[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 176 (Monday, September 12, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62668-62672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21145]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2014-0059; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-075-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170 airplanes. The NPRM
proposed to supersede AD 2012-07-08, which requires revising the
maintenance or inspection program to incorporate structural inspection
requirements. The NPRM was prompted by a determination that more
restrictive maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations are
necessary. Since the NPRM was issued, a new revision of the
airworthiness limitations section (ALS) of the EMBRAER S.A. ERJ 170/175
Maintenance Review Board Report (MRBR) was issued, which contains more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. This action revises the NPRM by
proposing to require revising the maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate the new ALS of the MRBR. This supplemental
NPRM (SNPRM) would also remove certain airplanes from the
applicability. In addition, we propose to supersede AD 2006-06-09, AD
2012-05-08, and AD 2012-07-08, which require tasks that are now
included in the new revision of the MRBR. We are proposing
[[Page 62669]]
this SNPRM to detect and correct fatigue cracking of various principal
structural elements; such cracking could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane. We are also proposing this SNPRM to prevent
safety-significant latent failures; such failures, in combination with
one or more other specified failures or events, could result in a
hazardous or catastrophic failure condition of avionics, hydraulic
systems, fire detection systems, fuel systems, or other critical
systems. In addition, we are also proposing this SNPRM to prevent the
potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent
failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions; such failures,
in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the airplane. Since these actions
impose an additional burden over those proposed in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment
on these proposed changes.
DATES: We must receive comments on this SNPRM by October 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Embraer S.A., Technical Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos--SP--
BRASIL; telephone +55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax +55 12
3927-7546; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.flyembraer.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0059; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Martinez Hueto, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
telephone 425-227-1622; fax 425-227-1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0059;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-075-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We issued a NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170 airplanes. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on February 27, 2014 (79 FR 11013) (``the
NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a determination that more restrictive
maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations were necessary.
The NPRM proposed to require a revision to the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate new inspections.
Actions Since Previous NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, a new revision to the ALS of the EMBRAER
S.A. ERJ 170/175 MRBR was issued, which contains more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation authority for
Brazil, has issued Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2015-06-01,
effective June 2, 2015 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition on certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170 airplanes. The
MCAI states:
This [Brazilian] AD was prompted by a new revision to the
airworthiness limitations of the Maintenance Review Board Report.
This [Brazilian] AD is being issued to ensure that fatigue cracking
of various principal structural elements is detected and corrected;
such fatigue cracking, could adversely affect the structural
integrity of these airplanes.
The required action is revising the maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the airworthiness limitations in Appendix
A--``Airworthiness Limitations;'' to the EMBRAER 170/175 Maintenance
Review Board Report, MRB-1621, Revision 10, dated February 23, 2015,
which is divided into four parts: Part 1--Certification Maintenance
Requirements, Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Inspections, Part 3--
Fuel System Limitation Items, and Part 4--Life Limited Parts. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0059.
This SNPRM also proposes to supersede AD 2006-06-09, Amendment 39-
14518 (71 FR 14365, March 22, 2006); AD 2012-05-08, Amendment 39-16980
(77 FR 16155, March 20, 2012); and AD 2012-07-08, Amendment 39-17014
(77 FR 24342, April 24, 2012); which require tasks that are now
included in the new revision of the MRBR.
This SNPRM also proposes to remove airplanes with an original
airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or after February 23, 2015, from the
applicability.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Embraer S.A. has issued Part 1--``Certification Maintenance
Requirements;'' Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation Inspections (ALI)--
Structures;'' Part 3--``Fuel System Limitation Items;'' and Part 4--
``Life Limited Items;'' of Appendix A--``Airworthiness Limitations;''
to the EMBRAER 170/175 Maintenance Review Board Report, MRB-1621,
Revision 10, dated February 23, 2015. This service information
describes airworthiness limitations (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
of the MRBR make up
[[Page 62670]]
the airworthiness limitations). This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this proposed AD. We considered the comment received.
Request To Refer to Revised Service Information
An anonymous commenter noted that paragraph (i) of the proposed AD
(in the NPRM) included terminating action(s) for the requirements of
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) if a revision to the
maintenance or inspection program was accomplished by the incorporation
of the tasks in Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation Inspections (ALI)--
Structures,'' of the EMBRAER 170 Maintenance Review Board Report, MRB-
1621, Revision 8, dated August 20, 2012. The commenter stated that
since August 20, 2012, five additional temporary revisions to Part 2
had been issued and the NPRM did not include the incorporation of these
temporary revisions as being acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM). We
infer that the commenter is requesting that the NPRM be revised to
allow incorporation of the tasks in the current service information
into an operator's maintenance or inspection program and that this
should be acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph
(g) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM).
We agree with the commenter's request to refer to the current
revision of the EMBRAER 170/175 MRBR, which includes the temporary
revisions mentioned by the commenter. Paragraph (i) of this proposed AD
has been revised to refer to the EMBRAER 170/175 Maintenance Review
Board Report, MRB-1621, Revision 10, dated February 23, 2015.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This SNPRM
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and
Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs). Compliance
with these actions and CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(k)(1) of this proposed AD. The request should include a description of
changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued
damage tolerance of the affected structure.
Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational requirements,
components that have been identified as airworthy or installed on the
affected airplanes before accomplishing the revision of the airplane
maintenance or inspection program specified in this proposed AD, do not
need to be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs. However, once the
airplane maintenance or inspection program has been revised as required
by this proposed AD, future maintenance actions on these components
must be done in accordance with the CDCCLs.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on
this SNPRM.
Airworthiness Limitations Based on Type Design
The FAA recently became aware of an issue related to the
applicability of ADs that require incorporation of an ALS revision into
an operator's maintenance or inspection program.
Typically, when these types of ADs are issued by civil aviation
authorities of other countries, they apply to all airplanes covered
under an identified type certificate (TC). The corresponding FAA AD
typically retains applicability to all of those airplanes.
In addition, U.S. operators must operate their airplanes in an
airworthy condition, in accordance with 14 CFR 91.7(a). Included in
this obligation is the requirement to perform any maintenance or
inspections specified in the ALS, and in accordance with the ALS as
specified in 14 CFR 43.16 and 91.403(c), unless an alternative has been
approved by the FAA.
When a type certificate is issued for a type design, the specific
ALS, including revisions, is a part of that type design, as specified
in 14 CFR 21.31(c).
The sum effect of these operational and maintenance requirements is
an obligation to comply with the ALS defined in the type design
referenced in the manufacturer's conformity statement. This obligation
may introduce a conflict with an AD that requires a specific ALS
revision if new airplanes are delivered with a later revision as part
of their type design.
To address this conflict, the FAA has approved alternative methods
of compliance (AMOCs) that allow operators to incorporate the most
recent ALS revision into their maintenance/inspection programs, in lieu
of the ALS revision required by the AD. This eliminates the conflict
and enables the operator to comply with both the AD and the type
design.
However, compliance with AMOCs is normally optional, and we
recently became aware that some operators choose to retain the AD-
mandated ALS revision in their fleet-wide maintenance/inspection
programs, including those for new airplanes delivered with later ALS
revisions, to help standardize the maintenance of the fleet. To ensure
that operators comply with the applicable ALS revision for newly
delivered airplanes containing a later revision than that specified in
an AD, we plan to limit the applicability of ADs that mandate ALS
revisions to those airplanes that are subject to an earlier revision of
the ALS, either as part of the type design or as mandated by an earlier
AD.
This proposed AD, therefore, would apply to Model ERJ 170 airplanes
with an original certificate of airworthiness or original export
certificate of airworthiness that was issued before the date of
approval of the ALS revision identified in this proposed AD (airplanes
having serial numbers 17000002, 17000004 through 17000013 inclusive,
and 17000015 through 17000453 inclusive). Operators of airplanes with
an original certificate of airworthiness or original export certificate
of airworthiness issued on or after that date must comply with the
airworthiness limitations specified as part of the approved type design
and referenced on the type certificate data sheet.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this SNPRM affects 286 airplanes of U.S. registry.
[[Page 62671]]
The actions that are required by AD 2012-07-08, Amendment 39-17014
(77 FR 24342, April 24, 2012), and retained in this SNPRM take about 1
work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the actions that were required by AD 2012-07-08 is
$85 per product.
We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the new basic requirements of this SNPRM. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this SNPRM on
U.S. operators to be $24,310, or $85 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing airworthiness directives AD 2006-06-09, Amendment 39-14518
(71 FR 14365, March 22, 2006); AD 2012-0508, Amendment 39-16980 (77 FR
16155, March 20, 2012); and AD 2012-07-08, Amendment 39-17014 (77 FR
24342, April 24, 2012); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Embraer S.A: Docket No. FAA-2014-0059; Directorate Identifier 2013-
NM-075-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by October 27, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces the ADs specified in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2),
and (b)(3) of this AD:
(1) AD 2006-06-09, Amendment 39-14518 (71 FR 14365, March 22,
2006) (``AD 2006-06-06'').
(2) AD 2012-05-08, Amendment 39-16980 (77 FR 16155, March 20,
2012) (``AD 2012-05-08'').
(3) AD 2012-07-08, Amendment 39--17014 (77 FR 24342, April 24,
2012) (``AD 2012-07-08'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD,
-100 SE, and -100 SU airplanes; and Model ERJ 170-200 LR, -200 SU,
and -200 STD airplanes; certificated in any category; manufacturer
serial numbers 17000002, 17000004 through 17000013 inclusive, and
17000015 through 17000453 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Codes 27, Flight
controls; 28, Fuel; 52, Doors; 53, Fuselage; 54, Nacelles/pylons;
55, Stabilizers; 57, Wings; 71, Powerplant; and 78, Exhaust.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination that more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct fatigue cracking of various principal structural
elements; such cracking could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane. We are also issuing this AD to prevent safety-
significant latent failures; such failures, in combination with one
or more other specified failures or events, could result in a
hazardous or catastrophic failure condition of avionics, hydraulic
systems, fire detection systems, fuel systems, or other critical
systems. We are also issuing this AD to prevent the potential for
ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions; such failures, in
combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank
explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Maintenance Program Revision, With No Changes
This paragraph restates the action required by paragraph (i) of
AD 2012-07-08, with no changes.
(1) Within 60 days after May 29, 2012 (the effective date of AD
2012-07-08): Revise the maintenance program to incorporate the new
or revised tasks specified in Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation
Inspection (ALI)--Structures,'' of Appendix A, ``Airworthiness
Limitations,'' to the EMBRAER 170 MRBR, MRB-1621, Revision 7, dated
November 11, 2010; and EMBRAER Temporary Revision (TR) 7-1, dated
February 11, 2011, to Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation Inspection
(ALI)--Structures,'' of Appendix A, ``Airworthiness Limitations,''
to the EMBRAER 170 MRBR, MRB-1621, Revision 7, dated November 11,
2010; with the initial compliance times and intervals specified in
these documents.
(2) The initial compliance times for the tasks start from the
date of issuance of the original Brazilian airworthiness certificate
or the date of issuance of the original Brazilian export certificate
of airworthiness of the applicable airplane at the applicable time
specified in the tasks, or within 600 flight cycles after revising
the maintenance program, whichever occurs later. For certain tasks,
the compliance times depend on the pre-modification and post-
modification status of the actions specified in the associated
service bulletin, as specified in the ``Applicability'' column of
Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)--Structures,''
of Appendix A, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' to the EMBRAER 170
MRBR, MRB-1621, Revision 7, dated November 11, 2010; and Embraer
Temporary Revision 7-1, dated February 11, 2011, to Part 2--
``Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)--Structures,'' of
Appendix A, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' to the EMBRAER 170 MRBR,
MRB-1621, Revision 7, dated November 11, 2010.
(h) Retained No Alternative Actions Intervals, and/or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs), With New Exception
This paragraph restates the action required by paragraph (j) of
AD 2012-07-08, with a new exception. Except as required by
[[Page 62672]]
paragraph (i) of this AD, after accomplishing the revisions required
by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used other than those
specified in Part 2--Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)--
Structures, of Appendix A, Airworthiness Limitations, of the EMBRAER
170 MRBR MRB-1621, Revision 7, dated November 11, 2010; and EMBRAER
Temporary Revision 7-1, dated February 11, 2011, to Part 2--
Airworthiness Limitation Inspection (ALI)--Structures, of Appendix
A, Airworthiness Limitations, of the EMBRAER 170 MRBR MRB-1621,
Revision 7, unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(i) New Revision of Maintenance or Inspection Program
Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the
airworthiness limitations specified in Part 1--``Certification
Maintenance Requirements;'' Part 2--``Airworthiness Limitation
Inspections (ALI)--Structures;'' Part 3--``Fuel System Limitation
Items;'' and Part 4--``Life Limited Items;'' of Appendix A--
``Airworthiness Limitations;'' of the EMBRAER 170/175 MRBR, MRB-
1621, Revision 10, dated February 23, 2015. The initial compliance
times and repetitive intervals are specified in the applicable part
of the EMBRAER 170/175 MRBR, MRB-1621, Revision 10, dated February
23, 2015. Accomplishing the revision to the maintenance or
inspection program required by this paragraph terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(j) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, CDCCLs
After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (i) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Ana Martinez
Hueto, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-1622; fax 425-227-1320. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC); or ANAC's authorized Designee.
If approved by the ANAC Designee, the approval must include the
Designee's authorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
Brazilian Airworthiness Directive 2015-06-01, effective June 2,
2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0059.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Embraer S.A., Technical Publications Section (PC 060), Av.
Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170--Putim--12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos
Campos--SP--BRASIL; telephone +55 12 3927-5852 or +55 12 3309-0732;
fax +55 12 3927-7546; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.flyembraer.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 25, 2016.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-21145 Filed 9-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P