[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 26, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52640-52641]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18695]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1133]
Certain Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Components Thereof; Final
Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337 and Issuance of
Remedial Orders; Suspension of Enforcement of the Remedial Orders
Pending Final Resolution of a Final Written Decision by the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board; and Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (the ``Commission'') has determined that: (i) The
respondents have violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, by importing, selling for importation, or selling in the
United States after importation certain unmanned aerial vehicles
(``UAVs'') that infringe complainant's U.S. Patent No. 9,260,184 (``the
'184 patent''); (2) the respondents' redesigned rotor locking
assemblies were not ripe for adjudication in this investigation; (3)
the appropriate remedies are a limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders; and (4) enforcement of said remedial orders will be
suspended pending final resolution of a Final Written Decision by the
Patent and Trademark Office (``PTAB'') that the asserted claims of the
'184 patent are unpatentable. This investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl P. Bretscher, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2382. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket system (``EDIS'') at
https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on October 2, 2018, based on a complaint filed by Autel Robotics USA,
Inc. (``Autel'') of Bothell, Washington. 83 FR 49575-76 (Oct. 2, 2018).
The complaint accuses respondents of violating 19 U.S.C. 1337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``Section 337'') by importing into the
United States, selling for importation, or selling in the United States
after importation certain unmanned aerial vehicles and components
thereof that infringe the asserted claims of the '184 patent as well as
of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,979,174 (``the '174 patent'') and 10,044,013
(``the '013 patent''). Id. The complaint also alleges the existence of
a domestic industry. Id.
The notice of investigation named the following respondents: SZ DJI
Technology Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; DJI Europe B.V. of Barendrecht,
Netherlands; DJI Technology Inc. of Burbank, California; iFlight
Technology Co., Ltd. (``iFlight'') of Hong Kong; DJI Baiwang Technology
Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; DJI Research LLC of Palo Alto, California;
DJI Service LLC (``DJI Service'') of Cerritos, California; and DJI
Creative Studio LLC of Burbank, California (collectively, ``DJI''). Id.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not a party to this
investigation. Id.
On September 13, 2019, the presiding Administrative Law Judge
(``ALJ'') issued Order No. 21, granting in part Autel's motion to
strike evidence and expert opinions relating to DJI's ``new designs''
for rotor and battery locking mechanisms that DJI allegedly disclosed
after the close of discovery. Order No. 21 at 2-4 (Sept. 13, 2019).
On October 17, 2019, the Commission determined not to review Order
No. 22, which partially terminated the investigation with respect to
certain patent claims withdrawn by Autel. Order No. 22 (Sept. 30,
2019), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 17, 2019). The claims that
remained at issue are claims 1, 2, and 5 of the '184 patent; claims 1,
7, 8, 14, and 17 of the '174 patent; and claims 1, 3-5, 8, 10, 13-16,
18, 22, or 23 of the '013 patent.
The ALJ held an evidentiary hearing on October 21-23, 2019. At the
start of that hearing, the ALJ announced that DJI's new designs are not
part of this investigation.
On March 2, 2020, the ALJ issued a combined Initial Determination
on Violation of Section 337 (``ID'') and Recommended Determination
(``RD'') on Remedy and Bonding, finding a violation of Section 337 by
way of infringement of the '184 patent but no violation with respect to
the '174 or '013 patents. On March 9, 2020, the ALJ issued an errata,
which corrects a misstatement in the original ID regarding the '174
patent but does not change the ID's findings on infringement or
violation. See Notice of Errata to Final Initial Determination (Mar. 9,
2020).
On March 16, 2020, the parties filed petitions for review of
certain findings in the final ID, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.43(a)
(19 CFR 210.43(a)). The parties filed their respective responses on
March 24, 2020, pursuant to Commission Rule 210.43(c) (19 CFR
210.43(c)).
On May 15, 2020, the Commission issued a notice soliciting public
comments on the public interest factors, if any, that may be implicated
if a remedy were to be issued in this investigation. 85 FR 30735 (May
20, 2020). The Commission did not receive any comments in response to
its notice.
On May 29, 2020, while the petitions for review were still pending
before the Commission, respondents' counsel filed a letter with the
Commission attaching four recent Final Written Decisions by the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board (``PTAB'') of the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, in which the PTAB found the challenged claims of the '184,
'174, and '013 patents, including the claims asserted in this
investigation, to be unpatentable. See SZ DJI Technology Co. v. Autel
Robotics USA LLC, Case IPR2019-00343, Final Written Decision Finding
All Challenged Claims Unpatentable (PTAB May 21, 2020) (regarding '184
patent); SZ DJI Technology Co. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC, Case IPR2019-
00250, Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims
Unpatentable (PTAB May 13, 2020) (regarding '174 patent); SZ DJI
Technology Co. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC, Case IPR2019-00249, Final
Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable (PTAB May
13, 2020) (regarding '174 patent); SZ DJI Technology Co. v. Autel
Robotics USA LLC, Case IPR2019-00016, Final Written Decision Finding
All Challenged Claims Unpatentable (PTAB May 14, 2020) (regarding '013
patent).
On June 8, 2020, the Commission issued a notice stating that it
determined to partially review the ID with respect to infringement of
the '184 patent, whether DJI's new rotor locking assemblies should be
adjudicated as part of this investigation, and the impact on this
investigation, if any, of the PTAB's Final Written Decision finding the
challenged claims of the '184 patent
[[Page 52641]]
unpatentable. Comm'n Notice at 2-3 (June 9, 2020). The Commission
determined not to review the ID's findings that the asserted claims of
the '184 patent are not invalid, the domestic industry requirement is
satisfied, and there is no violation of Section 337 with respect to
either the '174 or '013 patents. Id. The Commission asked the parties
to brief several questions regarding: (i) The impact, if any, of the
PTAB's Final Written Decision finding that asserted claims of the '184
patent, among others, are unpatentable; (ii) whether DJI's new rotor
locking designs should be adjudicated as part of this investigation;
and (iii) whether DJI's Phantom 4 Pro and Inspire UAVs infringe the
asserted claims of the '184 patent. Id. at 3-4. The Commission also
asked the parties for briefing on remedy, bonding, and the public
interest and extended the target date for completion of this
investigation to August 10, 2020. Id. at 4-5. The target date was
further extended to August 20, 2020. Comm'n Notice (August 10, 2020).
The parties filed their initial responses to the Commission's
review questions on June 24, 2020, and their respective reply briefs on
July 1, 2020.
Having considered the parties' submissions, the ID, and the record
in this investigation, the Commission has determined that DJI has
violated Section 337 by importing into the United States, selling for
importation, or selling in the United States after importation certain
unmanned aerial vehicles and components thereof that infringe claims 1
and 2 of the '184 patent. In particular, the parties did not petition
for review of the ID's findings that DJI's Mavic Pro, Mavic Air, and
Spark UAVs infringe claim 1 of the '184 patent. The Commission has
determined that those UAVs also infringe claim 2 and that DJI's Phantom
4 Pro UAV infringes both claims 1 and 2. The Commission further
determines that DJI's Inspire UAV does not infringe either claim 1 or 2
of the '184 patent. The Commission also affirms the ALJ's decision not
to adjudicate DJI's new rotor locking designs in the present
investigation.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate remedy is: (a) A
limited exclusion order prohibiting the importation of certain unmanned
aerial vehicles and components thereof that are covered by claims 1 or
2 of the '184 patent; and (b) cease and desist orders against
respondents iFlight and DJI Service. The Commission has determined that
the public interest factors enumerated in Section 337(d)(1) and (f)(1)
do not preclude issuance of the limited exclusion order or cease and
desist orders. The Commission has also determined to set a bond in the
amount of 11.5 percent of the entered value of the excluded products
imported during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)).
The Commission has also determined to suspend enforcement of the
limited exclusion order, cease and desist orders, and bond provision
pending final resolution of the PTAB's Final Written Decision regarding
the '184 patent. See 35 U.S.C. 318(b); SZ DJI Technology Co. v. Autel
Robotics USA, LLC, IPR2019-00343, Patent 9,260,184, Final Written
Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable (May 21, 2020).
The Commission's orders and opinion were delivered to the President
and United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The Commission voted to approve these determinations on August 20,
2020. This investigation is hereby terminated.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: August 20, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-18695 Filed 8-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P