[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17979-17981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08495]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0178]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Fox River, Green Bay, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to authorize the Main Street Bridge, 
mile 1.58, the Walnut Street Bridge, mile 1.81, and the Tilleman 
Memorial Bridge, mile 2.27, all over the Fox River at Green Bay, WI to 
operate remotely. The request was made by WISDOT to operate all three 
bridges from the Walnut Street Bridge. This proposed rule will test the 
remote operations with tenders onsite, and will not change the 
operating schedule of the bridges.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or 
before October 28, 2019.

ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2019-0178 using Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge Management Specialist, 
Ninth Coast Guard District; telephone 216-902-6085, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
HDCCTV High Definition Closed Circuit Television
IGLD85 International Great Lakes Datum of 1985
IRCCTV Infrared Closed Circuit Television
LWD Low Water Datum based on IGLD 85
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
OMB Office of Management and Budget
PLC Programmable Logic Control
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
WI-FI Wireless Fidelity
WISDOT Wisconsin Department of Transportation

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    Green Bay, Wisconsin, is located in the eastern portion of the 
state at the head or southwest end of Green Bay. The Bay is oriented 
northeast-southwest and is separated from Lake Michigan to the 
southeast by the Door Peninsula. Green Bay Harbor, at the mouth of Fox 
River at the south end of Green Bay, serves the cities of Green Bay, 
WI, and De Pere, WI. The major commodities handled at the port are 
coal, limestone, wood pulp, cement, aggregates and agricultural 
products. The dredged

[[Page 17980]]

entrance channel leads generally southwest through the shallow water in 
the south end of Green Bay for about 11.5 miles to the mouth of Fox 
River and thence upstream for about 7.2 miles to a turning basin at De 
Pere. There are three bascule bridges operated by WISDOT and the City 
of Green Bay: Main Street Bridge, mile 1.58, provides 120 feet 
horizontal and 12 feet vertical clearance in the closed position; the 
Walnut Street Bridge, mile 1.81, provides 124 feet horizontal and 11 
feet vertical clearance in the closed position; and the Tilleman 
Memorial Bridge, mile 2.27, provides 124 feet horizontal and 32 feet 
vertical clearance in the closed position.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this NPRM under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Bridge owners are required to provide necessary drawtenders for the 
safe and prompt opening of a bridge and to respond to visual, sound, or 
radiotelephone communications for openings; unless, authorized by the 
U.S. Coast Guard District Commander to operate remotely.
    This proposed rule will allow WISDOT and the City of Green Bay to 
operate all three bridges from the Walnut Street Bridge while keeping 
tenders at the Main Street and Tillman Memorial Bridge while the public 
observes and comments on the remote operations throughout the summer.
    WISDOT stated that their updated PLC, HDCCT system and updated 
communications systems have improved the safety of bridge operations. 
These systems use a redundant closed band WI-FI network to communicate 
between the bridges. The tenders operating the three bridges will be 
City of Green Bay employees with WISDOT technical assistance. Three 
distinct consoles will be used to control the three bridges from the 
Walnut Street Bridge. WISDOT stated WI-FI security protocols are in 
place to prevent unauthorized bridge operations and there are no 
physical wires connecting the control panels to any of the bridges.
    Additional IFCCTV systems are installed on the bridges to see 
vessels during limited visibility and WISDOT intends to have extra 
drawtenders available during heavy weather and high traffic events. 
WISDOT installed a public address system that allows 2-way voice 
communication between vessels and the remote tender and a remotely 
operated VHF-FM Marine Radiotelephone that monitors Channel 16.
    This proposed rule will require a tender to be physically at the 
bridges to evaluate the remote operations and to intervene if there is 
a failure in the remote abilities. If remote operations are approved 
and there is a discrepancy with the remote equipment the tender from 
Walnut Street can open all three bridges manually within 30-minutes.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control 
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been 
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt 
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that 
vessels can still transit the bridge and the bridge will continue to 
open as required in the current regulation.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of 
vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the 
reasons stated in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have 
a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator because 
the bridge will continue to open on signal.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any 
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions

[[Page 17981]]

that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal 
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 
(adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed 
rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects 
of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland 
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction 
M16475.lD, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and 
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a 
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply 
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. 
Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review, 
under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
    A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration and a 
Memorandum for the Record are not required for this proposed rule. We 
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a 
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the 
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a 
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland 
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Amend Sec.  117.1087 by adding paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
    (a) * * *
    (4) The Main Street Bridge, mile 1.58, the Walnut Street Bridge, 
mile 1.81, and the Tilleman Memorial Bridge, mile 2.27, are operated 
remotely.
* * * * *

    Dated: April 23, 2019.
N.A. Bartolotta,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District, 
Acting.
[FR Doc. 2019-08495 Filed 4-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P