise any 
small trust companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 5 U.S.C. 603.
    \12\ See 13 CFR 121.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on its analysis and for the reasons stated below, the Board 
believes that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Nevertheless, the 
Board is publishing and inviting comment on this initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis. A final regulatory flexibility analysis may be 
conducted after any comments received during the public comment period 
have been considered. The Board welcomes comment on all aspects of its 
analysis. In particular, the Board requests that commenters describe 
the nature of any impact on small entities and provide empirical data 
to illustrate and support the extent of the impact.
    As discussed above, the purpose of the Board's proposed rule is to 
facilitate

[[Page 6580]]

the Board's granting of relief to a bank seeking relief from the 
requirements of the Board's SAR regulations, when such relief would be 
beneficial from a safety-and-soundness and anti-money laundering 
regulatory perspective. The proposed rule would be issued pursuant to 
the Board's safety-and-soundness authority over supervised 
institutions. The proposed rule will apply to small bank holding 
companies and their nonbank subsidiaries and small state member banks 
as well as Edge and agreement corporations, and U.S. offices of foreign 
banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve. The Board does 
not expect that the proposal would impose a significant cost on small 
banking organizations due to compliance, recordkeeping, and reporting 
updates from this proposal. The Board does not believe that the 
proposal would result in any significant economic impact on banking 
organizations as there are no projected recordkeeping, reporting, or 
other compliance requirements associated with the proposal. Moreover, 
the proposal does not impose any new requirements on banking 
organization, as applying for an exemption under the proposal would be 
entirely voluntary. In addition, the Board is not aware of any federal 
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule. For 
these reasons, the Board believes that the proposed rule will not have 
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
supervised by the Board, and believes that there are no significant 
alternatives to the proposed rule that would reduce the economic impact 
on small banking organizations supervised by the Board.

D. Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994

    Pursuant to section 302(a) of the Riegle Community Development and 
Regulatory Improvement Act (RCDRIA), in determining the effective date 
and administrative compliance requirements for new regulations that 
impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other requirements on 
insured depository institutions, each federal banking agency must 
consider, consistent with principles of safety and soundness and the 
public interest, any administrative burdens that such regulations would 
place on insured depository institutions, including small depository 
institutions, and customers of depository institutions, as well as the 
benefits of such regulations.\13\ In addition, section 302(b) of RCDRIA 
requires new regulations and amendments to regulations that impose 
additional reporting, disclosures, or other new requirements on insured 
depository institutions generally to take effect on the first day of a 
calendar quarter that begins on or after the date on which the 
regulations are published in final form.\14\ The proposed rule would 
not impose additional reporting, disclosure, or other requirements; 
therefore the requirements of the RCDRIA do not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(a).
    \14\ 12 U.S.C. 4802(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, the agencies invite comments that further will inform the 
agencies' consideration of RCDRIA.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 208

    Accounting, Agriculture, Banks, Banking, Confidential business 
information, Consumer protection, Crime, Currency, Federal Reserve 
System, Flood insurance, Insurance, Investments, Mortgages, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Board of Governors of 
the Federal Reserve System proposes to amend 12 CFR part 208 as 
follows:

PART 208--MEMBERSHIP OF STATE BANKING INSTITUTIONS IN THE FEDERAL 
RESERVE SYSTEM (REGULATION H)

0
1. The authority citation for part 208 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 24, 36, 92a, 93a, 248(a), 248(c), 321-338a, 
371d, 461, 481-486, 601, 611, 1814, 1816, 1817(a)(3), 1817(a)(12), 
1818, 1820(d)(9), 1833(j), 1828(o), 1831, 1831o, 1831p-1, 1831r-1, 
1831w, 1831x, 1835a, 1882, 2901-2907, 3105, 3310, 3331-3351, 3905-
3909, 5371, and 5371 note; 15 U.S.C. 78b, 78I(b), 78l(i), 780-
4(c)(5), 78q, 78q-1, 78w, 1681s, 1681w, 6801, and 6805; 31 U.S.C. 
5318; 42 U.S.C. 4012a, 4104a, 4104b, 4106, and 4128.

0
2. In Sec.  208.62, add a new paragraph (l) to read as follows:


Sec.  208.62  Suspicious activity reports.

* * * * *
    (l) Exemptions.
    (1)(i) The Board may exempt any member bank from the requirements 
of this section. Upon receiving a written request from a member bank, 
the Board will consider whether the exemption is consistent with safe 
and sound banking and may consider other appropriate factors. The Board 
also would seek FinCEN's determination whether the exemption is 
consistent with the purposes of the Bank Secrecy Act, if applicable. 
The exemption shall be applicable only as expressly stated in the 
exemption, may be conditional or unconditional, may apply to particular 
persons or classes of persons, and may apply to transactions or classes 
of transactions.
    (ii) The Board will seek FinCEN's concurrence with regard to any 
exemption request that would also require an exemption from FinCEN's 
SAR regulations, and may consult with FinCEN regarding other exemption 
requests. The Board also may consult with the other state and federal 
banking agencies and consider comments before granting any exemption.
    (2) The Board will provide a written response to the member bank 
that submitted the exemption request after considering whether the 
exemption is consistent with safe and sound banking, consulting with 
the appropriate agencies, and seeking concurrence when appropriate. A 
member bank that has received an exemption under paragraph (1) of this 
section may rely on the exemption for a period of time to be 
communicated by the Board in its granting of the exemption, which may 
be indefinite.
    (3) The Board may extend the period of time or may revoke an 
exemption granted under paragraph (1) of this section. Exemptions may 
be revoked at the sole discretion of the Board. The Board will provide 
written notice to the member bank of the Board's intention to revoke an 
exemption. Such notice will include the basis for the revocation and 
will provide an opportunity for the member bank to submit a response to 
the Board. The Board will consider the response prior to deciding 
whether to revoke an exemption, and will notify the member bank of the 
Board's final decision to revoke an exemption in writing.

    By order of Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021-00033 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P