[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 51 (Monday, March 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14734-14736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04991]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. USCBP-2019-0041]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection-022 Electronic
Visa Update System (EVUS) System of Records
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is issuing a final
rule to amend its regulations to exempt portions of a newly updated
system of records titled, ``Department of Homeland Security/U.S.
Customs and Border Protection-022 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS)
System of Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
Specifically, the Department exempts portions of this system of records
from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 16, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
Debra L. Danisek (202) 344-1610, CBP Privacy Officer, Privacy and
Diversity Office, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20229. For
privacy issues please contact: Jonathan R. Cantor (202) 343-1717,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NRPM) in
the Federal Register (8 FR 30632 June 27, 2019) proposing to exempt
portions of DHS/CBP-022 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) System of
Records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. DHS
issued the ``DHS/CBP-022 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) System of
Records'' in the Federal Register at 8 FR 30751 on June 27, 2019, to
provide notice to the public to (1) clarify that the EVUS enrollment
information includes questions
[[Page 14735]]
necessary to evaluate whether a covered alien's travel to the United
States poses a law enforcement or security risk, and to make
administrative changes to remove references to the specific EVUS
application questions and data elements; (2) provide additional
transparency that vetting results are retained in ATS; (3) expand the
previously issued exemptions to clarify that DHS/CBP is exempting
certain portions of records in this system from provisions of the
Privacy Act of 1974 because of criminal, civil and administrative
enforcement requirements; and (4) to add new Routine Uses and clarify
previously issued ones.
DHS/CBP invited comments on both the (NPRM) and System of Records
Notice (SORN).
II. Public Comments
DHS received no comments on the NPRM and no comments on the SORN.
DHS will implement the rulemaking as proposed.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS amends Chapter I of
Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. In Appendix C to Part 5, revise paragraph 74 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
74. The DHS/CBP-022 Electronic Visa Update System (EVUS) System
of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used
by DHS and its components. The DHS/CBP-022 EVUS System of Records is
a repository of information held by DHS in connection with its
several and varied missions and functions, including the enforcement
of civil and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings thereunder; national security and intelligence
activities. This system of records covers information collected by,
on behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its
components and may contain personally identifiable information
collected by other federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or
international government agencies. As part of the process of
determining EVUS eligibility or admissibility to the United States,
CBP collects two types of data for which it claims different
exemptions.
(a) CBP will not assert any exemption to limit an individual
from accessing or amending his or her record under subsection
552a(d) with respect to information maintained in the system as it
relates to data submitted by or on behalf of a person who travels to
visit the United States and crosses the border, nor shall an
exemption be asserted with respect to the resulting determination
(approval or denial). However, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), CBP
will not disclose the fact that a law enforcement or intelligence
agency has sought particular records because it may affect ongoing
law enforcement activities, and thus, the Secretary of Homeland
Security has exempted such records covered by this system from
sections (c)(3), (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, as is necessary and appropriate to protect this
information. Further, DHS will claim exemption from section (c)(3)
of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2) as is necessary and appropriate to protect this
information.
(b) Additionally, this system contains law enforcement and other
derogatory records or information recompiled from or created from
information contained in other systems of records that are exempt
from certain provisions of the Privacy Act, and possibly relied upon
as the basis for denial of an EVUS application. For these records or
information only, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d)(1)-
(4); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I),
(e)(5), and (e)(8); (f); and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act, 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d)(1)-(4); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I); and (f).
Exemptions from these particular subsections cited above under
(a) and (b) are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined
at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(i) From subsection (c)(3) and (c)(4) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the accounting of disclosures could
alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(ii) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records)
because access to the records contained in this system of records
could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence
of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere
with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose
security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland
security.
(iii) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(iv) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(v) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal
the identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
(vi) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I)
(Agency Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of
this system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(vii) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training
and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(viii) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
[[Page 14736]]
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(ix) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Jonathan R. Cantor,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020-04991 Filed 3-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P