[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48990-48991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2018-0028; Notice 1]


Mobility Ventures, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of 
Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Mobility Ventures, LLC (Mobility), a wholly owned subsidiary 
of AM General, LLC, has determined that certain model year (MY) 2015-
2016 Mobility Ventures MV-1 motor vehicles do not fully comply with 
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 126, Electronic 
Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles. Mobility filed a 
noncompliance report dated February 14, 2018. Mobility subsequently 
petitioned NHTSA on February 20, 2018, for a decision that the subject 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. 
This document announces receipt of Mobility's petition.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is October 17, 
2019.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data, 
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the 
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be 
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. 
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging 
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater 
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of 
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in 
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish 
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were 
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the 
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change 
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of 
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the 
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials 
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be 
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will 
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority 
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials 
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and 
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at 
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for 
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this petition is shown 
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a 
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: Mobility has determined that certain MY 2015-2016 
Mobility MV-1 motor vehicles do not fully comply with the requirements 
of paragraph S5.3.3 of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability Control 
Systems for Light Vehicles (49 CFR 571.126). Mobility filed a 
noncompliance report dated February 14, 2018, pursuant to CFR part 573, 
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Mobility 
subsequently petitioned NHTSA on February 20, 2018, pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, for an exemption from 
the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on 
the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to 
motor vehicle safety.
    This notice of receipt of their petition is published under 49 
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or 
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of this petition.

[[Page 48991]]

    II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 977 MY 2015-2016 Mobility 
Ventures MV-1 vehicles, manufactured between December 22, 2014, and 
August 24, 2015, are potentially involved.
    III. Noncompliance: Mobility explains that the previous model year 
vehicles (2011-2014) were equipped with a 4.6L V8 powertrain with 6 
ignition states and the engine was changed in model years (2015-2016) 
to a 3.7L V6 powertrain with 11 ignition states. Following the change, 
the supplier of the Electronic Brake Control Module (EBCM) incorrectly 
programmed the EBCM memory chip to recognize the possible power mode 
states. This issue led to the telltale warning lamp not illuminating to 
indicate an Electronic Stability Control (ESC) fault under certain 
starting conditions, thus, not complying with paragraph S5.3.3 of FMVSS 
No. 126.
    IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S5.3.3 of FMVSS No. 126, include 
the requirements relevant to this petition. As of September 1, 2011, 
except as provided in paragraphs S5.3.4, S5.3.5, S5.3.8, and S5.3.10, 
the ESC malfunction telltale must illuminate only when a malfunction of 
the ESC system exists and must remain continuously illuminated under 
the conditions specified in paragraph S5.3 for as long as the 
malfunction exists (unless the ``ESC malfunction'' and ``ESC Off'' 
telltale are combined in a two-part telltale and the ``ESC Off'' 
telltale is illuminated), whenever the ignition locking system is in 
the ``On'' (``Run'') position.
    V. Summary of Petition: Mobility described the subject 
noncompliance and stated its belief that the noncompliance is 
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
    In support of its petition, Mobility submitted the following 
reasoning:
    1. Mobility submits that this nonconformity is inconsequential to 
vehicle safety. Mobility believes that this is a de minimis 
noncompliance with paragraph S5.3.3 of FMVSS No. 126 because the 
Traction Control Off warning lamp will illuminate when a fault is 
detected, either immediately if the Operator pauses with the key in the 
``ignition on'' state before starting the vehicle, or upon driving if 
the vehicle is started without pausing in the ``ignition on'' state. 
While the correct telltale warning lamp does not illuminate, Operators 
are still alerted to the possibility of a malfunction with the ESC 
system by the illumination of the Traction Control Off warning lamp.
    2. Notwithstanding the lack of a safety risk, Mobility and BWI (the 
EBCM Supplier) are developing a plug-and play re-flashing tool that 
will permit uploading of revised software into the current EBCM 
installed in the vehicle. This revised software correctly tracks the 
ignition sequences required by FMVSS No. 126, and fully corrects the 
observed noncompliance. Re-flashing is the preferred repair-solution. 
Currently the only available way to update the EBCM's software is to 
remove and replace the entire electrical and hydraulic unit with one 
that has had its software updated. Mobility is preparing to implement 
this re-flashing solution as required.
    3. Mobility has notified its dealers to stop sale of any affected 
MV-1 vehicles that may be in their dealer inventory (new, used or 
demonstrator) until the EBCM software is updated. While Mobility does 
not believe that this technical noncompliance poses a safety risk, 
Mobility Ventures authorized dealers will perform EBCM unit replacement 
or re-flashing (when available) free-of-charge when vehicle owners 
present to Dealers for service.
    4. Mobility is not aware of any issues with the performance of the 
ESC system. As of February 2018, Mobility has not received any warranty 
claims, field reports, or information about injuries or crashes related 
to the performance of the ESC.
    Mobility concluded by expressing the belief that the subject 
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, 
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the 
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    Mobility's complete petition and all supporting documents are 
available by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) 
website at: https://www.regulations.gov and by following the online 
search instructions to locate the docket number listed in the heading 
of this notice.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a 
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers 
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, 
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance 
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on 
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that Mobility no 
longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance 
existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve 
vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer 
for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate 
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after 
Mobility notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2019-20006 Filed 9-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P