[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3732-3736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Release No. 34-87976; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2020-001]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change 
Relating To Amend Its Rules Governing the Give Up of a Clearing Member 
by a User on Exchange Transactions

January 15, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on January 2, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
````EDGX'''') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule 
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to 
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 3733]]

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options'') 
proposes to amend its rules governing the give up of a Clearing Member 
by a User on Exchange transactions. The text of the proposed rule 
change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 21.12, which governs the give 
up of a Clearing Member \5\ by a User \6\ on Exchange transactions, to 
substantially conform to existing Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe 
Options'') Rule 5.10, proposed Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2 Options'') 
Rule 6.30, and proposed Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX Options'') Rule 
21.12.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Clearing Member'' means an Options Member that is 
self-clearing or an Options Member that clears EDGX Options 
Transactions for other Members of EDGX Options. See Exchange Rule 
16.1.
    \6\ The term ``User'' means any Options Member or Sponsored 
Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the System 
pursuant to Rule 11.3 (Access). See Exchange Rule 16.1.
    \7\ See SR-C2-2020-001 (filed January 2, 2020) and SR-CboeBZX-
2020-002 (filed January 2, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    By way of background, Exchange Rule 21.12 provides that when a User 
executes a transaction on the Exchange, it must give up the name of the 
Clearing Member (the ``Give Up'') through which the transaction will be 
cleared. Rule 21.12 also provides that a User may only give up a 
``Designated Give Up'' \8\ or its ``Guarantor.'' \9\ This limitation is 
enforced by the Exchange's trading systems.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Rule 21.12(b)(1).
    \9\ See Exchange Rule 21.12(b)(2).
    \10\ See Exchange Rule 21.12(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A ``Designated Give Up'' of a User refers to a Clearing Member 
identified to the Exchange by that User as a Clearing Member the User 
requests the ability to give up and that has been processed by the 
Exchange as a Designated Give Up.\11\ To designate a ``Designated Give 
Up'' every User (other than a Market-Maker) must submit written 
notification, in a form and manner prescribed by the Exchange.\12\ 
Specifically, the Exchange uses a standardized form (``Notification 
Form'') that a User needs to complete and submit to the Exchange's 
Membership Services Department (``MSD'').\13\ The Exchange notes that a 
User may currently designate any Clearing Member as a Designated Give 
Up.\14\ Additionally, there is no minimum or maximum number of 
Designated Give Ups that a User must identify. Paragraph (d) of Rule 
21.12 also requires that the Exchange notify a Clearing Member, in 
writing and as soon as practicable, of each User that has identified it 
as a Designated Give Up. The Exchange however, will not accept any 
instructions from a Clearing Member to prohibit a User from designating 
the Clearing Member as a Designated Give Up. Additionally, there is no 
subjective evaluation of a User's list of proposed Designated Give Ups 
by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Supra note 7.
    \12\ See Exchange Rule 21.12(b)(3).
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of Rule 21.12, a ``Guarantor'' of an executing User 
refers to a Clearing Member that has issued a Letter of Guarantee for 
the executing User under the Rules of the Exchange that are in effect 
at the time of the execution of the applicable trade.\15\ An executing 
User may give up its Guarantor without having to first designate it to 
the Exchange as a ``Designated Give Up.'' \16\ Additionally, the 
Exchange notes that a Market-Maker is only enabled to give up the 
Guarantor of the Market-Maker pursuant to Exchange Rule 22.8 and also 
does not need to identify any Designated Give Ups.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Supra note 8.
    \16\ The Exchange already knows each User's Guarantor and as 
such, no further designation or identification is required of Users 
to enable their respective Guarantors. See Exchange Rule 
21.12(b)(6).
    \17\ See Exchange Rule 21.12(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Beginning in early 2018, certain Clearing Members (in conjunction 
with the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association 
(``SIFMA'')) expressed concerns related to the process by which 
executing brokers on U.S. options exchanges (the ``Exchanges'') are 
allowed to designate or `give up' a clearing firm for purposes of 
clearing particular transactions. The SIFMA-affiliated Clearing Members 
have recently identified the current give up process as a significant 
source of risk for clearing firms. SIFMA-affiliated Clearing Members 
subsequently requested that the Exchanges alleviate this risk by 
amending Exchange rules governing the give up process.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Cboe Options recently modified its give up procedure under 
rule 5.10 to allow clearing trading permit holders to ``Opt In'' 
such that the clearing trading permit holder (``TPH'') may specify 
which Cboe Options TPH organizations are authorized to give up that 
clearing trading permit holder. See Securities and Exchange Act 
Release No. 86401 (July 17, 2019), 84 FR 35433 (July 23, 2019) (SR-
CBOE-19-036) (``Cboe Options Rule 5.10 Amendment''). Nasdaq PHLX LLC 
(``PHLX''), NYSE Arca, Inc., (``NYSE Arca''), and NYSE American LLC 
(``NYSE American'') also recently modified their respect give up 
rules to adopt an ``Opt In'' process. See also Securities and 
Exchange Act Release No. 85136 (February 14, 2019), 84 FR 5526 
(February 21, 2019) (SR-PHLX-2018-72), Securities and Exchange Act 
Release No. 85871 (May 16, 2019), 84 FR 23613 (May 22, 2019) (SR-
NYSEArca 2019-32) and Securities and Exchange Act Release 85875 (May 
16, 2019), 84 FR 23591 (May 22, 2019) (SR-NYSEAMER-2019-17). The 
Exchange's proposal leads to the same result of providing its 
Clearing Member's the ability to control risk and includes PHLX's, 
NYSE Arca's and NYSE American's ``Opt In'' process, but it otherwise 
differs slightly in process from their give up rules. For example, 
the Exchange intends to maintain its provisions relating to 
Designated Give Ups and eliminate its provisions relating to the 
rejection of a trade. The Exchange's proposal is substantially the 
same as the existing give up process on Cboe Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    Based on the above, the Exchange now seeks to amend its rules 
regarding the current give up process in order to allow a Clearing 
Member to ``opt in'', at the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') 
clearing number level, to a feature that, if enabled by the Clearing 
Member, will allow the Clearing Member to specify which Users are 
authorized to give up that OCC clearing number. As proposed, Rule 21.12 
will continue to require that Users identify to the Exchange, via the 
Notification Form, all Clearing Members that the User would like to 
have the ability to give up (i.e., Designated Give Ups).\19\ However, 
the Exchange proposes to modify the language of paragraph (a) to 
provide that a User may indicate, at the time of the trade or through 
post trade allocation, any OCC number of the

[[Page 3734]]

Clearing Member through which the transaction will be cleared.\20\ The 
Exchange proposes to also add to Rule 21.12(a) that Clearing Members 
may elect to ``Opt In,'' as defined in paragraph (c) of the proposed 
Rule and described further below, and restrict one or more of its OCC 
number(s) (``Restricted OCC Number'').\21\ A User may Give Up a 
Restricted OCC Number provided the User has written authorization as 
described in paragraph (c)(2) (``Authorized User'').\22\ The Exchange 
notes that if a User identifies a particular Clearing Member as a 
Designated Give Up, but that Clearing Member has restricted its OCC 
number(s) and has not authorized the User to give it up, then the 
Exchange will not give effect to the designation on the Notification 
Form (i.e., the User will not be able to give up that Clearing Member 
even though it was identified as a Designated Give Up). Similarly, if a 
Clearing Member authorizes a User to give up its Restricted OCC 
Number(s), the Exchange will not enable that Clearing Member as a give 
up for that User until and unless the User identifies that Clearing 
Member as a Designated Give Up on a Notification Form. In light of 
Clearing Members having the ability to restrict their OCC numbers from 
being given up by unauthorized Users, the Exchange also proposes to 
eliminate the process for Clearing Members to ``reject'' trades. As 
such, the Exchange proposes to eliminate subparagraphs (e) and (f) of 
Rule 21.12 and any other references to the process in Rule 21.12.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id.
    \20\ The Exchange notes that Cboe Options plans to amend 
paragraph (a) of Rule 5.10 to conform to proposed paragraph (a) of 
EDGX Options Rule 21.12 and C2 Options Rule 6.30 with a slight 
modification as it relates to floor trading on Cboe Options.
    \21\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(a); see also Cboe Options 
Rule 21.12(a).
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ The Exchange notes that Cboe Options similarly eliminated 
the process for which Clearing Trading Permit Holders may ``reject'' 
trades in Rule 5.10. See the Cboe Options Rule 5.10 Amendment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 21.12(c) provides that Clearing Members may request 
the Exchange restrict one or more of their OCC clearing numbers (``Opt 
In'') from being given up unless otherwise authorized.\24\ If a 
Clearing Member Opts In, the Exchange will require written 
authorization from the Clearing Member permitting a User to give up a 
Clearing Member's Restricted OCC Number.\25\ An Opt In would remain in 
effect until the Clearing Member terminates the Opt In as described in 
proposed subparagraph (3).\26\ If a Clearing Member does not Opt In, 
that Clearing Member's OCC number may be subject to being given up by 
any User that has designated it as a Designated Give Up.\27\ Proposed 
Rule 21.12(c)(1) will set forth the process by which a Clearing Member 
may Opt In.\28\ Specifically, a Clearing Member may Opt In by sending a 
completed ``Clearing Member Restriction Form'' listing all Restricted 
OCC Numbers and Authorized Users.\29\ A copy of the proposed form is 
included in Exhibit 3. A Clearing Member may elect to restrict one or 
more OCC clearing numbers that are registered in its name at OCC.\30\ 
The Clearing Member would be required to submit the Clearing Member 
Restriction Form to the Exchange's MSD as described on the form.\31\ 
Once submitted, the Exchange requires ninety days before a Restricted 
OCC Number is effective within the System.\32\ This time period is to 
provide adequate time for the Users of that Restricted OCC Number who 
are not initially specified by the Clearing Member as Authorized Users 
to obtain the required written authorization from the Clearing Member 
for that Restricted OCC Number. Such Users would still be able to give 
up that Restricted OCC Number during this ninety day period (i.e., 
until the number becomes restricted within the System).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(c); see also Cboe Options 
Rule 5.10(c).
    \25\ Id.
    \26\ Id.
    \27\ Id.
    \28\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(c)(1); see also Cboe 
Options Rule 5.10(c)(1).
    \29\ This form will be available on the Exchange's website. The 
Exchange will also maintain, on its website, a list of the 
Restricted OCC Numbers, which will be updated on a regular basis, 
and the Clearing Member's contact information to assist Users (to 
the extent they are not already Authorized Users) with requesting 
authorization for a Restricted OCC Number. The Exchange may utilize 
additional means to inform its Members of such updates on a periodic 
basis.
    \30\ Supra note 29.
    \31\ Id.
    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 21.12(c)(2) will set forth the process for Users to 
give up a Clearing Member's Restricted OCC Number.\33\ Specifically, a 
User desiring to give up a Restricted OCC Number must become an 
Authorized User.\34\ The Clearing Member will be required to authorize 
a User as described in subparagraph (1) or (3) of Rule 21.12(c) (i.e., 
through a Clearing Member Restriction Form), unless the Restricted OCC 
Number is already subject to a Letter of Guarantee that the User is a 
party to, as set forth in Rule 21.12(b)(6).\35\ Pursuant to proposed 
Rule 21.12(c)(3), a Clearing Member may amend the list of its 
Authorized Users or Restricted OCC Numbers by submitting a new Clearing 
Member Restriction Form to the Exchange's MSD indicating the amendment 
as described on the form.\36\ Once a Restricted OCC Number is effective 
within the System pursuant to Rule 21.12(c)(1), the Exchange may permit 
the Clearing Member to authorize, or remove authorization for, a User 
to give up the Restricted OCC Number intra-day only in unusual 
circumstances, and on the next business day in all regular 
circumstances.\37\ The Exchange will promptly notify Users if they are 
no longer authorized to give up a Clearing Member's Restricted OCC 
Number.\38\ If a Clearing Member removes a Restricted OCC Number, any 
User may give up that OCC clearing number once the removal has become 
effective on or before the next business day, provided that Clearing 
Member has been designated as a Designated Give Up.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(c)(2); see also Cboe 
Option Rule 5.10(c)(2).
    \34\ Id.
    \35\ Id.
    \36\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(c)(3); see also Cboe 
Options Rule 5.10(c)(3).
    \37\ Id.
    \38\ Id.
    \39\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend current subparagraph (c) 
(System) (to be relettered to paragraph (d)) of Rule 21.12 to clarify 
that in addition to the Exchange's system not accepting orders that 
identify a give up that is not at the time a Designated Give Up or a 
Guarantor, the System will also reject any order that designates a 
Restricted OCC Number for which the User is not an Authorized User.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(d); see also Cboe Options 
Rule 5.10(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend current paragraph (d) (Notice to 
Clearing Members) (to be relettered to paragraph (e)) of Rule 21.12 to 
provide that the Exchange will provide notice to Users that they are 
authorized or unauthorized by Clearing Members.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \41\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(e); see also Cboe Options 
Rule 5.10(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend current paragraph (g) (Other 
Give Up Changes) (to be relettered to subparagraph (f)) of Rule 21.12 
to provide that a User may change the give up on the trade to another 
Designated Give Up, provided it's an Authorized User for any Restricted 
OCC Number, or to its Grantor.\42\ Additionally, the Exchange seeks to 
define a specific ``Trade Date Cutoff Time'' \43\ and ``T+1

[[Page 3735]]

Cutoff Time'' in the rule text of proposed paragraph (f).\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(f); see also Cboe Options 
Rule 5.10(f).
    \43\ The ``Trade Date Cutoff Time'' is established by the 
Clearing Corporation (or 15 minutes thereafter if the Exchange 
receives and is able to process a request to extend its time of 
final trade submission to the Clearing Corporation). See proposed 
Exchange Rule 21.12(f)(1); see also Cboe Options Rule 5.10(f)(1).
    \44\ The ``T+1 Cutoff Time'' is 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on T+1; 
see proposed Exchange Rule 21.12(f)(3); see also Cboe Options Rule 
5.10(f)(3) (which provides a cutoff time of 12:00 p.m. Central 
Time).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proses to amend current paragraph (h) (Responsibility) 
(to be relettered to paragraph (g)) of Rule 21.12 to eliminate any 
applicable reference to current paragraph (e) or (f) of the Rule and to 
conform with Cboe Options Rule 5.10(g).
    The Exchange also proposes to adopt subparagraph (h) of Rule 21.12 
to provide that an intentional misuse of this Rule is impermissible, 
and may be treated as a violation of Rule 3.1, titled ``Business 
Conduct of Members.'' \45\ This language will make clear that the 
Exchange will regulate an intentional misuse of this Rule, and that 
such behavior would be a violation of Exchange rules. The proposed 
language is similar to corresponding provisions in other exchanges' 
give up rules.\46\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ See Cboe Options Rule 5.10(h), which states that 
intentional misuse of Rule 5.10 may be treated as a violation of 
Rule 8.1 (Just and Equitable Principles of Trade).
    \46\ See, e.g., Cboe Options Rule 5.10(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange proposes to amend its current Member 
Notification of Designated Give Ups Form (``Designated Give Ups 
Form''). As of October 7, 2019 the Exchange and each of its affiliated 
options exchanges (i.e., C2 Options, BZX Options, and Cboe Options 
(collectively, ``Cboe Markets'')) are on the same technology platform. 
To provide further harmonization across the Cboe Markets and provide 
more seamless administration of the Give up rule, the Exchange proposes 
to eliminate the current Designated Give Ups Form and adopt a new form 
which would be applicable to all Cboe Markets going forward. The 
proposed Designated Give Ups Form is included in Exhibit 3.
Implementation Date
    The Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date of the 
proposed rule change in an Exchange Notice, to be published no later 
than thirty (30) days following the operative date. The implementation 
date will be no later than sixty (60) days following the operative 
date.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the 
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the 
Act.\47\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change 
is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \48\ requirements that the rules 
of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts 
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitation transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is 
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \49\ requirement that the rules of 
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \48\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \49\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Particularly, as discussed above, several clearing firms affiliated 
with SIFMA have recently expressed concerns relating to the current 
give up process, which permits Users to identify any Clearing Member as 
a Designated Give Up for purposes of clearing particular transactions, 
and have identified the current give up process (i.e., a process that 
lacks authorization) as a significant source of risk for clearing 
firms. The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to Rule 21.12 
help alleviate this risk by enabling Clearing Members to `Opt In' to 
restrict one or more of its OCC clearing numbers (i.e., Restricted OCC 
Numbers), and to specify which Authorized Users may give up those 
Restricted OCC Numbers. As described above, all other Users would be 
required to receive written authorization from the Clearing Member 
before they can give up that Clearing Member's Restricted OCC Number. 
The Exchange believes that this authorization provides proper 
safeguards and protections for Clearing Members as it provides controls 
for Clearing Members to restrict access to their OCC clearing numbers, 
allowing access only to those Authorized Users upon their request. The 
Exchange also believes that its proposed Clearing Member Restriction 
Form allows the Exchange to receive in a uniform fashion, written and 
transparent authorization from Clearing Members, which ensures seamless 
administration of the Rule.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed Opt In process strikes the 
right balance between the various views and interests across the 
industry. For example, although the proposed rule would require Users 
(other than Authorized Users) to seek authorization from Clearing 
Members in order to have the ability to give them up, each User will 
still have the ability to give up a Restricted OCC Number that is 
subject to a Letter of Guarantee without obtaining any further 
authorization if that User is party to that arrangement. The Exchange 
also notes that to the extent the executing User has a clearing 
arrangement with a Clearing Member (i.e., through a Letter of 
Guarantee), a trade can be assigned to the executing User's guarantor. 
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is 
reasonable and continues to provide certainty that a Clearing Member 
would be responsible for a trade, which protects investors and the 
public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe 
that the proposed rule change will impose an unnecessary burden on 
intramarket competition because it would apply equally to all similarly 
situated Members. The Exchange also notes that, should the proposed 
changes make the Exchange more attractive for trading, market 
participants trading on other exchanges can always elect to become 
Members on the Exchange to take advantage of the trading opportunities. 
Furthermore, the proposed rule change does not address any competitive 
issues and ultimately, the target of the Exchange's proposal is to 
reduce risk for Clearing Members under the current give up model. 
Clearing firms make financial decisions based on risk and reward, and 
while it is generally in their beneficial interest to clear 
transactions for market participants in order to generate profit, it is 
the Exchange's understanding from SIFMA and clearing firms that the 
current process can create significant risk when the clearing firm can 
be given up on any market participant's transaction, even where there 
is no prior customer relationship or authorization for that designated 
transaction. In the absence of a mechanism that governs a market 
participant's use of a Clearing Member's services, the Exchange's 
proposal may indirectly facilitate the ability of a Clearing Member to 
manage their existing customer relationships while continuing to allow 
market participant

[[Page 3736]]

choice in broker execution services. While Clearing Members may compete 
with executing brokers for order flow, the Exchange does not believe 
this proposal imposes an undue burden on competition. Rather, the 
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change balances the need for 
Clearing Members to manage risks and allows them to address outlier 
behavior from executing brokers while still allowing freedom of choice 
to select an executing broker.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received written comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) 
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) 
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such 
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective 
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \50\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \51\ 
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \50\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \51\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) 
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission 
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at 
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed 
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. 
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does 
not become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing. However, 
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \52\ permits the Commission to designate a 
shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of 
investors and the public interest. In its filing, the Exchange 
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The 
Exchange represented that the proposal establishes a rule regarding the 
give up of a Clearing Member in order to help clearing firms manage 
risk while continuing to allow market participants choice in broker 
execution services. The Commission notes that it recently approved a 
substantially similar proposed rule change from Phlx, after which other 
options exchanges subsequently adopted subatantially similarly 
rules.\53\ The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative 
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public 
interest, because the Exchange's proposal raises no new issues. 
Further, such waiver will permit the Exchange, without further delay, 
to begin implementing the new standardized give up process, thus 
aligning its give up process with that of the other option exchanges. 
Accordingly, the Commission waives the 30-day operative delay and 
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \52\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \53\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85136 (February 14, 
2019), 84 FR 5526 (February 21, 2019) (Phlx-2018-72) (order 
approving a proposed rule change to establish rules governing give 
ups). See also supra note 18 (citing the filings in which other 
options exchanges adopted substantially similar rules).
    \54\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, 
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on 
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-001 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-001. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-001 and should be 
submitted on or before February 12, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \55\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\55\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-00914 Filed 1-21-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P