[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 73 (Monday, April 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16322-16326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-058]


Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel 
From the People's Republic of China: Affirmative Final Determination of 
Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value and Final Determination of Critical 
Circumstances, in Part

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that imports 
of certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel 
(cold-drawn mechanical tubing) from the People's Republic of China 
(China) are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at 
less than fair value (LTFV) during the period of investigation (POI) of 
October 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017.

DATES: Effective April 16, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Stolz or Keith Haynes, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4474 or (202) 482-5139, 
respectively.

Background

    On November 22, 2017, Commerce published its Preliminary 
Determination.\1\ On January 3, 2018, Commerce published an Amended 
Preliminary Determination.\2\ In the Preliminary Determination, 
Commerce extended the due date of the final LTFV determination until 
April 6, 2018.\3\ Additionally, in the Preliminary Determination, 
Commerce invited comments from interested parties.\4\ For a complete 
description of the events that followed the Preliminary Determination, 
including a list of the parties that filed case and rebuttal briefs and 
a summary of the arguments received, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\5\ On January 23, 2018, Commerce exercised its discretion 
to toll deadlines affected by the closure of the Federal Government 
from January 20 through 22, 2018.\6\ The revised deadline for the final 
determination of this investigation is now April 9, 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy 
Steel from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative 
Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value and Preliminary 
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, and 
Postponement of Final Determination, 82 FR 55574 (November 22, 2017) 
(Preliminary Determination).
    \2\ See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy 
Steel from the People's Republic of China: Amended Preliminary 
Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less-Than-Fair Value, 83 FR 
352 (January 3, 2018) (Amended Preliminary Determination).
    \3\ See Preliminary Determination at 55576.
    \4\ Id. at 55576-77.
    \5\ See memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Determination of the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain 
Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from the 
People's Republic of China,'' dated concurrently with this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
    \6\ See memorandum, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the 
Federal Government,'' dated January 23, 2018. (Extending deadlines 
in this segment of the proceeding by 3 days).
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    The period of investigation is October 1, 2016, through March 31, 
2017. This period corresponds to the two most recent fiscal quarters 
prior to the month of the filing of the petition, which was April 
2017.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope Comments

    We invited parties to comment on Commerce's Preliminary Scope 
Memorandum.\9\ Commerce has reviewed the briefs submitted by interested 
parties, considered the arguments therein, and has made changes to the 
scope of the investigation. For further discussion, see Commerce's 
Final Scope Decision Memorandum.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See memorandum, ``Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of 
Carbon and Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany, India, 
Italy, the Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and 
Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary 
Determinations,'' dated November 15, 2017 (Preliminary Scope 
Memorandum).
    \10\ See memorandum, ``Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of 
Carbon and Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany, India, 
Italy, the Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and 
Switzerland: Scope Comments Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Determinations,'' dated December 4, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is mechanical tubing from 
China. For a complete description of the scope of this investigation, 
see Appendix I.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by 
interested parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that 
parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum, follows at Appendix II to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document, and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all 
parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic copy of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.

Verification

    As provided in section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act), in January 2018, Commerce conducted verification of the 
information submitted by Zhangjiagang Huacheng Import & Export Co., 
Ltd. (Huacheng) in its questionnaire responses.\11\ We issued our 
verification report on February 28, 2018.\12\ Commerce used standard

[[Page 16323]]

verification procedures, including examination of relevant accounting 
and production records and original source documents provided by the 
respondent.\13\ Due to circumstances discussed at length in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum, Commerce declined to verify the questionnaire 
responses of the other mandatory respondent, Hongyi Steel Pipe Co., 
Ltd. (Hongyi) \14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See memorandum, ``Verification of the Questionnaire 
Responses of Zhangjiagang Huacheng Import & Export Co. Ltd., in the 
Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical 
Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from the People's Republic of 
China,'' dated March (Huacheng Verification Report).
    \12\ Id.
    \13\ Id.
    \14\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Determination

    Based on our analysis of the comments received and our findings at 
verification, we have made certain changes to the calculation of the 
antidumping duty margin applicable to Huacheng. For a discussion of 
these changes, see the ``Changes Since the Preliminary Determination'' 
section of the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id. at Comment 7 for a discussion of Commerce's 
determination to apply certain changes to Huacheng's weighted-
average margin calculation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hongyi's Separate Rate Status

    Sections 776(a)(1) and (2) of the Act provide that if certain 
necessary information is not on the record or an interested party has 
withheld information that was requested or provided information that 
cannot be verified, Commerce may apply ``facts otherwise available.'' 
For this final determination, Commerce has determined that Hongyi did 
not act to the best of its ability in providing Commerce with requested 
information that could be verified. Thus, as Commerce is unable to rely 
on Hongyi's separate rate information, we are treating Hongyi as part 
of the China-wide entity for purposes of this final determination. For 
Commerce's analysis, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 
1.

Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part

    In accordance with section 733(e)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.206, 
we preliminarily found that critical circumstances exist with respect 
to imports of cold-drawn mechanical tubing from the China-wide Entity, 
and the non-selected separate rate respondents, but do not exist with 
respect to Huacheng.\16\ Commerce received no comments regarding this 
issue after the Preliminary Determination regarding Huacheng, and all 
other Chinese exporters. However, Commerce did receive comments from 
Hongyi opposing the application of critical circumstances to it for the 
final determination.\17\ For Commerce's analysis, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum at Comments 1 and 2. Therefore, for the final 
determination, we continue to find that, in accordance with section 
735(a)(3) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.206, critical circumstances exist 
with respect to subject merchandise produced or exported by the China-
wide Entity, and the non-selected separate rate respondents, but do not 
exist with respect to Huacheng.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum, at 14-16.
    \17\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Entity

    For the reasons explained in the Preliminary Determination, we are 
continuing to find that the use of adverse facts available (AFA), 
pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act, is appropriate and are 
applying a rate based entirely on AFA to the China-wide entity. 
Commerce did not receive timely responses to its quantity and value 
(Q&V) questionnaire, separate rate applications, or separate rate 
supplemental questionnaires from certain exporters and/or producers of 
subject merchandise that were named in the petition and to which 
Commerce issued Q&V questionnaires.\18\ As these non-responsive China 
companies did not demonstrate that they are eligible for separate rate 
status, Commerce continues to consider them to be a part of the China-
wide entity. Consequently, we continue to find that the China-wide 
entity withheld requested information, significantly impeded the 
proceeding, and failed to cooperate to the best of their abilities, and 
thus we are continuing to base the China-wide entity's rate on AFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Separate Rate 
Section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

China-Wide Rate

    In selecting the AFA rate for the China-wide entity, Commerce's 
practice is to select a rate that is sufficiently adverse to ensure 
that the uncooperative party does not obtain a more favorable result by 
failing to cooperate than if it had fully cooperated.\19\ Specifically, 
it is Commerce's practice to select, as an AFA rate, the higher of: (a) 
The highest dumping margin alleged in the petition; or, (b) the highest 
calculated dumping margin of any respondent in the investigation.\20\ 
As AFA, Commerce has assigned to the China-wide entity the rate of 
186.89 percent, which is the highest dumping margin alleged in the 
petition.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See, e.g., Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination: 
Purified Carboxymethyl cellulose from Finland, 69 FR 77216 (December 
27, 2004), unchanged in Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value: Purified Carboxymethyl cellulose from Finland, 
70 FR 28279 (May 17, 2005).
    \20\ See, e.g., Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents 
from the People's Republic of China: Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value, 77 FR 17436, 17438 (March 26, 2012); Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cold-Rolled 
Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Products from the People's Republic 
of China, 65 FR 34660 (May 31, 2000), and accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
    \21\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at Adverse Facts 
Available Section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Separate Rate

    Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others rate is 
normally an amount equal to the weighted average of the estimated 
weighted average dumping margins established for exporters and 
producers individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis 
margins, and any margins determined entirely based on facts available. 
Accordingly, when only one weighted-average dumping margin for an 
individually investigated respondent is above de minimis and not based 
entirely on facts available, the separate rate will be equal to that 
single, above de minimis rate.
    In this final determination, Commerce has calculated a rate for 
Huacheng that is not zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts 
available. With respect to the other mandatory respondent, Hongyi, 
Commerce has found Hongyi ineligible for separate status. Therefore, 
Commerce has assigned to the companies that it has not individually 
examined but have demonstrated their eligibility for a separate rate a 
margin of 44.92 percent, which is the rate calculated for Huacheng.

Combination Rates

    In the Initiation Notice, Commerce stated that it would calculate 
combination rates for the respondents that are eligible for a separate 
rate in this investigation.\22\ Accordingly, we have assigned 
combination rates to Huacheng, along with all other companies receiving 
a separate rate.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and 
Alloy Steel from the Federal Republic of Germany, India, Italy, the 
Republic of Korea, the People's Republic of China, and Switzerland: 
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 82 FR 22491 (May 
16, 2017) (Initiation Notice).
    \23\ See Enforcement and Compliance Policy Bulletin No. 05.1 
``Separate-Rates Practice and Application of Combination Rates in 
Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market Economy Countries,'' 
(April 5, 2005) (Policy Bulletin 05.1), available on Commerce's 
website at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05-1.pdf.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 16324]]

Final Determination of the Investigation

    We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins 
exist for the period October 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                   Cash deposit
                                                                                     Weighted      adjusted for
                   Producer                                 Exporter              average margin  subsidy offset
                                                                                     (percent)       (percent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jiangsu Huacheng Industry Pipe Making           Zhangjiagang Huacheng Import &             44.92           44.90
 Corporation, and Zhangjiagang Salem Fine        Export Co., Ltd..
 Tubing Co., Ltd..
Anji Pengda Steel Pipe Co., Ltd...............  Anji Pengda Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.           44.92           44.90
Changshu Fushilai Steel Pipe Co., Ltd.........  Changshu Fushilai Steel Pipe               44.92           44.90
                                                 Co., Ltd..
Changshu Special Shaped Steel Tube Co., Ltd...  Changshu Special Shaped Steel              44.92           44.90
                                                 Tube Co., Ltd..
Jiangsu Liwan Precision Tube Manufacturing      Suzhou Foster International Co.,           44.92           44.90
 Co., Ltd..                                      Ltd..
Zhangjiagang Precision Tube Manufacturing Co.,  Suzhou Foster International Co.,           44.92           44.90
 Ltd. (Zhangjiangang Tube).                      Ltd..
Wuxi Dajin High-Precision Cold-Drawn Steel      Wuxi Huijin International Trade            44.92           44.90
 Tube Co., Ltd..                                 Co., Ltd..
Zhangjiagang Shengdingyuan Pipe-Making Co.,     Zhangjiagang Shengdingyuan Pipe-           44.92           44.90
 Ltd..                                           Making Co., Ltd..
Zhejiang Minghe Steel Pipe Co., Ltd...........  Zhejiang Minghe Steel Pipe Co.,            44.92           44.90
                                                 Ltd..
Zhejiang Dingxin Steel Tube Manufacturing Co.,  Zhejiang Dingxin Steel Tube                44.92           44.90
 Ltd.                                            Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
China-Wide Entity \24\........................  ................................          186.89          186.89
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Commerce notes that Hongyi is a part of the China-wide 
entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to disclose to parties the calculations performed in this 
proceeding within five days of any public announcement of this notice 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224 (b).

Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation

    In accordance with section 735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will 
instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue to 
suspend liquidation of all entries of cold-drawn mechanical tubing from 
the China, as described in the ``Scope of the Investigation'' section, 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after 
November 22, 2017, the date of publication of the Preliminary 
Determination notice in the Federal Register.
    Pursuant to section 735(c)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act, Commerce will 
instruct CBP to require a cash deposit \25\ equal to the weighted-
average amount by which NV exceeds U.S. price as follows: (1) The cash 
deposit rate for the exporter/producer combination listed in the table 
above will be the rate identified for that combination in the table; 
(2) for all combinations of exporters/producers of merchandise under 
consideration that have not received their own separate rate above, the 
cash-deposit rate will be the cash deposit rate established for the 
China-wide entity; and (3) for all non-China exporters of the 
merchandise under consideration which have not received their own 
separate rate above, the cash-deposit rate will be the cash deposit 
rate applicable to the China exporter/producer combination that 
supplied that non-China exporter. These suspension of liquidation 
instructions will remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Modification of Regulations Regarding the Practice of 
Accepting Bonds During the Provisional Measures Period in 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations, 76 FR 61042 
(October 3, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We normally adjust antidumping duty cash deposit rates by the 
amount of export subsidies, where appropriate. In the companion CVD 
investigation, with respect to Huacheng, a mandatory respondent in this 
investigation not individually examined in the CVD investigation, and 
the separate-rate companies, we find that an export subsidy warrants an 
adjustment of 0.02 percent to the cash deposit rate because this is the 
export subsidy rate included in the countervailing duty ``all others'' 
rate to which the separate-rate companies are subject. As part of our 
determination in this final determination to apply adverse facts 
available to the China-wide entity, Commerce has not adjusted the 
China-wide entity's AD cash deposit rate by the lowest export subsidy 
rate determined for any party in the companion CVD proceeding, because 
the lowest export subsidy rate determined in the companion CVD 
proceeding is 0.00 percent.\26\ \27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See, e.g., Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires 
from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of 
Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Preliminary Affirmative Determination 
of Critical Circumstances; In Part and Postponement of Final 
Determination, 80 FR 4250 (January 27, 2015), and accompanying 
Issues and Decision Memorandum at 35.
    \27\ See Countervailing Duty Investigation of Cold-Drawn 
Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from the People's 
Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination, and Final 
Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 82 FR 
58175 (December 11, 2017) (Cold-Drawn Mechanical CVD Final) and 
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, we normally adjust cash 
deposit rates for estimated domestic subsidy pass-through, where 
appropriate. However, in this case there is no basis to grant a 
domestic subsidy pass-through adjustment.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

International Trade Commission Notification

    In accordance with section 735(d) of the Act, we notified the 
International Trade Commission (ITC) of the final affirmative 
determination of sales at LTFV. As Commerce's final determination is 
affirmative, in accordance with section 735(b)(2) of the Act, the ITC 
will determine, within 45 days, whether the domestic industry in the 
United States is materially injured, or threatened with material 
injury, by reason of imports of cold-drawn mechanical tubing for sale 
from the

[[Page 16325]]

China, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation, of cold-
drawn mechanical tubing from the China. If the ITC determines that such 
injury does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all 
securities posted will be refunded or canceled. If the ITC determines 
that such injury does exist, China will issue an antidumping duty order 
directing CBP to assess, upon further instruction by Commerce, 
antidumping duties on all imports of the subject merchandise entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the effective 
date of the suspension of liquidation.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to the parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of propriety information disclosed under APO 
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of 
return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Return or Destruction of Proprietary Information

    In the event the ITC issues a final negative injury determination, 
this notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to an APO of 
their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary 
information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this determination and notice in 
accordance with sections 735(d) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
352.210(c).

    Dated: April 9, 2018.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix I

Scope of the Investigation

    The scope of this investigation covers cold-drawn mechanical 
tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) of 
circular cross-section, 304.8 mm or more in length, in actual 
outside diameters less than 331mm, and regardless of wall thickness, 
surface finish, end finish or industry specification. The subject 
cold-drawn mechanical tubing is a tubular product with a circular 
cross-sectional shape that has been cold-drawn or otherwise cold-
finished after the initial tube formation in a manner that involves 
a change in the diameter or wall thickness of the tubing, or both. 
The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing may be produced from either 
welded (e.g., electric resistance welded, continuous welded, etc.) 
or seamless (e.g., pierced, pilgered or extruded, etc.) carbon or 
alloy steel tubular products. It may also be heat treated after cold 
working. Such heat treatments may include, but are not limited to, 
annealing, normalizing, quenching and tempering, stress relieving or 
finish annealing. Typical cold-drawing methods for subject 
merchandise include, but are not limited to, drawing over mandrel, 
rod drawing, plug drawing, sink drawing and similar processes that 
involve reducing the outside diameter of the tubing with a die or 
similar device, whether or not controlling the inside diameter of 
the tubing with an internal support device such as a mandrel, rod, 
plug or similar device. Other cold-finishing operations that may be 
used to produce subject merchandise include cold-rolling and cold-
sizing the tubing.
    Subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing is typically certified to 
meet industry specifications for cold-drawn tubing including but not 
limited to:
    (1) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or 
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) specifications ASTM 
A-512, ASTM A-513 Type 3 (ASME SA513 Type 3), ASTM A-513 Type 4 
(ASME SA513 Type 4), ASTM A-513 Type 5 (ASME SA513 Type 5), ASTM A-
513 Type 6 (ASME SA513 Type 6), ASTM A-519 (cold-finished);
    (2) SAE International (Society of Automotive Engineers) 
specifications SAE J524, SAE J525, SAE J2833, SAE J2614, SAE J2467, 
SAE J2435, SAE J2613;
    (3) Aerospace Material Specification (AMS) AMS T-6736 (AMS 
6736), AMS 6371, AMS 5050, AMS 5075, AMS 5062, AMS 6360, AMS 6361, 
AMS 6362, AMS 6371, AMS 6372, AMS 6374, AMS 6381, AMS 6415;
    (4) United States Military Standards (MIL) MIL-T-5066 and MIL-T-
6736;
    (5) foreign standards equivalent to one of the previously listed 
ASTM, ASME, SAE, AMS or MIL specifications including but not limited 
to:
    (a) German Institute for Standardization (DIN) specifications 
DIN 2391-2, DIN 2393-2, DIN 2394-2);
    (b) European Standards (EN) EN 10305-1, EN 10305-2, EN 10305-4, 
EN 10305-6 and European national variations on those standards 
(e.g., British Standard (BS EN), Irish Standard (IS EN) and German 
Standard (DIN EN) variations, etc.);
    (c) Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS) JIS G 3441 and JIS G 
3445; and
    (6) proprietary standards that are based on one of the above-
listed standards.
    The subject cold-drawn mechanical tubing may also be dual or 
multiple certified to more than one standard. Pipe that is multiple 
certified as cold-drawn mechanical tubing and to other 
specifications not covered by this scope, is also covered by the 
scope of this investigation when it meets the physical description 
set forth above.
    Steel products included in the scope of this investigation are 
products in which: (1) Iron predominates, by weight, over each of 
the other contained elements; and (2) the carbon content is 2 
percent or less by weight.
    For purposes of this scope, the place of cold-drawing determines 
the country of origin of the subject merchandise. Subject 
merchandise that is subject to minor working in a third country that 
occurs after drawing in one of the subject countries including, but 
not limited to, heat treatment, cutting to length, straightening, 
nondestructive testing, deburring or chamfering, remains within the 
scope of this investigation.
    All products that meet the written physical description are 
within the scope of this investigation unless specifically excluded 
or covered by the scope of an existing order. Merchandise that meets 
the physical description of cold-drawn mechanical tubing above is 
within the scope of the investigation even if it is also dual or 
multiple certified to an otherwise excluded specification listed 
below. The following products are outside of, and/or specifically 
excluded from, the scope of this investigation:
    (1) Cold-drawn stainless steel tubing, containing 10.5 percent 
or more of chromium by weight and not more than 1.2 percent of 
carbon by weight;
    (2) products certified to one or more of the ASTM, ASME or 
American Petroleum Institute (API) specifications listed below:
     ASTM A-53;
     ASTM A-106;
     ASTM A-179 (ASME SA 179);
     ASTM A-192 (ASME SA 192);
     ASTM A-209 (ASME SA 209);
     ASTM A-210 (ASME SA 210);
     ASTM A-213 (ASME SA 213);
     ASTM A-334 (ASME SA 334);
     ASTM A-423 (ASME SA 423);
     ASTM A-498;
     ASTM A-496 (ASME SA 496);
     ASTM A-199;
     ASTM A-500;
     ASTM A-556;
     ASTM A-565;
     API 5L; and
     API 5CT

except that any cold-drawn tubing product certified to one of the 
above excluded specifications will not be excluded from the scope if 
it is also dual- or multiple-certified to any other specification 
that otherwise would fall within the scope of this investigation.
    The products subject to the investigation are currently 
classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(HTSUS) under item numbers: 7304.31.3000, 7304.31.6050, 
7304.51.1000, 7304.51.5005, 7304.51.5060, 7306.30.5015, 
7306.30.5020, 7306.50.5030. Subject merchandise may also enter under 
numbers 7306.30.1000 and 7306.50.1000. The HTSUS subheadings above 
are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written 
description of the scope of the investigation is dispositive.

[[Page 16326]]

Appendix II

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Cancellation of Verification and Application of AFA 
Based on Unreliable Accounting Records for Hongyi
    Comment 2: Hongyi's Reporting of Steel Grade
    Comment 3: Rejection of Factual Information in Hongyi's 
Submissions
    Comment 4: Critical Circumstances
    Comment 5: Surrogate Country Selection
    Comment 6: Romanian Financial Statements Used in the Calculation 
of Surrogate Financial Ratios
    Comment 7: Surrogate Used to Value Huacheng's Seamless Tube 
Inputs
    Comment 8: Whether to Adjust U.S. Price for Market Economy Ocean 
Freight Expense
    Comment 9: Other Issues
5. Conclusion

[FR Doc. 2018-07849 Filed 4-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P