[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68407-68409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27027]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-883]


Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of 
Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 
and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines 
that sales of certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) 
from the Republic of Korea (Korea) were made at less than normal value 
during the period of review (POR) October 1, 2017 through September 30, 
2018. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary 
results.

DATES: Applicable December 16, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Genevieve Coen, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3251.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 11, 2018, Commerce initiated the administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on hot-rolled steel from Korea in 
accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act).\1\ This

[[Page 68408]]

review covers one mandatory respondent, Hyundai Steel Company 
(Hyundai). The remaining companies, POSCO and POSCO Daewoo Corporation 
(collectively, POSCO), were not selected for individual examination and 
remain subject to this administrative review.\2\ Commerce exercised its 
discretion to toll all deadlines affected by the partial federal 
government closure from December 22, 2018 through the resumption of 
operations on January 29, 2019, resulting in a revised deadline for 
these preliminary results.\3\ Additionally, Commerce exercised its 
discretion to extend the deadline for the preliminary results until 
December 10, 2019.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 83 FR 63615 (December 11, 2018).
    \2\ Commerce previously determined that these companies are 
affiliated and should be treated as a single entity. In the absence 
of information indicating that we should reevaluate this finding, we 
are treating POSCO and POSCO Daewoo Corporation as a single entity. 
See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of 
Korea: Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than 
Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 15228 
(March 22, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 
(PDM) at 6-8, unchanged in Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 
from the Republic of Korea: Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value, 81 FR 53419 (August 12, 2016); see also Certain 
Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2016-
2017, 83 FR 56821 (November 14, 2018), and accompanying PDM at 8-9, 
unchanged in Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2016-2017, 84 FR 32720 (July 9, 2019), and accompanying IDM 
at 1.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Partial Shutdown 
of the Federal Government,'' dated January 28, 2019. All deadlines 
in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 40 days.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 
from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2017-2018,'' 
dated July 18, 2019; see also Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel 
Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Second Extension of 
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 2017-2018,'' dated October 16, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from Australia, 
Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, the Republic 
of Turkey, and the United Kingdom: Amended Final Affirmative 
Antidumping Determinations for Australia, the Republic of Korea, and 
the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 67962 
(October 3, 2016) (Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The products covered by this Order are certain hot-rolled steel 
products. For a full description of the scope, see the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-
Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea,'' dated 
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    On January 11, 2019, POSCO certified it had no reviewable entries, 
exports, or sales of subject merchandise to the United States during 
the POR.\7\ To confirm POSCO's no-shipment claims, Commerce issued a 
no-shipment inquiry to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and has 
received no information that contradicts POSCO's no shipment claims.\8\ 
Therefore, we preliminarily determine that POSCO did not have any 
shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. Consistent with 
Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to 
these companies, but, rather, will complete the review and issue 
instructions based on the final results.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See POSCO's Letter, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 
from South Korea, Case No. A-580-883: No Shipment Letter,'' dated 
January 11, 2019.
    \8\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 
from the Republic of Korea: POSCO's No Shipments Inquiry 
Instructions,'' dated December 5, 2019.
    \9\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No 
Shipments; 2012-2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged 
in Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No 
Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 51306, 
51307 (August 28, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying 
these preliminary results, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A 
list of the topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
included as an appendix to this notice. The Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and 
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Rates for Non-Examined Companies

    The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the 
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for 
individual examination when Commerce limits its examination in an 
administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. 
Generally, Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market 
economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for 
companies which were not selected for individual examination in an 
administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-
others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted average of 
the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for 
exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero 
or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the 
basis of facts available{time} .''
    In this review, we have preliminarily calculated a weighted-average 
dumping margin for Hyundai that is not zero, de minimis, or determined 
entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, we have 
preliminarily assigned to the companies not individually examined in 
this review a margin of 0.94 percent, which is the calculated weighted-
average dumping margin for Hyundai.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The non-examined companies subject to this review are: 
POSCO and POSCO Daewoo Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Review

    We preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average 
dumping margin exists for the period October 1, 2017 through September 
30, 2018:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyundai Steel Company.......................................        0.94
POSCO/POSCO Daewoo Corporation..............................        0.94
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these 
preliminary results of review to interested parties within five days of 
the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.224(b). Commerce will establish a deadline for interested parties 
to submit case briefs and rebuttal briefs at a later date.\11\ Parties 
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 
encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 
(2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\12\ Case and

[[Page 68409]]

rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS \13\ and must be served on 
interested parties.\14\ Executive summaries should be limited to five 
pages total, including footnotes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and 351.309(d)(1).
    \12\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
    \13\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303.
    \14\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via 
Commerce's electronic records system, ACCESS. An electronically filed 
request must be received successfully in its entirety by 5:00 p.m. 
Eastern Time within 30 days of the date of publication of this 
notice.\15\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be 
limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If 
a request for a hearing is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing 
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, 
Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\16\ Parties 
should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days 
before the scheduled date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \16\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative 
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in 
any case or rebuttal briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of 
publication of this notice, unless extended.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of this administrative review, Commerce shall 
determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries. If Hyundai's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de 
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this 
review, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value 
of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate 
calculated in the final results of this review is not zero or de 
minimis. If Hyundai's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties. The final results of this review 
shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries 
of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for 
future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' practice, 
for entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Hyundai 
for which it did not know that the merchandise was destined to the 
United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate those entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyundai and 
POSCO in the final results of review will be equal to the weighted-
average dumping margin established in the final results of this 
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or 
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of 
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this 
proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a 
firm covered in this review or the original investigation but the 
producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the 
producer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 6.05 percent, the all-others 
rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled 
antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This administrative review and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 9, 2019.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments
V. Affiliation
VI. Particular Market Situation
VII. Discussion of the Methodology
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2019-27027 Filed 12-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P