[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 60 (Thursday, March 30, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15615-15627]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06270]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Parts 1112 and 1234

[Docket No. CPSC-2015-0019


Safety Standard for Infant Bath Tubs

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, 
section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 
(CPSIA), requires the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission 
(Commission or CPSC) to promulgate consumer product safety standards 
for durable infant or toddler products. These standards are to be 
``substantially the same as'' applicable voluntary standards, or more 
stringent than the voluntary standard if the Commission concludes that 
more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of injury 
associated with the product. The Commission is issuing a safety 
standard for infant bath tubs in response to the direction of section 
104(b) of the CPSIA. In addition, the Commission is amending its 
regulations regarding third party conformity assessment bodies to 
include the mandatory standard for infant bath tubs in the list of 
notices of requirements (NORs) issued by the Commission.

DATES: This rule will become effective October 2, 2017. The 
incorporation by reference of the publication listed in this rule is 
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 2, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keysha Walker, Compliance Officer, 
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: 301-504-6820; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Statutory Authority

    The CPSIA was enacted on August 14, 2008. Section 104(b) of the 
CPSIA, part of the Danny Keysar Child Product Safety Notification Act, 
requires the Commission to: (1) Examine and assess the effectiveness of 
voluntary consumer product safety standards for durable infant or 
toddler products, in consultation with representatives of consumer 
groups, juvenile product manufacturers, and independent child product 
engineers and experts; and (2) promulgate consumer product safety 
standards for durable infant and toddler products. Standards issued 
under section 104 are to be ``substantially the same as'' the 
applicable voluntary standard or more stringent than the voluntary 
standard if the Commission concludes that more stringent requirements 
would further reduce the risk of injury associated with the product.
    The term ``durable infant or toddler product'' is defined in 
section 104(f)(1) of the CPSIA as ``a durable product intended for use, 
or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children under the 
age of 5 years.'' Section 104(f)(2) of the CPSIA lists examples of 
durable infant or toddler products, including products such as ``bath 
seats'' and ``infant carriers.'' Although section 104(f)(2) does not 
specifically identify infant bath tubs, the Commission has defined an 
infant bath tub as a ``durable infant or toddler product'' in the 
Commission's product registration card rule under CPSIA section 
104(d).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Requirements for Consumer Registration of Durable Infant or 
Toddler Products; Final Rule, 74 FR 68668, 68669 (Dec. 29, 2009); 16 
CFR 1130.2(a)(16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 14, 2015, the Commission issued a notice of proposed 
rulemaking (NPR) for infant bath tubs. 80 FR 48769. The NPR proposed to 
incorporate by reference the voluntary standard, ASTM F2670-13, 
Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath Tubs, with 
several modifications to strengthen the standard, as a mandatory 
consumer product safety rule. In this document, the Commission is 
issuing a mandatory consumer product safety standard for infant bath 
tubs. As required by section 104(b)(1)(A), the Commission consulted 
with manufacturers, retailers, trade organizations, laboratories, 
consumer advocacy groups, consultants, and the public to develop this 
proposed standard, largely through the ASTM process. Based on 
modifications to the voluntary standard since the NPR published, the 
final rule incorporates by reference the most recent voluntary 
standard, developed by ASTM International, ASTM F2670-17, without 
modification.
    Additionally, the final rule amends the list of NORs issued by the 
Commission in 16 CFR part 1112 to include the standard for infant bath 
tubs. Under section 14 of the CPSA, the Commission promulgated 16 CFR 
part 1112 to establish requirements for accreditation of third party 
conformity assessment bodies (or testing laboratories) to test for 
conformity with a children's product safety rule. Amending part 1112 
adds an NOR for the infant bath tub standard to the list of children's 
product safety rules.

II. Product Description

A. Definition of Infant Bath Tub

    Paragraph 3.1.2 of ASTM F2670-17 defines an ``infant bath tub'' as 
a ``tub, enclosure, or other similar product intended to hold water and 
be placed into an adult bath tub, sink, or on top of other surfaces to 
provide support or containment, or both, for an infant in a reclining, 
sitting, or standing position during bathing by a caregiver.'' 
Paragraph 1.1 of the voluntary standard specifically excludes 
``products commonly known as bath slings, typically made of fabric or 
mesh'' from the scope of the standard.
    Infant bath tubs within the scope of the final rule include 
products of various designs, such as ``bucket style'' tubs that support 
a child sitting upright, tubs with an inclined seat for infants too 
young to sit unsupported, inflatable tubs, folding tubs, and tubs with 
spa features, such as handheld shower attachments and even whirlpool 
settings. Paragraph 6.1 of ASTM F2670-17 permits infant bath tubs to 
have ``a permanent or removable passive crotch restraint as part of 
their design,'' but does not permit ``any additional restraint 
system(s) which requires action on the part of the caregiver to secure 
or release.''

B. Market Description

    Typically, infant bath tubs are produced and/or marketed by 
juvenile

[[Page 15616]]

product manufacturers and distributors. Currently, at least 25 
manufacturers and importers supply infant bath tubs to the U.S. market, 
including 22 domestic firms: 14 are domestic manufacturers, seven are 
domestic importers, and one firm has an unknown supply source. Three 
foreign companies export directly to the United States via Internet 
sales or to U.S. retailers.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Staff made these determinations using information from Dun & 
Bradstreet and Reference USAGov, as well as firm Web sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to preliminary data collected with the CPSC's 2013 
Durable Products Nursery Exposure Survey, households with children 
under 6 years old own approximately 8.9 million infant bath tubs. Of 
those, approximately 4.4 million are currently in use.

III. Incident Data

A. Overview of Incident Data

    The Commission is aware of a total of 247 incidents (31 fatal and 
216 nonfatal) related to infant bath tubs that were reported to have 
occurred from January 2004 through December 2015. This total includes 
45 new infant bath tub-related incidents reported since the NPR \3\ 
(collected between May 20, 2015 and December 31, 2015). None of the 
newly reported incidents is a fatality. All of the new incidents fall 
within the hazard patterns identified in the NPR. Just over half (146 
out of 247 or 59 percent) of the reports were submitted to the CPSC by 
retailers and manufacturers through the CPSC's ``Retailer Reporting 
System.'' The remaining 101 incident reports were submitted to the CPSC 
from various sources, such as the CPSC Hotline, Internet reports, 
newspaper clippings, medical examiners, and other state/local 
authorities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Data discussed in the NPR was collected from January 1, 2004 
through May 20, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    More recently, staff also reviewed the incident data for 2016 and 
identified an additional 34 incidents with no fatalities. Staff did not 
identify any new hazard patterns in the 2016 data. The more detailed 
discussion of incident data that follows does not include year 2016 
incidents.
1. Fatalities
    Of the 31 decedents in the fatal incidents, 29 of the victims were 
between the ages of 4 months and 11 months old; the other two 
fatalities were a 23-month-old and a 3-year-old. The fatalities were 
evenly split with 16 males and 15 females. In 30 of the 31 fatalities, 
a parent or guardian was not present at the time the incident occurred. 
Drowning was the cause of death reported for 30 of the 31 fatalities. 
The remaining fatality involved a child with ventricular septal defect, 
and the coroner listed that the immediate cause of death was attributed 
to pneumonia.
2. Nonfatal Incidents
    Thirty-two injuries were reported among the 216 nonfatal incidents. 
Eight of nine hospitalizations were due to near-drowning, and one was 
due to a scalding water burn. In all eight near-drowning 
hospitalizations, the parent or guardian had left the child alone for 
at least a short period of time when the incident occurred. Five 
additional near-drowning incidents required emergency department 
treatment. The remaining incidents ranged from rashes, upper 
respiratory infections due to mold on the product, slip and fall 
injury, laceration by sharp edge, a hit on head by toy accessory, and a 
concussion from falling from a tub.
3. National Injury Estimates \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The source of the injury estimates is the National 
Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a statistically valid 
injury surveillance system. NEISS injury data is gathered from 
emergency departments of hospitals that are selected as a 
probability sample of all the U.S. hospitals with emergency 
departments. The surveillance data gathered from the sample 
hospitals enable CPSC staff to make timely national estimates of the 
number of injuries associated with specific consumer products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commission staff estimates a total of 2,300 injuries (sample size = 
89, coefficient of variation = 0.18) related to infant bath tubs 
occurred from 2004 to 2015, which were treated in U.S. hospital 
emergency departments.\5\ The injury estimates for individual years are 
not reportable because they fail to meet publication criteria.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ National injury estimates for 2004-2014 were presented in 
the NPR.
    \6\ According to the NEISS publication criteria, an estimate 
must be 1,200 or greater, the sample size must be 20 or greater, and 
the coefficient of variation must be 33 percent or smaller.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One drowning death was reported through the NEISS and is included 
in the fatality counts for infant bath tubs. About 94 percent of the 
estimated emergency department visits during the 11-year period 
involved infants 12 months of age or younger, and all but three cases 
involved children 24 months of age or younger. The cases involving 
children older than 2 years of age included: A 5-year-old who received 
a laceration while playing with the infant bath tub, a 3-year-old 
falling off an infant tub, and a 6-year-old landing in a straddle 
position on an infant tub while getting out of a bathtub.
    The estimated emergency department visits were split almost evenly 
among male (48%) and female (52%) children. For the emergency 
department-treated injuries related to infant bath tubs, the following 
characteristics occurred most frequently:
     Hazard--falls (35%); a majority of the reports did not 
specify the manner or cause of fall;
     Injured body part--head (37%), all/over half of body 
(20%), and face (18%);
     Injury type--internal organ injury (included closed head 
injuries) (29%), drowning or nearly drowning (20%), and contusions/
abrasions (18%);
     Disposition--treated and released (83%) and admitted or 
transferred to a hospital (14%).

B. Hazard Pattern Characterization Based on Incident Data

    Figure 1 shows the distribution of hazard patterns for infant bath 
tubs by frequency.

[[Page 15617]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR30MR17.040

     Drowning/Near-Drownings account for 17 percent (43 of 247) 
of reported incidents. Of the 43 drowning or near-drowning incidents, 
30 were fatalities and 13 were near-drowning incidents. Because no one 
witnessed most of the incidents, Commission staff cannot determine a 
pattern that led to the submersions. However, in 38 of 43 incidents, 
the parent or guardian was not present at the time the incident 
occurred. Frequently, the child was found floating. In the other five 
incidents in which the parent or guardian was present, four of the 
children survived. Only one reported fatality was not ruled a drowning; 
this incident is included in the miscellaneous category.
     Protrusion/Sharp/Laceration issues account for 19 percent 
(48 of 247) of reported incidents. A protrusion is commonly a part of 
the product that sticks out or has a rough surface; and in the 
incidents reported, the child rubbed against the protruding part in 
some way, which caused red marks, cuts, or bruising. The injured body 
parts reportedly included toes, feet, bottom, genitalia, and back. In 
29 of 39 incidents, the part of the infant bath tub described as a 
``bump'' or ``hump'' caused a red mark on the infant's back or 
discomfort to the infant in the bath tub. Typically, the bath tub 
``hammock/sling'' attachment was involved in this type of protrusion 
incident. One incident required a hospital visit, and the remaining 47 
incidents involved no injury or a minor injury. The incident requiring 
a hospital visit involved a scratch to the child's back, caused by a 
screw that penetrated the tub wall.
     Product Failures account for 34 percent (85 of 247) of 
reported incidents. Fifty-nine incidents reported the bath tub 
``hammock/sling'' attachment collapsing, and eight additional incidents 
of the locking mechanism failing or breaking. The remaining 18 
incidents involved various tub parts breaking. Of the 85 product 
failures, two incidents required a trip to the hospital, and the 
remaining incidents reported either no injury or a minor injury. The 
two children who required hospital trips were treated and released. One 
of these incidents was due to a toy breaking off from the tub and 
causing a deep cut to the victim's forehead. The second incident was 
due to a leg collapsing on a tub placed on a counter top; as a result, 
the child fell from the counter top to the floor and suffered a 
concussion.
     Entrapment issues account for 8 percent (20 of 247) of 
reported incidents. Entrapment incidents involve body parts caught or 
stuck on parts of the tub, mostly in a pinching manner. The body parts 
reportedly injured were fingers, arms, feet, legs, and genitalia. Many 
of these injuries occurred in tubs that fold. The most common 
components of the tubs causing injury were the hinges, holes, and foot 
area inside the tub. No reported incident required a hospital visit. 
All of the entrapment-related reports involved either no injury or a 
minor injury.
     Slippery tub surface issues account for 6 percent (15 out 
of 247) of reported incidents. Common reported incidents and concerns 
include scratches to the body or protrusions that contact the body, or 
potential submersions, including the head. One emergency room visit was 
due to a child slipping under water and swallowing some water; the rest 
of the reports involved either no injury or a minor injury.
     Mold/Allergy issues account for 5 percent (12 of 247) of 
reported incidents. Of the 12 incidents, eight were due to mold, and 
four were due to allergy. Reported issues included a variety of 
symptoms: Itching, rashes, foul odor, respiratory concerns, and a 
urinary tract infection. Eight incidents involved a single tub make and 
model, including six with mold issues and two with allergy issues. Two 
of the 12 incidents involved emergency room visits: One child may have 
developed an upper respiratory issue and one child

[[Page 15618]]

broke out in a rash throughout the child's back. Seven additional 
incidents required medical treatment: Four reported itching and rashes, 
one reported a urinary tract infection, and one reported mold spores on 
the genitalia.
     Miscellaneous issues account for the remaining 10 percent 
(24 of 247) of the reported incidents. The incidents included a fall 
from the tub, an unstable tub, missing pieces, leaking or overheating 
batteries, rust, and scalding. One incidental fatality and one hospital 
visit fall in this miscellaneous category. The fatality involved a 
child with a ventricular septal defect, with the death attributed to 
pneumonia. A scalding incident in which a parent poured hot water from 
the stove onto the foam cushion in the infant bath tub and then placed 
the child in the tub resulted in the hospital visit. The remaining 
reports were either an incident with no injury or a minor injury, 
including six battery-related complaints.

IV. Overview and Assessment of ASTM F2670

    ASTM F2670, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath 
Tubs, is the voluntary standard that was developed to address the 
identified hazard patterns associated with the use of infant bath tubs. 
The standard was first approved by ASTM in 2009, and then revised in 
2010, twice in 2011, 2012, 2013, twice in 2016, and the newest version 
was approved on January 1, 2017. The NPR referenced ASTM F2670-13, with 
the following modifications to the ASTM standard to adequately address 
hazard patterns identified in the incident data:
    1. Revised latching or locking mechanism testing protocol.
    2. Revised static load testing protocol.
    3. Revised content of the warnings, markings, and instructions:
    (a) Changed the text in the drowning warnings, and
    (b) added fall hazard warning.
    4. Specified a standard format (including black text on a white 
background, table design, bullet points, and black border) for the 
warnings on the product, on the packaging, and in the instructions.
    5. Required that the safety alert symbol and the word ``WARNING'' 
on the drowning hazard label be ``at least 0.4 in. (10mm) high unless 
stated otherwise, shall be the same size, and shall be in bold capital 
letters. The remainder of the text shall be in characters whose upper 
case shall be at least 0.2 in. (5 mm) high unless stated otherwise.''
    In the time since the NPR was published, ASTM approved and 
published three more versions of the voluntary standard. The most 
recent version, ASTM F2670-17, was approved and published on January 1, 
2017. As explained below, ASTM F2670-17 addresses all of the 
Commission's proposed modifications and concerns described in the NPR, 
allowing the Commission to adopt ASTM F2670-17, without modification, 
as the mandatory safety standard for infant bath tubs.

A. Revised Latching or Locking Mechanism Requirements

    The NPR proposed a modification to F2670-13 to allow more time for 
the latching or locking mechanism testing to accommodate more 
complicated mechanisms. Through the ASTM process, the wording and 
rationale for the latching or locking mechanism durability testing in 
paragraph 7.1.2 of F2670 evolved. The language is consistent with the 
language in the NPR and is now incorporated into ASTM F2670-17. For the 
final rule, the Commission is adopting the language in 7.1.2 of F2670-
17, without modification.

B. Revised Static Load Requirements

    The NPR proposed a modification to paragraph 7.4.2 of F2670-13 to 
change the static load test apparatus to a shot bag, which was 
recommended by the ASTM subcommittee, but not yet balloted through ASTM 
at the time of the NPR. ASTM has now balloted the revision, which is 
included in F2670-17. The revised language is consistent with the 
modifications in the NPR, and thus, the Commission adopts paragraph 
7.4.2 of F2670-17 for the final rule, without modification.

C. Revised Content of the Warnings, Markings, and Instructions

    The NPR proposed that the drowning and fall hazard warnings state:
    Drowning Hazard: Babies have drowned while using infant bath tubs.
     Stay in arm's reach of your baby.
     Use in empty adult tub or sink.
     Keep drain open.
    Fall Hazard: Babies have suffered head injuries falling from infant 
bath tubs.
     Place tub only [insert manufacturer's intended 
locations(s) for safe use (e.g., in adult tub, sink or on floor; in 
adult tub or on floor)].
     Never lift or carry baby in tub.
    Although ASTM F2670-13 contained warning statements for both 
drowning and fall hazards, the warning header only identified drowning 
as the hazard. The Commission proposed in the NPR to separate the 
warnings to identify more clearly the drowning hazard and fall hazard 
and to provide guidance on how to avoid these hazards. Additionally, 
the NPR proposed warning language that was more personal by use of the 
word ``baby.'' For example, the NPR used the word ``babies'' as opposed 
to ``infant'' and the phrase ``stay in arm's reach of your baby'' as 
opposed to ``ALWAYS keep infant within adult's reach.''
    After the NPR, the warning content in the voluntary standard was 
revised to be consistent with the modifications in the NPR, except for 
one statement. ASTM F2670-17 contains a revision to the hazard 
statement ``Keep drain open,'' clarifying that caregivers should keep 
the drain in an adult tub open during bathing, stating ``Keep drain 
open in adult tub or sink.'' The Commission agrees that the added 
statement clarifies the direction to caregivers. Accordingly, the final 
rule adopts the revised warning content in ASTM F2670-17, without 
modification.

D. Warning Label Format

    At the time of the NPR, F2670-13 did not require any specific 
formatting for warning statements. The NPR proposed specific changes to 
the format of warning statements consistent with ANSI Z535.4, American 
National Standard for Product Safety Signs and Labels. CPSC staff 
regularly cites ANSI Z535.4 as a baseline in developing warning 
materials. Since the NPR was published, ASTM convened a task group, the 
ASTM Ad Hoc Wording Task Group (Ad Hoc TG), which consists of members 
of the various durable nursery product voluntary standards committees, 
including CPSC staff. The purpose of the Ad Hoc TG is to harmonize the 
wording, as well as warning format, across durable infant and toddler 
product ASTM voluntary standards. CPSC's Human Factors Division hazard 
communication subject matter expert, who also is the CPSC staff 
representative on the ANSI Z535 committee, represents CPSC staff on 
this task group. ASTM's Ad Hoc TG recommendations related to the format 
of warning statements were published as a reference document entitled, 
``Ad Hoc Wording--May 4, 2016,'' as part of the F15 Committee 
Documents. The approved Ad Hoc Wording guidance document recommends 
formatting requirements that are similar to the ANSI Z535.4 
requirements, with modifications intended to make the Ad Hoc TG's 
recommendations more stringent.
    After publication of the Ad Hoc Wording recommendation, the ASTM

[[Page 15619]]

committee for infant bath tubs balloted and approved incorporation of 
the Ad Hoc Wording guidance recommendations into ASTM F2670-17. 
Commission staff states that adopting the Ad Hoc Wording guidance 
document recommendations provides noticeable and consistent warning 
labels, including warning formatting, on infant bath tubs and across 
juvenile products. Therefore, for the final rule, the Commission adopts 
the warning formatting requirements incorporated into ASTM F2670-17, 
without modification.

E. Warning Label Font Size

    The NPR proposed to increase the font size of the safety alert 
symbol, and the word ``WARNING,'' to be not less than 0.4 in. (10 mm) 
high and the remainder of the text with upper case characters not less 
than 0.2 in. (5 mm) high.\7\ The Commission proposed this revision to 
align the font size for infant bath tub labeling with ASTM F1967, 
Standard Consumer Safety Specifications for Infant Bath Seats, which is 
already incorporated into a federal standard. Similar to bath tub 
incidents, bath seat incidents also include drownings associated with 
caregivers leaving children unattended. Currently, increased font size 
for warning statements is unique to the infant bath seats voluntary and 
mandatory standards. The Ad Hoc Wording guidance document does not 
include this modification. The Ad Hoc Wording guidance document 
recommends that the font size of the safety alert symbol, and the word 
``WARNING,'' be not less than 0.2 in. (5 mm) high and the remainder of 
the text with upper case characters be not less than 0.1 in. (2.5 mm) 
high. ASTM F2670-17 follows the Ad Hoc Wording guidance document, and 
does not include the increased font size that the Commission proposed 
in the NPR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ This requirement applies to a separate drowning hazard label 
and if the drowning and fall hazard labels are displayed together. 
If the fall hazard label is separate, smaller text size applies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission recognizes that the Ad Hoc Wording guidance document 
improves the warning label format, and therefore, the effectiveness of 
the warning statements. ASTM F2670-17 contains all of the Ad Hoc 
Wording guidance document recommendations. As stated above, the 
specific formatting changes in the AD Hoc Wording guidance follow the 
guidance of ANSI Z535.4, differing from what was proposed in the NPR 
only in terms of the specific size exception that had been proposed for 
the drowning warning label. The warning label changes in F2670-17 bring 
the formatting and language of the warning label into close alignment 
with the NPR proposal, except for the size requirements. The Commission 
concludes that all of the formatting and wording revisions incorporated 
into ASTM F2670-17 improve the labeling over the labeling in F2670-13, 
referenced in the NPR. The Commission cannot state definitively that 
increasing the font size of this particular warning statement will 
influence caregiver behavior more than the totality of formatting 
changes already incorporated into ASTM F2670-17. However, in an August 
10, 2016 letter to ASTM,\8\ CPSC staff encouraged further exploration 
of the increased size of the warnings to determine whether these 
additional changes will provide even greater effect. Therefore, the 
final rule incorporates by reference ASTM F2670-17, without any 
modifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=CPSC-2015-0019-0023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

F. Infant Bath Slings

    Updated incident data for the final rule demonstrates that 59 of 
the 85 ``product failure'' incidents involve the infant bath hammock or 
sling collapsing. No injuries or minor injuries resulted from the bath 
hammock/sling incidents. In October 2016, CPSC recalled the infant bath 
tub with a sling accessory that was involved in the majority of infant 
bath sling incidents.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2017/Summer-Infant-Recalls-Infant-Bath-Tubs (viewed on Web site 11/22/2016.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, ASTM F2670-17 does not include provisions that will 
specifically address the incidents involving bath hammocks/slings. 
Staff advises that the ASTM subcommittee on bath tubs is working to 
evaluate this issue, but has not yet completed its work. CPSC staff 
continues to work with two ASTM task groups formed to address the risks 
of bath slings. One group is developing performance requirements for 
infant bath slings that only can be used with infant bath tubs. A 
second group is developing requirements for infant bath slings that are 
used separately or as tub accessories, which will be addressed under a 
new, separate standard. CPSC staff states that new requirements for 
bath hammocks/slings that can be used with an infant bath tub will be 
added to the voluntary standard in the near future, as the task group 
is preparing to present recommendations to the larger subcommittee 
during an April 2017 ASTM meeting, and anticipates balloting of the new 
provisions shortly after the meeting. Therefore, the Commission is 
proceeding with a final rule on infant bath tubs and urges the ASTM 
subcommittee to finalize the inclusion of infant bath hammock/sling 
requirements to the ASTM standard.
    If the voluntary standard for infant bath tubs is revised to 
include requirements for infant bath slings used with an infant bath 
tub and the Commission is notified of the revised standard by ASTM, 
CPSC staff will assess the revised voluntary standard. Staff will then 
make a recommendation to the Commission regarding whether to revise the 
mandatory standard for infant bath tubs to incorporate new provisions 
on infant bath slings, using the process for updating durable infant 
and toddler product rules pursuant to section 104 of the CPSIA. 
Similarly, if ASTM creates a new voluntary standard related to infant 
bath slings that are used separately or as tub accessories, CPSC staff 
will assess the ASTM standard and make a recommendation to the 
Commission whether to create a new mandatory durable infant and toddler 
standard under section 104 of the CPSIA for such products.

V. Response to Comments

    The August 14, 2015 NPR solicited information and comments 
concerning all aspects of the NPR, and specifically asked about the 
cost of compliance with, and testing to, the proposed mandatory infant 
bath tub standard, the proposed 6-month effective date for the new 
mandatory rule and the amendment to part 1112. The Commission received 
12 comments related to the NPR. Seven commenters expressed general 
support of the NPR, along with additional, more specific, comments. 
Five commenters either requested more time for the ASTM committee to 
consider the NPR proposals and revise the voluntary standard, as 
appropriate, or disagreed with some of the proposed requirements in the 
NPR. Comments and other supporting documentation, such as summaries of 
ASTM meetings, are available on: www.Regulations.gov, by searching 
Docket No. CPSC-2015-0019.
    We summarize the comments received on the NPR and CPSC's responses 
below.

A. Test Requirements

    (Comment 1) Two commenters recommended that the text of the static 
load test protocol match the ASTM F2670 standard language. The 
commenters noted that wording in the NPR was similar to what was 
balloted and approved by ASTM, but not exact.
    (Response 1) At the time of the NPR, staff recommended using the 
exact wording that the ASTM subcommittee

[[Page 15620]]

was proposing. After the NPR, the ASTM subcommittee chairman made 
editorial changes to the proposal, which resulted in slight differences 
between the ASTM wording and the NPR wording. The Commission agrees 
that the static load test protocol language reflected in ASTM F2670-17 
is nearly the same as the language proposed in the NPR, and will accept 
the ASTM F2670-17 language in the final rule, without modification.
    (Comment 2) Two commenters recommended including the revised static 
load test protocol rationale (X1.2 Section 7.4.2) in the final rule.
    (Response 2) Consistent with the response to comment 1, the 
Commission agrees that the rationale for the static load test protocol 
language reflected in ASTM F2670-17 be included in the final rule, 
without modification.
    (Comment 3) Two commenters stated that the Latching or Locking 
Mechanism Durability test protocol in the NPR is identical to what has 
been balloted and approved for a revision to F2670. The commenters 
requested that the final rule accept this language.
    (Response 3) The Commission agrees with the Latching or Locking 
Mechanism Durability test language in ASTM F2670-17 Section 7.1 and 
will incorporate this revision into the final rule, without 
modification.
    (Comment 4) Two commenters recommended including the revised 
Latching or Locking Mechanism Durability test language rationale (X1.1 
Section 7.1.2) in the final rule.
    (Response 4) The Commission agrees. The final rule incorporates the 
rationale for the Latching or Locking Mechanism Durability test 
protocol language reflected in ASTM F2670-17.
    (Comment 5) One commenter recommended that stands for bath tubs be 
included in the final rule. The commenter indicated that the current 
voluntary standard does not include stands, but stated a concern about 
an influx into the U.S. market of European-designed products that have 
matching stands.
    (Response 5) The Commission is aware that infant bath tub stands 
are not covered by the current voluntary standard, ASTM F2670-17. CPSC 
staff advised that staff is not aware of any incident data involving 
bath tub stands. CPSC staff will monitor incident data and the retail 
market for use of these products. Currently, however, based on the lack 
of incident data, the Commission is not including bath tub stands in 
the final rule.

B. Incident Data

    (Comment 6) One commenter questioned whether CPSC staff shared all 
of CPSC's incident data with ASTM. The NPR referenced 202 incidents 
related to infant bath tubs, while CPSC staff reported to ASTM an 
awareness of 156 incidents that occurred from 2004 to 2014. The 
commenter questioned whether CPSC had included ``sling'' data in its 
incident review for the NPR, noting that sling accessories are not 
included in the scope of the current ASTM standard.
    (Response 6) CPSC staff included bath slings data in its incident 
review for the NPR and provided such data to ASTM. Inclusion of this 
data prompted ASTM to form two task groups to address incidents related 
to bath slings. One group is developing performance requirements for 
infant bath slings that only can be used with infant bath tubs. ASTM 
intends to include these requirements in ASTM F2670. A second group is 
developing requirements for infant bath slings that are used separately 
or as tub accessories, which will be addressed under a new, separate 
voluntary standard.
    With regard to data discrepancies between CPSC and ASTM, such 
discrepancies may exist for several reasons. First, the scope of the 
data sets may be different. For example, the NPR data included 
incidents reported to CPSC involving infant bath tubs received from 
January 1, 2004, through May 20, 2015. The data delivered to ASTM for 
the fall 2014 meetings included data received by CPSC through July 24, 
2014. CPSC provided an additional update to ASTM for the spring 2016 
meeting.
    Second, CPSC cannot share confidential data with ASTM. The CPSC 
rulemaking packages include all data received by staff; this includes 
data received through the Retailer Reporting Program (RRP). Tab A to 
the staff's briefing package for the final rule on infant bath tubs 
demonstrates that CPSC received a sizeable portion of the nonfatal 
incident data through RRP; the same was true for the NPR. Because RRP 
information is submitted confidentially, CPSC provides a general 
summary of RRP data for rulemaking packages, but cannot share incident 
details received through the RRP with ASTM, unless CPSC completes a 
follow-up in-depth investigation, or such reports were also received 
from other sources.
    Third, the Infant Bath Tub subcommittee appears to maintain data in 
a manner that does not match identically to incident data supplied by 
CPSC staff nor to the incident data in the NPR. Incident data 
maintained by the ASTM subcommittee is described by the commenter. CPSC 
staff provided 167 infant bath tub-related incidents to ASTM in fall 
2014. Thirty incidents involved a fatality and 137 reports described a 
nonfatal incident. When the ASTM subcommittee prepared its data, 12 
nonfatal incidents provided by CPSC staff were not included in the 
subcommittee's spreadsheet. CPSC document numbers for these 12 
incidents (some have been investigated) are: H0430279A, I07B0418A, 
I1170518A, I1210049A, H1330201A, I1380526A, I1390145A, I13B0030A, 
I1430085A, I1430327A, I1450108A, 60318884. Of the 12 incidents, 11 
involved slings, and one involved a faucet adapter, which was later 
determined to be out of scope for this product category.
    (Comment 7) One commenter stated that incidents related to infant 
bath tubs have declined significantly over the years. The commenter 
stated that no urgency for a rule on infant bath tubs exists because of 
this decline.
    (Response 7) CPSC is issuing the final rule for infant bath tubs to 
fulfill a congressional mandate under section 104 of the CPSIA to 
create mandatory standards for durable infant and toddler products. 
Moreover, NPR data consisted of incidents received by CPSC on or before 
May 20, 2015. Accordingly, any comparison of the number of incidents 
reported to CPSC that occurred in 2015 to any past years is 
inappropriate because the data from past years do not represent the 
full year of 2015 data. In the NPR, of the overall 31 fatalities, four 
deaths were reported in each of 2010 and 2011; two deaths were reported 
in 2012; and one each was reported in 2013 and 2014. In the most 
current infant bath tub Epidemiology memorandum, Tab A of the staff 
briefing package for a final rule on infant bath tubs, staff states 
that as of February 17, 2016, CPSC has not received any fatal incident 
reports for infant bath tubs. CPSC generally does not expect completed 
reporting of fatal incidents for a particular year for 2 to 3 years 
later, due to lag time of the many ways fatal incidents are reported to 
CPSC. For instance, CPSC does not expect all reported 2014 fatalities 
to be received by CPSC until around late 2016, or sometime in 2017. 
Because of the lag time in receiving incident data, CPSC does not 
publish or draw conclusions using the number of fatalities reported in 
the most recent years. It is possible, and would not be unexpected, for 
additional infant bath tub fatalities that occurred in 2014 or

[[Page 15621]]

2015, to be reported to CPSC in the future.
    Recent data collection on infant bath tub incidents reported to 
CPSC on or before February 17, 2016 reflect an increase in the number 
of nonfatal incidents related to infant bath tubs for the years 2013 
(26 reports), 2014 (31 reports), and 2015 (44 reports). CPSC also 
experiences a lag time between the date of a nonfatal incident and CPSC 
receiving the reports.

C. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act (IRFA)

    (Comment 8) One commenter, a domestic manufacturer of inflatable 
infant bathtubs, stated that it would be adversely affected by defining 
``inflatable bathtubs'' to be durable products falling within the scope 
of a mandatory rule. The commenter stated that the proposed rule would 
require the manufacturer to provide consumers with prepaid product 
registration cards and to provide an option for consumers to register 
products via the Internet. The commenter asserted that this would 
increase its costs by 1.5 to 2.0 percent on an ongoing basis.
    (Response 8) The requirement that manufacturers of durable infant 
or toddler products provide each consumer with a product registration 
card was established by the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 
2008, and not by the this rule on infant bath tubs. In 16 CFR part 
1130, the Commission determined that infant bath tubs are durable 
infant or toddler products. No exclusion was made for inflatable bath 
tubs. Therefore, the statutory and regulatory requirements concerning 
the provision of product registration cards to consumers already apply 
to manufacturers of inflatable infant bath tubs and will be unaffected 
by the final rule.
    (Comment 9) One commenter stated: ``in order to ensure that the 
lifespan of our inflatable tub would match that of the hard plastic 
tubs and folding tubs . . . ., the thickness of the vinyl used would 
have to be increased to the point where the cost of manufacturing and 
subsequent retail price of the item would be more than the market would 
bear.'' The commenter estimated that this would increase the cost of 
the product by 10 to 15 percent.
    (Response 9) The commenter may misunderstand some of the 
requirements of the proposed rule and the voluntary standard. Although 
inflatable infant bath tubs are classified as durable infant or toddler 
products, ASTM F2670 does not require the products to have a minimum 
expected life. The standard contains requirements that, among other 
things, are intended to ensure that the bath tub will not collapse or 
break during use and that any latching or locking mechanisms on the 
product are durable.
    (Comment 10) One commenter stated that the cost of labelling is not 
as small as indicated in the NPR. Although the commenter agreed that 
the labelling costs are one-time costs, the commenter said it would 
take ``multiple years to recoup the loss in margin.'' The commenter did 
not provide an estimate of the labelling costs. The commenter stated 
that the commenter would likely ``cease manufacturing inflatable infant 
bathtubs for sale in the U.S'' if the standard is codified as it is 
currently written.
    (Response 10) Although the commenter asserted that the labelling 
cost would be greater than indicated, the commenter did not provide any 
specific estimates of the expected labelling costs. Without more 
information, the Commission cannot provide a specific response to this 
comment.

D. Performance and Labelling Requirements

    (Comment 11) Two commenters requested that CPSC in the mandatory 
rule require a maximum water fill line on infant bath tubs. One 
commenter suggested that the ``fill line demarcation be specified at 
depths of no greater than 2 inches.'' The other commenter suggested the 
manufacturer be responsible for providing a maximum fill line that is 
in a ``suitable position.''
    (Response 11) A similar suggestion to require a water fill line was 
raised in the rulemaking for infant bath seats. For the same reason we 
gave in that rulemaking, the Commission will not include a water fill 
line in the infant bath tubs final rule. CPSC staff has voiced concern 
that a water fill line on infant bath tubs could imply a safe water 
level, even though staff is aware that children have drowned in very 
little water. Staff advises, and the Commission agrees, that the ASTM 
wording required in the user instruction, ``Babies can drown in as 
little as 1 inch of water. Use as little water as possible to bathe 
your baby,'' accurately describes the risk associated with any level of 
water. CPSC staff will continue to monitor this issue.
    (Comment 12) A commenter indicated that icons for key safety 
messages were clearer to consumers, but the commenter did not 
specifically recommend that CPSC require use of icons and pictograms in 
the final rule for infant bath tubs.
    (Response 12) The Commission acknowledges that icons and pictograms 
can be used to convey a hazard more effectively, especially for 
consumers with limited or no English literacy. However, CPSC staff 
advises that the design of effective graphics can be difficult. For 
example, some seemingly obvious graphics are poorly understood and can 
give rise to consumer interpretations that are opposite of what the 
message of the graphic is intended to convey (deemed ``critical 
confusions'' in human factors literature). Use of icons and pictograms 
generally require a consumer study to ensure that the intended message 
is conveyed. However, if revised warning statements prove to be 
inadequate to address safety hazards associated with infant bath tubs, 
CPSC staff may recommend developing graphic symbols in the future to 
further reduce the risk of injury. Currently, however, the Commission 
is not mandating use of graphics for warning labels in the infant bath 
tubs final rule.
    (Comment 13) A commenter stated: ``any safety wording should be 
equally visible in Spanish as well as English.''
    (Response 13) The NPR states that the warning label shall appear, 
at a minimum, in the English language. The Commission does not dismiss 
the usefulness of providing warnings in Spanish and other non-English 
languages, and recognizes that adding Spanish versions of the warnings 
most likely would improve warning readability among the U.S. population 
more than adding any other language. Nevertheless, the Commission's 
incident data analyses for infant bath tubs have not revealed a pattern 
of incidents involving people who speak Spanish. Accordingly, the final 
rule does not require warnings to be in English and Spanish, but does 
not prohibit manufacturers from providing the required warnings in 
another language, in addition to English.
    (Comment 14) Two commenters urged CPSC to monitor ASTM's work on 
including infant bath sling accessories to the infant bath tub 
standard.
    (Response 14) CPSC staff has been an active participant in the ASTM 
task group work regarding infant bath sling accessories sold with and 
used with infant bath tubs. Staff will continue this work. We encourage 
the infant bath sling task group to finalize recommended sling 
requirements so that the ASTM subcommittee can discuss this progress 
and vote for inclusion of bath sling requirements in the voluntary 
standard for infant bath tubs. Once this work is complete, CPSC staff 
will assess whether any revised voluntary standard adequately addresses 
incident data on bath slings

[[Page 15622]]

and make a recommendation to the Commission. The Commission will 
consider whether to incorporate such revisions into an amendment to the 
mandatory bath tubs standard through the revision process described in 
section 3 of Public Law 112-28.
    (Comment 15) One commenter recommended that, based on the incident 
data, CPSC restrict the scope of the rule to cover only infant bath 
tubs for infants under 24 months of age.
    (Response 15) The Commission is not including an age limit in the 
final rule for infant bath tubs. Section 104(f) of the CPSIA defines 
``durable infant or toddler products'' as ``durable products intended 
for use, or that may be reasonably expected to be used, by children 
under the age of 5 years.'' Although infant bath tubs are considered 
durable infant or toddler products, no age requirement or age cut-off 
for use of the product is included in the ASTM standard. Depending on 
the manufacturer's design, infant bath tubs can accommodate users from 
newborns to preschoolers. Safety requirements included in the ASTM 
standard, and incorporated into the final rule for bath tubs, benefit 
infants and toddlers across all intended ages of foreseeable users.
    (Comment 16) One commenter stated support for the ``new wording as 
it is clearer,'' and stated that the ``new FALLING HAZARD is a good 
addition.'' The commenter suggested adding an additional warning to 
``NOT USE ON RAISED SURFACES, SUCH AS TABLES OR WORKTOPS.''
    (Response 16) One incident involved a skull fracture sustained when 
a bath tub fell from a kitchen counter. Based on the incident data, 
staff advises that the fall warnings included in ASTM F2670-17 
adequately and succinctly convey the message of where the infant bath 
tub can be used safely based on the manufacturer's intended use. 
Specifically, section 8.5.2.2 of the voluntary standard states:
    Additional warning statements shall address the following:
     Place tub only [insert manufacturer's intended location(s) 
for safe use (e.g., in adult tub, sink, or on floor)].
     Never lift or carry baby in tub.

Staff will continue to monitor incidents for use of bath tubs on 
elevated surfaces.
    (Comment 17) One commenter stated: ``the requirement in 16 CFR 
1234.2(b)(6)(i)(C) previously proposed by CPSC was discussed by the 
task group; it was considered too nebulous, subjective and virtually 
unenforceable, and therefore was recommended to be deleted.''
    (Response 17) Proposed 16 CFR 1234.2(b)(6)(i)(C) states: ``9.3 In 
addition to the warnings, the instructional literature shall emphasize 
and reinforce the safe practices stated in the warnings.'' The intent 
of the statement was to ensure that the instructional statements in 
section 9 of the voluntary standard remain consistent with the warning 
statements in section 8. Current wording in section 9 of ASTM F2670-17 
meets this objective. Accordingly, for the final rule, the Commission 
adopts the wording in section 9 of ASTM F2670-17, without modification.

E. General and Legal

    (Comment 18) Two commenters recommended delaying publication of the 
final rule until major warnings format and content revisions proposed 
in the NPR can be properly reviewed, balloted through the ASTM process, 
and then implemented into F2670.
    (Response 18) Since the NPR was published, ASTM's subcommittee for 
infant bath tubs reviewed, balloted, and published a new standard 
(F2670-17) with improved warning formatting and content revisions in 
alignment with the NPR, except for the font size of certain warning 
statements. For the final rule, the Commission incorporates by 
reference ASTM F2670-17, without modification.
    (Comment 19) One commenter noted that the NPR contains several 
errors when referring to figures that show example warning labels. The 
Commenter stated:
     Figure 1 is missing from the NPR. The NPR starts with 
Figure 2;
     A reference to Figure 3 is missing in proposed section 
1234.2(b)(4)(i)(F);
     A reference to Figure 3 in proposed section 
1234.2(b)(6)(i)(B)(3) is inaccurate and should instead reference Figure 
4; and
     A reference to Figure 4 in proposed section 
1234.2(b)(6)(i)(B)(3) is inaccurate and should reference a different 
example warning label similar to Figure 3.
    (Response 19) The omission of Figure 1 from the NPR was 
intentional. Figure 1 is referenced in paragraph 5.6 of ASTM F2670-13, 
which the Commission proposed to incorporate by reference without 
modification. The NPR only discussed sections of the proposed rule that 
differed from ASTM F2670-13. Reusing Figure 1 in the NPR would have 
created two ``Figure 1'' designations in the final rule. Otherwise, we 
agree with the comment and references to figures are corrected in the 
final rule by incorporation of ASTM F2670-17 without modification.
    (Comment 20) A commenter stated that, while they appreciated CPSC 
staff's work on the proposed rule, they were concerned about staff's 
``ability to seemingly be able to arbitrarily change language or 
standards without any justification.'' In addition the commenter 
stated: ``[i]t is the role of the Commission, not professional staff to 
dictate changes in policy.'' (Emphasis in original).
    (Response 20) The Commission does not agree that staff 
``arbitrarily'' changes language in a standard ``without any 
justification.'' In fact, staff ensures that each package for proposed 
and final rules contains ample explanation and thorough documentation 
of the appropriate engineering and/or scientific analysis to support 
staff's recommendations. By voting to issue the NPR, the Commission 
expressed its policy decisions. Furthermore, at ASTM meetings, CPSC 
staff is not speaking for the Commission, but is expressing staff's 
views, based on staff's expertise.
    Moreover, since the proposed rule was published, CPSC staff 
continued participating on the ASTM Ad Hoc TG on warning labels. The Ad 
Hoc TG discussed labeling issues, including formatting, and a best-
practices approach for ASTM juvenile products standards warning labels 
moving forward. The latest version of the voluntary standard, ASTM 
F2670-17, incorporates the Ad Hoc TG's recommendations. For the final 
rule, the Commission incorporates by reference ASTM F2670-17, without 
modification.
    (Comment 21) A commenter stated that the text of the rule for 
infant bath tubs should be available for free and in the public domain, 
rather than incorporating by reference an ASTM standard that is subject 
to copyright restrictions. The commenter made several arguments 
supporting this contention, including:
     Citizens have the right ``without limitation, to read, 
speak, and disseminate the laws that we are required to obey, including 
laws that are critical to public safety and commerce'';
     the right to freedom of speech is ``imperiled'' if 
citizens cannot freely communicate provisions of law with each other;
     equal protection and due process are ``jeopardized'' if 
only citizens that can afford to purchase the law have access;
     the cost of obtaining standards incorporated by reference 
into current CPSC regulations would be in the hundreds of dollars to 
purchase, and would require consultation of other agencies regulations;

[[Page 15623]]

     public access to the law is crucial to CPSC's mission: 
``rationing access to the law hurts trade, it hurts public safety, and 
it makes it much more difficult for the CPSC to carry out its 
congressionally-mandated mission.''; and
     prohibiting the wide dissemination of the mandatory rules 
for durable infant standards makes the public less safe.
    The commenter argued that, based on fundamental principles in the 
Constitution and judicial opinions, as reviewed by the commenter, it is 
unlawful and unreasonable for the Commission to make voluntary 
standards mandatory without providing free access to the law.
    (Response 21) The infant bath tub standard is authorized by 
Congress under section 104 of the CPSIA. This CPSIA provision directs 
the Commission to issue standards for durable infant or toddler 
products that are ``substantially the same as,'' or more stringent 
than, applicable voluntary standards. Thus, unless the Commission 
determines that more stringent requirements are needed, the 
Commission's rule must be nearly the same as the voluntary standard. 
ASTM's voluntary standards are protected by copyright, which the 
Commission (and the federal government generally) must observe. The 
United States may be held liable for copyright infringement. 28 U.S.C. 
1498. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) has established 
procedures for incorporation by reference that seek to balance the 
interests of copyright protection and public accessibility of material. 
1 CFR part 51. The CPSC complies with these requirements whenever 
incorporating material by reference. In addition, when the Commission 
proposes a section 104 rule, ASTM's copyrighted voluntary standards are 
available for free during the comment period.
    The Commission's process for developing section 104 rules is open 
and transparent. CPSC staff works with stakeholders through the ASTM 
process, specifically the ASTM subcommittee responsible for each 
product type, to evaluate each voluntary standard and its ability to 
address the injuries found in CPSC's incident data. The ASTM 
subcommittee includes representatives from government, manufacturers, 
retailers, trade organizations, laboratories, and consumer advocacy 
groups, as well as consultants and members of the public. CPSC staff 
that participates in ASTM meetings are required to place such meetings 
on the Commission's public calendar, draft a meeting summary, and 
provide such summary to the Commission's Office of the Secretary, 
pursuant to 16 CFR 1031.11(f) and 1012. Once rulemaking commences, 
staff also places meeting summaries on the rulemaking docket. As 
required, the Commission's section 104 rulemakings follow notice and 
comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) with an 
NPR and a final rule that explain the substance of the proposed and 
final requirements.
    We disagree that the public is less safe because final rules under 
section 104 of the CPSIA are based on a voluntary standard. Voluntary 
standards generally can be updated more frequently than a traditionally 
enacted mandatory standard to respond to changing products and emerging 
hazards. Durable infant and toddler products, in particular, are 
subject to frequent product changes, including design modifications. 
Section 104 of the CPSIA also includes a mechanism allowing the CPSC to 
update the mandatory standard when voluntary standard modifications 
occur.
    (Comment 22) A commenter objected to the process for promulgating 
rules related to durable infant and toddler products under section 104 
of the CPSIA. More specifically, the commenter objected to the lack of 
availability and accessibility of the voluntary standard that the 
Commission proposes to incorporate by reference. The commenter stated 
that although ASTM made a copy of the voluntary standard that CPSC 
proposes to incorporate by reference into the rule available for 
viewing on ASTM's Web site:
     A redline of CPSC's modifications to the voluntary 
standard was not made available;
     the standard was ``read only'';
     the standard was displayed with a legal warning 
restricting use;
     the standard did not allow for copy and paste of the text 
in the standard; and
     the document is difficult for people with visual 
impairments to use.
    (Response 22) The Freedom of Information Act requires that the text 
of the material being incorporated by reference be ``reasonably 
available.'' 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(1)(E); 1 CFR part 51. As set forth in 
response to comment 21, the Commission complies with this requirement. 
Nothing in the law requires the specific enhancements to text of the 
proposed mandatory standard articulated by the commenter.
    (Comment 23) A commenter suggested that a conflict of interest 
occurs when a government entity relies on a voluntary standards body, 
such as ASTM, that profits from the sale of what essentially becomes 
the law. The commenter stated that many government agencies have joined 
ASTM as organizational members, and that 44 CPSC employees are members 
of ASTM. The commenter also noted that the ASTM standard for infant 
bath tubs is five pages long and that when CPSC's proposed edits to the 
standard are incorporated, the standard is six to seven pages long. The 
commenter asserted that based on this: ``the government is clearly an 
author of this work.''
    (Response 23) CPSC staff did not author the voluntary standard on 
infant bath tubs. ASTM began working on the voluntary standard for 
infant bath tubs in 2006, well before the congressional mandate to 
issue mandatory standards based on the voluntary standards for durable 
infant and toddler products. CPSC staff contributed, as it always has, 
to the development of the voluntary standard to address incident data, 
along with all stakeholders who participate on the relevant 
subcommittee. Through the rulemaking process, the Commission assesses 
each voluntary standard for its ability to adequately address injuries 
found in CPSC's incident data. If the voluntary standard should be more 
stringent, the Commission proposes modifications for the mandatory 
rule. In the case of infant bath tubs, based on modifications made in 
the voluntary standard since issuance of the NPR, the Commission 
incorporates by reference the most recent voluntary standard, ASTM 
F2670-17, as the final rule for infant bath tubs, without modification.
    (Comment 24) A commenter argued that CPSC's Voluntary Standards 
Coordinator, by serving on the board of ANSI, has been placed in the 
position of ``serving two masters,'' as the person has a fiduciary 
responsibility to ANSI, as well as to his employer, the U.S. 
government. The commenter criticized the CPSC for not ``clearly 
delineat[ing] the roles government employees will take when assuming 
fiduciary responsibilities for private organizations.'' The commenter 
stated that although CPSC's Voluntary Standards Coordinator served on 
the board of ANSI, the CPSC had no memorandum of understanding (MOU) 
with ANSI regarding this relationship; and instead, CPSC asserted its 
reliance on the Commission's regulation at 16 CFR part 1031. The 
commenter stated that the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) has 
provided the guidance on government employees serving on the boards of 
external nonprofits, and the OGE recommends an MOU among the agency, 
employee and the nonprofit

[[Page 15624]]

organization to avoid violation of 18 U.S.C. 208(a).
    (Response 24) CPSC does not rely on a unique MOU among the agency, 
employee, and each voluntary standards organization. Because CPSC 
employees, based on job description, participate in different 
capacities with different organizations, the Commission has regulations 
(16 CFR part 1031) setting forth best practices and ethical 
responsibilities of employees involved in voluntary standards 
activities.

VI. Incorporation by Reference

    Section 1234.2(a) of the final rule provides that infant bath tubs 
must comply with ASTM F2670-17. The OFR has regulations concerning 
incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part 51. These regulations require 
that, for a final rule, agencies must discuss in the preamble to the 
rule the way in which materials that the agency incorporates by 
reference are reasonably available to interested persons, and how 
interested parties can obtain the materials. Additionally, the preamble 
to the rule must summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
    In accordance with the OFR's requirements, the discussion in 
section VII of this preamble summarizes the provisions of ASTM F2670-
17. Interested persons may purchase a copy of ASTM F2670-17 from ASTM, 
either through ASTM's Web site, or by mail at the address provided in 
the rule. A copy of the standard may also be inspected at the CPSC's 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, or at 
NARA, as discussed above. Note that the Commission and ASTM arranged 
for commenters to have ``read only'' access to ASTM F2670-13 during the 
NPR's comment period.

VII. Description of the Final Rule

A. Final Safety Standard for Infant Bath Tubs

    For the final rule for infant bath tubs, the Commission will 
incorporate by reference ASTM F2670-17, without modification. ASTM 
F2670-17 contains both general and product-specific requirements to 
address the hazards associated with infant bath tubs. ASTM F2670-17 
includes the following key provisions: Scope, Terminology, General 
Requirements, Performance Requirements, Test Methods, Marking and 
Labeling, and Instructional Literature.
    Scope. Section 1 of ASTM F2670-17 provides the scope of products 
covered by the standard, which: ``establishes performance requirements, 
test methods, and labeling requirements to promote the safe use of 
infant bath tubs.'' As stated in section II.A. of this preamble, ASTM 
F2670-17 defines an ``infant bath tub'' as a ``tub, enclosure, or other 
similar product intended to hold water and be placed into an adult bath 
tub, sink, or on top of other surfaces to provide support or 
containment, or both, for an infant in a reclining, sitting, or 
standing position during bathing by a caregiver.'' This description 
includes ``bucket style'' tubs that support a child sitting upright, 
tubs with an inclined seat for infants too young to sit unsupported, 
inflatable tubs, folding tubs, and tubs with more elaborate designs 
including handheld shower attachments and even whirlpool settings. ASTM 
F2670-17 excludes from its scope ``products commonly known as bath 
slings, typically made of fabric or mesh.''
    Terminology. Section 3 of ASTM F2670-17 provides definitions of 
terms specific to the infant bath tub standard.
    General Requirements. Section 5 of ASTM F2670-17 sets forth general 
requirements for infant bath tubs, including:
     Sharp Edges or Points (referencing 16 CFR 1500.48 and 
1500.49);
     Small Parts (referencing 16 CFR 1501);
     Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings (referencing 16 CFR 
1303);
     Resistance to Collapse;
     Scissoring, Shearing, and Pinching;
     Openings;
     Protective Components;
     Requirements for Toys (incorporating ASTM F963); and
     Labeling.
    Performance Requirements and Test Methods. Section 6 of ASTM F2670-
17 contains performance requirements for restraint systems, static 
load, and suction cups. Section 7 of the standard sets forth test 
methods for the performance requirements set forth in sections 5 and 6 
of the standard.
    Marking and Labeling. Section 8 of ASTM F2670-17 contains 
requirements for marking products, including warnings that must be 
applied to the product and the product packaging. Section 8 sets forth 
the substance, format, and prominence requirements for warning 
information.
    Instructional Literature. Section 9 of ASTM F2670-17 requires that 
instructions provided with infant bath tubs be easy to read and 
understand. Additionally, the section contains requirements for 
instructional literature contents and format, as well as prominence of 
certain language.

B. Amendment to 16 CFR Part 1112 to Include NOR for Infant Bath Tubs 
Standard

    The final rule amends part 1112 to add a new Sec.  1112.15(b)(41) 
that lists 16 CFR part 1234, Safety Consumer Safety Specification for 
Infant Bath Tubs, as a children's product safety rule for which the 
Commission has issued an NOR. Section XIII of the preamble provides 
additional background information regarding certification of infant 
bath tubs and issuance of an NOR.

VIII. Effective Date

    The APA generally requires that the effective date of a rule be at 
least 30 days after publication of the final rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d). 
CPSC generally considers 6 months to be sufficient time for suppliers 
of durable infant and toddler products to come into compliance with a 
new standard under section 104 of the CPSIA, and the Commission 
proposed a 6-month effective date in the NPR for infant bath tubs. We 
received no comments on the proposed effective date. Accordingly, the 
final rule will have a 6-month effective date. We note that two recent 
versions of the voluntary standard, ASTM F2670-16 and ASTM F2670-16a, 
both contain a majority of changes that align with the NPR, so 
manufacturers that comply with the voluntary standard will have had a 
year to prepare production to the new federal regulation.

IX. Regulatory Flexibility Act

A. Introduction

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires 
that agencies review a proposed rule and a final rule for the rule's 
potential economic impact on small entities, including small 
businesses. Section 604 of the RFA generally requires that agencies 
prepare a final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) when 
promulgating final rules, unless the head of the agency certifies that 
the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. As discussed in this analysis, adopting ASTM 
F2670-17 without modification would not be expected to have a 
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    For the final rule, the Commission is incorporating by reference 
the voluntary standard for infant bath tubs, ASTM F2670-17, without 
modification. As set forth in section IX.B below, six of the 10 small 
manufacturers and four of the five small importers are already believed 
to be in compliance with the requirements of the voluntary standard. 
Because the products are not complex, modifications

[[Page 15625]]

required to bring the remaining products into compliance should be 
minor. All firms will need to make changes to their product's warning 
labels and use different equipment in the static load test. CPSC 
expects the cost of these modifications to be low. Firms will incur 
additional costs associated with third party testing. However, CPSC 
does not expect the impact of third party testing to be economically 
significant for most firms. Accordingly, the Commission certifies that 
the final rule for infant bath tubs will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

B. Impact on Small Businesses

    Under U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) guidelines, a 
manufacturer of infant bath tubs is small if it has 500 or fewer 
employees, and importers and wholesalers are considered small if they 
have 100 or fewer employees. Based on these guidelines, 16 of the 22 
domestic firms known to be supplying infant bath tubs to the U.S. 
market are small firms--10 manufacturers, five importers, and one firm 
with an unknown supply source.
1. Small Domestic Manufacturers
    The impact of the final rule on small manufacturers will differ, 
based on whether manufacturers' infant bath tubs are already compliant 
with F2670-16. Six domestic manufacturers are in compliance with ASTM 
F2670-16 and are likely to continue to comply with the new voluntary 
standard approved in Janury 2017, ASTM F2670-17. Firms in compliance 
with the voluntary standard will not need to make physical 
modifications to their products, but still will need to make some 
modifications to the warning labels on their products. However, the 
costs of modifying an existing label are usually small.
    Four domestic manufacturers appear to be noncompliant with ASTM 
F2607-16 and will need to modify their products in order to meet ASTM 
F2607-17. The Commission expects product modifications to be minor 
because the products are not complex; the products are generally 
composed of one or two pieces of hard or soft plastic molded together. 
Modifications to meet the standard primarily involve adjusting the size 
of grooves or openings on the side of the product to avoid finger 
entrapment. All firms will need to modify their warning labels to meet 
the mandatory standard. Staff believes 6 months is sufficient time to 
make the necessary changes and the costs associated with doing so are 
low. Therefore, the impact of the final rule is likely to be small for 
most producers who do not comply with ASTM F2607-16.
    Under section 14 of the CPSA, infant bath tubs are also subject to 
third party testing and certification. Once the new requirements become 
effective, all manufacturers will be subject to the additional costs 
associated with the third party testing and certification requirements 
under the testing rule, Testing and Labeling Pertaining to Product 
Certification (16 CFR part 1107). Third party testing will include 
physical and mechanical test requirements specified in the infant bath 
tub final rule; lead and phthalates testing is already required. Third 
party testing costs are in addition to the direct costs of meeting the 
infant bath tub standard.
    Based on testing costs for similar juvenile products, staff 
estimates that testing to the ASTM voluntary standard could cost 
approximately $500-$600 per model sample. On average, each small 
domestic manufacturer supplies three different models of infant bath 
tubs to the U.S. market annually. Therefore, if third party testing 
were conducted every year on a single sample for each model, third 
party testing costs for each manufacturer would be about $1,500-1,800 
annually. Based on a review of firms' revenues and products, the impact 
of third party testing to ASTM F2670-17 would not exceed one percent of 
revenues. Thus, it seems unlikely that the impacts of the rule will be 
economically significant for most small producers.
2. Small Domestic Importers
    Most importers will not experience significant impacts as a result 
of the final rule. The Commission believes that four of the five small 
importers are compliant with the ASTM F2670-16 voluntary standard, and 
therefore only would need to assure that their suppliers make the label 
modifications to comply with the final rule. Complying with the final 
rule could be more difficult for the remaining importer because changes 
beyond simple modifications to the warning label are probably 
necessary. The remaining importer, who is likely not in compliance with 
the voluntary standard, might need to find an alternate source of 
infant bath tubs if their existing suppliers do not come into 
compliance with the requirements of the final rule. Alternatively, this 
firm may discontinue importing infant bath tubs altogether or perhaps 
substitute another product.
    As is the case with manufacturers, all importers will be subject to 
third party testing and certification requirements, and consequently, 
they will experience the associated costs, if their supplying foreign 
firm(s) does not perform third party testing. However, based on firms' 
revenues and on the number of samples that would be required, it is 
unlikely that there will be a significant economic impact due to the 
testing requirements.
    As mentioned above, one small domestic firm has an unknown supply 
source. However, the firm has a diverse product line and claims 
compliance with various standards for several of its other infant 
products. It is possible that the firm's infant bath tub is compliant 
with the current bath tub standard and the firm would only need to 
modify existing warning labels. In any case, this firm should not 
experience large impacts because infant bath tubs are only one of many 
products it supplies. The labeling requirements also apply to 
importers. However, as described above, staff believes firms can easily 
meet this requirement.

X. Environmental Considerations

    The Commission's regulations address whether the agency is required 
to prepare an environmental assessment or an environmental impact 
statement. Under these regulations, a rule that has ``little or no 
potential for affecting the human environment,'' is categorically 
excluded from this requirement. 16 CFR 1021.5(c)(1). The final rule 
falls within the categorical exclusion.

XI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The final rule for infant bath tubs contains information collection 
requirements that are subject to public comment and review by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The preamble to the proposed rule (80 FR 
at 48776-77) discussed the information collection burden of the 
proposed rule and specifically requested comments on the accuracy of 
our estimates. OMB has assigned control number 3041-0171 to this 
information collection. We did not receive any comment regarding the 
information collection burden of the proposal. However, the final rule 
makes modifications regarding the information collection burden because 
the number of estimated manufacturers subject to the information 
collection burden is now estimated at 25 manufacturers rather than the 
26 manufacturers initially estimated in the proposed rule.
    Accordingly, the estimated burden of this collection of information 
is modified as follows:

[[Page 15626]]



                                                       Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Number of       Frequency of     Total annual      Hours per       Total burden
                           16 CFR Section                              respondents       responses        responses         response          hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1234...............................................................              25                3               75                1               75
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Our estimate is based on the following:
    Section 8.1 of ASTM F2670-17 requires that all infant bath tubs and 
their retail packaging be permanently marked or labeled as follows: The 
manufacturer, distributor, or seller name, place of business (city, 
state, mailing address, including zip code), and telephone number; and 
a code mark or other means that identifies the date (month and year as 
a minimum) of manufacture.
    CPSC is aware of 25 firms that supply infant bath tubs in the U.S. 
market. For PRA purposes, we assume that all 25 firms use labels on 
their products and on their packaging already. All firms will need to 
make some modifications to their existing labels. We estimate that the 
time required to make these modifications is about 1 hour per model. 
Each of the 25 firms supplies an average of three different models of 
infant bath tubs. Therefore, we estimate the burden hours associated 
with labels to be 75 hours annually (1 hour x 25 firms x 3 models per 
firm = 75 hours annually).
    We estimate the hourly compensation for the time required to create 
and update labels is $33.30 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 
``Employer Costs for Employee Compensation,'' September 2016, Table 9, 
total compensation for all sales and office workers in goods-producing 
private industries: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/). Therefore, we estimate 
the annual cost to industry associated with the labeling requirements 
in the final rule to be approximately $2,498 ($33.30 per hour x 75 
hours = $2,497.5). This collection of information does not require 
operating, maintenance, or capital costs.
    In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3507(d)), we have submitted the information collection requirements of 
this final rule to the OMB.

XII. Preemption

    Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2075(a), provides that when a 
consumer product safety standard is in effect and applies to a product, 
no state or political subdivision of a state may either establish or 
continue in effect a requirement dealing with the same risk of injury 
unless the state requirement is identical to the federal standard. 
Section 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that states or political 
subdivisions of states may apply to the Commission for an exemption 
from this preemption under certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of the 
CPSIA refers to the rules to be issued under that section as ``consumer 
product safety rules.'' Therefore, the preemption provision of section 
26(a) of the CPSA applies to this final rule issued under section 104.

XIII. Amendment to 16 CFR Part 1112 To Include a Notice of Requirement 
for the Infant Bath Tub Standard

    Section 14(a) of the CPSA imposes the requirement that products 
subject to a consumer product safety rule under the CPSA, or to a 
similar rule, ban, standard, or regulation under any other Act enforced 
by the Commission, must be certified as complying with all applicable 
CPSC-enforced requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Section 14(a)(2) of the 
CPSA requires that certification of children's products subject to a 
children's product safety rule be based on testing conducted by a CPSC-
accepted, third party conformity assessment body. Section 14(a)(3) of 
the CPSA requires the Commission to publish an NOR for the 
accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies (or 
laboratories) to assess conformity with a children's product safety 
rule to which a children's product is subject. The Safety Standard for 
Infant Bath Tubs, to be codified at 16 CFR part 1234, is a children's 
product safety rule that requires the issuance of an NOR.
    The Commission published a final rule, Requirements Pertaining to 
Third-Party Conformity Assessment Bodies, 78 FR 15836 (March 12, 2013), 
which is codified at 16 CFR part 1112 (referred to here as part 1112). 
Part 1112 became effective on June 10, 2013 and establishes 
requirements for accreditation of third-party conformity assessment 
bodies (or laboratories) to test for conformance with a children's 
product safety rule in accordance with section 14(a)(2) of the CPSA. 
Part 1112 also codifies a list of all of the NORs that the CPSC had 
published at the time part 1112 was issued. All NORs issued after the 
Commission published part 1112, such as the standard for infant bath 
tubs, require the Commission to amend part 1112. Accordingly, the 
Commission is now amending part 1112 to include the standard for infant 
bath tubs in the list of other children's product safety rules for 
which the CPSC has issued NORs.
    Laboratories applying for acceptance as a CPSC-accepted third-party 
conformity assessment body to test to the new standard for infant bath 
tubs would be required to meet the third-party conformity assessment 
body accreditation requirements in 16 CFR part 1112, Requirements 
Pertaining to Third-Party Conformity Assessment Bodies. When a 
laboratory meets the requirements as a CPSC-accepted third-party 
conformity assessment body, the laboratory can apply to the CPSC to 
have 16 CFR part 1234, Safety Standard for Infant Bath Tubs, included 
in its scope of accreditation of CPSC safety rules listed for the 
laboratory on the CPSC Web site at: www.cpsc.gov/labsearch.
    As required by the RFA, staff conducted a FRFA when the Commission 
issued the part 1112 rule (78 FR 15836, 15855-58). Briefly, the FRFA 
concluded that the accreditation requirements would not have a 
significant adverse impact on a substantial number of small test 
laboratories because no requirements were imposed on test laboratories 
that did not intend to provide third-party testing services. The only 
test laboratories that were expected to provide such services were 
those that anticipated receiving sufficient revenue from the mandated 
testing to justify accepting the requirements as a business decision. 
Moreover, a test laboratory would only choose to provide such services 
if it anticipated receiving revenues sufficient to cover the costs of 
the requirements.
    Based on similar reasoning, amending 16 CFR part 1112 to include 
the NOR for the infant bath tubs standard will not have a significant 
adverse impact on small test laboratories. Moreover, based upon the 
number of test laboratories in the United States that have applied for 
CPSC acceptance of accreditation to test for conformance to other 
mandatory juvenile product standards, we expect that only a few test 
laboratories will seek CPSC acceptance of their accreditation to test 
for conformance with the infant bath tub standard. Most of these test 
laboratories will have

[[Page 15627]]

already been accredited to test for conformity to other mandatory 
juvenile product standards, and the only costs to them would be the 
cost of adding the infant bath tubs standard to their scope of 
accreditation. For these reasons, the Commission certifies that the NOR 
amending 16 CFR part 1112 to include the infant bath tubs standard will 
not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.

List of Subjects

16 CFR Part 1112

    Administrative practice and procedure, Audit, Consumer protection, 
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Third-party conformity assessment body.

16 CFR Part 1234

    Consumer protection, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Infants 
and children, Labeling, Law enforcement, bath tub, and Toys.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission amends 
Title 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 1112--REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THIRD PARTY CONFORMITY 
ASSESSMENT BODIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 1112 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2063; Pub. L. 110-314, section 3, 122 
Stat. 3016, 3017 (2008).


0
2. Amend Sec.  1112.15 by adding paragraph (b)(41) to read as follows:


Sec.  1112.15   When can a third party conformity assessment body apply 
for CPSC acceptance for a particular CPSC rule and/or test method?

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (41) 16 CFR part 1234, Safety Standard for Infant Bath Tubs.
* * * * *

0
3. Add part 1234 to read as follows:

PART 1234--SAFETY STANDARD FOR INFANT BATH TUBS

Sec.
1234.1 Scope.
1234.2 Requirements for infant bath tubs.

    Authority:  The Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, 
Pub. L. 110-314, 104, 122 Stat. 3016 (August 14, 2008); Pub. L. 112-
28, 125 Stat. 273 (August 12, 2011).


Sec.  1234.1   Scope.

    This part establishes a consumer product safety standard for infant 
bath tubs.


Sec.  1234.2   Requirements for infant bath tubs.

    Each infant bath tub must comply with all applicable provisions of 
ASTM F2670-17, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for Infant Bath 
Tubs, approved on January 1, 2017. The Director of the Federal Register 
approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM 
International, 100 Bar Harbor Drive, P.O. Box 0700, West Conshohocken, 
PA 19428; http://www.astm.org/. You may inspect a copy at the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone 301-504-7923, or at 
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For 
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Dated: March 27, 2017.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017-06270 Filed 3-29-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6355-01-P