[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23680-23681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[WTB Docket No. 18-133; DA 18-454]


Metro Two-Way, LLC; Notice of Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document commences a hearing to determine whether Metro 
Two-Way, LLC (Metro) is qualified to be and to remain a Federal 
Communications Commission (Commission) licensee, and as a consequence 
thereof, whether any or all of its licenses should be revoked, and 
whether its pending application should be denied. As discussed more 
fully below, based on the totality of the evidence, there are 
substantial and material questions of fact as to whether Metro 
repeatedly made misrepresentations to and lacked candor with the 
Commission in its submission of several applications in connection with 
various Wireless Radio Service authorizations.

DATES: Each party to the proceeding (except for the Chief, Enforcement 
Bureau), in person or by counsel, shall file with the Commission, by 
May 23, 2018, a written appearance stating that the party will appear 
on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues 
specified herein.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Kane, Special Counsel, 
Enforcement Bureau, (202) 418-2393.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Order 
to Show Cause, Hearing Designation Order and Notice of Opportunity for 
Hearing (Order) in WTB Docket No. 18-133, DA 18-454, adopted on May 2, 
2018, and released on May 3, 2018. The full text of the Order is 
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours in 
the FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Portals II, 
Washington, DC 20554. This document is available in alternative formats 
(computer diskette, large print, audio record, and Braille). Persons 
with disabilities who need documents in these formats may contact the 
FCC by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-
0432.

Synopsis

    1. In this Order, the Commission commences a hearing proceeding 
before a Commission Administrative Law Judge to determine whether the 
pending application of Metro Two-Way, LLC should be granted, and 
whether Metro's licenses should be revoked. Metro represented to the 
Commission in five license applications that no party directly or 
indirectly controlling Metro has ever been convicted of a felony by any 
state or federal court. The information before us indicates that Hector 
Manuel Mosquera, a party directly or indirectly controlling Metro, was 
convicted of a felony by a state court in California.
    2. Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to sections 309(e), 
312(a)(1), 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4), and 312(c) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 
309(e), 312(a)(1), 312(a)(2), 312(a)(4), 312(c), that Metro Two-Way, 
LLC shall show cause why the authorizations for which it is the 
licensee set forth in Attachment A should not be revoked, and that the

[[Page 23681]]

above-captioned application filed by Metro Two-Way, LLC is designated 
for a hearing in a consolidated proceeding before an FCC Administrative 
Law Judge, at a time and place to be specified in a subsequent Order, 
upon the following issues:
    (a) To determine whether Hector Manuel Mosquera directly or 
indirectly controls Metro.
    (b) To determine whether Metro engaged in misrepresentation and/or 
lack of candor in its applications with the Commission.
    (c) To determine whether Metro failed to amend its pending 
application, in willful and/or repeated violation of section 1.65 of 
the Commission's rules.
    (d) To determine, in light of the evidence adduced pursuant to the 
foregoing issues, whether Metro is qualified to be and remain a 
Commission licensee.
    (e) To determine, in light of the foregoing issues, whether the 
authorizations for which Metro is the licensee should be revoked.
    (f) To determine, in light of the foregoing issues, whether the 
captioned application filed by or on behalf of Metro should be granted.
    3. It is further ordered that, in addition to the resolution of the 
foregoing issues, it shall be determined, pursuant to section 503(b)(1) 
of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 503(b)(1), whether an order of forfeiture should 
be issued against Metro in an amount not to exceed the statutory limit 
for the willful and/or repeated violation of each rule section above 
for which the statute of limitations in section 503(b)(6) of the Act, 
47 U.S.C. 503(b)(6), has not lapsed.
    4. It is further ordered that, pursuant to section 312(c) of the 
Act and sections 1.91(c) and 1.221 of the rules, 47 U.S.C. 312(c) and 
47 CFR 1.91(c), 1.221, to avail itself of the opportunity to be heard 
and to present evidence at a hearing in this proceeding, Metro, in 
person or by an attorney, shall file with the Commission, within 20 
calendar days of the release of this Order, a written appearance 
stating that it will appear at the hearing and present evidence on the 
issues specified above.
    5. It is further ordered that, pursuant to section 1.91 of the 
rules, 47 CFR 1.91, if Metro fails to file a timely appearance, its 
right to a hearing shall be deemed to be waived. In the event the right 
to a hearing is waived, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (or 
presiding officer if one has been designated) shall, at the earliest 
practicable date, issue an order reciting the events or circumstances 
constituting a waiver of hearing, terminating the hearing proceeding, 
and certifying the case to the Commission. In addition, pursuant to 
section 1.221 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.221, if any applicant 
to the captioned application fails to file a timely written appearance, 
the captioned application shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure 
to prosecute.
    6. It is further ordered that the Chief, Enforcement Bureau, shall 
be made a party to this proceeding without the need to file a written 
appearance.
    7. It is further ordered that pursuant to section 312(d) of the 
Act, 47 U.S.C. 312(d), and section 1.91(d) of the Commission's rules, 
47 CFR 1.91(d), the burden of proceeding with the introduction of 
evidence and the burden of proof shall be upon the Enforcement Bureau 
as to the issues at 15(a)-(e), above, and that, pursuant to section 
309(e) of the Act, 47 U.S.C. 309(e), and section 1.254 of the 
Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.254, the burden of proceeding with the 
introduction of evidence and the burden of proof shall be upon Metro as 
to the issue at 15(f), above.
    8. It is further ordered that Mobile Relay Associates shall be made 
a party to this hearing in its capacity as a petitioner to the 
captioned application.
    9. It is further ordered that a copy of this document, or a summary 
thereof, shall be published in the Federal Register.

Federal Communications Commission.
Scot Stone,
Deputy Chief, Mobility Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-10925 Filed 5-21-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6712-01-P