[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32185-32187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60Day-19-19BHC; Docket No. CDC-19-0055]


Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice with comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part 
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the 
utility of government information, invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies the opportunity to comment on a proposed and/or 
continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on a proposed 
information collection project titled EVALUATION OF THE DP18-1815 
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROGRAM: IMPROVING THE HEALTH OF AMERICANS 
THROUGH PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES AND HEART DISEASE AND 
STROKE. The purpose of data collection is to determine CDC-funded 
recipients' progress towards using DP18-1815 funds to implement 
evidence-based strategies, and to determine how those efforts are 
contributing to state level and health system level changes to support 
prevention and management of diabetes and heart disease.

DATES: CDC must receive written comments on or before September 3, 
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2019-
0055 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection Review 
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road 
NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and Docket Number. CDC will post, without change, all relevant comments 
to Regulations.gov.
    Please note: Submit all comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the 
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan 
and instruments, contact Jeffrey M. Zirger, Information Collection 
Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton 
Road NE, MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires 
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new 
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of 
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information 
collection before submitting the collection to the OMB for approval. To 
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a 
proposed data collection as described below.
    The OMB is particularly interested in comments that will help:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of 
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the 
methodology and assumptions used;
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those 
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submissions of responses.
    5. Assess information collection costs.

Proposed Project

    Evaluation of the DP18-1815 Cooperative Agreement Program: 
Improving the Health of Americans Through Prevention and Management of 
Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke--New--National Center for Chronic 
Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention (CDC).

[[Page 32186]]

Background and Brief Description

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Division of 
Diabetes Translation (DDT) and Division for Heart Disease and Stroke 
Prevention (DHDSP) are submitting this new three year information 
collection request (ICR) for an evaluation of the recently launched 
five-year Cooperative Agreement program CDC-RFA-DP18-1815PPHF18: 
Improving the Health of Americans Through Prevention and Management of 
Diabetes and Heart Disease and Stroke, hereafter referred to as 
``1815''. This cooperative agreement funds all 50 State Health 
Departments and the Washington, DC health department (hereafter 
referred to as ``HD recipients'') to support investments in 
implementing evidence-based strategies to prevent and manage 
cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes in high-burden populations/
communities within each state and the District of Columbia. High burden 
populations/communities are those affected disproportionately by high 
blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, or prediabetes due to 
socioeconomic or other characteristics, including access to care, poor 
quality of care, or low income. The 1815 program is a collaboration 
between DDT and DHDSP and is structured into two program categories 
aligning with each Division: Category A focuses on diabetes management 
and Type 2 diabetes prevention; Category B focuses on CVD prevention 
and management.
    This cooperative agreement is a substantial investment of federal 
funds. DDT and DHDSP are responsible for the stewardship of these 
funds, and they must be able to demonstrate the types of interventions 
being implemented and what is being accomplished through the use of 
these funds. Thus, throughout the five-year cooperative agreement 
period, CDC will work with HD recipients to track the implementation of 
the cooperative agreement strategies and evaluate program processes and 
outcomes. In order to collect this information, CDC has designed four 
overarching components: (1) Category A rapid evaluation of DSMES and 
National DPP partner sites, (2) Category B case studies, (3) Category B 
cost study, and (4) Category A and B recipient-led evaluations. Each 
component consists of data collection mechanisms and tools that are 
designed to capture the most relevant information needed to inform the 
evaluation effort while placing minimum burden on respondents. 
Respondents will include HD recipients, as well as select HD recipient 
partner sites, which are organizations that HD recipients are 
partnering with in the implementation of the 1815 strategies.
    The evaluation of cooperative agreement strategies and activities 
conducted by DDT and DHDSP will determine the efficiency, 
effectiveness, impact and sustainability of 1815-funded strategies in 
the promotion, prevention, and management of diabetes and heart disease 
and help identify promising practices that can be replicated and scaled 
to better improve health outcomes. In addition, evaluation plays a 
critical role in organizational learning, program planning, decision-
making, and measurement of the 1815 strategies. As an action-oriented 
process, the evaluation will serve to identify programs that have 
positive outcomes, identify those that may need additional technical 
assistance support, and highlight the specific activities that make the 
biggest contribution to improving diabetes and cardiovascular disease 
prevention and management efforts. Without collection of new evaluative 
data, CDC will not be able to capture critical information needed to 
continuously improve programmatic efforts and clearly demonstrate the 
use of federal funds.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
      Type of respondents           Form name        Number of     responses per  Average burden   Total burden
                                                    respondents     respondent     per response     (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Category A Site-Level Rapid Evaluation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD recipient staff............  National DPP                  51               1           30/60             8.5
                                 Partner Site-
                                 Level Rapid
                                 Evaluation Site
                                 Nomination Form.
HD recipient staff............  DSMES Partner                 51               1           30/60             8.5
                                 Site-Level
                                 Rapid
                                 Evaluation Site
                                 Nomination Form.
DSMES partner site staff......  DSMES Rapid                   14               1               2              28
                                 Evaluation
                                 Interview
                                 Guide--Program/
                                 Quality
                                 Coordinator.
DSMES partner site staff......  DSMES Rapid                   28               1               2              56
                                 Evaluation
                                 Interview
                                 Guide--Paraprof
                                 essional.
DSMES partner site staff......  DSMES Rapid                   28               1               2              56
                                 Evaluation
                                 Interview
                                 Guide--Health
                                 Professional.
DSMES partner site staff......  DSMES Rapid                  510               1               1             340
                                 Evaluation
                                 Survey
                                 Questionnaire.
National DPP partner site       National DPP                  14               1               2              28
 staff.                          Rapid
                                 Evaluation
                                 Interview
                                 Guide--Program
                                 Coordinator.
National DPP partner site       National DPP                  28               1               2              56
 staff.                          Rapid
                                 Evaluation
                                 Interview
                                 Guide--Lifestyl
                                 e Coach.
National DPP partner site       National DPP                 510               1               1             340
 staff.                          Rapid
                                 Evaluation
                                 Survey
                                 Questionnaire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Category B Case Study--Site-Level Interviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partner site staff............  CQM Partner Site-             45               1             1.5            22.5
                                 Level Interview
                                 Guide.
Partner site staff............  TBC Partner Site-             24               1             1.5              12
                                 Level Interview
                                 Guide.
Partner site staff............  MTM Partner Site-             21               1             1.5            10.5
                                 Level Interview
                                 Guide.

[[Page 32187]]

 
Partner site staff............  CCL Partner Site-             45               1             1.5            22.5
                                 Level Interview
                                 Guide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Category B Case Study--SHD-Level Interview
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD recipient staff............  CQM HD Recipient              25               1               2            33.5
                                 Interview Guide.
HD recipient staff............  TBC HD Recipient              13               1               2            17.5
                                 Interview Guide.
HD recipient staff............  MTM HD Recipient              12               1               2              16
                                 Interview Guide.
HD recipient staff............  CCL HD Recipient              25               1               2            33.5
                                 Interview Guide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Category B Case Study SHD-Level Group Discussion Guide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD recipient staff............  CQM HD Recipient              40               1             2.5              67
                                 Group
                                 Discussion
                                 Guide.
HD recipient staff............  TBC HD Recipient              40               1             2.5              67
                                 Group
                                 Discussion
                                 Guide.
HD recipient staff............  CCL HD Recipient              40               1             2.5              67
                                 Group
                                 Discussion
                                 Guide.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Category B Cost Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD recipient staff............  HD Recipient                  25               1             2.5              21
                                 Resource Use
                                 and Cost
                                 Inventory Tool
                                 (Category B).
Partner site staff............  Partner Site-                 50               1             2.5              42
                                 Level Resource
                                 Use and Cost
                                 Inventory Tool
                                 (Category B).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Recipient-Led Evaluation Report Templates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HD recipient staff............  Category A EPMP               51               1               8             136
                                 Template.
HD recipient staff............  Category A--DDT               51               1               8             408
                                 Recipient-led
                                 Annual
                                 Evaluation
                                 Report
                                 Template(s).
HD recipient staff............  Category B--                  51               1               8             408
                                 DHDSP Recipient-
                                 led Evaluation
                                 Reporting
                                 Deliverable
                                 Template(s).
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ................           1,792  ..............  ..............           2,303
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-14301 Filed 7-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P