[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28200-28204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12804]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80933; File No. SR-NYSE-2017-30]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Section 102.01B of 
the NYSE Listed Company Manual To Provide for the Listing of Companies 
That List Without a Prior Exchange Act Registration and That Are Not 
Listing in Connection With an Underwritten Initial Public Offering and 
Related Changes to Rules 15, 104, and 123D

June 15, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on June 13, 2017, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or 
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I 
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend: (i) Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B 
of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the ``Manual'') to modify the 
provisions relating to the qualification of companies listing without a 
prior Exchange Act registration; (ii) Rule 15 to add a Reference Price 
for when a security is listed under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B; 
(iii) Rule 104 to specify DMM requirements when a security is listed 
under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B and there has been no trading in 
the private market for such security; and (iv) Rule 123D to specify 
that the Exchange may declare a regulatory halt in a security that is 
the subject of an initial public offering (``IPO'') or initial listing 
on the Exchange. The proposed rule change is available on the 
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend: (i) Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B 
of the Manual to modify the provisions relating to the qualification of 
companies listing without a prior Exchange Act registration; (ii) Rule 
15 to add a Reference Price for when a security is listed under 
Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B; (iii) Rule 104 to specify DMM 
requirements when a security is listed under Footnote (E) to Section 
102.10B and there has been no trading in the private market for such 
security; and (iv) Rule 123D to specify that the Exchange may declare a 
regulatory halt in a security that is the subject of an IPO or initial 
listing on the Exchange
Amendments to Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B
    Generally, the Exchange expects to list companies in connection 
with a firm commitment underwritten IPO, upon transfer from another 
market, or pursuant to a spin-off. Companies listing in connection with 
an IPO must demonstrate that they have $40 million in market value of 
publicly-held shares,\4\ while companies that are listing upon transfer 
from another exchange or the over-the counter market or pursuant to a 
spin-off must demonstrate that they have $100 million in market value 
of publicly-held shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Shares held by directors, officers, or their immediate 
families and other concentrated holdings of 10 percent or more are 
excluded in calculating the number of publicly-held shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 102.01B currently contains a provision under which the 
Exchange recognizes that some companies that have not previously had 
their common equity securities registered under the Exchange Act, but 
which have sold common equity securities in a private placement, may 
wish to list their common equity securities on the Exchange at the time 
of effectiveness of a registration statement filed solely for the 
purpose of allowing existing shareholders to sell their shares. 
Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B provides that the Exchange will, on a 
case by case basis, exercise discretion to list such companies. In 
exercising this discretion, Footnote (E) provides that the Exchange 
will determine that such company has met the $100 million aggregate 
market value of publicly-held shares requirement based on a combination 
of both (i) an independent third-party valuation (a ``Valuation'') of 
the company and (ii) the most recent trading price for the company's 
common stock in a trading system for unregistered securities operated 
by a national securities exchange or a registered broker-dealer (a 
``Private Placement Market''). The Exchange will attribute a market 
value of publicly-held shares to the company equal to the lesser of (i) 
the value calculable based on the Valuation and (ii) the value 
calculable based on the most recent trading price in a Private 
Placement Market.
    Any Valuation used for purposes of Footnote (E) must be provided by 
an entity that has significant experience and demonstrable competence 
in the provision of such valuations. The Valuation must be of a recent 
date as of the time of the approval of the company for listing and the 
evaluator must have considered, among other factors, the annual 
financial statements required to be included in the registration 
statement, along with financial statements for any completed fiscal 
quarters subsequent to the end of the

[[Page 28201]]

last year of audited financials included in the registration statement. 
The Exchange will consider any market factors or factors particular to 
the listing applicant that would cause concern that the value of the 
company had diminished since the date of the Valuation and will 
continue to monitor the company and the appropriateness of relying on 
the Valuation up to the time of listing. In particular, the Exchange 
will examine the trading price trends for the stock in the Private 
Placement Market over a period of several months prior to listing and 
will only rely on a Private Placement Market price if it is consistent 
with a sustained history over that several month period evidencing a 
market value in excess of the Exchange's market value requirement. The 
Exchange may withdraw its approval of the listing at any time prior to 
the listing date if it believes that the Valuation no longer accurately 
reflects the company's likely market value.
    While Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B provides for a company 
listing upon effectiveness of a selling shareholder registration 
statement, it does not make any provision for a company listing in 
connection with the effectiveness of an Exchange Act registration 
statement in the absence of an IPO or other Securities Act 
registration. A company is able to become an Exchange Act registrant 
without a concurrent public offering by filing a Form 10 (or, in the 
case of a foreign private issuer, a Form 20-F) with the SEC. The 
Exchange believes that it is appropriate to list companies that wish to 
list immediately upon effectiveness of an Exchange Act registration 
statement without a concurrent Securities Act registration provided the 
applicable company meets all other listing requirements. Consequently, 
the Exchange proposes to amend Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B to 
explicitly provide that it applies to companies listing upon 
effectiveness of an Exchange Act registration statement without a 
concurrent Securities Act registration as well as to companies listing 
upon effectiveness of a selling shareholder registration statement.
    The Exchange notes that the requirement of Footnote (E) that the 
Exchange should rely on recent Private Placement Market trading in 
addition to a Valuation may cause difficulties for certain companies 
that are otherwise clearly qualified for listing. Some companies that 
are clearly large enough to be suitable for listing on the Exchange do 
not have their securities traded at all on a Private Placement Market 
prior to going public. In other cases, the Private Placement Market 
trading is too limited to provide a reasonable basis for reaching 
conclusions about a company's qualification. Consequently, the Exchange 
proposes to amend Footnote (E) to provide an exception to the Private 
Placement Market trading requirement for companies with respect to 
which there is a recent Valuation available indicating at least $250 
million in market value of publicly-held shares. Adopting a requirement 
that the Valuation must be at least two-and-a-half times the $100 
million requirement will give a significant degree of comfort that the 
market value of the company's shares will meet the standard upon 
commencement of trading on the Exchange. The Exchange notes that it is 
unlikely that any Valuation would reach a conclusion that was incorrect 
to the degree necessary for a company using this provision to fail to 
meet the $100 million requirement upon listing, in particular because 
any Valuation used for this purpose must be provided by an entity that 
has significant experience and demonstrable competence in the provision 
of such valuations.
    The Exchange proposes to further amend Footnote (E) by providing 
that a valuation agent will not be deemed to be independent if:
     At the time it provides such valuation, the valuation 
agent or any affiliated person or persons beneficially own in the 
aggregate as of the date of the valuation, more than 5% of the class of 
securities to be listed, including any right to receive any such 
securities exercisable within 60 days.
     The valuation agent or any affiliated entity has provided 
any investment banking services to the listing applicant within the 12 
months preceding the date of the valuation. For purposes of this 
provision, ``investment banking services'' includes, without 
limitation, acting as an underwriter in an offering for the issuer; 
acting as a financial adviser in a merger or acquisition; providing 
venture capital, equity lines of credit, PIPEs (private investment, 
public equity transactions), or similar investments; serving as 
placement agent for the issuer; or acting as a member of a selling 
group in a securities underwriting.
     The valuation agent or any affiliated entity has been 
engaged to provide investment banking services to the listing applicant 
in connection with the proposed listing or any related financings or 
other related transactions.
    The Exchange believes that this proposed new requirement will 
provide a significant additional guarantee of the independence of any 
entity providing a Valuation for purposes of Footnote (E).
    The proposed amendments would enable the Exchange to compete for 
listings of companies that the Exchange believes would be able to list 
on the Nasdaq Stock Market (``Nasdaq'') but would not be able to list 
on the NYSE under its current rules. Nasdaq's initial listing rules do 
not explicitly address how Nasdaq determines compliance with its 
initial listing market capitalization requirements by private companies 
seeking to list upon effectiveness of a selling shareholder 
registration statement or Exchange Act registration without a 
concurrent underwritten public offering. However, over an extended 
period of time Nasdaq has listed a number of previously private 
companies in conjunction with the effectiveness of a selling 
shareholder registration statement without an underwritten offering. In 
light of this precedent and the absence of any Nasdaq rule provision 
explicitly limiting the ability of a company to qualify for listing 
without a public offering or prior public market price, the Exchange 
believes that Nasdaq would take the position that it could also list a 
previously private company upon effectiveness of an Exchange Act 
registration statement without a concurrent public offering. Therefore, 
the Exchange believes that its proposed amendment would permit it to 
compete on equal terms with Nasdaq for the listing of companies seeking 
to list in either of these circumstances.
    The Exchange believes that it is important to have a transparent 
and consistent approach to determining compliance with applicable 
market capitalization requirements by previously private companies 
seeking to list without a public offering and that Footnote (E) to 
Section 102.01B as amended would provide such a mechanism. In the 
absence of the proposed amendments, companies listing upon 
effectiveness of an Exchange Act registration statement would have no 
means of listing on the NYSE, while the Exchange believes that Nasdaq 
would interpret its own rules as enabling it to list a company under 
those circumstances. As such, the proposed amendment would address a 
significant competitive disadvantage faced by the NYSE, while also 
providing certain companies with an alternative listing venue where 
none currently exists.
Proposed Amendments to NYSE Rules
    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules governing the opening of 
trading to specify procedures for the opening trade on the day of 
initial listing of a company that lists under the amended provisions of 
Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual and that did not

[[Page 28202]]

have any recent trading in a Private Placement Market before listing on 
the Exchange.\5\ The Exchange proposes that the issuer must retain a 
financial advisor to provide specified functions, as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For purposes of the proposed provision, the Exchange would 
generally require an issuer to have a financial advisor if there had 
been no trades on a Private Placement Market within 90 days of the 
date of listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 15
    Rule 15(b) provides that a designated market maker (``DMM'') will 
publish a pre-opening indication either (i) before a security opens if 
the opening transaction on the Exchange is anticipated to be at a price 
that represents a change of more than the ``Applicable Price Range,'' 
as specified in Rule 15(d), from a specified ``Reference Price,'' as 
specified in Rule 15(c), or (ii) if a security has not opened by 10:00 
a.m. Eastern Time. Rule 15(c)(1) specifies the Reference Price for a 
security other than an American Depository Receipt, which would be 
either (A) the security's last reported sale price on the Exchange; (B) 
the security's offering price in the case of an IPO; or (C) the 
security's last reported sale price on the securities market from which 
the security is being transferred to the Exchange, on the security's 
first day of trading on the Exchange.
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 15(c)(1) to add new sub-
paragraph (D) to specify the Reference Price for a security that is 
listed under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual. As 
proposed, the Reference Price in such scenario would be the most recent 
transaction price in a Private Placement Market or, if none, a price 
determined by the Exchange in consultation with a financial advisor to 
the issuer of such security.
Rule 104
    Rule 104(a)(2) provides that the DMM has a responsibility for 
facilitating openings and reopenings for each of the securities in 
which the DMM is registered as required under Exchange rules, which 
includes supplying liquidity as needed.\6\ The Exchange proposes to 
amend Rule 104(a)(2) to specify the role of a financial adviser to an 
issuer that is listing under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the 
Manual and that has not had any recent trading in a Private Placement 
Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Rules 15, 115A, and 123D specify the procedures for opening 
securities on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described above, an issuer that seeks to list under Footnote (E) 
to Section 102.01B and that does not have any recent Private Market 
Placement trading would be required to have a financial advisor in 
connection with such listing. The Exchange proposes that the DMM would 
be required to consult with such financial advisor when facilitating 
the open of trading of the first day of trading of such listing. This 
requirement is based in part on Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(9), which requires 
that a new listing on Nasdaq that is not an IPO have a financial 
advisor willing to perform the functions performed by an underwriter in 
connection with pricing an IPO on Nasdaq.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Nasdaq operates an automated IPO opening process, which is 
described in Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(8). In contrast to the NYSE, which 
has DMMs to facilitate the opening of trading, for an IPO, Nasdaq 
requires that the underwriter of the IPO perform specified 
functions, including (i) notifying Nasdaq that the security is ready 
to trade; (ii) determining whether an IPO should be postponed; and 
(iii) selecting price bands for purposes of applying Nasdaq's 
automated price validation test. Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(9) requires 
that if a new listing does not have an underwriter, the issuer must 
have a financial advisor willing to perform the above-described 
functions. The functions that the underwriter/financial advisor 
performs on Nasdaq as described in Rule 4120(c)(8) are not 
applicable to the Exchange. The Exchange opening process does not 
have a concept of ``price bands'' because, as described in Rule 
115A, market orders and limit orders priced better than the opening 
price are guaranteed to participate in the IPO opening. In addition, 
because the Exchange does not conduct an automated opening process, 
the DMM functions as an independent financial expert responsible for 
facilitating the opening of trading to ensure a fair and orderly 
opening.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that such a financial advisor would have an 
understanding of the status of ownership of outstanding shares in the 
company and would have been working with the issuer to identify a 
market for the securities upon listing. Such financial advisor would be 
able to provide input to the DMM regarding expectations of where such a 
new listing should be priced, based on pre-listing selling and buying 
interest and other factors that would not be available to the DMM 
through other sources.
    To effect this change, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 
104(a)(3) to provide that when facilitating the opening of a security 
that is listed under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual and 
that has not had any recent trading in a Private Placement Market, the 
DMM would be required to consult with a financial advisor to the issuer 
of such security in order to effect a fair and orderly opening of such 
security.
    Notwithstanding the proposed obligation to consult with the 
financial advisor, the DMM would remain responsible for facilitating 
the opening of trading of such security, and the opening of such 
security must take into consideration the buy and sell orders available 
on the Exchange's book in connection. Accordingly, just as a DMM is not 
bound by an offering price in an IPO, and will open such a security at 
a price dictated by the buying and selling interest entered on the 
Exchange in that security, a DMM would not be bound by the input he or 
she receives from the financial advisor.
Rule 123D
    The Exchange further proposes to amend its rules to provide 
authority to declare a regulatory halt for a new listing. As proposed, 
Rule 123D(d) would provide that the Exchange may declare a regulatory 
halt in a security that is the subject of: (1) An initial public 
offering on the Exchange; or (2) an initial pricing on the Exchange of 
a security that has not been listed on a national securities exchange 
or traded in the over-the-counter market pursuant to FINRA Form 211 
(``OTC market'') immediately prior to the initial pricing.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange proposes to re-number current Rule 123D(d) as 
Rule 123D(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 123D(d)(1) is based on Nasdaq Rule 4120(a)(7), which 
provides that Nasdaq may halt trading in a security that is the subject 
of an IPO on Nasdaq.
    Proposed Rule 123D(d)(2) is based in part on Nasdaq Rule 
4120(c)(9), which provides that the process for halting and initial 
pricing of a security that is the subject of an IPO on Nasdaq is also 
available for the initial pricing of any other security that has not 
been listed on a national securities exchange or traded in the OTC 
market immediately prior to the initial public offering, provided that 
a broker-dealer serving in the role of financial advisor to the issuer 
of the securities being listed is willing to perform the functions 
under Rule 4120(c)(7)(B) that areperformed by an underwriter with 
respect to an initial public offering.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange believes that the correct cross reference 
should be to Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(8)(B). Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(8) 
specifies Nasdaq procedures for how it conducts its crossing trade 
following a trading halt declared for an IPO on Nasdaq, including 
the role of an underwriter in determining when an IPO may be 
released for trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 123D(d)(2) would provide authority for the Exchange 
to declare a regulatory halt for a security that is having its initial 
listing on the Exchange, is not an IPO, and has not been listed on a 
national securities exchange or traded in the OTC market immediately 
prior to the initial pricing (``non-IPO listing''). The Exchange does 
not propose to include the last clause of Nasdaq Rule 4120(c)(9) in 
proposed Rule 123D(d)(2). Rather, as described above, the Exchange 
proposes to address the role of a financial advisor to an

[[Page 28203]]

issuer in specified circumstances in Rule 104(a)(3).
    The Exchange believes that it would be consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest for the Exchange, as a 
primary listing exchange, to have to authority to declare a regulatory 
halt for security that is the subject of an IPO or a non-IPO listing. 
For example, the Exchange believes that it would be consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest for the Exchange to 
have the authority to declare a regulatory halt if there is a systems 
or technology issue in connection with the opening IPO transaction.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) \10\ of the Act, in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ in particular in that it 
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to 
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and 
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market 
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest 
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers. The proposed rule change would foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in clearing and 
settling transactions in securities, thereby facilitating such 
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal to permit companies listing upon effectiveness of an 
Exchange Act registration statement without a concurrent public 
offering or Securities Act registration is designed to protect 
investors and the public interest, because such companies will be 
required to meet all of the same quantitative requirements met by other 
listing applicants. The proposal to amend Footnote (E) to Section 
102.01B of the Manual to allow companies to avail themselves of that 
provision without any reliance on Private Placement Market trading is 
designed to protect investors and the public interest because any 
company relying solely on a valuation to demonstrate compliance with 
the market value of publicly-held shares requirement will be required 
to demonstrate a market value of publicly-held shares of $250 million, 
rather than the $100 million that is generally applicable. The proposal 
to include a definition of valuation agent independence in Footnote (E) 
is consistent with the protection of investors, as it ensures that any 
entity providing a Valuation for purposes of Footnote (E) will have a 
significant level of independence from the listing applicant.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to Rules 15 and 
104 would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and 
open market and a national market system because the proposed rule 
changes would specify requirements relating to the opening of a trading 
of a security that would be listed under the proposed amended text of 
Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual. The proposed amendments 
to Exchange rules are designed to provide DMMs with information to 
assist them in meeting their obligations to open a new listing under 
the amended provisions of the Manual. Rule 15 would be amended to 
specify the Reference Price that the DMM would use for purposes of 
determining whether a pre-opening indication is required and Rule 104 
would be amended to provide that the DMM will consult with a financial 
advisor when facilitating the opening of a security that is listed 
under Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual and that has not 
had any recent trading in a Private Placement Market.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to Rule 123D to 
provide authority to declare a regulatory halt in a security subject to 
an IPO on non-IPO listing would remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system 
because it would provide the Exchange with authority to halt trading 
across all markets for a security that has not previously listed on the 
Exchange, but for which a regulatory halt would promote fair and 
orderly markets. The proposed rule change would also align halt rule 
authority among primary listing exchanges. The Exchange further 
believes that having the authority to declare a regulatory halt for a 
security that is the subject of an IPO or non-IPO listing is consistent 
with the protection of investors and the public interest and would 
promote fair and orderly markets by helping to protect against 
volatility in pricing and initial trading of unseasoned securities.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed amendment to 
Footnote (E) to Section 102.01B of the Manual will impose any burden on 
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the 
purpose of the Exchange Act. Rather, the proposed rule change will 
increase competition for new listings by enabling companies to list 
that meet all quantitative requirements but are currently unable to 
list because of the methodology required by the current rules to 
demonstrate their compliance.
    As noted above, Nasdaq's listing rules do not include explicit 
limitations applicable to the listing of companies in these 
circumstances. Additionally, Nasdaq has listed previously private 
companies upon effectiveness of a selling shareholder registration 
statement without a concurrent underwritten offering on several 
occasions in the past. In light of this precedent and the absence of 
any Nasdaq rule provision explicitly limiting the ability of a company 
to qualify for listing without a public offering or prior public market 
price, the Exchange believes that Nasdaq would take the position that 
it could also list a previously private company upon effectiveness of 
an Exchange Act registration statement without a concurrent public 
offering. As such, the proposed amendment to Footnote (E) to Section 
102.01B of the Manual would increase competition by enabling the NYSE 
to compete with Nasdaq for these listings.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed amendments to its 
Rule Book will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary 
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. 
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the changes are not related to 
competition, but rather are designed to promote fair and orderly 
markets in a manner that is consistent with the protection of investors 
and the public interest. The proposed changes do not impact the ability 
of any market participant or trading venue to compete.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate 
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate

[[Page 28204]]

and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2017-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2017-30. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2017-30 and should be 
submitted on or before July 11, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-12804 Filed 6-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P