[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57659-57664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26410]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0009; T.D. TTB-149; Re: Notice No. 163]
RIN 1513-AC34
Establishment of the Petaluma Gap Viticultural Area and
Modification of the North Coast Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the approximately 202,476-acre ``Petaluma Gap'' viticultural area in
portions of Sonoma and Marin Counties in California. The viticultural
area lies entirely within the larger existing North Coast viticultural
area and partially within the established Sonoma Coast viticultural
area. TTB also modifies the boundary of the North Coast viticultural
area to eliminate a partial overlap with the Petaluma Gap viticultural
area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better
describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 8, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaori Flores, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW.,
Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone (202) 453-1039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
[[Page 57660]]
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties
in the administration and enforcement of these provisions.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of
the regulations and a name and a delineated boundary as established in
part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to its
geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an AVA and provides that any interested party may
petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA. Section
9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for the establishment of AVAs. Petitions to establish an AVA
must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
A copy of the appropriate United States Geological Survey
(USGS) map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the
boundary of the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petaluma Gap Petition
TTB received a petition from Patrick L. Shabram, on behalf of the
Petaluma Gap Winegrowers Alliance, proposing the establishment of the
``Petaluma Gap'' AVA and the modification of the boundary of the
established multi-county North Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.30). The proposed
Petaluma Gap AVA is located in portions of Sonoma and Marin Counties,
California. The proposed AVA covers approximately 202,476 acres and
contains 80 commercially-producing vineyards covering a total of
approximately 4,000 acres, as well as 9 bonded wineries. According to
the petition, the distinguishing features of the proposed Petaluma Gap
AVA include its topography and wind speed.
The proposed AVA lies in southern Sonoma County and northern Marin
County, has a northwest-southeast orientation, and extends from the
Pacific Ocean to San Pablo Bay. As proposed, a small portion of the
Petaluma Gap AVA would overlap a portion of the established North Coast
AVA. To eliminate the potential overlap, the petitioner also proposed
modifying the boundary of the North Coast AVA to eliminate the
potential overlap and place the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA entirely
within the North Coast AVA. The proposed modification would increase
the size of the 3 million-acre North Coast AVA by approximately 28,077
acres. The petition provided evidence that the proposed expansion area
shares the main characteristic of the North Coast AVA--the marine
climate influence that moderates growing season temperatures in the
area. The expansion area was also shown to have similar growing degree
day accumulations to the North Coast AVA and to be within the range of
Winkler scale regions that characterizes the rest of the North Coast
AVA.
The proposed Petaluma Gap AVA is located in the southern portion of
the established Sonoma Coast AVA and shares the marine-influenced
climate and coastal fog of the established AVA. As proposed, the
Petaluma Gap AVA would also partially overlap the southwestern boundary
of the established Sonoma Coast AVA (27 CFR 9.116), leaving the Marin
County portion of the proposed AVA, consisting of approximately 68,130
acres, outside of the Sonoma Coast AVA. The petition did not propose to
modify the boundary of the Sonoma Coast AVA for several reasons,
including the lack of use of the name ``Sonoma Coast'' to describe
lands in Marin County. Additionally, the evidence in the petition
demonstrated that both the Sonoma County and the Marin County portions
of the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA share similar topographic
characteristics and similar wind speeds, so excluding Marin County
entirely would have affected the integrity of the proposed AVA.
Further, TTB notes that removing the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA from the
Sonoma Coast AVA would potentially affect current label holders who use
the ``Sonoma Coast'' appellation on their wines because wines made
primarily from grapes grown in the region removed from the Sonoma Coast
AVA would no longer be eligible to be labeled with that AVA as an
appellation of origin.
According to the petition, the distinguishing features of the
proposed Petaluma Gap AVA are its topography and wind speeds. The
terrain consists of highlands characterized by low, rolling hills not
exceeding 600 feet, except in a few places within the ridgelines that
form the proposed northern, eastern, and southern boundaries. Within
the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA, there are also small valleys and fluvial
terraces, with flat land along the Petaluma River, especially east of
the City of Petaluma and near the mouth of San Pablo Bay. The low
elevations and gently rolling terrain of the proposed Petaluma Gap
create a corridor that allows marine winds to flow relatively
unhindered from the Pacific Ocean to San Pablo Bay, particularly during
the mid-to-late afternoon. As a result, cool air and marine fog enter
the vineyards during the time of day when temperatures would normally
be at their highest, bringing heat relief to the vines.
To the north of the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA, the elevations are
much higher, with elevations over 1,000 feet not uncommon in northern
Sonoma County. The broad Santa Rosa Plain is also located north of the
proposed AVA and has a much flatter topography than the proposed AVA.
East of the proposed AVA, the higher elevations of Sonoma Mountain
prevent much of the marine airflow that enters the Petaluma Gap from
travelling farther east. East of Sonoma Mountain is the Sonoma Valley,
which has lower elevations and flatter terrain than the proposed AVA.
[[Page 57661]]
To the south of the proposed AVA, the elevations can exceed 1,000 feet.
The low elevations and rolling hills of the proposed Petaluma Gap
AVA also allow the marine air to enter the proposed AVA at higher
speeds than found in the surrounding areas, where higher, steeper
mountains disrupt the flow of air. Although marine breezes are present
within the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA during most of the day, the wind
speeds increase significantly in the afternoon hours because the inland
temperatures increase, causing the hot air to rise and pull the cooler,
heavier marine air in from the coast and create steady winds.
The effect of these prolonged high wind speeds on grapes is a
reduction in photosynthesis to the extent that the grapes have to
remain on the vine longer in order to reach a given sugar level (a
longer ``hang time''), compared to the same grape varietal grown in a
less windy location. Grapes grown in windy locations are also typically
smaller and have thicker skins than the same varietal grown elsewhere.
According to the petition, the smaller grape size, thicker skins, and
longer hang time concentrate the flavor compounds in the fruit,
allowing grapes that are harvested at lower sugar levels to still have
the typical flavor characteristics of the grape varietal.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 163 in the Federal Register on October 28,
2016, (81 FR 74979), proposing to establish the Petaluma Gap AVA and
modify the boundary of the North Coast AVA. In the document, TTB
summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the proposed viticultural area. For a
description of the evidence relating to the name, boundary, and
distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural area, and for a
comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed viticultural
area to the surrounding areas, see Notice No. 163.
In Notice No. 163, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. In addition, given the proposed AVA's location
within the existing North Coast AVA and in the southern portion of the
Sonoma Coast AVA, TTB solicited comments on whether the evidence
submitted in the petition regarding the distinguishing features of the
proposed AVA sufficiently differentiates it from the two established
AVAs. TTB also asked for comments on whether the geographical features
of the proposed viticultural area are so distinguishable from the
existing North Coast and Sonoma Coast AVAs that the proposed Petaluma
Gap AVA should not be part of one or either established AVA.
Additionally, TTB asked for comments on the proposed modification
of the North Coast AVA and whether the evidence presented in the
proposed Petaluma Gap AVA petition was sufficient to warrant expansion
of the North Coast AVA to include the entire proposed Petaluma Gap AVA.
Finally, TTB asked for comments on whether the evidence submitted in
the petition supported allowing the partial overlap between the
proposed Petaluma Gap AVA and the established Sonoma Coast AVA. The
comment period on Notice No. 163 closed on December 27, 2016.
In response to Notice No. 163, TTB received a total of 11 comments,
all of which supported the establishment of the Petaluma Gap AVA and
the expansion of the North Coast AVA boundary. Commenters were
primarily local residents, vineyard owners, and members of the wine
industry. The commenters generally supported the proposed AVA due to
the rolling terrain and distinct microclimate, featuring distinct
temperatures, moderate rainfall, the presence of fog, and wind gusts.
Other comments emphasized the distinct flavor of the wines from the
Petaluma Gap region and stated that establishing the Petaluma Gap AVA
will help consumers to buy and identify wine accurately. Several
comments received during the comment period stated that the proposed
AVA has characteristics that are distinct from the larger Sonoma Coast
AVA and warrant its recognition as a sub-AVA. However, none of the
commenters specifically stated that the proposed Petaluma Gap AVA
should be completely removed from the Sonoma Coast AVA. TTB received no
comments in opposition of the Petaluma Gap AVA, as proposed, and no
comments opposing the proposed North Coast AVA boundary modification or
the proposed partial overlap with the Sonoma Coast AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and of the comments received
in response to Notice No. 163, TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner supports the establishment of the approximately 202,476-
acre Petaluma Gap AVA and the modification of the boundary of the North
Coast AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section
1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the TTB
regulations, TTB establishes the ``Petaluma Gap'' AVA in Sonoma and
Marin Counties, in California.
TTB has also determined that the land within the Petaluma Gap AVA
will remain part of the larger North Coast AVA. The Petaluma Gap AVA
shares the basic viticultural feature of the North Coast AVA, which
consists of the marine influence that moderates growing season
temperatures in the area. Therefore, TTB is recognizing the Petaluma
Gap AVA as a distinct AVA within the larger North Coast AVA.
Furthermore, TTB modifies the boundary of the North Coast AVA as
described in Notice No. 163. TTB has determined that the expansion area
has the similar marine-influenced climate of the North Coast AVA.
Therefore, TTB is expanding the North Coast to include all of the
Petaluma Gap AVA. This change is effective 30 days from the date of
publication of this document. TTB is also allowing the partial overlap
of the Petaluma Gap AVA with the Sonoma Coast AVA. The Marin County
portion of the Petaluma Gap AVA will remain outside of the Sonoma Coast
AVA, while the Sonoma County portion will be within the Sonoma Coast
AVA. TTB allows the partial overlap to remain, primarily because the
name ``Sonoma Coast'' is associated only with the coastal region of
Sonoma County and does not extend into Marin County.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the Petaluma Gap AVA and
the modified boundary of the North Coast AVA in the regulatory text
published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. With the establishment of this AVA, its name,
``Petaluma Gap,'' will be recognized as a name of viticultural
significance under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3). The text of the regulation
clarifies this point. Once this final rule becomes effective, wine
bottlers using the name ``Petaluma Gap'' in a brand name, including a
trademark, or in another label reference as to the origin of the wine,
will have to ensure that the product is eligible to use the
viticultural name as an appellation of origin. The establishment of the
Petaluma Gap AVA will allow vintners to use ``Petaluma Gap'' as an
appellation
[[Page 57662]]
of origin for wines made from grapes grown within the Petaluma Gap AVA
if the wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
The establishment of the Petaluma Gap AVA will not affect any
existing viticultural area, and any bottlers using ``North Coast AVA''
as an appellation of origin or in a brand name for wines made from
grapes grown within the North Coast AVA will not be affected by the
establishment of this new AVA. The establishment of the AVA will allow
vintners to use ``Petaluma Gap and ``North Coast'' as appellations of
origin for wines made from grapes grown within the Petaluma Gap AVA if
the wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Additionally, vintners would be able to use ``Sonoma Coast'' as an
appellation of origin on wines made primarily from grapes grown within
the Sonoma County portion of the Petaluma Gap AVA, if the wines meet
the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a brand name that
includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine must be derived
from grapes grown within the area represented by that name, and the
wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the
wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in
a misleading manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new
label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA
name that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7,
1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of a
viticultural area name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts
and consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Kaori Flores of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.30 is amended as follows:
0
a. The introductory text of paragraph (b) is revised;
0
b. The word ``and'' is removed from the end of paragraph (b)(2);
0
c. The period is removed from the end of paragraph (b)(3) and a
semicolon is added in its place;
0
d. Paragraphs (b)(4) and (5) are added;
0
e. Paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) are revised;
0
f. Paragraphs (c)(3) through (24) are redesignated as paragraphs (c)(7)
through (28); and
0
g. Paragraphs (c)(3) through (6) are added.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. [thinsp]9.30 North Coast.
* * * * *
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundaries of the North Coast viticultural area are five U.S.G.S. maps.
They are entitled:
* * * * *
(4) ``Tomales, CA,'' scale 1:24,000, edition of 1995; and
(5) ``Point Reyes NE., CA,'' scale 1:24,000, edition of 1995.
(c) * * *
(1) Then follow the Pacific coastline in a generally southeasterly
direction for 9.4 miles, crossing onto the Tomales map, to Preston
Point on Tomales Bay;
(2) Then northeast along the shoreline of Tomales Bay approximately
1 mile to the mouth of Walker Creek opposite benchmark (BM) 10 on State
Highway 1;
(3) Then southeast in a straight line for 1.3 miles to the marked
714-foot peak;
(4) Then southeast in a straight line for 3.1 miles, crossing onto
the Point Reyes NE map, to the marked 804-foot peak;
(5) Then southeast in a straight line 1.8 miles to the marked 935-
foot peak;
(6) Then southeast in a straight line 12.7 miles, crossing back
onto the Santa Rosa map, to the marked 1,466-foot peak on Barnabe
Mountain;
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 9.261 to read as follows:
Sec. [thinsp]9.261 Petaluma Gap.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Petaluma Gap''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Petaluma Gap'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 12 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Petaluma Gap viticultural area are titled:
(1) Cotati, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1980;
(2) Glen Elle, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1980;
(3) Petaluma River, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1980;
(4) Sears Point, Calif., 1951; photorevised 1968;
(5) Petaluma Point, Calif., 1959; photorevised 1980;
(6) Novato, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1980;
(7) Petaluma, Calif., 1953; photorevised 1981;
(8) Point Reyes NE., CA, 1995;
(9) Tomales, CA, 1995;
(10) Bodega Head, Calif., 1972;
(11) Valley Ford, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1971; and
(12) Two Rock, Calif., 1954; photorevised 1971.
(c) Boundary. The Petaluma Gap viticultural area is located in
Sonoma and Marin Counties in California. The boundary of the Petaluma
Gap viticultural area is as described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (48)
of this section:
(1) The beginning point is on the Cotati map at the intersection of
Grange Road, Crane Canyon Road, and the northern boundary of section
16, T6N/R7W. From the beginning point, proceed southeast in a straight
line for 1 mile, crossing over Pressley Road, to the intersection of
the 900-foot elevation contour and the eastern boundary of section 16,
T6N/R7W; the
(2) Proceed east-southeasterly in a straight line for 0.5 mile,
crossing onto the Glen Ellen map, to the terminus of an unnamed,
unimproved road known locally as Summit View Ranch Road, just north of
the southern boundary of section 15, T6N/R7N; then
(3) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.6 mile to the
intersection of Crane
[[Page 57663]]
Creek and the 1,200-foot elevation contour, section 22, T6N/R7W; then
(4) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 2.9 miles to the
marked 2,271-foot peak on Sonoma Mountain, T6N/R6W; then
(5) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 10.5 miles, crossing
over the northeastern corner of the Petaluma River map and onto the
Sears Point map, to the marked 682-foot summit of Wildcat Mountain;
then
(6) Proceed south-southeasterly in a straight line for 3.3 miles to
the intersection of State Highway 121 (also known locally as Arnold
Drive) and State Highway 37 (also known locally as Sears Point Road);
then
(7) Proceed east-northeasterly along State Highway 37/Sears Point
Road for approximately 0.1 mile to Tolay Creek; then
(8) Proceed generally south along the meandering Tolay Creek for
3.9 miles, crossing onto the Petaluma Point map, to the mouth of the
creek at San Pablo Bay; then
(9) Proceed southwesterly along the shore of San Pablo Bay for 2.7
miles, crossing the mouth of the Petaluma River, and continuing
southeasterly along the bay's shoreline to Petaluma Point; then
(10) Proceed northwesterly in a straight line for 6.3 miles,
crossing over the northeastern corner of the Novato map and onto the
Petaluma River map, to the marked 1,558-foot peak of Burdell Mountain;
then
(11) Proceed northwest in a straight line for 1.3 miles to the
marked 1,193-foot peak; then
(12) Proceed west-southwesterly in a straight line for 2.2 miles,
crossing onto the Petaluma map, to the marked 1,209-foot peak; then
(13) Proceed west-southwest in a straight line for 0.8 mile to the
marked 1,296-foot peak; then
(14) Proceed west in a straight line for 1 mile to the marked
1,257-foot peak on Red Hill in section 31, T4N/R7W; then
(15) Proceed southwest in a straight line for 2.9 miles to the
marked 1,532-foot peak on Hicks Mountain; then
(16) Proceed north-northwesterly in a straight line for 2.7 miles,
crossing onto the Point Reyes NE map, to the marked 1,087-foot peak;
then
(17) Proceed north-northwesterly in a straight line for 1.5 miles
to the marked 1,379-foot peak; then
(18) Proceed west-northwesterly in a straight line for 2.9 miles to
the marked 935-foot peak; then
(19) Proceed northwest in a straight line for 1.8 miles to the
marked 804-foot peak; then
(20) Proceed west-northwesterly in a straight line for 3.1 miles,
crossing onto the Tomales map, to the marked 741-foot peak; then
(21) Proceed northwesterly in a straight line for 1.3 miles to
benchmark (BM) 10 on State Highway 1, at the mouth of Walker Creek in
Tomales Bay; then
(22) Proceed southwesterly, then northwesterly along the shoreline
of Tomales Bay to Sand Point, on Bodega Bay, and continuing northerly
along the shoreline of Bodega Bay, crossing over the Valley Ford map
and onto the Bodega Head map, circling the shoreline of Bodega Harbor
to the Pacific Ocean and continuing northerly along the shoreline of
the Pacific Ocean to the mouth of Salmon Creek, for a total of 19.5
miles; then
(23) Proceed easterly along Salmon Creek for 9.6 miles, crossing
onto the Valley Ford map and passing Nolan Creek, to the second
intermittent stream in the Estero Americano land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(24) Proceed east in a straight line for 1 mile to vertical angle
benchmark (VABM) 724 in the Estero Americano land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(25) Proceed south-southeasterly in a straight line for 0.8 mile to
BM 61 on an unmarked light duty road known locally as Freestone Valley
Ford Road in the Ca[ntilde]ada de Pogolimi land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(26) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.6 mile to the
marked 448-foot peak in the Ca[ntilde]ada de Pogolimi land grant, T6N/
R10W; then
(27) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.1 mile to the
northern terminus of an unnamed, unimproved road in the Ca[ntilde]ada
de Pogolimi land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(28) Proceed northeasterly, then southeasterly for 0.9 mile along
the unnamed, unimproved road to the 400-foot elevation contour in the
Ca[ntilde]ada de Pogolimi land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(29) Proceed easterly along the meandering 400-foot elevation
contour for 6.7 miles, crossing onto the Two Rocks map, to Burnside
Road in the Ca[ntilde]ada de Pogolimi land grant, T6N/R10W; then
(30) Proceed south on Burnside Road for 0.1 mile to an unnamed
medium duty road known locally as Bloomfield Road in the Ca[ntilde]ada
de Pogolimi land grant,T6N/R9W; then
(31) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.6 mile to the
marked 610-foot peak in the Blucher land grant, T6N/R9W; then
(32) Proceed east-southeasterly in a straight line for 0.8 mile to
the marked 641-foot peak in the Blucher land grant, T6N/R9W; then
(33) Proceed northeast in a straight line for 1.2 miles, crossing
through the intersection of an intermittent stream with Canfield Road,
to the common Range \8/9\ boundary; then
(34) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.5 mile to the
marked 542-foot peak; then
(35) Proceed southeast in a straight line for 0.8 mile to the
intersection of an unnamed, unimproved road (leading to four barn-like
structures) known locally as Carniglia Lane and an unnamed medium duty
road known locally as Roblar Road, T6N/R8W; then
(36) Proceed south in a straight line for 0.5 mile to the marked
678-foot peak, T6N/R8W; then
(37) Proceed east-southeast in a straight line for 0.8 mile to the
marked 599-foot peak, T5N/R8W; then
(38) Proceed east-southeast in a straight line for 0.7 mile to the
marked 604-foot peak, T5N/R8W; then
(39) Proceed east-southeast in a straight line for 0.9 mile,
crossing onto the Cotati map, to the intersection of Meacham Road and
an unnamed light duty road leading to a series of barn-like structures,
T5N/R8W; then
(40) Proceed north-northeast along Meacham Road for 0.8 mile to
Stony Point Road, T5N/R8W; then
(41) Proceed southeast along Stony Point Road for 1.1 miles to the
200-foot elevation contour, T5N/R8W; then
(42) Proceed north-northeast in a straight line for 0.5 mile to the
intersection of an intermittent creek with U.S. Highway 101, T5N/R8W;
then
(43) Proceed north along U.S. Highway 101 for 1.5 miles to State
Highway 116 (also known locally as Graverstein Highway), T6N/R8W; then
(44) Proceed northeast in a straight line for 3.4 miles to the
intersection of Crane Creek and Petaluma Hill Road, T6N/R7W; then
(45) Proceed easterly along Crane Creek for 0.8 mile to the
intersection of Crane Creek and the 200-foot elevation line, T6N/R7W;
then
(46) Proceed northwesterly along the 200-foot elevation contour for
1 mile to the intersection of the contour line and an intermittent
stream just south of Crane Canyon Road, T6N/R7W; then
(47) Proceed east then northeasterly along the northern branch of
the intermittent stream for 0.3 mile to the intersection of the stream
with Crane Canyon Road, T6N/R7W; then
(48) Proceed northeasterly along Crane Canyon Road for 1.2 miles,
returning to the beginning point.
[[Page 57664]]
Signed: June 14, 2017.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: October 26, 2017.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2017-26410 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P