[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47071-47073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20093]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 2
[Docket ID: NPS-2018-0003; NPS-WASO-25595; PPWOVPADU0/PPMPRLE1Y.Y00000]
RIN 1024-AE44
Transporting Bows and Crossbows Across National Park System Units
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service allows individuals to carry or
possess an unloaded bow or crossbow within the National Park System
when accessing otherwise inaccessible lands or waters contiguous to a
park area when other means of access are otherwise impracticable or
impossible.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 18, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The comments received on the proposed rule and an economic
analysis are available on www.regulations.gov in Docket ID: NPS-2018-
0003.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jay Calhoun, NPS Regulations Program,
1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240. Phone: (202) 513-7112. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
National Park Service (NPS) regulations at 36 CFR 2.4(b)(3) allow
bows and crossbows that are not ready for immediate use to be possessed
by individuals in NPS-administered areas within a mechanical mode of
conveyance. This provides regulatory relief for transient individuals
passing through park areas in vehicles and other forms of mechanical
transport. This rule extends this relief to individuals transporting
unloaded bows and crossbows on foot or horseback when accessing
otherwise inaccessible lands or waters contiguous to a park area when
other means of access are otherwise impracticable or impossible.
Possessing bows and crossbows in this manner is subject to applicable
state laws and is not allowed if the individual is otherwise prohibited
by law from possessing a bow or crossbow.
This rule recognizes and addresses the difficulties faced by some
individuals attempting to access private property or other lands and
waters adjacent to NPS-administered areas. In some cases, the use of
mechanical transport to access these adjacent lands and waters is
impracticable. As a result, individuals must traverse NPS areas on foot
or horseback to reach these lands and waters but under existing
regulations cannot do so with bows and crossbows without first
obtaining a permit from the park Superintendent. This rule removes the
permit requirement in order to carry or possess bows or crossbows for
this purpose. This rule does not change the regulations in 36 CFR part
2 governing the use of a bow or crossbow in park areas.
Summary of and Responses to Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
The NPS published the proposed rule on March 2, 2018 (83 FR 8959),
with request for public comment through the Federal eRulemaking portal
at www.regulations.gov, or by mail or hand delivery. The 60-day comment
period ended on May 1, 2018. The NPS received 40 comments, 34 of which
supported the proposed rule and did not request any changes. Other
comments were not in favor of the proposed rule or were in favor but
suggested changes. A summary of these comments and NPS responses is
provided below. After taking the public comments into consideration,
the NPS has not made any changes in the final rule.
1. Comment. Several commenters expressed concern that the rule will
cause individuals to use bows and crossbows illegally, either within
the National Park System or on adjacent lands where hunting is not
allowed. These commenters are concerned that this illegal activity will
adversely impact threatened or endangered wildlife.
NPS Response: This rule does not change NPS regulations governing
the use of weapons, including bows and crossbows, within the National
Park System. Illegal hunting will remain illegal in the same manner
that it was before this rule. Unfortunately illegal hunting and
trapping does occur. NPS law enforcement staff work alone and with
state and local partners to identify illegal activity and prosecute
offenders according to the law. The NPS does not believe that
individuals who are willing to hunt and trap illegally will be
emboldened by this rule. These individuals are unlikely to have
requested a permit from the NPS prior to bringing bows and crossbows
into NPS areas in order to hunt or trap illegally. Existing NPS
regulations allow individuals to travel through NPS lands with bows and
crossbows in a motor vehicle. The NPS does not believe that a person
who is willing to engage in illegal hunting would be deterred from
doing so by existing regulation, which requires motorized transport of
his or her bow or crossbow, especially when NPS regulations allow
individuals to carry firearms within the National Park System outside
of a motor vehicle without needing to obtain a permit.
2. Comment. Several commenters were concerned that this rule would
result in individuals leaving bows, crossbows, and related equipment,
such as arrows and quivers, behind on NPS lands.
[[Page 47072]]
NPS Response: The NPS has no reason to believe that individuals
would intentionally leave this type of equipment behind in NPS areas.
NPS regulations at 36 CFR 2.22 prohibit abandoning property.
3. Comment. One commenter supported removing the permit
requirement, but suggested that the NPS also remove the requirement
that an individual must be accessing otherwise ``inaccessible'' lands
or waters. This commenter also suggested that the NPS change the
requirement that ``other means of access are otherwise impracticable or
impossible'' to ``impracticable or less convenient.''
NPS Response: The language limiting possession to situations when
individuals are ``accessing otherwise inaccessible lands or waters
contiguous to a park area when other means of access are otherwise
impracticable or impossible'' has been part of NPS regulations
concerning permits to carry weapons since 1983 (48 FR 30282, June 30,
1983). This language helps ensure that individuals transport bows and
crossbows through NPS lands for legitimate purposes, such as accessing
private property or other public lands that cannot be accessed another
way--either through the National Park System in a motor vehicle or
through a non-NPS area.
Compliance With Other Laws, Executive Orders and Department Policy
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. The NPS has developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (Executive Order
13771)
This rule is an E.O. 13771 deregulatory action because it imposes
less than zero costs by removing a regulatory permit requirement that
imposes unnecessary costs upon individuals seeking to safely access
remote lands and waters. The costs associated with the requirement to
obtain a permit before transporting a bow or crossbow across NPS lands
or waters outside of a mechanical conveyance are eliminated.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). This certification is based on information
contained in the economic analyses found in the report entitled
``Benefit-Cost and Regulatory Flexibility Analyses: Cost-Benefit and
Regulatory Flexibility Analyses: Transporting Bows and Crossbows Across
National Park System Units'' that is available to the public on
regulations.gov in Docket ID: NPS-2018-0003.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. It addresses public
use of national park lands, and imposes no requirements on other
agencies or governments. A statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act is not required.
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
This rule does not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have takings implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, the rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism summary impact statement. This rule only
affects use of federally-administered lands and waters. It has no
outside effects on other areas. A Federalism summary impact statement
is not required.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
This rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department
Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal sovereignty. The NPS has evaluated
this rule under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the
Department's tribal consultation policy and has determined that tribal
consultation is not required because the rule will have no substantial
direct effect on federally recognized Indian tribes.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act is not required. The NPS may not conduct or sponsor and
you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A
[[Page 47073]]
detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because the NPS intends to categorically exclude
this rule under 516 DM 12.5(A)(10). This rule modifies existing NPS
regulations in a manner that does not increase public use or introduce
non-compatible uses to the extent of compromising the nature and
character of the National Park System or causing physical damage to it.
The rule does not conflict with adjacent ownerships or lands uses, or
cause a nuisance to adjacent owners or occupants. We have also
determined that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under NEPA.
Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects in not
required.
List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 2
National parks, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service amends
36 CFR part 2 as set forth below:
PART 2--RESOURCE PROTECTION, PUBLIC USE AND RECREATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102.
0
2. Amend Sec. 2.4 as follows:
0
a. Redesignate paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(3)(i).
0
b. Add a new paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
0
c. Revise paragraph (e) introductory text.
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 2.4 Weapons, traps and nets.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) An individual may carry or possess an unloaded bow or crossbow
when accessing otherwise inaccessible lands or waters contiguous to a
park area when other means of access are otherwise impracticable or
impossible if:
(A) The individual is not otherwise prohibited by law from
possessing the bow or crossbow; and
(B) The possession of the bow or crossbow is in compliance with the
law of the State in which the park area is located.
* * * * *
(e) The superintendent may issue a permit to carry or possess a
weapon that is not otherwise authorized, a trap, or a net under the
following circumstances:
* * * * *
Andrea Travnicek,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Water and Science, Exercising the
Authority of the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2018-20093 Filed 9-17-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-EJ-P