[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 120 (Friday, June 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29262-29267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13115]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-86126; File No. SR-NYSENAT-2019-14]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE National, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Schedule of Fees and Rebates
June 17, 2019.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 3, 2019, NYSE National, Inc. (``NYSE National'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees and Rebates to
revise the quoting requirements in order for ETP Holders to qualify for
Adding Tier 1, Adding Tier 2 and Adding Tier 3 fees. The Exchange also
proposes non-substantive changes to the presentation of the Adding
Tiers. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website
at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees and Rebates
(``Fee Schedule'') to reduce the number of securities in which an ETP
Holder must quote to qualify for Adding Tier 1, Adding Tier 2 and
Adding Tier 3 fees. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to lower the
number of securities in which an ETP Holder must quote to qualify for
Adding Tiers 1-3 by 50 securities across the board. The Exchange also
proposes non-substantive changes to the presentation of the Adding
Tiers on the Fee Schedule. The Exchange proposes to implement the rule
change on June 3, 2019.
Background
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining
prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation
of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting
market competition in its broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Commission itself recognized, the market for trading
services in NMS stocks has become ``more fragmented and competitive.''
\4\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 13
exchanges,\5\ 32 alternative trading systems,\6\ and numerous broker-
dealer internalizers and wholesalers. Based on publicly-available
information, no single exchange has more than 18% of the market share
of executed volume of equity trades (whether excluding or including
auction volume).\7\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of equity order flow. More specifically,
in May 2019, the Exchange had 1.3% market share of executed volume of
equity trades (excluding auction volume).\8\ The Exchange believes that
the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or
discontinue to reduce use of certain categories of products, in
response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain the
Exchange's transaction fees, and market participants can readily trade
on competing venues if they deem pricing levels at those other venues
to be more favorable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 84 FR 5202,
5253 (February 20, 2019) (File No. S7-05-18) (Transaction Fee Pilot
for NMS Stocks Final Rule) (``Transaction Fee Pilot'').
\5\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary
(May 31, 2019), available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
\6\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data (May 6, 2019), available at
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData.
Although 54 alternative trading systems were registered with the
Commission as of April 30, 2019, only 32 are currently trading. A
list of alternative trading systems registered with the Commission
is available at https://www.sec.gov/files/data/alternative-trading-system-ats-list/atslist043019.pdf.
\7\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary
(May 31, 2019), available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange utilizes a ``taker-maker'' or inverted fee model to
attract orders that provide liquidity at the most competitive prices.
Under the taker-maker model, offering rebates for taking liquidity
increases the likelihood that market participants will send orders to
the Exchange to trade with liquidity providers' orders. This increased
taker order flow provides an incentive for market participants to send
orders that provide liquidity. The Exchange charges fees for order flow
that provides liquidity. These fees are reasonable due
[[Page 29263]]
to the additional marketable interest (in part attracted by the
exchange's rebate to remove liquidity) with which those order flow
providers can trade.
The Exchange sets forth the fees it charges for adding liquidity in
four Adding Tiers that establish minimum quoting or volume requirements
that an ETP Holder must satisfy in order to be eligible for specific
corresponding fees. These quoting and volume requirements are based on
the type of liquidity (i.e., displayed, non-displayed, BBO setting, or
MPL) and the type of security (i.e., whether it is a Tape A, B or C
security). In addition, the Exchange offers two ``step up'' Adding
Tiers that do not have quoting or minimum volume requirements but
require ETP Holders to provide additional incremental liquidity, thus
``stepping up'' their liquidity provision, in order to qualify for
better pricing based on smaller amounts of liquidity than are required
to qualify for Adding Tiers 1-3. The different tiers are designed to
provide an incentive for order flow providers to add liquidity on the
Exchange because the fees are lower for the tiers that have higher
quoting or volume requirements. ETP Holders that do not send order flow
to the Exchange to qualify for the Adding Tier rates would receive the
rates set forth under item A (General Rates) of the Fee Schedule.
To respond to this competitive environment, the Exchange proposes
to adjust its pricing to reduce the number of securities in which an
ETP Holder must quote in order to qualify for the Adding Tier 1-3 fees.
The Exchange's market share of intraday trading (i.e., excluding
auctions) declined from 1.5% for the month of March 2019 to 1.3% for
the month of May 2019.\9\ The proposed fee change is designed to
attract additional order flow to the Exchange by making it easier to
qualify for the respective tiered rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule Change
As described in more detail below, in order to qualify for the
Adding Tiers 1-3 fees, an ETP Holder must be quoting at a price that is
equal to the NBBO a specified percentage of the time, in a specific
number of securities.\10\ The Exchange proposes to lower the number of
securities in which an ETP Holder must quote to qualify for Adding
Tiers 1-3 by 50 securities across the board. Without having a view of
ETP Holder's activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange believes that this reduction in the number of securities would
be significant enough to incentivize market participants to increase
their quoting on the Exchange to meet the new lower requirement, and
thus be eligible for lower fees, and submit additional adding liquidity
to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The Adding Tier 4 volume requirements are currently waived.
See footnote * in the current Fee Schedule. The Exchange proposes no
changes to Adding Tier 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding Tier 1
Under current Adding Tier 1, ETP Holders that add liquidity to the
Exchange in securities with a per share price of $1.00 or more and
that:
(i) Quote at the NBBO \11\ at least 5% of the time in 1,000 or more
securities on an average daily basis, calculated monthly, and have an
average daily volume (``ADV'') of adding liquidity as a percentage of
US consolidated ADV (``CADV'') of 0.20% or more, or
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See footnote ** in the current Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) quote at the NBBO at least 5% of the time in 2,500 or more
securities on an average daily basis, calculated monthly, and have an
ADV of adding liquidity as a percentage of US CADV of 0.10% or more,
would be charged the following fees:
$0.0008 per share for adding displayed orders in Tape B
and C securities and $0.0011 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0008 per share for orders that set a new Exchange BBO
in Tape B and C securities and $0.0011 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0010 per share for adding non-displayed orders in Tape
B and C securities and $0.0013 per share in Tape A securities; and
$0.0005 per share for MPL orders.
The Exchange proposes to amend the quoting requirements for both
alternative methods described in (i) and (ii) above to qualify for the
tier by reducing the number of securities in which the ETP Holder must
quote. As proposed, the first alternative would require ETP Holders to
quote at least 5% of the time at the NBBO in 950 (instead of 1,000) or
more securities on an average daily basis, calculated monthly, while
the second would require ETP Holders to quote at least 5% of the time
at the NBBO in 2,450 (instead of 2,500) or more securities on an
average daily basis, calculated monthly. The fees charged under the
Adding Tier 1 would not change.
Adding Tier 2
Under current Adding Tier 2, ETP Holders that add liquidity to the
Exchange in securities with a per share price of $1.00 or more and that
quote at least 5% of the time at the NBBO in 2000 or more securities on
an average daily basis, calculated monthly, and have an ADV of adding
liquidity as a percentage of US CADV of 0.10% or more, are charged the
following fees:
$0.0012 per share for adding displayed orders in Tape B
and C securities and $0.0015 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0012 per share for orders that set a new Exchange BBO
in Tape B and C securities and $0.0015 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0014 per share for adding non-displayed orders in Tape
B and C securities and $0.0017 per share in Tape A securities; and
$0.0005 per share for MPL orders, which would remain
unchanged.
The Exchange proposes to reduce the number of securities in which
the ETP Holder must quote to qualify for the tier, and would require
ETP Holders to quote at least 5% of the time at the NBBO in 1,950
(instead of 2,000) or more securities on an average daily basis,
calculated monthly. The fees charged under the Adding Tier 2 would not
change.
Adding Tier 3
Under current Adding Tier 3, ETP Holders that add liquidity to the
Exchange in stocks with a per share price of $1.00 or more and that
quote at least 5% of the NBBO in 600 or more securities on an average
daily basis, calculated monthly, are charged the following fees:
$0.0015 per share for adding displayed orders in Tape B
and C securities and $0.0017 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0015 per share for orders that set a new Exchange BBO
in Tape B and C securities and $0.0017 per share in Tape A securities;
$0.0017 per share for adding non-displayed orders in Tape
B and C securities and $0.0019 per share in Tape A securities; and
$0.0005 per share for MPL orders, which would remain
unchanged.
The Exchange proposes to reduce the number of securities in which
the ETP Holder must quote to qualify for the tier by 50, and would
require ETP Holders to quote at least 5% of the NBBO in 550 (instead of
600) or more securities on an average daily basis, calculated monthly.
The fees charged under the Adding Tier 3 would not change.
Application of Proposed Fee Change
The proposed rule change is designed to provide order flow
providers with an incentive to route liquidity-providing order flow to
the Exchange. As described above, ETP Holders with liquidity-providing
order flow have a
[[Page 29264]]
choice of where to send that order flow. The Exchange believes that if
it reduces the requirements to qualify for tiers that have lower
charges, more ETP Holders will choose to route their liquidity-
providing order flow to the Exchange to qualify for those tiers. The
Exchange cannot predict with certainty how many ETP Holders would avail
themselves of this opportunity, but believes that more than 12 ETP
Holders could qualify for these tiers if they so choose.\12\ Additional
liquidity-providing order flow benefits all market participants because
it provides greater execution opportunities on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ In the month of May 2019, 12 ETP Holders quoted at least 5%
of the time at the NBBO in at least 10 securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, assume an ETP Holder averages an ADV of 17.5 million
shares of adding liquidity in a month where a billing month of US CADV
is 7 billion, or 0.25% of CADV. If that ETP Holder quotes at least 5%
of the NBBO in 975 securities on an average daily basis, calculated
monthly, that ETP Holder would meet the proposed requirement of at
least 950 securities to qualify for Adding Tier 1. Prior to the
proposed change, that ETP Holder would fall short of the requirement
for Tier 1, and would have instead qualified for Adding Tier 3. With
this proposed change, this ETP Holder would now be eligible for Adding
Tier 1 fees, which, except for MPL Adding fees, are lower than the
Adding Tier 3 fees. The Exchange believes that charging lower fees
would create an incentive for liquidity providers to direct order flow
to the Exchange, which in turn would create additional execution
opportunities for all market participants.
Proposed Non-Substantive Changes
The Exchange also proposes a non-substantive change to the
presentation of the Adding Tiers under item B (Tiered Rates) of the Fee
Schedule. The Exchange proposes a horizontal presentation similar to
the presentation of the Taking Tiers rather than the current vertical
presentation. The Exchange also proposes to simplify the presentation
by using sub-titles to identify the type of liquidity (i.e., displayed,
non-displayed, BBO setting, and MPL) and then listing the corresponding
fees under each category. The proposed substantive changes described
above would be included in the new presentation of the Tiered Rates.
The proposed changes would appear as follows in the Fee Schedule:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier requirement Adding fees (per share)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding Tier 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Either: Displayed liquidity:
(i) at least 5% of the NBBO ** in 950 or more --Tapes B and C: $0.0008.
symbols on an average daily basis, --Tape A: $0.0011.
calculated monthly and 0.20% or more Adding Non-displayed liquidity:
ADV as a % of US CADV, or --Tapes B and C: $0.0010.
(ii) at least 5% of the NBBO ** in 2,450 or --Tape A: $0.0013.
more symbols on an average daily basis, BBO setting:
calculated monthly and 0.10% or more Adding
ADV as a % of US CADV..
--Tapes B and C: $0.0008.
--Tape A: $0.0011.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding Tier 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At least 5% of the NBBO ** in 1,950 or more Displayed liquidity:
symbols on an average daily basis, calculated --Tapes B and C: $0.0012.
monthly and 0.10% or more Adding ADV as a % of --Tape A: $0.0015.
US CADV.
Non-displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0014.
--Tape A: $0.0017.
BBO Setting:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0012.
--Tape A: $0.0015.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adding Tier 3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At least 5% of the NBBO ** in 550 or more symbols Displayed liquidity:
on an average daily basis, calculated monthly. --Tapes B and C: $0.0015.
--Tape A: $0.0017.
Non-displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0017.
--Tape A: $0.0019.
BBO Setting:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0015.
--Tape A: $0.0017.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 29265]]
Adding Tier 4 *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.015% or more Adding ADV as a % of US CADV...... Displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0023.
--Tape A: $0.0025.
Non-displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0025.
--Tape A: $0.0027.
BBO Setting:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0021.
--Tape A: $0.0023.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step Up Adding Tier 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.07% or more Adding ADV as a % of US CADV over Displayed liquidity:
the ETP Holder's Adding ADV as a % of US CADV in --Tapes B and C: $0.0012.
November 2018. --Tape A: $0.0015.
Non-displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0014.
--Tape A: $0.0017.
BBO Setting:
--Tape B and C: $0.0012.
--Tape A: $0.0015.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Step Up Adding Tier 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.04% or more Adding ADV as a % of US CADV over Displayed liquidity:
the ETP Holder's Adding ADV as a % of US CADV in --Tape B and C: $0.0015.
November 2018. --Tape A: $0.0018.
Non-displayed liquidity:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0017.
--Tape A: $0.0020.
BBO Setting:
--Tapes B and C: $0.0015.
--Tape A: $0.0018.
MPL:
--All Tapes: $0.0005.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change will add clarity to the
Exchange's rules by making the Fee Schedule easier to read. Other than
the changes to the Adding Tier quoting qualifications described above,
the Exchange proposes no other substantive changes to the Adding Tiers.
The proposed changes are not otherwise intended to address any
other issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that ETP
Holders would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that lowering the number of securities in
which ETP Holders are required to quote at least 5% of the time at the
NBBO on an average daily basis, calculated monthly, for Adding Tiers 1-
3 provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues and fees and
is not unfairly discriminatory for the following reasons.
As noted above, the Exchange operates in a highly competitive
market. The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Specifically, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the Commission itself recognized, the market for trading
services in NMS stocks has become ``more fragmented and competitive.''
\16\ Indeed, equity trading is currently dispersed across 13
exchanges,\17\ 32 alternative trading systems,\18\ and numerous broker-
dealer
[[Page 29266]]
internalizers and wholesalers. Based on publicly-available information,
no single exchange has more than 18% of the market share of executed
volume of equity trades (whether including or excluding auction
volume).\19\ Therefore, no exchange possesses significant pricing power
in the execution of equity order flow. More specifically, in May 2019,
the Exchange had 1.3% market share of executed volume of equity trades
(excluding auction volume).\20\ The Exchange believes that the ever-
shifting market share among the exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants can shift order flow, or
discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of products, in
response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces constrain
exchange transaction fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Transaction Fee Pilot, 84 FR at 5253.
\17\ See Cboe Global Markets, U.S. Equities Market Volume
Summary (May 31, 2019), available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/. See generally https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/divisionsmarketregmrexchangesshtml.html.
\18\ See FINRA ATS Transparency Data (May 6, 2019), available at
https://otctransparency.finra.org/otctransparency/AtsIssueData.
Although 54 alternative trading systems were registered with the
Commission as of April 30, 2019, only 32 are currently trading. A
list of alternative trading systems registered with the Commission
is available at https://www.sec.gov/files/data/alternative-trading-system-ats-list/atslist043019.pdf.
\19\ See Cboe Global Markets U.S. Equities Market Volume Summary
(May 31, 2019), available at http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/market_share/.
\20\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it would continue to encourage ETP
Holders to send orders to the Exchange, thereby contributing to robust
levels of liquidity, which benefits all market participants. Further,
the Exchange believes that, for the reasons discussed above, lowering
the quoting requirement would make it easier for liquidity providers to
qualify for the fees, thereby encouraging submission of additional
liquidity to the Exchange. The proposed change will thereby encourage
the submission of additional liquidity to a national securities
exchange, thus promoting price discovery and transparency and enhancing
order execution opportunities for ETP Holders from the substantial
amounts of liquidity present on the Exchange. All ETP Holders would
benefit from the greater amounts of liquidity that will be present on
the Exchange, which would provide greater execution opportunities.
The Exchange notes that there are currently four (4) firms
qualifying for the combined Adding Tiers 1-4 and that, based on current
participation on the Exchange, no additional firms would initially
qualify with the lower requirements. Without having a view of an ETP
Holder's activity on other markets and off-exchange venues, the
Exchange believes the proposed lower quoting requirement would provide
an incentive for market participants to increase their quoting to meet
the new lower requirement and submit additional adding liquidity to the
Exchange. In addition, based on the profile of liquidity-providing
firms generally, the Exchange believes that more than twelve (12) firms
could qualify for these tiers if they choose to direct order flow to,
and increase quoting on, the Exchange.
Moreover, the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because all qualifying ETP Holders that add liquidity to
the Exchange and quote at the NBBO in each tier would be eligible for
the fee by satisfying the lowered quoting thresholds, and because the
lower thresholds would apply equally to all similarly situated ETP
Holders. The Exchange further believes that the proposed changes would
not permit unfair discrimination among ETP Holders because the
different tiered rates are available equally to all ETP Holders. As
described above, in today's competitive marketplace, order flow
providers have a choice of where to direct liquidity-providing order
flow, and while only four ETP Holders have qualified to date for these
rates, the Exchange believes there are additional ETP Holders that
could qualify if they chose to direct their order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed non-substantive
changes to the Adding Tier presentation would not be inconsistent with
the public interest and the protection of investors because investors
will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from increased clarity and
transparency, thereby reducing potential confusion.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\21\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would encourage the submission of additional
liquidity to a public exchange by making it easier for liquidity
providers to qualify for the Adding Tier 1-3 fees, thereby increasing
the likelihood that market participants will send orders to the
Exchange to trade with the liquidity providers' orders and thus
promoting market depth, price discovery and transparency and enhancing
order execution opportunities for ETP Holders. As a result, the
Exchange believes that the proposed change furthers the Commission's
goal in adopting Regulation NMS of fostering competition among orders,
which promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks for all
types of orders, large and small.'' \22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
\22\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808, 70 FR 37495,
37498-99 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to attract
additional order flow to the Exchange by reducing the number of
securities that an ETP Permit holder is required to quote for Adding
Tiers 1-3. Greater liquidity benefits all market participants on the
Exchange by providing more trading opportunities and encourages ETP
Holders to send orders, thereby contributing to robust levels of
liquidity, which benefits all market participants. The proposed reduced
quoting requirement would be available to all similarly-situated market
participants, and, as such, the proposed change would not impose a
disparate burden on competition among market participants on the
Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily choose to
send their orders to other exchange and off-exchange venues if they
deem fee levels at those other venues to be more favorable. The
Exchange notes that Exchange's market share of intraday trading
(excluding auctions) declined from 1.5% for the month of March 2019 to
1.3% for the month of May 2019.\23\ In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges and with off-exchange venues. Because
competitors are free to modify their own fees and credits in response,
and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing
practices, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee change can
impose any burden on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See note 9, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including
those that currently offer similar order types and comparable
transaction pricing, by encouraging additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange for execution.
[[Page 29267]]
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \24\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \25\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \26\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSENAT-2019-14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSENAT-2019-14. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSENAT-2019-14, and should be submitted
on or before July 12, 2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-13115 Filed 6-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P