[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 198 (Monday, October 16, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47988-47992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22241]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0437; FRL-9969-32-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Miscellaneous Metal Parts
Surface Coating, Miscellaneous Plastic Parts Surface Coating, and
Pleasure Craft Surface Coatings
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's state implementation plan (SIP). The revision includes
amendments to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection's
(PADEP) regulations and addresses the requirement to adopt reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for sources covered by EPA's
control techniques guidelines (CTG) standards for the following
categories: Miscellaneous metal parts surface coating, miscellaneous
plastic parts surface coating, and pleasure craft surface coatings, as
well as related cleaning activities. The SIP revision also amends
regulations for graphic arts systems and mobile equipment repair and
refinishing as well as making general administrative changes. This
action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on December 15, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by November 15,
2017. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2017-0437 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory A. Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or
by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2016, PADEP submitted a
revision to the Pennsylvania SIP concerning the adoption of EPA's CTG
for miscellaneous metal parts surface coating processes, miscellaneous
plastic parts surface coating processes, and pleasure craft surface
coatings. Specifically, PADEP has amended 25 Pennsylvania Code (Pa.
Code) Chapter 129 (relating to standards for sources) to address RACT
and further reduce volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions in
Pennsylvania. In accordance with sections 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2)(A) and
184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, Pennsylvania's SIP revision submittal
establishes VOC emission limitations and other requirements consistent
with the recommendations of EPA's 2008 Control Techniques Guidelines
for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings (MMPP) (Publication
No. EPA 453/R-08-003; September 2008) and Control Techniques Guidelines
for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings for these sources
in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Publication No. EPA 453/R-08-006).
I. Background
Ground level ozone is formed in the atmosphere by photochemical
reactions between VOCs, nitrogen oxides (NOX), and carbon
monoxide (CO) in the presence of sunlight. In order to reduce ozone
concentrations in the ambient air, the CAA requires all nonattainment
areas to apply controls on VOC and NOX emission sources to
achieve emission reductions. Among effective control measures, RACT
controls significantly reduce VOC and NOX emissions from
major stationary sources. NOX and VOC are referred to as
ozone precursors and are emitted by many types of pollution sources,
including motor vehicles, power plants, industrial facilities, and area
wide sources, such as consumer products and lawn and garden equipment.
Scientific evidence indicates that adverse public health effects occur
following exposure to ozone. These effects are more pronounced in
children and adults with lung disease. Breathing air containing ozone
can reduce lung function and inflame airways, which can increase
respiratory symptoms and aggravate asthma or other lung diseases.
RACT is defined as the lowest emission limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility (44 FR 53761 at 53762, September 17, 1979). Section 182 of
the CAA sets forth two separate RACT requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas. The first requirement, contained in section
182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, and referred to as RACT fix-up requires the
correction of RACT rules for which EPA identified deficiencies before
the CAA was amended in 1990. Pennsylvania previously corrected its
deficiencies under the 1-hour ozone standard and has no further
deficiencies to correct under this section of the CAA. The second
requirement, set forth in section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, applies to
moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment area as well as to marginal and
attainment areas in ozone transport regions (OTRs) established pursuant
to section 184 of the CAA, and requires these areas to implement RACT
controls on all major VOC and NOX emission sources and on
all sources and source categories covered by a CTG issued by EPA.\1\
See CAA section 182(b)(2) and 184(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CTGs are documents issued by EPA intended to provide state
and local air pollution control authorities information to assist
them in determining RACT for VOC from various sources. The
recommendations in the CTG are based upon available data and
information and may not apply to a particular situation based upon
the circumstances. States can follow the CTG and adopt state
regulations to implement the recommendations contained therein, or
they can adopt alternative approaches. In either case, states must
submit their RACT rules to EPA for review and approval as part of
the SIP process. Pursuant to section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, all
areas in the OTR must implement RACT with respect to sources of VOCs
in the state covered by a CTG issued before or after November 15,
1990.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 47989]]
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated the health-based national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone based on 8-hour average
concentrations. 62 FR 38856. On April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858), EPA
designated 37 counties in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as 8-hour
ozone nonattainment areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. On March 27,
2008, EPA revised the 8-hour ozone standard to a new 0.075 parts per
million (ppm) level (73 FR 16436). On May 21, 2012, EPA finalized
designations for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (77 FR 30087). EPA
designated five areas in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as
nonattainment. These areas include all or a portion of Allegheny,
Armstrong, Berks, Beaver, Bucks, Butler, Carbon, Chester, Delaware,
Fayette, Lancaster, Lehigh, Montgomery, Northampton, Philadelphia,
Washington, and Westmoreland Counties. On October 26, 2015, EPA revised
the 8-hour ozone standard to a new 0.070 ppm level (80 FR 65292). This
rulemaking does not address SIP requirements under the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is in the OTR
established by Congress in CAA section 184 and is thus subject to
implementing RACT for all sources of VOC in the state covered by a CTG
issued before or after November 15, 2990 pursuant to CAA section
184(b)(1)(B).
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment
areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM),
including RACT, for sources of emissions. Pursuant to section
184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, regardless of an area's nonattainment status,
all areas in the OTR must implement RACT with respect to sources of
VOCs in the Commonwealth covered by a CTG issued before or after
November 15, 1990. In addition, pursuant to CAA section 184(b)(2),
unless more stringent nonattainment area requirements apply, stationary
sources in states or portions of a state within the OTR that emit at
least 50 tons per year of VOCs shall be considered major stationary
sources subject to requirements applicable to major stationary sources
as if the area were classified as a Moderate nonattainment area
including requirements for CTGs and RACT.
Pennsylvania has implemented numerous RACT controls to meet the CAA
RACT requirements under the 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These
RACT controls were promulgated in title 25 of the Pennsylvania Code,
chapter 129, Standards for Sources. In accordance with CAA section
184(b)(1)(B), to achieve and maintain the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, the Commonwealth Pennsylvania must continue to adopt and
implement VOC RACT emission control measures for source categories
covered by all CTGs issued by EPA, as of 2014, including miscellaneous
metal parts surface coating processes, miscellaneous plastic parts
surface coating processes, and pleasure craft surface coatings.
CTGs are documents issued by EPA intended to provide state and
local air pollution control authorities information to assist them in
assessing RACT for VOC from various sources. Section 183(e)(3)(c)
provides that EPA may issue a CTG in lieu of a national regulation as
RACT for a product category where EPA determines that the CTG will be
substantially as effective as regulations in reducing emissions of VOC
in ozone nonattainment areas. The recommendations in the CTG are based
upon available data and information and may not apply to particular
situations based on unique circumstances. To date, EPA has issued 44
CTGs, providing guidelines for the control of VOC emissions from these
types of sources. States can follow the CTG and adopt state regulations
to implement the recommendations contained therein, or they can adopt
alternative approaches. In either case, states must submit their RACT
rules to EPA for review and approval as part of the SIP process.
EPA developed the CTG for MMPP in September 2008 (Publication No.
EPA 453/R-08-003) that provides guidelines with regard to feasible
emission limitations and operating practices for a number of different
surface coatings used within this large and diverse source category.
The 2008 MMPP CTG recommends separate sets of emission limits for metal
parts coatings, plastic parts coatings, automotive/transportation and
business machine plastic parts, and pleasure craft, depending on the
type of coating used by a particular source. The miscellaneous metal
product and plastic parts surface coatings categories under section
183(e) of the CAA include the coatings that are applied to the surfaces
of a varied range of metal and plastic parts and products. Such parts
or products are constructed either entirely or partially from metal or
plastic. These miscellaneous metal products and plastic parts include,
but are not limited to, metal and plastic components of the following
types of products as well as the products themselves: Fabricated metal
products, molded plastic parts, small and large farm machinery,
commercial and industrial machinery and equipment, automotive or
transportation equipment, interior or exterior automotive parts,
construction equipment, motor vehicle accessories, bicycles and
sporting goods, toys, recreational vehicles, pleasure craft
(recreational boats), extruded aluminum structural components, railroad
cars, heavier vehicles, lawn and garden equipment, business machines,
laboratory and medical equipment, electronic equipment, steel drums,
metal pipes, and numerous other industrial and household products.
The pleasure craft coating category does not include coatings that
are a part of other product categories listed under Section 183(e) of
the CAA for which CTGs have been published or included in other CTGs.
For pleasure craft surface coatings, EPA took into account California
regulations when developing the 2008 MMPP CTG. California was the only
state at that time with regulations governing VOC emissions from
pleasure craft surface coatings. After EPA finalized the 2008 MMPP CTG,
the pleasure craft coatings industry asserted to EPA that three of the
VOC emission limits in the CTG were too low considering the performance
requirements of the pleasure craft coatings and that the VOC emission
limits recommended did not represent RACT for the National pleasure
craft coatings industry. On September 14, 2009, EPA was contacted by
the pleasure craft coatings industry to reconsider some of the VOC
emission limits recommended in the final 2008 MMPP CTG. In response,
EPA issued a memorandum on June 1, 2010, entitled ``Control Technique
Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Part Coatings--Industry
Request for Reconsideration,'' recommending that the pleasure craft
industry work with state agencies during their RACT rule development
process to assess what is reasonable for the specific sources
regulated. EPA has stated that states can use the recommendations from
the MMPP CTG to form their own determinations as to what constitutes
RACT for pleasure craft coating operations. CTGs impose no legally
binding requirements on any entity, including pleasure craft coating
facilities. As stated in the memorandum, EPA will evaluate state-
developed RACT rules and determine whether the submitted rules meet the
RACT requirements of the CAA.
[[Page 47990]]
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
On November, 18, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision which adopted
the recommendations contained in the 2008 MMPP CTG with respect to
sources in the miscellaneous metal products coatings and plastic parts
coatings product categories. For the pleasure craft coating industry,
after evaluating what is reasonable for this source category, PADEP
determined that three VOC content limits applicable to the source
categories should be revised from the limits in the CTG to represent
RACT for the industry. This is based on EPA's memorandum that the
pleasure craft industry should work with state agencies during their
RACT rule development process to assess what is reasonable for the
specific sources regulated.
The SIP revision includes an amendment to 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129--
(relating to standards for sources) as follows: (1) Amended section
129.51(a)--(relating to general) in order to extend applicability; (2)
added section 129.52(d)--``Control of VOC emissions from miscellaneous
metal parts surface coating processes, miscellaneous plastic parts
surface coating processes and pleasure craft surface coatings,'' in
order to regulate VOC emissions from miscellaneous metal parts surface
coating processes, miscellaneous plastic parts surface coating
processes and pleasure craft surface coatings; (3) amended section
129.52(g)--(relating to surface coating processes) in order to clarify
record keeping and reporting requirements; (4) added section 129.52(k)
in order to clarify the applicability of the requirements of section
129.52, Table I, Category 10 in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129; (5) amended
section 129.67--(relating to graphic arts systems) in order to extend
applicability; and (6) amended section 129.75--(relating to mobile
equipment repair and refinishing) in order to specify exceptions for
those who apply surface coating to mobile equipment already subject to
requirements of sections 129.52 and 129.52(d). More detailed
information on these provisions as well as a detailed summary of EPA's
review and rationale for proposing to approve these SIP revisions can
be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) for this action which
is available on line at www.regulations.gov, Docket number EPA-R03-OAR-
2017-0437.
After evaluating this SIP revision submittal, EPA concludes that
this SIP submittal which addresses the 2008 MMPP CTG and makes other
related administrative changes, meets CAA requirements under sections
110, 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2)(A), and 184(b)(1) by adopting EPA's CTG and
continuing to address and minimize VOC emissions in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania as discussed in more detail in EPA's TSD for this
rulemaking action. PADEP is adopting the requirements as recommended by
the MMPPC CTG and adopting the pleasure craft industry recommendations
for the following three coating categories: Antifouling Sealer/Tiecoat;
Other Substrate Antifoulant; and Extreme High Gloss. For these three
categories, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania reviewed industry data and
determined that for the purpose of functionality, cost, and VOC
emissions, the alternative limits adopted for these three coating
categories constitute RACT. EPA concludes that Pennsylvania's approach
is consistent with the guidance memorandum entitled, ``Control
Technique Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Part
Coatings--Industry Request for Reconsideration,'' and therefore,
concludes that these regulations reflect RACT given costs and VOC
emissions. The revised VOC content limits for the pleasure craft
surface coatings proposed by PADEP are expected to have a de minimis
impact on the amount of VOC emission reductions from the implementation
of the revised VOC limits due to having no facilities with the
potential to emit VOC emissions for pleasure craft surface coatings.
EPA notes that under 25 Pa. Code section 129.52d, PADEP is allowing
the provisions of 25 Pa. Code section 129.52d to supersede the
requirements of a RACT permit previously issued under 25 Pa. Code
sections 129.91-129.95 if the permit was issued prior to January 1,
2017, to the owner or operator of a source subject to section
129.52d(a), except to the extent the RACT permit contains more
stringent requirements. EPA further notes that the RACT permits issued
under 25 Pa. Code sections 129.91-129.95 were issued for previous RACT
determinations on a case-by-case basis; these permits were then
submitted to EPA as source-specific SIP revisions and were previously
acted on by EPA and would have been approved into the Pennsylvania SIP.
If EPA approved those source-specific RACT determinations as meeting
the requirements of RACT under the CAA, then the permits associated
with those determinations were approved into the SIP as listed in 40
CFR 52.2020(d). The requirements of the source-specific RACT
determination which EPA approved into the Pennsylvania SIP remain
applicable requirements for the specific source unless and until
Pennsylvania seeks to remove the limits from the SIP in accordance with
CAA section 110(l). To the extent that the provisions of 25 Pa. Code
section 129.52d are more stringent than those of a previous SIP-
approved permit, PADEP will need to make a source-specific
determination as to whether the requirements of the previous RACT
permit apply, or those of section 129.52d, and submit that
determination to EPA as a SIP revision in order to remove the
previously approved permit from the SIP. Until such a SIP revision is
made, EPA cannot remove the source-specific permits from the SIP and
EPA is not taking such action in this rulemaking. Thus, the
requirements of a previously SIP-approved permit are not superseded
under the SIP. In accordance with section 110 of the CAA including
110(a) and 110(l), EPA determines that approval of this PADEP SIP
revision will not interfere with reasonable further progress,
attainment of any NAAQS or any other applicable CAA requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's November 2016
SIP revision submittal, which adopts RACT requirements for
miscellaneous metal parts surface coating, miscellaneous plastic parts
surface coating, and pleasure craft surface coatings and which makes
other related administrative changes, as the revision meets
requirements in CAA sections 110, 172(c)(1), 182(b)(2)(A), and
184(b)(2). EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because
EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on December 15, 2017 without further
notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by November 15, 2017. If EPA
receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so
at this time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
[[Page 47991]]
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Pennsylvania rule discussed in section II of this preamble. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through http://www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region III Office
(please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information
Contact'' section of this preamble for more information). Therefore,
these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP,
have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully
federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 15, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action. This action, which approves Pennsylvania's SIP
revision adopting CTGs for miscellaneous metal parts surface coating,
miscellaneous plastic parts surface coating, and pleasure craft surface
coatings, as well as general administrative changes related to cleaning
activities, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: September 27, 2017.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entries for Sections 129.51 and 129.52;
0
b. Adding an entry in numerical order for Section 129.52d; and
0
c. Revising the entries for Sections 129.67 and 129.75.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 47992]]
(1) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
State citation Title/ subject State EPA approval date explanation/ Sec.
effective date 52.2063 citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 25--Environmental Protection
Article III--Air Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 129.51................ General............. 10/22/16 10/16/17, [Insert Revised Section
Federal Register 129.51(a).
citation].
Section 129.52................ Surface coating 10/22/16 10/16/17, [Insert Revised 129.52(g)
processes. Federal Register and added
citation]. Subsection
129.52(k).
* * * * * * *
Section 129.52d............... Control of VOCs from 10/22/16 10/16/17, [Insert New section 129.52d
Miscellaneous Metal Federal Register is added. This
Parts Surface citation]. section does not
Coating Processes, remove or replace
Miscellaneous any permits
Plastic Parts approved under
Surface Coating paragraph (d) of
Processes and this section.
Pleasure Craft
Surface Coatings.
* * * * * * *
Section 129.67................ Graphic arts systems 10/22/16 10/16/17, [Insert Revised Subsection
Federal Register 129.67(a)(1).
citation].
* * * * * * *
Section 129.75................ Mobile equipment 10/22/16 10/16/17, [Insert Revised Subsection
repair and Federal Register 129.75(b)(1).
refinishing. citation]. Previous approval 8/
14/00 (c)(148).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-22241 Filed 10-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P