[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31687-31701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13668]



 ========================================================================
 Rules and Regulations
                                                 Federal Register
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
 having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
 to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
 under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
 
 The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
 
 ========================================================================
 

  Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 3, 2019 / Rules 
and Regulations  

[[Page 31687]]



FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

12 CFR Part 229

[Regulation CC; Docket No. R-1637]
RIN 7100-AF 28

BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION

12 CFR Part 1030

[Docket No. CFPB-2018-0035]
RIN 3170-AA31


Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC)

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) and 
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board and the Bureau (Agencies) are amending Regulation 
CC, which implements the Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFA Act), to 
implement a statutory requirement in the EFA Act to adjust the dollar 
amounts under the EFA Act for inflation. The Agencies are also amending 
Regulation CC to incorporate the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, 
and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) amendments to the EFA Act, which 
include extending coverage to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam, and making certain other technical 
amendments.

DATES: This rule is effective September 3, 2019, except for the 
amendments to 12 CFR 229.1, 229.10, 229.11, 229.12(d), 229.21, and 
appendix E to part 229, which are effective July 1, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Board: Gavin L. Smith, Senior Counsel, (202) 452-3474, Legal 
Division, or Ian C.B. Spear, Manager, (202) 452-3959, Division of 
Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems.
    Bureau: Joseph Baressi and Marta Tanenhaus, Senior Counsels, Office 
of Regulations, at (202) 435-7700. If you require this document in an 
alternative electronic format, please contact 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229) implements the EFA Act and the 
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (Check 21 Act). \1\ Subpart B 
of Regulation CC implements the requirements set forth in the EFA Act 
regarding the availability schedules within which banks \2\ must make 
funds available for withdrawal, exceptions to those schedules, 
disclosure of funds availability policies, and payment of interest. The 
EFA Act and subpart B of Regulation CC contain specified dollar 
amounts, including: (1) The minimum amount of deposited funds that 
banks must make available for withdrawal by opening of business on the 
next day for certain check deposits (``minimum amount''); \3\ (2) the 
amount a bank must make available when using the EFA Act's permissive 
adjustment to the funds-availability rules for withdrawals by cash or 
other means (``cash withdrawal amount''); \4\ (3) the amount of funds 
deposited by certain checks in a new account that are subject to next-
day availability (``new-account amount''); \5\ (4) the threshold for 
using an exception to the funds-availability schedules if the aggregate 
amount of checks on any one banking day exceed the threshold amount 
(``large-deposit threshold''); \6\ (5) the threshold for determining 
whether an account has been repeatedly overdrawn (``repeatedly 
overdrawn threshold''); \7\ and (6) the civil liability amounts for 
failing to comply with the EFA Act's requirements.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Expedited Funds Availability Act, 12 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; 
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 12 U.S.C. 5001 et seq.
    \2\ Section 229.2(e) of Regulation CC defines ``bank'' to 
include banks, savings institutions, and credit unions.
    \3\ The minimum amount is currently $200. See section 1086(e) of 
the Dodd-Frank Act; 12 U.S.C. 4002(a)(2)(D).
    \4\ The cash withdrawal amount is currently $400. 12 U.S.C. 
4002(b)(3)(B).
    \5\ The new-account amount is currently $5,000. 12 U.S.C. 
4003(a)(3).
    \6\ The large-deposit threshold is currently $5,000. 12 U.S.C. 
4003(b)(1).
    \7\ The repeatedly overdrawn threshold is currently $5,000. 12 
CFR 229.13(d). This dollar amount is not specified in the EFA Act, 
but is a result of the authority of the Board and the Bureau under 
section 604(b)(3) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4003(b)(3)) to establish 
reasonable exceptions to time limitations for deposit accounts that 
have been overdrawn repeatedly. The Board and the Bureau proposed to 
use their authority under section 604(b)(3) and also their authority 
under section 609(a) (12 U.S.C. 4008(a)), which is discussed below, 
to index the repeatedly overdrawn threshold in the same manner as 
the other dollar amounts. The Board and the Bureau stated that they 
believe that indexing the repeatedly overdrawn threshold would be 
consistent with the need identified by Congress to prevent such 
dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation. The Board and the 
Bureau did not receive comments suggesting that they should treat 
the repeatedly overdrawn threshold differently from the other dollar 
amounts, and they finalize this aspect of the proposal for the 
reasons stated in the proposal.
    \8\ The civil liability amounts are currently ``not less than 
$100 nor greater than $1,000'' for an individual action and ``not 
more than $500,000 or 1 percent of the net worth'' of a depository 
institution for a class action. 12 U.S.C. 4010(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
(Dodd-Frank Act) made certain amendments to the EFA Act, and these 
amendments were effective on July 21, 2011.\9\ Section 609(a) of the 
EFA Act,\10\ as amended by section 1086(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, 
provides that the Board and the Director of the Bureau shall jointly 
prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of the EFA Act, to 
prevent the circumvention or evasion of such provisions, and to 
facilitate compliance with such provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Public Law 111-203, sections 1062, 1086, 1100H, 124 Stat. 
2081 (2010); 75 FR 57252 (Sept. 20, 2010).
    \10\ 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, section 1086(f) of the Dodd-Frank Act added section 
607(f) of the EFA Act, which provides that the dollar amounts under the 
EFA Act shall be adjusted every five years after December 31, 2011, by 
the annual percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban 
Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W), as published by the Bureau 
of Labor Statistics, rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 12 U.S.C. 4006(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer 
Protection Act (EGRRCPA) made amendments to the EFA Act to extend its 
application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and Guam.\12\ The effect of these statutory amendments is to 
subject banks in American Samoa, the

[[Page 31688]]

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam to the EFA Act's 
requirements related to funds availability, payment of interest, and 
disclosures. Banks in those territories would be able to avail 
themselves of the one-day extension of the availability schedules 
permitted by the EFA Act and Sec.  229.12(e) of Regulation CC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Public Law 115-174, section 208 (2018). The amendments that 
section 208 of the EGRRCPA made to the EFA Act became effective on 
June 23, 2018. See section 208(b) of the EGRRCPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of Proposed Rule, Comments Received, and Final Rule

    On December 10, 2018, the Agencies published a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (proposal) to implement the statutory requirement in the EFA 
Act to adjust the dollar amounts under the Act for inflation and to 
implement the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.\13\ The Agencies 
received 32 responses to their proposal from a variety of commenters, 
including depository institutions, service providers, trade 
associations, clearinghouses, consumer organizations, and private 
individuals.\14\ Nine commenters explicitly expressed general support 
for the proposal, two additional trade association commenters 
specifically supported the proposal's calculation methodology and 
timeframes, and twelve commenters specifically supported the proposed 
one-year effective date. As discussed in more detail below, three 
institutions opposed basic tenets of the statutory requirements based 
on concerns about loss to institutions due to customer fraud: the first 
disagreed altogether with need to make inflationary adjustments for 
purposes of funds availability; the second disagreed with adjusting the 
statutory dollar amounts every five years; and the third opposed basing 
the hold amount on the CPI, stating that individual check amounts are 
not reflective of inflation.\15\ Some commenters addressed other 
specific aspects of the proposal. As discussed in more detail below, 
the Agencies considered all of the comments received and are adopting 
the amendments to Regulation CC described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 83 FR 63431, Dec. 10, 2018. In their December 2018 Federal 
Register notice, the Agencies also provided an additional 
opportunity for public comment on certain amendments to the funds-
availability provisions in Regulation CC that the Board proposed in 
2011. The Agencies are not herein addressing the Board's 2011 
proposal or the comments received thereon.
    \14\ The Board received 18 comments and the Bureau received 23. 
Of the 41 total comments received, nine commenters submitted 
identical comment letters to both Agencies.
    \15\ Because the statute is clear in its directives to make 
inflationary adjustments to dollar amounts under the EFA Act every 
five years based on the CPI-W, the Agencies are finalizing the rule 
as proposed with regard to these fundamental statutory requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Effective Dates for Inflation Adjustments

    The Agencies continue to believe, as stated in the proposal, that 
section 607(f) of the EFA Act is reasonably interpreted to provide for 
five years to elapse between a given set of adjustments and the next 
set of adjustments, with the first set of adjustments occurring 
sometime after December 31, 2011. The Agencies believe that Congress 
intended to balance its concern about changes being too frequent or 
abrupt with the need to prevent the EFA Act's dollar amounts from being 
eroded by inflation. As regulators of depository institutions, the 
Agencies are likewise familiar with the challenges that institutions 
can face if changes to regulatory requirements are too frequent or 
abrupt. Congress balanced these concerns by providing that the 
adjustments would be effective at five-year intervals; by providing 
that the first set of adjustments would not occur until after December 
31, 2011, which ensured that at least a full calendar year would elapse 
after the Dodd-Frank Act's enactment in mid-2010; and by providing that 
the adjustments would be rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.
    In their December 2018 proposal, the Agencies stated they expected 
to publish the first set of adjustments as a final rule in the first 
quarter of 2019, with a proposed effective date of April 1, 2020. The 
Agencies further stated they expected to publish the second set of 
adjustments in the first quarter of 2024, with an effective date of 
April 1, 2025. For each subsequent set of adjustment, the Agencies 
proposed an effective date of April 1 of every fifth year after 2025. 
The Agencies stated their belief that the proposed effective dates 
would provide institutions with sufficient time to make any necessary 
disclosure and software changes and the Agencies requested comment on 
the proposed effective dates for the adjustments.
    Fourteen commenters addressed the amount of time between the 
Agencies' publication of a final rule setting forth the inflation 
adjustments and the rule's effective date. Of those, twelve commenters 
supported the Agencies' proposed one-year interim, one commenter 
requested 18 months, and another requested two years. Two of the 
commenters that supported the one-year interim recommended that, if the 
Agencies do not release the final rule by April 1, 2019, the effective 
date should be extended such that it is at least one year after the 
release date of the final rule.
    For the reasons set forth in the proposal and above, the Agencies 
are finalizing as proposed the one-year interim between publication of 
the first set of adjustments and the adjustments' effective date. 
Because the Agencies are releasing this final rule in June 2019, the 
effective date for the final rule is July 1, 2020. Further, the 
Agencies anticipate carrying this one-year interim forward for future 
adjustments. Specifically, Sec.  229.11(a) of the final rule states 
that the relevant EFA Act dollar amounts, as reflected in Regulation 
CC, shall be adjusted effective on July 1, 2020, on July 1, 2025, and 
on July 1 of every fifth year after 2025. The Agencies anticipate 
issuing a rule in the Federal Register setting forth the inflation 
adjustments at least one year before the effective date of each ensuing 
adjustment. For example, the Agencies anticipate publishing in the 
first half of 2024 the second set of inflation adjustments, which will 
become effective July 1, 2025.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The effective dates are consistent with section 302 of the 
Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 
(Pub. L. 103-325, 108 Stat. 2160, 12 U.S.C. 4802). That section 
provides that new regulations and amendments to regulations 
prescribed by Federal banking agencies, including the Board (but not 
the Bureau), that impose additional reporting, disclosures, or other 
new requirements on insured depository institutions shall take 
effect on the first day of a calendar quarter which begins on or 
after the date on which the regulations are published in final form 
(with certain exceptions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to expressing general support for the timeframes in the 
proposal, one commenter specifically stated that the industry will 
benefit from having a predetermined schedule for making future updates 
to the EFA Act dollar amounts. Two commenters additionally requested 
that the Agencies tie the inflation adjustment effective dates to the 
effective dates of any other disclosure changes so depository 
institutions would not have to make other changes to disclosures in the 
interim years.
    The Agencies believe that institutions will benefit from having 
their implementation of the statutorily-required inflation adjustments 
occur on a predetermined five-year cycle and, as noted above, that 
section 607(f) of the EFA Act is reasonably interpreted to provide for 
five years to elapse between a given set of adjustments and the next 
set of adjustments. Thus, the Agencies are finalizing the rule as 
proposed with the five-year cycle between inflation adjustments. 
Nonetheless, as stated above, the Agencies are cognizant of the 
potential burden on institutions if

[[Page 31689]]

regulatory changes are too frequent or abrupt. Accordingly, the 
Agencies recognize the benefit of making efforts, if appropriate and 
feasible, to coordinate the effective dates of future rulemakings 
effecting changes to disclosures required by the funds-availability 
provisions in Regulation CC subpart B with the predetermined effective 
dates for the inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation 
CC subpart B that are set forth herein.

B. Methodology for Inflation Adjustments

1. Measurement of Underlying Inflation
    EFA Act section 607(f) does not specify which month's CPI-W should 
be used to measure inflation. The Agencies proposed to use the July 
CPI-W, which is released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in August. 
The Agencies proposed to use the aggregate percentage change in the 
CPI-W from July 2011 to July 2018 as the initial inflation measurement 
period for the first set of adjustments. The Agencies proposed that the 
second set of adjustments would be based on the aggregate percentage 
change in the CPI-W for an inflation measurement period that begins in 
July 2018 and ends in July 2023. And, the Agencies proposed that each 
subsequent set of adjustments would be based on the aggregate 
percentage change in the CPI-W for an inflation measurement period that 
begins in July of every fifth year after 2018 and ends in July of every 
fifth year after 2023. The Agencies stated in their proposal that this 
use of July CPI-W, starting with the July 2011 CPI-W, aligns with 
section 607(f)'s effective date of July 21, 2011. The Agencies 
specifically requested comment on this approach.
    Most commenters that addressed the issue supported the Agencies' 
proposed inflation calculation methodology. However, one commenter 
recommended that the Agencies base the calculation of inflation on the 
change in the CPI-W from July 2013 to July 2018 on the grounds that it 
would result in a lower aggregate percentage change for the first set 
of adjustments. The Agencies are finalizing the rule as proposed with 
the first set of inflation adjustments--published herein and effective 
July 1, 2020--based on inflation, as measured by the CPI-W, from July 
2011 to July 2018. As discussed in the proposal, the Agencies continue 
to believe it is appropriate for the inflation adjustments to be based 
on underlying inflation since the effective date of the relevant Dodd-
Frank Act provisions, which is July 21, 2011. The Agencies do not 
believe that the need identified by Congress to prevent the relevant 
dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation would be served by 
omitting the period of July 2011 to July 2013 from the Agencies' 
calculation, as the commenter advocated. The second set of inflation 
adjustments--which the Agencies anticipate publishing in the first half 
of 2024 and which will be effective July 1, 2025--will be based on 
underlying inflation from July 2018 through July 2023. The third set of 
adjustments--which the Agencies anticipate publishing in the first half 
of 2029 and which will be effective July 1, 2030--will be based on 
inflation from July 2023 through July 2028.
2. Aggregate Percentage Increase
    Section 607(f) of the EFA Act provides that the adjustments must be 
based on the ``annual percentage increase'' in the CPI-W, but does not 
specify how the adjustment must be made in the event that the CPI-W is 
negative for one or more years in the inflation measurement period. The 
Agencies maintain their position from the proposal \17\ that it is a 
reasonable interpretation of section 607(f) to account for negative 
movements in the CPI-W on a year-to-year basis and to include those 
movements when measuring the underlying inflation that is the basis for 
calculating adjustments to the dollar amounts in subpart B of 
Regulation CC. Of the few commenters that addressed this issue, most 
supported the Agencies' proposed approach, and the Agencies are 
adopting it in the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Agencies proposed an approach under which the five-
year adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation CC subpart B would 
always be zero or upward, never downward. Specifically, the Agencies 
proposed that if there is no aggregate percentage increase (zero 
increase) in the CPI-W or an aggregate percentage decrease (negative 
increase) in the CPI-W during the five-year inflation measurement 
period, then there would be no downward adjustments to the dollar 
amounts in Regulation CC subpart B.
    One depository institution commented that the proposed approach 
could cause funds-availability risks to institutions under certain 
economic scenarios of sustained deflation (negative inflation). Another 
institution characterized the Agencies' proposed approach as being 
somewhat arbitrary but generally agreed that the aggregate change would 
most likely be zero or positive. Conversely, a consumer organization 
explicitly agreed with the proposed approach and stated that negative 
inflation should not result in decreased funds availability to 
consumers.
    Under the Agencies' final rule, as proposed, the adjustments to the 
dollar amounts in Regulation CC subpart B will always be zero or 
upward, never downward. The Agencies continue to believe this approach 
is a reasonable interpretation of the phrase ``annual percentage 
increase'' in EFA Act section 607(f), in that reading out the word 
``increase'' from the statute would not be consistent with the 
statutory scheme. Further, as noted in their proposal,\18\ the Agencies 
reiterate that, since 1939, no aggregate change in the CPI-W across a 
five-year period has been negative. Nonetheless, if it were to become 
necessary and appropriate in the future, the Agencies could consider 
steps to address the funds-availability risks to institutions that 
could be associated with a sustained--i.e., more-than-five-year--period 
of deflation, if any such period of deflation were ever to actually 
occur.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 14, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. Rounding to the Nearest Multiple of $25
    EFA Act section 607(f) states that the dollar amounts under the Act 
shall be adjusted every five years for inflation, as measured by the 
CPI-W, ``rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.'' In keeping with that 
statutory directive, the Agencies proposed that, if there is an 
aggregate percentage increase in any five-year inflation measurement 
period, then the aggregate percentage change would be applied to the 
dollar amounts in Regulation CC, and those amounts would be rounded to 
the nearest multiple of $25 to determine the new adjusted dollar 
amounts that appear in the regulation.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ For example, if the CPI-W in July of Year X and in July of 
Year X + 5 were 100 and 114.7, respectively, the aggregate 
percentage change that results from the change in the CPI-W would be 
14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount in the regulation was $200 
for the prior period, then the adjusted figure in the regulation 
would become $225, because the calculated change of 14.7 percent of 
$200, which is $29.40, results in rounding to $225 as that would be 
the nearest multiple of $25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two depository institutions and two trade associations recommended 
rounding to a different value than $25, including rounding to the 
nearest $100 or to the nearest place value or setting the minimum 
amount at $300, on the grounds of reducing institutions' costs by 
reducing the frequency of the inflation adjustments and reducing 
consumer confusion. The Agencies

[[Page 31690]]

believe that this suggested approach would be inconsistent with the 
language of section 607(f) of the EFA Act that expressly refers to 
``rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.'' Accordingly, the Agencies 
are adopting a final rule under which the adjusted dollar amounts in 
the regulation are rounded to the nearest multiple of $25.
4. Notice and Comment
    One depository institution suggested that the Agencies allow for 
public comment each time the Agencies adjust the dollar amounts in the 
regulation for inflation. The commenter stated that this approach would 
allow institutions and the Agencies to consider whether the adjustments 
continue to be cost effective and to ensure that the adjustments 
benefit consumers enough to justify the additional costs to 
institutions.
    Congress has required the Agencies to adjust dollar amounts under 
the EFA Act for inflation. If, as the commenter suggests, the Agencies 
were to obtain public comment in advance of future five-year inflation 
adjustments, those comments could not serve as a legal basis for the 
Agencies to override the fundamental statutory requirement to 
effectuate inflation adjustments. In addition, the Agencies are herein 
adopting the methodology for the calculations underlying the 
statutorily-required inflation adjustments, including future five-year 
adjustments, and the Agencies have adopted that methodology through 
notice-and-comment rulemaking. Accordingly, and as stated in the 
Agencies' proposal,\20\ with respect to future inflation adjustments 
for subsequent five-year periods, the Agencies continue to expect to 
find that notice and opportunity for public comment for the adjustments 
is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, 
because the calculation methodology for the adjustments is set forth 
herein and future execution of the adjustments will be technical and 
non-discretionary. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For example, the Agencies 
have determined in the final rule set forth herein that the second set 
of inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts in Regulation CC will be 
based on inflation as measured by the CPI-W from July 2018 through July 
2023. As noted above, the Agencies anticipate publishing those 
adjustments in the Federal Register in the first half of 2024, to be 
effective July 1, 2025, so that institutions will have sufficient time 
to implement the inflation adjustments. Further, the Agencies are 
always open to feedback about how their rules could be improved, and 
they take appropriate steps in response to such feedback.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See 83 FR 63431 at 63433 footnote 17, Dec. 10, 2018.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Burden on Institutions From Implementing the Inflation Adjustments

    Many commenters, including credit unions and credit union trade 
associations, expressed concern regarding the burden imposed on 
institutions to implement the inflation adjustments. Several credit 
union commenters stated that the cost burden imposed on institutions to 
implement the inflation indexing could exceed the Agencies' estimate in 
the proposal, noting in particular the printing and distribution costs 
associated with sending notices to customers of the changes in the 
institutions' funds-availability policies (commonly referred to as 
``change-in-terms'' notices). \21\ One credit union commenter 
summarized this position by stating that the Agencies' cost estimate 
constitutes a ``basic approximation'' that left out other potential 
costs, including communication with members before each change. This 
section discusses commenter concerns and suggestions regarding the 
burden imposed by the inflation indexing. Those concerns are also 
discussed below in the Agencies' analyses pursuant to the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act, the Board's analysis pursuant to the Paperwork 
Reduction Act, and the Bureau's analysis pursuant to section 1022 of 
the Dodd-Frank Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ Regulation CC Sec.  229.18(e) requires a depository 
institution to send customers a written notice regarding a change to 
the bank's funds-availability policy. The changes to the 
availability policies to reflect the statutorily-required inflation 
adjustments, as implemented by this final rule, would trigger the 
requirement to send a change-in-terms notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Notices to Customers of Changes to Institutions' Funds-Availability 
Policies
    As noted above, commenters expressed concern regarding the burden 
associated with the requirement to send customers a change-in-terms 
notice reflecting the inflation-adjusted Regulation CC funds-
availability amounts. One commenter specifically voiced concern about 
the disproportionate cost impact on smaller credit unions for printing 
and mailing notices in general and, in specific, the change-in-terms 
notice. To reduce that burden, the commenter also urged the Agencies to 
reduce the length of the required funds-availability disclosures or 
permit them to accompany monthly account statements. Another commenter 
suggested reducing burden by establishing an exception within the 
Regulation CC provision, Sec.  229.18(e), that requires the change-in-
terms notice. Specifically, the commenter suggested that an institution 
not be required to provide a change-in-terms notice when its funds-
availability policy changes due to the periodic inflation adjustments 
to the Regulation CC funds-availability dollar amounts that are 
mandated by section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
    The Regulation CC change-in-terms provision (Sec.  229.18(e)) 
mirrors the statutory change-in-terms provision, which is set forth in 
EFA Act section 605(c)(2). That statutory provision requires an 
institution to send a written notice to consumer account holders at 
least 30 days before implementing a change to the institution's funds-
availability policy and further states that ``any change which 
expedites the availability of such funds shall be disclosed not later 
than 30 days after implementation.'' See EFA Act section 605(c)(2) (12 
U.S.C. 4004(c)(2)).
    In their final rule, the Agencies decline to establish in 
Regulation CC an exception to the requirement to send a change-in-terms 
notice, as this requirement is established by statute. However, the 
Agencies note several ways that depository institutions may lower their 
costs under the rule, including providing the required notice 
electronically and sending it with the monthly account statement, as 
follows.
    Electronic delivery is permitted where the institution has complied 
with the requirements of the Electronic Signatures in Global and 
National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. (``E-Sign Act'')). See 
comment 229.15(a)-1. Further, the regulation already permits an 
institution to send a required change-in-terms notice on or with a 
monthly account statement, and this is so irrespective of whether the 
institution sends the notice and statement electronically or in paper 
form. See comment 229.18(e)-1 (stating that the change-in-terms notice 
required by Sec.  229.18(e) ``may be given in any form as long as it is 
clear and conspicuous''). In addition, an institution need not set 
forth the entirety of its revised funds-availability policy in its 
change-in-terms notice. If an institution chooses to provide the notice 
by sending a complete new availability disclosure, the institution must 
direct the customer to the changed terms in the disclosure by use of a 
letter or insert, or by highlighting the changed terms in the 
disclosure. See comment 229.18(e)-1. And finally, as discussed above, 
the Agencies anticipate providing one year between the date of 
publication in the Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts 
and the

[[Page 31691]]

date on which the adjusted amounts become effective. The Agencies 
believe that this one-year timeframe provides institutions with a 
sufficient interim in which to plan to send their change-in-terms 
notices in a way that minimizes the burden associated with doing so. In 
light of all of these factors, and given that the inflation adjustments 
are statutorily required and will occur only once every five years, the 
Agencies do not believe that the burden concerns raised warrant any 
modification to the requirement to send change-in-terms notices.

2. Minimum Availability Amounts Required by the Regulation

    To obviate the need to send a change-in-terms notice to consumers 
every five years when the dollar amounts in Regulation CC are adjusted 
for inflation, one depository institution commented that the regulation 
should permit institutions to provide to customers a funds-availability 
policy disclosure that includes a phrase such as ``minimum amount 
required by regulation,'' rather than setting forth an actual dollar 
figure that potentially (if inflation is sufficient) must be updated 
every five years. The Agencies decline to adopt this approach because 
they believe it would result in consumer confusion. Specifically, the 
Agencies believe that one of the purposes of the statute, that 
consumers be informed of the specific amount of deposits available to 
them under an institution's funds-availability policy, would be 
foreclosed under the commenter's suggested approach.
3. Overall Opposition to the Inflation Adjustments
    Three commenters opposed making inflation adjustments altogether. 
One commenter disagreed with adjusting the statutory dollar amounts 
every five years, because it opens institutions up to increased losses 
from fraud. Another stated that it does not make sense to base the 
funds-availability hold amounts on the CPI-W, because individual check 
amounts are not reflective of inflation. And, another stated that 
making higher dollar amounts available would end up imposing costs on 
consumers, because institutions would inevitably pass on to consumers 
their higher costs from fraud losses that would result from the higher 
funds-availability amounts.
    While the Agencies are cognizant of the burden regulations place on 
institutions, the inflation adjustments to the dollar amounts under the 
EFA Act are required by statute. The Agencies understand that Congress, 
in providing for a five-year cycle between inflation adjustments, 
intended to balance concerns regarding burden with the need to prevent 
the EFA Act's dollar amounts from being eroded by inflation.\22\ 
Congress also specified that the CPI-W should be used.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Consistent with this view, the EFA Act's legislative 
history shows that one intent of the Act was to ``provide a fairer 
balance between the banks' interest in avoiding fraud and consumers' 
interests in having speedy access to their funds.'' S. Rep. No. 100-
19, at 28 (1987); see also H.R. Rep. No. 100-52, at 14 (1987) 
(describing the efforts ``to protect depository institutions while 
furthering the original goals of the legislation to provide shorter 
time periods for funds availability.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Regulation CC Changes To Implement the EGRRCPA Amendments to the EFA 
Act

    Two commenters supported the Agencies' proposed changes to 
Regulation CC to implement the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act that 
extended its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam. The proposed changes included 
updating the definitions of ``state'' and ``United States'' in 
Regulation CC to include these territories as well as other conforming 
amendments. No commenters opposed the proposed changes. In their final 
rule, the Agencies adopt these changes as proposed.

E. Technical Amendments to Appendix A of Regulation DD

    The Bureau proposed a technical, non-substantive amendment to its 
Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, to add a new paragraph (e) to Sec.  
1030.1 that would cross-reference the Bureau's joint authority with the 
Board to issue regulations under certain provisions of the EFA Act that 
are codified within Regulation CC. The Bureau also proposed related 
technical, non-substantive amendments to Sec.  1030.7(c), and the 
commentary thereto, which states that interest shall begin to accrue 
not later than the business day specified for interest-bearing accounts 
in the EFA Act and Regulation CC. In addition, the Bureau proposed to 
fix technical errors in Appendix A to Regulation DD within the formulas 
that demonstrate how to calculate annual percentage yield (APY) and 
annual percentage yield earned (APYE). Specifically, certain terms 
within the formulas should be shown as exponents but currently are 
erroneously not shown as exponents. These typographical errors were 
inadvertently introduced into the APY and APYE formulas in Appendix A 
when the Bureau issued its restatement of Regulation DD in December 
2011.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 76 FR 79276 (Dec. 21, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Bureau received one comment regarding its proposed correction 
of technical errors in Appendix A to Regulation DD, recommending that 
the Bureau consult with the National Credit Union Association (NCUA) to 
determine whether it is necessary to amend Appendix A within credit 
unions' equivalent regulation under the Truth in Savings Act (TISA), 
specifically, Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707. The technical errors that 
are present in Appendix A to Regulation DD are not present in Appendix 
A to 12 CFR part 707. Thus, the Bureau has no reason to believe it is 
necessary for the NCUA to amend Appendix A to 12 CFR part 707. In 
addition, as described below, the Bureau has performed interagency 
consultations regarding this final rule, including with the NCUA.
    The Bureau is adopting as proposed the above-described technical, 
non-substantive amendments to Regulation DD and Appendix A thereto.

III. Legal Authority

    In issuing the final rule, the Agencies are exercising their 
authority under section 609(a) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4008(a)) to 
amend subpart B and, in connection therewith, subpart A, of Regulation 
CC to prescribe regulations to carry out the provisions of the EFA Act, 
to prevent the circumvention or evasion of such provisions, and to 
facilitate compliance with such provisions.\24\ Additionally, with 
respect to the technical amendments to Regulation DD, the Bureau is 
exercising its authority under section 269(a) of TISA (12 U.S.C. 
4308(a)) to prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose and 
provisions of TISA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Additionally, section 604(b)(3) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 
4003(b)(3)) authorizes the Agencies to establish reasonable 
exceptions to time limitations for deposit accounts that have been 
overdrawn repeatedly. As noted above, the Agencies also rely on this 
authority in adjusting the repeatedly overdrawn threshold in 12 CFR 
229.13(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Administrative Law Matters

A. Bureau's Dodd-Frank Act Section 1022(b)(2)(A) Analysis

1. Overview
    Section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Act provides that in 
prescribing a rule under the Federal consumer financial laws, the 
Bureau shall consider the potential benefits and costs to consumers and 
covered persons, including the potential reduction of access by 
consumers to consumer financial products or services resulting from 
such rule; the impact on depository institutions and credit unions with 
$10 billion or less in total

[[Page 31692]]

assets as described in section 1026 of the Dodd-Frank Act; and the 
impact on consumers in rural areas.\25\ The Bureau requested comment on 
the preliminary analysis as well as the submission of additional data 
that could inform the Bureau's analysis of the benefits, costs, and 
impacts of the rule. The Bureau received four comments on the 
preliminary analysis, which it has considered in developing this final 
analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A). Although the manner and extent to 
which section 1022(b)(2)(A) applies to a joint Bureau and Board 
rulemaking under the EFA Act is unclear, to inform this rulemaking 
more fully the Bureau performed the described analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This analysis considers the benefits, costs, and impacts of this 
final rule using a pre-statutory baseline. That is, the Bureau's 
analysis below considers the benefits, costs, and impacts of the 
relevant provisions of the EGRRCPA combined with this final rule 
relative to the regulatory regime that pre-dates the EGRRCPA.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The Bureau has discretion in future rulemakings to choose 
the most appropriate baseline for that particular rulemaking. Also 
note that the Bureau's analysis excludes the Board's final 
amendments to subpart C of Regulation CC. Additionally, the Bureau's 
amendments to Regulation DD are technical and non-substantive and so 
do not affect the benefits, costs, or impacts of the final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Potential Benefits and Costs to Consumers and Covered Persons
    This final rule adjusts for inflation the funds that must be 
available as required by the EFA Act and Regulation CC. Moreover, 
depository institutions located in American Samoa, the Northern Mariana 
Islands, and Guam will now be required to comply with the provisions in 
the EFA Act and subpart B of Regulation CC related to funds 
availability, payment of interest, and disclosures to their customers. 
The final rule keeps the expected losses to depository institutions 
constant in real terms by adjusting for inflation the funds that must 
be available. Thus, the Bureau does not expect any potential benefits, 
costs, or impacts to consumers or covered persons as a result of the 
adjustment methodology, other than the paperwork costs discussed below. 
The adjustments and methodology in this rule are technical, and they 
merely apply the statutory method for adjusting amounts that must be 
available to consumers.
    The Bureau estimates that covered persons will face an average 
paperwork cost of approximately $2,241 every five years to update 
notices already sent to consumers.\27\ Specifically, the Bureau 
estimates that compliance will require 60 hours every five years. The 
Bureau further assumes an average hourly wage of $37.35, as explained 
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis, the Bureau stated that 
covered persons would face an average paperwork cost of $398.04 
every five years. The Bureau received comments that the total and 
the assumed number of hours were too low. To be consistent with the 
PRA analysis, the Bureau should have stated that covered persons 
would face an average paperwork cost of $398.04 every year, which 
would be $1,990.20 every five years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the proposed 1022(b)(2) analysis, the Bureau used the average 
hourly wage rate for compliance officers of $33.17. The revised average 
hourly wage rate reflects two adjustments. First, the Bureau is using 
figures reported in the Occupational Employment Statistics for May 2018 
instead of May 2016. Second, two commenters observed that 
implementation requires staff besides compliance officers to make 
system updates and that technical staff might have a higher average 
hourly wage. The Bureau does not have representative data on the 
combinations of staff that would be used in recurring system changes of 
the type required by this rule. The Bureau agrees, however, that the 
prior estimate likely underestimated the average hourly cost. The 
second adjustment takes some account of differences in staff and costs 
to mitigate any underestimation.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Occupational 
Employment and Wage Estimates (May 2018), available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm. The average hourly wage is a 
weighted average of 40% of the average annual wage for compliance 
officers ($34.86), 40% for operations staff ($36.98), and 20% for 
computer programmers ($43.07). In addition, one commenter said that 
the wage should take into account benefits as well as salary. Given 
that the required changes occur just once every five years, the 
Bureau expects that there would be large differences across 
institutions in use of contractors and salaried employees. The 
Bureau does not have the data required to take these differences 
into account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Two commenters stated that the rule would trigger the regulation's 
requirement to provide a change-in-terms notice and that this would 
create costs for printing and mailing. However, the change-in-terms 
notice can be provided on the monthly account statement (the notice can 
also be provided electronically if the institution has the consumer's 
E-Sign consent). The Bureau therefore does not agree that the rule 
would necessitate an increase in printing and mailing costs.
    Additionally, the EGRRCPA made amendments to the EFA Act to extend 
its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, and Guam.\29\ The final rule implements the EGRRCPA by 
extending the application of Regulation CC's requirements related to 
funds availability, payment of interest, and disclosures to 
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, and Guam. Consumers of depository institutions in 
American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands will generally 
receive the same benefits of consumers of institutions already 
complying with subpart B of Regulation CC. This includes policies and 
other disclosures regarding funds availability and timely access to 
their funds. Consumers will generally not experience any costs 
associated with changes to existing policies or with receiving these 
disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ Public Law 115-174, section 208 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on regulatory filings, the Bureau has identified five 
institutions headquartered in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam that are newly subject to Regulation 
CC as a result of the amendments made to the EFA Act by the EGRRCPA, 
and that may therefore face compliance costs associated with this final 
rule. Although these institutions will incur costs to comply with the 
requirements of Regulation CC, the Bureau does not have data on the 
impact of the requirements of this final rule on these institutions. 
The Bureau specifically requested information from commenters on the 
costs of complying with Regulation CC for institutions in American 
Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam and 
on those institutions' pre-statutory practices regarding funds 
availability. No comments provided data or other information in 
response to this request.
3. Impact on Depository Institutions With No More Than $10 Billion in 
Assets
    The final rule's inflation adjustments and changes to disclosures 
will impact all depository institutions, including those with no more 
than $10 billion in assets. The Bureau expects that all depository 
institutions will experience an average cost of approximately $2,241 to 
update quinquennial notices.
    The EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act to extend its application to 
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that 
are now required to comply with Regulation CC, and all have no more 
than $10 billion in assets. The Bureau requested information from 
commenters on the total cost that would be experienced by these 
depository institutions to comply with Regulation CC. No comments 
provided data or other information in response to this request.

[[Page 31693]]

4. Impact on Access to Credit
    The Bureau does not expect the final rule to affect consumers' 
access to credit. The scope of this rulemaking is limited to funds 
availability in depository accounts and is not directly related to 
credit access.
5. Impact on Rural Areas
    The Bureau does not believe that the final rule will have a unique 
impact on consumers in rural areas.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Board: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires an agency to 
publish a final regulatory flexibility analysis with a final rule or 
certify that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. Based on its analysis, and for 
the reasons stated below, the Board believes that the rule will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Nevertheless, the Board is publishing a final regulatory 
flexibility analysis.
    1. Statement of the need for, and objectives of, the proposed rule. 
The final rule memorializes the calculation method used to adjust the 
EFA Act dollar amounts every five years in accordance with section 
607(f) of the EFA Act, as amended by section 1086(f) of the Dodd-Frank 
Act. The final rule also implements the statutory amendments to the EFA 
Act to extend its application to American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 
the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.
    2. Small entities affected by the proposed rule. The final rule 
applies to all depository institutions regardless of their size. 
Pursuant to regulations issued by the Small Business Administration (13 
CFR 121.201), a ``small banking organization'' includes a depository 
institution with $550 million or less in total assets. Based on call 
report data, there are approximately 9,460 depository institutions that 
have total domestic assets of $550 million or less and thus are 
considered small entities for purposes of the RFA. All institutions 
will be required to update existing disclosures to their customers with 
any adjustments in the dollar amounts and update their software to 
adjust the availability amounts where necessary. As discussed above, 
while some commenters suggested the cost burden on institutions 
implementing the inflation indexing could be greater than the proposal 
estimated, the Board does not believe the final rule will have a 
significant economic impact on the entities that it affects. 
Specifically, the extent of impact on small entities may depend on the 
contents of the institution's funds availability policy and the 
frequency of the institution's regularly scheduled re-prints of its 
availability policy disclosures. Small depository institutions that 
already make funds available the next day and do not utilize the 
exceptions for new accounts, large deposits, or repeated overdrafts may 
be less affected by the final rule. The economic impact on small 
entities from the final rule may include technology, labor, and other 
associated costs incurred to update their disclosures with the adjusted 
dollar amounts, if those cannot be accomplished within the 
institution's regular cycle. However, as noted above, the Agencies 
anticipate providing one year between the date of publication in the 
Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts and the date on 
which the adjusted amounts become effective. The Agencies believe that 
this one-year timeframe provides institutions with a sufficient interim 
in which to plan to send their change-in-terms notices in a way that 
minimizes the burden associated with doing so. In addition, depository 
institutions located in American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, 
and Guam will now be required to comply with the provisions in the EFA 
Act and Regulation CC related to funds availability, payment of 
interest, and disclosures to their customers.
    3. Recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance requirements. The final 
rule requires institutions to update their existing EFA Act disclosures 
to their customers with the adjusted dollar amount as well as update 
software that determines availability, as applicable. No other 
additional recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance requirements would 
be required by the proposed rule.
    4. Other Federal rules. The Board has not identified any likely 
duplication, overlap and/or potential conflict between the final rule 
and any other Federal rule.
    5. Significant alternatives to the proposed revisions. As discussed 
above and after reviewing the comments submitted, the Board has not 
identified any significant alternatives that would reduce the 
regulatory burden of this rule on small entities.
    Bureau: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an 
agency to conduct an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) and 
a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) of any rule subject to 
notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements.\30\ These analyses must 
``describe the impact of the proposed rule on small entities.'' \31\ 
Neither an IRFA nor FRFA is required if the agency certifies that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.\32\ The Bureau also is subject to certain 
additional procedures under the RFA involving the convening of a panel 
to consult with small business representatives prior to proposing a 
rule for which an IRFA is required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
    \31\ Id. at 603(a). For purposes of assessing the impacts of the 
final rule on small entities, ``small entities'' is defined in the 
RFA to include small businesses, small not-for-profit organizations, 
and small government jurisdictions. Id. at 601(6). A ``small 
business'' is determined by application of Small Business 
Administration regulations and reference to the North American 
Industry Classification System (NAICS) classifications and size 
standards. Id. at 601(3). A ``small organization'' is any ``not-for-
profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is 
not dominant in its field.'' Id. at 601(4). A ``small governmental 
jurisdiction'' is the government of a city, county, town, township, 
village, school district, or special district with a population of 
less than 50,000. Id. at 601(5).
    \32\ Id. at 605(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the proposed rule stage, the Bureau determined that an IRFA was 
not required because the proposal, if adopted, would not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
For this final rule, the Bureau continues to believe that that 
determination is accurate. As discussed in the Bureau's section 
1022(b)(2) analysis above, the Bureau believes the final rule's 
inflation adjustments hold real expected losses fixed by adjusting for 
inflation the amount of funds that must be made available for 
withdrawal in accordance with the EFA Act and Regulation CC. 
Accordingly, these adjustments for inflation do not introduce costs for 
entities, including small entities, other than the paperwork costs 
discussed below. In addition, the final rule would implement in 
Regulation CC the EGRRCPA extension of the EFA Act's requirements to 
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that 
will be required to comply with Regulation CC due to the EGRRCPA 
amendments to the EFA Act. Thus, the Bureau concludes that a 
substantial number of small entities is not impacted by the proposal to 
implement in Regulation CC the EGRRCPA amendments to the EFA Act.
    The Bureau recognizes that the final rule will have some impact on 
some entities, including those that are small. The Small Business 
Administration (SBA) defines small depository institutions as those 
with less than $550

[[Page 31694]]

million in assets.\33\ Following guidance from the Small Business 
Administration, the Bureau averaged the total assets reported in 
quarterly call reports during quarters 1 through 4 of 2018. The Bureau 
identified 9,460 entities that had average total assets less than $550 
million. These are considered small for the purposes of the RFA. Using 
the methodology outlined in the Board's Paperwork Reduction Act 
analysis, the Bureau estimates that the quinquennial adjustments will 
have an average quinquennial cost of approximately $2,241 for 
depository institutions. The Bureau estimates that about 3% of small 
entities face a significant economic impact from the quinquennial 
information collection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business 
Standards (2016), available at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/getting-started-contractor/make-sure-you-meet-sba-size-standards/table-small-business-size-standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Bureau estimates the impact of all subpart B 
provisions for those covered persons required to comply with subpart B 
of Regulation CC as a result of the amendments the EGRRCPA made to the 
EFA Act. The EGRRCPA amended the EFA Act to extend its application to 
institutions in American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern 
Mariana Islands, and Guam. The Bureau identified five institutions that 
will be required to comply with Regulation CC due to the EGRRCPA 
amendments to the EFA Act.
    Thus, the Bureau concludes that a substantial number of small 
entities is not impacted by the proposal to implement the EGRRCPA 
amendments to the EFA Act in Regulation CC.
    Accordingly, the Bureau Director, by signing below, certifies that 
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    Board: Certain provisions of the final rule contain ``collection of 
information'' requirements within the meaning of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). In accordance with 
the requirements of the PRA, the Board may not conduct or sponsor, and 
the respondent is not required to respond to, an information collection 
unless it displays a currently-valid Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) control number. The OMB control number for the Board is 7100-0235 
and will be extended, with revision. The Board reviewed the final rule 
under the authority delegated to the Board by OMB. The Board invited 
comments on: (a) Whether the collections of information are necessary 
for the proper performance of the Board's functions, including whether 
the information has practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the 
estimates of the burden of the information collections, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Ways to enhance 
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; 
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the information collections on 
respondents, including through the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) Estimates 
of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and 
purchase of services to provide information.
    Eight commenters, including credit unions and credit union trade 
associations, expressed concern regarding the burden imposed on 
institutions to implement the inflation adjustments. Several credit 
union commenters stated that the cost burden imposed on institutions to 
implement the inflation indexing could exceed the Agencies' estimate in 
the proposal, noting in particular the printing and distribution costs 
associated with sending notices to customers of the changes in the 
institutions' funds-availability policies (commonly referred to as 
``change-in-terms'' notices). One commenter specifically voiced concern 
about the disproportionate cost impact on smaller credit unions for 
printing and mailing notices in general and, in specific, the change-
in-terms notice. To reduce that burden, the commenter also urged the 
Agencies to reduce the length of the required funds-availability 
disclosures or permit them to accompany monthly account statements. 
Another commenter suggested reducing burden by establishing an 
exception within the Regulation CC provision, Sec.  229.18(e), that 
requires the change-in-terms notice. Specifically, the commenter 
suggested that an institution not be required to provide a change-in-
terms notice when its funds-availability policy changes due to the 
periodic inflation adjustments to the Regulation CC funds-availability 
dollar amounts that are mandated by section 607(f) of the EFA Act.
    In their final rule, the Agencies decline to establish in 
Regulation CC an exception to the requirement to send a change-in-terms 
notice, as this requirement is established by statute. However, the 
Agencies note several ways that depository institutions may lower their 
costs under the rule, including providing the required notice 
electronically and sending it with the monthly account statement, as 
follows.
    Electronic delivery is permitted where the institution has complied 
with the requirements of the Electronic Signatures in Global and 
National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. (``E-Sign Act'')). See 
comment 229.15(a)-1. Further, the regulation already permits an 
institution to send a required change-in-terms notice on or with a 
monthly account statement, and this is so irrespective of whether the 
institution sends the notice and statement electronically or in paper 
form. See comment 229.18(e)-1 (stating that the change-in-terms notice 
required by Sec.  229.18(e) ``may be given in any form as long as it is 
clear and conspicuous''). In addition, an institution need not set 
forth the entirety of its revised funds-availability policy in its 
change-in-terms notice. If an institution chooses to provide the notice 
by sending a complete new availability disclosure, the institution must 
direct the customer to the changed terms in the disclosure by use of a 
letter or insert, or by highlighting the changed terms in the 
disclosure. See comment 229.18(e)-1. And finally, as discussed above, 
the Agencies anticipate providing one year between the date of 
publication in the Federal Register of the inflation-adjusted amounts 
and the date on which the adjusted amounts become effective. The 
Agencies believe that this one-year timeframe provides institutions 
with a sufficient interim in which to plan to send their change-in-
terms notices in a way that minimizes the burden associated with doing 
so. In light of all of these factors, and given that the inflation 
adjustments are statutorily required and will occur only once every 
five years, the Agencies believe that the burden on institutions to 
send change-in-terms notices reflecting the inflation-adjusted amounts 
is reasonable.
Proposed Information Collection
    Title of Information Collection: Disclosure Requirements Associated 
with Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks (Regulation CC).
    Frequency of Response: Quinquennial.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Respondents: State member banks and uninsured state branches and 
agencies of foreign banks.
    Abstract: Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229) implements the Expedited 
Funds Availability Act of 1987 (EFA Act) and the Check Clearing for the 
21st Century Act of 2003 (Check 21 Act). The EFA Act was enacted to 
provide depositors of checks with prompt funds availability and to 
foster improvements in the check

[[Page 31695]]

collection and return processes. Subpart B of Regulation CC implements 
the EFA Act's funds-availability provisions and specifies availability 
schedules within which banks must make funds available for withdrawal. 
Subpart B also implements the EFA Act's rules regarding exceptions to 
the schedules, disclosure of funds-availability policies, and payment 
of interest.
    Current Action: The Agencies are adding Sec.  229.11 to provide the 
CPI-W calculation methodology, which includes an explanation of how 
annual and cumulative changes (positive or negative) in the CPI-W will 
be taken into account, for the dollar amounts in Sec.  
229.10(c)(1)(vii) regarding the minimum amount, Sec.  229.12(d) for the 
cash withdrawal amount, section 229.13(a) for the new-account amount, 
Sec.  229.13(b) for the large-deposit threshold, Sec.  229.13(d) for 
repeatedly overdrawn threshold, and Sec.  229.21(a) for the civil 
liability amounts.
PRA Burden Estimates
    Number of respondents: 940 respondents (100 respondents for changes 
in policy).
    Estimated average hours per response: Specific availability policy 
disclosure and initial disclosures, .02 hours; Notice in specific 
policy disclosure, .05 hours; Notice of exceptions, .05 hours; 
Locations where employees accept consumer deposits, .25 hours; 
Quinquennial inflation adjustments for disclosures (annualized), 8 
hours; Annual notice of new ATMs, 5 hours; Changes in policy, 20 hours; 
Notification of quinquennial inflation adjustments, 4 hours; Notice of 
nonpayment on paying bank, .02 hours; Notification to customer, .02 
hours; Expedited recredit for consumers, .25 hours; Expedited recredit 
for banks, .25 hours; Consumer awareness, .02 hours; and Expedited 
recredit claim notice, .25 hours.
    Estimated annual burden hours: Specific availability policy 
disclosure and initial disclosures, 9,400 hours; Notice in specific 
policy disclosure, 32,900 hours; Notice of exceptions, 94,000 hours; 
Locations where employees accept consumer deposits, 235 hours; 
Quinquennial inflation adjustments for disclosures (annualized), 7,520 
hours; Annual notice of new ATMs, 4,700 hours; Changes in policy, 4,000 
hours; Notification of quinquennial inflation adjustments, 3,760 hours; 
Notice of nonpayment on paying bank, 658 hours; Notification to 
customer, 6,956 hours; Expedited recredit for consumers, 8,225 hours; 
Expedited recredit for banks, 3,525 hours; Consumer awareness, 5,640 
hours; and Expedited recredit claim notice, 5,875 hours.
    Current Total Estimated Annual Burden: 176,114 hours.
    Proposed Total Estimated Annual Burden: 187,394 hours.
    Bureau: As noted in the proposal, the Bureau was not required to 
seek OMB approval for the information collection requirements already 
accounted for by the Board above, or for which other agencies are 
responsible. Moreover, the Bureau's technical, non-substantive 
amendments to Regulation DD as discussed above in Section II.E do not 
impose any new or additional information collection requirements that 
would require OMB approval.\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ The OMB control number for the information collection 
requirements contained in Regulation DD is 3170-0004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

D. Plain Language Used

    Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Pub. L. 106-102, 113 
Stat. 1338, 1471, 12 U.S.C. 4809) requires the Federal banking agencies 
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after 
January 1, 2000. The Board sought to present the proposed rule in a 
simple and straightforward manner, and invited comment on the use of 
plain language and whether any part of the rule could be more clearly 
stated. No commenters commented on use of plain language in the 
proposed rule, and the Board has adopted proposed plain language in the 
final rule.

E. Interagency Consultations

    The Board and the Bureau have performed interagency consultations 
regarding this final rule consistent with section 609(e) of the EFA 
Act, section 269(a)(1) of TISA, and section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-
Frank Act. Section 609(e) of the EFA Act provides that in prescribing 
regulations under section 609(a), the Board and the Director of the 
Bureau shall consult with the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of 
Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the 
National Credit Union Administration Board.\35\ Section 269(a)(1) of 
TISA provides that in prescribing regulations under section 269(a)(1), 
the Bureau shall consult with each agency referred to in TISA section 
270(a) (12 U.S.C. 4309(a)).\36\ Section 1022(b)(2)(B) of the Dodd-Frank 
Act provides that in prescribing a rule under the Federal consumer 
financial laws, the Bureau shall consult with the appropriate 
prudential regulators or other Federal agencies prior to proposing a 
rule and during the comment process regarding consistency with 
prudential, market, or systemic objectives administered by such 
agencies.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 12 U.S.C. 4008(a).
    \36\ 12 U.S.C. 4308(a)(1).
    \37\ 12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(B). Although the manner and extent to 
which section 1022(b)(2)(B) applies to a rulemaking of this kind is 
unclear, in order to inform this rulemaking more fully, the Bureau 
performed the described consultations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. Bureau Congressional Review Act Statement

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
the Bureau will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to the rule taking 
effect. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has 
designated this rule as not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

List of Subjects in

12 CFR Part 229

    Banks, Banking, Federal Reserve System, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements.

12 CFR Part 1030

    Advertising, Banks, Banking, Consumer protection, National banks, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Board of Governors 
of the Federal Reserve System amends Regulation CC, 12 CFR part 229, as 
set forth below:

PART 229--AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS AND COLLECTIONS OF CHECKS 
(REGULATION CC)

0
1. The authority citation for part 229 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  12 U.S.C. 4001-4010, 12 U.S.C. 5001-5018.

Subpart A--General

* * * * *

0
2. In Sec.  229.1, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  229.1   Authority and purpose; organization.

    (a) Authority and purpose--(1) In general. This part is issued by 
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) to 
implement the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4001-4010) 
(EFA Act) and the

[[Page 31696]]

Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (12 U.S.C. 5001-5018) (Check 21 
Act).
    (2) Joint authority of the Bureau. The Board issues regulations 
under Sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the EFA Act (12 
U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004, 4008(a)) jointly with the Director of 
the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau).
* * * * *

0
3. In Sec.  229.2, revise paragraphs (c), (ff), and (jj) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  229.2  September 1, 2019 Definitions.

* * * * *
    (c) Automated teller machine or ATM means an electronic device 
located in the United States at which a natural person may make 
deposits to an account by cash or check and perform other account 
transactions.
* * * * *
    (ff) State means a state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, 
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, 
or the U.S. Virgin Islands. For purposes of subpart D of this part and, 
in connection therewith, this subpart A, state also means the Trust 
Territory of the Pacific Islands and any other territory of the United 
States.
* * * * *
    (jj) United States means the states, including the District of 
Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of 
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico.
* * * * *

Subpart B--Availability of Funds and Disclosure of Funds 
Availability Policies


Sec.  229.10   [Amended]

0
4. In Sec.  229.10, remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in 
paragraph (c)(1)(vii)(A).

0
5. Add Sec.  229.11 to read as follows:


Sec.  229.11   Adjustment of dollar amounts.

    (a) Dollar amounts indexed. The dollar amounts specified in 
Sec. Sec.  229.10(c)(1)(vii), 229.12(d), 229.13(a), 229.13(b), 
229.13(d), and 229.21(a) shall be adjusted effective on July 1, 2020, 
on July 1, 2025, and on July 1 of every fifth year after 2025, in 
accordance with the procedure set forth in paragraph (b) of this 
section using the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and 
Clerical Workers (CPI-W), as published by the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics.
    (b) Indexing procedure--(1) Inflation measurement periods. For 
dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1, 2020, the 
inflation measurement period begins in July 2011 and ends in July 2018. 
For dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1, 2025, the 
inflation measurement period begins in July 2018 and ends in July 2023. 
For dollar amount adjustments that are effective on July 1 of every 
fifth year after 2025, the inflation measurement period begins in July 
of every fifth year after 2018 and ends in July of every fifth year 
after 2023. Following each inflation measurement period, the dollar 
amount adjustments will be published in the Federal Register.
    (2) Percentage change. Any dollar amount adjustment under this 
section shall be calculated across an inflation measurement period by 
the aggregate percentage change in the CPI-W, including both positive 
and negative percentage changes. The aggregate percentage change over 
the inflation measurement period will be rounded to one decimal place, 
using the CPI-W value for July (which is generally released by the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics in August).
    (3) Adjustment amount. The adjustment amount for each dollar amount 
listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall be equal to the aggregate 
percentage change multiplied by the existing dollar amount listed in 
paragraph (c) of this section and rounded to the nearest multiple of 
$25. The adjusted dollar amount will be equal to the sum of the 
existing dollar amount and the adjustment amount. No dollar adjustment 
will be made when the aggregate percentage change is zero or a negative 
percentage change, or when the aggregate percentage change multiplied 
by the existing dollar amount listed in paragraph (c) and rounded to 
the nearest multiple of $25 results in no change.
    (4) Carry-forward. When there is an aggregate negative percentage 
change over an inflation measurement period, or when an aggregate 
positive percentage change over an inflation measurement period 
multiplied by the existing dollar amount listed in paragraph (c) of 
this section and rounded to the nearest multiple of $25 results in no 
change, the aggregate percentage change over the inflation measurement 
period will be included in the calculation to determine the percentage 
change at the end of the subsequent inflation measurement period. That 
is, the cumulative change in the CPI-W over the two (or more) inflation 
measurement periods will be used in the calculation until the 
cumulative change results in publication of an adjusted dollar amount 
in the regulation.
    (c) Amounts. (1) For purposes of Sec.  229.10(c)(1)(vii), the 
dollar amount in effect during a particular period is the amount stated 
in this paragraph (c)(1) for that period.
    (i) Prior to July 21, 2011, the amount is $100.
    (ii) From July 21, 2011, through June 30, 2020, by operation of 
section 603(a)(2)(D) of the EFA Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(a)(2)(D)) the 
amount is $200.
    (iii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $225.
    (2) For purposes of Sec.  229.12(d), the dollar amount in effect 
during a particular period is the amount stated in this paragraph 
(c)(2) for that period.
    (i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount is $400.
    (ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $450.
    (3) For purposes of Sec.  229.13(a), (b), and (d), the dollar 
amount in effect during a particular period is the amount stated in 
this paragraph (c)(3) for that period.
    (i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amount is $5,000.
    (ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amount is $5,525.
    (4) For purposes of Sec.  229.21(a), the dollar amounts in effect 
during a particular period are the amounts stated in this paragraph 
(c)(4) for the period.
    (i) Prior to July 1, 2020, the amounts are $100, $1,000, and 
$500,000 respectively.
    (ii) Effective July 1, 2020, the amounts are $100, $1,100, and 
$552,500 respectively.

0
6. In Sec.  229.12:
0
a. Remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in paragraph (d); and
0
b. Revise paragraphs (e) introductory text and (e)(1).
    The revisions read as follows:


Sec.  229.12   Availability schedule.

* * * * *
    (e) Extension of schedule for certain deposits in Alaska, Hawaii, 
Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The depositary bank may 
extend the time periods set forth in this section by one business day 
in the case of any deposit, other than a deposit described in Sec.  
229.10, that is--
    (1) Deposited in an account at a branch of a depositary bank if the 
branch is located in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the 
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin 
Islands; and
* * * * *

[[Page 31697]]

Sec.  229.21   [Amended]

0
 7. In Sec.  229.21, remove ``$100'' and add in its place ``$225'' in 
paragraph (a)(2)(i).


Sec.  229.43   [Removed and Reserved]

0
8. Section 229.43 is removed and reserved.

0
9. Amend appendix E to part 229 as follows:
0
a. Remove the dollar amounts in the ``Remove'' column wherever they 
appear and add in their place the dollar amounts in the ``Add'' column 
in the following table:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Section                        Remove        Add
------------------------------------------------------------------------
229.10(c).....................................       $5,000       $5,525
229.12(d).....................................          400          450
229.13(a), (b), and (d).......................        5,000        5,525
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
b. In Section II.D, revise paragraph 1.
0
c. In Section IV.D, revise paragraph 5 and add paragraph 7.
0
d. Section V is revised.
0
e. In Section VI.B, paragraph 4 is added.
0
f In Section VI.E paragraphs 1 and 2 are revised.
0
g. Section VII.C, paragraph 2 is revised and paragraph 4 is added.
0
h. In Section VII.E, paragraph 5 is added.
0
i. In Section VII.H, paragraph 2(b) is revised.
0
j. In Section XIV.C, paragraph 2 is revised.
0
k. In Section XV.A, paragraph 2 is added.
0
l. Section XXIX is removed and reserved.
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Appendix E to Part 229--Commentary

* * * * *

II. Section 229.2 Definitions

* * * * *

D. * * *

    1. ATM is not defined in the EFA Act. The regulation defines an 
ATM as an electronic device located in the United States at which a 
natural person may make deposits to an account by cash or check and 
perform other account transactions. Point-of-sale terminals, 
machines that only dispense cash, night depositories, and lobby 
deposit boxes are not ATMs within the meaning of the definition, 
either because they do not accept deposits of cash or checks (e.g., 
point-of-sale terminals and cash dispensers) or because they only 
accept deposits (e.g., night depositories and lobby boxes) and 
cannot perform other transactions. A lobby deposit box or similar 
receptacle in which written payment orders or deposits may be placed 
is not an ATM.
* * * * *

IV. * * *

D. * * *

5. First $225

    a. The EFA Act and regulation also require that up to $225 of 
the aggregate deposit by check or checks not subject to next-day 
availability on any one banking day be made available on the next 
business day. For example, if $70 were deposited in an account by 
check(s) on a Monday, the entire $70 must be available for 
withdrawal at the start of business on Tuesday. If $400 were 
deposited by check(s) on a Monday, this section requires that $225 
of the funds be available for withdrawal at the start of business on 
Tuesday. The portion of the customer's deposit to which the $225 
must be applied is at the discretion of the depositary bank, as long 
as it is not applied to any checks subject to next-day availability. 
The $225 next-day availability rule does not apply to deposits at 
nonproprietary ATMs.
    b. The $225 that must be made available under this rule is in 
addition to the amount that must be made available for withdrawal on 
the business day after deposit under other provisions of this 
section. For example, if a customer deposits a $1,000 Treasury check 
and a $1,000 local check in its account on Monday, $1,225 must be 
made available for withdrawal on Tuesday--the proceeds of the $1,000 
Treasury check, as well as the first $225 of the local check.
    c. A depositary bank may aggregate all local and nonlocal check 
deposits made by a customer on a given banking day for the purposes 
of the $225 next-day availability rule. Thus, if a customer has two 
accounts at the depositary bank, and on a particular banking day 
makes deposits to each account, $225 of the total deposited to the 
two accounts must be made available on the business day after 
deposit. Banks may aggregate deposits to individual and joint 
accounts for the purposes of this provision.
    d. If the customer deposits a $500 local check and gets $225 
cash back at the time of deposit, the bank need not make an 
additional $225 available for withdrawal on the following day. 
Similarly, if the customer depositing the local check has a negative 
book balance, or negative available balance in its account at the 
time of deposit, the $225 that must be available on the next 
business day may be made available by applying the $225 to the 
negative balance, rather than making the $225 available for 
withdrawal by cash or check on the following day.
* * * * *
    7. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules 
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar 
amounts used in this section.
* * * * *

V. Section 229.11 Adjustment of Dollar Amounts

    1. Example of a positive adjustment. If the CPI-W for July (and 
released in August) of the base year and the adjustment year were 
100 and 114.7, respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the 
period would be 14.7%. If the applicable dollar amount was $200 for 
the prior period, then the adjusted figure would become $225, as the 
change of $29.40 results in rounding to $25.
    2. Example of no adjustment. If the CPI-W for July (and released 
in August) of the base year and the adjustment year were 100 and 
104, respectively, the aggregate percentage change would be 4.0%. If 
the applicable dollar amount was $200 for the prior period, then the 
adjusted figure would remain $200, as the change of $8.00 does not 
result in rounding to $25.
    3. Example of accounting for aggregate decrease in subsequent 
period. If the CPI-W for July (and released in August) of the base 
year and the adjustment year were 100 and 95, respectively, the 
aggregate percentage change would be -5%, and no adjustment to the 
dollar amounts would occur. The CPI-W for July (and released in 
August) of the base year would be the starting point for calculating 
any CPI-W increase across subsequent five-year periods. Therefore, 
if the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the base year and 
the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the years at the end 
of the next two five-year periods were 100, 95, and 109, 
respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the entire period 
would be 9.0%. If the applicable dollar amount was $5,000 for the 
prior period, then the adjusted figure would become $5,450 as the 
change of $450 does not require rounding because it is a multiple of 
$25.
    4. Example of accounting for aggregate lack of dollar amount 
change in subsequent period. If the CPI-W for July (and released in 
August) of the base year and the year at the end of the subsequent 
five-year period were 100 and 105, respectively, the aggregate 
change over the five-year period would be 5%, and no adjustment to 
the $200 amount would occur, as the change of $10 does not result in 
rounding to $225. Nonetheless, the CPI-W for July (and released in 
August) of the base year would be the starting point for calculating 
any CPI-W percentage increase across the subsequent five-year 
period. Therefore, if the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of 
the base year and the CPI-W in July (and released in August) of the 
years at the end of the next two five-year periods were 100, 105, 
and 112.6, respectively, the aggregate percentage change for the 
entire period would be 12.6%. If the applicable dollar amount was 
$200 for the prior period, then the adjusted figure would become 
$225 as the change of $25.20 results in rounding to $225, the 
nearest multiple of $25.

VI. * * *

B. 229.12(d) Time Period Adjustment for Withdrawal by Cash or 
Similar Means

* * * * *
    4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules 
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar 
amounts in this section.
* * * * *

E. 229.12(e) Extension of Schedule for Certain Deposits in Alaska, 
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands

    1. The EFA Act and regulation provide an extension of the 
availability schedules for

[[Page 31698]]

check deposits at a branch of a bank if the branch is located in 
Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the 
Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands. The 
schedules for local checks, nonlocal checks (including nonlocal 
checks subject to the reduced schedules of appendix B), and deposits 
at nonproprietary ATMs are extended by one business day for checks 
deposited to accounts in banks located in these jurisdictions that 
are drawn on or payable at or through a paying bank not located in 
the same jurisdiction as the depositary bank. For example, a check 
deposited in a bank in Hawaii and drawn on a San Francisco paying 
bank must be made available for withdrawal not later than the third 
business day following deposit. This extension does not apply to 
deposits that must be made available for withdrawal on the next 
business day.
    2. The Congress did not provide this extension of the schedules 
to checks drawn on a paying bank located in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 
Islands, Guam, or the U.S. Virgin Islands and deposited in an 
account at a depositary bank in the 48 contiguous states. Therefore, 
a check deposited in a San Francisco bank drawn on a Hawaii paying 
bank must be made available for withdrawal not later than the second 
rather than the third business day following deposit.

VII. Section 229.13 Exceptions

B. * * *

    4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules 
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar 
amounts in this section.

C. * * *

    2. The following example illustrates the operation of the large-
deposit exception. If a customer deposits $2,000 in cash and a 
$9,000 local check on a Monday, $2,225 (the proceeds of the cash 
deposit and $225 from the local-check deposit) must be made 
available for withdrawal on Tuesday. An additional $5,300 of the 
proceeds of the local check must be available for withdrawal on 
Wednesday in accordance with the local schedule, and the remaining 
$3,475 may be held for an additional period of time under the large-
deposit exception.
* * * * *
    4. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules 
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar 
amounts in this section.
* * * * *

E. * * *

    5. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the 
calculation method used to adjust the dollar amounts in this section 
every five years.
* * * * *

H. * * *

2. * * *

    b. In the case of a deposit of multiple checks, the depositary 
bank has the discretion to place an exception hold on any 
combination of checks in excess of $5,525. The notice should enable 
a customer to determine the availability of the deposit in the case 
of a deposit of multiple checks. For example, if a customer deposits 
a $5,525 local check and a $5,525 nonlocal check, under the large-
deposit exception, the depositary bank may make funds available in 
the amount of (1) $225 on the first business day after deposit, 
$5,300 on the second business day after deposit (local check), and 
$5,525 on the eleventh business day after deposit (nonlocal check 
with six-day exception hold), or (2) $225 on the first business day 
after deposit, $5,300 on the fifth business day after deposit 
(nonlocal check), and $5,525 on the seventh business day after 
deposit (local check with five-day exception hold). The notice 
should reflect the bank's priorities in placing exception holds on 
next-day (or second-day), local, and nonlocal checks.
* * * * *

XIV. Section 229.20 Relation to State Law

* * * * *

C. * * *

    2. Under a state law, some categories of deposits could be 
available for withdrawal sooner or later than the time required by 
this subpart, depending on the composition of the deposit. For 
example, the EFA Act and this regulation (Sec.  229.10(c)(1)(vii)) 
require next-day availability for the first $225 of the aggregate 
deposit of local or nonlocal checks on any day, and a state law 
could require next-day availability for any check of $200 or less 
that is deposited. Under the EFA Act and this regulation, if either 
one $300 check or three $100 checks are deposited on a given day, 
$225 must be made available for withdrawal on the next business day, 
and $75 must be made available in accordance with the local or 
nonlocal schedule. Under the state law, however, the two deposits 
would be subject to different availability rules. In the first case, 
none of the proceeds of the deposit would be subject to next-day 
availability; in the second case, the entire proceeds of the deposit 
would be subject to next-day availability. In this example, because 
the state law would, in some situations, permit a hold longer than 
the maximum permitted by the EFA Act, this provision of state law is 
inconsistent and preempted in its entirety.
* * * * *

XV. Section 229.21 Civil Liability

A. * * *

    2. Dollar Amount Adjustment--See section 229.11 for the rules 
regarding adjustments for inflation every five years to the dollar 
amounts in this section.
* * * * *

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection

Authority and Issuance

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Bureau of Consumer 
Financial Protection amends Regulation DD, 12 CFR part 1030, as 
follows:

PART 1030--TRUTH IN SAVINGS (REGULATION DD)

0
10. The authority citation for part 1030 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 12 U.S.C. 4302-4304, 4308, 5512, 5581.

0
11. In Sec.  1030.1, paragraph (e) is added to read as follows:


Sec.  1030.1   Authority, purpose, coverage, and effect on state laws.

* * * * *
    (e) Relationship to Regulation CC. The Director of the Bureau and 
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System jointly issue 
regulations under sections 603(d)(1), 604, 605, and 609(a) of the 
Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4002(d)(1), 4003, 4004, 
4008(a)) that are codified within Regulation CC (12 CFR part 229).

0
12. In Sec.  1030.7, paragraph (c) is revised to read as follows:


Sec.  1030.7   Payment of interest.

* * * * *
    (c) Date interest begins to accrue. Interest shall begin to accrue 
not later than the business day specified for interest-bearing accounts 
in section 606 of the Expedited Funds Availability Act (12 U.S.C. 4005) 
and in Sec.  229.14 of that act's implementing Regulation CC (12 CFR 
part 229). Interest shall accrue until the day funds are withdrawn.

0
13. Appendix A to part 1030 is revised to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 1030--Annual Percentage Yield Calculation

    The annual percentage yield measures the total amount of 
interest paid on an account based on the interest rate and the 
frequency of compounding. The annual percentage yield reflects only 
interest and does not include the value of any bonus (or other 
consideration worth $10 or less) that may be provided to the 
consumer to open, maintain, increase or renew an account. Interest 
or other earnings are not to be included in the annual percentage 
yield if such amounts are determined by circumstances that may or 
may not occur in the future. The annual percentage yield is 
expressed as an annualized rate, based on a 365-day year. 
Institutions may calculate the annual percentage yield based on a 
365-day or a 366-day year in a leap year. Part I of this appendix 
discusses the annual percentage yield calculations for account 
disclosures and advertisements, while part II discusses annual 
percentage yield earned calculations for periodic statements.

Part I. Annual Percentage Yield for Account Disclosures and Advertising 
Purposes

    In general, the annual percentage yield for account disclosures 
under Sec. Sec.  1030.4 and 1030.5 and for advertising under Sec.  
1030.8 is an annualized rate that reflects the relationship between 
the amount of interest

[[Page 31699]]

that would be earned by the consumer for the term of the account and 
the amount of principal used to calculate that interest. Special 
rules apply to accounts with tiered and stepped interest rates, and 
to certain time accounts with a stated maturity greater than one 
year.

A. General Rules

    Except as provided in part I.E. of this appendix, the annual 
percentage yield shall be calculated by the formula shown below. 
Institutions shall calculate the annual percentage yield based on 
the actual number of days in the term of the account. For accounts 
without a stated maturity date (such as a typical savings or 
transaction account), the calculation shall be based on an assumed 
term of 365 days. In determining the total interest figure to be 
used in the formula, institutions shall assume that all principal 
and interest remain on deposit for the entire term and that no other 
transactions (deposits or withdrawals) occur during the term. This 
assumption shall not be used if an institution requires, as a 
condition of the account, that consumers withdraw interest during 
the term. In such a case, the interest (and annual percentage yield 
calculation) shall reflect that requirement. For time accounts that 
are offered in multiples of months, institutions may base the number 
of days on either the actual number of days during the applicable 
period, or the number of days that would occur for any actual 
sequence of that many calendar months. If institutions choose to use 
the latter rule, they must use the same number of days to calculate 
the dollar amount of interest earned on the account that is used in 
the annual percentage yield formula (where ``Interest'' is divided 
by ``Principal'').
    The annual percentage yield is calculated by use of the 
following general formula (``APY'' is used for convenience in the 
formulas):

APY=100 [(1+Interest/Principal)(365/Days in term)-1]

    ``Principal'' is the amount of funds assumed to have been 
deposited at the beginning of the account.
    ``Interest'' is the total dollar amount of interest earned on 
the Principal for the term of the account.
    ``Days in term'' is the actual number of days in the term of the 
account. When the ``days in term'' is 365 (that is, where the stated 
maturity is 365 days or where the account does not have a stated 
maturity), the annual percentage yield can be calculated by use of 
the following simple formula:

APY=100 (Interest/Principal)

    Examples:
    (1) If an institution pays $61.68 in interest for a 365-day year 
on $1,000 deposited into a NOW account, using the general formula 
above, the annual percentage yield is 6.17%:

APY=100[(1+61.68/1,000)(365/365)-1]
APY=6.17%

    Or, using the simple formula above (since, as an account without 
a stated term, the term is deemed to be 365 days):

APY=100(61.68/1,000)
APY=6.17%

    (2) If an institution pays $30.37 in interest on a $1,000 six-
month certificate of deposit (where the six-month period used by the 
institution contains 182 days), using the general formula above, the 
annual percentage yield is 6.18%:

APY=100[(1+30.37/1,000)(365/182)-1]
APY=6.18%

B. Stepped-Rate Accounts (Different Rates Apply in Succeeding 
Periods)

    For accounts with two or more interest rates applied in 
succeeding periods (where the rates are known at the time the 
account is opened), an institution shall assume each interest rate 
is in effect for the length of time provided for in the deposit 
contract.
    Examples:
    (1) If an institution offers a $1,000 6-month certificate of 
deposit on which it pays a 5% interest rate, compounded daily, for 
the first three months (which contain 91 days), and a 5.5% interest 
rate, compounded daily, for the next three months (which contain 92 
days), the total interest for six months is $26.68 and, using the 
general formula above, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:

APY=100[(1+26.68/1,000)(365/183)-1]
APY=5.39%

    (2) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year certificate of 
deposit on which it pays a 6% interest rate, compounded daily, for 
the first year, and a 6.5% interest rate, compounded daily, for the 
next year, the total interest for two years is $133.13, and, using 
the general formula above, the annual percentage yield is 6.45%:

APY=100[(1+133.13/1,000)(365/730)-1]
APY=6.45%

C. Variable-Rate Accounts

    For variable-rate accounts without an introductory premium or 
discounted rate, an institution must base the calculation only on 
the initial interest rate in effect when the account is opened (or 
advertised), and assume that this rate will not change during the 
year.
    Variable-rate accounts with an introductory premium (or 
discount) rate must be calculated like a stepped-rate account. Thus, 
an institution shall assume that:
    (1) The introductory interest rate is in effect for the length 
of time provided for in the deposit contract; and
    (2) The variable interest rate that would have been in effect 
when the account is opened or advertised (but for the introductory 
rate) is in effect for the remainder of the year. If the variable 
rate is tied to an index, the index-based rate in effect at the time 
of disclosure must be used for the remainder of the year. If the 
rate is not tied to an index, the rate in effect for existing 
consumers holding the same account (who are not receiving the 
introductory interest rate) must be used for the remainder of the 
year.
    For example, if an institution offers an account on which it 
pays a 7% interest rate, compounded daily, for the first three 
months (which, for example, contain 91 days), while the variable 
interest rate that would have been in effect when the account was 
opened was 5%, the total interest for a 365-day year for a $1,000 
deposit is $56.52 (based on 91 days at 7% followed by 274 days at 
5%). Using the simple formula, the annual percentage yield is 5.65%:

APY=100(56.52/1,000)
APY=5.65%

D. Tiered-Rate Accounts (Different Rates Apply to Specified Balance 
Levels)

    For accounts in which two or more interest rates paid on the 
account are applicable to specified balance levels, the institution 
must calculate the annual percentage yield in accordance with the 
method described below that it uses to calculate interest. In all 
cases, an annual percentage yield (or a range of annual percentage 
yields, if appropriate) must be disclosed for each balance tier.
    For purposes of the examples discussed below, assume the 
following:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Deposit balance required to earn
        Interest rate (percent)                       rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.25..................................  Up to but not exceeding $2,500.
5.50..................................  Above $2,500 but not exceeding
                                         $15,000.
5.75..................................  Above $15,000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Tiering Method A. (1) Under this method, an institution pays on 
the full balance in the account the stated interest rate that 
corresponds to the applicable deposit tier. For example, if a 
consumer deposits $8,000, the institution pays the 5.50% interest 
rate on the entire $8,000.
    When this method is used to determine interest, only one annual 
percentage yield will apply to each tier. Within each tier, the 
annual percentage yield will not vary with the amount of principal 
assumed to have been deposited.
    For the interest rates and deposit balances assumed above, the 
institution will state three annual percentage yields--one 
corresponding to each balance tier. Calculation of each annual 
percentage yield is similar for this type of account as for accounts 
with a single interest rate. Thus, the calculation is based on the 
total amount of interest that would be received by the consumer for 
each tier of the account for a year and the principal assumed to 
have been deposited to earn that amount of interest.
    First tier. Assuming daily compounding, the institution will pay 
$53.90 in interest on a $1,000 deposit. Using the general formula, 
for the first tier, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:

APY=100[(1+53.90/1,000)(365/365)-1]
APY=5.39%
    Using the simple formula:

APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%

    Second tier. The institution will pay $452.29 in interest on an 
$8,000 deposit. Thus, using the simple formula, the annual 
percentage yield for the second tier is 5.65%:

APY=100(452.29/8,000)
APY=5.65%

    Third tier. The institution will pay $1,183.61 in interest on a 
$20,000 deposit. Thus, using the simple formula, the annual 
percentage yield for the third tier is 5.92%:

APY=100(1,183.61/20,000)

[[Page 31700]]

APY=5.92%

    Tiering Method B. Under this method, an institution pays the 
stated interest rate only on that portion of the balance within the 
specified tier. For example, if a consumer deposits $8,000, the 
institution pays 5.25% on $2,500 and 5.50% on $5,500 (the difference 
between $8,000 and the first tier cut-off of $2,500).
    The institution that computes interest in this manner must 
provide a range that shows the lowest and the highest annual 
percentage yields for each tier (other than for the first tier, 
which, like the tiers in Method A, has the same annual percentage 
yield throughout). The low figure for an annual percentage yield 
range is calculated based on the total amount of interest earned for 
a year assuming the minimum principal required to earn the interest 
rate for that tier. The high figure for an annual percentage yield 
range is based on the amount of interest the institution would pay 
on the highest principal that could be deposited to earn that same 
interest rate. If the account does not have a limit on the maximum 
amount that can be deposited, the institution may assume any amount.
    For the tiering structure assumed above, the institution would 
state a total of five annual percentage yields--one figure for the 
first tier and two figures stated as a range for the other two 
tiers.
    First tier. Assuming daily compounding, the institution would 
pay $53.90 in interest on a $1,000 deposit. For this first tier, 
using the simple formula, the annual percentage yield is 5.39%:

APY=100(53.90/1,000)
APY=5.39%

    Second tier. For the second tier, the institution would pay 
between $134.75 and $841.45 in interest, based on assumed balances 
of $2,500.01 and $15,000, respectively. For $2,500.01, interest 
would be figured on $2,500 at 5.25% interest rate plus interest on 
$.01 at 5.50%. For the low end of the second tier, therefore, the 
annual percentage yield is 5.39%, using the simple formula:

APY=100(134.75/2,500)
APY=5.39%

    For $15,000, interest is figured on $2,500 at 5.25% interest 
rate plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50% interest rate. For the high 
end of the second tier, the annual percentage yield, using the 
simple formula, is 5.61%:

APY=100(841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%

    Thus, the annual percentage yield range for the second tier is 
5.39% to 5.61%.
    Third tier. For the third tier, the institution would pay 
$841.45 in interest on the low end of the third tier (a balance of 
$15,000.01). For $15,000.01, interest would be figured on $2,500 at 
5.25% interest rate, plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50% interest 
rate, plus interest on $.01 at 5.75% interest rate. For the low end 
of the third tier, therefore, the annual percentage yield (using the 
simple formula) is 5.61%:

APY=100 (841.45/15,000)
APY=5.61%

    Since the institution does not limit the account balance, it may 
assume any maximum amount for the purposes of computing the annual 
percentage yield for the high end of the third tier. For an assumed 
maximum balance amount of $100,000, interest would be figured on 
$2,500 at 5.25% interest rate, plus interest on $12,500 at 5.50% 
interest rate, plus interest on $85,000 at 5.75% interest rate. For 
the high end of the third tier, therefore, the annual percentage 
yield, using the simple formula, is 5.87%.

APY=100 (5,871.79/100,000)
APY=5.87%

    Thus, the annual percentage yield range that would be stated for 
the third tier is 5.61% to 5.87%.
    If the assumed maximum balance amount is $1,000,000 instead of 
$100,000, the institution would use $985,000 rather than $85,000 in 
the last calculation. In that case, for the high end of the third 
tier the annual percentage yield, using the simple formula, is 
5.91%:

APY=100 (59134.22/1,000,000)
APY=5.91%

    Thus, the annual percentage yield range that would be stated for 
the third tier is 5.61% to 5.91%.

E. Time Accounts With a Stated Maturity Greater Than One Year That 
Pay Interest at Least Annually

    1. For time accounts with a stated maturity greater than one 
year that do not compound interest on an annual or more frequent 
basis, and that require the consumer to withdraw interest at least 
annually, the annual percentage yield may be disclosed as equal to 
the interest rate.

Example

    (1) If an institution offers a $1,000 two-year certificate of 
deposit that does not compound and that pays out interest semi-
annually by check or transfer at a 6.00% interest rate, the annual 
percentage yield may be disclosed as 6.00%.
    (2) For time accounts covered by this paragraph that are also 
stepped-rate accounts, the annual percentage yield may be disclosed 
as equal to the composite interest rate.

Example

    (1) If an institution offers a $1,000 three-year certificate of 
deposit that does not compound and that pays out interest annually 
by check or transfer at a 5.00% interest rate for the first year, 
6.00% interest rate for the second year, and 7.00% interest rate for 
the third year, the institution may compute the composite interest 
rate and APY as follows:
    (a) Multiply each interest rate by the number of days it will be 
in effect;
    (b) Add these figures together; and
    (c) Divide by the total number of days in the term.
    (2) Applied to the example, the products of the interest rates 
and days the rates are in effect are (5.00%x365 days) 1825, 
(6.00%x365 days) 2190, and (7.00%x365 days) 2555, respectively. The 
sum of these products, 6570, is divided by 1095, the total number of 
days in the term. The composite interest rate and APY are both 
6.00%.

Part II. Annual Percentage Yield Earned for Periodic Statements

    The annual percentage yield earned for periodic statements under 
Sec.  1030.6(a) is an annualized rate that reflects the relationship 
between the amount of interest actually earned on the consumer's 
account during the statement period and the average daily balance in 
the account for the statement period. Pursuant to Sec.  1030.6(b), 
however, if an institution uses the average daily balance method and 
calculates interest for a period other than the statement period, 
the annual percentage yield earned shall reflect the relationship 
between the amount of interest earned and the average daily balance 
in the account for that other period.
    The annual percentage yield earned shall be calculated by using 
the following formulas (``APY Earned'' is used for convenience in 
the formulas):

A. General Formula

    APY Earned=100 [(1+Interest earned/
Balance)(365/Days in period)-1]
    ``Balance'' is the average daily balance in the account for the 
period.
    ``Interest earned'' is the actual amount of interest earned on 
the account for the period.
    ``Days in period'' is the actual number of days for the period.

Examples

    (1) Assume an institution calculates interest for the statement 
period (and uses either the daily balance or the average daily 
balance method), and the account has a balance of $1,500 for 15 days 
and a balance of $500 for the remaining 15 days of a 30-day 
statement period. The average daily balance for the period is 
$1,000. The interest earned (under either balance computation 
method) is $5.25 during the period. The annual percentage yield 
earned (using the formula above) is 6.58%:

APY Earned=100 [(1+5.25/1,000)(365/30)-1]
APY Earned=6.58%

    (2) Assume an institution calculates interest on the average 
daily balance for the calendar month and provides periodic 
statements that cover the period from the 16th of one month to the 
15th of the next month. The account has a balance of $2,000 
September 1 through September 15 and a balance of $1,000 for the 
remaining 15 days of September. The average daily balance for the 
month of September is $1,500, which results in $6.50 in interest 
earned for the month. The annual percentage yield earned for the 
month of September would be shown on the periodic statement covering 
September 16 through October 15. The annual percentage yield earned 
(using the formula above) is 5.40%:

APY Earned=100 [(6.50/1,500)(365/30)-1]
APY Earned=5.40%

    (3) Assume an institution calculates interest on the average 
daily balance for a quarter (for example, the calendar months of 
September through November), and provides monthly periodic 
statements covering calendar months. The account has a balance of 
$1,000 throughout the 30 days of September, a balance of $2,000 
throughout the 31 days of October, and a balance of

[[Page 31701]]

$3,000 throughout the 30 days of November. The average daily balance 
for the quarter is $2,000, which results in $21 in interest earned 
for the quarter. The annual percentage yield earned would be shown 
on the periodic statement for November. The annual percentage yield 
earned (using the formula above) is 4.28%:

APY Earned=100 [(1+21/2,000) (365/91)-1]
APY Earned=4.28%

B. Special Formula for Use Where Periodic Statement Is Sent More 
Often Than the Period for Which Interest Is Compounded

    Institutions that use the daily balance method to accrue 
interest and that issue periodic statements more often than the 
period for which interest is compounded shall use the following 
special formula:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03JY19.001

    The following definition applies for use in this formula (all 
other terms are defined under part II):
    ``Compounding'' is the number of days in each compounding 
period.
    Assume an institution calculates interest for the statement 
period using the daily balance method, pays a 5.00% interest rate, 
compounded annually, and provides periodic statements for each 
monthly cycle. The account has a daily balance of $1,000 for a 30-
day statement period. The interest earned is $4.11 for the period, 
and the annual percentage yield earned (using the special formula 
above) is 5.00%:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR03JY19.002

APY Earned=5.00%


0
14. In Supplement I to part 1030, under Section 1030.7--Payment of 
Interest, paragraph 7(c)--Date interest begins to accrue is revised to 
read as follows:

Supplement I to Part 1030--Official Interpretations

* * * * *

Section 1030.7--Payment of Interest

* * * * *
    (c) Date interest begins to accrue.
    1. Relation to Regulation CC. Institutions may rely on the 
Expedited Funds Availability Act (EFAA) and Regulation CC (12 CFR 
part 229) to determine, for example, when a deposit is considered 
made for purposes of interest accrual, or when interest need not be 
paid on funds because a deposited check is later returned unpaid.
    2. Ledger and collected balances. Institutions may calculate 
interest by using a ``ledger'' or ``collected'' balance method, as 
long as the crediting requirements of the EFAA are met (12 CFR 
229.14).
    3. Withdrawal of principal. Institutions must accrue interest on 
funds until the funds are withdrawn from the account. For example, 
if a check is debited to an account on a Tuesday, the institution 
must accrue interest on those funds through Monday.
* * * * *

    By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, June 20, 2019.
Ann E. Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
    Dated: June 10, 2019.
Kathleen L. Kraninger,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2019-13668 Filed 7-1-19; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P