[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2639-2640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-890]


Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: 
Rescission of 2019 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that the sale made 
by Kunshan Jujia Decoration Design Co., Ltd. (Jujia) is a non-bona fide 
sale. Therefore, we are rescinding this new shipper review (NSR).

DATES: Applicable January 11, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Bremer, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4987.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published its Preliminary Results in this NSR on August 
20, 2020.\1\ Subsequently, Jujia filed a case brief on September 21, 
2020 \2\ and the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal 
Trade and Vaughan-Basset Furniture Company (the petitioners) filed a 
rebuttal brief on September 24, 2020.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Rescission of 2019 Antidumping Duty New Shipper 
Review, 85 FR 51413 (August 20, 2020) (Preliminary Results); see 
also Memorandum, ``2019 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of 
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Bona Fide Sales Analysis for Kunshan Jujia Decoration 
Design Co., Ltd.,'' dated August 14, 2020.
    \2\ See Jujia's Case Brief, ``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China: Jujia's Case Brief,'' dated September 
21, 2020.
    \3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 
People's Republic of China: Petitioners' Rebuttal Brief,'' dated 
September 24, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by this order is wooden bedroom furniture, 
subject to certain exceptions. Imports of subject merchandise are 
classified under the following Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS) subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9080, 
9403.90.7005, 9403.90.7080, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 
9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 and 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and custom purposes, the 
written product description in the order remains dispositive. For a 
complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2019 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of 
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' 
issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues 
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    The issue discussed in the case and rebuttal briefs is addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file via Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum 
and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are 
identical in context. The one issue raised in the case brief is listed 
in the Appendix to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of the Antidumping New Shipper Review

    For the reasons explained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
Commerce continues to find that the sale made by Jujia is not a bona 
fide sale for purposes of the AD law. Commerce reached this conclusion 
based on the totality of the evidence, including, among other things, 
the sales price and quantity. Because Jujia made no bona fide sales 
during the period of review (POR), we are rescinding the NSR.

Assessment Rates

    As Commerce is rescinding this NSR, Jujia's status with respect to 
the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the 
People's Republic of China (China) remains unchanged. Jujia remains 
part of the China-wide entity and, accordingly, entries of its subject 
merchandise into the United States during the POR will be assessed at 
the China-wide rate.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Because we are rescinding this NSR, we are not determining a 
company-specific cash deposit rate for Jujia. Jujia continues to be 
part of the China-wide entity and is, therefore, subject to the China-
wide entity cash deposit rate of 216.01 percent.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018, 85 FR 7731 (February 11, 
2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to an 
Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the

[[Page 2640]]

proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of 
APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: January 7, 2021.
Joseph A. Laroski Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations.

Appendix

List of Sections in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues

    Comment: Whether Jujia's Sale is Bona Fide
V. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-00531 Filed 1-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P