[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14909-14910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07252]



[[Page 14909]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 17

[Docket Nos. FWS-R8-ES-2018-0106 and FWS-R8-ES-2018-0107; 4500030113]
RINs 1018-BD87 and 1018-BD88


Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Status 
for the Bi-State Distinct Population Segment of Greater Sage-Grouse and 
Designation of Critical Habitat

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment periods.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), are 
reopening the comment period on our October 28, 2013, proposed rules to 
list the Bi-State distinct population segment (DPS) of greater sage-
grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened under the Endangered 
Species Act (Act) and to designate critical habitat for that DPS. We 
are reopening the proposed rules' comment periods for 60 days to give 
all interested parties an additional opportunity to comment on the 
proposed rules. Comments previously submitted need not be resubmitted 
as they are already incorporated into the public record and will be 
fully considered in the final rules. We will publish a final listing 
determination for the DPS in the Federal Register on or before October 
1, 2019.

DATES: The comment periods on the proposed rules that published October 
28, 2013 (78 FR 64358 and 78 FR 64328), are reopened. We will accept 
comments received or postmarked on or before June 11, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comment submission: You may submit comments by one of the 
following methods:
    (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter either FWS-R8-ES-2018-
0106, which is the docket number for the proposed listing determination 
and section 4(d) rule, or FWS-R8-ES-2018-0107, which is the docket 
number for the proposed critical habitat designation. Then click on the 
Search button. On the resulting page, in the Search panel on the left 
side of the screen, under the Document Type heading, click on the 
Proposed Rules link to locate this document. You may submit a comment 
by clicking on ``Comment Now!''
    (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail or hand-deliver to: Public 
Comments Processing, Attn: [enter appropriate docket number: Docket No. 
FWS-R8-ES-2018-0106 for the proposed listing determination and section 
4(d) rule, or Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2018-0107 for the proposed critical 
habitat designation], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: BPHC; 5275 
Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
    We request that you send comments only by the methods described 
above. We will post all comments on http://www.regulations.gov. This 
generally means that we will post any personal information you provide 
us (see Information Requested, below, for more information).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Swed, Field Supervisor, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service, Reno Fish and Wildlife Office, 1340 
Financial Boulevard, Suite 234, Reno, NV 89502; telephone 775-861-6300. 
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call 
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Please refer to the October 28, 2013, proposed listing rule (78 FR 
64358) and the 2015 Species Report (Service 2015) for information about 
taxonomy, habitat (sagebrush ecosystem), seasonal habitat selection, 
life-history characteristics, home range, life expectancy and survival 
rates, historical and current range distribution, population estimates 
and lek (sage-grouse breeding complex) counts, population trends, and 
land ownership information of the Bi-State DPS of greater sage-grouse. 
Please also refer to our March 23, 2010, notice of 12-month petition 
findings (75 FR 13910) for the greater sage-grouse for a detailed 
evaluation of the Bi-State DPS under our DPS policy. For a detailed 
summary of previous public comment periods for the proposed listing 
with a section 4(d) rule and the proposed critical habitat designation 
for the Bi-State DPS of greater sage-grouse, please see the Previous 
Federal Actions section of our 2015 withdrawal of those proposed rules 
(80 FR 22828; April 23, 2015).
    On October 28, 2013, we published in the Federal Register (78 FR 
64358) a proposed rule to list the Bi-State DPS of greater sage-grouse 
in California and Nevada as a threatened species under the Act (16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), with a rule issued under section 4(d) of the Act. 
On the same day, we published in the Federal Register (78 FR 64328) a 
proposed rule to designate critical habitat for the Bi-State DPS of 
greater sage-grouse. On April 23, 2015, we published in the Federal 
Register (80 FR 22828) a withdrawal of the proposed rules to list the 
Bi-State DPS as a threatened species with a section 4(d) rule and to 
designate critical habitat for the DPS. This decision was based on our 
conclusion that the threats to the DPS as identified in the proposed 
listing rule were no longer as significant as believed at the time of 
publication of the proposed listing rule, and that conservation plans 
were ameliorating threats to the DPS. Thus, we concluded that the Bi-
State DPS did not meet the definition of an endangered or a threatened 
species throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
    On March 9, 2016, Desert Survivors, the Center for Biological 
Diversity, WildEarth Guardians, and Western Watershed Project filed 
suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 
California. The suit challenged the withdrawal of the proposal to list 
the Bi-State DPS. On May 5, 2018, the court issued a decision. As the 
result of the court order, the April 23, 2015, withdrawal was vacated 
and remanded to the Service for further consideration consistent with 
the order.
    The court's action returns the process to the proposed rule stage, 
and the status of the Bi-State DPS has effectively reverted to that of 
a proposed species for the purposes of consultation under section 7 of 
the Act; it also reinstates the proposed 4(d) rule, as well as the 
proposed critical habitat designation for the Bi-State DPS (78 FR 
64328; October 28, 2013). Therefore, this document notifies the public 
that we are reopening the comment periods on the October 28, 2013, 
proposed rules to list the Bi-State DPS as threatened with a section 
4(d) rule (78 FR 64358), and the proposed critical habitat designation 
for the DPS (78 FR 65328). We also announce that we are initiating a 
new status review of the Bi-State DPS, to determine whether it meets 
the definition of an endangered or threatened species under the Act. 
Any listing determination we make must be made based on the best 
available information.

Information Requested

    We will accept written comments and information during this 
reopened comment period on our October 28, 2013, proposed rules to list 
the Bi-State DPS as threatened with a section 4(d) rule (78 FR 64358), 
and the proposed critical habitat designation for the DPS (78 FR 
65328). We also request new information regarding the Bi-State DPS that 
has become available since the

[[Page 14910]]

publication of the proposed rules to inform the status review.
    We will consider information and recommendations from all 
interested parties. We are particularly interested in comments 
concerning:
    (1) The Bi-State DPS's biology, distribution, population size and 
trend, including:
    (a) Habitat requirements for feeding, breeding, and sheltering;
    (b) Genetics and taxonomy;
    (c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns; 
and
    (d) Historical and current population levels, and current and 
projected trends.
    (2) The factors that are the basis for making a listing 
determination for a species under section 4(a) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 
1533(a)(1)), which are:
    (a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or 
curtailment of its habitat or range;
    (b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or 
educational purposes;
    (c) Disease or predation;
    (d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
    (e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued 
existence.
    (3) Biological, commercial trade, or other relevant data concerning 
any threats (or lack thereof) to this Bi-State DPS and existing 
regulations that may be addressing those threats.
    (4) Information on current habitat conditions, including, but not 
limited to, quality of upland and meadow or riparian sites, presence 
and abundance of annual invasive grasses and weeds or other increasing 
plants (e.g., conifer trees), and recovery of previously burned sites. 
This information may include larger landscape-scale assessments or 
smaller site-specific investigations.
    (5) Application of the Bi-State Action Plan of March 15, 2012, to 
our determination of status under section 4(a)(1) of the Act, 
particularly comments or information to help us assess the certainty 
that the plan will be effective in conserving the Bi-State DPS of 
greater sage-grouse and will be implemented.
    (6) Information concerning whether it would be appropriate to 
include in the 4(d) rule a provision for take of the Bi-State DPS of 
greater sage-grouse in accordance with applicable State law for 
educational or scientific purposes, the enhancement of propagation or 
survival of the DPS, zoological exhibition, and other conservation 
purposes consistent with the Act.
    (7) Whether the Service should include in the scope of the proposed 
4(d) rule the incidental take of sage-grouse within the Bi-State DPS if 
the take results from other agricultural activities not subject to the 
Sage Grouse Initiative or the Bi-state Action Plan, if those activities 
are compatible with the conservation of the Bi-State DPS.
    (8) Past and ongoing conservation measures for the Bi-State DPS, 
its habitat, or both.
    (9) Any new or updated information relative to our 2013 proposed 
designation of critical habitat for the Bi-State DPS.
    If you submitted comments or information on the October 28, 2013, 
proposed rule to list the Bi-State DPS as threatened with a section 
4(d) rule (78 FR 64358), or on the October 28, 2013, proposed rule to 
designate critical habitat for the DPS (78 FR 65328), during the 
initial comment period or on any of the subsequent comment periods in 
2013 and 2014, please do not resubmit them. Any such comments are 
incorporated as part of the public record of the rulemaking proceeding, 
and we will fully consider them in the preparation of our final 
determinations.
    Our final determinations will take into consideration all written 
comments and any additional information we receive during all comment 
periods. The final decisions may differ from the proposed rules, based 
on our review of all information we receive during the rulemaking 
proceeding. If we receive significant new scientific information, we 
may need to reopen the public comment period so that the public can 
comment on the new information.
    You may submit your comments and materials concerning the proposed 
rules by one of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. We request that you 
send comments only by the methods described in ADDRESSES. If you submit 
a comment via http://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment--
including any personal identifying information--will be posted on the 
website. We will post all hardcopy comments on http://www.regulations.gov as well. If you submit a hardcopy comment that 
includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top 
of your document that we withhold this information from public review. 
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
    Comments and materials we receive will be available for public 
inspection on http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-
2018-0106 for the proposed listing determination and section 4(d) rule, 
and Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2018-0107 for the proposed critical habitat 
designation. Supporting documentation we used in preparing the proposed 
rules is available for public inspection on http://www.regulations.gov 
under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2013-0072 for the proposed listing 
determination and section 4(d) rule, or Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2013-0042 
for the proposed critical habitat designation, or by appointment, 
during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Reno Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 
You may obtain copies of the proposed rules on http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2013-0072 for the 
proposed listing determination and section 4(d) rule, or Docket No. 
FWS-R8-ES-2013-0042 for the proposed critical habitat designation, or 
by mail from the Reno Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT). Please note that the 2013 dockets contain 
documents and other information related to the proposed rules, as well 
as the comments received and the proposed rules themselves, while the 
2018 dockets are the correct dockets for submission of comments during 
this public comment period (see DATES, above).

Authors

    The primary author of this document is the Service's Reno Fish and 
Wildlife Office in Reno, Nevada, in coordination with the Service's 
Pacific Southwest Regional Office in Sacramento, California.

Authority

    The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
seq.), is the authority for this action.

    Dated: March 17, 2019.
Margaret E. Everson,
Principal Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Exercising 
the Authority of the Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-07252 Filed 4-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P