[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 207 (Monday, October 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67938-67960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23540]



[[Page 67937]]

Vol. 85

Monday,

No. 207

October 26, 2020

Part IV





Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection





-----------------------------------------------------------------------





12 CFR Part 1026





Qualified Mortgage Definition Under the Truth in Lending Act 
(Regulation Z): Extension of Sunset Date; Final Rule

  Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / 
Rules and Regulations  

[[Page 67938]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

12 CFR Part 1026

[Docket No. CFPB-2020-0021]


Qualified Mortgage Definition Under the Truth in Lending Act 
(Regulation Z): Extension of Sunset Date

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

ACTION: Final rule; official interpretation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: With certain exceptions, Regulation Z requires creditors to 
make a reasonable, good faith determination of a consumer's ability to 
repay any residential mortgage loan, and loans that meet Regulation Z's 
requirements for ``qualified mortgages'' (QMs) obtain certain 
protections from liability. One category of QMs consists of loans that 
are eligible for purchase or guarantee by either the Federal National 
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation (Freddie Mac) (collectively, government-sponsored 
enterprises, or GSEs), while operating under the conservatorship or 
receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The GSEs are 
currently under Federal conservatorship. In 2013, the Bureau of 
Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) established this category of QMs 
(Temporary GSE QM loans) as a temporary measure that would expire with 
respect to each GSE on the date that GSE exits conservatorship, or on 
January 10, 2021, whichever comes first. In this final rule, the Bureau 
amends Regulation Z to replace the January 10, 2021 sunset date of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition with a provision stating that the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition will be available only for covered 
transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's application 
before the mandatory compliance date of final amendments to the General 
QM loan definition in Regulation Z. This final rule does not amend the 
provision stating that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires 
with respect to a GSE when that GSE exits conservatorship.

DATES: This rule is effective December 28, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Cady, Counsel; or David Friend or 
Priscilla Walton-Fein, Senior Counsels, Office of Regulations, at 202-
435-7700. If you require this document in an alternative electronic 
format, please contact [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Summary of the Final Rule

    The Ability-to-Repay/Qualified Mortgage Rule (ATR/QM Rule) requires 
a creditor to make a reasonable, good faith determination of a 
consumer's ability to repay a residential mortgage loan according to 
its terms. Loans that meet the ATR/QM Rule's requirements for QMs 
obtain certain protections from liability. The ATR/QM Rule defines 
several categories of QMs.
    One QM category defined in the ATR/QM Rule is the General QM loan 
category. General QM loans must comply with the ATR/QM Rule's 
prohibitions on certain loan features, its points-and-fees limits, and 
its underwriting requirements. For General QM loans, the ratio of the 
consumer's total monthly debt to total monthly income (DTI ratio) must 
not exceed 43 percent. Creditors must calculate, consider, and verify 
debt and income for purposes of determining the consumer's DTI ratio 
using the standards contained in appendix Q of Regulation Z.
    A second, temporary category of QM loans defined in the ATR/QM Rule 
consists of mortgages that (1) comply with the same loan-feature 
prohibitions and points-and-fees limits as General QM loans and (2) are 
eligible to be purchased or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac 
while under the conservatorship of the FHFA. This final rule refers to 
these loans as Temporary GSE QM loans, and the provision that created 
this loan category is commonly known as the GSE Patch. Unlike for 
General QM loans, the ATR/QM Rule does not prescribe a DTI limit for 
Temporary GSE QM loans. Thus, a loan can qualify as a Temporary GSE QM 
loan even if the consumer's DTI ratio exceeds 43 percent, as long as 
the loan is eligible to be purchased or guaranteed by either of the 
GSEs. In addition, for Temporary GSE QM loans, the ATR/QM Rule does not 
require creditors to use appendix Q to determine the consumer's income, 
debt, or DTI ratio.
    In 2013, the Bureau provided in the ATR/QM Rule that the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition would expire with respect to each GSE when that 
GSE exits conservatorship or on January 10, 2021, whichever comes 
first. The GSEs are currently in conservatorship. Despite the Bureau's 
expectations when the ATR/QM Rule was published in 2013, Temporary GSE 
QM loan originations continue to represent a large and persistent share 
of the residential mortgage loan market. A significant number of 
Temporary GSE QM loans would be affected by the expiration of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition, including loans for which the 
consumer's DTI ratio is above 43 percent or the creditor's method of 
documenting and verifying income or debt is incompatible with appendix 
Q. Based on 2018 data, the Bureau estimates that, as a result of the 
General QM loan definition's 43 percent DTI limit, approximately 
957,000 loans--16 percent of all closed-end first-lien residential 
mortgage originations in 2018--would be affected by the expiration of 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. These loans are currently 
originated as QM loans due to the Temporary GSE QM loan definition but 
would not be originated under the current General QM loan definition, 
and might not be originated at all, if the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition were to expire.
    On June 22, 2020, the Bureau issued two proposed rules concerning 
the ATR/QM Rule. In one of the proposals--referred to in this final 
rule as the Extension Proposal--the Bureau proposed to extend the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition until the effective date of a final 
rule issued by the Bureau amending the General QM loan definition.\1\ 
In the other proposal--referred to in this final rule as the General QM 
Proposal--the Bureau proposed amendments to the General QM loan 
definition.\2\ In the General QM Proposal, the Bureau proposed, among 
other things, to remove the General QM loan definition's DTI limit and 
replace it with a limit based on the loan's pricing. The Bureau stated 
that it expected such amendments would allow most loans that currently 
could receive QM status under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to 
receive QM status under the General QM loan definition if they are made 
after the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires. Based on 2018 data, 
the Bureau estimated in the General QM Proposal that 943,000 High-DTI 
conventional loans would fall outside the QM definitions if there are 
no changes to the General QM loan definition prior to the expiration of 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition but would fall within the General 
QM loan definition if it were amended as the Bureau proposed. The 
Bureau stated that, as a result, the General QM Proposal would help to 
facilitate a smooth and orderly transition away from the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 85 FR 41448 (July 10, 2020).
    \2\ 85 FR 41716 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 18, 2020, the Bureau issued a third proposal concerning 
the ATR/QM Rule. In that proposal--referred to in this final rule as 
the Seasoned QM Proposal--the Bureau

[[Page 67939]]

proposed to create a new category of QMs (Seasoned QMs) for first-lien, 
fixed-rate covered transactions that meet certain performance 
requirements over a 36-month seasoning period, are held in portfolio 
until the end of the seasoning period, comply with general restrictions 
on product features and points and fees, and meet certain underwriting 
requirements.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 85 FR 53568 (Aug. 28, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In this final rule, the Bureau amends Regulation Z to replace the 
January 10, 2021 sunset date of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
with a provision stating that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition will 
be available only for covered transactions for which the creditor 
receives the consumer's application before the mandatory compliance 
date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition in 
Regulation Z. This final rule does not amend the provision stating that 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires with respect to a GSE when 
that GSE exits conservatorship (the conservatorship clause). This final 
rule does not affect the QM definitions that apply to Federal Housing 
Administration (FHA), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), U.S. 
Department of Agriculture (USDA), or Rural Housing Service (RHS) loans. 
The Bureau concludes that this extension of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition's sunset date will ensure that responsible, affordable 
mortgage credit remains available to consumers who may be affected if 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires before the amendments to 
the General QM loan definition take effect.

II. Background

A. Dodd-Frank Act Amendments to the Truth in Lending Act

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(Dodd-Frank Act) \4\ amended the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) \5\ to 
establish, among other things, ability-to-repay (ATR) requirements in 
connection with the origination of most residential mortgage loans.\6\ 
The amendments were intended ``to assure that consumers are offered and 
receive residential mortgage loans on terms that reasonably reflect 
their ability to repay the loans and that are understandable and not 
unfair, deceptive or abusive.'' \7\ As amended, TILA prohibits a 
creditor from making a residential mortgage loan unless the creditor 
makes a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and 
documented information that the consumer has a reasonable ability to 
repay the loan.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.
    \6\ Dodd-Frank Act sections 1411-12, 1414, 124 Stat. 2142-48, 
2149; 15 U.S.C. 1639c.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 1639b(a)(2).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 1639b(a)(1). TILA section 103 defines 
``residential mortgage loan'' to mean, with some exceptions 
including open-end credit plans, ``any consumer credit transaction 
that is secured by a mortgage deed of trust, or other equivalent 
consensual security interest on a dwelling or on residential real 
property that includes a dwelling.'' 15 U.S.C. 1639b(dd)(5). TILA 
section 129C also exempts certain residential mortgage loans from 
the ATR requirements. See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 1639c(a)(8) (exempting 
reverse mortages and temporary or bridge loans with a term of 12 
months or less).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TILA identifies the factors a creditor must consider in making a 
reasonable and good faith assessment of a consumer's ability to repay. 
These factors are the consumer's credit history, current and expected 
income, current obligations, debt-to-income ratio or residual income 
after paying non-mortgage debt and mortgage-related obligations, 
employment status, and other financial resources other than equity in 
the dwelling or real property that secures the repayment of the 
loan.\9\ A creditor, however, may not be certain whether its ability-
to-repay determination is reasonable in a particular case, and it risks 
liability if a court or an agency, including the Bureau, later 
concludes that the ability-to-repay determination was not reasonable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 1639c(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    TILA addresses this uncertainty by defining a category of loans--
called QMs--for which a creditor ``may presume that the loan has met'' 
the ATR requirements.\10\ The statute generally defines a QM to mean 
any residential mortgage loan for which:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The loan does not have negative amortization, interest-
only payments, or balloon payments;
     The loan term does not exceed 30 years;
     The total points and fees generally do not exceed 3 
percent of the loan amount;
     The income and assets relied upon for repayment are 
verified and documented;
     The underwriting uses a monthly payment based on the 
maximum rate during the first five years, uses a payment schedule that 
fully amortizes the loan over the loan term, and takes into account all 
mortgage-related obligations; and
     The loan complies with any guidelines or regulations 
established by the Bureau relating to the ratio of total monthly debt 
to monthly income or alternative measures of ability to pay regular 
expenses after payment of total monthly debt.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(2)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. The ATR/QM Rule

    In January 2013, the Bureau issued the ATR/QM Rule, which amended 
Regulation Z to implement TILA's ATR requirements (January 2013 Final 
Rule).\12\ The ATR/QM Rule became effective on January 10, 2014, and 
the Bureau amended it several times through 2016.\13\ The ATR/QM Rule 
implements the statutory ATR provisions discussed above and defines 
several categories of QM loans.\14\ Under the ATR/QM Rule, a creditor 
that makes a QM loan is protected from liability presumptively or 
conclusively, depending on whether the loan is ``higher priced.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 78 FR 6408 (Jan. 30, 2013).
    \13\ See 78 FR 35429 (June 12, 2013); 78 FR 44686 (July 24, 
2013); 78 FR 60382 (Oct. 1, 2013); 79 FR 65300 (Nov. 3, 2014); 80 FR 
59944 (Oct. 2, 2015); 81 FR 16074 (Mar. 25, 2016).
    \14\ 12 CFR 1026.43(c), (e).
    \15\ The ATR/QM Rule generally defines a ``higher-priced'' 
covered transaction for General QM loans and for Temporary GSE QM 
loans to mean a first-lien mortgage with an annual percentage rate 
(APR) that exceeds the average prime offer rate (APOR) for a 
comparable transaction as of the date the interest rate is set by 
1.5 or more percentage points; or a subordinate-lien transaction 
with an APR that exceeds APOR for a comparable transaction as of the 
date the interest rate is set by 3.5 or more percentage points. 12 
CFR 1026.43(b)(4). A creditor that makes a QM loan that is not 
``higher priced'' is entitled to a conclusive presumption that it 
has complied with the ATR/QM Rule--i.e., the creditor receives a 
safe harbor. 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(1)(i). A creditor that makes a QM 
loan that is ``higher priced'' is entitled to a rebuttable 
presumption that it has complied with the ATR/QM Rule. 12 CFR 
1026.43(e)(1)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. General QM Loans
    One category of QM loans defined by the ATR/QM Rule consists of 
General QM loans. A loan is a General QM loan if:
     The loan does not have negative-amortization, interest-
only, or balloon-payment features, a term that exceeds 30 years, or 
points and fees that exceed specified limits; \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(i) through (iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The creditor underwrites the loan based on a fully 
amortizing schedule using the maximum rate permitted during the first 
five years; \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The creditor considers and verifies the consumer's income 
and debt obligations in accordance with appendix Q; \18\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The consumer's DTI ratio is no more than 43 percent, 
determined in accordance with appendix Q.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(vi).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 67940]]

    Appendix Q contains standards for calculating and verifying debt 
and income for purposes of determining whether a mortgage satisfies the 
43 percent DTI limit for General QM loans. The standards in appendix Q 
were adapted from guidelines maintained by FHA when the January 2013 
Final Rule was issued.\20\ Appendix Q addresses how to determine a 
consumer's employment-related income (e.g., income from wages, 
commissions, and retirement plans); non-employment related income 
(e.g., income from alimony and child support payments, investments, and 
property rentals); and liabilities, including recurring and contingent 
liabilities and projected obligations.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 78 FR 6408, 6527-28 (Jan. 30, 2013) (noting that appendix Q 
incorporates, with certain modifications, the definitions and 
standards in HUD Handbook 4155.1, Mortgage Credit Analysis for 
Mortgage Insurance on One- to Four-Unit Mortgage Loans).
    \21\ 12 CFR 1026, appendix Q.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Temporary GSE QM Loans
    A second, temporary category of QM loans defined by the ATR/QM 
Rule, Temporary GSE QM loans, consists of mortgages that (1) comply 
with the ATR/QM Rule's prohibitions on certain loan features and its 
limitations on points and fees \22\ and (2) are eligible to be 
purchased or guaranteed by either GSE while under the conservatorship 
of the FHFA.\23\ Unlike for General QM loans, Regulation Z does not 
prescribe a DTI limit for Temporary GSE QM loans. Thus, a loan can 
qualify as a Temporary GSE QM loan even if the DTI ratio exceeds 43 
percent, as long as the DTI ratio meets the applicable GSE's DTI 
requirements and other underwriting criteria. In addition, income, 
debt, and DTI ratios for such loans generally are verified and 
calculated using GSE standards, rather than appendix Q. The January 
2013 Final Rule provided that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition--
also known as the GSE Patch--would expire with respect to each GSE when 
that GSE exits conservatorship or on January 10, 2021, whichever comes 
first.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(i) through (iii).
    \23\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4).
    \24\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B). The ATR/QM Rule created 
several additional categories of QM loans. The ATR/QM Rule provided 
that mortgages eligible to be insured or guaranteed (as applicable) 
by HUD, VA, USDA, and RHS were QMs. 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(B) 
through (E). The ATR/QM Rule stated that these provisions would 
expire on the effective date of rules issued by each of these 
agencies pursuant to their authority under TILA to define a QM. 12 
CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(A). Because each of these agencies has issued 
such a rule, these provisions have expired. See, e.g., 24 CFR 203.19 
(HUD rule). Other categories of QM loans provide more flexible 
standards for certain loans originated by certain small creditors. 
12 CFR 1026.43(e)(5), (f); cf. 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(6) (applicable only 
to covered transactions for which the application was received 
before April 1, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The Bureau's Assessment of the ATR/QM Rule

    Section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the Bureau to assess 
each of its significant rules and orders and to publish a report of 
each assessment within five years of the effective date of the rule or 
order.\25\ The Bureau noted in the January 2013 Final Rule that its 
section 1022(d) assessment of the ATR/QM Rule would provide an 
opportunity to analyze the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and 
confirm, prior to its expiration, whether it would be appropriate to 
allow it to expire.\26\ The Bureau published its report as a result of 
its assessment on January 11, 2019 (Assessment Report).\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(d).
    \26\ 78 FR 6408, 6533-34 (Jan. 30, 2013).
    \27\ Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Ability-to-Repay and 
Qualified Mortgage Rule Assessment Report (Jan. 2019), 2019) 
(Assessment Report), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_ability-to-repay-qualified-mortgage_assessment-report.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mortgage Markets

    The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant effect on the U.S. 
economy. In the early months of the pandemic, economic activity 
contracted, millions of workers became unemployed, and mortgage markets 
were affected. In recent months, there has been a significant rebound 
in mortgage-origination activity, buoyed by historically low interest 
rates and by an increasingly large share of government and GSE-backed 
loans. However, origination activity outside the government and GSE-
backed origination channels has declined significantly, and mortgage-
credit availability for many consumers--including those who would be 
dependent on the non-QM market for financing--remains tight. The 
pandemic's impact on both the secondary market for new originations and 
on the servicing of existing mortgages is described below.
1. Secondary Market Impacts and Implications for Mortgage Origination 
Markets
    The early economic disruptions associated with the COVID-19 
pandemic restricted the flow of credit in the U.S. economy, 
particularly as tensions and uncertainty rose in mid-March 2020, and 
investors moved rapidly towards cash and government securities.\28\ The 
lack of investor demand to purchase mortgages, combined with a large 
supply of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) entering the 
market,\29\ resulted in widening spreads between the rates on a 10-year 
Treasury note and mortgage interest rates.\30\ This dynamic made it 
difficult for creditors to originate loans, as many creditors rely on 
the ability to profitably sell loans in the secondary market to 
generate the liquidity to originate new loans. This resulted in 
mortgages becoming more expensive for both homebuyers and homeowners 
looking to refinance. After the actions taken by the Federal Reserve 
Board of Governors (Board) in March 2020 to purchase agency MBS ``in 
the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning and effective 
transmission of monetary policy to broader financial conditions and the 
economy,'' \31\ market conditions have improved substantially.\32\ This 
has helped to tighten interest rate spreads, which stabilizes mortgage 
rates, resulting in a decline in mortgage rates since the Board's 
intervention and in a significant increase in refinance activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ The Quarterly CARES Act Report to Congress: Hearing Before 
the S. Comm. on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 116th Cong. 2-3 
(2020) (statement of Jerome H. Powell, Chairman, Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System).
    \29\ Agency MBS are backed by loans guaranteed by Fannie Mae, 
Freddie Mac, and the Government National Mortgage Association 
(Ginnie Mae).
    \30\ Laurie Goodman et al., Urban Inst., Housing Finance at a 
Glance, Monthly Chartbook (Mar. 26, 2020), https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/101926/housing-finance-at-a-glance-a-monthly-chartbook-march-2020.pdf.
    \31\ Press Release, Bd. of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 
Federal Reserve announces extensive new measures to support the 
economy (Mar. 23, 2020), https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20200323b.htm.
    \32\ The Quarterly CARES Act Report to Congress: Hearing Before 
the S. Comm. on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 116th Cong. 3 
(2020) (statement of Jerome H. Powell, Chairman, Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, non-agency MBS \33\ are generally perceived by investors 
as riskier than agency MBS. As a result, private capital has remained 
tight and non-agency mortgage credit, including non-QM lending, has 
declined. Issuance of non-agency MBS declined by 8.2 percent in the 
first quarter of 2020, with nearly all the transactions completed in 
January and February before the COVID-19 pandemic began to affect the 
economy significantly.\34\ Nearly all major non-QM creditors ceased 
making loans in March and April 2020. Beginning in May 2020, issuers of 
non-

[[Page 67941]]

agency MBS began to test the market with deals collateralized by non-QM 
loans largely originated prior to the pandemic, and investor demand for 
these securitizations has begun to recover. However, no securitization 
has been completed that is predominantly collateralized by non-QM loans 
originated since the pandemic began.\35\ As a result, many non-QM 
creditors--which largely depend on the ability to sell loans in the 
secondary market in order to fund new loans--have begun to resume 
originations, albeit with a tighter credit box.\36\ Prime jumbo 
financing dropped nearly 22 percent in the first quarter of 2020. Banks 
increased interest rates and narrowed the product offerings such that 
only consumers with pristine credit profiles were eligible, as these 
loans must be held in portfolio when the secondary market for non-
agency MBS contracts.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ Non-agency MBS are not backed by loans guaranteed by Fannie 
Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. This includes securities 
collateralized by non-QM loans.
    \34\ Brandon Ivey, Non-Agency MBS Issuance Slowed in First 
Quarter (Apr. 3, 2020), https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/217623-non-agency-mbs-issuance-slowed-in-first-quarter.
    \35\ Brandon Ivey, Non-Agency MBS Issuance Slow in Mid-August 
(Aug. 21, 2020), https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/218973-non-agency-mbs-issuance-slow-in-mid-august.
    \36\ Brandon Ivey, Non-Agency Mortgage Securitization Opening Up 
After Pause (May 14, 2020), https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/218034-non-agency-mortgage-securitization-opening-up-after-pause.
    \37\ Brandon Ivey, Jumbo Originations Drop Nearly 22% in First 
Quarter (May 15, 2020) https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/218028-jumbo-originations-drop-nearly-22-in-first-quarter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The GSEs and government agencies continue to play a dominant role 
in the market recovery, with the GSE share of first-lien mortgage 
originations at 65.2 percent in the second quarter of 2020, up from 
42.1 percent in the second quarter of 2019 and the FHA and VA share 
growing to 21.1 percent from 17.7 percent a year prior, according to an 
analysis by the Urban Institute. Portfolio lending declined to 12.7 
percent in the second quarter of 2020, down from 38.6 percent in the 
second quarter of 2019, and private label securitizations declined to 1 
percent from 1.6 percent a year prior.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ Laurie Goodman et al., Urban Inst., Housing Finance at a 
Glance, Monthly Chartbook (Aug. 27, 2020), https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/102776/august-chartbook-2020.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Servicing Market Impacts and Implications for Origination Markets
    In addition to the direct impact on origination volume and 
composition, the pandemic's impact on the mortgage servicing market has 
downstream effects on mortgage originations as many of the same 
entities both originate and service mortgages. Anticipating that a 
number of homeowners would struggle to pay their mortgages due to the 
pandemic and related economic impacts, Congress passed and the 
President signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 
Security Act (CARES Act) \39\ in March 2020. The CARES Act provides 
additional protections for borrowers whose mortgages are purchased or 
securitized by a GSE and certain federally backed mortgages. The CARES 
Act mandated a 60-day foreclosure moratorium for such mortgages, which 
has since been extended by the agencies until the end of the year.\40\ 
The CARES Act also allows borrowers to request up to 180 days of 
forbearance due to a COVID-19-related financial hardship, with an 
option to extend the forbearance period for an additional 180 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ Public Law 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020) (includes loans 
backed by HUD, USDA, VA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac).
    \40\ See, e.g., Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, FHFA Extends Foreclosure 
and REO Eviction Moratoriums (Aug. 27, 2020), https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/FHFA-Extends-Foreclosure-and-REO-Eviction-Moratoriums.aspx; Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 
FHA Extends Foreclosure And Eviction Moratorium For Homeowners 
Through Year End (Aug. 27, 2020), https://www.hud.gov/press/press_releases_media_advisories/HUD_No_20_134; Veterans Benefits 
Admin., Extended Foreclosure Moratorium for Borrowers Affected by 
COVID-19 (Aug. 24, 2020), https://www.benefits.va.gov/HOMELOANS/documents/circulars/26-20-30.pdf; Rural Dev., U.S. Dep't of Agric., 
Extension of Foreclosure and Eviction Moratorium for Single Family 
Housing Direct Loans (Aug. 28, 2020), https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDARD/bulletins/29c3a9e.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following the passage of the CARES Act, some mortgage servicers 
remain obligated to make some principal and interest payments to 
investors in GSE and Ginnie Mae securities, even if consumers are not 
making payments.\41\ Servicers also remain obligated to make escrowed 
real estate tax and insurance payments to local taxing authorities and 
insurance companies. While servicers are required to hold liquid 
reserves to cover anticipated advances, significantly higher-than-
expected forbearance rates over an extended period of time may lead to 
liquidity shortages, particularly among many non-bank servicers. 
According to a weekly survey from the Mortgage Bankers Association, 
while forbearance rates remain elevated at 6.32 percent for the week 
ending October 4, 2020, they have decreased since reaching their high 
of 8.55 percent on June 7, 2020.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ The GSEs typically repurchase loans out of the trust after 
they fall 120 days delinquent, after which the servicer is no longer 
required to advance principal and interest, but Ginnie Mae requires 
servicers to advance principal and interest until the default is 
resolved. On April 21, 2020, the FHFA confirmed that servicers of 
GSE loans will only be required to advance four months of mortgage 
payments, regardless of whether the GSEs repurchase the loans from 
the trust after 120 days of delinquency. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, 
FHFA Addresses Servicer Liquidity Concerns, Announces Four Month 
Advance Obligation Limit for Loans in Forbearance (Apr. 21, 2020), 
https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/FHFA-Addresses-Servicer-Liquidity-Concerns-Announces-Four-Month-Advance-Obligation-Limit-for-Loans-in-Forbearance.aspx.
    \42\ Press Release, Mortg. Bankers Ass'n, Share of Mortgage 
Loans in Forbearance Declines to 6.32% (Oct. 12, 2020), https://www.mba.org/2020-press-releases/october/share-of-mortgage-loans-in-forbearance-declines-to-632.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because many mortgage servicers also originate the loans they 
service, many creditors, as well as several warehouse providers,\43\ 
initially responded to the risk of elevated forbearances and higher-
than-expected monthly advances by imposing credit overlays--i.e., 
additional underwriting standards--for new originations. These new 
underwriting standards include more stringent requirements for non-QM, 
jumbo, and government loans.\44\ The GSEs also imposed an ``adverse 
market fee'' of 50 basis points on most refinances, effective for new 
originations delivered to the GSEs on or after December 1, 2020, to 
cover projected losses due to forbearances, the foreclosure 
moratoriums, and other default servicing expenses.\45\ However, due to 
refinance origination profits resulting from historically low interest 
rates, the leveling off in forbearance rates, and actions taken at the 
Federal level to alleviate servicer liquidity pressure,\46\ concerns 
over non-bank liquidity and related credit overlays have begun to 
ease.\47\ While the non-QM market has begun to recover, it is unclear 
how quickly non-banks who originate non-QM loans will fully return

[[Page 67942]]

to their pre-pandemic level of operations and loan production.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ Warehouse providers are creditors that provide financing to 
mortgage originators and servicers to fund and service loans.
    \44\ Maria Volkova, FHA/VA Lenders Raise Credit Score 
Requirements (Apr. 3, 2020), https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/217636-fhava-lenders-raise-fico-credit-score-requirements.
    \45\ Press Release, Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, Adverse Market 
Refinance Fee Implementation now December 1 (Aug. 25, 2020), https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/Adverse-Market-Refinance-Fee-Implementation-Now-December-1.aspx.
    \46\ On April 10, 2020, Ginnie Mae released guidance on a Pass-
Through Assistance Program whereby Ginnie Mae will provide financial 
assistance at a fixed interest rate to servicers facing a principal 
and interest shortfall as a last resort. All Participant Memorandum 
(APM) 20-03, https://www.ginniemae.gov/issuers/program_guidelines/Pages/mbsguideapmslibdisppage.aspx?ParamID=105. On April 7, 2020, 
Ginnie Mae also announced approval of a servicing advance financing 
facility, whereby mortgage servicing rights are securitized and sold 
to private investors. Press Release, Ginnie Mae approves private 
market servicer liquidity facility, https://www.ginniemae.gov/newsroom/Pages/PressReleaseDispPage.aspx?ParamID=194.
    \47\ Brandon Ivey, Non-QM Lenders Regaining Footing (July 24, 
2020), https://www.insidemortgagefinance.com/articles/218696-non-qm-lenders-regaining-footing-with-a-positive-outlook (on file).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Summary of the Rulemaking Process

    The Bureau has solicited and received substantial public and 
stakeholder input on issues related to the substance of this final 
rule. In addition to the Bureau's discussions with and communications 
from industry stakeholders, consumer advocates, other Federal 
agencies,\48\ and members of Congress, the Bureau issued requests for 
information (RFIs) in 2017 and 2018 and in July 2019 issued an advance 
notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the ATR/QM Rule (ANPR). The 
Bureau issued the Extension Proposal and the General QM Proposal on 
June 22, 2020 and the Seasoned QM Proposal on August 18, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ The Bureau has consulted with agencies including the FHFA, 
the Board, FHA, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the 
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Trade 
Commission, the National Credit Union Administration, and the 
Department of the Treasury.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. The Requests for Information

    In June 2017, the Bureau published an RFI in connection with the 
Assessment Report (Assessment RFI).\49\ In response to the Assessment 
RFI, the Bureau received approximately 480 comments from creditors, 
industry groups, consumer advocacy groups, and individuals.\50\ The 
comments addressed a variety of topics, including the General QM loan 
definition and the 43 percent DTI limit; perceived problems with, and 
potential changes and alternatives to, appendix Q; and how the Bureau 
should address the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. 
The comments expressed a range of ideas for addressing the expiration 
of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. Some commenters recommended 
making the definition permanent or extending it for various periods of 
time. Other comments stated that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
should be eliminated or permitted to expire.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ 82 FR 25246 (June 1, 2017).
    \50\ See Assessment Report, supra note 27, at appendix B 
(summarizing comments received in response to the Assessment RFI).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Beginning in January 2018, the Bureau issued a general call for 
evidence seeking comment on its enforcement, supervision, rulemaking, 
market monitoring, and financial education activities.\51\ As part of 
the call for evidence, the Bureau published requests for information 
relating to, among other things, the Bureau's rulemaking process,\52\ 
the Bureau's adopted regulations and new rulemaking authorities,\53\ 
and the Bureau's inherited regulations and inherited rulemaking 
authorities.\54\ In response to the call for evidence, the Bureau 
received comments on the ATR/QM Rule from stakeholders, including 
consumer advocacy groups and industry groups. The comments addressed a 
variety of topics, including the General QM loan definition, appendix 
Q, and the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. The comments also raised 
concerns about, among other things, the risks of allowing the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition to expire without any changes to the General QM 
loan definition or appendix Q. The concerns raised in these comments 
were similar to those raised in response to the Assessment RFI, 
discussed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ See Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Call for Evidence, 
https://www.consumerfinance.gov/policy-compliance/notice-opportunities-comment/archive-closed/call-for-evidence (last updated 
Apr. 17, 2018).
    \52\ 83 FR 10437 (Mar. 9, 2018).
    \53\ 83 FR 12286 (Mar. 21, 2018).
    \54\ 83 FR 12881 (Mar. 26, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. The ANPR

    On July 25, 2019, the Bureau issued the ANPR.\55\ The ANPR stated 
the Bureau's tentative plans to allow the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition to expire in January 2021 or after a short extension, if 
necessary, to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition away from the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition. The Bureau also stated that it was 
considering whether to propose revisions to the General QM loan 
definition in light of the potential expiration of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition and requested comments on several topics related to the 
General QM loan definition, including whether and how the Bureau should 
revise the DTI limit in the General QM loan definition; whether the 
Bureau should supplement or replace the DTI limit with another method 
for directly measuring a consumer's personal finances; whether the 
Bureau should revise appendix Q or replace it with other standards for 
calculating and verifying a consumer's debt and income; and whether, 
instead of a DTI limit, the Bureau should adopt standards that do not 
directly measure a consumer's personal finances.\56\ The Bureau 
requested comment on how much time industry would need to change its 
practices in response to any revisions the Bureau makes to the General 
QM loan definition.\57\ The Bureau received 85 comments on the ANPR 
from businesses in the mortgage industry (including creditors), 
consumer advocacy groups, elected officials, individuals, and research 
centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 84 FR 37155 (July 31, 2019).
    \56\ Id. at 37155, 37160-62.
    \57\ Id. at 37162. The Bureau stated that if the answer to this 
question depends on how the Bureau revises the definition, the 
Bureau requested answers based on alternative possible definitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The Extension Proposal, General QM Proposal, and Seasoned QM 
Proposal

    The Bureau issued the Extension Proposal and the General QM 
Proposal on June 22, 2020. In the Extension Proposal, the Bureau 
proposed to replace the January 10, 2021 sunset date of the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition with a provision that extends the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition until the effective date of final amendments to the 
General QM loan definition in Regulation Z (i.e., a final rule relating 
to the General QM Proposal). The Bureau did not propose to amend the 
conservatorship clause. The comment period for the Extension Proposal 
ended on August 10, 2020.
    In the General QM Proposal, the Bureau proposed, among other 
things, to remove the General QM loan definition's DTI limit and 
replace it with a limit based on the loan's pricing. Under the 
proposal, a loan would meet the General QM loan definition in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(2) only if the APR exceeds APOR for a comparable transaction 
by less than two percentage points as of the date the interest rate is 
set. The Bureau proposed higher thresholds for loans with smaller loan 
amounts and subordinate-lien transactions. The Bureau also proposed to 
retain the existing product-feature and underwriting requirements and 
limits on points and fees. Although the Bureau proposed to remove the 
43 percent DTI limit from the General QM loan definition, the General 
QM Proposal would require that the creditor consider and verify the 
consumer's income or assets, debt obligations, alimony, child support, 
and monthly DTI ratio or residual income. The Bureau proposed to remove 
appendix Q. To mitigate the uncertainty that may result from appendix 
Q's removal, the General QM Proposal would clarify the requirements to 
consider and verify a consumer's income, assets, debt obligations, 
alimony, and child support. The Bureau proposed to preserve the current 
threshold separating safe harbor from rebuttable presumption QMs, under 
which a loan is a safe harbor QM if its APR exceeds APOR for a 
comparable transaction by less than 1.5 percentage

[[Page 67943]]

points as of the date the interest rate is set (or by less than 3.5 
percentage points for subordinate-lien transactions).
    Although the Bureau proposed to remove the 43 percent DTI limit and 
adopt a price-based approach for the General QM loan definition, the 
Bureau also requested comment on two alternative approaches: (1) 
Retaining the DTI limit and increasing it to a specific threshold 
between 45 percent and 48 percent or (2) using a hybrid approach 
involving both pricing and a DTI limit, such as applying a DTI limit to 
loans that are above specified rate spreads. Under these alternative 
approaches, creditors would not be required to verify debt and income 
using appendix Q.
    The Bureau stated in the General QM Proposal that it expected such 
amendments would allow most loans that currently could receive QM 
status under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to receive QM status 
under the General QM loan definition if they are made after the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires.\58\ The Bureau stated that, 
as a result, the General QM Proposal would help to facilitate a smooth 
and orderly transition away from the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. 
The Bureau proposed that the effective date of a final rule relating to 
the General QM Proposal would be six months after publication of the 
final rule in the Federal Register. The revised regulations would apply 
to covered transactions for which creditors receive an application on 
or after this effective date. The comment period for the General QM 
Proposal ended on September 8, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \58\ Based on 2018 data, the Bureau estimated in the General QM 
Proposal that 943,000 High-DTI conventional loans would fall outside 
the QM definitions if there are no changes to the General QM loan 
definition prior to the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition but would fall within the General QM loan definition if 
amended as the Bureau proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 18, 2020, the Bureau issued the Seasoned QM Proposal. The 
Bureau proposed to create a new category of QMs for first-lien, fixed-
rate covered transactions that have met certain performance 
requirements over a 36-month seasoning period, are held in portfolio 
until the end of the seasoning period, comply with general restrictions 
on product features and points and fees, and meet certain underwriting 
requirements.\59\ The Bureau stated that the primary objective of the 
Seasoned QM Proposal was to ensure access to responsible, affordable 
mortgage credit by adding a Seasoned QM definition to the existing QM 
definitions. The Bureau proposed that a final rule relating to the 
Seasoned QM Proposal would take effect on the same date as a final rule 
relating to the General QM Proposal. Under the Seasoned QM Proposal--as 
under the General QM Proposal--the revised regulations would apply to 
covered transactions for which creditors receive an application on or 
after this effective date. Thus, due to the 36-month seasoning period, 
no loan would be eligible to become a Seasoned QM until at least 36 
months after the effective date of a final rule relating to the 
Seasoned QM Proposal. The comment period for the Seasoned QM Proposal 
was extended to October 1, 2020.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ 85 FR 53568 (Aug. 28, 2020).
    \60\ 85 FR 60096 (Sept. 24, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Legal Authority

    The Bureau is issuing this final rule pursuant to its authority 
under TILA and the Dodd-Frank Act. Section 1061 of the Dodd-Frank Act 
transferred to the Bureau the ``consumer financial protection 
functions'' previously vested in certain other Federal agencies, 
including the Board. The Dodd-Frank Act defines the term ``consumer 
financial protection function'' to include ``all authority to prescribe 
rules or issue orders or guidelines pursuant to any Federal consumer 
financial law, including performing appropriate functions to promulgate 
and review such rules, orders, and guidelines.'' \61\ Title X of the 
Dodd-Frank Act (including section 1061), along with TILA and certain 
subtitles and provisions of title XIV of the Dodd-Frank Act, are 
Federal consumer financial laws.\62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \61\ 12 U.S.C. 5581(a)(1)(A).
    \62\ Dodd-Frank Act section 1002(14), 12 U.S.C. 5481(14) 
(defining ``Federal consumer financial law'' to include the 
``enumerated consumer laws'' and the provisions of title X of the 
Dodd-Frank Act), Dodd-Frank Act section 1002(12)(O), 12 U.S.C. 
5481(12)(O) (defining ``enumerated consumer laws'' to include TILA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 105(a) of TILA directs the Bureau to prescribe regulations 
to carry out the purposes of TILA and states that such regulations may 
contain such additional requirements, classifications, 
differentiations, or other provisions and may further provide for such 
adjustments and exceptions for all or any class of transactions that 
the Bureau judges are necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of 
TILA, to prevent circumvention or evasion thereof, or to facilitate 
compliance therewith.\63\ A purpose of TILA is ``to assure a meaningful 
disclosure of credit terms so that the consumer will be able to compare 
more readily the various credit terms available to him and avoid the 
uninformed use of credit.'' \64\ Additionally, a purpose of TILA 
sections 129B and 129C is to assure that consumers are offered and 
receive residential mortgage loans on terms that reasonably reflect 
their ability to repay the loans and that are understandable and not 
unfair, deceptive, or abusive.\65\ As discussed in the section-by-
section analysis below, the Bureau is issuing certain provisions of 
this final rule pursuant to its rulemaking, adjustment, and exception 
authority under TILA section 105(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \63\ 15 U.S.C. 1604(a).
    \64\ 15 U.S.C. 1601(a).
    \65\ 15 U.S.C. 1639b(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 129C(b)(3)(B)(i) of TILA authorizes the Bureau to prescribe 
regulations that revise, add to, or subtract from the criteria that 
define a QM upon a finding that such regulations are necessary or 
proper to ensure that responsible, affordable mortgage credit remains 
available to consumers in a manner consistent with the purposes of TILA 
section 129C; or are necessary and appropriate to effectuate the 
purposes of TILA sections 129B and 129C, to prevent circumvention or 
evasion thereof, or to facilitate compliance with such sections.\66\ In 
addition, TILA section 129C(b)(3)(A) directs the Bureau to prescribe 
regulations to carry out the purposes of section 129C.\67\ As discussed 
in the section-by-section analysis below, the Bureau is issuing certain 
provisions of this final rule pursuant to its authority under TILA 
section 129C(b)(3)(B)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ 15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(3)(B)(i).
    \67\ 15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 1022(b)(1) of the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the Bureau to 
prescribe rules to enable the Bureau to administer and carry out the 
purposes and objectives of the Federal consumer financial laws, and to 
prevent evasions thereof.\68\ TILA and title X of the Dodd-Frank Act 
are Federal consumer financial laws. Accordingly, in this final rule, 
the Bureau is exercising its authority under Dodd-Frank Act section 
1022(b) to prescribe rules that carry out the purposes and objectives 
of TILA and title X and prevent evasion of those laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \68\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Why the Bureau Is Issuing This Final Rule

    This final rule replaces the January 10, 2021 sunset date of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition with a provision that extends the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition until the mandatory compliance date of 
final amendments to the General QM loan

[[Page 67944]]

definition in Regulation Z.\69\ The Bureau is issuing this final rule 
because it is concerned about the likely effects on the availability 
and cost of credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to 
expire before final amendments to the General QM loan definition take 
effect.\70\ The Bureau proposed amendments to the General QM loan 
definition in the General QM Proposal, which the Bureau issued on June 
22, 2020.\71\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ This final rule does not amend the conservatorship clause 
in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A), which provides that the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition will expire with respect to each GSE when that 
GSE exits conservatorship.
    \70\ As described in the section-by-section analysis below, the 
mandatory compliance date for a final rule amending the General QM 
loan definition either would be the same as the effective date of 
such a final rule or would occur after the effective date of such a 
final rule. So, under this final rule, the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would cease to be available no earlier than the effective 
date of a final rule amending the General QM loan definition.
    \71\ 85 FR 41448 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained above, the General QM Proposal would remove the 
General QM loan definition's 43 percent DTI limit and replace it with a 
price-based approach. Specifically, the General QM Proposal provides 
that a loan meets the General QM loan definition in Sec.  1026.43(e)(2) 
only if the APR exceeds the APOR for a comparable transaction by less 
than two percentage points as of the date the interest rate is set.\72\ 
The Bureau expects that the amendments the Bureau proposed in the 
General QM Proposal would, among other things, allow most loans that 
currently could receive QM status under the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition to receive QM status under the General QM loan definition if 
they are made after the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \72\ The General QM Proposal would also provide higher 
thresholds for loans with smaller loan amounts and for subordinate-
lien transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, the Bureau believes that some consumers who would have 
obtained loans under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition--and who 
would be able to obtain loans under the revised General QM loan 
definition, as separately proposed in the General QM Proposal--would 
not be able to obtain loans at all if the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition expired before final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition have gone into effect. Further, for loans absorbed by FHA 
and the private market in the absence of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition, there is a significant risk that some consumers would have 
paid more for these loans. Any such pricing effects, however, would 
depend on the characteristics of the particular loans that would be 
originated as FHA loans or in the private market.
    To prevent these likely effects on the availability and cost of 
credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to expire before 
final amendments to the General QM loan definition take effect, the 
Bureau is revising the ATR/QM Rule to provide that the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition will expire on the mandatory compliance date of a final 
rule issued by the Bureau amending the General QM loan definition or 
when the GSEs exit conservatorship, whichever comes first. The Bureau 
concludes that this extension of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's 
sunset date will ensure that responsible, affordable credit remains 
available to consumers who may have been affected if the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition were to expire before amendments to the General QM 
loan definition take effect.
    Consistent with the Extension Proposal, and for the reasons 
discussed below in the section-by-section analysis of Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B), the Bureau is not amending the conservatorship 
clause in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A).

A. Why the Bureau Created the Temporary GSE QM Loan Definition

    In the January 2013 Final Rule, the Bureau explained why it created 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. The Bureau observed that it did 
not believe that a 43 percent DTI ratio ``represents the outer boundary 
of responsible lending'' and acknowledged that historically, and even 
after the financial crisis, over 20 percent of mortgages exceeded that 
threshold.\73\ However, the Bureau stated that, as DTI ratios increase, 
``the general ability-to-repay procedures, rather than the qualified 
mortgage framework, is better suited for consideration of all relevant 
factors that go to a consumer's ability to repay a mortgage loan'' and 
that ``[o]ver the long term . . . there will be a robust and sizable 
market for prudent loans beyond the 43 percent threshold even without 
the benefit of the presumption of compliance that applies to qualified 
mortgages.'' \74\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ 78 FR 6408, 6527 (Jan. 30, 2013).
    \74\ Id. at 6527-28.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the same time, the Bureau noted that the mortgage market was 
especially fragile following the financial crisis and that GSE-eligible 
loans and federally insured or guaranteed loans made up a significant 
majority of the market.\75\ The Bureau believed that it was appropriate 
to consider for a period of time that GSE-eligible loans were 
originated with an appropriate assessment of the consumer's ability to 
repay and therefore warranted being treated as QMs.\76\ The Bureau 
believed in 2013 that this temporary category of QM loans would, in the 
near term, help to ensure access to responsible, affordable credit for 
consumers with DTI ratios above 43 percent, as well as facilitate 
compliance by creditors by promoting the use of widely recognized, 
federally related underwriting standards.\77\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \75\ Id. at 6533-34.
    \76\ Id. at 6534.
    \77\ Id. at 6533.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The January 2013 Final Rule established a sunset date for the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition of January 10, 2021 (seven years after 
that rule's effective date). The January 2013 Final Rule also stated 
that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires with respect to a GSE 
when that GSE exits conservatorship, even if that occurs before January 
10, 2021.\78\ The Bureau stated that it believed a seven-year period 
between the January 2013 Final Rule's effective date and the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition's sunset date would ``provide an adequate period 
for economic, market, and regulatory conditions to stabilize'' and ``a 
reasonable transition period to the general qualified mortgage 
definition.'' \79\ The Bureau believed that the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would benefit consumers by preserving access to credit while 
the mortgage industry adjusted to the ATR/QM Rule.\80\ The Bureau also 
explained that it structured the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to 
cover loans eligible to be purchased or guaranteed by either of the 
GSEs--regardless of whether the loans are actually purchased or 
guaranteed--to leave room for non-GSE private investors to return to 
the market and secure the same legal protections as the GSEs.\81\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \78\ See 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A)(1) and (iii)(B).
    \79\ 78 FR 6408, 6534 (Jan. 30, 2013).
    \80\ Id. at 6536.
    \81\ Id. at 6534.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau believed that, as the market recovered, the GSEs and the 
Federal agencies would be able to reduce their market presence, the 
percentage of Temporary GSE QM loans would decrease, and the market 
would shift toward General QM loans and non-QM loans above a 43 percent 
DTI ratio.\82\ The Bureau's view was that a shift towards non-QM loans 
could be supported by the non-GSE private market--i.e., by institutions 
holding such loans in portfolio, selling them in

[[Page 67945]]

whole, or securitizing them in a rejuvenated private-label securities 
(PLS) market. The Bureau noted that pursuant to its statutory 
obligations under the Dodd-Frank Act, it would assess the impact of the 
ATR/QM Rule five years after the ATR/QM Rule's effective date, and the 
assessment would provide an opportunity to analyze the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition.\83\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \82\ Id.
    \83\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. The Continued Prevalence of Temporary GSE QM Loan Originations

    The mortgage market has evolved differently than the Bureau 
predicted when it issued the January 2013 Final Rule. Contrary to the 
Bureau's expectations in 2013, the market has not shifted away from 
Temporary GSE QM originations and the private market \84\ remains 
small. As noted in the Assessment Report, Temporary GSE QM originations 
continue to represent ``a large and persistent'' share of originations 
in the conforming segment of the mortgage market, and a robust and 
sizable market to support non-QM lending has not emerged.\85\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \84\ Consistent with the Assessment Report, references to the 
private market herein include loans securitized by PLS and loans 
financed by portfolio lending by commercial banks, credit unions, 
savings banks, savings associations, mortgage banks, life insurance 
companies, finance companies, their affiliate institutions, and 
other private purchasers. See Assessment Report, supra note 27, at 
74.
    \85\ Id. at 198.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The GSEs' share of the conventional, conforming purchase-mortgage 
market was large before the ATR/QM Rule, and the Assessment Report 
found a small increase in that share since the ATR/QM Rule's effective 
date, reaching 71 percent in 2017.\86\ The Assessment Report noted 
that, at least for loans intended for sale in the secondary market, 
creditors generally offer a Temporary GSE QM loan even when a General 
QM loan could be originated.\87\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \86\ Id. at 191.
    \87\ Id. at 192.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in the Extension Proposal, the continued prevalence of 
Temporary GSE QM loan originations is contrary to the Bureau's 
expectation at the time it issued the January 2013 Final Rule.\88\ The 
Assessment Report discussed several possible reasons for the continued 
prevalence of Temporary GSE QM loan originations. The Assessment Report 
first highlighted concerns that Assessment RFI commenters expressed 
about the perceived lack of clarity in appendix Q. The Assessment 
Report found that such concerns ``may have contributed to investors'--
and at least derivatively, creditors'--preference'' for Temporary GSE 
QM loans instead of originating loans under the General QM loan 
definition.\89\ The Assessment Report noted that a second possible 
reason for the continued prevalence of Temporary GSE QM loans is that 
the GSEs were able to accommodate demand for mortgages above the 
General QM loan definition's DTI limit of 43 percent as the DTI ratio 
distribution in the market shifted upward.\90\ The Assessment Report 
found that a third possible reason for the persistence of Temporary GSE 
QM loans is the structure of the secondary market.\91\ If creditors 
adhere to the GSEs' guidelines, they gain access to a robust, highly 
liquid secondary market.\92\ In contrast, while private market 
securitizations have grown somewhat in recent years, their volume is 
still a fraction of their pre-crisis levels.\93\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \88\ Id. at 13, 190, 238.
    \89\ Id. at 193.
    \90\ Id. at 194.
    \91\ Id. at 196.
    \92\ Id.
    \93\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The Potential Market Impact of the Temporary GSE QM Loan 
Definition's Expiration

    As the Extension Proposal explained, the Bureau anticipates that 
two main types of conventional loans would be affected by the 
expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition: High-DTI GSE loans 
(those with DTI ratios above 43 percent) and GSE-eligible loans without 
appendix Q-required documentation. Leaving the current fixed sunset 
date in place would affect these loans because they are currently 
originated as QM loans due to the Temporary GSE QM loan definition but 
would not be originated as General QM loans, and may not be originated 
at all, if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to expire before 
amendments to the General QM loan definition are in effect. This final 
rule refers to these loans as potentially displaced loans.
    The Extension Proposal's analysis of the potential market impact of 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration cited data and 
analysis from the Bureau's ANPR, as described below. None of the 
comments on the Extension Proposal challenged the data or analysis from 
the ANPR or the Extension Proposal related to the potential market 
impacts of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration.\94\ The 
Bureau concludes that the data and analysis in the Extension Proposal 
and ANPR provide an appropriate estimate of the potential impact of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration for this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \94\ As noted below in the Bureau's section 1022(b) analysis, 
two consumer advocate commenters that submitted a joint comment 
letter argued for a more complete analysis of reasonable 
alternatives and that the Bureau should redo its analysis of 
benefits and costs when more data is available. However, these 
commenters did not challenge the Bureau's estimates of the potential 
market impacts of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    High-DTI GSE Loans. The ANPR provided an estimate of the number of 
loans potentially affected by the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition.\95\ In providing the estimate, the ANPR focused on 
loans that fall within the Temporary GSE QM loan definition but not the 
General QM loan definition because they have a DTI ratio above 43 
percent. This final rule refers to these loans as High-DTI GSE loans. 
Based on data from the National Mortgage Database (NMDB), the Bureau 
estimated that there were approximately 6.01 million closed-end first-
lien residential mortgage originations in the United States in 
2018.\96\ Based on supplemental data provided by the FHFA, the Bureau 
estimated that the GSEs purchased or guaranteed 52 percent--roughly 
3.12 million--of those loans.\97\ Of those 3.12 million loans, the 
Bureau estimated that 31 percent--approximately 957,000 loans--had DTI 
ratios greater than 43 percent.\98\ Thus, the Bureau estimated that as 
a result of the General QM loan definition's 43 percent DTI limit, 
approximately 957,000 loans--16 percent of all closed-end first-lien 
residential mortgage originations in 2018--were High-DTI GSE loans.\99\ 
This estimate does not include Temporary GSE QM loans that were 
eligible for purchase by either of the GSEs but were not sold to the 
GSEs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \95\ 84 FR 37155, 37158-59 (July 31, 2019).
    \96\ Id.
    \97\ Id. at 37159.
    \98\ Id. The Bureau estimates that 616,000 of these loans were 
for home purchases, and 341,000 were refinance loans. In addition, 
the Bureau estimates that the share of these loans with DTI ratios 
over 45 percent has varied over time due to changes in market 
conditions and GSE underwriting standards, rising from 47 percent in 
2016 to 56 percent in 2017, and further to 69 percent in 2018.
    \99\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Loans Without Appendix Q-Required Documentation That Are Otherwise 
GSE-Eligible. In addition to High-DTI GSE loans, an additional, smaller 
number of Temporary GSE QM loans with DTI ratios of 43 percent or less 
when calculated using GSE underwriting guides would not fall within the 
General QM loan definition because their method of documenting and 
verifying income or debt is

[[Page 67946]]

incompatible with appendix Q.\100\ These loans would also likely be 
affected if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to expire before 
amendments to the General QM loan definition are in effect. As 
explained in the Extension Proposal, the Bureau understands, from 
extensive public feedback and its own experience, that appendix Q does 
not specifically address whether and how to document and include 
certain forms of income. The Bureau understands these concerns are 
particularly acute for self-employed consumers, consumers with part-
time employment, and consumers with irregular or unusual income 
streams.\101\ As a result, these consumers' access to credit may be 
affected if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to expire before 
amendments to the General QM loan definition are in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \100\ Id. at 37159 n.58. Where these types of loans have DTI 
ratios above 43 percent, they would be captured in the estimate 
above relating to High-DTI GSE loans.
    \101\ For example, in qualitative responses to the Bureau's 
Lender Survey conducted as part of the Assessment Report, 
underwriting for self-employed consumers was one of the most 
frequently reported sources of difficulty in originating mortgages 
using appendix Q. These concerns were also raised in comments 
submitted in response to the Assessment RFI, noting that appendix Q 
is ambiguous with respect to how to treat income for consumers who 
are self-employed, have irregular income, or want to use asset 
depletion as income. See Assessment Report, supra note 27, at 200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau's analysis of the market under the baseline focuses on 
High-DTI GSE loans because the Bureau estimates that most potentially 
displaced loans are High-DTI GSE loans. The Bureau also lacks the loan-
level documentation and underwriting data necessary to estimate with 
precision the number of potentially displaced loans that do not fall 
within the other General QM loan requirements and are not High-DTI GSE 
loans. However, the Assessment Report did not find evidence of 
substantial numbers of loans in the non-GSE-eligible jumbo market being 
displaced when appendix Q verification requirements became effective in 
2014.\102\ Further, the Assessment Report found evidence of only a 
limited reduction in the approval rate of self-employed applicants for 
non-GSE eligible mortgages.\103\ Based on this evidence, along with 
qualitative comparisons of GSE and appendix Q documentation 
requirements and available data on the prevalence of borrowers with 
non-traditional or difficult-to-document income (e.g., self-employed 
borrowers, retired borrowers, those with irregular income streams), the 
Bureau estimates this second category of potentially displaced loans is 
considerably less numerous than the category of High-DTI GSE loans. 
Nevertheless, the Bureau believes that, for some borrowers, there would 
be a meaningful impact on their access to credit because their method 
of documenting and verifying income or debt is incompatible with 
appendix Q.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \102\ Id. at 107 (``For context, total jumbo purchase 
originations increased from an estimated 108,700 to 130,200 between 
2013 and 2014, based on nationally representative NMDB data.'').
    \103\ Id. at 118 (``The Application Data indicates that, 
notwithstanding concerns that have been expressed about the 
challenge of documenting and verifying income for self-employed 
borrowers under the General QM standard and the documentation 
requirements contained in appendix Q to the Rule, approval rates for 
non-High-DTI, non-GSE eligible self-employed borrowers have 
decreased only slightly, by two percentage points.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional Effects on Loans Not Displaced. The Extension Proposal 
explained that, in addition to potentially displaced loans, loans that 
continue to be originated as QM loans after the expiration of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition would also be affected. After the 
sunset date, absent changes to the General QM loan definition, all 
loans with DTI ratios at or below 43 percent that are or would have 
been purchased and guaranteed as GSE loans under the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition--approximately 2.16 million loans in 2018--and that 
continue to be originated as General QM loans after the provision 
expires would be required to verify income and debts according to 
appendix Q, rather than only according to GSE guidelines. Given the 
concerns raised about appendix Q's ambiguity and lack of flexibility, 
this would likely entail both increased documentation burden for some 
consumers as well as increased costs or time-to-origination for 
creditors on some loans.\104\ Commenters on the Extension Proposal did 
not offer additional estimates regarding the number of potentially 
displaced loans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \104\ See part V.B for additional discussion of concerns raised 
about appendix Q.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Focusing on High-DTI GSE loans, the Bureau expects that these loans 
will continue to comprise a significant proportion of mortgage 
originations through January 10, 2021, when the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition was scheduled to expire.\105\ The ANPR identified several 
ways that the market for loans that would have been High-DTI GSE loans 
may respond to the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition.\106\ In doing so, the Bureau made assumptions about the 
future behavior of certain mortgage market participants: (1) That there 
is no change to the GSEs' current policy that does not allow purchase 
of non-QM loans; and (2) that creditors' preference for making 
Temporary GSE QM loans, and investors' preference for purchasing such 
loans, is driven in part by the safe harbor provided to such loans and 
that these preferences would continue at least for some creditors and 
investors.\107\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \105\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \106\ Id.
    \107\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau concludes that this analysis from the ANPR continues to 
provide an appropriate assessment of how the market for loans that 
would have been High-DTI GSE loans may have responded to the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition's expiration prior to the effective date of 
amendments to the General QM definition. Therefore, the Bureau expects 
that many consumers who would have obtained High-DTI GSE loans would 
instead have obtained FHA-insured loans because FHA currently insures 
loans with DTI ratios up to 57 percent (with compensating 
factors).\108\ The number of loans that would have moved to FHA would 
depend on FHA's willingness and ability to insure such loans, on 
whether the FHA mortgage payment would be affordable to the consumer 
relative to any options in the private mortgage market, on whether FHA 
continues to treat all loans that it insures as QMs under its own QM 
rule, and on how many High-DTI GSE loans exceed FHA's loan-amount 
limit.\109\ For example, the Extension Proposal estimated that, in 
2018, 11 percent of High-DTI GSE loans exceeded FHA's loan-amount 
limit.\110\ The Bureau considers this an outer limit on the share of 
High-DTI GSE loans that could have moved to FHA.\111\ As explained in 
the Extension Proposal, the Bureau expects that loans that would have 
been originated as FHA loans instead of under the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would generally have cost materially more for many 
consumers.\112\ The Bureau also expects

[[Page 67947]]

that some consumers offered FHA loans might have chosen not to take out 
a mortgage because of these higher costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \108\ Id. In fiscal year 2019, approximately 57 percent of FHA-
insured purchase mortgages had a DTI ratio above 43 percent. U.S. 
Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., Annual Report to Congress Regarding the 
Financial Status of the FHA Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund, Fiscal 
Year 2019, at 33 (Nov. 14, 2019), https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/Housing/documents/2019FHAAnnualReportMMIFund.pdf.
    \109\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \110\ Id. In 2018, FHA's county-level maximum loan limits ranged 
from $271,050 to $721,050. See U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., FHA 
Mortgage Limits, https://entp.hud.gov/idapp/html/hicostlook.cfm 
(last visited Oct. 17, 2020).
    \111\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \112\ Interest rates and insurance premiums on FHA loans 
generally feature less risk-based pricing than conventional loans, 
charging more similar rates and premiums to all consumers. As a 
result, they are likely to cost more than conventional loans for 
consumers with stronger credit scores and larger down payments. 
Consistent with this pricing differential, consumers with higher 
credit scores and larger down payments chose FHA loans relatively 
rarely in 2018 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data on mortgage 
originations. See Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Introducing New and 
Revised Data Points in HMDA (Aug. 2019), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_new-revised-data-points-in-hmda_report.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is also possible that some consumers who would have sought High-
DTI GSE loans would have been able to obtain loans in the private 
market.\113\ The ANPR noted that the number of loans absorbed by the 
private market would likely depend, in part, on whether actors in the 
private market are willing to assume the legal and credit risk 
associated with funding High-DTI GSE loans as non-QM loans or small-
creditor portfolio QM loans \114\ and, if so, whether actors in the 
private market would offer more competitive pricing or terms.\115\ For 
example, as explained in the Extension Proposal, the Bureau estimates 
that 55 percent of High-DTI GSE loans in 2018 had credit scores at or 
above 680 and loan-to-value (LTV) ratios at or below 80 percent--credit 
characteristics traditionally considered attractive to actors in the 
private market.\116\ The ANPR also noted that there are certain built-
in costs to FHA loans--namely, mortgage insurance premiums--which could 
be a basis for competition and that depository institutions in recent 
years have shied away from originating and servicing FHA loans due to 
the obligations and risks associated with such loans.\117\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \113\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \114\ See 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(5) (extending QM status to certain 
portfolio loans originated by certain small creditors). In addition, 
section 101 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 
Protection Act (EGRRCPA), Public Law 115-174, section 101, 132 Stat. 
1296, 1297 (2018), amended TILA to add a safe harbor for small-
creditor portfolio loans. See 15 U.S.C. 1639c(b)(2)(F).
    \115\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \116\ Id.
    \117\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, the Assessment Report found that a robust market for non-
QM loans above the 43 percent DTI limit has not materialized as the 
Bureau had predicted. Therefore, there is limited capacity in the non-
QM market to provide access to credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition were to expire before a final rule amending the General QM 
loan definition has taken effect.\118\ As described above, the non-QM 
market has been further reduced by the recent economic disruptions 
associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, with most mortgage credit now 
available in the QM lending space. The Bureau acknowledges that the 
slow development of the non-QM market, and the recent economic 
disruptions that may significantly hinder its development in the near 
term, may further reduce access to credit outside the QM space.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \118\ Assessment Report, supra note 27, at 198.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the ANPR noted that some consumers who would have sought 
High-DTI GSE loans may adapt to changing options and make different 
choices, such as adjusting their borrowing to result in a lower DTI 
ratio.\119\ However, some consumers who would have sought High-DTI GSE 
loans may not have been able to obtain loans at all.\120\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \119\ 84 FR 37155, 37159 (July 31, 2019).
    \120\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Why the Bureau Is Extending the Temporary GSE QM Loan Definition

    The Bureau anticipates that if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
expired as currently scheduled and there are no changes to the General 
QM loan definition prior to expiration, some High-DTI GSE loans and 
loans without appendix Q-required documentation that are otherwise GSE-
eligible would not be made and some would cost consumers materially 
more.\121\ In the General QM Proposal, the Bureau proposed to remove 
the General QM loan definition's DTI limit and replace it with a limit 
based on the loan's pricing. Under the General QM Proposal, a loan 
would meet the General QM loan definition only if the APR exceeds the 
APOR for a comparable transaction by less than two percentage points as 
of the date the interest rate is set.\122\ The Bureau expects that the 
amendments the Bureau proposed in the General QM Proposal would, among 
other things, allow most loans that currently could receive QM status 
under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to receive QM status under 
the General QM loan definition if they are made after the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition expires.\123\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \121\ See supra part V.C.
    \122\ The General QM Proposal would preserve the current 
threshold separating safe harbor from rebuttable presumption QMs, 
under which a loan is a safe harbor QM if its APR exceeds APOR for a 
comparable transaction by less than 1.5 percentage points as of the 
date the interest rate is set (or by less than 3.5 percentage points 
for subordinate-lien transactions).
    \123\ As described above in part III.C, the Bureau also recently 
issued the Seasoned QM Proposal, which would create a new category 
of QMs for first-lien, fixed-rate covered transactions that have met 
certain performance requirements over a 36-month seasoning period, 
are held in portfolio until the end of the seasoning period, comply 
with general restrictions on product features and points and fees, 
and meet certain underwriting requirements. 85 FR 53568 (Aug. 28, 
2020). The Bureau notes that the Seasoned QM Proposal, if finalized, 
would not address the short-term access to credit concerns described 
here. The Seasoned QM Proposal would not address the likely effects 
on the availability and cost of credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition were to expire before final amendments to the General QM 
loan definition take effect, because among other things, as 
described in the Seasoned QM Proposal, the Seasoned QM definition 
would take effect at the same time that final amendments to the 
General QM loan definition take effect. Id. at 53569.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau is concerned about the likely effects on the 
availability and cost of credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
were to expire before final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition take effect. As explained in the Extension Proposal, while 
the Bureau can estimate the outer limit of the share of High-DTI GSE 
loans that could be originated by the FHA, the Bureau cannot estimate 
with precision the extent to which loans would be absorbed by the FHA 
or the characteristics of the particular loans that might be 
absorbed.\124\ Similarly, while the Bureau also anticipates that the 
private market might absorb additional loans that would have been High-
DTI GSE loans, the Bureau is uncertain as to the private market's 
capacity to absorb these loans in the short term--as a robust market 
for non-QM loans above the 43 percent DTI limit has not materialized as 
the Bureau had predicted and as the non-QM market has been further 
reduced by the current economic disruptions associated with the COVID-
19 pandemic. And, as noted, the Bureau lacks the loan-level 
documentation and underwriting data necessary to estimate with 
precision the number of potentially displaced loans that do not fall 
within the General QM loan definition due to appendix Q-related issues 
and are not High-DTI GSE loans. Despite these uncertainties, it is 
likely that some consumers who would have obtained loans under the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition--and who would be able to obtain loans 
under the revised General QM loan definition, as separately proposed by 
the Bureau--would not have been able to obtain loans at all if the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition were allowed to expire before final 
amendments to the General QM loan definition have gone

[[Page 67948]]

into effect.\125\ Further, for loans absorbed by the FHA and the 
private market in the absence of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition, 
there is a significant risk that some consumers would have paid more 
for these loans, although any pricing effects would depend on the 
characteristics of the particular loans that would be originated as FHA 
loans or in the private market.\126\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \124\ Assuming they are still originated, potentially displaced 
loans made with high LTVs or to consumers with low credit scores are 
the least likely to be absorbed by the private market, and thus most 
likely to be absorbed by the FHA. The exact characteristics of loans 
likely to be absorbed by the FHA would depend on the relative 
pricing and underwriting requirements of FHA and private market 
alternatives.
    \125\ See supra part V.C, noting that some consumers who would 
have sought High-DTI GSE loans may make different choices, such as 
by adjusting their borrowing to result in a lower DTI ratio.
    \126\ The Assessment Report noted that, while there did not 
appear to be a marked change in the relative price of non-QM High-
DTI loans immediately following the implementation of the ATR/QM 
Rule, other research has found a 25 basis point premium for non-QM 
High-DTI loans in more recent years. Assessment Report, supra note 
27, at 121-22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To prevent these likely effects on the availability and cost of 
credit if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expired before final 
amendments to the General QM loan definition take effect, the Bureau is 
extending the Temporary GSE QM loan definition until the mandatory 
compliance date of a final rule issued by the Bureau amending the 
General QM loan definition, or when the GSEs exit conservatorship, 
whichever comes first. As discussed below in the section-by-section 
analysis, commenters to the Extension Proposal were supportive of the 
Bureau's proposal to extend the sunset of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition rather than allowing it to expire on January 10, 2021. The 
Bureau is issuing this extension to ensure that responsible, affordable 
credit remains available to consumers who may be affected if the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires before these amendments take 
effect.\127\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \127\ The Bureau expects to finalize a rule amending the General 
QM loan definition, at which point the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would expire under this final rule. However, the Bureau 
notes that in the unlikely event that such a rule is not finalized 
and the current General QM loan definition remains in place, the 
Bureau would revisit the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and take 
appropriate action. As noted above, the Bureau does not intend to 
maintain indefinitely a presumption that loans eligible for purchase 
or guarantee by either of the GSEs have been originated with 
appropriate consideration of the consumer's ability to repay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau stated in the January 2013 Final Rule that, for a 
limited period of time and while the GSEs are under conservatorship of 
the FHFA, it believed that GSE-eligible loans are originated with 
appropriate consideration of ability to repay.\128\ Under current 
conditions, the Bureau finds that it is appropriate to extend that 
presumption for a short period until the mandatory compliance date of 
Bureau amendments to the General QM loan definition, in light of 
concerns about effects on the availability and cost of credit if the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires before a rule revising the 
General QM loan definition takes effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \128\ 78 FR 6408, 6534 (Jan. 30, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the conservatorship clause in the current rule, the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition expires with respect to a GSE when that GSE 
exits conservatorship, even if that occurs before January 10, 2021. 
Consistent with the Extension Proposal, this final rule does not amend 
this provision. The Bureau addresses the comments it received related 
to the conservatorship clause in the section-by-section analysis of 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B), below.

VI. Section-by-Section Analysis

1026.43 Minimum Standards for Transactions Secured by a Dwelling

43(e) Qualified Mortgages
43(e)(4) Qualified Mortgage Defined--Special Rules
43(e)(4)(iii) Sunset of Special Rules
43(e)(4)(iii)(B)
    Section 1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) provides that the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition is available only for covered transactions consummated 
on or before January 10, 2021.\129\ The Bureau proposed to revise Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) to state that the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition is available only for covered transactions consummated on or 
before the effective date of a final rule issued by the Bureau amending 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(2). Proposed Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) also would 
have stated that the Bureau will amend Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) as 
of that effective date to reflect the new status. The Bureau also 
proposed conforming amendments to comment 43(e)(4)-3. The Bureau did 
not propose to amend the conservatorship clause in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A). This final rule amends Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) largely as the Bureau proposed, with minor 
modifications as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \129\ Section 1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) also applies to the other 
temporary QM loan definitions in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4). However, as 
noted above in part II, these other temporary QM loan definitions 
have expired because the relevant Federal agencies have issued their 
own QM rules. See, e.g., 24 CFR 203.19 (HUD rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments Received
    The Bureau received 29 comments in response to the Extension 
Proposal from industry, consumer advocates, and others. All commenters 
supported extending the Temporary GSE QM loan definition. No commenter 
recommended that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expire earlier 
than the effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition. Many commenters stated that they agreed with the Bureau 
that extending the Temporary GSE QM loan definition would ensure that 
responsible, affordable credit remains available to consumers who may 
be affected if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires before 
these amendments take effect.
    Several commenters recommended that the Bureau finalize the 
Extension Proposal as proposed. Several other commenters recommended 
modifications to the proposal, as described and organized below based 
on the topic of concern.
    Gap in coverage. Several industry commenters recommended that the 
Bureau modify the proposed sunset date to prevent a gap around the 
effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition in 
which neither the Temporary GSE QM loan definition nor the revised 
General QM loan definition would apply to certain loans. These 
commenters noted that, under the Extension Proposal, the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition would be available only for covered transactions 
consummated on or before the effective date of final amendments to the 
General QM loan definition. At the same time, as these commenters 
noted, the General QM Proposal provided that the revised General QM 
loan definition would apply to covered transactions for which creditors 
receive an application on or after the effective date of the final 
amendments to the General QM loan definition. These commenters stated 
that, as a result, when a creditor receives an application before the 
effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition, 
but the loan is consummated after that effective date, neither the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition nor the revised General QM loan 
definition would apply. Consequently, loans that would have been QMs 
under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition--and that would have been 
eligible for QM status under the revised General QM loan definition--
would not be eligible for QM status under either the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition (because the loan was consummated after the effective 
date of a final rule amending the General QM loan definition) or the 
revised General QM loan definition (because the creditor received the 
application before the effective date of a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition).

[[Page 67949]]

    These industry commenters recommended several options to prevent 
such a gap. Several commenters suggested that the Bureau prevent this 
gap by having the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expire six months 
after the effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition, rather than on the effective date. This approach would 
create an overlap period in which creditors could originate QMs under 
either the Temporary GSE QM loan definition or the revised General QM 
loan definition. Two commenters suggested that the Bureau align the 
sunset date with the effective date of final amendments to the General 
QM loan definition based on the date the creditor received the 
consumer's application. Under this approach, the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would be available only for covered transactions for which 
the creditor receives the consumer's application before the effective 
date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition, and the 
revised General QM loan definition would apply to covered transactions 
for which creditors receive an application on or after this effective 
date. One commenter recommended that the Bureau adopt this approach but 
provide that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition would cease to be 
available six months after the effective date of final amendments to 
the General QM loan definition.
    Two industry commenters opposed aligning the sunset date of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition with the effective date of final 
amendments to the General QM loan definition based on the application 
date. These commenters argued that this standard would be unclear 
because ``application'' is not clearly defined for purposes of the ATR/
QM Rule. One of these commenters recommended that, if the Bureau 
adopted this approach, it clarify that ``application'' has the same 
definition as under the Bureau's TILA-RESPA \130\ Integrated Disclosure 
Rule (TRID). The other commenter stated that the Bureau should not 
align the sunset date of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition with the 
effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition 
based on the application date, because creditors do not typically 
maintain a non-TRID application date in their systems. This commenter 
also stated that QM status is not determined at the time of 
application, so the proposed approach may create problems if a loan 
application is received prior to the sunset date but is no longer 
eligible for purchase or guarantee by the GSEs at the time of 
consummation after the sunset date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \130\ Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (RESPA), 
Public Law 93-533, 88 Stat. 1274 (1974).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One industry commenter suggested that the Bureau could prevent this 
gap in coverage by aligning the sunset date with the effective date of 
a final rule amending the General QM loan definition based on the date 
of consummation. Under this approach, the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition would be available for covered transactions consummated 
before the effective date of a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition (as the Bureau proposed), and then, in that final rule, the 
Bureau would provide that the revised General QM loan definition would 
apply to covered transactions consummated on or after the effective 
date. One industry commenter opposed this approach, stating that it 
would effectively reduce the length of the implementation period for 
the revised General QM loan definition. One industry commenter also 
suggested that both the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and the 
revised General QM loan definition be available for loans in process on 
the effective date of the revised General QM loan definition.
    Other comments on the sunset date. As noted above, several industry 
commenters suggested that the Bureau prevent a gap around the effective 
date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition by having 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expire six months after the 
effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan definition, 
rather than on the effective date. Several industry commenters and one 
individual commenter also recommended this approach to address a 
different concern. These commenters stated that an overlap between the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition and the revised General QM loan 
definition would help facilitate the implementation of the revised 
General QM loan definition.
    Many of these commenters noted that creditors will need to update 
their business processes and information technology systems as they 
prepare to comply with the revised General QM loan definition. These 
commenters stated that an overlap would reduce the likelihood that 
unforeseen implementation problems arising after the effective date of 
the General QM amendments could disrupt creditors' ability to originate 
loans. One of these commenters also noted that secondary market 
participants will be adjusting to the revised definition. Several of 
these commenters stated that the COVID-19 pandemic is straining 
creditors' resources and personnel, making it more difficult for them 
to adapt to the new definition. A few of these commenters stated that 
an overlap period would reduce the potential that a revised General QM 
loan definition could disrupt the mortgage market and affect credit 
access due to unforeseen changes in the economy or the mortgage market 
due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Another commenter stated that an overlap would protect creditors 
that are affected by clarifications the Bureau makes to a final rule 
amending the General QM loan definition after it takes effect. With 
respect to how long the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and the 
revised General QM loan definition would overlap, commenters suggested 
periods between four months and one year.
    In addition to the comments noted above, three other commenters 
recommended longer extensions of the sunset date to facilitate 
implementation of a final rule amending the General QM loan definition. 
An individual commenter requested a two-year extension of the sunset 
date until January 10, 2023. An industry commenter recommended an 
extension of 18 to 24 months, at a minimum.\131\ Another industry 
commenter suggested that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expire in 
January 2022 or the effective date of a final rule amending the General 
QM loan definition, whichever is later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \131\ These commenters seemed to assume that a final rule issued 
by the Bureau amending the General QM loan definition would take 
effect sooner than 18 to 24 months from January 10, 2021, perhaps in 
light of the Bureau's statement in the Extension NPRM that it does 
not intend to issue a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition early enough for it to take effect before April 1, 2021. 
85 FR 41448, 41456 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to the general concerns about implementation noted 
above, two industry commenters stated that, in determining when the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition should expire, the Bureau should 
consider the GSEs' recently mandated changes to the Uniform Residential 
Loan Application (URLA). The GSEs are requiring creditors to use a 
redesigned version of the URLA for all loan applications received on or 
after March 1, 2021. The GSEs have stated that beginning on March 1, 
2022, they will no longer accept the previous URLA.\132\ The two 
industry commenters stated that implementing the new URLA will require 
creditors to undertake extensive systems changes. One of these industry

[[Page 67950]]

commenters stated that requiring creditors to adapt to a revised 
General QM loan definition in the first six months of 2021 would 
compound this burden significantly. This commenter recommended that the 
Bureau extend the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to expire six months 
after the revised General QM loan definition. The other commenter 
requested that the Bureau address this concern by extending the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition to expire on March 1, 2022, or on the 
effective date of a final rule amending the General QM loan definition, 
whichever is later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \132\ Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, Extended URLA Implementation 
Timeline (Apr. 14, 2020), https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/media/22661/display.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two consumer advocate commenters that submitted a joint comment 
letter recommended that the Bureau extend the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition indefinitely in this rulemaking and determine its sunset 
date in a final rule amending the General QM loan definition. These 
commenters also recommended that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
remain in effect until the latest of the following events: A date 
certain that is no earlier than January 2022 and preferably in 2023; 
six months after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency; or the 
effective date of a final rule amending the General QM loan definition. 
These commenters stated that determining the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition's sunset date in a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition, instead of in this rulemaking, would allow the Bureau to 
adjust its approach to the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition based on the comments the Bureau receives on the General QM 
Proposal regarding the implementation of the General QM loan 
definition. In the commenters' view, this would better ensure a smooth 
transition to any revised General QM loan definition. The commenters 
stated that the Bureau would tie its hands by linking the sunset date 
with the effective date of a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition; that doing so would create greater uncertainty for 
creditors; and that uncertainty is destabilizing and tends to reduce 
access to credit. These commenters also stated that the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition should remain in place until the Bureau assesses the 
impact of the movement for racial justice on mortgage markets as well 
as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including the decline of the 
non-QM market and creditors' increasing reliance on GSE and FHA 
loans.\133\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \133\ The Bureau addresses this group's comments on the 
conservatorship clause in the subsection below and on the Bureau's 
section 1022 analysis in part VII.A.1 below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An industry commenter recommended that the Bureau not extend the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition indefinitely. The commenter stated 
that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition provides significant 
advantages to the GSEs by codifying their underwriting parameters into 
the QM definition, which, according to the commenter, produces 
excessive reliance on the GSEs while stifling innovation by other 
market participants. The commenter also recommended that the Bureau not 
extend the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to a date certain. In the 
commenter's view, because the effective date of final amendments to the 
General QM loan definition is not yet known, extending the definition 
to a date certain could result in a sunset date that is too early 
(causing a gap between the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and a 
revised General QM loan definition) or too late (causing the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition to remain in place longer than necessary, 
resulting in the perpetuation of the concerns relating to an indefinite 
extension that the commenter identified).
    Several industry commenters recommended that, in a final rule 
amending the General QM loan definition, the Bureau adopt a longer 
implementation period--i.e., the time period after such a final rule is 
issued and before creditors are required to transition from the current 
General QM loan definition to the revised General QM loan definition--
than the six-month period the Bureau proposed. One industry commenter 
requested that the Bureau provide a 90-day grace period for compliance 
with the revised definition. The Bureau considers these to be comments 
on the General QM Proposal and best addressed in that rulemaking. The 
Bureau will consider these comments as it develops a final rule to 
amend the General QM loan definition.
    Conservatorship clause. Three industry commenters and the two 
consumer advocacy groups that submitted a joint comment letter 
recommended that the Bureau remove the conservatorship clause from 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(ii)(A)(1). Removing the conservatorship clause would 
result in the Temporary GSE QM loan definition not expiring with 
respect to a GSE if that GSE exited conservatorship. These commenters 
noted that the status of the conservatorships is outside of the 
Bureau's control and stated that, if one or both conservatorships were 
to end on short notice, the sudden expiration of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition would create turmoil in the market and reduce access to 
credit. Two industry commenters stated that the Bureau should clarify 
in advance of the end of conservatorship what steps the Bureau would 
take with respect to the Temporary GSE QM loan definition if the 
conservatorships were to end.
The Final Rule
    This final rule amends Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) to provide that, 
unless otherwise expired under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(A),\134\ the 
special rules in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) are available only for covered 
transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's application 
before the mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued by the 
Bureau amending Sec.  1026.43(e)(2).\135\ Revised Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) also states that the Bureau will amend Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) prior to that mandatory compliance date to 
reflect the new status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \134\ 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(A) states that each of the 
special rules described in 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(B) through (E)--
which provide that mortgages eligible to be insured or guaranteed 
(as applicable) by HUD, VA, USDA, and RHS are QMs--shall expire on 
the effective date of a rule issued by each respective agency 
pursuant to its authority under TILA section 129C(b)(3)(ii) to 
define a QM.
    \135\ The Bureau uses the term ``mandatory compliance date'' 
because this is the date on which creditors that wish to originate 
General QM loans will be required to comply with the revised General 
QM loan definition. As of the mandatory compliance date, the current 
General QM loan definition will no longer be available. The Bureau's 
use of the term does not imply that creditors are required to use 
the General QM loan definition to comply with the ATR/QM Rule's 
ability-to-repay requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This final rule also makes conforming changes to comment 43(e)(4)-
3. As revised, comment 43(e)(4)-3 explains that the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition applies only to loans for which the creditor receives 
the consumer's application before the mandatory compliance date of a 
final rule issued by the Bureau amending Sec.  1026.43(e)(2), 
regardless of whether Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any limited-life 
regulatory entity succeeding the charter of either) continues to 
operate under the conservatorship or receivership of the FHFA. The 
comment also explains that, accordingly, the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition is available only for covered transactions: (i) That are 
consummated on or before the date Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any 
limited-life regulatory entity succeeding the charter of either), 
respectively, cease to operate under the conservatorship or 
receivership of the FHFA and (ii) that are transactions for

[[Page 67951]]

which the creditor receives the consumer's application before the 
mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued by the Bureau amending 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(2), as provided by Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii). This 
final rule also revises this comment to note that the Bureau will amend 
this comment prior to the mandatory compliance date of a final rule 
issued by the Bureau amending Sec.  1026.43(e)(2) to reflect the new 
status.\136\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \136\ The Bureau notes that the proposed extension to the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition's sunset date does not apply to the 
temporary points-and-fees cure provision in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(3)(iii), which is also set to expire on January 10, 2021. 
Comments on the expiration date for the temporary points-and-fees 
cure provision at Sec.  1026.43(e)(3)(iii) are outside the scope of 
this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau has made two substantive modifications to the proposal. 
The first is that this final rule links the expiration of the Temporary 
GSE QM loan definition to the ``mandatory compliance date'' of a final 
rule amending the General QM loan definition instead of to the 
``effective date'' of such a final rule. Specifically, under this final 
rule, the Temporary GSE QM loan definition will be available only for 
covered transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's 
application before the ``mandatory compliance date'' of a final rule 
issued by the Bureau amending the General QM loan definition, rather 
than covered transactions consummated on or before the ``effective 
date'' of such a final rule, as the Bureau proposed.
    The Bureau is not adopting an ``overlap period'' in this final rule 
by keeping the Temporary GSE QM loan definition in effect after the 
date creditors are required to transition from the current General QM 
loan definition to the revised General QM loan definition, as some 
commenters suggested. This is because, in a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition, after considering the comments in that 
rulemaking, the Bureau intends to establish an implementation period--
i.e., the time period after such a final rule is issued and before 
creditors are required to transition from the current General QM loan 
definition to the revised General QM loan definition--that provides the 
amount of time necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition 
to a revised General QM loan definition. Establishing an ``overlap 
period'' that extends after the date creditors are required to 
transition from the current General QM loan definition to the revised 
General QM loan definition would keep the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition in place longer than necessary to facilitate a smooth and 
orderly transition to a revised General QM loan definition. The Bureau 
seeks to maintain the Temporary GSE QM loan definition only as long as 
necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition to a revised 
General QM loan definition, and no longer, because the Bureau concludes 
that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition has certain negative effects 
on the mortgage market, including stifling innovation and the 
development of competitive private-sector approaches to underwriting. 
The Bureau further concludes that, as long as the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition continues to be in effect, the non-GSE private market is 
less likely to rebound and that the existence of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition may be limiting the development of the non-GSE private 
market. For these reasons, the Bureau concludes that it is appropriate 
for the Temporary GSE QM loan definition to remain in place no longer 
than the date creditors are required to transition from the current 
General QM loan definition to the revised General QM loan definition.
    However, while the Bureau is not adopting an ``overlap period'' in 
this final rule by keeping the Temporary GSE QM loan definition in 
effect after the date creditors are required to transition from the 
current General QM loan definition to the revised General QM loan 
definition, the Bureau may choose, in a final rule amending the General 
QM loan definition, to adopt an ``optional early compliance period'' 
whereby the revised General QM loan definition would become available 
before the date creditors are required to transition from the current 
General QM loan definition to the revised General QM loan definition. 
Such an approach would accommodate those creditors that are able to 
transition to, and wish to start using, the revised General QM loan 
definition sooner than the date creditors are required to make the 
transition, a date the Bureau expects to select based on the time 
needed for the industry as a whole to make the transition. If the 
Bureau adopts such an optional early compliance period in a final rule 
amending the General QM loan definition, the revised General QM loan 
definition would become available on the ``effective date'' of such a 
final rule; it would coexist with the current General QM loan 
definition for a period of time; and then the current General QM loan 
definition would expire on the ``mandatory compliance date'' of such a 
final rule.\137\ If the Bureau does not adopt an optional early 
compliance period in a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition, the ``effective date'' and ``mandatory compliance date'' 
would be the same date. In this case, the revision from ``effective 
date'' to ``mandatory compliance date'' in this final rule would have 
no substantive effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \137\ For example, the Bureau adopted an optional early 
compliance period in 2017 amendments to TRID. 82 FR 37656, 37656 
(Aug. 11, 2017) (``The final rule is effective October 10, 2017. 
However, the mandatory compliance date is October 1, 2018.''); see 
also id. at 37763-37765. The details of an optional early compliance 
period for the General QM loan definition may differ from the 2017 
TRID amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau concludes that, to preserve the possibility of adopting 
an optional early compliance period in a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition, it is appropriate for the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition to expire on the mandatory compliance date of a final 
rule amending the General QM loan definition (i.e., the end of the 
optional early compliance period) instead of on the effective date of 
such a final rule (i.e., the beginning of the optional early compliance 
period). The Bureau expects that, if it were to adopt an optional early 
compliance period in a final rule amending the General QM loan 
definition, some creditors may not be ready to transition away from the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition and to the revised General QM loan 
definition on the effective date. In contrast, because the Bureau 
intends to establish an adequate implementation period (as described 
above), it expects creditors to be ready to do so by the mandatory 
compliance date. Therefore, linking the expiration of the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition to the mandatory compliance date of such a final 
rule will best ensure a smooth and orderly transition away from the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition and toward the revised General QM loan 
definition.
    Gap in coverage. The second substantive modification to the 
proposal addresses the concern several commenters raised about the gap 
around the effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition when, under the proposal, neither the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition nor the revised General QM loan definition would have 
applied. This gap in coverage likely would have resulted in a temporary 
reduction in access to credit for some consumers because creditors 
would have been concerned that loans for which they receive an 
application within a few months of the effective date of final 
amendments to the General QM loan definition may close after that 
effective date and would

[[Page 67952]]

not be eligible for either the Temporary GSE QM loan definition or the 
revised General QM loan definition. The Bureau did not intend that 
result when it issued the proposed rule.
    In this final rule, the Bureau addresses this concern by providing 
that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition will be available only for 
covered transactions ``for which the creditor receives the consumer's 
application before'' the mandatory compliance date of final amendments 
to the General QM loan definition (rather than covered transactions 
``consummated on or before'' the effective date of final amendments to 
the General QM loan definition, as the Bureau proposed). This approach 
harmonizes with the proposed effective date in the General QM Proposal, 
under which the revised General QM loan definition would apply to 
covered transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's 
application on or after the effective date of a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition. The Bureau concludes that aligning the 
sunset date with the proposed effective date of final amendments to the 
General QM loan definition based on the date the creditor received the 
consumer's application would address the Bureau's access-to-credit 
concern by preventing a gap between the two definitions.
    For the reasons described above, the Bureau is not addressing the 
gap by extending the Temporary GSE QM loan definition beyond the date 
creditors are required to transition from the current General QM loan 
definition to the revised General QM loan definition, as some 
commenters suggested. The Bureau is also not addressing this gap by 
aligning the sunset date with the General QM Proposal based on the date 
of consummation of mortgages. The Bureau is concerned about this 
approach because, as this effective date draws closer, this approach 
would create uncertainty for creditors about which QM definition (i.e., 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition or the revised General QM loan 
definition) would apply to a particular loan, given that creditors 
would not know for certain when consummation would occur.
    To address concerns raised by commenters that the meaning of 
``application'' may be unclear if the Bureau aligned the sunset date 
with the effective date of final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition based on the date the creditor received the consumer's 
application, this final rule adds new comment 43(e)(4)-4. This new 
comment clarifies the meaning of application for purposes of Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B).\138\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \138\ This final rule also renumbers previous comments 43(e)(4)-
4 and -5 as 43(e)(4)-5 and -6, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Regulation Z contains two definitions of ``application.'' Section 
1026.2(a)(3)(i) defines ``application'' as the submission of a 
consumer's financial information for the purposes of obtaining an 
extension of credit. This definition applies to all transactions 
covered by Regulation Z. Section 1026.2(a)(3)(ii) also contains a more 
specific definition of ``application.'' Under this definition, for 
transactions subject to Sec.  1026.19(e), (f), or (g)--i.e., 
transactions subject to TRID--an application consists of the submission 
of the consumer's name, the consumer's income, the consumer's social 
security number to obtain a credit report, the property address, an 
estimate of the value of the property, and the mortgage loan amount 
sought. The more specific definition of application in Sec.  
1026.2(a)(3)(ii) applies not just for purposes of TRID, but extends to 
all transactions subject to TRID. Therefore, for transactions that are 
subject to the ATR/QM Rule and that are also subject to TRID, the 
Bureau concludes that the more specific definition applies for purposes 
of the ATR/QM Rule as well. However, for transactions that are subject 
to the ATR/QM Rule but that are not subject to TRID,\139\ the Bureau 
finds that there may be ambiguity as to when the creditor received the 
consumer's application for purposes of the sunset date in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B). This potential ambiguity arises because the 
general definition of application in Sec.  1026.2(a)(3)(i) is less 
precise than the TRID definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \139\ The ATR/QM Rule generally applies to closed-end consumer 
credit transactions that are secured by a dwelling, as defined in 12 
CFR 1026.2(a)(19), including any real property attached to a 
dwelling. 12 CFR 1026.43(a). Therefore, the ATR/QM Rule applies to a 
dwelling, as defined in Sec.  1026.19(a), whether or not it is 
attached to real property. In contrast, TRID generally applies to 
closed-end consumer credit transactions secured by real property or 
a cooperative unit. 12 CFR 1026.19(e)(1)(i). Therefore, some 
transactions that are a secured by a dwelling that is not considered 
real property under State or other applicable law will be subject to 
the ATR/QM Rule but not to TRID.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To address this potential ambiguity, new comment 43(e)(4)-4 
clarifies that, for transactions that are not subject to TRID, 
creditors can determine the date the creditor received the consumer's 
application for purposes of Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) in accordance 
with either Sec.  1026.2(a)(3)(i) or (ii). The Bureau concludes that 
this clarification is appropriate because it will facilitate compliance 
with Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B).
    The Bureau disagrees with the industry commenter's assertion that 
it would be problematic to align the sunset date with the proposed 
effective date in the General QM Proposal based on the date the 
creditor received the consumer's application. As noted, that commenter 
asserted that because creditors do not determine QM status at the time 
of application, defining a loan as a Temporary GSE QM at the time of 
application may create problems if the loan is later changed and, as a 
result, is no longer eligible for sale at the time of consummation. 
However, under the Bureau's approach, loans would not be defined as QMs 
at the time of application. Rather, the application date would 
determine whether the loan is eligible for the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition or whether it is eligible for the revised General QM loan 
definition.
    Other comments on the sunset date. As noted above, the Bureau 
declines to extend the Temporary GSE QM loan definition beyond the 
mandatory compliance date of final amendments to the General QM loan 
definition. The Bureau recognizes that creditors will need to update 
their business processes and information technology systems as they 
prepare to comply with the revised General QM loan definition, and that 
an update process often includes making planned system changes, testing 
those changes, and making further revisions. The Bureau also 
acknowledges that secondary market participants will need to adjust to 
the revised definition.
    However, as noted above, the Bureau plans, in a final rule amending 
the General QM loan definition, to establish an implementation period--
i.e., the time period after such a final rule is issued and before 
creditors are required to transition from the current General QM loan 
definition to the revised General QM loan definition--that provides the 
amount of time necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition 
to a revised General QM loan definition, after considering the comments 
in that rulemaking. Thus, establishing an overlap period beyond this 
implementation period would keep the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
in place longer than necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly 
transition to a revised General QM loan definition. The Bureau seeks to 
maintain the Temporary GSE QM loan definition only as long as necessary 
to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition to a revised General QM 
loan definition, and no longer, because the Bureau concludes that the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition has certain negative effects on the 
mortgage market, as noted above.

[[Page 67953]]

    In the Bureau's view, commenters have not established why an 
overlap period would be necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly 
transition to a revised General QM loan definition when the Bureau 
establishes a sufficient implementation period for the final rule 
amending that definition. Commenters expressed general concerns that 
unforeseen compliance issues may arise after the implementation period 
ends, but the same is true in adapting to any new rule of this 
magnitude and, as stated above, the Bureau intends to adopt an 
implementation period that gives creditors and the secondary market 
enough time to prepare to comply with the revised definition.\140\ 
Commenters also suggested that an overlap period would reduce the 
potential that a revised General QM loan definition could disrupt the 
mortgage market and affect credit access due to unforeseen changes in 
the economy or the mortgage market due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 
However, based on its analysis of the current state of the mortgage 
market, as described in part II.D above, the Bureau does not believe 
that current conditions in the mortgage market justify a longer 
extension on these grounds, particularly in light of the Bureau's 
concerns about the negative effects of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition on the mortgage market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \140\ As noted above, the Bureau may consider adopting an 
optional early compliance period in a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition. An optional early compliance period 
would allow creditors who are ready to begin using the revised 
General QM loan definition early to do so--and to work out 
unforeseen compliance issues that arise before the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition expires--without the Bureau having to extend the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition beyond the end of the 
implementation period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau also declines to extend the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition indefinitely in this rulemaking and determine its sunset 
date in a final rule amending the General QM loan definition, as the 
two consumer advocate commenters suggest.\141\ The Bureau has not yet 
issued a final rule amending the General QM loan definition, so the 
contours of a revised General QM loan definition are not yet clear. 
However, the Bureau determines that it is nevertheless appropriate for 
this final rule to provide that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
will expire on the mandatory compliance date of a final rule amending 
the General QM loan definition. As noted above in the Bureau's response 
to comments recommending an overlap period, the Bureau plans, in a 
final rule amending the General QM loan definition, to establish an 
implementation period that provides the amount of time necessary to 
facilitate a smooth and orderly transition to a revised General QM loan 
definition. Establishing a sufficient implementation period--based on 
the comments received on the effective date the Bureau proposed in the 
General QM Proposal--will help ensure a smooth transition away from the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition and toward the revised General QM loan 
definition. Second, as noted above in the Bureau's response to the 
comment recommending an overlap period to address the effective date 
gap issue, the Bureau seeks to maintain the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition only as long as necessary to facilitate a smooth and orderly 
transition to a revised General QM loan definition, and no longer, 
because the Bureau concludes that the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
has certain negative effects on the mortgage market. Third, if market 
conditions change or other circumstances arise between now and the time 
the Bureau issues a final rule amending the General QM loan definition, 
the Bureau could choose to extend the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
for a longer period of time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \141\ No commenter recommended that the Bureau extend the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition indefinitely without stating that 
the Bureau should determine the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's 
sunset date in a final rule amending the General QM loan definition. 
The Bureau declines to do so for the reasons stated in the Extension 
Proposal. See 85 FR 41448, 41457 (July 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau also declines to extend the sunset date in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B) to a date certain, as some commenters suggested. 
The Bureau is not extending the sunset date to a date certain because 
the chosen date could result in too long or too short an extension. The 
Bureau is concerned that too short an extension may not provide the 
Bureau with adequate time to finalize amendments to the General QM loan 
definition and creditors with enough time to bring their operations 
into compliance with any amendments adopted by the Bureau. At the same 
time, the Bureau is concerned that too long an extension would have the 
same type of negative effects as the Bureau describes above regarding 
making the Temporary GSE QM loan definition permanent, without any 
offsetting benefits because a longer extension is not needed to provide 
the Bureau with adequate time to consider, propose, and promulgate 
amendments to the General QM loan definition or industry to implement 
those amendments.
    Conservatorship clause. The Bureau also declines to eliminate the 
conservatorship clause in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A). When the Bureau 
adopted the January 2013 Final Rule, the FHFA's conservatorship of the 
GSEs was central to its willingness to presume that loans that are 
eligible for purchase, guarantee, or insurance by the GSEs would be 
originated with appropriate consideration of consumers' ability to 
repay.\142\ The Bureau declines to eliminate the conservatorship clause 
because the Bureau is concerned about presuming that loans eligible for 
purchase or guarantee by either of the GSEs have been originated with 
appropriate consideration of the consumer's ability to repay, if the 
GSEs are not under conservatorship. Furthermore, as the Bureau stated 
in the Extension Proposal, the Bureau expects that the conservatorships 
will remain in place until the Temporary GSE QM loan definition would 
expire under this final rule. As the Bureau stated in the Extension 
Proposal, in the event that it appears that a final rule amending the 
General QM loan definition will not be in effect at the time the 
conservatorship of one or both of the GSEs is terminated, the Bureau 
will evaluate at that point what, if any, steps to take in response to 
such a termination of conservatorship.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \142\ 78 FR 6408, 6534 (Jan. 13, 2013) (``In light of this 
significant Federal role and the government's focus on affordability 
in the wake of the mortgage crisis, the Bureau believes it is 
appropriate, for the time being, to presume that loans that are 
eligible for purchase, guarantee, or insurance by the designated 
Federal agencies and the GSEs while under conservatorship have been 
originated with appropriate consideration of consumers' ability to 
repay, where those loans also satisfy the requirements of Sec.  
1026.43(e)(2) concerning restrictions on product features and total 
points and fees limitations.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As with the January 2013 Final Rule, the Bureau issues this final 
rule pursuant to its authority under TILA sections 129C(b)(3)(B)(i) and 
105(a) and Dodd-Frank Act section 1022(b)(1). For the reasons described 
above in part V.D, the Bureau determines that this final rule's 
extension of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's sunset date is 
necessary and proper to ensure that responsible, affordable mortgage 
credit remains available to consumers in a manner consistent with the 
purposes of TILA section 129C, as well as necessary and appropriate to 
effectuate the purposes of TILA section 129C--including the purpose of 
assuring that consumers are offered and receive residential mortgage 
loans on terms that reasonably reflect their ability to repay the loans 
and that are understandable and not unfair, deceptive, or abusive. For 
these same reasons, the Bureau determines that the extension is 
necessary to effectuate the purposes of

[[Page 67954]]

TILA, which include, among other things, the above-described purpose of 
TILA section 129C.

VII. Dodd-Frank Act Section 1022(b) Analysis

A. Overview

    As discussed above, this final rule will delay the scheduled 
expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition from January 10, 
2021 to the mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued by the 
Bureau amending the General QM loan definition. The Bureau's objective 
with this final rule is to facilitate a smooth and orderly transition 
away from the Temporary GSE QM loan definition and to ensure access to 
responsible, affordable mortgage credit upon its expiration.
    In developing this final rule, the Bureau has considered the 
potential benefits, costs, and impacts as required by section 
1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Specifically, section 
1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act calls for the Bureau to consider 
the potential benefits and costs of a regulation to consumers and 
covered persons, including the potential reduction of access by 
consumers to consumer financial products or services, the impact on 
depository institutions and credit unions with $10 billion or less in 
total assets as described in section 1026 of the Dodd-Frank Act, and 
the impact on consumers in rural areas. The Bureau consulted with 
appropriate Federal agencies regarding the consistency of the proposed 
rule with prudential, market, or systemic objectives administered by 
such agencies as required by section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank 
Act.
1. Data and Evidence
    The discussion in these impact analyses relies on data from a range 
of sources. These include data collected or developed by the Bureau, 
including HMDA \143\ and NMDB \144\ data, as well as data obtained from 
industry, other regulatory agencies, and other publicly available 
sources. The Bureau also conducted the assessment and issued the 
Assessment Report as required under section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank 
Act. The Assessment Report provides quantitative and qualitative 
information on questions relevant to this final rule, including the 
extent to which DTI ratios are probative of a consumer's ability to 
repay, the effect of rebuttable-presumption status relative to safe-
harbor status on access to credit, and the effect of QM status relative 
to non-QM status on access to credit. Consultations with other 
regulatory agencies, industry, and research organizations inform the 
Bureau's impact analyses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \143\ HMDA requires many financial institutions to maintain, 
report, and publicly disclose loan-level information about 
mortgages. These data help show whether creditors are serving the 
housing needs of their communities; they give public officials 
information that helps them make decisions and policies; and they 
shed light on lending patterns that could be discriminatory. HMDA 
was originally enacted by Congress in 1975 and is implemented by 
Regulation C. See Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Mortgage Data 
(HMDA), https://www.consumerfinance.gov/data-research/hmda/.
    \144\ The NMDB, jointly developed by the FHFA and the Bureau, 
provides de-identified loan characteristics and performance 
information for a 5 percent sample of all mortgage originations from 
1998 to the present, supplemented by de-identified loan and borrower 
characteristics from Federal administrative sources and credit 
reporting data. See Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot., Sources and Uses 
of Data at the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, at 55-56 
(Sept. 2018), https://www.consumerfinance.gov/documents/6850/bcfp_sources-uses-of-data.pdf. Differences in total market size 
estimates between NMDB data and HMDA data are attributable to 
differences in coverage and data construction methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The data the Bureau relied upon provide detailed information on the 
number, characteristics, and performance of mortgage loans originated 
in recent years. However, they do not provide information on creditor 
costs. As a result, analyses of any impacts of the Extension Proposal 
on creditor costs, particularly realized costs of complying with 
underwriting criteria or potential costs from legal liability are based 
on more qualitative information. Similarly, estimates of any changes in 
burden on consumers resulting from increased or decreased documentation 
requirements are based on qualitative information.
    In the Extension Proposal, the Bureau set forth a preliminary 
analysis of these effects and requested comments and submissions of 
additional data that could inform the Bureau's analysis of the 
benefits, costs, and impacts of the proposal. The Bureau received 
several comments on its analysis. Several commenters agreed with the 
Bureau's estimates of the baseline effects of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition's expiration, and the potential benefits to covered persons 
and consumers under the Extension Proposal. Two consumer advocate 
commenters that submitted a joint comment letter argued for a more 
complete analysis of alternatives, including an indefinite delay of the 
scheduled expiration of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition as well as 
a comparison of shorter or longer delays of the expiration.
    The Bureau notes that the potential benefits and costs to covered 
persons and consumers discussed in the Extension Proposal were 
estimated for the duration of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition, and 
thus encompass the possibilities of shorter, longer, or indefinite 
delays of expiration. In addition, these commenters argued that because 
the mortgage finance market is in flux, the Bureau should redo its 
analysis of benefits and costs when more data are available. In the 
Extension Proposal, the Bureau acknowledged the important economic 
disruptions and mortgage market changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 
However, the Bureau did not receive new data from commenters to inform 
its analysis and it does not anticipate that market changes or other 
circumstances will significantly alter its estimates of the benefits 
and costs of this final rule. These commenters also stated that the 
Bureau must fulfill its statutory obligation ``to study ability-to-
repay'' before amending the ATR/QM Rule. However, the Bureau has 
already done so by completing the Assessment Report and through its 
monitoring of the performance of mortgage loans and the availability of 
mortgage credit.
2. Description of the Baseline
    The Bureau considers the benefits, costs, and impacts of this final 
rule against the baseline in which the Bureau takes no action and the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires on January 10, 2021, or when 
the GSEs exit conservatorship, whichever occurs first. Under this final 
rule, the Temporary GSE QM loan definition will expire when the GSEs 
exit conservatorship or on the mandatory compliance date of a final 
rule issued by the Bureau amending the General QM loan definition, 
whichever occurs first. As a result, this final rule's direct market 
impacts will occur only if the GSEs remain in conservatorship beyond 
January 10, 2021. The impact analyses assume the GSEs will remain in 
conservatorship for the relevant period of time. Unless described 
otherwise, estimates of loan counts under the baseline and estimates of 
the benefits and costs of this final rule relative to the baseline are 
annual estimates for the duration of the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition.
    Under the baseline, when the Temporary GSE QM loan definition 
expires, conventional loans could only receive QM status under the 
Bureau's rules by underwriting according to the General QM 
requirements, Small Creditor QM requirements, Balloon Payment QM 
requirements, or the expanded portfolio QM amendments created by the 
EGRRCPA. The General QM loan definition, which would be the

[[Page 67955]]

only type of QM available to larger creditors following the expiration 
of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition, requires that consumers' DTI 
ratio not exceed 43 percent and requires creditors to determine debt 
and income in accordance with the standards in appendix Q of Regulation 
Z.
    As stated above in part V.C, the Bureau anticipates that, under the 
baseline in which the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires, there 
are two main types of conventional loans that would be affected: High-
DTI GSE loans (those with DTI ratios above 43 percent) and GSE-eligible 
loans without appendix Q-required documentation. Leaving the current 
fixed sunset date in place would affect these loans because they are 
currently originated as QM loans due to the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition but would not be originated as General QM loans, and may not 
be originated at all, if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to 
expire before amendments to the General QM loan definition are in 
effect. This section 1022 analysis refers to these loans as potentially 
displaced loans.
    The Extension Proposal's analysis of the potential market impact of 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration cited data and 
analysis from the Bureau's ANPR, as described below. None of the 
comments on the Extension Proposal challenged the data or analysis from 
the ANPR or the Extension Proposal related to the potential market 
impacts of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration.\145\ The 
Bureau concludes that the data and analysis in the Extension Proposal 
and ANPR provide an appropriate estimate of the potential impact of the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration for this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \145\ As noted above in part VII.A.1, two consumer advocate 
commenters that submitted a joint comment letter argued for a more 
complete analysis of reasonable alternatives and that the Bureau 
should redo its analysis of benefits and costs when more data is 
available. However, these commenters did not challenge the Bureau's 
estimates of the potential market impacts of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition's expiration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    High-DTI GSE Loans. The ANPR provided an estimate of the number of 
loans potentially affected by the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition.\146\ In providing the estimate, the ANPR focused on 
loans that fall within the Temporary GSE QM loan definition but not the 
General QM loan definition because they have a DTI ratio above 43 
percent. This final rule refers to these loans as High-DTI GSE loans. 
Based on NMDB data, the Bureau estimated that there were approximately 
6.01 million closed-end first-lien residential mortgage originations in 
the United States in 2018.\147\ Based on supplemental data provided by 
FHFA, the Bureau estimated that the GSEs purchased or guaranteed 52 
percent--roughly 3.12 million--of those loans.\148\ Of those 3.12 
million loans, the Bureau estimated that 31 percent--approximately 
957,000 loans--had DTI ratios greater than 43 percent.\149\ Thus, the 
Bureau estimated that as a result of the General QM loan definition's 
43 percent DTI limit, approximately 957,000 loans--16 percent of all 
closed-end first-lien residential mortgage originations in 2018--were 
High-DTI GSE loans.\150\ This estimate does not include Temporary GSE 
QM loans that were eligible for purchase by the GSEs but were not sold 
to the GSEs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \146\ 84 FR 37155, 37158-59 (July 31, 2019).
    \147\ Id.
    \148\ Id. at 37159.
    \149\ Id. The Bureau estimates that 616,000 of these loans were 
for home purchases, and 341,000 were refinance loans. In addition, 
the Bureau estimates that the share of these loans with DTI ratios 
over 45 percent has varied over time due to changes in market 
conditions and GSE underwriting standards, rising from 47 percent in 
2016 to 56 percent in 2017, and further to 69 percent in 2018.
    \150\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Loans Without Appendix Q-Required Documentation That Are Otherwise 
GSE-Eligible. In addition to High-DTI GSE loans, the Bureau noted that 
an additional, smaller number of Temporary GSE QM loans with DTI ratios 
of 43 percent or less when calculated using GSE underwriting guidelines 
would not fall within the General QM loan definition because their 
method of documenting and verifying income or debt is incompatible with 
appendix Q.\151\ These loans would also likely be affected if the 
Temporary GSE QM loan definition were to expire before amendments to 
the General QM loan definition are in effect. As explained in the 
Extension Proposal, the Bureau understands, from extensive public 
feedback and its own experience, that appendix Q does not specifically 
address whether and how to document and include certain forms of 
income. The Bureau understands these concerns are particularly acute 
for self-employed consumers, consumers with part-time employment, and 
consumers with irregular or unusual income streams.\152\ As a result, 
these consumers' access to credit may be affected if the Temporary GSE 
QM loan definition were to expire before amendments to the General QM 
loan definition are in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \151\ Id. at 37159 n.58. Where these types of loans have DTI 
ratios above 43 percent, they would be captured in the estimate 
above relating to High-DTI GSE loans.
    \152\ For example, in qualitative responses to the Bureau's 
Lender Survey conducted as part of the Assessment Report, 
underwriting for self-employed consumers was one of the most 
frequently reported sources of difficulty in originating mortgages 
using appendix Q. These concerns were also raised in comments 
submitted in response to the Assessment RFI, noting that appendix Q 
is ambiguous with respect to how to treat income for consumers who 
are self-employed, have irregular income, or want to use asset 
depletion as income. See Assessment Report, supra note 27, at 200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau's analysis of the market under the baseline focuses on 
High-DTI GSE loans because the Bureau estimates that most potentially 
displaced loans are High-DTI GSE loans. The Bureau also lacks the loan-
level documentation and underwriting data necessary to estimate with 
precision the number of potentially displaced loans that do not fall 
within the other General QM loan requirements and are not High-DTI GSE 
loans. However, the Assessment Report did not find evidence of 
substantial numbers of loans in the non-GSE-eligible jumbo market being 
displaced when appendix Q documentation requirements became effective 
in 2014.\153\ Further, the Assessment Report found evidence of only a 
limited reduction in the approval rate of self-employed applicants for 
non-GSE eligible mortgages.\154\ Based on this evidence, along with 
qualitative comparisons of GSE and appendix Q documentation 
requirements and available data on the prevalence of borrowers with 
non-traditional or difficult-to-document income (e.g., self-employed 
borrowers, retired borrowers, those with irregular income streams), the 
Bureau estimates this second category of potentially displaced loans is 
considerably less numerous than the category of High-DTI GSE loans. 
Nevertheless, the Bureau believes that, for some borrowers, there would 
be a meaningful impact on their access to credit because their method 
of documenting and verifying income or debt is incompatible with 
appendix Q.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \153\ Id. at 107 (``For context, total jumbo purchase 
originations increased from an estimated 108,700 to 130,200 between 
2013 and 2014, based on nationally representative NMDB data.'').
    \154\ Id. at 118 (``The Application Data indicates that, 
notwithstanding concerns that have been expressed about the 
challenge of documenting and verifying income for self-employed 
borrowers under the General QM standard and the documentation 
requirements contained in appendix Q to the Rule, approval rates for 
non-High DTI, non-GSE eligible self-employed borrowers have 
decreased only slightly, by two percentage points.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional Effects on Loans Not Displaced. The Extension Proposal 
explained that, while the most significant market effects under the 
baseline are displaced loans, loans that continue to be originated as 
QM loans after the expiration of the Temporary

[[Page 67956]]

GSE QM loan definition would also be affected. After the sunset date, 
absent changes to the General QM loan definition, all loans with DTI 
ratios at or below 43 percent that are or would have been purchased and 
guaranteed as GSE loans under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition--
approximately 2.16 million loans in 2018--and that continue to be 
originated as General QM loans after the provision expires would be 
required to verify income and debts according to appendix Q, rather 
than only according to GSE guidelines. Given the concerns raised about 
appendix Q's ambiguity and lack of flexibility, this would likely 
entail both increased documentation burden for some consumers as well 
as increased costs or time-to-origination for creditors on some 
loans.\155\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \155\ See part V.B for additional discussion of concerns raised 
about appendix Q.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Benefits and Costs to Covered Persons and Consumers

1. Benefits to Consumers
    The primary benefit to consumers of this final rule is the 
continued availability of High-DTI GSE loans during the period of the 
extension. Given the large number of consumers who obtain such loans 
rather than available alternatives, including loans from the private 
non-GSE market and FHA loans, these GSE loans may be preferred due to 
their pricing, underwriting requirements, or other features.
    Under the baseline, a sizeable share of potentially displaced High-
DTI GSE loans may instead be originated as FHA loans. Thus, under this 
final rule, any price advantage of GSE loans over FHA loans will be a 
realized benefit to consumers. Based on the Bureau's analysis of 2018 
HMDA data, FHA loans comparable to the loans received by High-DTI GSE 
borrowers, based on loan purpose, credit score, and combined LTV ratio, 
on average have $3,000 to $5,000 higher upfront total loan costs. APRs 
provide an alternative, annualized measure of costs over the life of a 
loan. FHA borrowers typically pay different APRs, which can be higher 
or lower than APRs for GSE loans depending on a borrower's credit score 
and LTV. Borrowers with credit scores at or above 720 pay an APR 30 to 
60 basis points higher than borrowers of comparable GSE loans, leading 
to higher monthly payments over the life of the loan. However, FHA 
borrowers with credit scores below 680 and combined LTVs exceeding 85 
percent pay an APR 20 to 40 basis points lower than borrowers of 
comparable GSE loans, leading to lower monthly payments over the life 
of the loan.\156\ For a loan size of $250,000, these APR differences 
amount to $2,800 to $5,600 in additional total monthly payments over 
the first five years of mortgage payments for borrowers with credit 
scores above 720, and $1,900 to $3,800 in reduced total monthly 
payments over five years for borrowers with credit scores below 680 and 
LTVs exceeding 85 percent.\157\ Thus all FHA borrowers are likely to 
pay higher costs at origination, while some pay higher monthly mortgage 
payments, and others pay lower monthly mortgage payments. Assuming, for 
comparison, that all 957,000 High-DTI GSE loans would be made as FHA 
loans in the absence of this final rule, the average of the upfront 
pricing estimates implies total savings for consumers of roughly $4 
billion per year on upfront costs while the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition remains in effect.\158\ While this comparison assumed all 
potentially displaced loans would be made as FHA loans, higher costs 
(either upfront or in monthly payments) are likely to prevent some 
borrowers from obtaining loans at all.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \156\ The Bureau expects consumers could continue to obtain FHA 
loans where such loans were cheaper or preferred for other reasons.
    \157\ Based on NMDB data, the Bureau estimates that the average 
loan amount among High-DTI GSE borrowers in 2018 was $250,000. While 
the time to repayment for mortgages varies with economic conditions, 
the Bureau estimates that half of mortgages are typically closed or 
paid off five to seven years into repayment. Payment comparisons 
based on typical 2018 HMDA APRs for GSE loans, 5 percent for 
borrowers with credit scores over 720, and 6 percent for borrowers 
with credit scores below 680 and LTVs exceeding 85 percent.
    \158\ This approximation assumes $4,000 in savings from total 
loan costs for all 957,000 consumers. Actual expected savings would 
vary substantially based on loan and credit characteristics, 
consumer choices, and market conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the absence of this final rule, some of these potentially 
displaced consumers, particularly those with higher credit scores and 
the resources to make larger down payments, likely would be able to 
obtain credit in the non-GSE private market at a cost comparable or 
slightly higher than the costs for GSE loans, but below the cost of an 
FHA loan. As a result, the above cost comparisons between GSE and FHA 
loans provide an estimated upper bound on pricing benefits to consumers 
of this final rule. However, under the baseline, some potentially 
displaced consumers may not obtain loans and thus will experience 
benefits of credit access under this final rule.\159\ As discussed 
above, the Assessment Report found that the January 2013 Final Rule 
eliminated between 63 and 70 percent of high-DTI home purchase loans 
that were not Temporary GSE QM loans.\160\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \159\ In particular, the Assessment Report concluded that some 
borrowers with strong credit characteristics may no longer be able 
to obtain conventional QM loans, despite likely possessing the 
ability to repay such loans. Assessment Report, supra note 27, at 
150 (``Together, these findings suggest that the observed decrease 
in access to credit in this segment was likely driven by lenders' 
desire to avoid the risk of litigation by consumers asserting a 
violation of the ATR requirement or other risks associated with that 
requirement, rather than by rejections of borrowers who were 
unlikely to repay the loan.'').
    \160\ See id. at 10-11, 117, 131-47.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This final rule will also benefit those consumers with incomes 
difficult to document using appendix Q to obtain General QM status, as 
the Temporary GSE QM loan definition continues to allow documentation 
of income and debt through GSE standards. The greater flexibility of 
GSE documentation standards likely reduces effort and costs for these 
consumers under this final rule, and in the most difficult cases in 
which borrowers' documentation cannot satisfy appendix Q, this final 
rule will allow consumers to receive Temporary GSE QM loans rather than 
potential FHA or non-QM alternatives. These consumers will likely 
benefit from cost savings under this final rule, similar to those for 
High-DTI consumers discussed above.
2. Benefits to Covered Persons
    This final rule's primary benefit to covered persons, specifically 
mortgage creditors, is the continued profits from originating High-DTI 
conventional QM loans. Under the baseline, creditors would be unable to 
originate such loans under the Temporary GSE QM loan definition after 
January 10, 2021 and would instead have to originate loans with 
comparable DTI ratios as FHA, Small Creditor QM, or non-QM loans, or 
originate at lower DTI ratios as conventional General QM loans. 
Creditors' current preference for originating large numbers of High-DTI 
Temporary GSE QM loans likely reflects advantages in a combination of 
costs or guarantee fees (particularly relative to FHA loans), liquidity 
(particularly relative to Small Creditor QM), or litigation and credit 
risk (particularly relative to non-QM). Moreover, QM loans--including 
Temporary GSE QM loans--are exempt from the Dodd-Frank Act risk 
retention requirement whereby creditors that securitize mortgage loans 
are required to retain at least 5 percent of the credit risk of the 
security, which adds significant cost. As a result, this final rule 
conveys benefits to mortgage creditors originating Temporary GSE QM 
loans on each of these dimensions.

[[Page 67957]]

    In addition, for those lower-DTI GSE loans which could satisfy 
General QM requirements, creditors may realize cost savings from 
continuing to underwrite loans using only the more flexible GSE 
documentation standards as compared to the appendix Q underwriting 
standards required for General QM loans. For GSE consumers unable to 
provide documentation compatible with appendix Q, this final rule 
allows such loans to continue receiving QM status, providing comparable 
benefits to creditors as described for High-DTI GSE loans above.
    Finally, those creditors whose business models rely most heavily on 
originating High-DTI GSE loans will likely see a competitive benefit 
from the continued ability to originate such loans as Temporary GSE QM 
loans. This is effectively a transfer in market share to these 
creditors from those who primarily originate FHA or private non-GSE 
loans, who likely would have gained market share after the expiration 
of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition.
3. Costs to Consumers
    The extension of the Temporary GSE QM loan definition could delay 
the development of the non-QM market, particularly new mortgage 
products which may have become available if the Temporary GSE QM loan 
definition had been allowed to expire. To the extent that some 
consumers would prefer some of these products to GSE loans due to 
pricing, documentation flexibility, or other advantages, the delay of 
their development will be a cost to consumers of this final rule.
    In addition, consumers who would have obtained non-QM loans under 
the baseline but instead obtain QM loans under this final rule forgo 
the benefit of retaining the ATR causes of action and defenses against 
foreclosure.
4. Costs to Covered Persons
    This final rule's most sizable costs to covered persons are 
effectively transfers between lenders for the duration of the 
extension, reflecting reduced loan origination volume for lenders who 
primarily originate FHA or private non-GSE loans and increased 
origination volume for lenders who primarily originate GSE loans. 
Business models vary substantially within market segments, with 
portfolio lenders and lenders originating non-QM loans most likely to 
experience a delay in market share gains that would have been possible 
if the Temporary GSE QM loan definition had been allowed to expire, 
while GSE-focused bank and non-bank lenders are likely to maintain 
market share that might be lost sooner in the absence of this final 
rule.
5. Other Benefits and Costs
    In delaying the Temporary GSE QM loan definition's expiration, this 
final rule will delay any effects of the expiration on the development 
of the secondary market for private (non-GSE) mortgage loan securities. 
When the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires, those loans that do 
not fit within the General QM loan definition represent a potential new 
market for private securitizations. Thus, this final rule will reduce 
the scope of the potential non-QM market for the duration of the 
extension, likely lowering profits and revenues for participants in the 
private secondary market. This will effectively be a transfer from 
these private secondary market participants to participants in the 
agency secondary market.
Impact on Depository Institutions and Credit Unions With $10 Billion or 
Less in Total Assets, as Described in Section 1026
    This final rule's expected impact on depository institutions and 
credit unions that are also creditors making covered loans (depository 
creditors) with $10 billion or less in total assets is similar to the 
expected impact on larger creditors and on non-depository creditors. As 
discussed in part VII.B.4 (Costs to Covered Persons), depository 
creditors originating portfolio loans may experience a delay in 
potential market share gains that would occur in the absence of this 
final rule. In addition, those smaller creditors originating portfolio 
loans can originate High-DTI Small Creditor QM loans under the rule, 
and thus may rely less on the Temporary GSE QM loan definition for 
originating High-DTI loans. If the expiration of the Temporary GSE QM 
loan definition would confer a competitive advantage to these small 
creditors in their origination of High-DTI loans, this final rule will 
delay this outcome.
    Conversely, those small creditors that primarily rely on the GSEs 
as a secondary market outlet because they do not have the capacity to 
hold numerous loans in portfolio or the infrastructure or scale to 
securitize loans may continue to benefit from the ability to make High-
DTI GSE loans as Temporary GSE QM loans. In the absence of this final 
rule, these creditors would be limited to originating GSE loans as QMs 
only with DTI at or below 43 percent under the General QM loan 
definition. These creditors may also originate FHA, VA, or USDA loans 
or non-QM loans for private securitizations, likely at a higher cost 
relative to Temporary GSE QM loans.
Impact on Rural Areas
    This final rule's expected impact on rural areas is similar to the 
expected impact on non-rural areas. Based on 2018 HMDA data, the Bureau 
estimates that High-DTI conventional purchase mortgages are comparably 
likely to be reported as initially sold to the GSEs in rural areas 
(52.5 percent) as in non-rural areas (52.0 percent).\161\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \161\ These statistics are estimated based on originations from 
the first nine months of the year, to allow time for loans to be 
sold before HMDA reporting deadlines. In addition, a higher share of 
High-DTI conventional purchase non-rural loans (33.3 percent) report 
being sold to other non-GSE purchasers compared to rural loans (22.3 
percent).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VIII. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as amended by the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, requires each 
agency to consider the potential impact of its regulations on small 
entities, including small businesses, small governmental units, and 
small not-for-profit organizations.\162\ The RFA defines a ``small 
business'' as a business that meets the size standard developed by the 
Small Business Administration pursuant to the Small Business Act.\163\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \162\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \163\ 5 U.S.C. 601(3) (the Bureau may establish an alternative 
definition after consultation with the Small Business Administration 
and an opportunity for public comment).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The RFA generally requires an agency to conduct an initial 
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a final regulatory 
flexibility analysis (FRFA) of any rule subject to notice-and-comment 
rulemaking requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.\164\ The Bureau also is subject to certain additional 
procedures under the RFA involving the convening of a panel to consult 
with small business representatives prior to proposing a rule for which 
an IRFA is required.\165\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \164\ 5 U.S.C. 603 through 605.
    \165\ 5 U.S.C. 609.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Extension Proposal, the Bureau certified that an IRFA was 
not required because the proposal, if adopted, would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The Bureau did not receive comments on its analysis of the impact of 
the Extension Proposal on small entities. The Bureau does not expect 
this final rule to impose costs on small entities relative to the 
baseline. Under

[[Page 67958]]

the baseline, the Temporary GSE QM loan definition expires, and 
therefore no creditor--including small entities--would be able to 
originate QM loans under that definition. Under this final rule, 
certain small entities that would otherwise not be able to originate QM 
loans under that definition will be able to originate such loans with 
QM status. Thus, the Bureau anticipates that this final rule will only 
reduce the burden on small entities relative to the baseline.
    Accordingly, the Director certifies that this final rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Thus, a FRFA is not required for this final rule.

IX. Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),\166\ Federal 
agencies are generally required to seek, prior to implementation, 
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for information 
collection requirements. Under the PRA, the Bureau may not conduct or 
sponsor, and, notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person is 
not required to respond to, an information collection unless the 
information collection displays a valid control number assigned by OMB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \166\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau has determined that this final rule does not contain any 
new or substantively revised information collection requirements other 
than those previously approved by OMB under that OMB control number 
3170-0015. This final rule will amend 12 CFR part 1026 (Regulation Z), 
which implements TILA. OMB control number 3170-0015 is the Bureau's OMB 
control number for Regulation Z.

X. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,\167\ the Bureau will 
submit a report containing this rule and other required information to 
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller 
General of the United States at least 60 days prior to the rule's 
published effective date. The Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs has designated this rule as a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
U.S.C. 804(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \167\ 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

XI. Signing Authority

    The Director of the Bureau, having reviewed and approved this 
document, is delegating the authority to electronically sign this 
document to Laura Galban, a Bureau Federal Register Liaison, for 
purposes of publication in the Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1026

    Advertising, Banking, Banks, Consumer protection, Credit, Credit 
unions, Mortgages, National banks, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Savings associations, Truth-in-lending.

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons set forth above, the Bureau amends Regulation Z, 12 
CFR part 1026, as set forth below:

PART 1026--TRUTH IN LENDING (REGULATION Z)

0
1. The authority citation for part 1026 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  12 U.S.C. 2601, 2603-2605, 2607, 2609, 2617, 3353, 
5511, 5512, 5532, 5581; 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.

Subpart E--Special Rules for Certain Home Mortgage Transactions

0
2. Amend Sec.  1026.43 by revising paragraph (e)(4)(iii)(B) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  1026.43  Minimum standards for transactions secured by a 
dwelling.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (B) Unless otherwise expired under paragraph (e)(4)(iii)(A) of this 
section, the special rules in this paragraph (e)(4) are available only 
for covered transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's 
application before the mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued 
by the Bureau amending paragraph (e)(2) of this section. The Bureau 
will also amend this paragraph prior to that mandatory compliance date 
to reflect the new status.
* * * * *

0
3. In Supplement I to Part 1026--Official Interpretations, under 
Section 1026.43--Minimum Standards for Transactions Secured by a 
Dwelling, revise 43(e)(4) Qualified mortgage defined--special rules to 
read as follows:

Supplement I to Part 1026--Official Interpretations

* * * * *
    Section 1026.43--Minimum standards for transactions secured by a 
dwelling.
* * * * *
    43(e)(4) Qualified mortgage defined--special rules.
    1. Alternative definition. Subject to the sunset provided under 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii), Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) provides an alternative 
definition of qualified mortgage to the definition provided in Sec.  
1026.43(e)(2). To be a qualified mortgage under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4), 
the transaction must satisfy the requirements under Sec.  
1026.43(e)(2)(i) through (iii), in addition to being one of the types 
of loans specified in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A) through (E).
    2. Termination of conservatorship. Section 1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A) 
requires that a covered transaction be eligible for purchase or 
guarantee by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or 
the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) (or any 
limited-life regulatory entity succeeding the charter of either) 
operating under the conservatorship or receivership of the Federal 
Housing Finance Agency pursuant to section 1367 of the Federal Housing 
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 
4617). The special rule under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A) does not apply 
if Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any limited-life regulatory entity 
succeeding the charter of either) has ceased operating under the 
conservatorship or receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. 
For example, if either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or succeeding 
limited-life regulatory entity) ceases to operate under the 
conservatorship or receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii)(A) would no longer apply to loans eligible for 
purchase or guarantee by that entity; however, the special rule would 
be available for a loan that is eligible for purchase or guarantee by 
the other entity still operating under conservatorship or receivership.
    3. Timing. Under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii), the definition of 
qualified mortgage under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) applies only to loans for 
which the creditor receives the consumer's application before the 
mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued by the Bureau amending 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(2), regardless of whether Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac 
(or any limited-life regulatory entity succeeding the charter of 
either) continues to operate under the conservatorship or receivership 
of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Accordingly, Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) 
is available only for covered transactions:
    i. That are consummated on or before the date Fannie Mae or Freddie 
Mac (or any limited-life regulatory entity succeeding the charter of 
either), respectively, cease to operate under the conservatorship or 
receivership of the Federal Housing Finance Agency pursuant to section 
1367 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety

[[Page 67959]]

and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4617); and
    ii. That are transactions for which the creditor receives the 
consumer's application before the mandatory compliance date of a final 
rule issued by the Bureau amending Sec.  1026.43(e)(2), as provided by 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii). The Bureau will also amend this commentary 
prior to that mandatory compliance date to reflect the new status.
    4. Application. Under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B), the special 
rules in Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)--unless they are otherwise expired under 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(A)--are available only for covered 
transactions for which the creditor receives the consumer's application 
before the mandatory compliance date of a final rule issued by the 
Bureau amending paragraph (e)(2) of this section. Under Sec.  
1026.2(a)(3)(i), application means the submission of a consumer's 
financial information for the purposes of obtaining an extension of 
credit. This definition applies to all transactions covered by 
Regulation Z. Regulation Z also provides a more specific definition for 
transactions subject to Sec.  1026.19(e), (f), or (g). For such 
transactions, an application consists of the submission of the 
consumer's name, the consumer's income, the consumer's social security 
number to obtain a credit report, the property address, an estimate of 
the value of the property, and the mortgage loan amount sought. 
Therefore, for transactions subject to Sec.  1026.19(e), (f), or (g), 
creditors determine the date the creditor received the consumer's 
application, for purposes of Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B), in accordance 
with Sec.  1026.2(a)(3)(ii). For transactions that are not subject to 
Sec.  1026.19(e), (f), or (g), creditors can determine the date the 
creditor received the consumer's application, for purposes of Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(iii)(B), in accordance with either Sec.  1026.2(a)(3)(i) 
or (ii).
    5. Eligible for purchase, guarantee, or insurance except with 
regard to matters wholly unrelated to ability to repay. To satisfy 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4)(ii), a loan need not be actually purchased or 
guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or insured or guaranteed by one 
of the Agencies (the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 
(HUD), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), U.S. Department of 
Agriculture (USDA), or Rural Housing Service (RHS)). Rather, Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4)(ii) requires only that the creditor determine that the 
loan is eligible (i.e., meets the criteria) for such purchase, 
guarantee, or insurance at consummation. For example, for purposes of 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4), a creditor is not required to sell a loan to 
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any limited-life regulatory entity 
succeeding the charter of either) for that loan to be a qualified 
mortgage; however, the loan must be eligible for purchase or guarantee 
by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (or any limited-life regulatory entity 
succeeding the charter of either), including satisfying any 
requirements regarding consideration and verification of a consumer's 
income or assets, credit history, debt-to-income ratio or residual 
income, and other credit risk factors, but not any requirements 
regarding matters wholly unrelated to ability to repay. To determine 
eligibility for purchase, guarantee or insurance, a creditor may rely 
on a valid underwriting recommendation provided by a GSE automated 
underwriting system (AUS) or an AUS that relies on an Agency 
underwriting tool; compliance with the standards in the GSE or Agency 
written guide in effect at the time; a written agreement between the 
creditor or a direct sponsor or aggregator of the creditor and a GSE or 
Agency that permits variation from the standards of the written guides 
and/or variation from the AUSs, in effect at the time of consummation; 
or an individual loan waiver granted by the GSE or Agency to the 
creditor. For creditors relying on the variances of a sponsor or 
aggregator, a loan that is transferred directly to or through the 
sponsor or aggregator at or after consummation complies with Sec.  
1026.43(e)(4). In using any of the four methods listed above, the 
creditor need not satisfy standards that are wholly unrelated to 
assessing a consumer's ability to repay that the creditor is required 
to perform. Matters wholly unrelated to ability to repay are those 
matters that are wholly unrelated to credit risk or the underwriting of 
the loan. Such matters include requirements related to the status of 
the creditor rather than the loan, requirements related to selling, 
securitizing, or delivering the loan, and any requirement that the 
creditor must perform after the consummated loan is sold, guaranteed, 
or endorsed for insurance such as document custody, quality control, or 
servicing.
    Accordingly, a covered transaction is eligible for purchase or 
guarantee by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, for example, if:
    i. The loan conforms to the relevant standards set forth in the 
Fannie Mae Single-Family Selling Guide or the Freddie Mac Single-Family 
Seller/Servicer Guide in effect at the time, or to standards set forth 
in a written agreement between the creditor or a sponsor or aggregator 
of the creditor and Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac in effect at that time 
that permits variation from the standards of those guides;
    ii. The loan has been granted an individual waiver by a GSE, which 
will allow purchase or guarantee in spite of variations from the 
applicable standards; or
    iii. The creditor inputs accurate information into the Fannie Mae 
or Freddie Mac AUS or another AUS pursuant to a written agreement 
between the creditor and Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac that permits 
variation from the GSE AUS; the loan receives one of the 
recommendations specified below in paragraphs A or B from the 
corresponding GSE AUS or an equivalent recommendation pursuant to 
another AUS as authorized in the written agreement; and the creditor 
satisfies any requirements and conditions specified by the relevant AUS 
that are not wholly unrelated to ability to repay, the non-satisfaction 
of which would invalidate that recommendation:
    A. An ``Approve/Eligible'' recommendation from Desktop Underwriter 
(DU); or
    B. A risk class of ``Accept'' and purchase eligibility of ``Freddie 
Mac Eligible'' from Loan Prospector (LP).
    6. Repurchase and indemnification demands. A repurchase or 
indemnification demand by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, VA, USDA, or 
RHS is not dispositive of qualified mortgage status. Qualified mortgage 
status under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) depends on whether a loan is eligible 
to be purchased, guaranteed, or insured at the time of consummation, 
provided that other requirements under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) are 
satisfied. Some repurchase or indemnification demands are not related 
to eligibility criteria at consummation. See comment 43(e)(4)-4. 
Further, even where a repurchase or indemnification demand relates to 
whether the loan satisfied relevant eligibility requirements as of the 
time of consummation, the mere fact that a demand has been made, or 
even resolved, between a creditor and GSE or agency is not dispositive 
for purposes of Sec.  1026.43(e)(4). However, evidence of whether a 
particular loan satisfied the Sec.  1026.43(e)(4) eligibility criteria 
at consummation may be brought to light in the course of dealing over a 
particular demand, depending on the facts and circumstances. 
Accordingly, each loan should be evaluated by the creditor based on the 
facts and circumstances relating to the eligibility of that loan at the 
time of consummation. For example:

[[Page 67960]]

    i. Assume eligibility to purchase a loan was based in part on the 
consumer's employment income of $50,000 per year. The creditor uses the 
income figure in obtaining an approve/eligible recommendation from DU. 
A quality control review, however, later determines that the 
documentation provided and verified by the creditor to comply with 
Fannie Mae requirements did not support the reported income of $50,000 
per year. As a result, Fannie Mae demands that the creditor repurchase 
the loan. Assume that the quality control review is accurate, and that 
DU would not have issued an approve/eligible recommendation if it had 
been provided the accurate income figure. The DU determination at the 
time of consummation was invalid because it was based on inaccurate 
information provided by the creditor; therefore, the loan was never a 
qualified mortgage under Sec.  1026.43(e)(4).
    ii. Assume that a creditor delivered a loan, which the creditor 
determined was a qualified mortgage at the time of consummation under 
Sec.  1026.43(e)(4), to Fannie Mae for inclusion in a particular To-Be-
Announced Mortgage-Backed Security (MBS) pool of loans. The data 
submitted by the creditor at the time of loan delivery indicated that 
the various loan terms met the product type, weighted-average coupon, 
weighted-average maturity, and other MBS pooling criteria, and MBS 
issuance disclosures to investors reflected this loan data. However, 
after delivery and MBS issuance, a quality control review determines 
that the loan violates the pooling criteria. The loan still meets 
eligibility requirements for Fannie Mae products and loan terms. Fannie 
Mae, however, requires the creditor to repurchase the loan due to the 
violation of MBS pooling requirements. Assume that the quality control 
review determination is accurate. Because the loan still meets Fannie 
Mae's eligibility requirements, it remains a qualified mortgage based 
on these facts and circumstances.
* * * * *

    Dated: October 20, 2020.
Laura Galban,
Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2020-23540 Filed 10-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P