[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32072-32076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14144]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0754; FRL-9995-97-Region 3]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
District of Columbia; Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for 
2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state 
implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the District of 
Columbia (the District). The revision is in response to EPA's February 
3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit for various requirements relating 
to the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards 
(NAAQS). This SIP revision is specific to nonattainment new source 
review (NNSR) requirements. This action is being taken under the Clean 
Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on August 5, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2018-0754. All documents in the docket are listed on 
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, 
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business 
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is 
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard 
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through 
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in 
the For Further Information Contact section for additional availability 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Johansen, Permits Branch 
(3AD10), Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 
The telephone number is (215) 814-2156. Ms. Johansen can also be 
reached via electronic mail at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    On March 19, 2019 (84 FR 9995), EPA published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPRM) for the District. In the NPRM, EPA proposed approval 
of the District's NNSR Certification for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 
The formal SIP revision was submitted by the District on May 23, 2018. 
This SIP revision was in response to EPA's final 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS Findings of Failure to Submit for NNSR requirements. See 82 FR 
9158 (February 3, 2017). Specifically, the District certified that its 
existing NNSR program, covering the District portion of the Washington, 
DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area (Washington Area) for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS, is at least as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR 51.165, 
as amended by the final rule titled ``Implementation of the 2008 
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation 
Plan Requirements'' (SIP Requirements Rule), for ozone and its 
precursors.1 2 See 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The SIP Requirements Rule addresses a range of nonattainment 
area SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, including 
requirements pertaining to attainment demonstrations, reasonable 
further progress (RFP), reasonably available control technology, 
reasonably available control measures, major new source review, 
emission inventories, and the timing of SIP submissions and of 
compliance with emission control measures in the SIP. The rule also 
revokes the 1997 ozone NAAQS and establishes anti-backsliding 
requirements.
    \2\ On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for 
the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir. Court or Court) issued 
an opinion on the EPA's SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air 
Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 882 F.3d 1138, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 3636 
(DC Cir. February 16, 2018). The D.C. Cir. Court found certain 
provisions from the SIP Requirements Rule to be inconsistent with 
the statute or unreasonable and vacated those provisions. Id. The 
Court found other parts of the SIP Requirements Rule reasonable and 
denied the petition for appeal on those provisions. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 
0.075 parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). Under 
EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 50.15, the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is 
attained when the three-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily 
maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentration is less 
than or equal to 0.075 ppm.
    Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires EPA 
to designate as nonattainment any area that is violating the NAAQS 
based on the three most recent years of ambient air quality data at the 
conclusion of the designation process. The Washington Area was 
classified as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on 
May 21, 2012 (effective July 20, 2012) using 2008-2010 ambient air 
quality data. See 77 FR 30088. On March 6, 2015, EPA issued the final 
SIP Requirements Rule, which establishes the requirements that state, 
tribal, and local air quality management agencies must meet as they 
develop implementation plans for areas where air quality exceeds the 
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR 12264. Areas that were designated as 
marginal ozone nonattainment areas were required to attain the 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS no later than July 20, 2015, based on 2012-2014 
monitoring data. See 40 CFR 51.1103. The Washington Area did not attain 
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015; however, the area did 
meet the CAA section 181(a)(5) criteria, as interpreted in 40 CFR 
51.1107, for a one-year attainment date extension. See 81 FR 26697 (May 
4, 2016). Therefore, on April 11, 2016, the EPA Administrator signed a 
final rule extending the Washington Area 8-hour

[[Page 32073]]

ozone NAAQS attainment date from July 20, 2015 to July 20, 2016. Id.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA approved a Determination of Attainment (DOA) for the 
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Washington Area. This action was 
based on complete, certified, and quality assured ambient air 
quality monitoring data for the 2013-2015 monitoring period. See 82 
FR 52651 (November 14, 2017). It should be noted that a DOA does not 
alleviate the need for the District to certify that its existing SIP 
approved NNSR program is as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR 
51.165, as NNSR applies in nonattainment areas until an area has 
been redesignated to attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on initial nonattainment designations for the 2008 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS, as well as the March 6, 2015 final SIP Requirements Rule, 
the District was required to develop a SIP revision addressing certain 
CAA requirements for the Washington Area, and submit to EPA a NNSR 
Certification SIP or SIP revision no later than 36 months after the 
effective date of area designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS 
(i.e., July 20, 2015).\4\ See 80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015). EPA is 
approving the District's May 23, 2018 NNSR Certification SIP revision 
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Neither the District's obligation to submit the NNSR 
Certification SIP nor the requirements governing that submission 
were affected by the D.C. Circuit's February 16, 2018 decision on 
portions of the SIP Requirements Rule in South Coast Air Quality 
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    This rulemaking action is specific to the District's NNSR 
requirements. NNSR is a preconstruction review permit program that 
applies to new major stationary sources or major modifications at 
existing sources located in a nonattainment area. The specific NNSR 
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 
51.160 through 165.
    The District's SIP approved NNSR program, established in Chapters 1 
(Air Quality-General Rules) and 2 (Air Quality--General and 
Nonattainment Area Permits) in Title 20 of the District of Columbia 
Municipal Regulations (DCMR), apply to the construction and 
modification of major stationary sources in nonattainment areas. In its 
May 23, 2018 SIP revision, the District certified that the versions of 
20 DCMR Chapters 1 and 2 approved in the SIP are at least as stringent 
as the Federal NNSR requirements for the Washington Area.
    In addition, on February 3, 2017, EPA found that 15 states and the 
District failed to submit SIP revisions in a timely manner to satisfy 
certain requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS that apply to 
nonattainment areas and/or states in the OTR. See 82 FR 9158. As 
explained in that rulemaking action, consistent with the CAA and EPA 
regulations, these Findings of Failure to Submit established certain 
deadlines for the imposition of sanctions, if a state does not submit a 
timely SIP revision addressing the requirements for which the finding 
is being made, and for the EPA to promulgate a Federal implementation 
plan (FIP) to address any outstanding SIP requirements.
    EPA found, inter alia, that the District failed to submit SIP 
revisions in a timely manner to satisfy NNSR requirements for the 
Washington Area. The District submitted its May 23, 2018 SIP revision 
to address the specific NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS, located in 40 CFR 51.160 through 165, as well as its obligations 
under EPA's February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit. EPA's 
analysis of how this SIP revision addresses the NNSR requirements for 
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and the Findings of Failure to Submit was 
discussed in the NPRM and will not be restated here.

III. Public Comments and EPA Response

    EPA received one set of relevant comments on the March 19, 2019 
NPRM. A summary of the comments and EPA's responses are discussed in 
this Section. A copy of the comments can be found in the docket for 
this rulemaking action.
    Comment: The commenter affirms that under the CAA the EPA sets 
NAAQS for six criteria pollutants and after each NAAQS is set, states 
throughout the United States are required to develop reduction 
strategies, plans, and programs in order to attain those NAAQS. 
Further, the commenter notes that in 2008 EPA revised the 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS to 0.075 parts per million, which is attained when the three-year 
average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum average is less than 
0.075 ppm. The commenter asserts there is evidence to show that there 
is a relationship between ozone exposure and a number of lung and heart 
related diseases in children and adults, which in some cases increases 
visits to the Emergency Department (ED). Lastly, the commenter notes 
that ozone impacts human health and, if EPA approves the District's 
SIP, it is going against EPA's missions to protect human and 
environmental health.
    EPA Response: While not the subject of this rulemaking action, EPA 
thanks the commenter for their comments and agrees with the commenter's 
assertions, as it relates to setting the NAAQS and the impacts ozone 
can have on our health and the environment. In order to protect human 
health and welfare, the CAA requires EPA to establish NAAQS for certain 
common and widespread pollutants based on the latest science. Sections 
108 and 109 of the CAA govern the establishment, review and revision, 
as appropriate, of the NAAQS for each of the six common criteria air 
pollutants: Ground-level ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, 
lead, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. The CAA requires periodic 
review of the science upon which the standards are based and the 
standards themselves.
    EPA concurs that ozone pollution can trigger a variety of health 
problems, particularly for children, the elderly, and people of all 
ages who have lung diseases such as asthma. Which may in turn, increase 
emergency room visits and days absent from school and work. Specific to 
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, EPA looked at many epidemiological studies 
to determine ozone's effect on the population.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For more specifics on EPA's review of the health effects 
considered, see: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, March 2008. 
Final Ozone NAAQS Regulatory Impact Analysis. EPA-452/R-08-003. 
https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/docs/ria/naaqs-o3_ria_final_2008-03.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon EPA's comprehensive review of the ozone NAAQS, the 2008 8-hour 
ozone standard in this instance, EPA issued its final action to revise 
the NAAQS for ozone to establish new 8-hour standards. See 73 FR 16436 
(March 27, 2008). In that action, the EPA promulgated identical revised 
primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) ozone standards, 
designed to protect public health and welfare, of 0.075 parts per 
million (ppm).\6\ Those standards are met when the 3-year average of 
the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone 
concentration is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. See 40 CFR 50.15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Since the 2008 primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone are 
identical, for convenience, we refer to both as ``the 2008 ozone 
NAAQS'' or ``the 2008 ozone standard.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the NPRM, promulgation of a revised NAAQS triggers 
a requirement for the EPA to designate areas of the country as 
nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable for the standards; for 
ozone NAAQS, this also involves classifying any nonattainment areas at 
the time of designation. See CAA sections 107(d)(1) and 181(a)(1). 
Ozone nonattainment areas are classified based on the severity of their 
ozone levels (as determined based on the area's ``design value,'' which 
represents air quality in the area for the most recent three years).

[[Page 32074]]

The possible classifications for ozone nonattainment areas are 
marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme. See CAA section 
181(a)(1). Nonattainment areas with a ``lower'' classification have 
ozone levels that are closer to the standard than areas with a 
``higher'' classification.\7\ On May 21, 2012 and June 11, 2012, the 
EPA issued rules designating 46 areas throughout the country as 
nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, effective July 20, 2012, and 
establishing classifications for the designated nonattainment areas.\8\ 
As noted previously, the Washington Area was designated as marginal for 
the 2008 8-hour ozone standard. Areas designated nonattainment for the 
ozone NAAQS are subject to the general nonattainment area planning 
requirements of CAA section 172 and also to the ozone-specific planning 
requirements of CAA section 182. States in the OTR are additionally 
subject to the requirements outlined in CAA section 184. Ozone 
nonattainment areas in the lower classification levels have fewer and/
or less stringent mandatory air quality planning and control 
requirements than those in higher classifications. For a marginal area, 
a state is required to submit a baseline emissions inventory and adopt 
a SIP requiring emissions statements from stationary sources and 
implementing a NNSR program for the relevant ozone standard. See CAA 
section 182(a). For a moderate area, a state needs to comply with the 
marginal area requirements, plus additional requirements, including the 
requirement to submit a demonstration that the area will attain in six 
years, the requirement to adopt and implement certain emissions 
controls, such as Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT), and 
the requirement for greater emissions offsets for new or modified major 
stationary sources under the state's NNSR program. For each higher 
ozone nonattainment classification, a state needs to comply with all 
lower area classification requirements, plus additional emissions 
controls and more expansive NNSR offset requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 40 CFR 51.1103 for the design value thresholds for each 
classification for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
    \8\ 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012) and 77 FR 34221 (June 11, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CAA sets out specific requirements for states in the OTR.\9\ 
Upon promulgation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, states in the OTR were 
required to submit a SIP revision for RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1116. As 
noted in the March 19, 2019 NPRM, this requirement is the only 
recurring obligation for an OTR state upon revision of a NAAQS, unless 
that state also contains some portion of a nonattainment area for the 
revised NAAQS. In that case, the nonattainment requirements described 
above also apply to those portions of that state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ CAA section 184 details specific requirements for a group of 
states (and the District of Columbia) that make up the OTR. States 
in the OTR are required to submit RACT SIP revisions and mandate a 
certain level of emissions control for the pollutants that form 
ozone, even if the areas in the state meet the ozone standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 6, 2015, the EPA established a final implementation rule 
for the 2008 ozone SIP Requirements Rule. See 80 FR 12264. The purpose 
of that action was to detail the requirements applicable to ozone 
nonattainment areas, as well as requirements that apply in the OTR, and 
provide specific deadlines for SIP submittals.
    EPA agrees with the commenter and has taken the appropriate steps 
to promulgate ozone NAAQS that are protective of human health and the 
environment, in addition to providing ozone nonattainment areas with 
their specific statutory obligations under the CAA. EPA disagrees with 
the commenter's assertion that by approving the District's 2008 8-hour 
ozone SIP revision certifying that its NNSR program is adequate, EPA is 
somehow going against its mission to protect human health and the 
environment. To the contrary, EPA has determined that the District is 
meeting their statutory obligations relating to NNSR permitting as 
needed to work towards attaining and maintaining the 2008 8-hour ozone 
NAAQS, as required by the CAA and the final SIP Requirements Rule.
    Comment: The commenter states that in 2012, the Washington Area was 
in nonattainment and, subsequently in 2015 EPA issued a rule requiring 
state, local, and tribal air quality management agencies to create 
plans and programs to reduce ozone pollution. The commenter notes that 
the Washington Area modified its SIP and that EPA should not approve 
the District's SIP (EPA assumes the commenter is referring to a 
revision to the District's SIP).
    EPA Response: EPA agrees with the commenter's first point and notes 
that, as stated in the NPRM, the Washington Area was classified as 
marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on May 21, 2012 
(effective July 20, 2012) using 2008-2010 ambient air quality data. See 
77 FR 30088.
    As it relates to the commenter's second point, in EPA's March 19, 
2019 NPRM and in the previous response to comment, EPA thoroughly 
discussed specific SIP requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as set 
forth in the March 6, 2015 final SIP Requirements Rule and those 
specific requirements will not be restated here. See 84 FR 9995.
    Lastly, it is unclear to EPA what SIP revision (or plan revision) 
the commenter is referring to and, therefore, EPA cannot offer a 
specific response, except to reaffirm that per the subject of this 
rulemaking action, EPA is finalizing its determination that the 
District's existing NNSR program for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is at 
least as stringent as the requirements at 40 CFR 51.165, as amended by 
the final SIP Requirements Rule, for ozone and its precursors. See 80 
FR 12264 (March 6, 2015).
    Comment: The commenter emphasized that the District's SIP states 
that because the District is in the OTR, they do not need to meet the 
NAAQS requirements. The commenter then notes that because they are in 
the OTR, they are only required to meet the threshold under the Federal 
OTR requirements.
    EPA Response: EPA believes the commenter misunderstood the 
statement being made in the District's May 23, 2018 SIP revision. In 
EPA's March 19, 2019 NPRM, there was a thorough discussion related to 
applicable OTR requirements and those specifics will not be restated 
here, except to note that the entire District is currently designated 
as nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See ``Summary of SIP 
Revision and EPA Analysis'' in 84 FR 9995. Therefore, OTR emissions 
threshold requirements would not apply, but NNSR emissions thresholds 
(and all other NNSR requirements) continue to apply. See 40 CFR 
51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1). If EPA redesignates the Washington Area to 
attainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, at that time NNSR would no 
longer apply, but the Federal prevention of significant deterioration 
(PSD) and Federal OTR requirements (i.e., emissions thresholds and 
other applicable requirements) would apply to major sources in the 
District.
    Comment: The commenter asserts that despite the District never 
being classified as extreme nonattainment for ozone, the District 
should do a full review of their regulations.
    EPA Response: EPA agrees with the commenter's first point and the 
District's own assertion in its May 23, 2018 SIP revision. The District 
has never been classified as extreme nonattainment for an ozone NAAQS. 
Regarding the statement that the District should do a full review of 
its regulations, that comment is outside the scope of this action. This 
specific

[[Page 32075]]

rulemaking action is focused on NNSR requirements that apply to the 
nonattainment area and the District's SIP approved NNSR program, 
established in Chapters 1 (Air Quality-General Rules) and 2 (Air 
Quality--General and Nonattainment Area Permits) in Title 20 of the 
District of Columbia Municipal Regulations (DCMR). The District 
evaluated the necessary regulations for this rulemaking action and 
certified in its May 23, 2018 SIP revision that its existing Federally-
approved NNSR program is at least as stringent as the Federal NNSR 
requirements found at 40 CFR 51.165, and based on EPA's analysis of 
that SIP revision, EPA agrees with the District and is moving forward 
to approve this rulemaking action.
    Comment: The commenter makes a claim that in 2017, the Director of 
the District's Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE) claimed to 
be close to achieving the NAAQS standard for ozone, which has yet to 
happen.
    EPA Response: While EPA cannot speak to specific statements made by 
the Director of DOEE, nor are those alleged statements the subject of 
this rulemaking action, EPA can identify its approval of a 
Determination of Attainment (DOA) for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for 
the Washington Area. That action was based on complete, certified, and 
quality assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the 2013-2015 
monitoring period. See 82 FR 52651 (November 14, 2017). It should be 
noted that a DOA does not alleviate the need for the District to 
certify that its existing SIP approved NNSR program is as stringent as 
the requirements at 40 CFR 51.165, as NNSR applies in nonattainment 
areas until an area has been redesignated to attainment.
    In addition, on March 12, 2018, the District submitted to EPA for 
its approval, a redesignation request and maintenance plan for the 2008 
8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA has already acted on the District's maintenance 
plan portion of that March 12, 2018 SIP submittal and proposed approval 
of the District's redesignation request on May 21, 2019. See 84 FR 
15108 (April 15, 2019) and 84 FR 22996, respectively.
    Comment: The commenter makes a statement that the District has not 
submitted a SIP which includes regional planning, an emissions 
inventory, sources of haze-causing pollutants and a long-term strategy 
since 2010 and that this report should be updated, because the District 
is still in nonattainment for ozone. The commenter further asserts that 
EPA should not approve the District's SIP, because the District is not 
in attainment for ozone. The commenter believes that the District 
should be required to submit a full revision of its 2010 SIP and 
include an emissions inventory and a long-term strategy at the very 
least.
    EPA Response: It is unclear what ``full revision of the 2010 SIP'' 
the commenter is referencing, but to the extent the commenter is 
referring to a previously approved DOA and Clean Data Determination 
(CDD) for the 1997 8-hour Moderate Ozone Nonattainment Area, it is not 
the subject of this rulemaking action. See 77 FR 11739 (February 28, 
2012). EPA received the District's SIP revision for that rulemaking 
action on June 15, 2010 and finalized the rulemaking in 2012.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The commenter makes a statement with respect to ``haze-
causing pollutants'' and while not the subject of this rulemaking, 
EPA wants to confirm that the District has met and continues to meet 
their statutory obligations found at 40 CFR 51.308, as it relates to 
regional haze. The latest regional haze approvals for the District 
are as follows: Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report, See 82 FR 
37305 (August 10, 2017) and Regional Haze SIP (1st Planning Period), 
See 77 FR 5191 (Februaury 2, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The commenter also suggests that the District should be required to 
submit a full revision of its 2010 SIP, with an emissions inventory and 
long-tern strategy at the very least. This comment is not germane to 
this rulemaking action, which is focused on the District's NNSR 
program. The applicable CAA requirements for the District were clearly 
articulated in the March 19, 2019 NPRM for this action and will not be 
restated here.
    Finally, EPA disagrees with the commenter's statement that because 
the District is still in nonattainment, this SIP revision should not be 
approved. This SIP revision addressing NNSR requirements was submitted 
because the District was designated nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour 
ozone NAAQS. The SIP revision is an applicable requirement under the 
CAA for nonattainment areas and the District's SIP meets the applicable 
CAA standards; therefore, EPA is approving the SIP revision as required 
under CAA section 110(k)(3).

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving the District's May 23, 2018 SIP revision 
addressing the NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the 
Washington Area. EPA has concluded that the District's submission 
fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1114 revisions requirement, meets the 
requirements of CAA section 110 and 172 and the minimum SIP 
requirements of 40 CFR 51.165, as well as its obligations under EPA's 
February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit. See 82 FR 9158.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

[[Page 32076]]

    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by September 3, 2019. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor 
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may 
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or 
action. This action pertaining to the District's NNSR program and the 
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not be challenged later in proceedings to 
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: June 21, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart J--District of Columbia

0
2. In Sec.  52.470, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the 
entry ``2008 8-Hour Ozone Certification for Nonattainment New Source 
Review (NNSR)'' at the end of the table to read as follows:


Sec.  52.470  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e)* * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non-regulatory SIP          Applicable           State                                Additional
             revision                geographic area    submittal date   EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
2008 8-Hour Ozone Certification    The District of          05/23/2018  07/05/2019, Insert
 for Nonattainment New Source       Columbia.                            Federal Register
 Review (NNSR).                                                          citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-14144 Filed 7-3-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P