[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42279-42281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-19010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

[Docket No. 170816771-7771-01]
RIN 0694-XC040


Effects of Extending Foreign Policy-Based Export Controls Through 
2018

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) is seeking public 
comments on the effect of existing foreign policy-based export controls 
in the Export Administration Regulations. Section 6 of the Export 
Administration Act requires BIS to consult with industry on the effect 
of such controls and to report the results of the consultations to 
Congress. BIS is conducting the consultations through this request for 
public comments.

[[Page 42280]]

Comments from all interested persons are welcome and will help BIS 
determine whether its foreign policy-based export controls should be 
continued for another year. All comments will be made available for 
public inspection and copying and included in a report to be submitted 
to Congress.

DATES: Comments must be received by October 10, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this rule may be submitted through the Federal 
e-Rulemaking portal (www.regulations.gov). The regulations.gov ID for 
this rule is: BIS-2017-0024. Comments may also be sent by email to 
[email protected] or on paper to Regulatory Policy Division, 
Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce, 14th Street & 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 2099B, Washington, DC 20230. Include the 
phrase ``FPBEC Comment'' in the subject line of the email message or on 
the envelope if submitting comments on paper. All comments must be in 
writing (either submitted to regulations.gov, by email or on paper). 
All comments, including Personal Identifying Information (e.g., name, 
address) voluntarily submitted by the commenter will be a matter of 
public record and will be available for public inspection and copying. 
Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive 
or protected information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracy Patts, Foreign Policy Division, 
Office of Nonproliferation Controls and Treaty Compliance, Bureau of 
Industry and Security, telephone 202-482-6389. Copies of the current 
Annual Foreign Policy Report to the Congress are available at http://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/about-bis/newsroom/archives/27-about-bis/502-foreign-policy-reports, and copies may also be requested by calling the 
Office of Nonproliferation and Treaty Compliance at the number listed 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign policy-based controls in the Export 
Administration Regulations (EAR) are implemented pursuant to section 6 
of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, (50 U.S.C. 4601-
4623 (Supp. III 2015)) (EAA). The current foreign policy-based export 
controls maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) are 
set forth in the EAR (15 CFR parts 730-774), including in parts 742 
(CCL Based Controls), 744 (End-User and End-Use Based Controls) and 746 
(Embargoes and Other Special Controls). These controls apply to a range 
of countries, items, activities and persons, including:
     Chemical precursors and biological agents, associated 
equipment, technical data, and software related to the production of 
chemical and biological agents (Sec. Sec.  742.2 and 744.4) and various 
chemicals included on the list of those chemicals controlled pursuant 
to the Chemical Weapons Convention (Sec.  742.18);
     Equipment and related technical data used in the design, 
development, production, or use of certain rocket systems and unmanned 
air vehicles (Sec. Sec.  742.5 and 744.3);
     Regional stability (Sec.  742.6);
     Crime control and detection items (Sec.  742.7);
     Countries designated as Supporters of Acts of 
International Terrorism (Sec. Sec.  742.8, 742.9, 742.10, 742.19, 
746.4, 746.7, and 746.9);
     Specially designed implements of torture (Sec.  742.11);
     Communication intercepting devices, software and 
technology (Sec.  742.13);
     Significant items (SI): Hot section technology for the 
development, production, or overhaul of commercial aircraft engines, 
components, and systems (Sec.  742.14);
     Encryption items (Sec.  742.15);
     Certain firearms and related items based on the 
Organization of American States Model Regulations for the Control of 
the International Movement of Firearms, their Parts and Components and 
Ammunition included within the Inter-American Convention Against the 
Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, 
Explosives, and Other Related Materials (Sec.  742.17);
     Maritime nuclear propulsion (Sec.  744.5);
     Certain foreign aircraft and vessels (Sec.  744.7);
     Certain persons designated as proliferators of weapons of 
mass destruction (Sec.  744.8);
     Certain cameras to be used by military end-users or 
incorporated into a military commodity (Sec.  744.9);
     Certain entities in Russia (Sec.  744.10);
     Individual terrorists and terrorist organizations 
(Sec. Sec.  744.12, 744.13 and 744.14);
     Entities acting contrary to the national security or 
foreign policy interests of the United States (Sec.  744.11);
     Certain general purpose microprocessors for ``military 
end-uses'' and ``military end-users'' (Sec.  744.17);
     Certain persons designated by Executive Order 13315 
(``Blocking Property of the Former Iraqi Regime, Its Senior Officials 
and Their Family Members'') (Sec.  744.18);
     Certain sanctioned entities (Sec.  744.20);
     Embargoed countries (Part 746);
     U.S. and U.N. arms embargoes (Sec.  746.1 and Country 
Group D:5 of Supplement No. 1 to Part 740); and
     Industry sectors and regions related to U.S. policy 
towards Russia (Sec.  746.5).
    In addition, the EAR impose foreign policy-based export controls on 
certain nuclear related commodities, technology, end-uses and end-users 
(Sec. Sec.  742.3 and 744.2), in part, implementing section 309(c) of 
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act (42 U.S.C. 2139a).
    Under the provisions of section 6 of the EAA, export controls 
maintained for foreign policy purposes must be extended annually. 
Section 6 of the EAA requires a report to Congress when foreign policy-
based export controls are extended. The EAA expired on August 20, 2001. 
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783 
(2002)), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 2013 (3 CFR, 
2013 Comp., p. 223 (2014), which has been extended by successive 
Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 15, 2017, 
(82 FR 39005 (August 16, 2017)) continues the EAR and, to the extent 
permitted by law, the provisions of the EAA, in effect under the 
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. 
(2012)). The Department of Commerce, as appropriate, follows the 
provisions of section 6 of the EAA by reviewing its foreign policy-
based export controls, conducting consultations with industry on such 
controls through public comments and preparing a report to be submitted 
to Congress. In January 2017, the Secretary of Commerce, on the 
recommendation of the Secretary of State, extended for one year all 
foreign policy-based export controls then in effect. BIS is now 
soliciting public comment on the effects of extending the existing 
foreign policy-based export controls from January 2018 to January 2019. 
Among the criteria considered in determining whether to extend U.S. 
foreign policy-based export controls are the following:
    1. The likelihood that such controls will achieve their intended 
foreign policy purposes, in light of other factors, including the 
availability from other countries of the goods, software or technology 
proposed for such controls;
    2. Whether the foreign policy objective of such controls can be 
achieved through negotiations or other alternative means;
    3. The compatibility of the controls with the foreign policy 
objectives of the United States and with overall U.S.

[[Page 42281]]

policy toward the country subject to the controls;
    4. Whether the reaction of other countries to the extension of such 
controls is not likely to render the controls ineffective in achieving 
the intended foreign policy objective or be counterproductive to U.S. 
foreign policy interests;
    5. The comparative benefits to U.S. foreign policy objectives 
versus the effect of the controls on the export performance of the 
United States, the competitive position of the United States in the 
international economy, the international reputation of the United 
States as a supplier of goods and technology; and
    6. The ability of the United States to effectively enforce the 
controls.
    BIS is particularly interested in receiving comments on the 
economic impact of proliferation controls. BIS is also interested in 
industry information relating to the following:
    1. Information on the effect of foreign policy-based export 
controls on sales of U.S. products to third countries (i.e., those 
countries not targeted by sanctions), including the views of foreign 
purchasers or prospective customers regarding U.S. foreign policy-based 
export controls.
    2. Information on controls maintained by U.S. trade partners. For 
example, to what extent do U.S. trade partners have similar controls on 
goods and technology on a worldwide basis or to specific destinations?
    3. Information on licensing policies or practices by our foreign 
trade partners that are similar to U.S. foreign policy based export 
controls, including license review criteria, use of conditions, and 
requirements for pre- and post-shipment verifications (preferably 
supported by examples of approvals, denials and foreign regulations).
    4. Suggestions for bringing foreign policy-based export controls 
more into line with multilateral practice.
    5. Comments or suggestions to make multilateral controls more 
effective.
    6. Information that illustrates the effect of foreign policy-based 
export controls on trade or acquisitions by intended targets of the 
controls.
    7. Data or other information on the effect of foreign policy-based 
export controls on overall trade at the level of individual industrial 
sectors.
    8. Suggestions for measuring the effect of foreign policy-based 
export controls on trade.
    9. Information on the use of foreign policy-based export controls 
on targeted countries, entities, or individuals. BIS is also interested 
in comments relating generally to the extension or revision of existing 
foreign policy-based export controls.
    Parties submitting comments are asked to be as specific as 
possible. All comments received before the close of the comment period 
will be considered by BIS in reviewing the controls and in developing 
the report to Congress. All comments received in response to this 
notice will be displayed on BIS's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Web 
site at http://efoia.bis.doc.gov/ and on the Federal e-Rulemaking 
portal at www.Regulations.gov. All comments will also be included in a 
report to Congress, as required by section 6 of the EAA, which directs 
that BIS report to Congress the results of its consultations with 
industry on the effects of foreign policy-based controls.

Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-19010 Filed 9-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-33-P