[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 32 (Friday, February 15, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4364-4366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02527]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 206, 215, 234, and 235

[Docket DARS-2018-0053]
RIN 0750-AJ83


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Amendments 
Related to General Solicitations (DFARS Case 2018-D021)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement sections of the 
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, which expand 
the definition of ``competitive procedures'' in 10 U.S.C. 2302 and 
extend the term and increase the dollar value under the contract 
authority for advanced development of initial or additional prototype 
units.

DATES: Effective February 15, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Kitchens, telephone 571-
372-6104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 83 FR 
54698 on October 31, 2018, to implement sections 221 and 861 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 
(Pub. L. 115-91).
    Section 221 amends 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) to allow for an expanded 
application of other competitive procedures by replacing the words 
``basic research'' with ``science and technology''. ``Competitive 
procedures'' were defined in 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) to include ``the 
competitive selection for award of basic research proposals resulting 
from a general solicitation, and the peer review or scientific review 
(as appropriate) of such proposals.'' Changing the words ``basic 
research'' to ``science and technology'' expands the meaning of other 
competitive procedures to apply to ``advanced technology development'' 
and ``advanced component development and prototypes'' research 
proposals, in addition to ``basic research'' and ``applied research'' 
proposals. One of the solicitation methods for research and development 
proposals, a broad agency announcement (BAA), is defined in the Federal 
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) as ``a general announcement of an agency's 
research interest including criteria for selecting proposals and 
soliciting the participation of all offerors capable of satisfying the 
Government's needs.'' Section 221 permits the use of BAAs for 
competitive selection of science and technology proposals by 
authorizing the use of the competitive procedures at 10 U.S.C. 
2302(2)(B) that result from a general solicitation and peer or 
scientific review of such proposals--a key element of the BAA process.
    Section 861 amends 10 U.S.C. 2302e to allow for an extended term 
limit and increased dollar threshold under the contract authority for 
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units awarded 
from a competitive selection, as specified in 10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B). The 
statutory term limit extends from 12 months to 2 years and the dollar 
threshold increases from $20 million to $100 million in fiscal year 
2017 constant dollars (10 U.S.C. 2302e). Section 861 also amends 10 
U.S.C. 2302e to repeal the obsolete authority implemented by section 
819 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111-84), thereby eliminating the 
expiration date of the authority.
    One respondent submitted a public comment on the proposed rule.

II. Discussion and Analysis

    DoD reviewed the public comment in the development of the final 
rule. A discussion of the comment received and any changes made to the 
rule is provided as follows:

A. Summary of Significant Changes

    DoD did not make any changes to the proposed rule as a result of 
the public comment.

B. Analysis of Public Comment

    Comment: The respondent recommended the proposed rule update 
213.106-1(b) to address documentation requirements related to 
competition for actions not exceeding the simplified acquisition 
threshold (SAT).
    Response: Since there is no DFARS 213.106-1(b) section, DoD 
reviewed FAR 13.106-1(b), Soliciting Competition, which allows 
contracting officers to solicit from a single source, for purchases not 
exceeding the SAT, if the contracting officer determines that 
circumstances deem only one source reasonably available. This rule 
relates to soliciting proposals using other competitive procedures 
(such as a broad agency announcement) and is not related to 
solicitations of a single source for purchases not exceeding the SAT;

[[Page 4365]]

therefore, DoD determined that the public comment is outside the scope 
of this rule.

C. Other Changes

    One minor editorial change is made to the final rule. DoD compared 
the proposed rule to the current version of the DFARS text and noted 
the need to correct a typo at DFARS 215.371-4(a) by changing the word 
``sections'' to ``section''.

III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition 
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available 
Off-the-Shelf Items

    This rule does not add any new provisions or clauses or impact any 
existing provisions or clauses.

IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Order (E.O.s) 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review; and 
E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, direct agencies 
to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives 
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that 
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, 
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). 
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting 
flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, 
therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, 
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This is not a 
major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.

V. Executive Order 13771

    This final rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action, because 
this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.

VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is 
summarized as follows:
    This rule proposes to amend the DFARS to implement sections 221 and 
861 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 
(FY) 2018.
    Section 221 expands the definition of ``competitive procedures'' at 
10 U.S.C. 2302(2)(B) by removing the term ``basic research'' and adding 
``science and technology'' in its place. Section 861 implements a 
statutory modification to 10 U.S.C. 2302e to extend the term limit and 
dollar threshold for the contract authority for advanced development of 
initial or additional prototype units from 12 months to 2 years and 
from $20 million to $100 million in fiscal year 2017 constant dollars 
(10 U.S.C. 2302e), respectively. The modification also repeals the 
obsolete authority of section 819 of the NDAA for FY 2010 (Pub. L. 111-
84), thereby eliminating the expiration date of September 30, 2019, for 
the contract authority for advanced development of initial or 
additional prototype units.
    The objective of this rule is to implement sections 221 and 861 to 
establish broad agency announcements as a competitive procedure that 
may be used to select science and technology proposals and to expand 
the term limit and dollar threshold for the contract authority for 
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units. This 
rule impacts internal Government procedures by expanding the meaning of 
other competitive procedures to include the competitive selection of 
science and technology proposals and expands the contract authority for 
advanced development of initial or additional prototype units.
    There were no public comments concerning the initial regulatory 
flexibility analysis.
    In FY 2017, DoD awarded 1,853 contracts for research and 
development, excluding Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and 
Small Technology Transfer Research (STTR) program requirements. 
Approximately 53% of those new contract actions were awarded to 1,005 
of unique small business and nontraditional DoD entities. There were 
2,858 new contract awards for SBIR and STTR program requirements for 
DoD. Approximately 66% of those new contract actions were awarded to 
1,891 of unique small business and nontraditional DoD entities.
    This final rule does not include any new reporting or recordkeeping 
requirements for small entities.
    There are no known significant alternative approaches to the final 
rule that would meet the requirements of the applicable statute.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This final rule does not contain any information collection 
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and 
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 206, 215, 234, and 235

    Government procurement.

Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR parts 206, 215, 234, and 235 are amended as 
follows:

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 206, 215, 234, and 235 
continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 206--COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

0
2. Subpart 206.1, consisting of 206.102, is added to read as follows:

Subpart 206.1--Full and Open Competition


206.102  Use of competitive procedures.

    (d) Other competitive procedures.
    (2) In lieu of FAR 6.102(d)(2), competitive selection of science 
and technology proposals resulting from a broad agency announcement 
with peer or scientific review, as described in 235.016(a) (10 U.S.C. 
2302(2)(B)).

PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

0
3. Section 215.371-4 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as 
follows:


215.371-4  Exceptions.

    (a) * * *
    (4) Acquisitions of science and technology, as specified in 
235.016(a); or
* * * * *

PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

0
4. Section 234.005-1 is amended by--
0
a. Removing paragraph (2);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (1) and (1)(i) through (iii) as introductory 
text and paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;
0
c. In the newly redesignated introductory text, removing ``general 
solicitation'' and adding ``broad agency announcement'' in its place;
0
d. In the newly redesignated paragraph (2) removing ``12 months'' and 
adding ``2 years'' in its place; and
0
e. Revising the newly redesignated paragraph (3) to read as follows:


234.005-1  Competition.

* * * * *
    (3) The dollar value of the work to be performed pursuant to the 
contract line

[[Page 4366]]

item or contract option shall not exceed $100 million in fiscal year 
2017 constant dollars. (10 U.S.C. 2302e)

PART 235--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING

0
5. Section 235.006-71 is amended by--
0
a. Redesignating the introductory text as paragraph (b); and
0
b. Adding paragraph (a).
    The addition reads as follows:


235.006--71  Competition.

    (a) Use of a broad agency announcement with peer or scientific 
review for the award of science and technology proposals in accordance 
with 235.016(a) fulfills the requirement for full and open competition 
(see 206.102(d)(2)).
* * * * *

0
6. Section 235.016 is added to read as follows:


235.016  Broad agency announcement.

    (a) General. A broad agency announcement with peer or scientific 
review may be used for the award of science and technology proposals. 
Science and technology proposals include proposals for the following:
    (i) Basic research (budget activity 6.1).
    (ii) Applied research (budget activity 6.2).
    (iii) Advanced technology development (budget activity 6.3).
    (iv) Advanced component development and prototypes (budget activity 
6.4).

[FR Doc. 2019-02527 Filed 2-14-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P