[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 94268-94270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31019]
[[Page 94268]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 413, 414 and 494
[CMS-1651-CN]
Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive
Program; Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and
Supplies Competitive Bidding Program Bid Surety Bonds, State Licensure,
and Appeals Process for Breach of Contract Actions; Correction
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects technical and typographical errors that
appeared in the final rule published in the Federal Register on
November 4, 2016, entitled ``Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease
Prospective Payment System, Coverage and Payment for Renal Dialysis
Services Furnished to Individuals with Acute Kidney Injury, End-Stage
Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program, Durable Medical Equipment,
Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies Competitive Bidding Program Bid
Surety Bonds, State Licensure and Appeals Process for Breach of
Contract Actions, Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and
Supplies Competitive Bidding Program and Fee Schedule Adjustments,
Access to Care Issues for Durable Medical Equipment; and the
Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care Model.''
DATES: This correction is effective on January 1, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Howard, (410) 786-8645, for
issues related to DMEPOS CBP and bid surety bonds, state licensure, and
the appeals process for breach of DMEPOS CBP contract actions.
Stephanie Frilling, (410) 786-4507, for issues related to the ESRD QIP.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2016-26152 of November 4, 2016 (81 FR 77834)
(hereinafter referred to as the CY 2017 ESRD PPS final rule) there are
technical and typographical errors that are discussed in the ``Summary
of Errors,'' and further identified and corrected in the ``Correction
of Errors'' section below. The provisions in this correction notice are
effective as if they had been included in the CY 2017 ESRD PPS final
rule published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2016.
II. Summary of Errors
On page 77874, we inadvertently made technical errors with respect
to the calculation of the performance standard values in Table 2,
``Improvement of Performance Standards Over Time.''
On page 77886, we inadvertently made technical errors with respect
to the calculation based on the most recently available data of the
Achievement Threshold and Performance Standard values that apply to the
Kt/V Composite, Standardized Transfusion Ratio and Hypercalcemia
measures, and the calculation based on the most recently available data
of the Achievement Threshold, Benchmark and Performance Standard values
that apply to the ICH CAHPS measure in Table 6, ``Finalized Numerical
Values for the Performance Standards for the PY 2019 ESRD QIP Clinical
Measures Using the Most Recently Available Data.'' We also
inadvertently included values for the Achievement Threshold, Benchmark
and Performance Standard for the Standardized Hospitalization Ratio
Clinical Measure, which is not a measure that we have adopted for the
PY 2019 program.
On page 77897, we inadvertently included values for the
Standardized Hospitalization Ratio Clinical Measure, which is not a
finalized PY 2019 ESRD QIP measure, in Table 12, ``PY 2020 Clinical
Measure Including Facilities With at Least 11 Eligible Patients Per
Measure.''
On page 77932 we made a technical error in our response to the
first comment under ``1. Bid Surety Bond Requirement''. In our
response, we stated ``While we acknowledge that there will be a number
of entities that are required to make large expenditures in order to
obtain a bid surety bond for each CBA in which they are submitting a
bid, we anticipate that this revision on the bid surety bond amount
from $100,000 to $50,000 will reduce that overall burden on all
suppliers.'' We inadvertently included the term ``suppliers'' at the
end of the sentence but the term should read ``bidders.''
On page 77933 in our response to the comment on why the bid surety
bond was only required until January 1, 2019, we inadvertently included
a ``1'' in the reference to the round of competition in 2019 in which
the bid surety bond requirement commences. The reference should read
``Round 2019'' and not ``Round 1 2019.''
At the top of page 77934 in our discussion on ``Appeals Process for
a DMEPOS Competitive Bidding Breach of Contract Action'' we repeated a
typographical error from the proposed rule (81 FR 42849) by stating
that we proposed removing ``Sec. 414.423(g)(2)(i)'' from the
regulation. The correct citation in this discussion should read ``Sec.
414.422(g)(2)(i)'', consistent with the proposal to remove corrective
action plan from the list of actions for a breach of contract in the
regulation, as described in the preamble and regulation text of the
proposed and final rules (81 FR 42849, 42878, and 81 FR 77934, 77967).
III. Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking, 60-Day Comment Period, and Delay of
Effective Date
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
the agency is required to publish a notice of the proposed rule in the
Federal Register before the provisions of a rule take effect.
Similarly, section 1871(b)(1) of the Act requires the Secretary to
provide notice of the proposed rule in the Federal Register and provide
a period of not less than 60 days for public comment. In addition,
section 553(d) of the APA, and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(i) of the Act
mandate a 30-day delay in effective date after issuance or publication
of a rule. Sections 553(b)(B) and 553(d)(3) of the APA provide for
exceptions from the notice and comment and delay in effective date. APA
requirements; in cases in which these exceptions apply, sections
1871(b)(2)(C) and 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act provide exceptions from
the notice and 60-day comment period and delay in effective date
requirements as well. Section 553(b)(B) of the APA and section
1871(b)(2)(C) of the Act authorize an agency to dispense with normal
rulemaking requirements for good cause if the agency makes a finding
that the notice and comment process are impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest. In addition, both section 553(d)(3) of
the APA and section 1871(e)(1)(B)(ii) of the Act allow the agency to
avoid the 30-day delay in effective date where such delay is contrary
to the public interest and an agency includes a statement of support.
In our view, this correcting document does not constitute
rulemaking that would be subject to these requirements. This correcting
document is simply correcting technical errors in the preamble and does
not make substantive changes to the policies or payment methodologies
that were adopted in the final rule, and therefore, it is unnecessary
to follow the notice and comment procedure in this instance.
[[Page 94269]]
Even if this were a rulemaking to which the notice and comment and
delayed effective date requirements applied, we find that there is good
cause to waive such requirements. Undertaking further notice and
comment procedures to incorporate the corrections in this document into
the CY 2017 ESRD PPS final rule or delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest because it is in the public's interest
for dialysis facilities to receive appropriate payments in as timely a
manner as possible, and to ensure that the CY 2017 ESRD PPS final rule
accurately reflects our policies as of the date they take effect and
are applicable. Further, such procedures would be unnecessary, because
we are not altering the payment methodologies or policies. For these
reasons, we believe we have good cause to waive the notice and comment
and effective date requirements.
IV. Correction of Errors
In FR Doc. 2016-26152 of November 4, 2016 (81 FR 77834), we make
the following corrections:
1. On page 77874, Table 2 is corrected to read as follows:
Table 2--Improvement of Performance Standards Over Time
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measure PY 2015 PY 2016 PY 2017 PY 2018 PY 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hemoglobin >12 g/dL............. 1% 0% .............. .............. ..............
Vascular Access Type:
% Fistula................... 60% 62.3% 64.46% 65.94% 65.93%
% Catheter.................. 13% 10.6% 9.92% 8.80% 9.19%
Kt/V:
Adult Hemodialysis.......... 93% 93.4% 96.89% 97.24% ..............
Adult Peritoneal Dialysis... 84% 85.7% 87.10% 89.47% ..............
Pediatric Hemodialysis...... 93% 93% 94.44% 93.94% ..............
Pediatric Peritoneal .............. .............. .............. 72.60% ..............
Dialysis...................
Hypercalcemia................... .............. 1.70% 1.30% 1.19% 1.85%
NHSN Bloodstream Infection SIR.. .............. .............. .............. 0.861 0.797
Standardized Readmission Ratio.. .............. .............. 0.998 0.998 0.998
Standardized Transfusion Ratio.. .............. .............. .............. 0.923 0.894
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. On page 77886, Table 6 is corrected to read as follows:
Table 6--Finalized Numerical Values for the Performance Standards for the PY 2019 ESRD QIP Clinical Measures
Using the Most Recently Available Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achievement Performance
Measure threshold Benchmark standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vascular Access Type:
%Fistula........................................... 53.66% 79.62% 65.93%
%Catheter.......................................... 17.20% 2.95% 9.19%
Kt/V Composite......................................... 86.99% 97.74% 93.08%
Hypercalcemia.......................................... 4.24% 0.32% 1.85%
Standardized Transfusion Ratio......................... 1.488 0.421 0.901
Standardized Readmission Ratio......................... 1.289 0.624 0.998
NHSN Bloodstream Infection............................. 1.738 0 0.797
ICH CAHPS: Nephrologists' Communication and Caring..... 56.41% 77.06% 65.89%
ICH CAHPS: Quality of Dialysis Center Care and 52.88% 71.21% 60.75%
Operations............................................
ICH CAHPS: Providing Information to Patients........... 72.09% 85.55% 78.59%
ICH CAHPS: Overall Rating of Nephrologists............. 49.33% 76.57% 62.22%
ICH CAHPS: Overall Rating of Dialysis Center Staff..... 48.84% 77.42% 62.26%
ICH CAHPS: Overall Rating of the Dialysis Facility..... 51.18% 80.58% 65.13%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data Sources: VAT measures: 2015 Medicare claims; SRR, STrR: 2015 Medicare claims; Kt/V: 2015 Medicare claims
and 2015 CROWNWEB; Hypercalcemia: 2015 CROWNWeb; NHSN: CDC; CAHPS: 2015 ICH CAHPS surveys.
[[Page 94270]]
3. On page 77897, Table 12 is corrected to read as follows:
Table 12--PY 2020 Clinical Measures Including Facilities With at Least 11 Eligible Patients per Measure
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statistically
Measure N 75th/25th 90th/10th Std error Indistin- Truncated Truncated TCV TCV's 0.10
Percentile Percentile guishable mean SD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kt/V Delivered Dose above 6210 96.0 98.0 0.093 No.............. 92.5 4.20 0.05 Yes.
minimum.
Fistula Use.................... 5906 73.2 79.6 0.148 No.............. 65.7 8.88 0.14 No.
Catheter Use................... 5921 5.43 2.89 0.093 No.............. \1\ 90.1 5.16 <0.01 Yes.
Serum Calcium >10.2............ 6257 0.91 0.32 0.049 No.............. \1\ 97.8 1.48 <0.01 Yes.
NHSN--SIR...................... 5781 0.41 0.00 0.011 No.............. 0.963 0.57 <0.01 Yes.
SRR............................ 5739 0.82 0.64 0.004 No.............. 0.995 0.21 <0.01 Yes.
STrR........................... 5650 0.64 0.43 0.008 No.............. 0.965 0.37 <0.01 Yes.
ICH CAHPS:
Nephrologists communication and 3349 71.8 77.1 0.159 No.............. 65.7 7.11 0.11 No.
caring.
Quality of dialysis center care 3349 66.2 71.2 0.134 No.............. 60.9 6.20 0.10 No.
and operations.
Providing information to 3349 82.4 85.6 0.101 No.............. 78.4 4.61 0.06 Yes.
patients.
Rating of Nephrologist......... 3349 69.9 76.6 0.204 No.............. 62.0 9.29 0.15 No.
Rating of dialysis facility 3349 70.9 77.4 0.215 No.............. 62.0 9.92 0.16 No.
staff.
Rating of dialysis center...... 3349 73.8 80.6 0.221 No.............. 64.8 10.18 0.16 No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Truncated mean for percentage is reversed (100 percent-truncated mean) for measures where lower score = better performance.
4. On page 77932, third column, line 17, the word ``suppliers'' is
corrected to read as ``bidders''.
5. On page 77933, first column, line 30, remove the number ``1''
before ``2019''.
6. On page 77934, first column, line 3, the citation ``Sec.
414.423(g)(2)(i)'' is corrected to read ``Sec. 414.422(g)(2)(i)''.
Dated: December 19, 2016.
Madhura Valverde,
Executive Secretary to the Department, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-31019 Filed 12-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P