[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 129 (Monday, July 6, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40165-40168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13893]



[[Page 40165]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2019-0217; FRL-10011-51-Region 4]


Air Plan Approvals; KY; Prevention of Significant Deterioration 
and Modeling Infrastructure Requirements for 2015 Ozone NAAQS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve portions of the Kentucky infrastructure State Implementation 
Plan (SIP) submission for the 2015 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air 
Quality Standards (NAAQS) submitted to EPA on January 11, 2019. 
Whenever EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, the Clean Air Act (CAA 
or Act) requires that states adopt and submit a SIP submission to 
establish that the state's implementation plan meets infrastructure 
requirements for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of 
each such NAAQS. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve portions of 
the Kentucky infrastructure SIP submission that address the prevention 
of significant deterioration (PSD) and modeling requirements for the 
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA is proposing to approve these portions of 
the submission as they are consistent with the CAA.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 27, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2019-0217, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment 
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andres Febres, Air Regulatory 
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and 
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is 
(404) 562-8966. Mr. Febres can also be reached via electronic mail at 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On October 1, 2015, EPA promulgated a revised primary and secondary 
NAAQS for ozone, revising the 8-hour ozone standards from 0.075 parts 
per million (ppm) to a new more protective level of 0.070 ppm. See 80 
FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). Pursuant to section 110(a)(1) of the CAA, 
states are required to make a SIP submission to address the 
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS and the 
applicable requirements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA within three 
years after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS or within such 
shorter period as EPA may prescribe. Section 110(a)(2) requires states 
to address basic SIP elements such as requirements for monitoring, 
basic program requirements, and legal authority that are designed to 
assure attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. This particular type of 
SIP submission is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure SIP.'' 
\1\ States were required to make such SIP submissions for the 2015 8-
hour ozone NAAQS to EPA no later than October 1, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In infrastructure SIP submissions, states generally certify 
evidence of compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA 
through a combination of state regulations and statutes, some of 
which have been incorporated into the SIP. In addition, certain 
federally-approved, non-SIP regulations may also be appropriate for 
demonstrating compliance with sections 110(a)(1) and (2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA is proposing to approve the portions of Kentucky's January 11, 
2019,\2\ SIP submission provided to EPA through the Kentucky Division 
of Air Quality (KY DAQ) that address the PSD-related infrastructure SIP 
requirements for major sources under sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prohibiting interference with PSD in other 
states), 110(a)(2)(J) and the modeling infrastructure requirements of 
110(a)(2)(K) for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These provisions are 
discussed in further detail in Sections IV and V of this proposed 
action. All other applicable infrastructure SIP requirements for the 
2015 ozone NAAQS have been or will be addressed in separate 
rulemakings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Commonwealth of Kentucky submitted its infrastructure 
submission through the State Planning Electronic Collaboration 
System on January 9, 2019; however, the cover letter of the 
submittal is dated January 11, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. What is EPA's approach to the review of infrastructure SIP 
submissions?

    As discussed in section I, whenever EPA promulgates a new or 
revised NAAQS, CAA section 110(a)(1) requires states to submit 
infrastructure SIP submissions that meet the various requirements of 
CAA section 110(a)(2), as applicable. Due to ambiguity in some of the 
language of CAA section 110(a)(2), EPA believes that it is appropriate 
to interpret these provisions in the specific context of acting on 
infrastructure SIP submissions. EPA has previously provided 
comprehensive guidance on the application of these provisions through a 
guidance document for infrastructure SIP submissions and through 
regional actions on infrastructure submissions.\3\ Unless otherwise 
noted in the following sections, EPA is following that existing 
approach in acting on this submission. In addition, in the context of 
acting on such infrastructure submissions, EPA evaluates the submitting 
state's implementation plan for facial compliance with statutory and 
regulatory requirements, not for the state's implementation of its 
SIP.\4\ EPA has other authority to address any issues concerning a 
state's implementation of the rules, regulations, consent orders, and 
so forth that comprise its SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA explains and elaborates on these ambiguities and its 
approach to address them in its September 13, 2013, Infrastructure 
SIP Guidance (available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/guidance_on_infrastructure_sip_elements_multipollutant_final_sept_2013.pdf), as well as in numerous agency actions, including EPA's prior 
action on the Kentucky infrastructure SIP to address the 2010 
Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS. See 81 FR 41488 (November 21, 2016).
    \4\ See Mont. Envtl. Info. Ctr. v. Thomas, 902 F.3d 971 (9th 
Cir. 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What are the infrastructure requirements for PSD-related elements 
and modeling elements for Kentucky?

    Detailed explanations of the specific infrastructure requirements 
addressed by this proposed rulemaking are provided in the following 
discussion. As mentioned, this proposed action only addresses the PSD 
and modeling infrastructure requirements for the 2015 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS. All other infrastructure requirements for

[[Page 40166]]

Kentucky for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS have been or will be addressed 
through separate rulemakings.

a. PSD-Related Elements

    Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Act has three components that must be 
addressed in infrastructure SIP submissions: enforcement, state-wide 
regulation of new and modified minor sources and minor modifications of 
major sources, and PSD permitting of new major sources and major 
modifications in areas designated attainment or unclassifiable for the 
subject NAAQS as required by the CAA title I part C (i.e., the major 
source PSD program).
    Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Act has two components: 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). Each of these components 
have two subparts resulting in four distinct components, commonly 
referred to as ``prongs,'' that states must address in infrastructure 
SIP submissions. The first two prongs, which are codified in section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), are provisions that prohibit any source or other 
type of emissions activity in one state from contributing significantly 
to nonattainment of the NAAQS in another state (``prong 1''), or 
interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS in another state (``prong 
2''). The third and fourth prongs, which are codified in section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), are provisions that prohibit emissions activity in 
one state from interfering with measures required to prevent 
significant deterioration of air quality in another state (``prong 
3''), or to protect visibility in another state (``prong 4'').
    Section 110(a)(2)(J) of the Act has four components related to: (1) 
Consultation with government officials, (2) public notification, (3) 
PSD, and (4) visibility protection.
    This proposed rulemaking addresses the PSD-related requirements of 
sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J). 
With respect to the PSD elements of 110(a)(2)(C) and (J), EPA 
interprets the CAA to require each state to make, for each new or 
revised NAAQS, an infrastructure SIP submission that demonstrates that 
the air agency has a complete PSD permitting program meeting the 
current requirements for all regulated new source review (NSR) 
pollutants. The requirements of element 110(D)(i)(II) (prong 3) may 
also be satisfied when the state's submission demonstrates that the air 
agency has a complete PSD permitting program addressing all regulated 
NSR pollutants. More information on these requirements and EPA's 
rationale for this proposal that Kentucky is meeting these requirements 
for purposes of the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS is provided in sections IV 
and V of this preamble.

b. Modeling Element

    Section 110(a)(2)(K) of the CAA requires that SIPs provide for the 
performance of air quality modeling as prescribed by the EPA so that 
air quality effects from emissions of NAAQS pollutants and their 
precursors can be predicted, and for submission of such data to EPA. 
More information on this requirement and EPA's rationale for this 
proposal that Kentucky is meeting this requirement for purposes of the 
2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS is provided in sections IV and V of this 
preamble.

IV. Applicability of Appendix W for Infrastructure Requirements for 
2015 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS

    On January 17, 2017, EPA promulgated a final rule entitled 
``Revisions to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Enhancements to the 
AERMOD Dispersion Modeling System and Incorporation of Approaches To 
Address Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter'' (also referred to as the 
2017 Guideline).\5\ See 82 FR 5182. The preamble to the 2017 Guideline, 
in the `Dates' section says:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ EPA's Guideline on Air Quality Models is codified at 40 CFR 
part 51, appendix W and is generically referred to as Guideline 
herein.

    For all regulatory applications covered under the Guideline, 
except for transportation conformity, the changes to the appendix A 
preferred models and revisions to the requirements and 
recommendations of the Guideline must be integrated into the 
regulatory processes of respective reviewing authorities and 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
followed by applicants by no later than January 17, 2018.

For purposes of infrastructure SIP requirements, regulatory 
applications of the Guideline include the PSD elements of CAA sections 
110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J). EPA's 
PSD regulations at 40 CFR 51.166(l) require SIP PSD programs to base 
air quality modeling on the Guideline. States were required to 
integrate the 2017 Guideline into their PSD programs by January 17, 
2018. Additionally, a state may also rely on the 2017 Guideline to 
satisfy the modeling requirements of Section 110(a)(2)(K).
    The most direct way for states to meet this requirement is to 
integrate the 2017 Guideline is to revise the regulations in their SIP 
to incorporate the 2017 Guideline. However, a state may also meet this 
requirement by showing that its existing SIP-approved regulations 
provide the state with the authority to integrate and implement the 
requirements and recommendations of the current version of EPA's 
Guideline (i.e. those reflected in the 2017 Guideline). Of most 
relevance here, all versions of the Guideline, including 2017 and 
earlier versions, as well as 40 CFR 51.166(l), allow the use of an 
``alternative model'' if the state or permit applicant demonstrates to 
EPA that the alternative is equivalent to or an improvement over 
``preferred models'' in the Guideline. As EPA made clear in 
promulgating the 2017 Guideline, the 2017 version incorporated and 
approved air quality models with scientific updates and associated 
model performance improvements relative to the preferred models in 
earlier versions of the Guideline. Thus, states with references to 
earlier versions of the Guideline may be able to rely upon their 
authority to use alternative models, in conjunction with the EPA's 
rulemaking record from the 2017 Guideline, to use an updated model.

V. What is EPA's analysis of how Kentucky addressed relevant portions 
of PSD-related elements and modeling elements for the 2015 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS?

    EPA's analysis of Kentucky's January 11, 2019, infrastructure SIP 
submission, as further clarified in a February 4, 2020, letter, related 
to the PSD and modeling elements for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS is 
provided in this section.

a. PSD-Related Elements

    As discussed, this proposed rulemaking relates to the PSD-related 
requirements of sections 110(a)(2)(C), 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), 
and 110(a)(2)(J). In this section, EPA provides its analysis of these 
three sub-elements.
1. 110(a)(2)(C) Program for Construction or Modification of Stationary 
Sources (PSD)
    For the PSD program sub-element of section 110(a)(2)(C), EPA 
interprets the CAA to require that a state's infrastructure SIP 
submission for a particular NAAQS demonstrate that the state has a 
complete PSD permitting program in place meeting applicable PSD 
requirements for all regulated NSR pollutants. As detailed in EPA's 
September 2013 infrastructure SIP guidance, a state's PSD permitting 
program is complete for this sub-element (and prong 3 of D(i)(II), and 
J related to PSD) if EPA has already approved or is simultaneously 
approving the state's implementation

[[Page 40167]]

plan with respect to all PSD requirements that are due under EPA 
regulations or the CAA on or before the date of EPA's proposed action 
on the infrastructure SIP submission.
    Kentucky's infrastructure SIP submission cites several SIP-approved
    regulations under Chapters 50 and 51, including the following: 401 
KAR 51:010,\6\ Attainment status designations; 401 KAR 51:017, 
Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality; and 401 KAR 
50:040, Air quality models, to meet the PSD program requirements of 
section 110(a)(2)(C). These SIP-approved regulations provide that new 
major sources and major modifications in areas of the Commonwealth 
designated attainment or unclassifiable for any given NAAQS are subject 
to a federally-approved PSD permitting program meeting all the current 
structural requirements of part C of title I of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Throughout this rulemaking, unless otherwise indicated, the 
term ``Kentucky Administrative Regulations'' or ``KAR'' indicates 
that the cited regulation has been approved into Kentucky's 
federally-approved SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed, EPA's PSD regulations at 40 CFR 51.166(l) require 
states to conduct modeling in accordance with the Guideline, and EPA 
required states to integrate the 2017 Guideline into their regulatory 
process by January 17, 2018. Therefore, to meet current structural PSD 
requirements, Kentucky is required to use the 2017 Guideline for PSD 
modeling or provide a demonstration that use of an alternative model 
equivalent to or an improvement over the EPA-preferred model is being 
utilized.
    The Kentucky SIP at 401 KAR 51:017 establishes the Commonwealth's 
PSD program and requires that modeling follow the EPA's Guideline on 
Air Quality Models. Additionally, 401 KAR 50:040--Air Quality Models--
provides that ``[a]ll estimates of ambient concentrations required 
under the administrative regulations of the Division for Air Quality 
shall be based on the applicable air quality models, data bases, and 
other requirements specified in the `Guidelines on Air Quality Models' 
(OAQPS 1.2-080, U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and 
Standards).'' Kentucky's SIP-approved rule 401 KAR 50:015 provides 
incorporations by reference for documents and federal regulations 
referenced in the Commonwealth's air quality rules and incorporates the 
1986 version of the Guideline.
    On February 4, 2020, KY DAQ provided to EPA a letter related to the 
use of EPA's Guideline, clarifying that, pursuant to 401 KAR 50:040 and 
401 KAR 51:017, the Commonwealth has the authority to use alternative 
modeling, and that modeling based on the Guideline, as published on 
January 17, 2017, is the most appropriate.\7\ Specifically, KY DAQ 
explains in the letter that 401 KAR 50:040, Section 1(2) states: 
``Where an air quality impact model specified in the `Guideline on Air 
Quality Models' is inappropriate, the model may be modified or another 
model substituted subject to the approval of the cabinet.'' \8\ 
Additionally, KY DAQ explains that 401 KAR 51:017, Section 10(2) 
states: ``If an air quality model specified in 40 CFR part 51, appendix 
W, is inappropriate, the model may be modified or another model 
substituted.'' KY DAQ concludes that ``[i]n accordance with these 
provisions, the Division has made a determination that the most 
appropriate air quality modeling guidance to use is the version of 40 
CFR part 51, appendix W, as published January 17, 2017.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See February 4, 2020, letter ``RE: Clarification of the use 
of appendix W within Kentucky's 2015 8-hour Ozone Infrastructure SIP 
submittal'' from Melissa Duff, Director of Division of Air Quality 
for Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet, Department of 
Environmental Protection to Mary S. Walker, Regional Administrator 
for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4. The February 4, 
2020, letter is in the docket for this proposed rulemaking.
    \8\ Section 3 of the Guideline and the PSD rules at 40 CFR 
51.166(l)(2) allow the use of alternative models upon approval by 
Regional Administrators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As we have explained, states with references to earlier versions of 
the Guideline may be able to rely upon their authority under the 
earlier versions of the Guideline to use alternative models, in 
conjunction with the EPA's regulatory record from the 2017 Guideline, 
to establish their authority to use the 2017 Guideline. EPA has 
evaluated Kentucky's January 11, 2019, submittal and the February 4, 
2020, letter and is proposing to make the determination that Kentucky 
has demonstrated that it has the authority to use the 2017 Guideline, 
and notes that the February 4, 2020, letter includes KY DAQ's 
determination that the 2017 Guideline is most appropriate for use. 
Accordingly, EPA is proposing to approve Kentucky's use of the 2017 
Guideline as outlined in KY DAQ's February 4, 2020, letter and is 
proposing to find that Kentucky's infrastructure SIP submission 
demonstrates that new major sources and major modifications in areas of 
the Commonwealth designated attainment or unclassifiable for the 
specified NAAQS are subject to a federally-approved PSD permitting 
program meeting all the current structural requirements of part C of 
title I of the CAA to satisfy the infrastructure SIP PSD elements. 
Thus, EPA is proposing to conclude that Kentucky's infrastructure SIP 
submission, supplemented with the February 4, 2020, letter, meets the 
requirements of 110(a)(2)(C) for the infrastructure requirements for 
the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
2. 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--Prong 3
    With regard to prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), a state 
may meet this requirement by a confirmation in its infrastructure SIP 
submission that new major sources and major modifications in the state 
are subject to a PSD program meeting current structural requirements of 
part C and a nonattainment NSR (NNSR) program, if the state contains a 
nonattainment area that has the potential to impact PSD in another 
state. To meet the requirements of prong 3 of CAA section 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), Kentucky cites to its PSD program found in the 
Kentucky SIP at 401 KAR 51:017, Prevention of significant deterioration 
of air quality, and 401 KAR 50:040, Air quality models, in addition to 
the following SIP-approved regulations: 401 KAR 51:010, Attainment 
status designations; 401 KAR 51:052, Review of new sources in or 
impacting upon nonattainment areas; and 401 KAR 52:100, Public, 
affected state, and US EPA Review. As already discussed in more detail 
in the CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) section of this document, Kentucky's 
SIP contains the relevant provisions to satisfy the current structural 
PSD requirements to meet prong 3 and a SIP-approved NNSR program at 401 
KAR 51:052, Review of new sources in or impacting upon nonattainment 
areas to address prong 3 for any areas of the Commonwealth designated 
as nonattainment. EPA is proposing to determine that Kentucky's SIP is 
adequate for permitting of major sources and major modifications to 
prevent interference with PSD in other states related to the 2015 8-
hour ozone NAAQS for CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3).
3. 110(a)(2)(J) PSD
    With regard to the PSD element of CAA section 110(a)(2)(J), this 
requirement is met by a state's confirmation in an infrastructure SIP 
submission that the state has a SIP-approved PSD program meeting all 
the current requirements of part C of title I of the CAA for all 
regulated NSR pollutants. To meet element J, Kentucky's infrastructure 
SIP submission cites to a number of SIP-approved regulations including 
401 KAR 51:017, Prevention of significant deterioration of air quality. 
As already

[[Page 40168]]

discussed in more detail in the CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) section of 
this document, Kentucky's SIP contains the relevant provisions to 
satisfy the structural PSD requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(J). 
EPA is proposing to determine that Kentucky's SIP is adequate for the 
PSD element of CAA section 110(a)(2)(J).

b. 110(a)(2)(K) Modeling Element

    Section 110(a)(2)(K) of the CAA requires that SIPs provide for the 
performance of air quality modeling as prescribed by the EPA so that 
air quality effects of emissions of NAAQS pollutants and their 
precursors can be predicted, and for submission of such data to EPA. KY 
DAQ conducts air quality modeling as set forth in Kentucky's 
regulation, 40 KAR 50:040, Air Quality Models and reports the results 
of such modeling to EPA. Kentucky's SIP submission also refers to a 
number of other SIP-approved regulations to demonstrate that it meets 
the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(K). 40 KAR 50:040, Air 
Quality Models provides that ``[a]ll estimates of ambient 
concentrations required under the administrative regulations of the 
Division for Air Quality shall be based on the applicable air quality 
models, data bases, and other requirements specified in the `Guidelines 
on Air Quality Models' (OAQPS 1.2-080, U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality 
Planning and Standards).'' KY DAQ uses ambient ozone modeling, in 
conjunction with pre- and post-construction ambient air monitoring to 
track local and regional scale changes in ozone concentrations. As 
already discussed in the CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) section of this 
document, KY DAQ has provided assurances that it has the authority and 
intention to use the 2017 Guideline under this regulatory provision.
    Additionally, the Commonwealth supports a regional effort to 
coordinate the development of emissions inventories and conduct 
regional modeling for several NAAQS, including the 2015 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS, for the Southeastern states. Taken as a whole, the 
Commonwealth's air quality regulations and practices demonstrate that 
KY DAQ has the authority to provide relevant data through the 
performance of modeling as prescribed by EPA for the purpose of 
predicting the effect on ambient air quality of any emissions of any 
pollutant for which a NAAQS has been promulgated, and to provide such 
information to EPA's Administrator upon request. EPA is proposing to 
approve Kentucky's infrastructure SIP submission with respect to CAA 
section 110(a)(2)(K).

VI. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the portions of Kentucky's January 11, 
2019, 2015 8-hour ozone infrastructure SIP submission that address the 
PSD-related requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(2)(C), 
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) (prong 3), and 110(a)(2)(J), and modeling 
requirements related to CAA section 110(a)(2)(K). All other applicable 
infrastructure requirements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS have been or will 
be addressed in separate rulemakings.

VII. Statutory Review

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because this action is not significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose information collection burdens under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandates or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does 
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 23, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020-13893 Filed 7-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P