[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65560-65562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27557]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
[Docket DARS-2018-0004]
RIN 0750-AJ22
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Restrictions
on Acquisitions From Foreign Sources (DFARS Case 2017-D011)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement sections of the
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 to apply
domestic source requirements to acquisitions at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold when acquiring athletic footwear to be furnished
to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry into
the Armed Forces, and add Australia and the United Kingdom to the
definition of the ``National Technology and Industrial Base.''
DATES: Effective December 21, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy G. Williams, telephone 571-
372-6106.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 83 FR
42828 on August 24, 2018, to implement sections 817 and 881(b) of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017.
Section 817 extends the domestic source requirements of 10 U.S.C.
2533a (the Berry Amendment) below the simplified acquisition threshold,
when acquiring athletic footwear to be furnished to the members of the
Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into
the Armed Forces.
Section 881(b) amends 10 U.S.C. 2500(1) by adding Australia and the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to the United
States and Canada as the countries within which the activities of the
national technology and industrial base are conducted. 10 U.S.C. 2534,
Miscellaneous Limitations on the Procurement of Goods Other Than United
States Goods, requires that DoD only procure certain items if the
manufacturer of the items is part of the national technology and
industrial base.
One respondent submitted a public comment in response to the
proposed rule.
II. Discussion and Analysis
The public comment received addressed concern with regard to
importation of radioactive steel and use of radioactively contaminated
scrap metal. This issue is outside the scope of this rule. There were
no changes from the proposed rule as a result of this public comment.
However, the final rule is affected by a change in the baseline. On
May 30, 2018, DoD published a final rule in the Federal Register (83 FR
24890) to amend the DFARS to implement section 813(a) of the NDAA for
FY 2018 (Pub. L. 115-91), which amended 10 U.S.C. 2534(c) to establish
a sunset date of October 1, 2018, for the limitation on procurement of
chemical weapons antidote contained in automatic injectors (and
components for such injectors). The final rule deleted DFARS 225.7005
in its entirety to remove the limitation as implemented in the DFARS.
As a result, this final rule does not include the changes proposed to
DFARS 225.7005-1.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule amends the applicability of existing DFARS solicitation
provisions and contract clauses as follows:
To implement section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2017, this
rule extends use of DFARS clause 252.225-7012, Preference for Certain
Domestic Commodities, to acquisitions at or below the simplified
acquisition threshold (SAT) when buying athletic footwear to be
furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial
entry into the Armed Forces. This clause is already prescribed for use
in solicitations and contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the
acquisition of commercial items, including commercially available off-
the-shelf (COTS) items.
[[Page 65561]]
To implement section 881(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017, this
rule modifies the provision at DFARS 252.225-7037, Evaluation of Offers
for Air Circuit Breakers, and the clause at DFARS 252.225-7038,
Restriction on Acquisition of Air Circuit Breakers, to add Australia as
a country from which items restricted by 10 U.S.C. 2534 may be
purchased. This rule does not change the prescriptions for the use of
this provision or clause, which are already required for use in
solicitations and contracts for commercial items, including COTS items.
The clause does not apply below the SAT.
A. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the SAT
41 U.S.C. 1905 governs the applicability of laws to contracts or
subcontracts in amounts not greater than the SAT. It is intended to
limit the applicability of laws to such contracts or subcontracts. 41
U.S.C. 1905 provides that if a provision of law contains criminal or
civil penalties, or if the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council
makes a written determination that it is not in the best interest of
the Federal Government to exempt contracts or subcontracts at or below
the SAT, the law will apply to them. The Director, Defense Pricing and
Contracting (DPC), is the appropriate authority to make comparable
determinations for regulations to be published in the DFARS, which is
part of the FAR system of regulations.
B. Applicability to Contracts for the Acquisition of Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
41 U.S.C. 1906 governs the applicability of laws to contracts for
the acquisition of commercial items and is intended to limit the
applicability of laws to contracts for the acquisition of commercial
items. 41 U.S.C. 1906 provides that if a provision of law contains
criminal or civil penalties, or if the FAR Council makes a written
determination that it is not in the best interest of the Federal
Government to exempt commercial item contracts, the provision of law
will apply to contracts for the acquisition of commercial items.
Likewise, 41 U.S.C. 1907 governs the applicability of laws to COTS
items, with the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy the
decision authority to determine that it is in the best interest of the
Government to apply a provision of law to acquisitions of COTS items in
the FAR. The Director, DPC, is the appropriate authority to make
comparable determinations for regulations to be published in the DFARS,
which is part of the FAR system of regulations.
C. Determinations
A determination under 41 U.S.C. 1905 is not required to prescribe
DFARS 252.225-7012 for use in solicitations and contracts valued at or
below the SAT, because section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2017 specifically
states that DoD shall acquire athletic footwear that complies with the
requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2533a ``without regard to the applicability
of any simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of title 10
(or any other provision of law).''
A determination under 41 U.S.C. 1906 and 1907 is not required to
apply the requirements of DFARS 252.225-7037 and 252.225-7038 to
acquisitions for commercial items, including COTS items, because the
statute that this provision and clause implements is not a covered
statute subject to 41 U.S.C. 1905-1907. At the time of the Federal
Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994 (FASA) (Pub. L. 103-355), now
codified in part at 41 U.S.C. 1905-1907, this provision and clause were
a single clause, DFARS 252.225-7029, Restriction on Acquisition of Air
Circuit Breakers, which implemented 10 U.S.C. 2534. Because 10 U.S.C.
2534 predated FASA, it was not subject to 41 U.S.C. 1905-1907. The
DFARS clause 252.225-7029 was included on the initial list of statutes
applicable to the acquisition of commercial items at DFARS 252.212-
7001, incorporated in the DFARS by DFARS Case 95-D712 on November 30,
1995 (Defense Acquisition Circular 91-9).
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Executive Order 13771
This final rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is
not significant under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
This rule implements sections 817 and 881(b) of the National
Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub. L.
114-328). The objective of the rule is to--
Remove the exception to domestic source restriction of the
Berry Amendment (10 U.S.C. 2533a) for acquisitions at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold when buying athletic footwear to be
furnished to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial
entry into the Armed Forces, as required by section 817 of the NDAA for
FY 2017; and
Allow acquisition of certain items from Australia and the
United Kingdom, for which purchase is currently restricted to items
from the United States or Canada, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2534, in
accordance with section 881(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017 and 10 U.S.C.
2534.
There were no significant issues raised by the public comment in
response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
With regard to implementation of section 817, this rule may apply
to only a few small entities, because there are few sources that meet
the domestic source requirements of the Berry Amendment with regard to
athletic footwear. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) estimates a
potential annual demand for approximately 200,000 to 250,000 pairs of
athletic shoes to be delivered at the rate of approximately 27,500
pairs per month. In response to a request for information issued by DLA
in December 2016, there were 5 responses from athletic footwear
manufacturers, one of which was a small business. Small entities who
are athletic shoe manufacturers could likely support portions of the
Department's total requirements for athletic footwear. In addition,
there are likely a number of domestic component suppliers who are small
entities who would benefit from this new requirement as well. On the
other hand, small entities that cannot provide athletic shoes that meet
the domestic source requirements of the Berry Amendment, will no longer
be able to compete for acquisition of athletic footwear at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold that are for the purpose of providing
athletic
[[Page 65562]]
footwear to enlisted members of the Armed Forces upon their initial
entry into the Armed Forces.
With regard to implementation of section 881(b), this rule will not
apply to any small entities at the prime contract level, as there are
only a few prime contractors for the restricted items, which are all
U.S. firms that are other than small businesses. For the definition of
``small business,'' the Regulatory Flexibility Act refers to the Small
Business Act, which in turn allows the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) Administrator to specify detailed definitions or
standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)). The SBA regulations
at 13 CFR 121.105(a)(1) discuss who is a small business, providing that
except for small agricultural cooperatives, a business concern eligible
for assistance from SBA as a small business is a business entity
organized for profit, with a place of business located in the United
States, and which operates primarily within the United States or which
makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of
taxes or use of American products, materials or labor. Therefore, if an
item currently purchased from a U.S. entity that is other than a small
business were to be purchased from an entity in the Australia or the
United Kingdom, there could be an impact on a few small entities that
are currently subcontractors to a U.S. prime contractor.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance
requirements of the rule, other than to furnish athletic footwear
compliant with the Berry Amendment and the other restricted items
manufactured by a manufacturer that is part of the national technology
and industrial base (which is now expanded to include the United
Kingdom and Australia, as well as the United States and Canada).
By extending the restriction of the Berry Amendment to acquisitions
that do not exceed simplified acquisition threshold, this rule may
benefit small entities that can provide Berry Amendment-compliant
athletic footwear, because they may be more able to compete for smaller
acquisitions. DoD was unable to identify any alternatives that would
meet the requirements of the statutes).
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 225 and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 225 and 252 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 225 and 252 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 225--FOREIGN ACQUISITION
0
2. Amend section 225.7002-2 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
225.7002-2 Exceptions.
* * * * *
(a) Acquisitions at or below the simplified acquisition threshold,
except for athletic footwear purchased by DoD for use by members of the
Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps upon their initial entry into
the Armed Forces (section 817 of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328)).
* * * * *
225.7002-3 [Amended]
0
3. Amend section 225.7002-3, in paragraph (a) by removing ``commercial
items, that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold'' and adding
``commercial items'' in its place.
225.7004-1 [Amended]
0
4. Amend section 225.7004-1 by removing ``United States or Canada'' and
adding ``United States, Australia, Canada, or the United Kingdom'' in
its place.
225.7004-3 [Amended]
0
5. Amend section 225.7004-3 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a) by removing ``manufactured in the United States or
Canada'' and adding ``manufactured in the United States, Australia,
Canada, or the United Kingdom'' in two places.
0
b. In paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) by removing ``United States and
Canada'' and adding ``United States, Australia, Canada, or the United
Kingdom'' in its place wherever it appears.
225.7006-1 [Amended]
0
6. Amend section 225.7006-1 by removing ``United States or Canada'' and
adding ``United States, Australia, Canada, or the United Kingdom'' in
its place.
0
7. Revise section 225.7006-3 to read as follows:
225.7006-3 Waiver.
The waiver criteria at 225.7008(a) apply to this restriction.
0
8. Amend section 225.7006-4 by revising paragraphs (a)(2) and (b)(2) to
read as follows:
225.7006-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause.
(a) * * *
(2) A waiver has been granted.
(b) * * *
(2) A waiver has been granted.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
252.225-7037 [Amended]
0
9. Amend section 252.225-7037 by:
0
a. Removing the provision date of ``(JUN 2012)'' and adding ``(DEC
2018)'' in its place; and
0
b. In paragraphs (a) and (b), removing ``outlying areas, Canada,'' and
adding ``outlying areas, Australia, Canada,'' in its place in both
places.
252.225-7038 [Amended]
0
10. Amend section 252.225-7038 by:
0
a. Removing the provision date of ``(JUN 2005)'' and adding ``(DEC
2018)'' on its place; and
0
b. Removing ``outlying areas, Canada,'' and adding ``outlying areas,
Australia, Canada,'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2018-27557 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P