[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 51899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18566]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 1623034, Docket No. C-4580]
Very Incognito Technologies, Inc., Doing Business as Vipvape
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Consent order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission has approved a final consent order in this
matter, settling alleged violations of federal law prohibiting
deceptive acts or practices. The attached Analysis to Aid Public
Comment describes both the allegations in the Complaint and the terms
of the Decision and Order.
DATES: Issued on June 21, 2016.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'') has
approved a final consent order applicable to Very Incognito
Technologies, Inc. dba Vipvape (``Vipvape'').
The consent order was placed on the public record for thirty (30)
days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments received
during this period became part of the public record. After the public
comment period, the Commission reviewed the agreement and the comments
received, and determined to make the proposed order final.
This matter concerns allegedly false representations that Vipvape
made to consumers concerning its participation in the Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation (``APEC'') Cross Border Privacy Rules (``CBPR'')
system. The APEC CBPR system is a voluntary, enforceable mechanism that
certifies a company's compliance with the principles in the CBPR and
facilitates privacy-respecting transfers of data amongst APEC member
economies. The APEC CBPR system is based on nine data privacy
principles: Preventing harm, notice, collection limitation, use choice,
integrity, security safeguards, access and correction, and
accountability. Companies that seek to participate in the APEC CBPR
system must undergo a review by an APEC-recognized Accountability
Agent, which certifies companies that meet the standards.
Companies under the FTC's jurisdiction are eligible to apply for
APEC CBPR certification. The names of certified companies are posted on
a public-facing Web site, www.cbprs.org. Companies must re-apply
annually in order to retain their status as current participants in the
APEC CBPR system. A company that falsely claims APEC CBPR participation
may be subject to an enforcement action based on the FTC's deception
authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act.
Vipvape makes and distributes hand-held vaporizers. According to
the Commission's complaint, Vipvape has set forth on its Web site,
https://www.vipvape.com/content/legal/warranty/privacy, privacy
policies and statements about its practices, including statements
related to its participation in the APEC CBPR system.
The Commission's complaint alleges that Vipvape falsely represented
that it was a participant in the APEC CBPR system when, in fact, it
never sought or obtained certification.
Part I of the order prohibits Vipvape from making
misrepresentations about its participation in any privacy or security
program sponsored by a government or any self-regulatory or standard-
setting organization, including, but not limited to, the APEC CBPR
system.
Parts II through VI of the order are reporting and compliance
provisions. Part II requires acknowledgment of the order and
dissemination of the order now and in the future to persons with
responsibilities relating to the subject matter of the order. Part III
ensures notification to the FTC of changes in corporate status and
mandates that Vipvape submit an initial compliance report to the FTC.
Part IV requires Vipvape to retain documents relating to its compliance
with the order for a five-year period. Part V mandates that Vipvape
make available to the FTC information or subsequent compliance reports,
as requested. Part VI is a provision that ``sunsets'' the order on June
21, 2036, with certain exceptions.
The purpose of this analysis, which was placed on the Commission
Web site on May 4, 2016, was to facilitate public comment on the
proposed order. It is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the complaint or order or to modify the order's terms
in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-18566 Filed 8-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P