[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39970-39974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17234]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 138

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0392]
RIN 1625-AC53


Consumer Price Index Adjustments of Oil Pollution Act of 1990 
Limits of Liability--Vessels, Deepwater Ports and Onshore Facilities

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule to adjust the 
limits of liability for vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore 
facilities under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90), as amended, to 
reflect the increase in the Consumer Price Index since 2015. These 
regulatory inflation increases to the limits of liability are required 
by OPA 90 and are necessary to preserve the deterrent effect and 
``polluter pays'' principle embodied in the Act. This update promotes 
the Coast Guard's missions of maritime safety and stewardship.

DATES: This final rule is effective on November 12, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this rule are available in our online

[[Page 39971]]

docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by entering 
``USCG-2019-0392'' in the search field and following the website's 
instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document 
call or email Benjamin White, Coast Guard; telephone (202) 795-6066, 
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents for Preamble

I.Abbreviations
II. Basis and Purpose, and Regulatory History
III. Background and Justification for Final Rule
IV. Calculation for the Adjustment
V. Regulatory Analyses
    A. Regulatory Planning and Review
    B. Small Entities
    C. Assistance for Small Entities
    D. Collection of Information
    E. Federalism
    F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    G. Taking of Private Property
    H. Civil Justice Reform
    I. Protection of Children
    J. Indian Tribal Governments
    K. Energy Effects
    L. Technical Standards
    M. Environment

I. Abbreviations

BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics
BOEM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
CPI Consumer Price Index
CPI-U Consumer Price Index--All Urban Consumers, Not Seasonally 
Adjusted, U.S. City Average, All Items, 1982-84 = 100
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OPA90 Oil Pollution Act of 1990
U.S.C. United States Code
Sec.  Section

II. Basis and Purpose, and Regulatory History

    Under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) (33 U.S.C. 2701, et 
seq.), the responsible parties for any vessel (other than a public 
vessel) or facility from which oil is discharged, or which poses a 
substantial threat of discharge of oil, into or upon the navigable 
waters or the adjoining shorelines or the exclusive economic zone of 
the United States are strictly liable, jointly and severally, under 33 
U.S.C. 2702 (a) and (b), for the removal costs and damages that result 
from such incident. Under 33 U.S.C. 2704 (a), the responsible parties' 
liability with respect to OPA 90 and any one incident is limited, 
subject to certain exceptions specified in 33 U.S.C. 2704 (c).
    In the instances when a limit of liability applies, the Oil Spill 
Liability Trust Fund (``the Fund'') is available to compensate the OPA 
90 removal costs and damages incurred by the responsible parties and 
third-party claimants in excess of the applicable limit of liability. 
The statutory limits of liability for vessels and three types of 
facilities are set forth in OPA 90: (1) Onshore facilities, (2) 
deepwater ports, and (3) offshore facilities other than deepwater 
ports. In addition, to prevent the real value of the OPA 90 statutory 
limits of liability from depreciating over time as a result of 
inflation, and to preserve the ``polluter pays'' principle, OPA 90 
requires that the limits of liability be adjusted ``not less than every 
3 years'' to reflect significant increases in the Consumer Price Index 
(CPI).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 2704(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Coast Guard is responsible for adjusting the limits of 
liability for vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore facilities. The 
Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) 
is responsible for adjusting the limits of liability for offshore 
facilities. Regarding vessels and deepwater ports, the Coast Guard 
adjusted the limits of liability in 2009 (74 FR 31357) \2\ and in 2015 
(80 FR 72342). Regarding onshore facilities, USCG adjusted the limits 
of liability only once, in 2015 (80 FR 72342), after the President 
issued Executive Order 13638, which restated and simplified the 
delegations in Executive Order 12777, section 4, and vested the 
authority to make CPI adjustments to the onshore facility statutory 
limit of liability in ``the Secretary of the Department in which the 
Coast Guard is operating.'' The Secretary of the Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS) delegated that authority to the Coast Guard. Regarding 
offshore facilities, BOEM published a final rule and adjusted the 
limits of liability for offshore facilities in 2018 (83 FR 2540) from 
$133,650,000 to $137,659,500.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The 2009 interim rule was adopted without change as a final 
rule in 2010 (75 FR 750).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Background and Justification for Final Rule

    The Coast Guard is promulgating this rule pursuant to the 
provisions of Title I of OPA, Executive Order 12777, as amended, and 
Coast Guard regulations in Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations 
(CFR) part 138, subpart B--OPA 90 Limits of Liability (Vessels, 
Deepwater Ports and Onshore Facilities). Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the 
Coast Guard has good cause for issuing this final rule without notice 
or comment as providing notice and comment is unnecessary. Prior notice 
and comment is ``unnecessary'' when the change is minor or merely 
technical.\3\ Prior notice and comment is also unnecessary when there 
is no need to allow ``affected parties an opportunity to participate in 
agency decision making early in the process, when the agency is more 
likely to consider alternative ideas,'' \4\ and where Congress requires 
an agency to perform a non-discretionary act, and where no extent of 
notice or commentary could have altered the obligation of the agency. 
In this instance, a proposed rule is unnecessary because the adjustment 
in the limit of liability is mandated by statute, and is therefore non-
discretionary for the Coast Guard. Furthermore, the methodology for 
determining the amount is defined in the Coast Guard's regulations, and 
the regulations in 33 CFR 138.240(a) provide that inflation adjustments 
to the limits of liability for vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore 
facilities will be implemented through final rulemaking.\5\ The full 
legislative and regulatory history for the OPA 90 limit of liability 
inflation adjustments can be found in the rulemaking preamble for the 
last inflation adjustment in the final rule found at 80 FR 72342.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Northern Arapahoe Tribe v. Hodel, 808 F.2d 741, 751 (10th 
Cir. 1987).
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ In the NPRM for the 2015 adjustment, titled Consumer Price 
Index Adjustments of Oil Pollution Act of 1990 Limits of Liability-
Vessels, Deepwater Ports and Onshore Facilities, the Coast Guard 
proposed a simplified regulatory procedure for making future 
inflation updates to the OPA 90 limits of liability. Under that 
procedure in new 33 CFR 138.240(a), the Director of NPFC publishes 
the inflation-adjusted limits of liability in the Federal Register 
as final rule amendments to 33 CFR 138.230. Further, the preamble of 
that NPRM stated that ``[b]ecause the adjustment methodology was 
established by the CPI-1 Rule, and the simplified [regulatory] 
procedure will be established by this rulemaking, publication of an 
NPRM would not be necessary for these future mandated inflation 
adjustments.'' 79 FR 49206 at 49211; August 19, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Calculation for the Adjustment

    The Coast Guard is issuing this final rule to update the OPA 90 
limits of liability for vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore 
facilities, as set forth in 33 CFR part 138, subpart B, to reflect 
significant increases in the CPI since the limits were last adjusted. 
OPA 90 requires adjustments to the limits of liability not less than 
every 3 years to reflect significant increases in the CPI. The method 
for calculating these adjustments is set forth in 33 CFR 138.240.
    This final rule provides these periodic inflation adjustments to 
the limits of liability to reflect changes in the CPI since the limits 
were last adjusted for inflation in 2015 (80 FR 72342). As provided in 
33 CFR 138.240, we

[[Page 39972]]

calculate limit of liability adjustments, using the Consumer Price 
Index--All Urban Consumers, Not Seasonally Adjusted, U.S. City Average, 
All Items, 1982-84=100 (CPI-U) values published by the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics (BLS), as follows--
    1. Formula to calculate the percent change in the Annual CPI-U: 
Percent change in the Annual CPI-U = [(Annual CPI-U for current period 
- Annual CPI-U for previous period) / Annual CPI-U for previous period] 
x 100, then rounded to one decimal place.
    2. Formula to derive the new limit of liability, applying the 
percent change in the Annual CPI-U: New Limit of Liability = Previous 
Limit of Liability + (Previous Limit of Liability x Percent Change in 
CPI), then rounded to the closest $100.
    For this update, we used the 2018 Annual CPI-U value of 251.107 as 
the ``current period'' value, which is the most recent Annual CPI-U 
published by the BLS.\6\ The Coast Guard used the 2014 Annual CPI-U 
value of 236.736 as the ``previous period'' value, which was the Annual 
CPI-U used as the ``current period'' value when the limits of liability 
were last adjusted in 2015. Applying the formula in Item 1 above, we 
have determined that there was a 6.1 percent increase in the Annual 
CPI-U since the OPA 90 limits of liability for vessels, deepwater 
ports, and onshore facilities were last adjusted. Table 1 below shows 
the previous and new limits of liability derived by applying the 
percent increase using the formula in Item 2 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ https://www.bls.gov/cpi/tables/supplemental-files/historical-cpi-u-201905.pdf.

                                    Table 1--CPI-Adjusted Limits of Liability
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Percent
                                                                        increase in
             Source category                  Previous limit  of        the annual    New CPI-adjusted  limit of
                                                   liability               CPI-U               liability
                                                                         (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Sec.   138.230(a) Vessels
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The OPA 90 limits of liability for    ..........................  ..............  ..........................
 tank vessels, other than edible oil
 tank vessels and oil spill response
 vessels, are--.
(i) For a single-hull tank vessel         The greater of $3,500 per              6.1  The greater of $3,700 per
 greater than 3,000 gross tons \7\.        gross ton or $25,845,600.                   gross ton or $27,422,200.
(ii) For a tank vessel greater than       The greater of $2,200 per              6.1  The greater of $2,300 per
 3,000 gross tons, other than a single-    gross ton or $18,796,800.                   gross ton or $19,943,400.
 hull tank vessel.
(iii) For a single-hull tank vessel less  The greater of $3,500 per              6.1  The greater of $3,700 per
 than or equal to 3,000 gross tons.        gross ton or $7,048,800.                    gross ton or $7,478,800.
(iv) For a tank vessel less than or       The greater of $2,200 per              6.1  The greater of $2,300 per
 equal to 3,000 gross tons, other than a   gross ton or $4,699,200.                    gross ton or $4,985,900.
 single-hull tank vessel.
(2) The OPA 90 limits of liability for    The greater of $1,100 per              6.1  The greater of $1,200 per
 any vessel other than a vessel listed     gross ton or $939,800.                      gross ton or $997,100.
 in subparagraph (a)(1) of Sec.
 138.230, including for any edible oil
 tank vessel and any oil spill response,
 vessel, are--.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Sec.   138.230(b) Deepwater ports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The OPA 90 limit of liability for     $633,850,000..............             6.1  $672,514,900.
 any deepwater port, including for any
 component pipelines, other than a
 deepwater port listed in subparagraph
 (b)(2) of Sec.   138.230, is--.
(2) The OPA 90 limits of liability for    ..........................  ..............  ..........................
 deepwater ports with limits of
 liability established by regulation
 under OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(d)(2)),
 including for any component pipelines,
 are--.
(i) For the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port   $96,366,600...............             6.1  $102,245,000.
 (LOOP).
(ii) [Reserved].........................  N/A.......................             N/A  N/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Sec.   138.230(c) Onshore facilities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OPA 90 limit of liability for         $633,850,000..............             6.1  $672,514,900.
 onshore facilities, including, but not
 limited to, any motor vehicle, rolling
 stock or onshore pipeline, is--.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Regulatory Analyses
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ As of January 1, 2015, tank vessels not equipped with a 
double hull can no longer operate on waters subject to the 
jurisdiction of the United States, including the Exclusive Economic 
Zone, carrying oil in bulk as cargo or cargo residue; and there are 
no waivers or extensions of the deadline. However, OPA 90 continues 
to specify limits of liability for single-hull tank vessels. The 
Coast Guard, therefore, continues to adjust those limits of 
liability for inflation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. A summary of our analyses based 
on these statutes or Executive orders follows.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) and 13563 
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess 
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. 
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling

[[Page 39973]]

Regulatory Costs) directs agencies to reduce regulation and control 
regulatory costs and provides that ``for every one new regulation 
issued, at least two prior regulations be identified for elimination, 
and that the cost of planned regulations be prudently managed and 
controlled through a budgeting process.''
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this 
rule a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. Because this rule is 
not a significant regulatory action, this rule is exempt from the 
requirements of Executive Order 13771. See the OMB Memorandum titled 
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, titled `Reducing 
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017). A 
regulatory analysis (RA) follows.
    As was the case with the BOEM rulemaking increasing the limits of 
liability for offshore facilities, this final rule is an update to the 
limit of liability for vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore facilities 
under OPA 90.\8\ This rule does not increase the regulatory burden on 
regulated entities when measured in constant or real dollars. This 
final rule simply maintains the value of the limit of liability set by 
OPA 90 by updating the limit of liability for inflation, as required by 
OPA 90 in 33 U.S.C. 2704(d)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Documents from the BOEM rulemaking are available at https://www.regulations.gov by entering ``BOEM-2017-0048'' in the search 
field and following the website's instructions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Regulatory Cost
    This final rule increases the limits of liability under OPA 90 for 
vessels, deepwater ports, and onshore facilities by 6.1 percent. The 
Coast Guard does not expect Certificate of Financial Responsibility 
guarantor insurance premiums for vessels to increase as a result of 
this rule. This final rule will only affect vessels, deepwater ports, 
and onshore facilities that have an OPA 90 incident that exceeds their 
existing limit of liability. The Coast Guard estimates that this final 
rule will affect, at most, three vessels per year. We estimate that the 
rule could also affect one deepwater port and one onshore facility over 
a 10-year period. In such a case, the maximum amount of additional 
liability will represent a maintenance of the value of the limits of 
liability set by OPA 90.
Regulatory Benefit
    This rulemaking ensures that the OPA 90 limits of liability keep 
pace with inflation as required by OPA 90 (33 U.S.C. 2704(d)(4)). This 
final rule requires responsible parties to internalize inflation, 
thereby benefitting the public, because the appropriate amount of 
removal costs and damages are borne by the responsible party. The 
liability risk will not shift from the responsible party to the public 
and the Fund. This helps preserve the ``polluter pays'' principle as 
intended by Congress and preserves the Fund for its other authorized 
uses. Absent CPI adjustments, a responsible party gains an advantage 
not intended by OPA 90. Without inflation incorporated into the 
determination of the applicable limit of liability, the responsible 
party ultimately pays a reduced percentage of the total incident costs. 
Hence, this final rule ensures that the limits of liability are 
adjusted according to inflation and remain constant over time.

B. Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, we have 
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply when notice and 
comment rulemaking is not required. This rule is not preceded by a 
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). Therefore, it is exempt from the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). 
Furthermore, this rulemaking is statutorily mandated. Pursuant to 
established procedure in 33 CFR 138.240(a), an NPRM is unnecessary. 
Therefore, the Coast Guard has determined that a Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis does not apply to this rulemaking.

C. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104-121, we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate 
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard 
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain 
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247).

D. Collection of Information

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) requires 
that the Coast Guard consider the impact of paperwork and other 
information collection burdens imposed on the public. The Coast Guard 
had determined that there is no new requirement for information 
collection associated with this final rule.

E. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132 
(Federalism) if it has a substantial direct effect on States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    This final rule makes necessary adjustments to the OPA 90 limits of 
liability to reflect significant increases in the CPI. Nothing in this 
final rule affects the preservation of State authorities under 33 
U.S.C. 2718, including the authority of any State to impose additional 
liability or financial responsibility requirements with respect to 
discharges of oil within such State. Therefore, this final rule has no 
implications for federalism.
    The Coast Guard recognizes the key role that State and local 
governments may have in making regulatory determinations. Additionally, 
for rules with federalism implications and preemptive effect, Executive 
Order 13132 specifically directs agencies to consult with State and 
local governments during the rulemaking process. The Coast Guard 
invites anyone who believes this rule has implications for federalism 
under Executive Order 13132 to contact the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION section of this preamble.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions

[[Page 39974]]

that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal 
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100 million 
(adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Although this rule 
will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

G. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 (Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights).

H. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform), to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

I. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045 (Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks). This 
rule is not an economically significant rule and will not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might 
disproportionately affect children.

J. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments), 
because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

K. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13211 
(Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use). We have determined that it is not a 
``significant energy action'' under that order because it is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is 
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, 
distribution, or use of energy.

L. Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act, codified as a 
note to 15 U.S.C. 272, directs agencies to use voluntary consensus 
standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides 
Congress, through OMB, with an explanation of why using these standards 
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. 
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., 
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test 
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) 
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

M. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made 
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This final rule is categorically 
excluded under paragraph L53 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction 
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. Paragraph L53 pertains to 
congressionally mandated regulations designed to improve or protect the 
environment. This rule adjusts the limits of liability for vessels, 
deepwater ports, and onshore facilities to reflect significant 
increases in the CPI using the methodology established in 33 CFR 
138.40(a) and mandated by statute. The Coast Guard certifies this rule 
will not have significant environmental impacts.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 138

    Hazardous materials transportation, Insurance, Oil pollution, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Surety bonds, Vessels, Water 
pollution control.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 138 as follows:

PART 138--FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR WATER POLLUTION (VESSELS) 
AND OPA 90 LIMITS OF LIABILITY (VESSELS, DEEPWATER PORTS AND 
ONSHORE FACILITIES)

0
1. The authority citation for part 138 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2704, 2716, 2716a; 42 U.S.C. 9608, 9609; 6 
U.S.C. 552; E.O. 12580, Sec. 7(b), 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193; E.O. 
12777, Secs. 4 and 5, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351, as amended by E.O. 
13286, Sec. 89, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p. 166, and by E.O. 13638, Sec. 
1, 3 CFR, 2014 Comp., p.227; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation Nos. 0170.1 and 5110, Revision 01. Section 138.30 also 
issued under the authority of 46 U.S.C. 2103 and 14302.

Subpart B--OPA 90 Limits of Liability (Vessels, Deepwater Ports and 
Onshore Facilities)


Sec.  138.230  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  138.230 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), remove the text ``$3,500 per gross ton or 
$25,845,600'' and add, in its place, the text ``$3,700 per gross ton or 
$27,422,200'';
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1)(ii), remove the text ``$2,200 per gross ton or 
$18,796,800'' and add, in its place, the text ``$2,300 per gross ton or 
$19,943,400'';
0
c. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii), remove the text ``$3,500 per gross ton or 
$7,048,800'' and add, in its place, the text ``$3,700 per gross ton or 
$7,478,800'';
0
d. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv), remove the text ``$2,200 per gross ton or 
$4,699,200'' and add, in its place, the text ``$2,300 per gross ton or 
$4,985,900'';
0
e. In paragraph (a)(2), remove the text ``$1,100 per gross ton or 
$939,800'' and add, in its place, the text ``$1,200 per gross ton or 
$997,100'';
0
f. In paragraph (b)(1) remove the text ``$633,850,000'' and add, in its 
place, the text ``$672,514,900'';
0
g. In paragraph (b)(2)(i), remove the text ``$96,366,000'' and add, in 
its place, the text ``$102,245,000''; and
0
h. In paragraph (c), remove the text ``$633,850,000'' and add, in its 
place, the text ``$672,514,900''.

    Dated: July 22, 2019.
Thomas G. Allan,
Assistant Commandant for Resources, United States Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2019-17234 Filed 8-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P