[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 126 (Tuesday, June 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39055-39065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13853]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

12 CFR Part 1024

[Docket No. CFPB-2020-0022]


Treatment of Certain COVID-19 Related Loss Mitigation Options 
Under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) (Regulation X)

AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

ACTION: Interim final rule with request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is 
issuing this interim final rule to amend Regulation X. The amendments 
temporarily permit mortgage servicers to offer certain loss mitigation 
options based on the evaluation of an incomplete loss mitigation 
application. Eligible loss mitigation options, among other things, must 
permit borrowers to delay paying certain amounts until the mortgage 
loan is refinanced, the mortgaged property is sold, the term of the 
mortgage loan ends, or, for a mortgage insured by the Federal Housing 
Administration (FHA), the mortgage insurance terminates. These amounts 
include, without limitation, all principal and interest payments 
forborne through payment forbearance programs made available to 
borrowers experiencing financial hardships due, directly or indirectly, 
to the COVID-19 emergency, including a payment forbearance program 
offered pursuant to section 4022 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and 
Economic Security Act. These amounts also include principal and 
interest payments that are due and unpaid by borrowers experiencing 
financial hardships due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 
emergency.

DATES: This interim final rule is effective on July 1, 2020. Comments 
must be received on or before August 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CFPB-2020-
0022, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email: [email protected]. Include Docket 
No. CFPB-2020-0022 in the subject line of the message.
     Hand Delivery/Mail/Courier: Comment Intake, Bureau of 
Consumer Financial Protection, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552. 
Please note that due to circumstances associated with the COVID-19 
pandemic, the Bureau discourages the submission of comments by hand 
delivery, mail, or courier.
    Instructions: The Bureau encourages the early submission of 
comments. All submissions should include the agency name and docket 
number for this rulemaking. Because paper mail in the Washington, DC 
area and at the Bureau is subject to delay, and in light of 
difficulties associated with mail and hand deliveries during the COVID-
19 pandemic, commenters are encouraged to submit comments 
electronically. In general, all comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov. In addition, once the 
Bureau's headquarters reopens, comments will be available for public 
inspection and copying at 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552, on 
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern 
Time. At that time, you can make an appointment to inspect the 
documents by telephoning 202-435-9169.
    All comments, including attachments and other supporting materials, 
will become part of the public record and subject to public disclosure. 
Proprietary information or sensitive personal information, such as 
account numbers, Social Security numbers, or names of

[[Page 39056]]

other individuals, should not be included. Comments will not be edited 
to remove any identifying or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel Singerman, Counsel, or Terry J. 
Randall, Senior Counsel, Office of Regulations, at 202-435-7700 or 
https://reginquiries.consumerfinance.gov/. If you require this document 
in an alternative electronic format, please contact 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Summary of the Interim Final Rule

    Title 12 CFR part 1024 (Regulation X) generally requires servicers 
to obtain a complete loss-mitigation application before evaluating a 
mortgage borrower for a loss-mitigation option, such as a loan 
modification or short sale.\1\ Regulation X provides an exception from 
this requirement for certain short-term loss mitigation options.\2\ Due 
to the particular needs of mortgage servicers and borrowers during the 
novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic emergency (COVID-19 
emergency), the Bureau is amending Regulation X to temporarily permit 
mortgage servicers to offer certain loss mitigation options without 
obtaining a complete loss mitigation application. Servicers may offer 
eligible loss mitigation options to a borrower who has received a 
payment forbearance program made available to borrowers experiencing a 
financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 
emergency, including one offered pursuant to section 4022 of the 
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act),\3\ or 
who has had other principal and interest payments that are due and 
unpaid as a result of a financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, 
to the COVID-19 emergency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Section 1024.41(b)(1) (requiring servicer to exercise 
reasonable diligence in obtaining documents and information to 
complete a loss mitigation application); Sec.  1024.41(c)(1)(i) 
(requiring evaluation of borrower for all loss mitigation options 
available to the borrower if the servicer receives a complete loss 
mitigation application more than 37 days before a scheduled 
foreclosure sale); and Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(i) (prohibiting servicer 
from offering a loss mitigation option based on an evaluation of any 
information provided by a borrower in connection with an incomplete 
loss mitigation application). Small servicers, as defined in 
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.41, are not subject to these requirements. 
12 CFR 1024.30(b)(1).
    \2\ 12 CFR 1024.41(c)(2)(iii).
    \3\ Public Law 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The amendment conditions eligibility for the new exception on the 
loss mitigation option satisfying three criteria. First, the loss 
mitigation option must permit the borrower to delay paying certain 
amounts until the mortgage loan is refinanced, the mortgaged property 
is sold, the term of the mortgage loan ends, or, for a mortgage insured 
by FHA, the mortgage insurance terminates. These amounts include, 
without limitation, all principal and interest payments forborne under 
a payment forbearance program made available to borrowers experiencing 
a financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 
emergency, including one made pursuant to the Coronavirus Economic 
Stabilization Act, section 4022 (15 U.S.C. 9056). These amounts also 
include, without limitation all other principal and interest payments 
that are due and unpaid by a borrower experiencing financial hardship 
due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency. For purposes of 
this criterion, the term of the mortgage loan means the term of the 
mortgage loan according to the obligation between the parties in effect 
when the borrower is offered the loss mitigation option. Second, any 
amounts that the borrower may delay paying through the loss mitigation 
option do not accrue interest; the servicer does not charge any fee in 
connection with the loss mitigation option; and the servicer waives all 
existing late charges, penalties, stop payment fees, or similar charges 
promptly upon the borrower's acceptance of the loss mitigation option. 
Third, the borrower's acceptance of the loss mitigation offer must 
resolve any prior delinquency. These criteria maintain important 
protections for borrowers and are intended to align with the COVID-19 
payment deferral option announced by the Federal Housing Finance Agency 
(FHFA), discussed in part II, and other similar programs.
    The interim final rule also excludes servicers from certain 
regulatory requirements if a borrower accepts an option offered 
pursuant to the new exception. Specifically, the interim final rule 
provides that the servicer is not required to continue the reasonable 
diligence efforts Sec.  1024.41(b)(1) otherwise requires or send the 
acknowledgement notice Sec.  1024.41(b)(2) otherwise requires.

II. Background

A. The Bureau's Regulation X Mortgage Servicing Rules

    In February 2013, the Bureau issued the Mortgage Servicing Rules to 
implement the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974,\4\ and 
included these rules in Regulation X.\5\ The Bureau later clarified and 
revised Regulation X's servicing rules through several additional 
notice-and-comment rulemakings.\6\ In part, these rulemakings were 
intended to address deficiencies in servicers' handling of delinquent 
borrowers and loss mitigation applications during and after the 2008 
financial crisis.\7\ When the housing crisis began, servicers were 
faced with historically high numbers of delinquent mortgages, loan 
modification requests, and in-process foreclosures in their 
portfolios.\8\ Many servicers lacked the infrastructure, trained staff, 
controls, and procedures needed to manage effectively the flood of 
delinquent mortgages they were obligated to handle.\9\ Inadequate 
staffing and

[[Page 39057]]

procedures led to a range of reported problems with servicing of 
delinquent loans, including some servicers misleading borrowers, 
failing to communicate with borrowers, losing or mishandling borrower-
provided documents supporting loan modification requests, and generally 
providing inadequate service to delinquent borrowers.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Public Law 93-533, 88 Stat. 1724 (12 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.).
    \5\ 78 FR 10695 (Feb. 14, 2013). In January 2013, the Bureau 
also issued separate ``Mortgage Servicing Rules Under the Truth in 
Lending Act (Regulation Z)'' (2013 TILA Servicing Final Rule). See 
78 FR 10902 (Feb. 14, 2013). The Bureau conducted an assessment of 
this rule in 2018-19 and released a report detailing its findings in 
early 2019. 2013 RESPA Servicing Rule Assessment Report, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_mortgage-servicing-rule-assessment_report.pdf.
    \6\ Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real Estate 
Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and the Truth in Lending 
Act (Regulation Z), 78 FR 44686 (July 24, 2013); Amendments to the 
2013 Mortgage Rules under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act 
(Regulation B), Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation 
X), and the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z), 78 FR 60382 (Oct. 
1, 2013); Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Rules under the Real 
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (Regulation X) and the Truth in 
Lending Act (Regulation Z), 78 FR 62993 (Oct. 23, 2013); Amendments 
to the 2013 Mortgage Rules Under the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act (Regulation X) and the Truth in Lending Act 
(Regulation Z), 81 FR 72160 (Oct. 19, 2016); Amendments to the 2013 
Mortgage Rules Under RESPA (Regulation X) and TILA (Regulation Z), 
82 FR 30947 (July 5, 2017); Mortgage Servicing Rules Under RESPA 
(Regulation X), 82 FR 47953 (Oct. 16, 2017). The Bureau also issued 
notices providing guidance on the Rule and soliciting comment on the 
Rule. See, e.g., Applicability of Regulation Z's Ability-to-Repay 
Rule to Certain Situations Involving Successors-in-interest, 79 FR 
41631 (July 17, 2014); Safe Harbors from Liability Under the Fair 
Debt Collections Practices Act for Certain Actions in Compliance 
with Mortgage Servicing Rules Under the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act (Regulation X) and the Truth in Lending Act 
(Regulation Z), 81 FR 71977 (Oct. 19, 2016); Policy Guidance on 
Supervisory and Enforcement Priorities Regarding Early Compliance 
With the 2016 Amendments to the 2013 Mortgage Servicing Rules Under 
RESPA (Regulation X) and TILA (Regulation Z), 82 FR 29713 (June 30, 
2017).
    \7\ See generally 78 FR 10699-701.
    \8\ See discussion in Chapter 3 of the 2013 RESPA Servicing Rule 
Assessment Report. 2013 RESPA Servicing Rule Assessment Report, 
https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_mortgage-servicing-rule-assessment_report.pdf.
    \9\ Mortgage Servicing Rules Under the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act (Regulation X), 78 FR 10696, 10700 (Feb. 14, 2013).
    \10\ See U.S. Gov't Accountability Off., GAO-10-634, Troubled 
Asset Relief Program: Further Actions Needed to Fully and Equitably 
Implement Foreclosure Mitigation Actions, at 14-16 (2010), https://www.gao.gov/assets/310/305891.pdf; Hearing on Problems in Mortgage 
Servicing from Modification to Foreclosure Before the S. Comm. on 
Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 111th Cong. 54 (2010) 
(statement of Thomas J. Miller, Att'y Gen. State of Iowa).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau's mortgage servicing rules addressed these concerns by 
establishing procedures that mortgage servicers generally must follow 
in evaluating loss mitigation applications submitted by mortgage 
borrowers.\11\ Among other things, as relevant here, Regulation X 
generally requires servicers to obtain a complete loss-mitigation 
application from a borrower before offering the borrower a loss-
mitigation option, such as a loan modification or short sale.\12\ 
Servicers generally may not offer a loss-mitigation option based upon 
an evaluation of any information provided in connection with an 
incomplete application.\13\ The loss mitigation provisions were 
motivated in part by concerns that some servicers were doing an 
inadequate job of communicating with borrowers regarding loss 
mitigation options,\14\ and that some servicers were unwilling to work 
with borrowers to reach agreement on loss mitigation options.\15\ The 
Bureau intended this restriction to help ensure that borrowers have a 
full and fair opportunity to be evaluated for loss mitigation 
options.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See generally 12 CFR 1024.41. Small servicers, as defined 
in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.41, are generally exempt from these 
requirements. 12 CFR 1024.30(b)(1).
    \12\ 12 CFR 1024.41(b)(1) (requiring servicer to exercise 
reasonable diligence in obtaining documents and information to 
complete a loss mitigation application); Sec.  1024.41(c)(1)(i) 
(requiring evaluation of borrower for all loss mitigation options 
available to the borrower if the servicer receives a complete loss 
mitigation application more than 37 days before a scheduled 
foreclosure sale); and Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(i) (prohibiting servicer 
from offering a loss mitigation option based on an evaluation of any 
information provided by a borrower in connection with an incomplete 
loss mitigation application). Small servicers, as defined in 
Regulation Z, 12 CFR 1026.41, are not subject to these requirements. 
12 CFR 1024.30(b)(1).
    \13\ 12 CFR 1024.41(c)(2)(i).
    \14\ 78 FR at 10807.
    \15\ Id. at 10814.
    \16\ Id. at 10815.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, in issuing these requirements, the Bureau recognized that 
more flexible requirements may be warranted when borrowers are facing 
certain hardships. For example, Regulation X provides flexibility for 
servicers when they offer short-term payment forbearance programs or 
short-term repayment plans, as defined in Regulation X, based upon an 
evaluation of an incomplete application.\17\ In granting this 
flexibility, the Bureau explained that borrowers facing only temporary 
hardships might benefit from a more efficient application process that 
leads to a temporary solution without exhausting the protections under 
Sec.  1024.41 that are determined as of the date a complete application 
is received.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 12 CFR 1024.41(c)(2)(iii); see also comments 41(c)(2)(iii)-
1 and -4 (defining short-term payment forbearance program and short-
term repayment plan for purposes of the regulation).
    \18\ 78 FR at 60400; 81 FR at 72246. Section 1024.41(i) limits 
the circumstances when a servicer must comply with the procedures 
described in Sec.  1024.41. Servicers do not need to comply with the 
procedures described in Sec.  1024.41 if the servicer has previously 
complied with the requirements of Sec.  1024.41 for a complete loss 
mitigation application submitted by the borrower and the borrower 
has been delinquent at all times since submitting the prior complete 
application. Because a servicer who offers a borrower a short-term 
option based on evaluation of an incomplete application pursuant to 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(iii) has not evaluated a complete application 
submitted by the borrower, a servicer would have to comply with the 
procedures described in Sec.  1024.41 if the borrower submits a 
complete application after the servicer offers the borrower a short-
term payment forbearance program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. The CARES Act and COVID-19 Forbearances

    By late March 2020, the COVID-19 emergency was significantly 
affecting the economy. Between March 15 and May 15, 2020, over 35 
million people filed initial jobless claims, and the unemployment rate 
climbed to over 14 percent in April--the highest monthly level since 
1948 when the Bureau of Labor and Statistics started tracking this 
series.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics 
from the Current Population Survey, https://www.bls.gov/ces (last 
visited June 6, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted. Among other things, 
the CARES Act ensures that borrowers experiencing a financial hardship 
due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency and who have 
``Federally backed mortgage loans'' \20\ have access to payment 
forbearance programs (CARES Act forbearance) if they submit a request 
to their mortgage servicer and affirm that they are experiencing a 
financial hardship during the COVID-19 emergency.\21\ By requiring 
servicers to grant CARES Act forbearances to certain borrowers with 
federally backed mortgages (which account for approximately 80 percent 
of mortgage borrowers), the CARES Act established payment forbearance 
as the primary tool that servicers of these loans would use initially 
to assist struggling borrowers during the COVID-19 emergency. The 
Bureau understands that servicers of other mortgages that are not 
``Federally backed mortgage loans'' under the CARES Act may be offering 
similar payment forbearance programs to their borrowers.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The CARES Act defines a ``Federally backed mortgage loan'' 
as any loan which is secured by a first or subordinate lien on 
residential real property (including individual units of 
condominiums and cooperatives) designed principally for the 
occupancy of from one-to-four families that is insured by the 
Federal Housing Administration under title II of the National 
Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et seq.); insured under section 255 of 
the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z-20); guaranteed under 
section 184 or 184A of the Housing and Community Development Act of 
1992 (12 U.S.C. 1715z-13a, 1715z-13b); guaranteed or insured by the 
Department of Veterans Affairs; guaranteed or insured by the 
Department of Agriculture; made by the Department of Agriculture; or 
purchased or securitized by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation or the Federal National Mortgage Association. CARES Act 
section 4022(a)(2).
    \21\ CARES Act section 4022(b). Upon receiving the borrower's 
request for forbearance, the servicer must provide a forbearance for 
up to 180 days with no additional documentation required other than 
the borrower's attestation to a financial hardship caused by the 
COVID-19 emergency and with no fees, penalties, or interest (beyond 
the amounts scheduled or calculated as if the borrower made all 
contractual payments on time and in full under the terms of the 
mortgage contract) charged to the borrower in connection with the 
forbearance. The servicer must extend the forbearance for up to an 
additional 180 days at the request of the borrower, provided that 
the request for an extension is made during the covered period. Note 
that the borrower may request that either the initial or extended 
forbearance period be less than 180 days. See CARES Act section 
4022(b) and (c)(1).
    \22\ Such programs may be based on servicers' own programs or 
policy initiative or may be required by State or local laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 3, 2020, the Bureau, the Board of Governors of the Federal 
Reserve System (the Board), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 
(FDIC), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Office of 
the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the State Banking Regulators 
issued a joint statement (Joint Statement) recognizing the serious 
impact the COVID-19 emergency was having on consumers and on the 
operations of mortgage servicers.\23\ The Joint

[[Page 39058]]

Statement informed servicers of the agencies' flexible supervisory and 
enforcement approach during the emergency regarding certain consumer 
communications required by Regulation X, and provided guidance on 
servicers' compliance with Regulation X when offering CARES Act 
forbearances and other payment forbearance programs during the COVID-19 
emergency.\24\ The Joint Statement explained that, when a borrower 
requests a CARES Act forbearance and affirms that the borrower is 
experiencing a financial hardship during the COVID-emergency, it 
constitutes an incomplete loss mitigation application for purposes of 
Regulation X.\25\ Although receipt of an incomplete application 
generally triggers a servicer's obligations under Sec.  1024.41, the 
Joint Statement also provided that a CARES Act forbearance qualifies as 
a short-term payment forbearance program \26\ under Regulation X, so 
certain loss mitigation requirements under Regulation X do not 
apply.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Joint Statement on Supervisory and Enforcement Practices 
Regarding the Mortgage Servicing Rules in Response to the COVID-19 
Emergency and the CARES Act (Apr. 3, 2020), https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_interagency-statement_mortgage-servicing-rules-covid-19.pdf. On the same day, 
the Bureau issued additional compliance guidance to provide mortgage 
servicers with enhanced clarity about existing flexibility in the 
Bureau's mortgage servicing rules that they may use to help 
consumers during the COVID-19 emergency. Bureau of Consumer Fin. 
Prot., Bureau's Mortgage Servicing Rules FAQs related to the COVID-
19 Emergency, https://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/documents/cfpb_mortgage-servicing-rules-covid-19_faqs.pdf.
    \24\ Joint Statement, supra note 23.
    \25\ Id. The Joint Statement also explained that servicers may 
provide multiple sequential short-term payment forbearance programs 
under the Regulation X mortgage servicing rules.
    \26\ Comment 41(c)(2)(iii)-1 explains that a short-term payment 
forbearance program is a loss mitigation option pursuant to which a 
servicer allows a borrower to forgo making certain payments or 
portions of payments for a period of time. A short-term payment 
forbearance program for purposes of Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(iii) allows 
the forbearance of payments due over periods of no more than six 
months. Such a program would be short-term regardless of the amount 
of time a servicer allows the borrower to make up the missing 
payments.
    \27\ Joint Statement, supra note 23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By early June 2020, as a result of the CARES Act and other similar 
forbearance programs made available by owners or investors of mortgage 
loans, as many as 4.3 million mortgage borrowers (or 8.55 percent of 
mortgage borrowers) nationwide were in forbearance programs.\28\ After 
reaching a historic low in January of 2020 (just above 3 percent), the 
mortgage delinquency rate (which includes loans in forbearance) had 
more than doubled by early June and was at its highest level since 
2013. The delinquency rate was 3.1 percentage points higher in April 
than in March--a monthly increase three times the previous record set 
in November of 2008 during the great recession.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, Share of Mortgage Loans in 
Forbearance Increases to 8.55%, https://www.mba.org/2020-press-releases/june/share-of-mortgage-loans-in-forbearance-increases-to-855.
    \29\ Black Knight Fin. Servs., Mortgage Monitor (Apr. 2020), 
https://www.bls.gov/ces/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. COVID-19 Emergency: Post-Forbearance Options and Post-Delinquency 
Options

    The CARES Act does not specify how borrowers receiving CARES Act 
forbearances must repay the forborne payments. While there are good 
reasons for this, it creates uncertainty for stakeholders as to how 
borrowers must repay these amounts when CARES Act forbearances expire. 
As many initial forbearance periods were set at 90 days, many of them 
will expire in June or July 2020.
    The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), Federal 
Home Loan Mortgage Company (Freddie Mac), FHA, and other owners or 
insurers of mortgage loans have announced programs to assist borrowers 
in repayment of the forborne amounts.\30\ On May 13, 2020, FHFA 
announced that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would make a payment deferral 
program available to borrowers in a COVID-19 forbearance plan (FHFA 
COVID-19 payment deferral) and to borrowers who have experienced a 
financial hardship resulting from COVID-19 that has affected their 
ability to make their full monthly payment.\31\ FHFA indicated that 
these programs will be available to borrowers who are able to return to 
making their normal monthly mortgage payment.\32\ According to FHFA, 
these programs take the missed mortgage payments and make them a 
payment due at the sale of the home, refinancing of the mortgage loan, 
or the end of the loan.\33\ Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have established 
streamlined application procedures for these programs that permit 
servicers to offer an FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral without collecting 
Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's ``complete Borrower Response Package.'' 
\34\ Rather, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac permit servicers to offer FHFA 
COVID-19 payment deferrals to any borrowers who meet certain criteria 
if the borrower indicates to the servicer that (1) the borrower can 
afford to resume their normal monthly payments due before the 
forbearance and (2) the borrower cannot afford full reinstatement or a 
repayment plan to bring their mortgage loan current when they exit 
forbearance.\35\ Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac prohibit servicers from 
charging borrowers who accept an FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral 
administrative fees, and direct servicers to waive all late charges, 
penalties, stop payment fees, or similar charges upon completing a 
COVID-19 payment deferral.\36\ This program takes effect on July 1, 
2020.\37\ Other mortgage investors and insurers have also announced 
similar loss mitigation options.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ FHFA, FHFA Announces Payment Deferral as New Repayment 
Option for Homeowners in COVID-19 Forbearance Plans (May 13, 2020), 
https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/FHFA-Announces-Payment-Deferral-as-New-Repayment-Option-for-Homeowners-in-COVID-19-Forbearance-Plans.aspx; HUD Mortgagee Letter 2020-06, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/20-06hsngml.pdf.
    \31\ FHFA, supra note 30.
    \32\ Id.
    \33\ Id. While initial forbearance under the CARES Act and 
similar programs probably constitute short-term payment forbearance 
programs under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(iii), the anticipated repayments 
arrangements may not constitute short-term repayment plans under 
that section. See also Joint Statement, supra note 23.
    \34\ See Fannie Mae Lender Letter 2020-07, https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/media/22916/display; Freddie Mac Bulletin 
2020-15, https://guide.freddiemac.com/app/guide/bulletin/2020-15?_ga=2.76149522.621170394.1590694543-1945440177.1590694543.
    \35\ See id.
    \36\ See id.
    \37\ See id.
    \38\ HUD Mortgagee Letter 2020-06, supra note 30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After FHFA announced these deferral programs, industry stakeholders 
and consumer advocates raised concerns about whether servicers could 
offer an FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral using the streamlined 
application procedures described above without violating Regulation X's 
general prohibition of offering a loss mitigation option based on an 
evaluation of an incomplete application.\39\ The Bureau has evaluated 
the interaction between the FHFA payment deferral procedures and 
Regulation X, and engaged in informal outreach with FHFA, mortgage 
servicers, trade associations, consumer advocacy groups, and others. 
Industry stakeholders and consumer advocates urged the Bureau to take 
steps to ensure that servicers would not be in violation of Regulation 
X if they were to use the streamlined procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ See, e.g., JDSupra, Can Mortgage Servicers Legally Offer 
the GSEs' COVID deferral options? (May 14, 2020), https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/can-mortgage-servicers-legally-offer-42513/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau supports the goal of the FHFA's COVID-19 payment 
deferral program and certain other similar programs designed to assist 
borrowers experiencing financial hardships due, directly or indirectly, 
to the COVID-19 emergency. Through these programs, eligible borrowers 
can eliminate the immediate potential risk of losing their homes, 
resume repaying the mortgage loan with no delinquency and no additional 
fees or interest, and better plan how eventually to repay the

[[Page 39059]]

forborne amount that servicers have deferred. In addition, the 
streamlined application procedures offered by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, 
and others may help ensure that servicers have sufficient resources to 
address the unusually large number of borrowers who will be exiting 
CARES Act or similar forbearances and may be seeking assistance in the 
coming months. There are circumstances where Regulation X may require a 
servicer to collect a complete application from a borrower before 
offering this type of program. However, that result may not serve the 
particular needs of borrowers and servicers during the COVID-19 
emergency.
    For these and the reasons discussed below, the Bureau is amending 
Regulation X to specify that servicers may offer loss mitigation 
options that meet certain criteria based on the evaluation of an 
incomplete application, and that servicers need not comply with certain 
other Regulation X requirements once the borrower accepts that option. 
These criteria are intended to align with the criteria outlined in 
FHFA's COVID-19 payment deferral and other comparable programs, such as 
FHA's COVID-19 partial claim.
    The Bureau believes that this flexibility is appropriate during the 
COVID-19 emergency, which presents extraordinary circumstances. The 
Bureau will evaluate comments received under the interim final rule to 
determine whether it is appropriate to revise the amendments. The 
Bureau will also continue to monitor the market to assess consumers' 
experiences under these programs and the interim rule.
    As part of this rulemaking, the Bureau consulted with FHFA, the 
Board, FDIC, NCUA, OCC, and the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development.

III. Legal Authority

    The Bureau is issuing this interim final rule pursuant to its 
authority under RESPA and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act),\40\ including the authorities 
discussed below. This interim final rule amends a provision previously 
adopted by the Bureau in the 2016 Mortgage Servicing Final Rule.\41\ In 
doing so, the Bureau relied on one or more of the authorities discussed 
below, as well as other authority. The Bureau is issuing this interim 
final rule in reliance on the same authority and for the same reasons 
relied on in adopting the relevant provisions of the 2013 Mortgage 
Servicing Final Rule,\42\ as discussed in detail in the Legal Authority 
and Section-by-Section Analysis of the 2013 Mortgage Servicing Final 
Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
    \41\ 81 FR 72160 (Oct. 19, 2016).
    \42\ 78 FR 10695 (Feb. 14, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Respa

    Section 19(a) of RESPA, 12 U.S.C. 2617(a), authorizes the Bureau to 
prescribe such rules and regulations, to make such interpretations, and 
to grant such reasonable exemptions for classes of transactions, as may 
be necessary to achieve the purposes of RESPA, which include its 
consumer protection purposes. In addition, section 6(j)(3) of RESPA, 12 
U.S.C. 2605(j)(3), authorizes the Bureau to establish any requirements 
necessary to carry out section 6 of RESPA, section 6(k)(1)(E) of RESPA, 
and 12 U.S.C. 2605(k)(1)(E), and authorizes the Bureau to prescribe 
regulations that are appropriate to carry out RESPA's consumer 
protection purposes. The consumer protection purposes of RESPA include 
ensuring that servicers respond to borrower requests and complaints in 
a timely manner and maintain and provide accurate information, helping 
borrowers avoid unwarranted or unnecessary costs and fees and 
facilitating review for foreclosure avoidance options. The amendments 
to Regulation X in this interim final rule are intended to achieve some 
or all these purposes.

B. Dodd-Frank Act

    Section 1022(b)(1) of the Dodd-Frank Act, 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(1), 
authorizes the Bureau to prescribe rules ``as may be necessary or 
appropriate to enable the Bureau to administer and carry out the 
purposes and objectives of the Federal consumer financial laws, and to 
prevent evasions thereof.'' RESPA is a Federal consumer financial law.

IV. Administrative Procedure Act

    Under the Administrative Procedure Act,\43\ notice and opportunity 
for public comment are not required if the Bureau for good cause finds 
that notice and public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or 
contrary to the public interest.\44\ Similarly, publication of this 
interim final rule at least 30 days before its effective date is not 
required where the Bureau has identified good cause for a different 
effective date.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., 701 et seq.
    \44\ 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).
    \45\ 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau finds that prior notice and public comment are 
impracticable because there is insufficient time to solicit comment and 
finalize amendments between the FHFA's announcement of its COVID-19 
payment deferral program on May 13, 2020, and its effective date of 
July 1, 2020. As discussed more fully in part II, the economic effects 
of the COVID-19 emergency have resulted quickly in major challenges in 
the mortgage market. Congress enacted the CARES Act in late March, 
making forbearances available to many borrowers with federally backed 
mortgages, which account for approximately 80 percent of the mortgage 
market.
    Because the CARES Act does not specify how borrowers provided CARES 
Act forbearances will repay the forborne payments, Fannie Mae, Freddie 
Mac, FHA, and other owners or insurers of mortgage loans worked quickly 
after they placed borrowers in these forbearances to devise loss 
mitigation options for borrowers who could not afford to repay the 
forborne amounts in a lump sum at the conclusion of the forbearance 
period. FHFA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac announced a COVID-19 post-
forbearance program, the COVID-19 payment deferral, on May 13, 
2020.\46\ These programs take effect on July 1, 2020, and, because 
significant numbers of borrowers entered 90-day forbearances in late 
March and early April, this coincides with when many borrowers' 
forbearance periods will end. Thus, starting on July 1, 2020--absent 
immediate action by the Bureau--servicers would have to reconcile 
FHFA's COVID-19 payment deferral programs with the anti-evasion 
requirement in the servicing rules. As a practical matter, servicers 
would not be able to offer the payment deferral to some borrowers 
without first having them complete their loss mitigation applications, 
a step that would delay or obstruct relief to borrowers and frustrate 
the purpose and immediate need for the program.\47\ It is critical that 
the Bureau's temporary revision to Regulation X be in effect when these 
forbearance programs take effect to ensure that borrowers and

[[Page 39060]]

mortgage servicers can take advantage of these programs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ Borrowers who are not exiting forbearance may be also be 
eligible for this program if their mortgage loan became delinquent 
resulting from a financial hardship due, directly or indirectly, to 
the COVID-19 emergency. Due to the rising delinquency rate discussed 
in part I, significant numbers of borrowers who are not exiting 
forbearance could be eligible.
    \47\ As noted above, in the short period between the FHFA's 
announcement of its program and the issuance of this rule, the 
Bureau has consulted with stakeholders from industry, consumer 
groups, and regulators regarding the interaction between the FHFA's 
program and the servicing rules. As also noted above, industry 
stakeholders and consumer advocates urged the Bureau to take steps 
to ensure that servicers would not be in violation of Regulation X 
if they were to use the streamlined procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, prior public comment is impractical because there is 
insufficient time to solicit comment and finalize amendments before 
FHFA's COVID-19 payment deferral programs take effect on July 1, 2020.
    For similar reasons, the Bureau also finds that delaying this 
rulemaking to allow for prior public comment would be contrary to the 
public interest, because the amendments are necessary to avoid the harm 
to borrowers and to the housing market that would result if the 
amendments did not take effect on July 1, 2020. As discussed above in 
part II, the Bureau believes that the FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral 
program and other comparable programs, described more fully in part V, 
will benefit both borrowers and servicers during the current COVID-19 
emergency. These programs will help eligible borrowers avoid 
foreclosure by quickly entering an agreement regarding repayment of 
their forborne payments. Absent these streamlined procedures, servicers 
likely would require borrowers to submit a complete loss mitigation 
application before servicers would consider them for these programs. 
This could result in significant delays before borrowers can be offered 
the payment deferral program. In some cases, borrowers might not 
complete a loss mitigation application, which could prolong their 
delinquency, increase their costs, and put them at imminent risk of 
foreclosure. Given the large number of mortgage borrowers currently in 
forbearance or experiencing a delinquency related to the COVID-19 
emergency, even a small fraction of those borrowers experiencing 
foreclosure could translate to large aggregate consequences. For 
instance, as noted above, approximately four million borrowers have 
entered forbearance since March 2020. Even if only one-tenth of 1 
percent of these borrowers would experience foreclosure absent a 
deferral, that would translate to thousands of additional foreclosures. 
Thus, avoiding foreclosures may help prevent significant consequences 
for the housing market and imposing costs both on borrowers and 
servicers.
    In addition, the streamlined procedures permitted for FHFA's COVID-
19 payment deferral program would minimize the burden on servicers by 
allowing them to offer the payment deferral program without obtaining 
and processing a complete application from the borrower. This is 
especially important during the COVID-19 emergency because servicers 
will be transitioning many borrowers from forbearances to longer term 
solutions at the same time, potentially overwhelming servicers' systems 
and delaying providing relief to borrowers. Indeed, the Bureau 
understands that servicers have already begun receiving abnormally high 
call volumes, beginning in March 2020.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \48\ See, Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, MBA Survey Shows Spike in 
Loans in Forbearance and Servicer Call Volume, https://www.mba.org/2020-press-releases/april/mba-survey-shows-spike-in-loans-in-forbearance-servicer-call-volume.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For these same reasons, the Bureau also finds that there is good 
cause for this interim final rule to be effective less than 30 days 
after publication, to ensure that these amendments are in effect by the 
July 1, 2020 effective date of the FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral, to 
avoid harm to borrowers and to the housing market.

V. Section-by-Section Analysis

Section 1024.41 Loss Mitigation Procedures
41(c) Evaluation of loss mitigation applications
41(c)(2) Incomplete loss mitigation application evaluation
41(c)(2)(i) In general

    Section 1024.41(c)(2)(i) states that, in general, servicers shall 
not evade the requirement to evaluate a complete loss mitigation 
application for all loss mitigation options available to the borrower 
by making an offer based upon an incomplete application.\49\ Currently, 
the provision points to two paragraphs providing exceptions to the 
anti-evasion requirement, Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(ii) and (iii). In this 
interim final rule, the Bureau is adding a temporary exception under 
new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v). As described in the section-by-section 
analysis of Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v), the new exception applies to 
certain loss mitigation options that permit borrowers to delay 
repayment of forborne or delinquent amounts accrued due to the COVID-19 
emergency. The Bureau is amending Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(i) to include a 
reference to the new exception in paragraph (c)(2)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \49\ Small servicers, as defined in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 
1026.41, are not subject to this requirement. 12 CFR 1024.30(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

41(c)(2)(v) Certain COVID-19-Related Loss Mitigation Options
    In general, Sec.  1024.41 requires servicers to evaluate a complete 
loss mitigation application for all loss mitigation options available 
to the borrower.\50\ In this interim final rule, the Bureau is adding a 
temporary exception to this requirement under new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v) for certain loss mitigation options that permit 
borrowers to delay repayment of forborne or delinquent amounts accrued 
during a COVID-19-related forbearance. As described in the respective 
section-by-section analyses, new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) sets forth 
the minimum specific criteria that the loss mitigation option must meet 
for the new exception to apply, and new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(B) 
offers servicers relief from certain regulatory requirements when a 
borrower accepts a loss mitigation option under the new exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in part II, FHFA, FHA, and others have recently 
announced loss mitigation options to assist borrowers experiencing 
hardships related to the COVID-19 emergency in repaying amounts that 
accrued through forbearance or delinquency.\51\ In general, these 
programs permit borrowers who can resume their normal periodic payments 
to move the forborne or delinquent payments to the end of the mortgage 
loan and cure any preexisting delinquency. Under those programs, the 
deferred amounts must not accrue interest, servicers may not charge any 
fee in connection with the loss mitigation option and must waive 
various preexisting fees, if applicable, and servicers are permitted to 
offer the deferral programs to borrowers based on streamlined 
application procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \51\ FHFA, supra note 30; HUD Mortgagee Letter 2020-06, supra 
note 30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau believes that the FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral and 
certain similar programs would provide benefits both to borrowers and 
servicers during the COVID-19 emergency. Through these programs, 
borrowers who can resume their normal periodic payments but who cannot 
afford to repay the forborne or delinquent amounts in the short-term 
should be able to eliminate the immediate potential risk of losing 
their homes to foreclosure, resume repaying the mortgage loan with no 
delinquency and no additional fees or interest, and better plan how 
eventually to repay the forborne or delinquent amount that has been 
deferred.
    In addition, the streamlined application procedures authorized by 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should help ensure that servicers have 
sufficient resources to address requests from the unusually large 
number of borrowers who will be seeking assistance from them in the 
coming months as many CARES Act forbearances end. And borrowers dealing 
with the social and economic effects of COVID-19 may be less likely

[[Page 39061]]

than they would be under normal circumstances to take the steps 
necessary to complete a loss mitigation application to receive a full 
evaluation. This could prolong their delinquencies and put them at risk 
for foreclosure. Moreover, by allowing servicers to assist borrowers 
eligible for deferrals more efficiently, servicers will have more 
resources to assist borrowers who are unable to resume making their 
normal periodic payment, and are therefore ineligible for a FHFA COVID-
19 payment deferral, submit a complete loss mitigation application for 
evaluation.
    The Bureau acknowledges that borrowers accepting a loss mitigation 
offer under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) will not receive protections 
under Sec.  1024.41 that are critical in other circumstances. As the 
Bureau explained in the 2013 Mortgage Servicing Final Rule, the general 
prohibition against evaluating a borrower for all available loss 
mitigation options based on a single, complete application ensures that 
borrowers have a full understanding of their loss mitigation options 
when deciding on a program.\52\ It also makes the loss mitigation 
application process more efficient by eliminating multiple, sequential 
evaluations that are sometimes based on similar application 
information,\53\ with the resulting efficiency often saving borrowers 
time and resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 78 FR at 10828.
    \53\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nonetheless, the Bureau believes that the protections set forth in 
new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) and (B), described below, provide 
sufficient safeguards for borrowers in the narrow context of the COVID-
19 emergency. The Bureau solicits comment on all aspects of the new 
exception.
41(c)(2)(v)(A)
    New Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) permits servicers to offer a loss 
mitigation option based upon an evaluation of an incomplete 
application, as long as the loss mitigation option meets the criteria 
set forth in Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) through (3). Under new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1), the loss mitigation option must permit the 
borrower to delay paying covered amounts until the mortgage loan is 
refinanced, the mortgaged property is sold, the term of the mortgage 
loan ends, or, for a mortgage insured by FHA, the mortgage insurance 
terminates. New Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) defines ``covered 
amounts'' for these purposes to include, without limitation, all 
principal and interest payments forborne under a payment forbearance 
program made available to borrowers experiencing a financial hardship 
due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency,\54\ including a 
payment forbearance program made pursuant to the CARES Act. ``Covered 
amounts'' under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) also includes, without 
limitation, all other principal and interest payments that are due and 
unpaid by a borrower experiencing a similar financial hardship. And 
``the term of the mortgage loan'' under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) 
means the loan term according to the obligation between the parties in 
effect when the borrower is offered the loss mitigation option under 
the new exception.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \54\ New Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) states that ``COVID-19 
emergency'' has the same meaning as under CARES Act section 
4022(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(2), any amounts that the 
borrower may delay paying as described in paragraph (c)(v)(2)(A)(1) 
must not accrue interest; the servicer must not charge any fee in 
connection with the loss mitigation option; and the servicer must waive 
all existing late charges, penalties, stop payment fees, or similar 
charges promptly upon the borrower's acceptance of the loss mitigation 
option. And, under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(3), the borrower's 
acceptance of the offer must end any preexisting delinquency.
    The criteria in Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) through (3) provide 
borrowers with safeguards to ensure that borrowers are sufficiently 
protected when receiving a loss mitigation offer described in Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) without an evaluation of a complete loss mitigation 
application. First, to qualify for the exception, new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) requires that any forborne or delinquent 
principal or interest payments be moved to the end of the loan or, for 
loans that FHA insures, until the mortgage insurance terminates. This 
ensures that borrowers in forbearance programs will not face a balloon 
payment immediately after the forbearance period ends, and it will ease 
the financial strain of having to make additional periodic payments to 
catch up on a mortgage loan for delinquent borrowers who are not in 
forbearance. The alternatives could exacerbate borrowers' hardships and 
lead to foreclosure. As a result of the eligibility criteria under new 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1), many borrowers receiving a loss 
mitigation option under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) will have years to 
plan to address the deferred payments. This may be particularly 
important during the COVID-19 emergency, as many borrowers may be 
facing extended periods of economic uncertainty.
    The Bureau notes that new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) allows for 
some flexibility among loss mitigation options that may qualify for the 
exception. For example, although the loss mitigation options must defer 
all forborne or delinquent principal and interest payments under new 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1), the rule does not specify how servicers 
must treat any forborne or delinquent escrow amounts. A loss mitigation 
option would qualify for the new exception if it defers repayment of 
escrow amounts, in addition to principal and interest payments, as long 
as it otherwise satisfies new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A).
    New Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) is also flexible with respect to 
repayment requirements--it does not specify how a servicer must 
structure repayment of the deferred amounts. Requiring repayment either 
in a lump sum or over a specified period at the end of the loan term 
through additional periodic payments, among other possible approaches, 
would satisfy new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1). The Bureau notes that 
the provision specifically defines the mortgage loan term for these 
purposes to mean the loan term in effect when the borrower is offered 
the loss mitigation option. As a result, the exception under new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) is available for eligible loss mitigation options 
that would technically extend the term of the loan in accommodating 
repayment of forborne or delinquent amounts.
    The Bureau also notes that new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) 
provides a standard specific to loans insured by FHA. This is intended 
to ensure that the new exception extends to certain loss mitigation 
options available for FHA loans. The Bureau understands that FHA 
permits servicers to offer loss mitigation options that would otherwise 
satisfy the criteria of Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) based on an 
evaluation of an incomplete loss mitigation application, and that these 
options would generally provide similar benefits to borrowers and 
servicers as other loss mitigation options offered under Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A). In some circumstances, these loss mitigation 
options would require repayment when the mortgage insurance terminates. 
The FHA-specific standard in new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) ensures 
that such repayment requirements do not exclude these loss mitigation 
options from the new exception.
    Second, for the exception to apply, new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(2) requires that (1) any amounts that the borrower

[[Page 39062]]

may delay paying as part of the loss mitigation agreement do not accrue 
interest, (2) the servicer charges no fee in connection with the loss 
mitigation option, and (3) the servicer waives a variety of other fees 
promptly upon the borrower's acceptance. This requirement will prevent 
the application of standards that impose additional economic hardship 
on borrowers, better enabling the borrowers to address other financial 
needs during the COVID-19 emergency.
    Third, for the exception to apply, new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(3) 
requires that the borrower's acceptance of the offer end any 
preexisting delinquency.\55\ This ensures that borrowers who accept a 
loss mitigation option under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) do not face 
a risk of imminent foreclosure because, under existing Sec.  
1024.41(f)(1)(i), servicers are generally prohibited from making the 
first notice or filing required under applicable law to initiate the 
foreclosure process until a mortgage loan obligation is more than 120 
days delinquent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ After the borrower accepts a loss mitigation option under 
new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), if a periodic payment sufficient to 
cover principal, interest, and, if applicable, escrow becomes due 
and unpaid, a new delinquency would begin. See generally 12 CFR 
1024.31(definition of delinquency).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau understands that the FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral and 
FHA's COVID-19 partial claim, both of which are described in part II, 
satisfy the criteria in new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(1) through (3). 
These programs have included these criteria to assist borrowers in 
addressing financial hardships caused by the COVID-19 emergency, in 
part by helping to keep their mortgage loans current following the 
hardship.\56\ The Bureau notes, however, that the exception is not 
limited to those programs. Servicers may offer loss mitigation options 
under other programs, as long as the loss mitigation options meet the 
criteria described in Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \56\ Press Release, Freddie Mac Announces COVID-19 Payment 
Deferral (May 13, 2020), https://freddiemac.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/freddie-mac-announces-covid-19-payment-deferral?_ga=2.125995917.1203641316.1592241885-952089942.1591127071; see also Fannie Mae Lender Letter (LL-2020-07) 
(as updated on June 10, 2020), https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/media/22916/display; FHA Mortgagee Letter 2020-06 (Apr. 1, 2020), 
https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/20-06hsngml.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

41(c)(2)(v)(B)
    New Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(B) provides servicers relief from 
certain regulatory requirements if a borrower accepts an offer made 
pursuant to new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A). It states that, in that 
scenario, the servicer is not required to comply with Sec.  
1024.41(b)(1) or (2) with regard to any loss mitigation application the 
borrower submitted prior to the servicer's offer of the loss mitigation 
option described in new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A).
    Section 1024.41(b)(1) and (2) generally sets forth servicers' 
obligations upon first receiving a borrower's loss mitigation 
application. Section 1024.41(b)(1) generally requires a servicer to 
exercise reasonable diligence in obtaining documents and information to 
complete the loss mitigation application. Section 1024.41(b)(2) 
generally requires the servicer to review the application to assess 
completeness and provide a written notice within five days (excluding 
legal public holidays, Saturdays, and Sundays) stating, among other 
things, that the servicer has determined that the loss mitigation 
application is either complete or incomplete; the additional documents 
and information the borrower must submit to make the application 
complete, if applicable; a reasonable date by which the borrower should 
submit the additional documents and information; and a statement that 
the borrower should consider contacting servicers of any other mortgage 
loans secured by the same property to discuss available loss mitigation 
options.
    These protections are part of a regulatory regime designed to 
ensure that borrowers generally receive an evaluation for all available 
loss mitigation options based upon a single application. As explained 
in the section-by-section analysis of new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), 
this regulatory regime is intended to give borrowers information about 
their loss mitigation options when deciding on a program and make the 
application process more efficient, which can save borrowers time and 
resources.
    Notwithstanding these important benefits, however, the Bureau 
believes that, in the context of a loss mitigation offer under new 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), the protections under Sec.  1024.41(b)(1) 
and (2) introduce undue burden for both servicers and borrowers 
attempting to navigate the unusual challenges caused by the COVID-19 
emergency. Servicers are currently dealing with an abnormally high 
number of requests for loss mitigation assistance due to the pandemic. 
According to the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), between early 
March and early June 2020, approximately four million borrowers entered 
into forbearance programs.\57\ Over that period, the percentage of all 
mortgage loans in forbearance increased from 0.19 percent to 8.55 
percent.\58\ If servicers were required to exercise reasonable 
diligence to obtain a complete application for each of these borrowers 
when they exit the forbearance programs, as required under Sec.  
1024.41(b)(1), or to provide borrower-specific notifications of the 
documents and information each individual applicant must submit to 
complete the application, as required under Sec.  1024.41(b)(2), it 
would likely interfere with their ability to provide effective and 
efficient assistance. And borrowers dealing with the social and 
economic effects of the COVID-19 emergency may be less likely than 
normal to take the steps necessary to complete a loss mitigation 
application to receive a full evaluation. The Bureau notes that, if a 
borrower does wish to pursue a complete application and receive the 
full protections of Sec.  1024.41, they may do so notwithstanding new 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \57\ Mortgage Bankers Ass'n, supra note 28.
    \58\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau stresses that servicers are required to comply with 
Sec.  1024.41, including Sec.  1024.41(b)(1) and (2), if the borrower 
submits a new application after accepting a loss mitigation option 
under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A). In general, servicers are required 
to comply with Sec.  1024.41 if a borrower submits a loss mitigation 
application, unless the servicer has previously complied in connection 
with a complete application submitted by the borrower and the borrower 
has been delinquent at all times since submitting that complete 
application.\59\ If a borrower has accepted a loss mitigation option 
offered under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), neither of these elements 
will be present the first time the borrower submits a later loss 
mitigation application. The exception described under new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) is available only if the loss mitigation 
application is incomplete and, under new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A)(3), 
the borrower's acceptance of the option ends any preexisting 
delinquency of the borrower's mortgage loan account. As a result, 
servicers must comply with the requirements of Sec.  1024.41 for the 
first later application, which may occur during the same conversation 
in which the borrower accepts the offer under Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \59\ 12 CFR 1024.41(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, servicers may be required to comply with early 
intervention obligations if a borrower's mortgage loan account becomes 
delinquent after a loss mitigation option takes effect under

[[Page 39063]]

Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A).\60\ These include live contact and written 
notification obligations that, in part, require servicers to inform 
borrowers of the availability of additional loss mitigation options and 
how the borrowers can apply.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \60\ Small servicers, as defined in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 
1026.41, are not subject to these requirements. 12 CFR 
1024.30(b)(1).
    \61\ See 12 CFR 1024.39(a) and (b). Also, servicers are to have 
policies and procedures in place to advise borrowers of all of their 
loss mitigation options. 12 CFR 1024.38. During the COVID-19 
emergency, one of the loss mitigation options to be presented to 
borrowers with federally backed mortgages is their right to CARES 
Act forbearance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Bureau believes that a borrower whose mortgage loan 
account becomes delinquent following acceptance of a loss mitigation 
option under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) will have sufficient notice that 
other options may be available should the borrower wish to submit 
another application. In general, borrowers who previously received a 
forbearance will have received at least two written notifications 
earlier in the loss mitigation process, as required under Regulation X: 
(1) The written notice required under Sec.  1024.41(b)(2) when the 
borrower submits the initial application requesting forbearance, and 
(2) written notification of the terms and conditions of the forbearance 
program, required under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(iii), stating that the 
servicer offered the program based on evaluation of an incomplete 
application, that other loss mitigation options may be available, and 
that the borrower still has the option to submit a complete application 
to receive an evaluation for all available options.\62\ Additionally, 
many borrowers receiving an offer under Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) are 
likely to have received early intervention efforts by their servicers, 
including the written notice required under Regulation X stating, among 
other things, a brief description of examples of loss mitigation 
options that may be available, as well as application instructions or a 
statement informing the borrower how to obtain more information about 
loss mitigation options from the servicer.\63\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \62\ See 12 CFR 1024.41(c)(2)(iii).
    \63\ The early intervention written notice is generally required 
no later than the 45th day of a borrower's delinquency. 12 CFR 
1024.39(b). If a borrower is delinquent during a forbearance 
program, the servicer will likely be required to provide the written 
notice to the borrower.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In light of these protections, as well as the safeguards set forth 
in new Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), the Bureau believes the requirements 
of Sec.  1024.41(b)(1) and (2) would introduce burden for servicers and 
borrowers that is unnecessary in this limited context.

VI. Request for Comment

    The Bureau invites comment on this interim final rule. The Bureau 
is particularly interested in whether the amendments appropriately 
balance providing flexibility to servicers to offer relief quickly 
during the COVID-19 emergency with providing important protections for 
borrowers engaged in the loss mitigation application process, such as 
protections from foreclosure. The Bureau also seeks comment on whether 
to require written disclosures for this, or any similar exceptions that 
the Bureau may authorize in the future. The Bureau also seeks comment 
on whether the Bureau should extend the exception established in new 
Sec.  1024.41(c)(3)(v) to other post-forbearance loss mitigation 
options made available to borrowers affected by other types of 
disasters and emergencies.

VII. Effective Date

    This interim final rule is effective on July 1, 2020.

VIII. Dodd-Frank Act Section 1022(b) Analysis

    In developing this interim final rule, the Bureau has considered 
the potential benefits, costs, and impacts as required by section 
1022(b)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act.\64\ In developing this interim final 
rule, the Bureau has consulted with appropriate Federal agencies 
regarding the consistency of this final rule with prudential, market, 
or systemic objectives administered by such agencies as required by 
section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act.\65\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \64\ Specifically, section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act 
(12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A)) requires the Bureau to consider the 
potential benefits and costs of the regulation to consumers and 
covered persons, including the potential reduction of access by 
consumers to consumer financial products or services; the impact of 
the proposed rule on insured depository institutions and insured 
credit unions with $10 billion or less in total assets as described 
in section 1026 of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 5516); and the 
impact on consumers in rural areas.
    \65\ Section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. 
5512(b)(2)(B)) requires that the Bureau consult with the appropriate 
prudential regulators or other Federal agencies prior to proposing a 
rule and during the comment process regarding consistency of the 
proposed rule with prudential, market, or systemic objectives 
administered by such agencies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau considered the benefits, costs, and impacts of this 
interim final rule against a baseline in which the Bureau takes no 
action. The baseline under this approach includes the CARES Act and the 
forbearances that have already been granted under the CARES Act and 
substantially similar programs.\66\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \66\ The Bureau has discretion in any rulemaking to choose an 
appropriate scope of analysis with respect to potential benefits, 
costs, and impacts and an appropriate baseline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In considering the relevant potential benefits, costs, and impacts 
of this interim final rule, the Bureau has used feedback received to 
date and its knowledge of consumer financial markets. The discussion 
below of these potential costs, benefits, and impacts is partly 
qualitative, reflecting the specialized nature of the amendments. The 
Bureau requests comment on this discussion generally, as well as the 
submission of data or other information that could inform the Bureau's 
consideration of the potential benefits, costs, and impacts of the 
interim final rule.
    The interim final rule's provisions generally would decrease burden 
incurred by industry participants and benefit consumers by providing a 
limited exception to the general requirement under Sec.  1024.41 for 
borrowers to submit a complete loss mitigation application before 
servicers may offer any loss mitigation option based on the evaluation 
of an incomplete application. Under the interim final rule, this 
limited exception would be available for loss mitigation options that 
permit payments forborne under an eligible forbearance, as well as 
payments that are due and unpaid, related to the COVID-19 emergency to 
be deferred to the end of the mortgage loan. As is described in more 
detail below, the Bureau does not believe that these changes would 
restrict consumer access to consumer financial products and services 
relative to what would occur under the baseline.
    Exception to Regulation X anti-evasion provision allowing FHFA 
COVID-19 payment deferrals without a complete loss mitigation 
application. The interim final rule revises Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(i) and 
adds Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v) to allow servicers to offer a payment 
deferral, or a similar loss mitigation option in certain circumstances 
based on the evaluation of an incomplete loss mitigation application. 
In general, for the exception to apply, borrowers must already have 
received a forbearance or delinquency related to the COVID-19 
emergency, the forborne or delinquent payments must be deferred to the 
end of the mortgage loan without accruing interest and with a variety 
of fees waived, and the borrower's acceptance must end any preexisting 
delinquency. The Bureau understands that the FHFA COVID-19 payment 
deferral and FHA's COVID-19 partial claim satisfy the criteria, 
although the interim final rule is not limited to these programs.

[[Page 39064]]

    As noted above, Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(i), in part, prohibits evasion 
of the requirement for servicers to evaluate borrowers for all 
available loss mitigation options in a single application once they 
have received a complete application. In the 2013 Mortgage Servicing 
Final Rule, the Bureau explained its view that borrowers would benefit 
from this requirement, in part because borrowers would generally be 
better able to choose among available loss mitigation options if they 
are presented simultaneously. This interim final rule is unlikely to 
affect this benefit in most cases, given the narrow scope and 
particular circumstances of the exception. Even if a borrower may be 
interested in and eligible for another form of loss mitigation besides 
a deferral, receiving a deferral would not generally remove the 
borrower's right under Sec.  1024.41 to submit a complete loss 
mitigation application and receive an evaluation for all available 
options after the deferral is in place. Moreover, in the specific case 
of the FHFA COVID-19 payment deferral program, in practice, the 
incomplete applications that may result in deferrals will generally be 
created as a result of servicer outreach specifically for the purposes 
of granting a deferral: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have directed their 
servicers to proactively reach out to borrowers currently under a CARES 
Act forbearance and to grant deferrals to all eligible borrowers.\67\ 
Further, to be eligible for the exception under new Sec.  
1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A), a loss mitigation option must bring the loan 
current. In most cases, borrowers must be more than 120 days delinquent 
before a servicer may make the first notice or filing required under 
applicable law to initiate foreclosure proceedings.\68\ Thus, if a 
borrower wishes to pursue another loss mitigation option after 
accepting the deferral, the borrower will still have a considerable 
amount of time to complete a loss mitigation application before they 
would be at risk for foreclosure. In summary, in these specific 
circumstances, the Bureau believes that allowing servicers to grant 
deferrals without a complete loss mitigation application will not 
materially affect borrowers' ability to choose among available loss 
mitigation options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \67\ The Bureau notes as well that one of the eligibility 
criteria for the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac programs is that the 
borrower states that they are able to resume payments under the 
original terms of the mortgage. The Bureau expects that borrowers in 
those circumstances generally will not require other types of loss 
mitigation.
    \68\ 12 CFR 1024.41(f)(1)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Borrowers will likely benefit from the new exception to the extent 
that they are more able to receive a payment deferral without having to 
submit a complete loss mitigation application. In most cases, this will 
result in a reduction in the time necessary to gather required 
documents and information. In some cases, if borrowers would not 
otherwise complete a loss mitigation application and could not 
otherwise obtain relief with respect to the forborne or delinquent 
payments, the interim final rule will enable borrowers to obtain the 
deferral in the first place. Without a deferral, borrowers may need to 
repay the forborne or delinquent payments immediately. Borrowers who 
can do so would use savings, sell assets, or incur additional debt. 
Borrowers who cannot immediately repay the forborne or delinquency 
balances could suffer foreclosure or other negative consequences. Thus, 
for borrowers who obtain a deferral under the new exception, the 
benefit of the provision is, at a minimum, the interest on savings or 
asset appreciation that need not be foregone or the borrowing costs 
that need not be incurred. For other borrowers, the benefit of the 
provision is the value of preventing delinquency fees and foreclosure.
    The Bureau does not have data available to predict what fraction of 
borrowers currently under a forbearance or delinquency related to the 
COVID-19 emergency would not be able to complete a loss mitigation 
application if required to complete the application in order to receive 
a deferral offer. However, the Bureau believes that in the present 
circumstances that percentage could be substantial due to limitations 
in servicer capacity. As discussed above, data from the MBA indicates 
that as of June 7, 2020, roughly 8.55 percent of all mortgages were 
currently in forbearance, a total of about 4.3 million loans, almost 
all of which entered forbearance following the passage of the CARES Act 
and thus could exit forbearance around the same time. Processing 
complete loss mitigation applications for all these borrowers in a 
short period of time would likely strain many servicers' resources. 
This might lead to more borrowers who have incomplete applications that 
never reach completion and who fail to get a deferral under the 
baseline compared to what might occur under standard market conditions. 
The Bureau also does not have data available to predict how many 
borrowers currently in a forbearance or a delinquency related to the 
COVID-19 emergency would experience foreclosure but for a payment 
deferral offered under the exception in this interim final rule.
    Covered persons will benefit from the reduction in burden from the 
requirement to process complete loss mitigation applications for 
deferrals described in Sec.  1024.41(c)(2)(v)(A) that are eligible for 
the exception. Given the number of loans that are currently in a 
forbearance due to the COVID-19 emergency, this benefit could be 
substantial. This may be particularly true for loans serviced on behalf 
of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As part of the FHFA COVID-19 payment 
deferral program, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are requiring servicers of 
their loans to actively attempt to contact consumers currently in a 
CARES Act forbearance in order to verify eligibility for a 
deferral.\69\ Thus, with or without the interim final rule, servicers 
of loans that are owned, insured, or guaranteed by Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac are required to attempt to contact borrowers currently in a 
CARES Act forbearance. Without the interim final rule, in each case, 
the servicers would further need to collect documentation needed for a 
complete loss mitigation application, and to process the complete 
application before a deferral could be offered. Multiplied by millions 
of such loans in forbearance, these costs could be substantial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \69\ Press Release, Freddie Mac Announces COVID019 Payment 
Deferral (May 13, 2020), https://freddiemac.gcs-web.com/news-releases/news-release-details/freddie-mac-announces-covid-19-payment-deferral?_ga=2.125995917.1203641316.1592241885-952089942.1591127071; see also Fannie Mae Lender Letter (LL-2020-07) 
(as updated on June 10, 2020), https://singlefamily.fanniemae.com/media/22916/display; FHA Mortgagee Letter 2020-06 (Apr. 1, 2020), 
https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/20-06hsngml.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Potential specific impacts of the interim final rule. The Bureau 
believes that a large fraction of depository institutions and credit 
unions with $10 billion or less in total assets that are engaged in 
servicing mortgage loans qualify as ``small servicers'' for purposes of 
the mortgage servicing rules because they service 5,000 or fewer loans, 
all of which they or an affiliate own or originated. Small servicers 
are not subject to the relevant portions of Regulation X, Sec.  
1024.41, and so are not affected by the amendments in this interim 
final rule.
    With respect to servicers that are not small servicers as defined 
in Sec.  1026.41(e)(4), the Bureau believes that the consideration of 
benefits and costs of covered persons presented above provides a 
largely accurate analysis of the impacts of the final rule on

[[Page 39065]]

depository institutions and credit unions with $10 billion or less in 
total assets that are engaged in servicing mortgage loans.
    The Bureau has no reason to believe that the additional flexibility 
offered to covered persons by this interim final rule would 
differentially affect consumers in rural areas. The Bureau requests 
comment regarding the impact of the amended provisions on consumers in 
rural areas and how those impacts may differ from those experienced by 
consumers generally.

IX. Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) \70\ does not apply to a 
rulemaking where general notice of proposed rulemaking is not 
required.\71\ As noted previously, the Bureau has determined that it is 
unnecessary to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for this 
interim final rule. Accordingly, the RFA's requirements relating to an 
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis do not apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \70\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \71\ 5 U.S.C. 603(a), 604(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

X. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Bureau has determined that the interim final rule does not 
impose any new or revise any existing recordkeeping, reporting, or 
disclosure requirements on covered entities or members of the public 
that would be collections of information requiring approval by the 
Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act.\72\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \72\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

XI. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act,\73\ the Bureau will 
submit a report containing this rule and other required information to 
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller 
General of the United States prior to the rule's published effective 
date. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has designated 
this rule as a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). As 
discussed in part IV, the Bureau finds that there is good cause for the 
rule to take effect without prior notice and comment. Accordingly, this 
rule may take effect at such time as the Bureau determines. 5 U.S.C. 
808(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \73\ 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

XII. Signing Authority

    The Director of the Bureau, having reviewed and approved this 
document, is delegating the authority to electronically sign this 
document to Laura Galban, a Bureau Federal Register Liaison, for 
purposes of publication in the Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1024

    Banking, Banks, Condominiums, Consumer protection, Credit unions, 
Housing, Insurance, Mortgage servicing, Mortgagees, Mortgages, National 
banks, Savings associations, State member banks.

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons set forth above, the Bureau amends Regulation X, 12 
CFR part 1024, as set forth below:

PART 1024--REAL ESTATE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES ACT (REGULATION X)

0
1. The authority citation for part 1024 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 2603-2605, 2607, 2609, 2617, 5512, 5532, 
5581.

Subpart C--Mortgage Servicing

0
2. Section 1024.41 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(2)(i) and 
adding paragraph (c)(2)(v) to read as follows:


Sec.  1024.41  Loss mitigation procedures.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) Incomplete loss mitigation application evaluation--(i) In 
general. Except as set forth in paragraphs (c)(2)(ii), (iii), and (v) 
of this section, a servicer shall not evade the requirement to evaluate 
a complete loss mitigation application for all loss mitigation options 
available to the borrower by offering a loss mitigation option based 
upon an evaluation of any information provided by a borrower in 
connection with an incomplete loss mitigation application.
* * * * *
    (v) Certain COVID-19-related loss mitigation options. (A) 
Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(2)(i) of this section, a servicer may 
offer a borrower a loss mitigation option based upon evaluation of an 
incomplete application, provided that all of the following criteria are 
met:
    (1) The loss mitigation option permits the borrower to delay paying 
covered amounts until the mortgage loan is refinanced, the mortgaged 
property is sold, the term of the mortgage loan ends, or, for a 
mortgage loan insured by the Federal Housing Administration, the 
mortgage insurance terminates. For purposes of this paragraph 
(c)(2)(v)(A)(1), ``covered amounts'' includes, without limitation, all 
principal and interest payments forborne under a payment forbearance 
program made available to borrowers experiencing a financial hardship 
due, directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency, including a 
payment forbearance program made pursuant to the Coronavirus Economic 
Stabilization Act, section 4022 (15 U.S.C. 9056); it also includes, 
without limitation, all other principal and interest payments that are 
due and unpaid by a borrower experiencing financial hardship due, 
directly or indirectly, to the COVID-19 emergency. For purposes of this 
paragraph (c)(2)(v)(A)(1), ``COVID-19 emergency'' has the same meaning 
as under the Coronavirus Economic Stabilization Act, section 4022(a)(1) 
(15 U.S.C. 9056(a)(1)). For purposes of this paragraph (c)(2)(v)(A)(1), 
``the term of the mortgage loan'' means the term of the mortgage loan 
according to the obligation between the parties in effect when the 
borrower is offered the loss mitigation option.
    (2) Any amounts that the borrower may delay paying as described in 
paragraph (c)(2)(v)(A)(1) of this section do not accrue interest; the 
servicer does not charge any fee in connection with the loss mitigation 
option; and the servicer waives all existing late charges, penalties, 
stop payment fees, or similar charges promptly upon the borrower's 
acceptance of the loss mitigation option.
    (3) The borrower's acceptance of an offer made pursuant to 
paragraph (c)(2)(v)(A) of this section ends any pre-existing 
delinquency on the mortgage loan.
    (B) Once the borrower accepts an offer made pursuant to paragraph 
(c)(2)(v)(A) of this section, the servicer is not required to comply 
with paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section with regard to any loss 
mitigation application the borrower submitted prior to the servicer's 
offer of the loss mitigation option described in paragraph (c)(2)(v)(A) 
of this section.
* * * * *

    Dated: June 23, 2020.
Laura Galban,
Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2020-13853 Filed 6-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P