[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68915-68920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27115]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Student Support Services Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for the
Student Support Services (SSS) Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.042A. This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB control number 1840-0017.
DATES:
Applications Available: December 17, 2019.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: January 27, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: March 26, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lavelle Wright, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 268-24, Washington, DC 20202-
4260. Telephone: (202) 453-7739. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purpose of the SSS Program is to increase
the number of disadvantaged, low-income college students, first-
generation college students, and college students with disabilities in
the United States who successfully complete a program of study at the
postsecondary level. The support services that are provided should
increase the retention and graduation rates for these categories of
students and facilitate their transfer from two-year to four-year
colleges and universities. The support services should also foster an
institutional climate that supports the success of students who are
limited English proficient, students from groups that are historically
underrepresented in postsecondary education, students with
disabilities, students who are homeless children and youths, students
who are in foster care or are aging out of the foster care system, and
other disconnected students. Student support services should also
improve the financial and economic literacy of students.
Priorities: This notice contains two competitive preference
priorities. Competitive Preference Priorities 1 and
[[Page 68916]]
2 are from the Secretary's Notice of Final Supplemental Priorities and
Definitions for Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on March 2, 2018 (83 FR 9096) (Supplemental Priorities).
Note: Applicants must include, in the one-page abstract submitted
with the application, a statement indicating which, if any, of the
competitive preference priorities are addressed. If the applicant has
addressed the competitive preference priorities, this information must
also be listed on the SSS Program Profile Form.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent
year for which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award up to an additional
five points to an application, depending on how well the application
meets these priorities.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Fostering Flexible and
Affordable Paths to Obtaining Knowledge and Skills (up to 3 points).
Projects that are designed to address improving collaboration
between education providers and employers to ensure student learning
objectives are aligned with the skills or knowledge required for
employment in in-demand industry sectors or occupations (as defined in
section 3(23) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014).
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Fostering Knowledge and
Promoting the Development of Skills That Prepare Students To Be
Informed, Thoughtful, and Productive Individuals and Citizens (up to 2
points).
Projects that are designed to address supporting instruction in
personal financial literacy, knowledge of markets and economics,
knowledge of higher education financing and repayment (e.g., college
savings and student loans), or other skills aimed at building personal
financial understanding and responsibility.
Note: For both priorities, the Department is sufficiently
interested in these topics that we may later seek to partner with
successful applicants to conduct research and evaluation.
Definitions: The definitions below are from 34 CFR 77.1(c).
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes.
Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Note: In developing logic models, applicants may want to use
resources such as the Regional Educational Laboratory Program's (REL
Pacific) Education Logic Model Application, available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/elm.asp, to help design their
logic models. Other sources include: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014025.pdf, https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/pacific/pdf/REL_2014007.pdf, and https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northeast/pdf/REL_2015057.pdf.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 and 20 U.S.C. 1070a-14.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 75 (except for
75.215 through 75.221), 77, 79, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98 and 99. (b) The
Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part
180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The regulations for this program in 34 CFR part 646. (e)
The Supplemental Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education (IHEs) only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: We intend to use an estimated
$313,849,000 for new SSS awards under this competition. Note: The
President's Budget for FY 2020 requested $950,000,000 for the
Administration's proposal to reform the Federal TRIO programs. The
actual level of funding and changes to the program, if any, depend on
final congressional action. However, we are inviting applications to
allow enough time to complete the grant process if Congress
appropriates funds for the Federal TRIO Programs. Contingent upon the
availability of funds and the quality of applications, we may make
additional awards in subsequent years from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $149,482-$1,595,544.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $311,977.
Maximum Award: The maximum award varies based on whether the
applicant is currently receiving an SSS grant, as well as the type of
project and number of students served.
For applicants not currently receiving an SSS Program grant, the
maximum awards are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum Amount
Type of Proposal *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regular SSS Proposal Serving a Minimum of 140 Student $253,032
Participants...........................................
Regular SSS Proposal Serving a Minimum of 100 Student 253,032
Participants who are Students with Disabilities........
English as a Second Language (ESL) SSS Proposal Serving 253,032
a Minimum of 140 Student Participants..................
Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) 253,032
and Health Science SSS Proposal Serving a Minimum of
120 Student Participants...............................
Teacher Preparation SSS Proposal Serving a Minimum of 253,032
140 Student Participants...............................
Veterans SSS Proposal Serving a Minimum of 120 Student 253,032
Participants...........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For applicants proposing to serve fewer than the minimum number of
student participants specified in the above table, the maximum award is
an amount equal to: $1,807 per student participant for Regular, ESL,
and Teacher Preparation proposals; $2,530 per student participant for
projects serving Students with Disabilities (SWD proposals); and $2,109
per student participant for STEM (including Health Science) and
Veterans proposals.
[[Page 68917]]
For applicants currently receiving an SSS program grant, the
maximum award amount is the greater of (a) $253,032 or (b) 100 percent
of the applicant's base award amount for FY 2019.
For any currently funded applicant that proposes to serve fewer
students than it served in FY 2019, the maximum award is the amount
that corresponds with the cost per participant previously established
for the project in FY 2019.
Estimated Number of New Awards: 1,069.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: IHEs or combinations of IHEs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: Section 402D(d)(4) of the HEA requires
that all successful applicants that use SSS Program funds to provide
grant aid to students pursuant to section 402D(d)(1) of the HEA must
provide matching funds, in cash, from non-Federal funds, in an amount
that is not less than 33 percent of the total amount of the SSS Program
funds used for this aid. This matching requirement does not apply to a
grant recipient that is an IHE eligible to receive funds under part A
or part B of title III or under title V of the HEA.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
4. Other: An applicant may submit multiple applications if each
separate application describes a project that will serve a different
campus or a different population (section 402A(c)(5) of the HEA).
Under section 402A(h)(1) of the HEA, the term ``different campus''
means a site of an IHE that--(a) is geographically apart from the main
campus of the institution; (b) is permanent in nature; and (c) offers
courses in educational programs leading to a degree, certificate, or
other recognized educational credential.
Under section 402A(h)(2) of the HEA, the term ``different
population'' means a group of individuals that an eligible entity
desires to serve through an SSS grant that is separate and distinct
from any other population that the entity has applied to serve using
Federal TRIO Program funds, or, while sharing some of the same needs as
another population that the eligible entity has applied to serve using
Federal TRIO Program funds, has distinct needs for specialized
services. To implement the requirement in section 402A(h)(2) of the HEA
for this competition, the Secretary is designating the populations to
be served as: Participants who meet the specific requirements for SSS
services, participants who are students with disabilities, participants
who need ESL services, participants receiving services in the STEM
fields, participants receiving Teacher Preparation Services, and
participants who have served in the armed forces. These different
populations need different types of services. Accordingly, the
Secretary has determined that projects serving these different
populations should be subject to different standards for the minimum
number of participants. An applicant may submit more than one
application as long as each application proposes to serve a different
population. For project types other than a regular SSS project, an
applicant must propose to serve 100 percent of the students in the
specific project type.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
3. Funding Restrictions: We specify unallowable costs in 34 CFR
646.31. We reference additional regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
Requirements concerning the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in the application package for this
program.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative, Part III of
the application, is where you, the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend
that you (1) limit the application narrative, which includes the budget
narrative, to no more than 65 pages and (2) use the following
standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins.
Double space all text in the application narrative, and
single space titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and
captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a 12-point font.
Use an easily readable font such as Times New Roman,
Courier, Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended 65-page limit does not apply to Part I, the
Application for Federal Assistance cover sheet (SF 424); Part II, the
Budget Information Summary form (ED Form 524); Part III-A, the SSS
Program Profile form; Part III-B, the one-page Project Abstract form;
or Part IV, the assurances and certifications. The recommended page
limit also does not apply to a table of contents, which you should
include in the application narrative. You must include your complete
response to the selection criteria in the application narrative.
We recommend that any application addressing the competitive
preference priorities include no more than three additional pages each
for priorities 1 and 2, if addressed.
Applications that do not follow the page limit and formatting
recommendations will not be penalized.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this competition
are from 34 CFR 646.21 and 34 CFR 75.210.
We will award up to 105 points to an application under the
selection criteria and up to 5 additional points to an application
under the competitive preference priorities, for a total score of up to
110 points. The maximum number of points available for each criterion
is indicated in parentheses.
(a) Need for the project (24 points). The Secretary evaluates the
need for an SSS project proposed at the applicant institution on the
basis of the extent to which the application contains clear evidence
of--
(1) A high number or percentage, or both, of students enrolled or
accepted for enrollment at the applicant institution who meet the
eligibility requirements of 34 CFR 646.3 (8 points);
(2) The academic and other problems that eligible students
encounter at the applicant institution (8 points); and
(3) The differences between eligible SSS students compared to an
appropriate group, based on the following indicators:
(i) Retention and graduation rates.
(ii) Grade point averages.
(iii) Graduate and professional school enrollment rates (four-year
colleges only).
[[Page 68918]]
(iv) Transfer rates from two-year to four-year institutions (two-
year colleges only) (8 points).
(b) Objectives (8 points). The Secretary evaluates the quality of
the applicant's proposed objectives in the following areas on the basis
of the extent to which they are both ambitious, as related to the need
data provided under paragraph (a) of this section, and attainable,
given the project's plan of operation, budget, and other resources.
(1) Retention in postsecondary education (3 points).
(2) In good academic standing at grantee institution (2 points).
(3) Two-year institutions only. (i) Certificate or degree
completion (1 point); and (ii) Certificate or degree completion and
transfer to a four-year institution (2 points).
(4) Four-year institutions only. Completion of a baccalaureate
degree (3 points).
(c) Plan of operation (30 points). The Secretary evaluates the
quality of the applicant's plan of operation on the basis of the
following:
(1) The plan to inform the institutional community (students,
faculty, and staff) of the goals, objectives, and services of the
project and the eligibility requirements for participation in the
project (3 points).
(2) The plan to identify, select, and retain project participants
with academic need (3 points).
(3) The plan for assessing each individual participant's need for
specific services and monitoring his or her academic progress at the
institution to ensure satisfactory academic progress (4 points).
(4) The plan to provide services that address the goals and
objectives of the project (10 points).
(5) The applicant's plan to ensure proper and efficient
administration of the project, including the organizational placement
of the project; the time commitment of key project staff; the specific
plans for financial management, student records management, and
personnel management; and, where appropriate, its plan for coordination
with other programs for disadvantaged students (10 points).
(d) Institutional commitment (16 points). The Secretary evaluates
the institutional commitment to the proposed project on the basis of
the extent to which the applicant has--
(1) Committed facilities, equipment, supplies, personnel, and other
resources to supplement the grant and enhance project services (6
points);
(2) Established administrative and academic policies that enhance
participants' retention at the institution and improve their chances of
graduating from the institution (6 points);
(3) Demonstrated a commitment to minimize the dependence on student
loans in developing financial aid packages for project participants by
committing institutional resources to the extent possible (2 points);
and
(4) Assured the full cooperation and support of the Admissions,
Student Aid, Registrar and data collection and analysis components of
the institution (2 points).
(e) Quality of personnel (9 points). To determine the quality of
personnel the applicant plans to use, the Secretary looks for
information that shows--
(1) The qualifications required of the project director, including
formal education and training in fields related to the objectives of
the project, and experience in designing, managing, or implementing SSS
or similar projects (3 points);
(2) The qualifications required of other personnel to be used in
the project, including formal education, training, and work experience
in fields related to the objectives of the project (3 points); and
(3) The quality of the applicant's plan for employing personnel who
have succeeded in overcoming barriers similar to those confronting the
project's target population (3 points).
(f) Budget (5 points). The Secretary evaluates the extent to which
the project budget is reasonable, cost-effective, and adequate to
support the project.
(g) Evaluation plan (8 points). The Secretary evaluates the quality
of the evaluation plan for the project on the basis of the extent to
which--
(1) The applicant's methods for evaluation--
(i) Are appropriate to the project and include both quantitative
and qualitative evaluation measures (2 points); and
(ii) Examine in specific and measurable ways, using appropriate
baseline data, the success of the project in improving academic
achievement, retention and graduation of project participants (2
points); and
(2) The applicant intends to use the results of an evaluation to
make programmatic changes based upon the results of project evaluation
(4 points).
(h) Quality of the project design (5 points). In determining the
quality of the design of the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a rationale (as
defined in this notice).
Note: Under the ``Objectives'' selection criterion in paragraph
(b) above, applicants must address the standardized objectives in 34
CFR 646.21(b)(1) through (4) related to the participants' academic
achievements, including retention, good academic standing,
graduation, and transfer rates. The graduation objective should be
measured by cohorts of students who become SSS Program participants
in each year of the project and should be compared to a relevant and
valid comparison group. The graduation, certificate, and transfer
rates for two-year institutions should be measured over a four-year
period and that of four-year institutions should be measured over a
six-year period.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
For this competition, a panel of non-Federal reviewers will review
each application in accordance with the selection criteria in 34 CFR
646.21, 34 CFR 75.210, and the competitive preference priorities. The
individual scores of the reviewers will be added and the sum divided by
the number of reviewers to determine the peer review score received in
the review process. Additionally, in accordance with 34 CFR 646.22, the
Secretary will award prior experience points to applicants that have
conducted an SSS Program project within the last three Federal
government fiscal years, based on their documented experience. Prior
experience points, if any, will be added to the application's averaged
reader score to determine the total score for each application. If
there are insufficient funds for all applications with the same total
scores, the Secretary will choose among the tied applications so as to
serve geographical areas that have been underserved by the SSS Program.
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition, the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate
[[Page 68919]]
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the applicant or
grantee is not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory
performance; has a financial or other management system that does not
meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not fulfilled the
conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2), we must make a judgment about
your integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before
we make an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about
you that is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred
to as the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
5. Performance Measures: The success of the SSS Program is measured
by the percentage of SSS participants that complete a program of
postsecondary education. The following performance measures have been
developed to track progress toward achieving program success:
(a) The percentage of first-time, full-time freshmen SSS Program
participants who are still enrolled at the beginning of the next
academic year or have earned a degree at a two-year grantee institution
or transferred from a two-year to a four-year institution.
(b) The percentage of first-time, full-time freshmen SSS
participants at four-year institutions who received a bachelor's degree
from the grantee institution (Note: The Department will calculate this
measure based both on 100 percent and 150 percent of normal completion
time).
(c) The percentage of first-time, full-time SSS participants at
two-year institutions who received an associate's degree and/or
transferred to a four-year institution (Note: The Department will
calculate this measure based both on 100 percent and 150 percent of
normal completion time).
(d) The cost per successful outcome.
All SSS Program grantees are required to submit an annual
performance report documenting the persistence and degree attainment of
their participants. Since students take different amounts of time to
complete their degrees, multiple years of performance report data are
needed to determine the degree completion rates of SSS Program
participants. The Department will aggregate the data provided in the
annual performance reports from all grantees to determine the overall
program accomplishment level.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
[[Page 68920]]
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Robert L. King,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2019-27115 Filed 12-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P