[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 106 (Monday, June 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25766-25770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11561]



[[Page 25766]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-970]


Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final 
Determination of No Shipments, and Final Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 27, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of the fourth 
administrative review (AR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on 
multilayered wood flooring (MLWF) from the People's Republic of China 
(PRC). The period of review (POR) for the AR is December 1, 2014, 
through November 30, 2015. The AR covers 111 companies. The review 
covers two mandatory respondents, Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., 
Ltd. (Penghong) and Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 
(Senmao). We received comments from interested parties on our 
Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we 
made changes to the margin calculations for the Final Results of this 
administrative review. The final dumping margins are listed below in 
the ``Final Results'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective June 5, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Horn or Aleksandras Nakutis, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement & Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2615, and (202) 482-
3147, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 27, 2016, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the preliminary results of the 2014-2015 administrative review 
of the antidumping duty order on wood flooring from the PRC.\1\ On 
January 26, 2017, the Department received case briefs from multiple 
interested parties.\2\ Additionally, on January 26, 2017, we received 
from Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. a letter in lieu of case brief. On 
February 6, 2017, the Department received rebuttal briefs from Fine 
Furniture, Old Master Products Inc. (Old Master), Senmao and the HB 
Respondents, and CAHP. Also, on January 26, 2017, the Department 
received requests for a hearing from CAHP and Penghong. All parties 
later withdrew their requests for a hearing.\3\ On March 31, 2017, we 
extended the time period for issuing the Final Results of this review 
by 30 days, until May 26, 2017.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and Preliminary 
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-
2015, 81 FR 95114 (December 27, 2016) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to 
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, regarding ``Issue and Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Results of the 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China,'' 
(Issue and Decision Memorandum), issued and dated concurrently with 
this notice.
    \3\ Penghong and DH Respondents letter to the file re: 
``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China--
Withdrawal of Hearing Request'' dated March 7, 2017 and CAHP letter 
to the file re: ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's 
Republic of China'' dated March 7, 2017.
    \4\ Memo to the file re: ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated March 31, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the order includes MLWF, subject to 
certain exceptions.\5\ Imports of the subject merchandise are provided 
for under the following subheadings of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTSUS): 4412.31.0520; 4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 
4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.3175; 4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 
4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 4412.31.5125; 
4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.5175; 4412.31.6000; 
4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; 
4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 4412.32.2530; 
4412.32.3125; 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 
4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 4412.39.4011; 
4412.39.4012; 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 
4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 
4412.39.4069; 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 
4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 
4412.94.3141; 4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 
4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 4412.94.9500; 
4412.99.0600; 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 
4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 
4412.99.3170; 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; 
4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 
4412.99.9500; 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; 
and 9801.00.2500.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to 
Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, regarding ``Issue and Decision Memorandum for the Final 
Results of the 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China,'' 
(Issue and Decision Memorandum), issued and dated concurrently with 
this notice, for a complete description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs 
purposes, the written description of the subject merchandise is 
dispositive.

Methodology

    The Department has conducted this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export 
prices and constructed export prices have been calculated in accordance 
with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy 
(NME) within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, normal value 
(NV) has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, please see Issues and Decision Memorandum, hereby adopted 
by this notice.\6\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is also available 
in the Central Records Unit,

[[Page 25767]]

Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed 
Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A list of topics discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, we found that nine companies had no 
shipments during the POR.\7\ Power Dekor submitted comments stating the 
Department made an inadvertent error in the Preliminary Results by not 
recognizing Power Dekor's timely filed no-shipment letter.\8\ We have 
reviewed Power Dekor's comments and no-shipment letter and have found 
that Power Dekor had no shipments during this POR.\9\ Therefore, for 
these Final Results, we find that a total of ten companies had no 
shipments during the POR.\10\ Consistent with our ``automatic 
assessment'' clarification, we will issue appropriate instructions with 
respect to these companies to CBP based on our Final Results.\11\ In 
addition, as discussed below, these companies will maintain their rate 
from the most recent segment in which they participated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Preliminary Results.
    \8\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from People's Republic of 
China: Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd.'s Letter in Lieu of Case Brief 
(January 26, 2017), at 2.
    \9\ See Issues and Decisions Memorandum dated concurrently with 
this notice at comment 4.
    \10\ Changbai Mountain Development and Protection Zone Hongtu 
Wood Industrial Co., Ltd.; Dalian Xinjinghua Wood Co., Ltd.; 
Guangzhou Homebon Timber Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Henan Xingwangjia 
Technology Co., Ltd.; Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., Ltd.; 
Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd.; Shenyang Senwang Wooden Industry Co., 
Ltd.; Xuzhou Antop International Trade Co., Ltd.; Yekalon Industry 
Inc.; and Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material Technology Co., Ltd.
    \11\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment of 
Antidumping Duties); see also the ``Assessment'' section of this 
notice, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

     We granted Power Dekor no shipment status during the 
POR.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comment 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We assigned a separate rate to the Fusong Jinlong Group, 
which includes all four members of the group: Fusong Jinlong Wooden 
Group Co., Ltd., Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., Dalian 
Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., and Fusong Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., 
Ltd.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at comment 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We revised the calculation of the surrogate value for 
water in Penghong's margin program by converting MT to KG before 
applying the water surrogate value to the reported water 
consumption.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Memorandum to the File from William Horn, International 
Trade Compliance Analyst, ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results Margin 
Calculation for Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd.,'' dated 
concurrently with this determination (Penghong Final Analysis 
Memorandum), at page 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We added the value of free of charge inputs to Penghong's 
calculation of export price as applicable.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Id., at page 2 and Exhibit 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We corrected the surrogate values for red oak, jatoba, 
plastic strip, and overlaying glue that are applicable for Senmao; that 
were inadvertently assigned incorrect surrogate values in the 
Preliminary Results.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Memorandum to the File from Aleksandras Nakutis, 
International Trade Compliance Analyst, ``Multilayered Wood Flooring 
from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results 
Margin Calculation for Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., 
Ltd.,'' dated concurrently with this determination (Senmao Final 
Analysis Memorandum), at page 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We revised the surrogate value for plywood for Senmao to 
reflect Romanian Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) 441232 rather than 
using a simple average of Romanian HTS 44123210 and 44123190.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Id., at page 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    The Department determines that twenty companies subject to this 
review did not establish eligibility for a separate rate. As such, we 
determine they are part of the PRC-wide entity.\18\ Because no party 
requested a review of the PRC-wide entity and the Department no longer 
considers the PRC-wide entity as an exporter conditionally subject to 
administrative reviews,\19\ we did not conduct a review of the PRC-wide 
entity. Thus, the rate for the PRC-wide entity is not subject to change 
as a result of this review. For companies subject to this review that 
have established their entitlement to a separate rate the Department 
calculated a separate rate based on the expected method according to 
735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. For further discussion see accompanying Issues 
and Decisions Memorandum at comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The following companies were named in the Initiation of 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 
6832, 6835-37 (February 9, 2016) (First Initiation Notice) and 81 FR 
11179, 11182 (March 3, 2016) (Second Initiation Notice), but did not 
submit a certification of no shipment, separate rate application or 
separate rate certification, or otherwise establish eligibility for 
a separate rate; therefore they are part of the PRC-wide entity: 
Anhui Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.; Baiying Furniture Manufacturer 
Co., Ltd.; Cheng Hang Wood Co., Ltd.; HaiLin XinCheng Wooden 
Products, Ltd.; Hangzhou Dazhuang Floor Co., Ltd (dba Dasso 
Industrial Group Co., Ltd).; Hangzhou Huahi Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; 
Huber Engineering Wood Corp.; Huzhou City Nanxun Guangda Wood Co., 
Ltd.; Huzhou Fuma Wood Co., Ltd.; Jiafeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.; 
Qingdao Barry Flooring Co., Ltd.; Shandong Kaiyuan Wood Industry 
Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Anxin (Weiguang) Timber Co., Ltd.; Shanghai 
Eswell Timber Co., Ltd.; Shanghai New Sihe Wood Co., Ltd.; Shanghai 
Shenlin Corporation; Vicwood Industry (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.; Yixing 
Lion-King Timber Industry; Zhejiang AnJi XinFeng Bamboo & Wood 
Industry Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Desheng Wood Industry Co., Ltd.; and 
Zhejiang Haoyun Wooden Co., Ltd.
    \19\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in 
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty 
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963, 65969-70 (November 
4, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For companies subject to this review that have established their 
eligibility for a separate rate, the Department determines that the 
following dumping margins exist for the POR from December 1, 2014, 
through November 30, 2015:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                        Exporter \20\                           dumping
                                                                margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./Dalian Shumaike            0.00
 Floor Manufacturing Co., Ltd...............................
Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry Co., Ltd............      * 0.23
A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Baishan Huafeng Wooden Product Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Benxi Wood Company..........................................        0.00
Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd.........................        0.00

[[Page 25768]]

 
Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Dalian Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd..........................        0.00
Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Dalian Jiuyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC........................        0.00
Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry Co., Ltd.................        0.00
Dun Hua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., Ltd...................        0.00
Dunhua City Wanrong Wood Industry Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., Ltd....................        0.00
Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited and Double F Limited \21\.        0.00
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd \22\...................        0.00
GTP International Ltd.......................................        0.00
Guangdong Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd....................        0.00
Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., Ltd.......................        0.00
Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., Ltd......................        0.00
HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Hangzhou Hanje Tec Co., Ltd.................................        0.00
Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry Co., Ltd................        0.00
Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc.........................        0.00
Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd..............................        0.00
Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd........................        0.00
Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd...................................        0.00
Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., Ltd.................        0.00
Jiangsu Kentier Wood Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd..............................        0.00
Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co., Ltd.......        0.00
Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd......................        0.00
Karly Wood Product Limited..................................        0.00
Kember Hardwood Flooring Inc................................        0.00
Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Kingman Floors Co., Ltd.....................................        0.00
Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd..................................        0.00
Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd \23\.............................        0.00
Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc...........................        0.00
MuDanJiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd..............        0.00
Puli Trading Limited........................................        0.00
Scholar Home (Shanghai) New Material Co., Ltd...............        0.00
Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd..........................        0.00
Sino-Maple (JiangSu) Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd.................................        0.00
Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export Co., Ltd................        0.00
Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd................................        0.00
Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood Industry Co., Ltd..............        0.00
Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd...............................        0.00
Zhejiang Dadongwu Green Home Wood Co., Ltd..................        0.00
Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., Ltd....................        0.00
Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd............................        0.00
Zhejiang Fuma Warm Technology Co., Ltd......................        0.00
Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., Ltd.....................        0.00
Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd.........................        0.00
Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd.............................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* De minimis.

Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an

[[Page 25769]]

administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested 
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. 
Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd. withdrew its respective request for an 
administrative review within 90 days of the date of publication of the 
Initiation Notice.\24\ Accordingly, the Department rescinded this 
review with respect to Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd., in accordance with 
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).\25\ The Department reviewed Jiangsu Keri Wood 
Co., Ltd. as part of its concurrent new shipper review and intends to 
issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the results therein.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The mandatory respondents for this review included Dalian 
Penghong Floor Products Co., Ltd./Dalian Shumaike Floor 
Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood Industry 
Co., Ltd.
    \21\ See Issues and Decisions Memorandum at comment 5.
    \22\ In prior reviews, the Department determined that the four 
affiliated companies that comprise the Fusong Jinlong Group, namely, 
Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group Co., Ltd., Fusong Qianqiu Wooden Product 
Co., Ltd., Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., and Fusong 
Jinqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd., are sufficiently interrelated that 
for antidumping analysis purposes they should be treated together, 
and should together be assigned the separate rate on a common basis. 
The Department has received no information to contradict this 
finding. Therefore, in these Final Results, the Department has 
applied the separate rate on a common basis to the four companies 
that comprise the Fusong Jinlong Group.
    \23\ On September 30, 2014, the Department determined that Linyi 
Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. is the successor-in-interest to Shanghai 
Lizhong Wood Products Co., Ltd./The Lizhong Wood Industry Limited 
Company of Shanghai. See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 
People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances 
Review, 79 FR 58740 (September 30, 2014). Because Shanghai Lizhong 
Wood Products Co., Ltd./The Lizhong Wood Industry Limited Company of 
Shanghai no longer exists as a legal entity, the rate is assigned to 
Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd.
    \24\ See Letter from Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd. to the 
Department regarding ``Withdrawing of Review Request'' dated 
February 22, 2016.
    \25\ See Preliminary Results.
    \26\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
New Shipper Reviews; 2014-2015, dated concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. and Huzhou 
Muyun Wood Co., Ltd., the Department has found each of these company's 
one sale during the POR to be a non-bona fide sale in a concurrent new 
shipper review (``NSR'').\27\ Because the sale subject to this 
administrative review is the same sale found to be a non-bona fide sale 
in the new shipper review, and there are no other reviewable sales by 
either company during the POR, we are rescinding this review with 
respect to Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. and Huzhou Muyun 
Wood Co., Ltd.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic 
of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2014-
2015, 81 FR 74393 (October 26, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\28\ The 
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 
after the publication date of these Final Results of review. In 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or 
customer-) specific assessment rates for the merchandise subject to 
this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the 
Department will calculate importer- (or customer)-specific assessment 
rates for merchandise subject to this review. In these Final Results, 
the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted 
in the Final Modification for Reviews.\29\ Where either the 
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or 
an importer- (or customer-) specific assessment rate is zero or de 
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries 
without regard to antidumping duties.\30\ We intend to instruct CBP to 
liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-
wide entity at the current rate for the PRC-wide entity (which, as 
noted above, is not subject to change in this review).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \29\ See Antidumping Proceeding Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) 
(Final Modification for Reviews).
    \30\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the Final 
Results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of 
antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the Final 
Results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, 
where applicable.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these Final Results of review for shipments of the 
subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by 
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above the 
cash deposit rate will be their respective rate established in the 
Final Results of this review, except if the rate is zero or de minimis 
(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then the cash deposit rate will be zero; 
(2) for previously investigated PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed 
above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) 
for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found 
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that 
for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that 
non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Disclosure

    The Department intends to disclose calculations performed for these 
Final Results to the parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order (APO)

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
APO of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of 
proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary 
information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or 
conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.

    Dated: May 26, 2017.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
5. Discussion of the Issues
    i. Comment 1: Surrogate country
    ii. Comment 2: SC Sigstrat is at a higher level of integration 
than Senmao and should be rejected
    iii. Comment 3: The Department must apply the ``expected 
method'' to assign

[[Page 25770]]

the separate rate in this review if both mandatory respondents earn 
de minimis rates
    iv. Comment 4: Consideration of Power Dekor's no shipment 
certification
    v. Comment 5: Inclusion of Fine Furniture's affiliate's name in 
customs instructions and Federal Register Notice
    vi. Comment 6: Treatment of Fusong Jinlong group as a single 
entity
    vii. Comment 7: Overstatement of water SV
    viii. Comment 8: Overstatement of NV or understatement of export 
price
    ix. Comment 9: The Department must correct the Jatoba and Red 
Oak surrogate values
    x. Comment 10: The Department should correct its valuation of 
Senmao's wood veneers
    xi. Comment 11: Glue surrogate value
    xii. Comment 12: Senmao's by product offset for wood scrap
    xiii. Comment 13: The Department should correct the surrogate 
value references for plastic strip and overlaying glue in Senmao's 
margin calculations
    xiv. Comment 14: Senmao's plywood surrogate value

[FR Doc. 2017-11561 Filed 6-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P