[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41603-41607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-18727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-122-862]


Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper From Canada: Initiation of 
Countervailing Duty Investigation

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Applicable September 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo at (202) 482-3693, or 
Whitley Herndon at (202) 482-6274, Office II, AD/CVD Operations, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Petition

    On August 9, 2017, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) 
received a countervailing duty (CVD) Petition concerning imports of 
certain uncoated groundwood paper (UGW paper) from Canada, filed in 
proper form on behalf of North Pacific Paper Company (NORPAC, or the 
petitioner).\1\ The CVD Petition was accompanied by an antidumping duty 
(AD) Petition concerning imports of UGW paper from Canada. The 
petitioner is a domestic producer of UGW paper.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Letter from the petitioner re: ``Petitions for the 
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Uncoated 
Groundwood Paper from Canada,'' dated August 9, 2017 (the Petition).
    \2\ Id., Volume I of the Petition, at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 11 and 14, 2017, the Department requested supplemental 
information pertaining to certain areas of the Petition.\3\ The 
petitioner filed responses to these requests on August 15 and 16, 
2017.\4\ On August 17, 2017, the Department contacted the petitioner 
regarding the proposed scope of the investigations.\5\ The petitioner 
filed revised scope language on August 21, 2017.\6\ As discussed below, 
on August 10, 2017, the Department issued polling questionnaires to all 
known U.S. producers of UGW paper. The Department received responses 
from all recipients of the polling questionnaires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Department Letter re: Petitions for the Imposition of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Imports of Certain Uncoated 
Groundwood Paper from Canada: Supplemental Questions, dated August 
11, 2017 (General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire); see also 
Department Letter re: Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing 
Duties on Imports of Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada, 
dated August 14, 2017.
    \4\ See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain Uncoated 
Groundwood Paper from Canada/Responses to Supplemental Questions on 
the Injury Volume of the Petitions, dated August 15, 2017 (General 
Issues Supplemental Response); see also Letter from the petitioner 
re: Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada/Petitioner's 
Responses to Supplemental Questions on the Countervailing Duty 
Volume of the Petition, dated August 16, 2017 (CVD Supplement).
    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Phone Call with Counsel to the 
Petitioner,'' dated August 17, 2017 (Scope Phone Call).
    \6\ See Letter from the petitioner re: Certain Uncoated 
Groundwood Paper from Canada/Further Revisions to The Scope 
Language, dated August 21, 2017 (Scope Revision Letter).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the Act), the petitioner alleges that the Government of Canada 
(GOC) and the provincial governments of Alberta (GOA), British Colombia 
(GBS), Newfoundland and Labrador (GNL), Ontario (GOO), Quebec (GOQ), 
and New Brunswick (GNB) are providing countervailable subsidies, within 
the meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to imports of UGW 
paper from Canada and that such imports are materially injuring, or 
threatening material injury to, the domestic industry producing UGW 
paper in the United States. Also, consistent with section 702(b)(1) of 
the Act, for those alleged programs on which we are initiating a CVD 
investigation, the Petition is accompanied by information reasonably 
available to the petitioner supporting its allegations.
    The Department finds that the petitioner filed this Petition on 
behalf of the domestic industry because the petitioner is an interested 
party as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. The Department also 
finds that the petitioner demonstrated sufficient industry support with 
respect to the initiation of the CVD investigation that the petitioner 
is requesting.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See the ``Determination of Industry Support for the 
Petition'' section, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Period of Investigation

    Because the Petition was filed on August 9, 2017, the period of 
investigation (POI) is January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016.

[[Page 41604]]

Scope of the Investigation

    The product covered by this investigation is UGW paper from Canada. 
For a full description of the scope of this investigation, see the 
``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the Appendix to this notice.

Comments on Scope of the Investigation

    During our review of the Petition, the Department issued questions 
to, and received responses from, the petitioner pertaining to the 
proposed scope to ensure that the scope language in the Petition would 
be an accurate reflection of the products for which the domestic 
industry is seeking relief.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See General Issues Supplemental Questionnaire; see also 
General Issues Supplemental Response, and Scope Revision Letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations, we 
are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues 
regarding product coverage (scope).\9\ The Department will consider all 
comments received from interested parties and, if necessary, will 
consult with the interested parties prior to the issuance of the 
preliminary determination. If scope comments include factual 
information,\10\ all such factual information should be limited to 
public information. To facilitate preparation of its questionnaires, 
the Department requests all interested parties to submit such comments 
by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on Monday, September 18, 2017, which is 
20 calendar days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal 
comments, which may include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 
p.m. ET on Thursday, September 28, 2017, which is 10 calendar days from 
the initial comments deadline.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997).
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual 
information'').
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department requests that any factual information the parties 
consider relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during 
this time period. However, if a party subsequently finds that 
additional factual information pertaining to the scope of the 
investigation may be relevant, the party may contact the Department and 
request permission to submit the additional information. All such 
comments must be filed on the records of the concurrent AD and CVD 
investigations.

Filing Requirements

    All submissions to the Department must be filed electronically 
using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty and Countervailing 
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\12\ An 
electronically filed document must be received successfully in its 
entirety by the time and date it is due. Documents exempted from the 
electronic submission requirements must be filed manually (i.e., in 
paper form) with Enforcement and Compliance's APO/Dockets Unit, Room 
18022, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230, and stamped with the date and time of receipt by 
the applicable deadlines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011), see also Enforcement and 
Compliance: Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 
(November 20, 2014) for details of the Department's electronic 
filing requirements, which went into effect on August 5, 2011. 
Information on help using ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx, and a handbook can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consultations

    Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, the 
Department notified representatives of the GOC of the receipt of the 
Petition, and provided them the opportunity for consultations with 
respect to the CVD Petition.\13\ Consultations with the GOC were held 
at the Department of Commerce on August 23, 2017.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Letter to the Embassy of Canada re: Uncoated Groundwood 
Paper from Canada: Invitation for Consultations to Discuss the 
Countervailing Duty Petition, dated August 10, 2017.
    \14\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain 
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: GOC Consultations,'' dated 
August 24, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determination of Industry Support for the Petition

    Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on 
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act 
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic 
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least 
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and 
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like 
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support 
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of 
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of 
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of 
the total production of the domestic like product, the Department 
shall: (i) Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to 
determine if there is support for the petition, as required by 
subparagraph (A); or (ii) determine industry support using a 
statistically valid sampling method to poll the ``industry.''
    Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the 
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine 
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute 
directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the 
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which 
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has 
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like 
product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and 
the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic 
like product,\15\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a 
separate and distinct authority. In addition, the Department's 
determination is subject to limitations of time and information. 
Although this may result in different definitions of the like product, 
such differences do not render the decision of either agency contrary 
to law.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
    \16\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. 
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a 
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in 
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation 
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic 
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an 
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be 
investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the 
Petition).
    With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioner does not 
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope 
of the investigation. Based on our analysis of the information 
submitted on the record, we have determined that UGW paper, as defined 
in the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product and we have 
analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as 
applied to this case, see Countervailing Duty Investigation 
Initiation Checklist: Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada 
(CVD Initiation Checklist), at Attachment II, Analysis of Industry 
Support for the Petitions Covering Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper 
from Canada (Attachment II). This checklist is dated concurrently 
with this notice and on file electronically via ACCESS. Access to 
documents filed via ACCESS is also available in the Central Records 
Unit (CRU), Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 41605]]

    Based on information provided in the Petition, the share of total 
estimated U.S. production of the domestic like product in calendar year 
2016 represented by the petitioner did not account for more than 50 
percent of the total production of the domestic like product. 
Therefore, in accordance with section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act, we 
polled the industry.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 10, 2017, we issued polling questionnaires to all known 
producers of UGW paper, identified in the Petition.\19\ We requested 
that each company complete the polling questionnaire and certify its 
response by the due date specified in the cover letter to the 
questionnaire.\20\ On August 23, 2017, in consultations with the 
Department held with respect to the CVD Petition, the GOC provided 
comments on industry support.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Volume I of the Petition, at Exhibit I-8; see also 
Memorandum, ``Certain Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: Polling 
Questionnaire,'' dated August 14, 2017.
    \20\ For a detailed discussion of the responses received, see 
CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II. The polling 
questionnaire and questionnaire responses are on file electronically 
via ACCESS and can also be accessed through the CRU.
    \21\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on Certain 
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada: GOC Consultations,'' dated 
August 24, 2017; and letter from the GOC re: ``Uncoated Groundwood 
Paper from Canada: Submission of Consultations Paper,'' dated August 
25, 2017. For a discussion of the GOC's comments, see the AD 
Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 702(c)(4)(B) of the Act states that (i) the Department 
``shall disregard the position of domestic producers who oppose the 
petition if such producers are related to foreign producers, as defined 
in section 771(4)(B)(ii), unless such domestic producers demonstrate 
that their interests as domestic producers would be adversely affected 
by the imposition of an antidumping duty order;'' and (ii) the 
Department ``may disregard the position of domestic producers of a 
domestic like product who are importers of the subject merchandise.'' 
In addition, 19 CFR 351.203(e)(4) states that the position of a 
domestic producer that opposes the petition (i) will be disregarded if 
such producer is related to a foreign producer or to a foreign exporter 
under section 771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act, unless such domestic producer 
demonstrates to the Secretary's satisfaction that its interests as a 
domestic producer would be adversely affected by the imposition of an 
antidumping order; and (ii) may be disregarded if the producer is an 
importer of the subject merchandise or is related to such an importer 
under section 771(4)(B)(ii) of the Act.
    We received objection to the Petition from those that produce 
domestic like product and are related to a foreign producer of subject 
merchandise and/or who imported subject merchandise from Canada. We 
have analyzed the information provided in the polling questionnaire 
responses and information provided in other submissions to the 
Department. Based on our analysis, we disregarded the opposition 
pursuant to section 702(c)(4)(B) of the Act. When the position in 
opposition to the petition is disregarded, the industry support 
requirements of section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act are satisfied.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment II.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The data collected demonstrate that the domestic producers of UGW 
paper which support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the 
total production of the domestic like product and, once the opposition 
is disregarded, account for more than 50 percent of the production of 
the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry 
expressing support for, or opposition to, the Petition.\23\ Therefore, 
the Department determines that the petitioner filed this Petition on 
behalf of the domestic industry in accordance with section 702(b)(1) of 
the Act because it is an interested party as defined in section 
771(9)(C) of the Act and it has demonstrated sufficient industry 
support with respect to the CVD investigation that it is requesting the 
Department initiate.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Injury Test

    Because Canada is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the 
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act 
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine 
whether imports of the subject merchandise from Canada materially 
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.

Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation

    The petitioner alleges that imports of the subject merchandise are 
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are 
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry 
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioner 
alleges that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold 
provided for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Volume I of the Petition, at 19 and Exhibit I-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The petitioner contends that the industry's injured condition is 
illustrated by a significant volume of subject imports and significant 
increase in the volume of subject imports relative to U.S. consumption; 
reduced market share; underselling and price suppression or depression; 
lost sales and revenues; adverse effects on production, capacity 
utilization, U.S. shipments, and employment; declines in financial 
performance; and capacity closures and conversions.\26\ We have 
assessed the allegations and supporting evidence regarding material 
injury, threat of material injury, and causation, and we have 
determined that these allegations are properly supported by adequate 
evidence and meet the statutory requirements for initiation.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ See Volume I of the Petition, at 17-28, Exhibit I-3, 
Exhibit I-6, and Exhibits I-11 through I-17.
    \27\ See CVD Initiation Checklist, at Attachment III, Analysis 
of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation for the 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Certain 
Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Initiation of CVD Investigation

    Based on the examination of the CVD Petition, we find that the 
Petition meets the requirements of section 702 of the Act. Therefore we 
are initiating a CVD investigation to determine whether imports of UGW 
paper from Canada benefit from countervailable subsidies conferred by 
the government of Canada. In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our 
preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the date of this 
initiation.
    Under the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, numerous 
amendments to the AD and CVD laws were made.\28\ The 2015 law does not 
specify dates of application for those amendments. On August 6, 2015, 
the Department published an interpretative rule, in which it announced 
the applicability dates for each amendment to the Act, except for 
amendments contained in section 771(7) of the Act, which relate to 
determinations of material injury by the ITC.\29\ The amendments to 
sections 776 and 782 of the Act are applicable to all determinations 
made on or after August 6, 2015, and, therefore, apply to this CVD 
investigation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law 
114-27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
    \29\ See Dates of Application of Amendments to the Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Laws Made by the Trade Preferences Extension 
Act of 2015, 80 FR 46793 (August 6, 2015) (Applicability Notice). 
The 2015 amendments may be found at https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1295/text/pl.
    \30\ See Applicability Notice, 80 FR at 46794-95.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 41606]]

Subsidy Allegations

    Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is 
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on 63 of the 65 
alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our decision 
to initiate, or not initiate, on each program, see the CVD Initiation 
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this 
investigation is available on ACCESS.
    In accordance with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we will make our preliminary 
determination no later than 65 days after the date of this initiation.

Respondent Selection

    The petitioner named seven companies as producers/exporters of UGW 
paper in Canada.\31\ Following standard practice in CVD investigations, 
in the event the Department determines that the number of companies is 
large, the Department intends to review U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of UGW paper during the POI 
under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
subheadings, and if it determines that it cannot individually examine 
each company based upon the Department's resources, then the Department 
will select respondents based on those data. We intend to release CBP 
data under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties with 
access to information protected by APO within five business days of the 
announcement of the initiation of this investigation. Interested 
parties must submit applications for disclosure under APO in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such applications may 
be found on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/apo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Volume I of the Petition at Exhibit I-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested parties may submit comments regarding the CBP data and 
respondent selection by 5:00 p.m. ET three calendar days after 
publication. The Department will not accept rebuttal comments regarding 
the CBP data or respondent selection.
    Comments must be filed electronically using ACCESS. An 
electronically filed document must be received successfully, in its 
entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m. ET on the date noted above. 
If respondent selection is necessary, within 20 days of publication of 
this notice, we intend to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection based upon comments received from interested parties and our 
analysis of the record information.

Distribution of Copies of the Petition

    In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.202(f), copies of the public version of the Petition have been 
provided to the GOC via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, we will 
attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to each 
exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR 351.203(c)(2).

ITC Notification

    We will notify the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 
702(d) of the Act.

Preliminary Determination by the ITC

    The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date 
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable 
indication that imports of UGW paper from Canada are materially 
injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry. A 
negative ITC determination will result in the investigation being 
terminated.\32\ Otherwise, this investigation will proceed according to 
statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ See section 733(a) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Submission of Factual Information

    Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) 
Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence 
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available 
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the 
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence 
placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than 
factual information described in (i)-(iv). 19 CFR 351.301(b) requires 
any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which 
subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted 
\33\ and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct 
factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation 
identifying the information already on the record that the factual 
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.\34\ Time limits for 
the submission of factual information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, 
which provides specific time limits based on the type of factual 
information being submitted. Interested parties should review the 
regulations prior to submitting factual information in this 
investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
    \34\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extensions of Time Limits

    Parties may request an extension of time limits before the 
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as 
otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request 
will be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the 
time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301 expires. For submissions 
that are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request 
will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the 
due date. Under certain circumstances, we may elect to specify a 
different time limit by which extension requests will be considered 
untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties 
simultaneously. In such a case, we will inform parties in the letter or 
memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by 
which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. An 
extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission; 
under limited circumstances we will grant untimely-filed requests for 
the extension of time limits. Parties should review Extension of Time 
Limits; Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at 
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior 
to submitting factual information in this investigation.

Certification Requirements

    Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding 
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\35\ 
Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are 
in effect for company/government officials, as well as their 
representatives. Investigations initiated on the basis of petitions 
filed on or after August 16, 2013, and other segments of any AD or CVD 
proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the 
formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final 
Rule.\36\ The Department intends to reject factual submissions if the 
submitting party does not comply with the applicable revised 
certification requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \36\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also 
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at 
http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On

[[Page 41607]]

January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO 
Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Parties wishing to 
participate in this investigation should ensure that they meet the 
requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of letters of 
appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)).
    This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702(c)(2) 
and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.203(c).

    Dated: August 29, 2017.
Gary Taverman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

Scope of the Investigation

    The merchandise covered by this investigation includes certain 
paper that has not been coated on either side and with 50 percent or 
more of the cellulose fiber content consisting of groundwood pulp, 
including groundwood pulp made from recycled paper, weighing not 
more than 90 grams per square meter. Groundwood pulp includes all 
forms of pulp produced from a mechanical pulping process, such as 
thermo-mechanical process (TMP), chemi-thermo mechanical process 
(CTMP), bleached chemi-thermo mechanical process (BCTMP) or any 
other mechanical pulping process. The scope includes paper shipped 
in any form, including but not limited to both rolls and sheets.
    Certain uncoated groundwood paper includes but is not limited to 
standard newsprint, high bright newsprint, book publishing, 
directory, and printing and writing papers. The scope includes paper 
that is white, off-white, cream, or colored.
    Specifically excluded from the scope are imports of certain 
uncoated groundwood paper printed with final content of printed text 
or graphic. Also excluded are papers that otherwise meet this 
definition, but which have undergone a supercalendering process.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ Supercalendering imparts a glossy finish produced by the 
movement of the paper web through a supercalender which is a stack 
of alternating rollers of metal and cotton (or other softer 
material). The supercalender runs at high speed and applies 
pressure, heat, and friction which glazes the surface of the paper, 
imparting gloss to the surface and increasing the paper's smoothness 
and density.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Certain uncoated groundwood paper is classifiable in the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) in several 
subheadings, including 4801.00.0120, 4801.00.0140, 4802.61.1000, 
4802.61.2000, 4802.61.3110, 4802.61.3191, 4802.61.6040, 
4802.62.1000, 4802.62.2000, 4802.62.3000, 4802.62.6140, 
4802.69.1000, 4802.69.2000, and 4802.69.3000. Subject merchandise 
may also be imported under several additional subheadings including 
4805.91.5000, 4805.91.7000, and 4805.91.9000. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise is dispositive.

[FR Doc. 2017-18727 Filed 8-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P