[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 223 (Monday, November 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 58298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25091]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1046]
Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same;
Commission Determination To Rescind Remedial Orders Issued in This
Investigation Based Upon License and Settlement
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to rescind the limited exclusion order and
cease and desist orders issued in this investigation based upon
settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin Hughes, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3042. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
1046 on April 12, 2017, based on a complaint filed by Macronix
International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc.
of Milpitas, California (collectively, ``Macronix''). 82 FR 17687-88
(Apr. 12, 2017). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain non-volatile memory
devices and products containing the same that infringe certain claims
of U.S. Patent No. 6,552,360; U.S. Patent No. 6,788,602 (``the '602
patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,035,417. The Notice of Investigation
named the following respondents: Toshiba Corporation of Tokyo, Japan;
Toshiba America, Inc. of New York, New York; Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc. of Irvine, California; Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc. of Irvine, California; and Toshiba Information Equipment
(Philippines), Inc. of Binan, Philippines (collectively, ``Toshiba'').
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a party to
the investigation.
On June 16, 2017, the Commission determined not to review the ALJ's
order (Order No. 11) granting an unopposed motion to amend the Notice
of Investigation to add Toshiba Memory Corporation of Tokyo, Japan as a
respondent. See Order 11, Comm'n Notice of Non-Review (June 16, 2017).
On April 13, 2018, the ALJ issued her final initial determination
finding no violation of section 337 violation with respect to the
asserted patents. On June 28, 2018, the Commission determined to review
the final ID in part. See 83 FR 31416-18 (July 5, 2018). On review, the
Commission found a violation of section 337 in connection with asserted
claim 6 of the '602 patent. See 83 FR 51980-82 (Oct. 15, 2018). Having
found a violation, the Commission determined that the appropriate
remedy is a limited exclusion order (``LEO'') against Toshiba's
infringing products and cease and desist orders (``CDOs'') against the
domestic Toshiba respondents. See id.
On October 15, 2018, Macronix and Toshiba filed a joint petition to
rescind the LEO and CDOs based upon a license and settlement agreement.
The petition states that rescission is warranted because ``the specific
conduct covered by the Remedial Orders has become authorized or
licensed by way of settlement and license.'' Petition at 2. On October
25, 2018, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response in
support of the petition. No other party filed response or opposition to
the petition.
In view of the settlement agreement between Macronix and Toshiba,
the Commission finds that the conditions justifying the remedial orders
no longer exist, and therefore, granting the petition is warranted
under 19 U.S.C. 1337(k) and 19 CFR 210.76(a). Accordingly, the
Commission has determined to rescind the remedial orders.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 13, 2018.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2018-25091 Filed 11-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P