[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 27723]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 337-TA-565/946]


Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof; Institution of an 
Advisory Opinion Proceeding

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to institute an advisory opinion proceeding 
in the above-captioned investigations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
565 on March 23, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Epson Portland, 
Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon, Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, 
California, and Seiko Epson Corporation of Nagano-Ken, Japan 
(collectively, ``Epson''). 71 FR 14720 (Mar. 23, 2006). The complaint 
alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,615,957; 5,622,439; 5,158,377; 5,221,148; 5,156,472; 
5,488,401; 6,502,917; 6,550,902; 6,955,422; 7,008,053; and 7,011,397. 
The Commission's notice of investigation named 24 respondents including 
Ninestar Technology Company Ltd. of Montclair, California 
(``Ninestar''). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations participated 
in the investigation. Several respondents were terminated from the 
investigation on the basis of settlement agreements or consent orders 
or were found in default. On October 19, 2007, the Commission issued a 
general exclusion order (``GEO'') and a limited exclusion order. The 
Commission also issued cease and desist orders (``CDO'') directed to 
several domestic respondents.
    The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-946 on January 27, 2015, 
based on a complaint filed by Epson. 80 FR 4314-16 (Jan. 27, 2015). 
That complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of infringement of certain 
claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,366,233; 8,454,116; 8,794,749; 8,801,163; 
and 8,882,513. The Commission's notice of investigation named numerous 
respondents. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations participated in 
the investigation. All the participating respondents were terminated 
from the investigation as a result of settlement agreements and/or 
consent motion stipulations. A number of the named respondents 
defaulted. On October 28, 2015, the presiding administrative law judge 
(ALJ) issued an initial determination granting Epson's motion for 
summary determination of violation of section 337 by the defaulting 
respondents. Based on evidence of a pattern of violation and difficulty 
ascertaining the source of the infringing products, the Commission 
issued a GEO and CDOs directed to two defaulted domestic respondents on 
May 26, 2016.
    On April 26, 2017, Ninestar, Ninestar Image Tech. Ltd., and Apex 
Microtech Ltd. (collectively, ``Requesters'') filed a request for a 
consolidated advisory opinion proceeding in both investigations 
pursuant to Commission Rule 210.79 (19 CFR 210.79). Specifically, 
Requesters seek an advisory opinion that will declare that their 
refurbished Epson ink cartridges remanufactured using empty Epson ink 
cartridges collected from the United States are outside the scope of 
the GEOs and CDOs issued in both investigations. Requesters also ask 
that the advisory opinion proceeding be conducted in an expedited 
manner pursuant to Commission Rule 210.2 (19 CFR 210.2), without a 
formal hearing or discovery. Epson filed a timely response opposing the 
request. Thereafter, Requesters filed a motion for leave to file a 
reply to Epson's response.
    The Commission has determined that the request complies with the 
requirements for institution of an advisory opinion proceeding under 
Commission Rule 210.79. Accordingly, the Commission has determined to 
institute a consolidated advisory opinion proceeding in both 
investigations and referred the request to the Chief ALJ to designate a 
presiding ALJ. Epson, the Requesters, and the Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations are named as parties to the proceeding. The Commission 
has also determined to deny Requesters' motion for leave to file a 
reply.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued June 12, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-12487 Filed 6-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P