[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 85 (Friday, May 1, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25303-25307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08123]
[[Page 25303]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0669, FRL-10007-28-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Washington; Wallula Second 10-Year Maintenance
Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a plan
for the Wallula area in Washington State that addresses the second 10-
year maintenance period for particulate matter with an aerodynamic
diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(PM10). This plan relies upon the control measures contained
in the first 10-year maintenance plan, with revisions to reflect
updated permits and agreements, also approved in this action.
Concurrently, we are taking final agency action on high wind and
wildfire exceptional events associated with the Wallula area.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0669. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it means the EPA.
I. Background
The Wallula area was designated nonattainment for the 24-hour
PM10 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and
classified as a Moderate area upon enactment of the Clean Air Act
Amendments of 1990 (56 FR 56694, November 6, 1991). The Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted a Moderate area attainment
plan for the Wallula area on November 13, 1991, and a Serious area plan
on November 30, 2004. The EPA acted on the plans on January 27, 1997
and May 2, 2005, respectively (62 FR 3800 and 83 FR 22597). During the
planning process, the EPA determined that the area attained the
PM10 NAAQS based on 1999 through 2001 air quality monitoring
data (67 FR 64815, October 22, 2002).
The PM10 emissions inventory for the Wallula area has
remained relatively consistent over time, with agricultural dust and
point sources contributing the bulk of anthropogenic impact within the
area. As discussed in more detail in the proposal and later in this
preamble, high wind events carrying dust from both within and outside
the Wallula area play a significant role on days that exceed the
PM10 NAAQS. On-road motor vehicles make up only
approximately 1% of the overall inventory. The transportation
conformity rule at 40 CFR 93.109(f) allows areas to forego
establishment of motor vehicle emissions budgets where it is
demonstrated that the regional motor vehicle emissions for a particular
pollutant or precursor are an insignificant contributor to the air
quality problem in an area. The EPA's rationale for providing for
insignificance determinations may be found in the July 1, 2004,
revision to the Transportation Conformity Rule (69 FR 40004). As
provided in 40 CFR 93.109(f), the general criteria for insignificance
determinations are based on a number of factors, including the
percentage of motor vehicle emissions in the context of the total SIP
inventory; the current state of air quality as determined by monitoring
data for the relevant NAAQS; the absence of SIP motor vehicle control
measures; and the historical trends and future projections of the
growth of motor vehicle emissions in the area. Using these regulatory
criteria, the EPA granted Washington's request for an exemption from
conducting a regional emissions analysis for transportation conformity
because motor vehicles were an insignificant source of PM10
emissions (70 FR 5085, 5092, February 1, 2005 (proposed action); 70 FR
22597, May 2, 2005 (final action)).
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), specific exceedances due to natural
events, such as unusually high winds, may be discounted or excluded
entirely from decisions regarding an area's air quality status in
appropriate circumstances. From 1996 to 2007, EPA's Natural Events
Policy \1\ governed the process by which states could request exclusion
of monitored values that exceeded the NAAQS due to ``natural events''
in making attainment determinations. As part of the EPA's finding of
attainment for the Wallula area in 2002, the EPA determined that all
exceedances that occurred in 1999 through 2001 qualified as high wind
natural events under the EPA's Natural Events Policy. (67 FR 64815,
October 22, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum from the EPA's Assistant Administrator for
Air and Radiation to EPA Regional Air Directors entitled ``Areas
Affected by Natural Events,'' dated May 30, 1996 (EPA's Natural
Events Policy), in effect at that time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequently, Ecology conducted a final review of high wind natural
events for the area. Ecology found that there had been nine reported
PM10 exceedances in the Wallula area since January 1, 1995,
and all but one was reasonably attributed to dust raised by unusually
high winds.\2\ On March 29, 2005, Ecology submitted the state's plan to
maintain the PM10 NAAQS in the Wallula area for 10 years, in
accordance with section 175A of the CAA, and requested that the EPA
redesignate the Wallula area to attainment for the PM10
NAAQS. The EPA approved Ecology's submitted maintenance plan and
redesignation request on August 26, 2005 (70 FR 50212).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The one exceedance not attributed to high winds occurred on
July 3, 1997, and was attributed to an unusual and nonrecurring
activity involving the transport of multiple loads of composting
material near the monitor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On November 22, 2019, Ecology submitted a maintenance plan to cover
the second 10-year maintenance period, asserting that existing control
measures were adequate to maintain the PM10 NAAQS, after
excluding specific exceptional events documented in the submission. On
December 20, 2019, we proposed to approve the second 10-year
maintenance plan as satisfying the requirements of section 175A of the
CAA (84 FR 70130).
II. Response to Comments
The public comment period for our proposed rule ended on January
21, 2020. We received one comment letter from the J.R. Simplot Company
(Simplot), the owner and operator of the Simplot Feeders cattle
feedlot, a facility located in the Wallula area and identified in the
state's second 10-year maintenance plan. The comment letter generally
supported approval of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for
the Wallula area. However, Simplot's letter also requested
clarification on the following three
[[Page 25304]]
issues: The feedlot Fugitive Dust Control Plan (FDCP), the emissions
inventory, and the projected future design value concentrations used in
the maintenance demonstration.
Comment 1: ``Simplot offers clarifications to EPA's summary of the
FDCP provided in the FR notice (84 FR 70132). Simplot's FDCP does not
`prevent dust from any fugitive or point source from crossing the
Simplot property line,' nor does it `require road dust suppression,
better staff training, etc.' The FDCP meets the WAC requirements for
fugitive dust and `fall-out' and identifies best management practices
(BMPs) that have been found to be the most effective in minimizing
fugitive dust emissions from the facility. Examples of those BMPs that
are implemented as appropriate include water application to pens and
roads, application of dust suppression on facility roads, as well as
pen cleaning and maintenance. The FDCP also identifies the training
provided to facility employees who have responsibility with
implementing BMPs.''
Response 1: The EPA disagrees with the commenter. The Simplot
Feeders' cattle feedlot is subject to a federally-enforceable new
source review permit (Approval Order No. 18AQ-E018, issued March 5,
2018) that specifically requires Simplot to have and implement a
fugitive dust control plan. Specifically, facility-wide permit
condition 2.2.1. states, ``During operation of the feedlot, Simplot
shall follow the fugitive dust control plan submitted to Ecology, and
modified annually in accordance with the facility Operations and
Maintenance (O&M) Plan. Fugitive dust control measures shall be
sufficient to prevent dust from any fugitive or point sources from
crossing the Simplot property line.'' Additionally, permit condition 9
states, ``A site-specific O&M manual for the hay processing filters,
any feedlot sprinklers or cross fencing systems or other feedlot Best
Management Practices (BMPs), monitoring equipment, monitoring
procedures, and monitoring schedules for the feedlot control (BMPs)
measures shall be developed and followed . . . The O&M manual shall at
a minimum include: . . .9.4 The current Fugitive Dust Control Plan
(FDCP).'' Simplot's FDCP, in turn, specifically provides for road dust
suppression, better staff training, daily observations, and daily
adaptive best management practices to control fugitive dust.\3\
Therefore, the language in the proposal accurately reflects Simplot's
legal obligations with respect to Simplot's FDCP and no clarification
is required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Road dust suppression (see FDCP ``Water Trucks'' and ``Road
Treatment'' page 7); staff training (see FDCP ``Training'' page 9);
daily observations (see FDCP ``Sprinkler System'' page 6, ``Water
Trucks'' page 7, ``Daily Adaptive Management'' pages 8-9); and daily
adaptive management (see FDCP ``Daily Adaptive Management'' pages 8-
9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment 2: ``Simplot appreciates EPA's recognition that Ecology's
revised emission factor for the cattle feedlots is a conservative
approach (84 FR 70132); however, Simplot believes use of Ecology's
updated emission factor mischaracterizes the change in emissions
between baseline years presented in the SIP.
Specifically, Ecology failed to provide context regarding the
effect of the new emission factor with respect to the 2002 emission
inventory in the SIP. During the public comment period of the draft
SIP, Simplot provided comments to Ecology (Attachment 2) that the
activity levels, including cattle headcount was higher at the feedlot
in 2002 than in 2014. As such, the relative emissions for the feedlot
were higher in 2002 than in 2014. Simplot identified that applying the
updated emission factor to the 2002 data would show a relative decrease
rather than the increase Ecology presented in Table 7 of the SIP.''
Response 2: Simplot's clarification is noted. However, we believe
this issue was already adequately addressed in our proposed rulemaking
when we stated, ``The overall source mix and emissions levels are
generally consistent with the 2002 attainment emissions inventory
contained in the first 10-year maintenance plan. While there has been
some increase in emissions activity since 2002, Ecology explained and
the EPA verified that much of the difference between the 2002 and 2014
inventories is due to revised emissions inventory methodology. For
example, Ecology revised the emissions factor for cattle feedlots by
increasing it approximately eightfold, a conservative approach.'' See
page 70131.
We note two factors related to Simplot's comment. First, it is not
unusual for emissions inventory methodologies or emissions factors to
change over time at the state or federal level with additional research
or source test data. Second, the conservative methodology used by
Ecology yielded a 2025 projected design value concentration of 145
[mu]g/m\3\, below the 150 [mu]g/m\3\ threshold for demonstrating
continued attainment the PM10 NAAQS in the Wallula area. Any
argument for using a less conservative approach, yielding a lower
projected design value concentration, would therefore not change the
EPA's approval of Ecology's maintenance demonstration because the
worst-case scenario is already below 150 [mu]g/m\3\.
Comment 3: ``Simplot agrees with EPA's position that Ecology took a
conservative approach for emission projections (years 2025 and 2030) by
including highest actual emissions, potential to emit, and maximum
permitted capacity (84 FR 70132). EPA discusses that Ecology used the
most conservative methodology in determining the 2025 design
concentration, where the design concentration was determined to be 145
[mu]g/m\3\, below the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS of 150 ug/m\3\. EPA
goes on to state that using `a less conservative methodology factoring
the natural events and using maximum 5-year actual rather than maximum
allowable permit limits, the projected 2025 design concentration would
be 82 [mu]g/m\3\' (84 FR 70132) . . . There is no additional value to
including an analysis of Simplot's actual maximum head count for an
alternative 2025 Design Value. Simplot recommends that EPA, in its
final action on the Wallula SIP, drop the alternative 2025 Design Value
based on Simplot's actual maximum heat count.''
Response 3: As discussed previously, Ecology used a generally
conservative, worst-case scenario methodology in projecting potential
future emissions and PM10 concentrations. Specifically, as
it relates to Simplot, the 2025 projected future design concentration
of 145 [mu]g/m\3\ represented no consideration of potential natural
events and assumed the Simplot facility would be operating at maximum
permitted capacity (80,000 head of cattle). Because of concerns that
the general public might not understand the worst-case scenario
methodology, Ecology provided supplemental future design concentrations
using less conservative methodologies for informational, rather than
regulatory purposes. These supplementary projected concentrations
ranged from 71 [mu]g/m\3\ to 132 [mu]g/m\3\, more consistent with
historical and current concentrations monitored in the Wallula area if
potential natural events are considered. However, the EPA's proposed
approval was based on our determination that the 2025 projected future
design concentration of 145 [mu]g/m\3\, calculated in the maintenance
demonstration, was below the 150 [mu]g/m\3\ threshold for demonstrating
continued attainment the PM10 NAAQS in the Wallula area.
We have determined the commenter's requested clarifications are not
warranted at this time because we have explained our rationale for
approval in
[[Page 25305]]
our proposed rule and in the response to comments provided in this
preamble, and the additional analysis is not necessary in light of our
approval at the higher projected emissions levels. Therefore, we are
finalizing our action as proposed.
III. Final Action
The EPA is approving Ecology's second 10-year maintenance plan for
the Wallula area as satisfying the requirements of section 175A of the
CAA. We are taking final agency action on Ecology's request to exclude
wildfire and high wind event-influenced data from August 14, 2015, and
September 5 and 6, 2017, with the determination that the
PM10 exceedances on the identified dates were due to
exceptional events and can be excluded in determining the attainment
status of the area.
We are also approving and incorporating by reference into the SIP
at 40 CFR 52.2470(d), updated source-specific requirements for Tyson
Fresh Meats, Boise White Paper, now known as Packaging Corporation of
America (Wallula Mill),\4\ and Simplot Feeders. In addition, we are
updating the list of supplementary documents in 40 CFR 52.2470(e) to
include the 2003 ``Columbia Plateau Windblown Dust Natural Events
Action Plan'' and Ecology's 2018 update of the ``Fugitive Dust Control
Guidelines for Beef Cattle Feedlots and Best Management Practices.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Note that, subsequent to EPA's proposed action, Ecology
submitted a modified air operating permit for the Wallula Mill,
which was issued on December 9, 2019. The only changes to the permit
relevant for purposes of this action are that the name of the
permittee was changed from Boise White Paper L.L.C. to Packaging
Corporation of America and that Permit Condition Q.1, which we had
proposed to approve into the SIP, is now numbered Condition P.1. No
substantive changes have been made to the provision proposed for
incorporation by reference into the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In taking final action to approve Ecology's second 10-year
maintenance plan for the Wallula area, we note, as discussed
previously, that the first 10-year maintenance plan for the area did
not contain any control measures on direct PM10 emissions
from on-road vehicles because the emissions inventory was so heavily
dominated by direct PM10 emissions from agricultural dust
sources and a small set of point sources. In comparing the 2002
inventory used in the first 10-year maintenance plan to the 2014
inventory used in the second 10-year maintenance plan, mobile source
emissions continued to remain steady at 1% of the overall emissions
inventory. Because on-road emissions of direct PM10 continue
to be insignificant, a regional emissions analysis is not required as
part future transportation conformity determinations. However, a
conformity determination that meets other applicable criteria in Table
1 of 40 CFR 93.109(b) is still required (e.g., consultation). Hot-spot
requirements for projects in PM10 areas in 40 CFR 93.116
must also be satisfied, subject to certain exceptions. See 40 CFR
93.109(f). In 2017, the boundaries of the Walla Walla Valley
Metropolitan Planning Organization were modified to include the Wallula
PM10 maintenance area. As such, the area is now considered
to be a metropolitan area for transportation conformity purposes and
must meet the applicability requirements in 40 CFR 93.102(a) and the
frequency requirements in 40 CFR 93.104.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference as described in
the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials generally available through
https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information). Therefore, these
materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have
been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully
federally-enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's approval, and will
be incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because it does not address technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Washington or any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
[[Page 25306]]
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 30, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 10, 2020.
Christopher Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW--Washington
0
2. In Sec. 52.2470:
0
a. Amend the table in paragraph (d) by:
0
i. Removing the entries ``IBP (now known as Tyson Foods, Inc.)'',
``Boise White Paper LLC Permit'', and ``Fugitive Dust Control Plan for
Simplot Feeders Limited Partnership''; and
0
ii. Adding the entries ``Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.'', ``Packaging
Corporation of America, Wallula Mill'', and ``Simplot Feeders Limited
Partnership'' at the end of the table; and
0
b. In paragraph (e) amend Table 2 by:
0
i. Adding a fourth entry for ``Particulate Matter (PM10) 2nd
10-Year Maintenance Plan'' immediately below the entry ``Particulate
Matter (PM10) 2nd 10-Year Limited Maintenance Plan'',
``Spokane'' and
0
ii. Adding the entries ``2003 Columbia Plateau Windblown Dust Natural
Events Action Plan'' and ``2018 Fugitive Dust Control Guidelines for
Beef Cattle Feedlots and Best Management Practices'' at the end of the
table.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.2470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved State of Washington Source-Specific Requirements \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of source Order/permit No. effective EPA approval date Explanations
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.......... 13AQ-E526.......... 4/16/2014 5/1/2020, [Insert Except:
Federal Register 1. Decontamination
citation]. Cabinets;
2. Meat Cutting/
Packing;
6. Wastewater
Floatation;
8. Utility Equipment;
10. Other;
References to ``WAC 173-
460-040'' in
Determinations'';
The portion of Approval
Condition 2.a which
states, ``and
consumption of no more
than 128 million cubic
feet/of natural gas
per year. Natural gas
consumption records
for the dryer shall be
maintained for the
most recent 24 month
period and be
available to Ecology
for inspection. An
increase in natural
gas consumption that
exceeds the above
level may require a
Notice of
Construction.'';
Approval Condition 3;
Approval Condition 4;
Approval Condition 5;
Approval Condition
6.e; Approval
Condition 9.a.ii;
Approval Condition
9.a.iv; Approval
Condition 9.a.v;
Approval Condition
9.a.vi; Approval
Condition 10.a.ii;
Approval Condition
10.b; Approval
Condition 11.a;
Approval Condition
11.b; Approval
Condition 11.e;
Approval Condition 12;
Approval Condition 15;
The section titled
``Your Right to
Appeal''; and The
section titled
``Address and Location
Information.''
Packaging Corporation of America 0003697............ 4/1/2018 5/1/2020, [Insert Condition P.1 only.
(Wallula Mill). Federal Register
citation].
Simplot Feeders Limited Fugitive Dust 3/1/2018 5/1/2020, [Insert
Partnership. Control Plan. Federal Register
citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA does not have the authority to remove these source-specific requirements in the absence of a
demonstration that their removal would not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS, violate any
prevention of significant deterioration increment or result in visibility impairment. Washington Department of
Ecology may request removal by submitting such a demonstration to the EPA as a SIP revision.
(e) * * *
[[Page 25307]]
Table 2--Attainment, Maintenance, and Other Plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable State
Name of SIP provision geographic or submittal EPA approval date Explanations
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attainment and Maintenance Planning--Particulate Matter (PM)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Particulate Matter (PM10) 2nd 10- Wallula............. 11/22/19 5/1/2020, [Insert
Year Maintenance Plan. Federal Register
citation].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Supplementary Documents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
2003 Columbia Plateau Windblown .................... 11/22/19 5/1/2020, [Insert
Dust Natural Events Action Plan. Federal Register
citation].
2018 Fugitive Dust Control .................... 11/22/19 5/1/2020, [Insert
Guidelines for Beef Cattle Federal Register
Feedlots and Best Management citation].
Practices.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2020-08123 Filed 4-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P