[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56713-56734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24747]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510; FRL-9986-42-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS95
Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action amends certain existing testing regulations to
reflect corrections, updates, and the addition of alternative equipment
and methods for source testing of emissions. These revisions will
improve the quality of data and provide flexibility in the use of
[[Page 56714]]
approved alternative procedures. The revisions do not impose any new
substantive requirements on source owners or operators.
DATES: The final rule is effective on January 14, 2019. The
incorporation by reference materials listed in the rule are approved by
the Director of the Federal Register as of January 14, 2019.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
confidential business information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically through http://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplementary information in this
preamble is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
C. Judicial Review
II. Background
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Db) Part 60
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is
Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20,
1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) Part 63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional
Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and
1 CFR part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The revisions promulgated in this final rule apply to industries
that are subject to the current provisions of 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the
specific affected industries or their North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes herein since there are many
affected sources in numerous NAICS categories. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
We are promulgating corrections and updates to regulations for
source testing of emissions. More specifically, we are correcting
typographical and technical errors, updating obsolete testing
procedures, adding approved testing alternatives, and clarifying
testing requirements.
C. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review
of this final rule is available by filing a petition for review in the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by
January 14, 2019. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an
objection to this final rule that was raised with reasonable
specificity during the period for public comment can be raised during
judicial review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the
requirements that are the subject of this final rule may not be
challenged later in civil or criminal proceedings brought by the EPA to
enforce these requirements.
II. Background
The revisions to testing regulations for air emission sources were
proposed in the Federal Register on January 26, 2018 (83 FR 3636). The
public comment period ended March 27, 2018, and 83 comment letters were
received from the public; 23 of the comment letters were relevant, and
the other 60 comment letters were considered beyond the scope of the
proposed rule. This final rule was developed based on public comments
that the agency received on the proposed rule.
III. Summary of Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the denominator of equation 24 is
corrected
[[Page 56715]]
as proposed; the proposed c'p in the denominator is changed
to Cp' to be consistent with the nomenclature in section
12.1. The cp in the numerator is changed to Cp
also to be consistent with the nomenclature in section 12.1.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the statement regarding equation
204-2 is corrected to ``The NEAR must be <=0.05,'' as proposed.
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 is revised to allow the use of
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable
transfer standards to calibrate the gas dilution system as proposed.
The agency continues to believe that these standards are widely
available and provide the accuracy necessary to perform the
calibration. Section 2.1.1 is also revised as proposed to require
testers to report the results of the calibration of the dilution system
to enable the regulatory authority to review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60, Sec. 60.17(h) is revised as
proposed to add ASTM D6216-12 to the list of incorporations by
reference and to re-number the remaining consensus standards that are
incorporated by reference in alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.46(b)(2)(i) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) is not revised. Based on comments we received on
the proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed
revisions of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder
heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart
Db) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.46b(d)(4) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.45c(a)(5) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part
60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
60.58a(b)(3) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing the proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperatures in
Sec. Sec. 60.293(f) and 60.296(d)(2) are not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH, in section 13.5.1, equation 8 is
corrected as proposed.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the definition of ambient carbon
dioxide concentration is revised as proposed. The agency continues to
believe that the global monthly mean (CO2)a
concentration varies over time. Also, a website link is added to the
definition as specified at proposal.
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, allowed filter temperatures in Method 5,
sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 are not revised. Based
on comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
Section 6.1.1.9 is revised as proposed to allow the use of a single
temperature sensor in lieu of two temperature sensors on the dry gas
meter as allowed by Technical Information Document 19 (TID-19) and the
approved broadly applicable alternative, ALT-117 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc). Consistent with our response to the comment regarding
allowing flexibility for the weighing container in section 11.2.1,
Method 5B, the first sentence in section 11.2.1, Method 5 is revised
similarly.
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperatures in
Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and 8.2 are not revised. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating
[[Page 56716]]
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
Section 11.0 is revised as proposed to replace the reference to
Method 5, section 11.0 with specific analytical procedures and to
report the results using Figure 5B-1 for complete data review. Section
17.0 is revised as proposed to delete the word ``Reserved'' from the
title, and Figure 5B-1 (Analytical Data Sheet) is added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In a change from proposal, Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 are
not revised to tighten the allowed filter temperatures. Based on
comments we received on the proposed revisions, we are deferring
finalizing the proposed revisions of the temperature tolerances of
probe and filter holder heating systems as part of this rulemaking. We
will continue to review supporting information and data we received on
the proposed rule and may propose either revisions or similar
requirements as part of future rulemakings.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 reference erroneous sections;
the correct section is inserted, as proposed. The proposed referenced
section 10.1.1.2 is changed to 10.1.1 to include procedures in both
sections 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
As proposed, Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 are
renumbered to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1 is added
to clarify the requirements that apply to the probe nozzle; and, in
response to comments, Figure 8-1 (Sulfuric Acid Sampling Train) is
corrected by: (1) Modifying the impinger graphics to make it consistent
with the text in section 6.1.1.4 and (2) revising the proposed label S-
Type Pitot Tube to Type S Pitot Tube for consistency. The proposed
first sentence in section 6.1.1.1 is revised to ``Borosilicate or
quartz glass with a sharp, tapered leading edge and coupled to the
probe liner using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glass-lined union
(e.g., fused silica, Silico, or equivalent).'' Based on a public
comment that recommended adding Silco coated stainless steel unions as
an option for Teflon unions, and for consistency with other test
methods, we have replaced Teflon with the generic option
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE).
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the erroneous paragraph (c)
designation is re-designated as (b), as proposed.
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 are revised as proposed to
allow digital photography to be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements. As proposed, section 11.2.3 is added to specify the
requirements for digital photographic records. In response to comments
on the proposal, the next to the last sentence in section 11.2.3
regarding photographs that must be taken within 15 minutes of the
observation period is revised from the proposal, and another sentence
is added to provide clarity. The revised and new sentences read: ``The
photograph(s) representing the environmental conditions including the
sky conditions and the position of the sun relative to the observer and
the emission point must be taken within a reasonable time of the
observation (i.e., 15 minutes). When observations are taken from
exactly the same observation point on a routine basis (e.g., daily) and
as long as there are no modifications to the units depicted, only a
single photograph each day is necessary to document the observer's
location relative to the emissions source, the process unit being
observed, and the location of potential and actual emission points.''
The agency notes that ALT-109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc) is the
associated broadly applicable alternative that allows the use of
digital photographs for specific recordkeeping requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
As proposed, Method 26, section 6.2.2 is revised to allow the use
of glass sample storage containers as an option to allow flexibility
and to be consistent with Method 26A. The proposed title of section
6.2.2, ``Storage Bottles,'' is changed to ``Storage Containers'' to be
consistent with the language in section 6.2.2.
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
As proposed, in Method 26A, section 6.2.1 is revised to remove the
language regarding sample storage containers. In response to comments
on our proposal, we have determined that high-density polyethylene is
an acceptable material for sample storage containers in addition to the
currently allowed glass. Therefore, in a new section 6.2.4., we have
specified that both high-density polyethylene and glass are acceptable
sample storage containers.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in section 13.5.1 is corrected, as
proposed.
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 1, references to ASTM
D6216-98 (in sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1),
8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 paragraph 8) are
replaced with ASTM D6216-12. As noted at proposal, if the initial
certification of the continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) has
already occurred using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it will not be
necessary to recertify using D6216-12. In response to comments on our
decision to add ASTM D6216 to the list of consensus standards, the
April 1998 publication date for ASTM D6216 in paragraph 8 in section
16.0 is replaced with October 2012, the ASTM D6216-12 publication date.
In response to comments, for consistency with section 2.1, and for
purposes of clarification, the note at the end of section 2.1 is added
to section 13.0.
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2, section 13.2 is replaced with a
table that indicates the relative accuracy performance specifications,
as proposed. Given that the equals to (=) signs were erroneously
omitted from several of the < and > values during publication of the
table in the proposed rule, these values have been corrected.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the two sentences in section 12.0
that read, ``Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the
CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine (or more)
data sets constitute the RA.'' are deleted, as proposed; these two
sentences are no longer necessary since equations 3-1 and 3-2 would be
moved from section 13.2 to section 12.0. The sentence, ``Calculate the
RA using equations 3-1 and 3-2.'' is added to the beginning of section
12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11, section 13.1, the word ``average''
erroneously exists in the second sentence and is deleted, as proposed.
[[Page 56717]]
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 15, section 13.0 is added
as ``Method Performance [Reserved].''
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
As proposed, in Performance Specification 18, in section 11.8.7,
the last sentence is revised to clarify the duration of the drift
check. In Table 1, the erroneous acronym ``NO2'' is replaced
with ``NO,'' as proposed. In the appendix of Performance Specification
18, the inadvertently omitted reserved section 12.0 is added, as
proposed.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
As proposed, in Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence
immediately following the table that reads, ``Challenge the CEMS three
times at each audit point, and use the average of the three responses
in determining accuracy.'' is replaced with, ``Introduce each of the
audit gases, three times each for a total of six challenges. Introduce
the gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not
introduce the same gas concentration twice in succession.'' In order to
obtain six distinct readings during the cylinder gas audit (CGA), the
same gas must not be introduced twice in succession, and this revised
language accurately reflects this standard scientific practice. As also
proposed, in section 5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA's traceability
protocol for gaseous calibration standards is updated, and the language
regarding the use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit gases is
clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and 63.8(e)(5)(i) of the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63 are revised, as proposed, to
require the reporting of specific test data for continuous monitoring
system performance evaluation tests and ongoing quality assurance (QA)
tests. These data elements are required regardless of the format of the
report, i.e., electronic or paper. These modifications will ensure that
performance evaluation and QA test reporting include all data necessary
for the compliance authority to assess and assure the quality of the
reported data and that the reported information describes and
identifies the specific unit covered by the evaluation test report. In
response to comment, we specified the level of reporting needed for
continuous parameter monitoring systems (CPMS) versus other continuous
monitoring systems including continuous emission monitoring systems
(CEMS), COMS, and predictive emissions monitoring systems (PEMS).
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.1385(a)(5) is not revised. Based on comments we received on the
proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions of
the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating systems
as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the proposed rule and may propose
either revisions or similar requirements as part of future rulemakings.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
As proposed, in Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f. is revised to
allow the use of EPA SW-846-7471B (for liquid samples) in addition to
EPA SW-846-7470A for measuring mercury to allow for compliance
flexibility.
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
In a change from proposal, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) is not revised. Based on comments we received on
the proposed revisions, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions
of the temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating
systems as part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review
supporting information and data we received on the proposed rule and
may propose either revisions or similar requirements as part of future
rulemakings.
As proposed, in Table 5, Method 5I is specified as a test method
option because, as explained at proposal, Method 5I is designed for low
particulate matter (PM) application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation 303-3 is corrected, as
proposed, by inserting ``where y = '' in front of the equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
As proposed, in Method 308, deionized distilled water replaces the
aqueous n-proponal solution; the affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2,
7.2.3.3, and 11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines the aqueous n-
proponal solution, is removed, as proposed. In section 7.2.3.3, the
erroneous ``four'' is replaced as proposed, with ``three'' in the
sentence that reads ``Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this standard,
respectively into four 50-ml volumetric flasks.'' Section 8.1.2 is
revised, as proposed, to require a leak check prior to the sampling run
(in addition to after the sampling run) for QA purposes; as explained
at proposal, requiring a leak check prior to the sampling run would
potentially save time and money. In section 9.1, methanol spike
recovery check is added as a quality control (QC) measure in Table 9.1,
as proposed. In section 12.1, variables used in equations 308-4 and
308-5 are added and section 12.5, which includes equations 308-4 and
308-5, is added, as proposed. In section 13.0, the title ``Reserved''
is replaced with ``Method Performance'' and QA requirements would be
added to be consistent with other methods, as proposed. The erroneous
proposed paragraph (a) of section 13.0 is replaced, as proposed, with
``Calibration standards must meet the requirements in section 10.2.1 or
10.2.2 as applicable.''
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in equation 2 is corrected from
PSS to PS, as proposed. In section 9.2.3, the
word ``where'' in the statement, ``Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows: where:'' is deleted, as proposed. Also in
section 9.2.3, the inadvertently superscripted ``dir'' on the
definition of spike is subscripted, as proposed.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the denominator in equation 323-8 is
corrected, as proposed.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 is revised, as proposed, to clarify
that only one extra sampling site is required near known sources of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when the source is located both
within 50 meters of the boundary and between two monitors. Based on a
public comment we received on the proposed regulatory text, wording
changes have been made to the language in section 8.2.1.3. As proposed,
the label under Figure 8.1 is corrected from ``Refinery (20% angle)''
to ``Refinery (20[deg] angle).'' Section 8.2.3.2 is revised, as
proposed, to include facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet). Section 8.2.3.3 is added, as
[[Page 56718]]
proposed, to provide clarification and an equivalent procedure in
Option 2 (linear distance between sites) for site locations that
parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1 (radial distance between sites).
In response to comments, section 8.4.3 is added to address worker
safety during extenuating circumstances.
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 is revised, as proposed, to correct
an error in the number of field blank samples required for a sampling
period and to provide consistency with the sample analysis required in
Method 325B. In sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to
section 10.6.3 is corrected to 10.0, as proposed. Also in section
11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section 10.9.5 is corrected to
9.13, as proposed. Section 12.2.2 is revised, as proposed, to correct
the calculation of target compound concentrations at standard
conditions, and the erroneous reference to Ustd in the note
in section 12.2.2 is revised to UNTP. Sections 12.2.3 and
12.2.4 are deleted, as proposed, because the equations for target
concentrations are incorrect. Table 17-1 is revised, as proposed, to
add inadvertently omitted QC criteria from section 9.3.3.
IV. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
Eighty-three (83) comment letters were received from the public; 23
of the comment letters were relevant, and the other 60 comment letters
were considered as beyond the scope of the proposed rule. The public
comments and the agency's responses are summarized in the Response to
Comments document located in the docket for this rule. See the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
A summary of the relevant portions of significant comments that we
received on the proposal and agency responses are presented below.
Comment: Three commenters provided comments on our proposed
revisions to the General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63. One
commenter stated that the proposed revisions impose new requirements on
CMS performance evaluations and QA testing for types of monitors not
previously subject to such requirements. Another commenter remarked
that the proposed revisions to various requirements in Part 63
revisions were vague. Yet another commenter remarked that the proposed
revisions to Sec. 63.8(e)(5) would shorten the CMS performance
evaluation reporting period for CMS associated with performance tests.
Response: We disagree with the comment that the proposed changes to
Sec. 63.8(e)(5)(i) would impose new requirements given that at
proposal, the agency had explained that they were intended to clarify
and codify data elements and reporting requirements that are already
routinely requested by the Administrator's delegated authorities. With
regard to Sec. 63.8(e)(5), in a change from proposal, we have retained
the existing requirement that allows for the simultaneous submission of
the report of a CMS performance evaluation with results of performance
testing required under 40 CFR 63.7. We also edited the final rule
language for 40 CFR 63.7(g)(2)(v) to improve clarity and to eliminate
confusion.
Comment: Fifteen commenters provided comments arguing against the
proposal to tighten the filter temperature tolerance in 40 CFR
60.46(b)(2)(i); 60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A); 60.45c(a)(5); 60.58a(b)(3);
60.293(f); 60.296(d)(2); 63.1385(a)(5); and sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2,
6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7 and 8.5 of Method 5, Appendix A-3 of Part 60. They
cited issues that included: weather (e.g., ambient temperature
fluctuations and windy conditions); costs; lack of justification and
data for the revision; inconsistent language (e.g., the use of
``shall'' vs. ``may'' and proposed revisions to temperature tolerance
in Methods 5, 5B, and 5I but not in Methods 5D, 5E, and 5F); and safety
risks. Nine commenters remarked that ambient conditions (cold climates,
wind gusts, etc.) can cause temperature fluctuations that are difficult
to manage. More specifically, one commenter stated that the reduced
allowable temperature range would be problematic during testing in
cold, windy ambient conditions that are persistent in the winter months
in northern climates because the time required for temperature recovery
after a component change in these conditions could add hours and
possibly days to testing programs. One commenter remarked that the
proposed 5 [deg]C is unattainable for sources in cold or
windy climates.
Eight commenters stated that alteration or replacement of equipment
components would likely be necessary to achieve the proposed
temperature tolerances resulting in additional costs. One commenter
noted potential equipment improvements, such as increased probe sheath
tubing diameter to make room for added insulation around every probe
heater; re-design of filter heating ovens; improved sealing and
insulation of the openings at the inlet and outlet of filter heating
ovens; and/or for sources with high stack temperatures, more frequent
use of air-cooled or water-cooled probes. One commenter remarked that
this revision would force cold weather stack testers to replace or
retrofit equipment with higher power heating devices and possibly more
refined control devices which would be costly. One commenter remarked
that this revision will most likely require air sampling equipment
suppliers to redesign sample probes by either increasing sheath
diameter, altering the placement or increasing the number of
thermocouples used to control the probe heating system, and/or
increasing the insulation around the sample liner. The commenter added
that an increase in the diameter of the probe sheath would have a
cascading effect either requiring test companies to purchase new sample
hot boxes or retrofit existing sample hot boxes to accommodate the
increased probe sheath diameter.
Seven commenters stated that neither information nor data was
provided to support, justify, or quantify the claimed increased
precision of filterable PM measurements, and a few of these commenters
noted that the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) paper that the
EPA used as the basis for tightening the filter temperature tolerance
was from a comparison of results measured at four coal-fired power
plants.
One commenter requested that the statement in Sec.
60.50Da(b)(1)(ii)(A), ``The probe and filter holder heating system in
the sampling train may be set to provide an average gas temperature of
no greater than 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),''
be changed to, ``The probe and filter holder heating system in the
sampling train shall be set to provide an average gas temperature of
160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),'' because they
believe that this was the agency's intent. Similarly, another commenter
requested that the statement in Sec. 60.296(d)(2), ``The probe and
filter holder heating system may be set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F),'' be
changed to, ``The probe and filter holder heating system shall be set
to provide an average gas temperature 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F),'' because they believe that this was the
agency's intent. One commenter also recommended changing the sentence
in Method 5B to, ``The collected sample is then heated in an oven at
160 [deg]C (320 [deg]F) for 6 hours . . . ,'' to, ``The collected
sample is then heated in an oven at 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F) for 6 hours . . .,'' to be internally consistent.
Three commenters noted that if the temperature tolerances are
changed in Method 5, methods that reference Method 5 (namely Method 5D,
section
[[Page 56719]]
2.1; Method 5E, section 2.0; and Method 5F, section 2.0) would also
need to be revised.
Three commenters remarked that tightening the filter temperature
tolerance conflicts with the assertion that the proposed rule will
improve the quality of data but will not impose new substantive
requirements. Two of the three commenters further remarked that the
proposed rule does not meet the requirements of Executive Order 13771
nor the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
Three commenters acknowledged that an improvement in measurement
precision could benefit the data quality in limited situations, such as
the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS).
Four commenters remarked that if the proposed revisions to the
temperature tolerances lead to a measurable change in reported PM
emissions, sources that were previously in compliance with their
emission standards may become non-compliant; one commenter added that
the opposite situation may occur. One commenter stated that the
proposed revision may have the unintended consequence of redefining the
filterable PM being measured leading to either higher or lower PM
measurements as compared to sampling runs conducted with wider
tolerances.
Two commenters mentioned that this revision could result in a
potential safety risk. One of the commenters remarked that the added
weight and handling difficulties associated with air- or water-cooled
probes (if necessary to control the probe temperature) can increase
safety risks to testing personnel, and the other commenter remarked
that the proposed requirements may require the use of encapsulated
probes which are heavy and cumbersome resulting in hazards.
Response: In response to these comments and in a change from
proposal, we are deferring finalizing proposed revisions of the
temperature tolerances of probe and filter holder heating systems as
part of this rulemaking. We will continue to review supporting
information and data we received on the proposed rule and may propose
either revisions or similar requirements as part of future rulemakings.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule provides meaningful burden reduction by
allowing regulated facilities the flexibility to use newly-approved
alternative procedures for compliance demonstration purposes, which may
result in lower labor costs for some facilities (e.g., allowing digital
photography in lieu of manual documentation in EPA Method 22); lower
compliance testing costs (e.g., additional sample storage container
options now allowed by Method 26); reducing the likelihood of re-
testing (e.g., revised QA requirements in Method 308); and expediting
data processing (e.g., simplified calculations in Method 325B).
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. The revisions do not substantively revise the existing
information collection requirements but simply corrects, updates, and
clarifies performance testing and continuous monitoring requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action will not impose emission
measurement requirements beyond those specified in the current
regulations, nor does it change any emission standard. We have,
therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action simply corrects and updates existing
testing regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
part 51
This action involves technical standards. The EPA used ASTM D6216-
12 for continuous opacity monitors in Performance Specification 1. The
ASTM D6216-12 standard covers the procedure for certifying continuous
opacity monitors and includes design and performance specifications,
test procedures, and QA requirements to ensure that continuous opacity
monitors meet minimum design and calibration
[[Page 56720]]
requirements necessary, in part, for accurate opacity monitoring
measurements in regulatory environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216-12 standard was developed and adopted by the
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The standard may be
obtained from http://www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This action is a technical
correction to previously promulgated regulatory actions and does not
have an impact on human health or the environment.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each house of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
Dated: November 5, 2018.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Acting Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows:
0
a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in Method 201A.
0
b. Revise the last sentence in section 8.2 in Method 204.
0
c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary
Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
* * * * *
12.5 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.059
* * * * *
Method 204--Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary
Total Enclosure
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be <=0.05.
* * * * *
Method 205--Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations
* * * * *
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be recalibrated once per
calendar year using NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty <=0.25 percent. You shall report the results of the
calibration by the person or manufacturer who carried out the
calibration whenever the dilution system is used, listing the date
of the most recent calibration, the due date for the next
calibration, calibration point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for the
operation and use of the gas dilution system. A copy of the
manufacturer's instructions for the operation of the instrument, as
well as the most recent calibration documentation, shall be made
available for inspection at the test site.
* * * * *
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 60.17, revise paragraph (h)(177) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216-12, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications, approved October 1, 2012; IBR approved for appendix B
to part 60.
* * * * *
0
5. In Appendix A-1 to part 60, revise ``(CO2)a''
in section 12.1 in Method 2B to read as follows:
Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 through 2F
* * * * *
Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline
Vapor Incinerators
* * * * *
12.1 * * *
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration, ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be
assumed to equal the global monthly mean CO2
concentration posted at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data).
* * * * *
0
6. In appendix A-3 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 6.1.1.9 and 11.2.1 in Method 5.
0
b. Revise section 11.0 in Method 5B.
0
c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
[[Page 56721]]
Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 through 5I
* * * * *
Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump,
calibrated temperature sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment, as
shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic
checks of isokinetic rates. The average DGM temperature for use in
the calculations of section 12.0 may be obtained by averaging the
two temperature sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the DGM
as shown in Figure 5-3 or alternatively from a single temperature
sensor located at the immediate outlet of the DGM or the plenum of
the DGM.
* * * * *
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared weighing container. Desiccate for 24 hours in a
desiccator containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh to a constant
weight, and report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the
purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight'' means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less
tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings. Alternatively, the sample may be oven dried at 104 [deg]C
(220 [deg]F) for 2 to 3 hours, cooled in the desiccator, and weighed
to a constant weight, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. The sample may be oven dried at 104 [deg]C (220
[deg]F) for 2 to 3 hours. Once the sample has cooled, weigh the
sample, and use this weight as a final weight.
* * * * *
Method 5B-Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required on a sheet such as the
one shown in Figure 5B-1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared non-reactive oven-proof container. Oven dry the
filter sample at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320
9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours,
and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1
mg. For the purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight''
means a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total
weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, between two
consecutive weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time
between weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the
container, and confirm on the analysis sheet whether leakage
occurred during transport. If a noticeable amount of leakage has
occurred, either void the sample or use methods, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, to correct the final results. Measure
the liquid in this container either volumetrically to 1
ml or gravimetrically to 0.5 g. Transfer the contents to
a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at ambient
temperature and pressure. Then oven dry the probe sample at a
temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F)
for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to constant
weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica
gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step
may be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure the acetone in this
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the
acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh
to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as well as the acetone
blank container may be evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the
temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ``bumping,'' the evaporation process must be closely
supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled
occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as
acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.
* * * * *
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number -----------------------------------------------
Final weight Tare weight Weight gain
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.
2.
-----------------------------------------------
Total:
-----------------------------------------------
Less acetone blank
Weight of particulate
matter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of liquid water collected
---------------------------------------------------
Impinger volume, Silica gel weight,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ml g
---------------------------------------------------
Final
Initial
Liquid collected
Total volume g* ml
collected
* Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by
density of water (1 g/ml).
Figure 5B-1. Analytical Data Sheet
* * * * *
0
7. In appendix A-4 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in Method 7.
0
b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 as sections 6.1.1.2
through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
0
c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in Method 8.
0
d. Revise Figure 8-1 in Method 8.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B
* * * * *
[[Page 56722]]
Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
10.1.2 Determination of Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor
Kc. Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml of the
KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml = 100 [micro]g
NO2) to a series of five 50-ml volumetric flasks. To each
flask, add 25 ml of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add 1 N NaOH
to each flask until the pH is between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35
drops). Dilute to the mark with water. Mix thoroughly, and pipette a
25-ml aliquot of each solution into a separate porcelain evaporating
dish. Beginning with the evaporation step, follow the analysis
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution has been transferred to
the 100-ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum wavelength as determined
in section 10.1.1. This calibration procedure must be repeated on
each day that samples are analyzed. Calculate the spectrophotometer
calibration factor as shown in section 12.2.
* * * * *
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents of the flask thoroughly,
and measure the absorbance at the optimum wavelength used for the
standards (section 10.1.1), using the blank solution as a zero
reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the absorbance of the
400-[micro]g NO2 standard (see section 10.1.3).
* * * * *
Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or quartz glass with a sharp,
tapered leading edge and coupled to the probe liner using a
polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or glass-lined union (e.g., fused
silica, Slico, or equivalent). When the stack temperature exceeds
210 [deg]C (410 [deg]F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or other
leak free, non-contaminating fitting must be used to couple the
nozzle to the probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a one-piece
glass nozzle/liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall be
<=30[deg], and the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a
constant internal diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the button-
hook or elbow design, unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator. Other materials of construction may be used, subject
to the approval of the Administrator. A range of nozzle sizes
suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical nozzle
sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (\1/8\ to \1/2\ in) inside diameter
(ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (\1/16\ in). Larger nozzles sizes are
also available if higher volume sampling trains are used.
* * * * *
17.0 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.060
[[Page 56723]]
* * * * *
Appendix A-6 to Part 60--[Amended]
0
8. In Appendix A-6 to part 60, redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph
(b) in section 13.1 in Method 18.
0
9. In appendix A-7 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in Method 22.
0
b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E
* * * * *
Method 22--Visual Determination of Fugitive Emissions From Material
Sources and Smoke Emissions From Flares
* * * * *
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-1): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record also
the estimated wind speed, wind direction, and sky condition. Sketch
the process unit being observed, and note the observer location
relative to the source and the sun. Indicate the potential and
actual emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital
photography as described in section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset
of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-2): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record as
appropriate the type, location, and intensity of lighting on the
data sheet. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the
observer location relative to the source. Indicate the potential and
actual fugitive emission points on the sketch. Alternatively,
digital photography as described in section 11.2.3 may be used for a
subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records. Digital photographs,
annotated or unaltered, may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer's location relative to the source, observer's
location relative to the sun, process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points for the requirements in
sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The image must have the proper lighting,
field of view and depth of field to properly distinguish the sky
condition (if applicable), process unit, potential emission point
and actual emission point. At least one digital photograph must be
from the point of the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions including the sky
conditions and the position of the sun relative to the observer and
the emission point must be taken within a reasonable time of the
observation (i.e., 15 minutes). When observations are taken from
exactly the same observation point on a routine basis (i.e., daily)
and as long as there are no modifications to the units depicted,
only a single photograph each is necessary to document the
observer's location relative to the emissions source, the process
unit being observed, and the location of potential and actual
emission points. Any photographs altered or annotated must be
retained in an unaltered format for recordkeeping purposes.
* * * * *
0
10. In appendix A-8 to part 60:
0
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
0
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
0
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
0
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1 in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B
* * * * *
Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.2 Storage Containers. 100- or 250-ml, high-density
polyethylene or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw
cap liners to store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri
Dishes, Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and Rubber Policeman.
Same as Method 5, sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
* * * * *
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. High-density polyethylene or
glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating
Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
* * * * *
13.5.1 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.061
* * * * *
0
11. In appendix B to part 60:
0
a. Add the following entries to the list of Performance Specifications
in numeric order:
0
i. Performance Specification 12B--Specifications and Test Procedures
for Monitoring Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emissions From Stationary
Sources Using A Sorbent Trap Monitoring System
0
ii. Performance Specification 17 [Reserved]
0
iii. Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
0
iv. PS-18--Appendix A Standard Addition Procedures
0
b. In Performance Specification 1, remove ``D 6216-98'' wherever it
appears and add in its place ``D6216-12'', and revise section 2.1, the
introductory text of section 13.0, sections 13.1 and 13.2, and
paragraph 8. of section 16.0.
0
c. In Performance Specification 2, revise section 13.2.
0
d. In Performance Specification 3, revise sections 12.0 and 13.2.
0
e. In Performance Specification 11, revise section 13.1.
0
f. In Performance Specification 15, add reserved section 13.0.
0
g. In Performance Specification 18, revise section 11.8.7 and table 1
in section 17.0, and add reserved section 12.0 to PS-18.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications
* * * * *
Performance Specification 1--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1 ASTM D6216-12 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 60.17)
is the reference for design specifications, manufacturer's
performance specifications, and test procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and test an opacity monitor,
that is representative of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with the design
specifications in ASTM D6216-12. The opacity monitor manufacturer
must test each opacity monitor for conformance with the
manufacturer's performance specifications in ASTM D6216-12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor occurred before
November 14, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
* * * * *
13.0 What Specifications Does a COMS Have to Meet for
Certification?
[[Page 56724]]
A COMS must meet the following design, manufacturer's
performance, and field audit performance specifications:
Note: If the initial certification of the opacity monitor
occurred before November 14, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or
D6216-07, it is not necessary to recertify using D6216-12.A. COMS
must meet the following design, manufacturer's performance, and
field audit performance specifications.
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity monitoring equipment
must comply with the design specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
13.2 Manufacturer's Performance Specifications. The opacity
monitor must comply with the manufacturer's performance
specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216-12: Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. ASTM. October 2012.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 2--Specifications and Test Procedures for
SO2 and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance Specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calculate . . . RA criteria (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, with <=20.0
RATA are >=50% of emission RM in the
standard. denominator.
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, <=10.0
RATA are <50% of emission emission standard
standard. in the denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <=130 Use Eq. 2-6, <=15.0
but >=86 ng/J (0.30 and 0.20 lb/ emission standard
million Btu). in the denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <86 Use Eq. 2-6, <=20.0
ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu). emission standard
in the denominator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for
O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis
Calculate the RA using equations 3-1 and 3-2. Summarize the
results on a data sheet similar to that shown in Figure 2.2 of PS2.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.062
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.073
* * * * *
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of
the CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent of the mean value of
the reference method (RM) data when calculated using equation 3-1.
The results are also acceptable if the result of Equation 3-2 is
less than or equal to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
* * * * *
Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check performance specification?
Your daily PM CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate that the
daily drift of your PM CEMS does not deviate from the value of the
reference light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or other
technology-suitable reference standard by more than 2 percent of the
response range. If your CEMS includes diluent and/or auxiliary
monitors (for temperature, pressure, and/or moisture) that are
employed as a necessary part of this performance specification, you
must determine the calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see the appropriate
performance specification for the diluent CEMS specification). None
of the calibration drifts may exceed their individual specification.
* * * * *
[[Page 56725]]
Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.0 Method Performance [Reserved]
* * * * *
Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD for each day must be less
than 5.0 percent of the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7 consecutive operating
days.
* * * * *
17.0 * * *
Table 1--Interference Test Gas Concentrations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate concentration
Potential interferent gas \1\ (balance N2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO2....................................... 15% 1% CO2.\2\
CO........................................ 100 20 ppm.
CH2O...................................... 20 5 ppm.
CH4....................................... 100 20 ppm.
NH3....................................... 10 5 ppm
(extractive CEMS only).
NO........................................ 250 50 ppm.
SO2....................................... 200 20 ppm.
O2........................................ 3% 1% O2.\2\
H2O....................................... 10% 1% H2O.\2\
N2........................................ Balance.\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Any of these specific gases can be tested at a lower level if the
manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
\2\ Gases for short path IP cell interference tests cannot be added
above 100 percent stack equivalent concentration. Add these gases at
the indicated percentages to make up the remaining cell volume.
* * * * *
PS-18 Appendix A Standard Addition Procedures
* * * * *
12.0 [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
12. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and (3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F to
part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used For Compliance Determination
* * * * *
5.1.2 * * *
(1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant and diluent portions of
the CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of known concentration at
two points within the following ranges:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit range
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit point Diluent monitors for--
Pollutant monitors ----------------------------------------------------------
CO2 O2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... 20 to 30% of span 5 to 8% by volume.. 4 to 6% by volume.
value.
2............................... 50 to 60% of span 10 to 14% by volume 8 to 12% by volume.
value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduce each of the audit gases, three times each for a total
of six challenges. Introduce the gases in such a manner that the
entire CEMS is challenged. Do not introduce the same gas
concentration twice in succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit points 1 and 2. Do
not dilute gas from audit cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each audit point for a
sufficient period of time to assure adsorption-desorption of the
CEMS sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
* * * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials (CRM's) (See Citation 1)
audit gases that have been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference
Materials (SRM's) or EPA Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification
of Gaseous Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). Procedures for
preparation of CRM's are described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are described in Citation 2. In
the case that a suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may be used to dilute CRM's
or EPA Protocol Gases to the needed level. The difference between
the actual concentration of the audit gas and the concentration
indicated by the monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the CEMS.
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
13. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
14. In Sec. 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) introductory text and
(g)(2)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test, CMS performance evaluation, or
CMS quality assurance test report (electronic or paper submitted copy).
Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality assurance requirement for a CMS,
or as otherwise approved by the Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through
(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(v) Where a test method, CEMS, PEMS, or COMS performance
specification, or on-going quality assurance requirement for a CEMS,
PEMS, or COMS requires you record or report, the following shall be
included in your report: Record of preparation of standards, record of
calibrations, raw data sheets for field sampling, raw data sheets for
field and laboratory analyses, chain-of-custody documentation, and
example calculations for reported results.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator shall furnish the Administrator
a copy of a written report of the results of the performance evaluation
containing the information specified in Sec. 63.7(g)(2)(i) through
(vi) simultaneously with the results of the performance test required
under Sec. 63.7 or within 60 days of completion of the performance
evaluation, unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard.
* * * * *
0
16. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63--Fuel Analysis Requirements
As stated in Sec. 63.7521, you must comply with the following
requirements
[[Page 56726]]
for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in Sec. 63.7575) may
be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conduct a fuel analysis for
the following pollutant . . . You must . . . Using . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Mercury.................... a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or EPA 1631 or
EPA 1631E or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for
solid), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 (for liquid
or solid), or ASTM
D4177\a\ (for
liquid), or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for
liquid), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), ASTM
D5198\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821-R-
01-013\a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), or ASTM
D5864\a\ for liquids
and other solids, or
ASTM D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\, ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or ASTM
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure ASTM D6722\a\ (for
mercury coal), EPA SW-846-
concentration in 7471B\a\ or EPA 1631
fuel sample. or EPA 1631E\a\ (for
solid samples), or
EPA SW-846-7470A\a\
or EPA SW-846-
7471B\a\ (for liquid
samples), or EPA 821-
R-01-013\a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentration Equation 8 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of
mercury per
MMBtu of heat
content.
2. HCl........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for coal
or biomass), ASTM
D4177\a\ (for liquid
fuels) or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), or ASTM
D5198\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), ASTM
D5864\a\, ASTM
D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\ or ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure EPA SW-846-9250\a\,
chlorine ASTM D6721\a\, ASTM
concentration in D4208\a\ (for coal),
fuel sample. or EPA SW-846-
5050\a\ or ASTM
E776\a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA SW-846-
9056\a\ or SW-846-
9076\a\ (for solids
or liquids) or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 7 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530 and convert
pounds of HCl from chlorine to HCl
per MMBtu of by multiplying by
heat content. 1.028.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification a. Measure Method 30B (M30B) at
for other gas 1 fuels. mercury 40 CFR part 60,
concentration in appendix A-8 of this
the fuel sample chapter or ASTM
and convert to D5954\a\, ASTM
units of D6350\a\, ISO 6978-
micrograms per 1:2003(E)\a\, or ISO
cubic meter, or. 6978-2:2003(E)\a\,
or EPA-1631\a\ or
equivalent.
b. Measure Method 29, 30A, or
mercury 30B (M29, M30A, or
concentration in M30B) at 40 CFR part
the exhaust gas 60, appendix A-8 of
when firing only this chapter or
the other gas 1 Method 101A or
fuel is fired in Method 102 at 40 CFR
the boiler or part 61, appendix B
process heater. of this chapter, or
ASTM Method D6784\a\
or equivalent.
4. TSM........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192\a\, or ASTM
D7430\a\, or ASTM
D6883\a\, or ASTM
D2234/D2234M\a\ (for
coal) or ASTM
D6323\a\ (for coal
or biomass), or ASTM
D4177\a\, (for
liquid fuels), or
ASTM D4057\a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B\a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M\a\
(for coal), ASTM
D5198\a\ or TAPPI
T266\a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050\a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865\a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM
fuel type. E711\a\ (for
biomass), or ASTM
D5864\a\ for liquids
and other solids, or
ASTM D240\a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173\a\ or ASTM
moisture content E871\a\, or
of the fuel type. D5864\a\, or ASTM
D240\a\, or ASTM
D95\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4177\a\ (for liquid
fuels) or ASTM
D4057\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure TSM ASTM D3683\a\, or
concentration in ASTM D4606\a\, or
fuel sample. ASTM D6357\a\ or EPA
200.8\a\ or EPA SW-
846-6020\a\, or EPA
SW-846-6020A\a\, or
EPA SW-846-6010C\a\,
EPA 7060\a\ or EPA
7060A\a\ (for
arsenic only), or
EPA SW-846-7740\a\
(for selenium only).
[[Page 56727]]
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 9 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of TSM
per MMBtu of
heat content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
0
17. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Performance Testing Requirements
As stated in Sec. 63.10007, you must comply with the following
requirements for performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed
affected sources: \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regarding emissions data collected during periods of startup
or shutdown, see Sec. Sec. 63.10020(b) and (c) and 63.10021(h).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
following activities, as
To conduct a performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- Using . . .\2\
the following pollutant . . . or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Filterable Particulate matter Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
(PM). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the filterable Methods 5 and 5I at
PM concentration. appendix A-3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure
fabric filters, Method
5D at appendix A-3 to
part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM
emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or
5I front half
temperature shall be
160[deg] 14
[deg]C (320[deg] 25 [deg]F).
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
PM CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Performance Specification
operate, and maintain the 11 at appendix B to part
PM CEMS. 60 of this chapter and
Procedure 2 at appendix
F to part 60 of this
chapter.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
2. Total or individual non-Hg HAP Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
metals. location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
[[Page 56728]]
e. Measure the HAP metals Method 29 at appendix A-8
emissions concentrations to part 60 of this
and determine each chapter. For liquid oil-
individual HAP metals fired units, Hg is
emissions concentration, included in HAP metals
as well as the total and you may use Method
filterable HAP metals 29, Method 30B at
emissions concentration appendix A-8 to part 60
and total HAP metals of this chapter; for
emissions concentration. Method 29, you must
report the front half
and back half results
separately. When using
Method 29, report metals
matrix spike and
recovery levels.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations methodology at appendix
(individual HAP metals, A-7 to part 60 of this
total filterable HAP chapter, or calculate
metals, and total HAP using mass emissions
metals) to lb/MMBtu or lb/ rate and gross output
MWh emissions rates. data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
hydrogen fluoride (HF). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HCl and HF Method 26 or Method 26A
emissions concentrations. at appendix A-8 to part
60 of this chapter or
Method 320 at appendix A
to part 63 of this
chapter or ASTM D6348-03
\3\ with
(1) the following
conditions when using
ASTM D6348-03:
(A) The test plan
preparation and
implementation in the
Annexes to ASTM D6348-
03, Sections A1 through
A8 are mandatory;
(B) For ASTM D6348-03
Annex A5 (Analyte
Spiking Technique), the
percent (%) R must be
determined for each
target analyte (see
Equation A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348-03
test data to be
acceptable for a target
analyte, %R must be 70%
>=R <=130%; and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each compound must be reported in the
test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated %R
value for that compound using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.072
and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
To conduct a performance test for following activities, as
the following pollutant . . . Using . . . (cont'd) applicable to your input- Using . . .\2\ (cont'd)
(cont'd) or output-based emission
limit . . . (cont'd)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) spiking levels
nominally no greater
than two times the level
corresponding to the
applicable emission
limit.
Method 26A must be used
if there are entrained
water droplets in the
exhaust stream.
[[Page 56729]]
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
HCl and/or HF CEMS... a. Install, certify, Appendix B of this
operate, and maintain the subpart.
HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
4. Mercury (Hg)................... Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter or Method 30B at
Appendix A-8 for Method
30B point selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.\3\
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter, ASTM D6784,\3\
or Method 29 at appendix
A-8 to part 60 of this
chapter; for Method 29,
you must report the
front half and back half
results separately.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/TBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/GWh emission rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
Hg CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of
operate, and maintain the appendix A of this
CEMS. subpart.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Section 6 of appendix A
emissions concentrations to this subpart.
to 30 boiler operating
day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
OR OR
Sorbent trap a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of
monitoring system. operate, and maintain the appendix A to this
sorbent trap monitoring subpart.
system.
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert emissions Section 6 of appendix A
concentrations to 30 to this subpart.
boiler operating day
rolling average lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR OR
LEE testing.......... a. Select sampling ports Single point located at
location and the number the 10% centroidal area
of traverse points. of the duct at a port
location per Method 1 at
appendix A-1 to part 60
of this chapter or
Method 30B at Appendix A-
8 for Method 30B point
selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G,
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter or flow
monitoring system
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981,\3\
or diluent gas
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
[[Page 56730]]
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter, or moisture
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter; perform a 30
operating day test, with
a maximum of 10
operating days per run
(i.e., per pair of
sorbent traps) or
sorbent trap monitoring
system or Hg CEMS
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations from the methodology at appendix
LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/ A-7 to part 60 of this
GWh emissions rates. chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
g. Convert average lb/TBtu Potential maximum annual
or lb/GWh Hg emission heat input in TBtu or
rate to lb/year, if you potential maximum
are attempting to meet electricity generated in
the 29.0 lb/year GWh.
threshold.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)........... SO2 CEMS............. a. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a)
CEMS. and (f).
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
18. In appendix A to Part 63:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample
volumes and/or sampling run times.
\3\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
0
b. Revise section 2.0 in Method 308.
0
c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in Method 308.
0
d. Revise sections 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method 308.
0
e. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in Method 308.
0
f. Revise sections 8.2.2.4 and 9.2.3 in Method 320.
0
g. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
0
h. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1. and section 8.2.3.2 in Method
325A.
0
i. Add sections 8.2.3.3 and 8.4.3 in Method 325A.
0
j. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5, and 12.2.2 in Method 325B.
0
k. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 in Method 325B.
0
l. Revise table 17.1 in Method 325B.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods
* * * * *
Method 303--Determination of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke
Oven Batteries
* * * * *
12.4 Average Duration of VE from Charging Operations. Use
Equation 303-3 to calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average of
seconds of visible emissions from the charging operation for each
battery using these current day's observations and the 29 previous
valid daily sets of observations.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.063
* * * * *
Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack.
The methanol is collected in deionized distilled water and adsorbed
on silica gel. The sample is returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated from other organic
compounds with a gas chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by a
flame ionization detector (FID). The fraction adsorbed on silica gel
is extracted with deionized distilled water and is then separated
and measured by GC/FID.
* * * * *
7.2.2 [Reserved]
* * * * *
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent Tube Samples. Prepare a
series of methanol standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml volumetric flask and
diluting the contents to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 [micro]g/ml of methanol.
Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this
[[Page 56731]]
standard, respectively, into three 50-ml volumetric flasks. Dilute
each solution to 50 ml with deionized distilled water. These
standards will have 1, 3, and 5 [micro]g/ml of methanol,
respectively. Transfer all four standards into 40-ml glass vials
capped with Teflon[supreg]-lined septa and store under
refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
* * * * *
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before and after the sampling run
is mandatory. The leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40-ml/min) rotameter
to the outlet of the DGM, and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm
(10 inch) Hg or the highest vacuum experienced during the sampling
run, and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage
rate in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is
acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off
the pump.
* * * * *
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures. The following
quality control measures are required:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality control
Section measure Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1.......... Sampling equipment Ensures accurate
leak check and measurement of
calibration. sample volume.
10.2........................ GC calibration...... Ensures precision of
GC analysis.
13.0........................ Methanol spike Verifies all
recovery check. methanol in stack
gas is being
captured in impinge/
adsorbent tube
setup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml of deionized distilled
water to each of the stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the impinger portion of
the sample train, [micro]g/ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, [micro]g/hr (lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with spiked train (mg).
mu = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with unspiked train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in the sample
train, [micro]g.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the
DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to
standard conditions, dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature, degrees K
([deg]R).
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293 degrees K (528
[deg]R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the DGM, dry cubic
meters (dcm), dry cubic feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the DGM, corrected
to standard conditions, dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry
standard cubic feet (dscf).
* * * * *
12.5 Recovery Fraction (R)
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.064
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.065
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a variety of compounds from
various sources, a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the range of 5 to 10
percent relative standard deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an experienced GC operator with a
reliable instrument can readily achieve 5 percent RSD. For this
method, the following combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Calibration standards must meet the requirements
in section 10.2.1 or 10.2.2 as applicable.
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
following spike recovery procedure at each sampling point where the
method is being applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical sampling trains.
Collocate the two sampling probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where the first probe tip is
2.5 cm from the outside edge of the other. One of the sampling
trains shall be designated the spiked train and the other the
unspiked train. Spike methanol into the impinger, and onto the
adsorbent tube in the spiked train prior to sampling. The total mass
of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent of the mass expected to be
collected with the unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the two
trains simultaneously. Analyze the impingers and adsorbents from the
two trains utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of spiked methanol recovered
(R) by combining the amount recovered in the impinger and in the
adsorbent tube, using the equations in section 12.5. Recovery values
must fall in the range: 0.70 <= R <= 1.30. Report the R value in the
test report.
ii. [Reserved]
* * * * *
Method 320--Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions
By Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
* * * * *
8.2.2.4 Determine the percent leak volume %VL for the
signal integration time tSS and for
[Delta]Pmax, i.e., the larger of [Delta]Pv or
[Delta]Pp, as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.066
[[Page 56732]]
Where:
50 = 100% divided by the leak-check time of 2 minutes.
* * * * *
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.067
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.068
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this value shall be >=10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the spike
standard measured by filling the FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples.
* * * * *
Method 323--Measurment of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method
* * * * *
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration Corrected to 15% Oxygen
* * * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.069
Method 325A--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
* * * * *
8.2.1.3 An extra sampler must be placed near known sources of
VOCs if potential emission sources are within 50 meters (162 feet)
of the boundary and the source or sources are located between two
monitors. Measure the distance (x) between the two monitors and
place another monitor approximately halfway between (x/2 10 percent) the two monitors. Only one extra sampler is
required between two monitors to account for known sources of VOCs.
For example, in Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional
monitors (i.e., light shaded sampler locations), and in Figure 8.2,
the facility added two additional monitors to provide sufficient
coverage of all area sources.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.070
[[Page 56733]]
Figure 8.1. Facility with a Regular Shape Between 750 and 1,500 Acres
in Area
* * * * *
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
greater than or equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling
locations are spaced 610 76 meters (2,000
250 feet) apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation,
permit or other requirement, for small disconnected subareas with
known sources within 50 meters (162 feet) of the monitoring
perimeter, sampling points need not be placed closer than 152 meters
(500 feet) apart as long as a minimum of 3 monitoring locations are
used for each subarea.
* * * * *
8.4.3 When extenuating circumstances do not permit safe
deployment or retrieval of passive samplers (e.g., extreme weather,
power failure), sampler placement or retrieval earlier or later than
the prescribed schedule is allowed but must occur as soon as safe
access to sampling sites is possible.
* * * * *
Method 325B--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Preparation and Analysis
* * * * *
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the monitoring site with
the sampling tubes and must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field blanks must be
installed under a protective hood/cover at the sampling location,
but the long-term storage caps must remain in place throughout the
monitoring period (see Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same container as the sampled
tubes. Collect at least two field blank samples per sampling period
to ensure sample integrity associated with shipment, collection, and
storage.
* * * * *
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a Sequence. Run CCV before each
sequence of analyses and after every tenth sample to ensure that the
previous multi-level calibration (see section 10.0) is still valid.
* * * * *
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal desorption--GC/MS analytical
method is changed or major equipment maintenance is performed, you
must conduct a new five-level calibration (see section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results from subsequent CCV are
within 30 percent of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in the supporting
information in the data report for each set of samples.
* * * * *
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent concentrations of compounds in
atmospheres as follows. Correct target compound concentrations
determined at the sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure
to standard conditions (25 [deg]C and 760 mm mercury) using Equation
12.5.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR14NO18.071
Where:
mmeas = The mass of the compound as measured in the sorbent
tube ([micro]g).
t = The exposure time (minutes).
tss = The average temperature during the collection period
at the sampling site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake rate (sampling
rate) (mL/min).
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (UNTP) for common VOCs,
using carbon sorbents packed into sorbent tubes of the dimensions
specified in section 6.1, are listed in Table 12.1. Adjust analytical
conditions to keep expected sampled masses within range (see sections
11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible method detection limits are
typically in the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and 0.05 ppb for
volatile aromatics such as benzene for 14-day monitoring. However,
actual detection limits will depend upon the analytical conditions
selected.
* * * * *
Table 17.1--Summary of GC/MS Analysis Quality Control Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Tune Daily \a\ prior to Evaluation criteria (1) Retune and or
Performance Check. sample analysis. presented in Section (2) Perform
9.5 and Table 9.2. Maintenance.
Five point calibration bracketing the Following any major (1) Percent Deviation (1) Repeat calibration
expected sample concentration. change, repair or (%DEV) of response sample analysis.
maintenance or if factors 30%. check.
meet method (2) Relative Retention (3) Prepare new
requirements. Times (RRTs) for calibration standards
Recalibration not to target peaks 0.06 units from repeat analysis.
mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second Following the The response factor (1) Repeat calibration
source calibration verification calibration curve. 30% DEV check.
check). from calibration curve (2) Repeat calibration
average response curve.
factor.
Laboratory Blank Analysis............ Daily \a\ following (1) <=0.2 ppbv per (1) Repeat analysis
bromofluoro benzene analyte or <=3 times with new blank tube.
and calibration check; the LOD, whichever is (2) Check system for
prior to sample greater. leaks, contamination.
analysis. (2) Internal Standard (3) Analyze additional
(IS) area response blank.
40% and IS
Retention Time (RT)
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration check.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification..... One tube analyzed for <0.2 ppbv per VOC Re-clean all tubes in
each batch of tubes targeted compound or 3 batch and reanalyze.
cleaned or 10 percent times the LOD,
of tubes whichever is whichever is greater.
greater.
Samples--Internal Standards.......... All samples............ IS area response 40% and IS RT invalidation.
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration validation.
[[Page 56734]]
Field Blanks......................... Two per sampling period No greater than one- Flag Data for possible
third of the measured invalidation due to
target analyte or high blank bias.
compliance limit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Every 24 hours.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-24747 Filed 11-13-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P