[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47170-47174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-910, C-821-827]


Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
From the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation: Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Investigations

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.


DATES: Applicable July 28, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caitlin Monks (the Russian 
Federation), Moses Song, or Natasia Harrison (the Republic of Korea), 
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2670, (202) 482-7885 or 
(202) 482-1240, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petitions

    On July 8, 2020, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) 
received countervailing duty (CVD) petitions (Petitions) concerning 
imports of seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure 
pipe (seamless pipe) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) and the Russian 
Federation (Russia), filed in proper form on behalf of Vallourec Star, 
LP (the petitioner), a domestic producer of seamless pipe.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Seamless Carbon and Alloy 
Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, the 
Republic of Korea, Russia, and Ukraine,'' dated July 8, 2020 (the 
Petitions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Between July 10 and July 20, 2020, Commerce requested supplemental 
information pertaining to certain aspects of the Petitions.\2\ The 
petitioner filed

[[Page 47171]]

responses to these requests between July 14 and July 21, 2020.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of 
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, the 
Republic of Korea, Russia, and Ukraine and Countervailing Duties on 
Imports from the Republic of Korea and Russia: Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated July 13, 2020 (General Issues Questionnaire); see 
also Commerce's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of 
Countervailing Duties on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Russian Federation,'' dated July 
14, 2020; Commerce's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of 
Countervailing Duties on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Supplemental 
Questions,'' dated July 10, 2020; Commerce's Letter, ``Petition for 
the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Seamless Carbon and Alloy 
Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea: 
Second Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 13, 2020; Commerce's 
Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from the Republic of Korea: Third Supplemental Questions,'' dated 
July 16, 2020; and Commerce's Letter, ``Petition for the Imposition 
of Countervailing Duties on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea: Fourth 
Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 20, 2020.
    \3\ See Petitioner's Letter, ``Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, the 
Republic of Korea, Russia, and Ukraine: Response to General Issues 
Questionnaire,'' dated July 15, 2020 (General Issues Supplement); 
see also Petitioner's Letter, ``Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia: Answers to Commerce 
Department Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 16, 2020 (Russia 
Supplement); Petitioner's Letter, ``Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel 
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia: Answers to Commerce 
Department Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 14, 2020 (First 
Korea Supplement); Petitioner's Letter, ``Seamless Carbon and Alloy 
Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Korea: Answers to 
Commerce Department Second Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 15, 
2020 (Second Korea Supplement); Petitioner's Letter, ``Seamless 
Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Korea: 
Answers to Commerce Department Third Supplemental Questions,'' dated 
July 20, 2020 (Third Korea Supplement); and Petitioner's Letter,'' 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from Korea: Answers to Commerce Department Supplemental Questions,'' 
dated July 21, 2020 (Fourth Korea Supplement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of Korea 
(GOK) and the Government of Russia (GOR) are providing countervailable 
subsidies, within the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to 
producers of seamless pipe in Korea and Russia, and that such imports 
are materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, the 
domestic industry producing seamless pipe in the United States. 
Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for 
those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD investigation, 
the Petitions were accompanied by information reasonably available to 
the petitioner supporting its allegations.
    Commerce finds that the petitioner filed the Petitions on behalf of 
the domestic industry because the petitioner is an interested party, as 
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that the 
petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the 
initiation of the requested CVD investigations.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See ``Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions'' 
section, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    Because the Petitions were filed on July 8, 2020, the period of 
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigations

    The merchandise covered by these investigations are seamless pipe 
from Korea and Russia. For a full description of the scope of these 
investigations, see the Appendix to this notice.

Comments on Scope of the Investigations

    On July 13, 2020, Commerce requested further information from the 
petitioner regarding the proposed scope to ensure that the scope 
language in the Petitions is an accurate reflection of the products for 
which the domestic industry is seeking relief.\6\ On July 15, 2020, the 
petitioner revised the scope.\7\ The description of the merchandise 
covered by these investigations, as described in the Appendix to this 
notice, reflects these clarifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See General Issues Questionnaire.
    \7\ See General Issues Supplement at 4 and Exhibit 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are 
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding 
product coverage (scope).\8\ Commerce will consider all comments 
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with 
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary 
determination. If scope comments include factual information,\9\ all 
such factual information should be limited to public information. To 
facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, Commerce requests that 
all interested parties submit scope comments by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
(ET) on August 17, 2020, which is 20 calendar days from the signature 
date of this notice. Any rebuttal comments, which may include factual 
information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on August 27, 2020, which is 
10 calendar days from the initial comment deadline.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Countervailing Duties, 62 FR 27323 (May 19, 1997).
    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce requests that any factual information the parties consider 
relevant to the scope of the investigations be submitted during this 
time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that additional 
factual information pertaining to the scope of the investigations may 
be relevant, the party may contact Commerce and request permission to 
submit the additional information. All such comments must be filed on 
the records of the concurrent Antidumping and CVD investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically using 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS), unless an exception 
applies.\11\ An electronically filed document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by the time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and 
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014) for details of Commerce's electronic filing 
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on using ACCESS 
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx and a handbook 
can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce 
notified the GOK and the GOR of the receipt of the Petitions and 
provided an opportunity for consultations with respect to the 
Petitions.\12\ Commerce held consultations with the GOK and the GOR on 
July 21, 2020 and July 23, 2020, respectively.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from the Republic of Korea: Invitation for Consultations,'' dated 
July 9, 2020; see also Commerce's Letter, ``Countervailing Duty 
Petition on Seamless Carbon and Alloy Standard, Line, and Pressure 
Pipe from the Russian Federation: Invitation for Consultations,'' 
dated July 10, 2020.
    \13\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with Government Officials 
from the Government of the Republic of Korea on the Countervailing 
Duty Petition Regarding Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, 
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea,'' dated July 22, 
2020; see also Memorandum, ``Consultations with Officials from the 
Government of the Russian Federation,'' dated July 27, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petitions

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for

[[Page 47172]]

more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like 
product, Commerce shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other 
information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, 
as required by subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support 
using a statistically valid sampling method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which 
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has 
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the 
ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic 
like product,\14\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a 
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination 
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may 
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences 
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \15\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. 
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F. 2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigations.\16\ Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the record, we have determined that seamless pipe, as 
defined in the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product, and 
we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like 
product.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 12-14 and Exhibits I-7 and 
I-8.
    \17\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to these cases and information regarding industry support, 
see the Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from the Republic of Korea (Korea CVD Initiation Checklist), at 
Attachment II, Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Seamless Carbon and Alloy 
Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, the 
Republic of Korea, Russia, and Ukraine (Attachment II); see also 
Countervailing Duty Investigation Initiation Checklist: Seamless 
Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from Russia 
(Russia CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II. These 
checklists are dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 
notice and on file electronically via ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In determining whether the petitioner has standing under section 
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data 
contained in the Petitions with reference to the domestic like product 
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the appendix to 
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioner provided its 
own shipments of the domestic like product in 2019, as well as the 
shipments of United States Steel Corporation, a supporter of the 
Petitions, and compared this to the estimated total shipments of the 
domestic like product for the entire domestic industry.\18\ Because 
total industry production data for the domestic like product for 2019 
are not reasonably available to the petitioner, and the petitioner has 
established that shipments are a reasonable proxy for production 
data,\19\ we have relied on the data provided by the petitioner for 
purposes of measuring industry support.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 4-5 and Exhibits I-1 
through I-3; see also General Issues Supplement at 5-10 and Exhibit 
6.
    \19\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 4-5 and Exhibit I-1.
    \20\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 4-5 and Exhibits I-1 
through I-3; see also General Issues Supplement at 5-10 and Exhibits 
6, 9, and 10. For further discussion, see Attachment II of country-
specific CVD Initiation Checklists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our review of the data provided in the Petitions, the General 
Issues Supplement, and other information readily available to Commerce 
indicates that the petitioner has established industry support for the 
Petitions.\21\ First, the Petitions established support from domestic 
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total 
production of the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not 
required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support 
(e.g., polling).\22\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have 
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section 
702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers) 
who support the Petitions account for at least 25 percent of the total 
production of the domestic like product.\23\ Finally, the domestic 
producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry 
support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic 
producers (or workers) who support the Petitions account for more than 
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by 
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, 
the Petitions.\24\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petitions 
were filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of 
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Attachment II of the country-specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \22\ Id.; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
    \23\ See Attachment II of the country-specific CVD Initiation 
Checklists.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because Russia and Korea are ``Subsidies Agreement Countries'' 
within the meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of 
the Act applies to these investigations. Accordingly, the ITC must 
determine whether imports of the subject merchandise from Russia and/or 
Korea materially injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. 
industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner 
alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold 
provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 18 and Exhibit I-10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by a significant and increasing volume of subject imports; 
reduced market share; underselling and price depression or suppression; 
declines in production, shipments, capacity utilization, and employment 
variables; and declining financial performance.\27\ We have assessed 
the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material injury, 
threat of material injury, causation, as well as negligibility, and we 
have determined that these allegations are properly supported by 
adequate evidence, and meet the statutory requirements for 
initiation.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See Volume I of the Petitions at 1, 17-34 and Exhibits I-1, 
I-2, I-10, and I-12 through I-15.
    \28\ See country-specific CVD Initiation Checklists at 
Attachment III, Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material 
Injury and Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Petitions Covering Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, 
and Pressure Pipe from the Czech Republic, the Republic of Korea, 
Russia, and Ukraine.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47173]]

Initiation of CVD Investigations

    Based upon the examination of the Petitions on seamless pipe from 
Korea and Russia, we find that the Petitions meet the requirements of 
section 702 of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD 
investigation to determine whether imports of seamless pipe from Korea 
and Russia benefit from countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOK 
and the GOR, respectively. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our 
preliminary determinations no later than 65 days after the date of this 
initiation.

Korea

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 38 alleged 
programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to 
initiate on each program, see Korea Initiation Checklist. A public 
version of the initiation checklist for this investigation is available 
on ACCESS.

Russia

    Based on our review of the Petitions, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 11 alleged 
programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision to 
initiate on each program, see Russia Initiation Checklist. A public 
version of the initiation checklist for this investigation is available 
on ACCESS.

Respondent Selection

    The petitioner named three companies in Korea and two companies in 
Russia as producers/exporters of seamless pipe.\29\ Commerce intends to 
follow its standard practice in CVD investigations and calculate 
company-specific subsidy rates in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See Volume I of the Petitions at Exhibit I-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event Commerce determines that the number of companies is 
large and it cannot individually examine each company based upon 
Commerce's resources, where appropriate, Commerce intends to select 
respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for 
U.S. imports of seamless pipe from Korea and Russia during the POI 
under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
numbers listed in the ``Scope of the Investigations,'' in the appendix.
    On July 21, 2020, Commerce released CBP data for U.S. imports of 
seamless pipe from Korea and Russia under Administrative Protective 
Order (APO) to all parties with access to information protected by APO 
and indicated that interested parties wishing to comment regarding the 
CBP data and respondent selection must do so within three business days 
of the publication date of the notice of initiation of these CVD 
investigations.\30\ Commerce will not accept rebuttal comments 
regarding the CBP data or respondent selection. Interested parties must 
submit applications for disclosure under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may be found on 
the Commerce's website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/apo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Imports 
of Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from the Russian Federation: Release of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection Data,'' dated July 21, 2020; see also Commerce's Letter, 
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe 
from the Republic of Korea--Release of Customs Data,'' dated July 
21, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An 
electronically filed document must be received successfully, in its 
entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m. on the date noted above, 
unless an exception applies. Commerce intends to finalize its decisions 
regarding respondent selection within 20 days of the publication of 
this notice.

Distribution of Copies of the Petitions

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petitions has been 
provided to the GOK and GOR via ACCESS.
    Furthermore, to the extent practicable, Commerce will attempt to 
provide a copy of the public version of the Petitions to each exporter 
named in the Petitions, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

ITC Notification

    Commerce will notify the ITC of its initiation, as required by 
section 702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determination by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date 
on which the Petitions were filed, whether there is a reasonable 
indication that imports of seamless pipe from Korea and Russia are 
materially injuring or threatening material injury to a U.S. 
industry.\31\ A negative ITC determination for any country will result 
in the investigation being terminated with respect to that country.\32\ 
Otherwise, the investigations will proceed according to statutory and 
regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See section 733(a) of the Act.
    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence 
placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual 
information described in (i)-(iv). Any party, when submitting factual 
information, must specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 
351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted \33\ and, if the 
information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual 
information already on the record, to provide an explanation 
identifying the information already on the record that the factual 
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.\34\ Time limits for 
the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, 
which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual 
information being submitted. Parties wishing to submit factual 
information in this investigation are asked to review the regulations 
prior to submitting factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \34\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request 
will be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the 
time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301. For submissions that are 
due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be 
considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date. 
Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different 
time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for 
submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such 
a case, Commerce will inform parties in a letter or memorandum of the 
deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must 
be filed to be considered timely. An extension

[[Page 47174]]

request must be made in a separate, standalone submission; under 
limited circumstances Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for 
the extension of time limits. Parties should review Extension of Time 
Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at 
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior 
to submitting extension requests or factual information in this 
investigation.

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\35\ 
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR 
351.303(g).\36\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification 
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \36\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Instructions for filing such 
applications may be found on the Commerce website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/apo. Parties wishing to participate in this 
investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of 19 CFR 
351.103(d) (e.g., by filing a letter of appearance). Note that Commerce 
has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving 
documents containing business proprietary information until further 
notice.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements 
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702 and 
777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: July 28, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigations

    The merchandise covered by the scope of these investigations is 
seamless carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) pipes 
and redraw hollows, less than or equal to 16 inches (406.4 mm) in 
nominal outside diameter, regardless of wall-thickness, 
manufacturing process (e.g., hot-finished or cold-drawn), end finish 
(e.g., plain end, beveled end, upset end, threaded, or threaded and 
coupled), or surface finish (e.g., bare, lacquered or coated). 
Redraw hollows are any unfinished carbon or alloy steel (other than 
stainless steel) pipe or ``hollow profiles'' suitable for cold 
finishing operations, such as cold drawing, to meet the American 
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or American Petroleum 
Institute (API) specifications referenced below, or comparable 
specifications. Specifically included within the scope are seamless 
carbon and alloy steel (other than stainless steel) standard, line, 
and pressure pipes produced to the ASTM A-53, ASTM A-106, ASTM A-
333, ASTM A-334, ASTM A-589, ASTM A-795, ASTM A-1024, and the API 5L 
specifications, or comparable specifications, and meeting the 
physical parameters described above, regardless of application, with 
the exception of the exclusions discussed below.
    Specifically excluded from the scope of the investigations are: 
(1) All pipes meeting aerospace, hydraulic, and bearing tubing 
specifications, including pipe produced to the ASTM A-822 standard; 
(2) all pipes meeting the chemical requirements of ASTM A-335, 
whether finished or unfinished; and (3) unattached couplings. Also 
excluded from the scope of the investigations are all mechanical, 
boiler, condenser and heat exchange tubing, except when such 
products conform to the dimensional requirements, i.e., outside 
diameter and wall thickness, of ASTM A-53, ASTM A-106 or API 5L 
specifications.
    Subject seamless standard, line, and pressure pipe are normally 
entered under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) subheadings 7304.19.1020, 7304.19.1030, 7304.19.1045, 
7304.19.1060, 7304.19.5020, 7304.19.5050, 7304.31.6050, 
7304.39.0016, 7304.39.0020, 7304.39.0024, 7304.39.0028, 
7304.39.0032, 7304.39.0036, 7304.39.0040, 7304.39.0044, 
7304.39.0048, 7304.39.0052, 7304.39.0056, 7304.39.0062, 
7304.39.0068, 7304.39.0072, 7304.51.5005, 7304.51.5060, 
7304.59.6000, 7304.59.8010, 7304.59.8015, 7304.59.8020, 
7304.59.8025, 7304.59.8030, 7304.59.8035, 7304.59.8040, 
7304.59.8045, 7304.59.8050, 7304.59.8055, 7304.59.8060, 
7304.59.8065, and 7304.59.8070. The HTSUS subheadings and 
specifications are provided for convenience and customs purposes; 
the written description of the scope is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2020-16918 Filed 8-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P