[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 66 (Friday, April 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13516-13520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06662]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
9 CFR Part 381
[Docket No. FSIS-2017-0026]
RIN 0583-AD58
Eligibility of Honduras To Export Poultry Products to the United
States
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is amending the
Federal poultry products inspection regulations to add Honduras to the
list of countries eligible to export poultry products to the United
States. The FSIS review of Honduras' laws, regulations, and inspection
system demonstrated that its poultry slaughter inspection system is
equivalent to the system FSIS has established under the Poultry
Products Inspection Act (PPIA) and its implementing regulations.
DATES: Effective May 6, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Wagner, Assistant
Administrator, Office of Policy and Program Development; Telephone:
(202) 720-0089.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under this final rule, Honduras will be
permitted to export to the United States only raw poultry products,
such as whole carcasses produced in certified Honduran establishments,
because FSIS only assessed Honduras' poultry slaughter inspection
system. Honduras would need to request an equivalence determination and
submit additional information records for FSIS to review before FSIS
would allow Honduras to export heat-treated poultry products, such as
cooked or canned product, to the United States. All products that
Honduras exports to the United States will be subject to re-inspection
at ports of entry by FSIS inspectors. At this time, Honduras is unable
to ship raw poultry product to the United States because it is not
recognized by APHIS as being free of Newcastle Disease (ND).
Background
On April 13, 2016, FSIS published a proposed rule in the Federal
Register (81 FR 21758) to add Honduras to the list of countries
eligible to export poultry products to the United States (9 CFR
381.196(b)). This final rule is consistent with the proposed rule.
As explained in the proposed rule, section 17 of the PPIA (21
U.S.C. 466) prohibits importation into the United States of slaughtered
poultry, or parts or products thereof, of any kind unless they are
healthful, wholesome, fit for human food, not adulterated, and contain
no dye, chemical, preservative, or ingredient that renders them
unhealthful, unwholesome, adulterated, or unfit for human food. Under
the PPIA and the regulations that implement it, poultry products
imported into the United States must be produced under standards for
safety, wholesomeness, and labeling accuracy that are equivalent to
those of the United States. Under the regulations at 9 CFR 381.196,
FSIS sets out the procedures by which foreign countries may become
eligible to export poultry and poultry products to the United States.
Section 381.196(a) requires a foreign country's poultry inspection
system to include standards equivalent to those of the United States
and to provide legal authority for the inspection system and its
implementing regulations that is equivalent to that of the United
States. Specifically, a country's legal authority and regulations must
impose requirements equivalent to those of the United States with
respect to: (1) Ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection by, or under the
direct supervision of, a veterinarian, or other employees or licensees
of the system under the direct supervision of veterinarians; (2)
official controls by the national government over establishment
construction, facilities, and equipment; (3) direct and continuous
official supervision of slaughtering of poultry and processing of
poultry products by inspectors to ensure that product is not
adulterated or misbranded; (4) complete separation of establishments
certified to export from those not certified; (5) maintenance of a
single standard of inspection and sanitation throughout certified
establishments; (6) requirements for sanitation and for sanitary
handling of product at establishments certified to export; (7) official
controls over condemned product; (8) a Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point (HACCP) system; and (9) any other requirements found in
the PPIA and its implementing regulations (9 CFR 381.196(a)(2)(ii)).
The country's inspection system must also impose requirements
equivalent to those of the United States with respect to: (1)
Organizational structure and staffing, so as to ensure uniform
enforcement of the requisite laws and regulations in all certified
establishments; (2) ultimate control and supervision by the national
government over the official activities of employees or licensees; (3)
qualified inspectors; (4) enforcement and certification authority; (5)
administrative and technical support; (6) inspection, sanitation,
quality, species verification, and residue standards; and (7) any other
inspection requirements (9 CFR 381.196(a)(2)(i)).
Evaluation of the Honduran Poultry Inspection System
In 2003, the government of Honduras requested approval to export
poultry products to the United States. Honduras stated that if
approved, its immediate intent was to export raw poultry carcasses to
the United States. FSIS then began to evaluate the Honduras poultry
slaughter inspection system to determine whether it is equivalent to
that of the United States.
FSIS conducted a document review to evaluate the laws, regulations,
and other documentation used by Honduras to execute its poultry
inspection system. FSIS examined the information submitted by Honduras
to verify that the following equivalence components were addressed
satisfactorily with respect to standards, activities, resources, and
enforcement: (1) Government Oversight; (2) Statutory Authority and Food
Safety Regulations; (3) Sanitation; (4) Hazard Analysis and Critical
Control Point Systems; (5) Chemical Residue Testing Programs; and (6)
Microbiological Testing Programs. The document review was satisfactory
to FSIS, and FSIS scheduled an on-site review to evaluate all aspects
of the Honduran poultry inspection program.
In November 2005, FSIS conducted an on-site audit of the Honduran
poultry inspection program and identified systemic deficiencies within
three equivalence components: Government Oversight, Sanitation, and
HACCP. In response to this audit, Honduras submitted a corrective
action plan that addressed FSIS's findings.
In June 2009, FSIS conducted a second on-site audit to verify
whether
[[Page 13517]]
all outstanding issues identified during the previous audit had been
resolved. Through the 2009 audit, FSIS verified that Honduras
implemented corrective actions in response to the previous audit
findings, and these corrective actions were working as intended.
However, during the 2009 audit, FSIS identified systemic deficiencies
not identified in the previous audit. The deficiencies related to the
equivalence components of Sanitation, HACCP, and Microbiological
Testing Programs.
Following the 2009 on-site audit, Honduras again provided a
comprehensive corrective action plan that addressed the findings
identified. Corrective actions included implementing new regulations,
procedures, measures, and verification activities to ensure uniformity
in conducting official inspection activities.
In September 2014, FSIS conducted a third on-site audit to verify
that Honduras had satisfactorily addressed all the findings of the
November 2005 and June 2009 audits and had met the FSIS criteria for
all six equivalence components. The evaluation of all documentation
provided by Honduras since the 2009 audit (corrective actions taken in
response to the 2009 audit findings, regulatory updates, new
performance standards, and new microbiological laboratory procedures
and analyses) supported the decision to perform the third audit. The
auditor verified that all corrective actions in response to the 2009
audit findings were implemented as described and working as intended.
There were no new audit findings from the 2014 on-site audit. The
auditor concluded that the Honduran poultry regulatory system
cumulatively achieves a level of protection equivalent to that provided
by the United States poultry inspection system.
Consequently, on April 13, 2016, FSIS published a proposed rule to
add Honduras to the list of countries eligible to export raw poultry
products, such as whole carcasses, to the United States, based on its
finding that the Honduran poultry slaughter inspection system is
equivalent to the United States poultry inspection system. For more
detailed information on the FSIS evaluation of the Honduran poultry
inspection system, see the proposed rule (81 FR 21758), and for the
full audit reports, go to http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/international-affairs/importing-products/eligible-countries-products-foreign-establishments/foreign-audit-reports/foreign-audit-reports.
Final Rule
After considering the comments received on the proposed rule,
discussed below, FSIS has concluded that the Honduran poultry
inspection system is equivalent to the United States inspection system
for raw poultry products. Therefore, FSIS is amending its poultry
products inspection regulations to add Honduras to the list of
countries eligible to export poultry products to the United States (in
9 CFR 381.196 (b)). Under the FSIS import regulations, the government
of Honduras must certify to FSIS that establishments requesting to
export poultry products to the United States are operating under
requirements equivalent to those of the United States (9 CFR
381.196(a)).
Although a foreign country may be listed in FSIS regulations as
eligible to export poultry to the United States, the exporting
country's products must also comply with all other applicable
requirements of the United States. These requirements include
restrictions under 9 CFR part 94 of the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) regulations, which also regulate the
importation of poultry products from foreign countries into the United
States. At this time, Honduras cannot ship poultry products to the
United States because APHIS does not recognize Honduras as a region
free from ND.
Under this final rule, all slaughtered poultry, or parts and
products thereof, exported to the United States from Honduras will be
subject to re-inspection at the United States ports of entry for, but
not limited to, transportation damage, product and container defects,
labeling, proper certification, general condition, and accurate count.
FSIS will conduct other types of re-inspection activities, such as
taking product samples for laboratory analysis to detect any drug or
chemical residues that may render the product unsafe, as well as any
species or product composition violations that would render the product
economically adulterated. Products that pass re-inspection will be
stamped with the official mark of inspection and allowed to enter
United States commerce. If they do not meet U.S. requirements, they
will be refused entry and within 45 days will have to be returned to
the country of origin, destroyed, or converted to animal food (subject
to approval by FDA), depending on the violation. The import re-
inspection activities can be found on the FSIS website at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/international-affairs/importing-products/port-of-entry-procedures.
In addition, should Honduras meet APHIS requirements, Honduran
poultry products will be eligible for importation into the United
States only if they are from animals slaughtered on or after the
effective date of this final rule.
Summary of Comments and Responses
FSIS received nine comments on the proposed rule. Seven of the
comments were from individuals; one comment was from a consumer
advocacy group; and another comment was from a not-for-profit
corporation that promotes poultry industry trade associations in
Central America. Of the nine comments, five were against the proposed
rule, including the consumer advocacy group. Three individuals and the
one trade advocate were in support of the proposed rule.
The following is a discussion of the relevant issues raised in the
comments.
Comments: Several commenters objected to the rule for economic
reasons. Commenters stated that poultry imports could undermine U.S.
poultry production leading to decreased demand for domestic supply and
unemployment for U.S. poultry producers. The commenters were concerned
that the increased competition in the poultry market will negatively
impact domestic producers by putting downward pressure on the market
price and potentially edging domestic producers out of the market.
An individual commenter questioned whether there is a need for
imported poultry and whether the rule is necessary because of a lack of
domestic supply. Another commenter expressed concern about using U.S.
tax dollars to help Honduras reach equivalency in its inspection
systems, so the country could be approved by FSIS for exports.
Response: Economic and market realities make it unlikely that the
increased amounts of poultry imports from Honduras will lead to
unemployment for domestic producers. Should Honduras meet APHIS
requirements, FSIS estimates Honduran exports will comprise 0.05
percent of the U.S. market annually the first three years. FSIS does
not believe that this rule will adversely affect the U.S. poultry
industry because the volume of trade that results from this rule will
likely be small and have little effect on supply and prices. Demand for
domestically produced poultry will not be affected because FSIS expects
the market price to remain stable.
FSIS has conducted a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of the
rule and determined it to be advantageous to
[[Page 13518]]
both countries. The preliminary and final analyses recognize that any
significant effects of the rule will come through efficiency gains.
Additionally, FSIS has an appropriated annual budget to review
documents and audit countries' inspection systems to assess whether
they are equivalent to the FSIS inspection system. Other than
explaining FSIS requirements, FSIS does not aid countries in becoming
equivalent. These activities will not lead to direct competition
because there is no expected market price increase resulting from the
rule.
Comment: One commenter expressed concern about ND in Honduras. This
commenter stated that FSIS should test individual poultry products.
Response: Although Honduras may be listed in FSIS's regulations as
eligible to export poultry products to the United States, the products
must also comply with all other applicable requirements of the United
States, including those of APHIS, before any products can enter the
United States.
APHIS is responsible for preventing the entry of foreign animal
diseases into the livestock population of the United States. APHIS
determines the animal health status of foreign countries or regions for
certain diseases, and this process is outlined in Title 9 CFR part 92.
These animal health status determinations help establish the import
requirements for livestock and products derived from them.
As is discussed above, at this time, APHIS does not allow Honduras
to export raw poultry to the U.S. because Honduras is not recognized by
APHIS as a region free of ND. Honduras has requested that APHIS
recognize it as free of ND, and APHIS is conducting a review and
evaluation. If APHIS determines that Honduras is free of ND, it will
make its evaluation available for public comment through a document
published in the Federal Register.
FSIS and APHIS work closely together to ensure that all poultry
products imported into the United States comply with the regulatory
requirements of both agencies. In 1985, FSIS and APHIS signed a
memorandum of understanding (MOU) in which both agencies agreed to
cooperate in meeting their respective needs for information on disease
surveillance, diagnostic testing, investigations, trace backs, and
animal and public health emergencies. Information exchange between the
two agencies is necessary to reduce the spread of animal disease, while
providing a wholesome food supply.
The MOU is updated periodically to ensure that it addresses matters
of importance to both agencies. The MOU was last updated November 20,
2014. In accord with this MOU, FSIS and APHIS established procedures
for communication between the two agencies regarding the inspection,
handling, and disposition of imported poultry products. APHIS and FSIS
communicate regularly to ensure that products APHIS has restricted from
entering the United States because of animal disease concerns are not
imported into the United States.
Comment: One commenter expressed concerns about the length of time
it took Honduras to achieve equivalence and how Honduras plans to
maintain equivalence in the future. The commenter stated that the FSIS
2014 audit report does not contain information about the number of
inspectors assigned to poultry slaughter lines, the workload ratio of
the assigned inspectors, or the line speeds in Honduras. The commenter
also stated concerns about the reliability of establishments'--
interventions and the CCA's sampling protocols.
Response: Honduras meets current standards with regard to line
speeds and the workload ratio of assigned inspectors. During the 2014
audit, FSIS observed online inspection of 140 birds per minute with 4
online inspectors, or 35 birds per minute per inspector. The Honduran
food safety system, food safety interventions and sampling protocols
were assessed during the FSIS on-site audits.
FSIS assesses a country's food regulatory system in terms of six
equivalence components and uses its findings from the assessment in
deciding whether to grant eligibility to the country for the
importation of its poultry products into the United States. Based on
the 2014 follow-up on-site audit, FSIS determined that Honduras fully
met the criteria within those six equivalence components, in accordance
with 9 CFR 327.2. FSIS tentatively concluded that, as implemented, the
Honduran poultry slaughter inspection system is equivalent to the
United States poultry inspection system. The details of Honduran
compliance with those components can all be found on the FSIS website
at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/international-affairs/importing-products/eligible-countries-products-foreign-establishments/foreign-audit-reports/foreign-audit-reports.
FSIS ensures that countries maintain equivalence through a three-
part process, involving: (1) Recurring equivalence reviews (e.g.,
through use of the country Self Reporting Tool or other documentation
from the Central Competent Authority) of the exporting country's
applicable laws and regulations; (2) periodic on-site equivalence
verification audits in the exporting country; and (3) ongoing point-of-
entry (POE) re-inspection of shipments received from the exporting
country. These POE activities include examination of products for
defects, condition-of container examinations, and laboratory analysis
of product samples.
For all these reasons, therefore, concerns about the length of time
it took Honduras to achieve equivalence and how Honduras plans to
maintain equivalence in the future are unwarranted. Honduras has
sampled and tested for Salmonella in raw poultry since the 2005 and
2009 audits, and has started sampling and testing for Campylobacter in
raw poultry since--the 2014 audit. Honduras has implemented
requirements that are equivalent to FSIS's Poultry Slaughter Rule (79
FR 49565) to ensure pathogen reduction during the slaughter of poultry.
The deficiencies have been remedied, and the Honduran inspection system
will be subject to ongoing verification to ensure that it continues to
maintain standards equivalent to those of the United States.
Comments: The commenters who supported the proposed rule generally
cited the economic benefits of increased trade.
Response: FSIS agrees the rule is mutually beneficial to both the
U.S. and Honduran economies.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563, and the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This final rule has been designated a ``non-significant'' regulatory
action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under E.O. 12866.
Expected Costs of the Final Rule
This final rule adds Honduras to the list of countries eligible to
export raw poultry to the United States. However, because of animal
disease restrictions,
[[Page 13519]]
APHIS regulations currently prohibit Honduras from immediately shipping
raw poultry products to the United States. Honduran establishments are
currently eligible to export raw and processed beef and veal, raw and
processed lamb and mutton, raw and processed goat as well as processed
pork. According to data from the government of Honduras, Honduras
intends to certify one establishment as eligible to export raw poultry
to the United States.\1\ Should the country meet APHIS requirements,
the expected export volume for this establishment for the first three
years is 10,211 Metric Tons (MT). This is expected to increase to
11,231 MT in year four and 12,355 MT in year five.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Honduras currently has only two establishments certified for
meat exports to the United States. Therefore, it is unlikely we will
see a significant increase in the number of establishments eligible
to export poultry from Honduras.
\2\ Source: Correspondence with the Government of Honduras.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. poultry industry is one of the most competitive
agricultural industries in the world. U.S. establishments slaughtered
18.6 million MT of young chickens in 2017.\3\ Approximately 3.0 million
MT of young chickens slaughtered in the United States were exported in
2017 and 0.056 million MT were imported.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf.
\4\ USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Market and Trade Data/PSD
online/Reports and Data: Exports Market year 2017. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/app/index.html#/app/downloads http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The importation of poultry products from Honduras is expected to
have a minimal impact on the United States poultry market. Should
Honduras meet APHIS requirements, FSIS estimates Honduran exports would
comprise 0.05 percent (10,211 MT from Honduras compared to a Unites
States slaughter volume of 18.6 million MT in 2017) of the United
States market annually the first three years. FSIS estimates Honduran
exports would continue to comprise 0.06 percent of the U.S. market the
fourth year and increase to 0.07 percent the fifth year. FSIS projects
that Honduras would not alter the U.S. poultry supply and would not
have an impact on domestic poultry prices. Therefore, FSIS projects
that establishments in the United States would not see the negative
effects that could come from a decrease in price as a result of
increased competition.
Companies based in Honduras that export to the United States or
United States companies that export products from Honduras to the
United States would incur standard costs such as export fees and
freight and insurance costs. However, those companies would be willing
to bear these costs because of the expected benefits associated with
selling their products to the U.S.
Expected Benefits of the Final Rule
Should Honduras meet APHIS requirements, FSIS expects to see an
increase in trade between Honduras and the United States. The volume of
poultry exported from Honduras is likely to be small and is expected to
have little to no effect on domestic poultry supplies or prices.
Therefore, consumers will not benefit from a decrease in price that
would result from increased competition. However, Latin American
preferences for dark meat compliment American preferences for white
meat. Therefore, Honduran establishments will benefit if they export
surplus white meat to the United States. While the export of white meat
from Honduras may be minimal compared to overall consumption in the
United States, these exports may be significant enough in the long run
to influence domestic prices in Honduras.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Haley, Mildred M. (May 2001). Changing Consumer Demand for
Meat: The U.S. Example, 1970-2000. In A. Regmi, Changing Structure
of Global Food Consumption and Trade (pp.41-48). (Economic Research
Service Outlook No. WRS-01-1) Washington, DC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), implemented in 2006, sought to level
the playing field and increase trade between the United States and the
six CAFTA-DR trading partners, including Honduras.\6\ FSIS expects this
final rule will increase trade, benefiting firms and consumers in the
United States and Honduras, especially within the agricultural sector.
Providing market access to Honduran establishments ensures similar
access will be given to United States firms. American firms have
already benefited from CAFTA-DR, with agricultural exports (including
wheat, live animals and red meat) to Honduras nearly doubling (82.5
percent) between 2006 and 2017 and is expected to rise even further in
the future.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ United States Department of Agriculture. FACT SHEET on
Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade
Agreement (Release No. 0237.08). Retrieved on March 18, 2015 from
http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdamediafb?contentid=2008/09/0237.xml&printable=true&contentidonly=true.
\7\ Source: FAS Global Agricultural Trade System--FAS
Agricultural Total Exports to Honduras.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act Assessment
The FSIS Administrator certifies that, for the purposes of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-602), this final rule will not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities in
the United States. As mentioned above, the expected trade volume is
very small. Therefore, the action should not have a significant impact
on small entities that produce poultry products domestically.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No new paperwork requirements are associated with this final rule.
Foreign countries wanting to export poultry and poultry products to the
United States are required to provide information to FSIS certifying
that their inspection system provides standards equivalent to those of
the United States, and that the legal authority for the system and
their implementing regulations are equivalent to those of the United
States.
E-Government Act
FSIS and USDA are committed to achieving the purposes of the E-
Government Act (44 U.S.C. 3601, et seq.) by, among other things,
promoting the use of the internet and other information technologies
and providing increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Additional Public Notification
Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy
development is important. Consequently, FSIS will announce this Federal
Register publication and officially notify the World Trade
Organization's Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (WTO/
SPS Committee) in Geneva, Switzerland, of this proposal on-line through
the FSIS web page located at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register.
FSIS also will make copies of this publication available through
the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information
regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register
notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that
could affect or would be of interest to our constituents and
stakeholders. The Constituent Update is available on the FSIS web page.
Through the web page, FSIS is able to provide information to a much
broader, more diverse audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email
subscription service which provides automatic and customized access to
selected food safety news and information. This service is available
at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. Options range from recalls to
export information, regulations, directives, and notices.
[[Page 13520]]
Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves, and have the
option to password protect their accounts.
USDA Non-Discrimination Statement
No agency, officer, or employee of the USDA shall, on the grounds
of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual
orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status,
income derived from a public assistance program, or political beliefs,
exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to
discrimination any person in the United States under any program or
activity conducted by the USDA.
How To File a Complaint of Discrimination
To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at http://www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you or your
authorized representative.
Send your completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax,
or email:
Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410.
Fax: (202) 690-7442.
Email: [email protected].
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for
communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), should contact
USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
List of Subjects in 9 CFR Part 381
Imported products.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, FSIS is amending 9 CFR
part 381 as follows:
PART 381--POULTRY PRODUCTS INSPECTION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 381 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 138f, 450; 21 U.S.C. 451-470; 7 CFR 2.7,
2.18, 2.53.
Sec. 381.196 [Amended]
0
2. Section 381.196 is amended in paragraph (b) by adding ``Honduras''
in alphabetical order to the list of countries.
Done in Washington, DC.
Carmen M. Rottenberg,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-06662 Filed 4-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-DM-P