[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48864-48869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78375; File No. SR-BX-2016-034]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 
Affiliated Entities

July 20, 2016.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on July 8, 2016, NASDAQ BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the 
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which 
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing 
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from 
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 48865]]

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's transaction fees at 
chapter XV to permit certain affiliated market participants to 
aggregate eligible volume to all pricing in chapter XV, section 2(1) 
for which a volume threshold or volume percentage is required to obtain 
the pricing.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office 
of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to permit certain 
affiliated market participants to aggregate volume in chapter XV, 
section 2(1) for which a volume threshold or volume percentage is 
required to obtain the pricing and qualify for various pricing 
incentives. The Exchange's proposal is intended to incentivize 
Participants to submit for execution a greater amount of order flow on 
BX to obtain more advantageous pricing.
Affiliated Entity
    The Exchange proposes to add three definitions to chapter XV of BX 
Options Rules. The Exchange proposes to define the terms ``Appointed 
MM,'' ``Appointed OFP'' and ``Affiliated Entity.'' The Exchange 
proposes to define the term ``Appointed MM'' as a BX Options Market 
Maker \3\ who has been appointed by an Order Flow Provider (``OFP'') 
for purposes of qualifying as an Affiliated Entity. An OFP means is a 
Participant that submits orders, as agent or principal, to the 
Exchange.\4\ The Exchange proposes to define the term ``Appointed OFP'' 
as an OFP who has been appointed by a BX Options Market Maker for 
purposes of qualifying as an Affiliated Entity. The Exchange proposes 
to define the term ``Affiliated Entity'' as a relationship between an 
Appointed MM and an Appointed OFP for purposes of aggregating eligible 
volume for pricing in chapter XV, section 2(1) for which a volume 
threshold or volume percentage is required to qualify for higher 
rebates or lower fees. In order to become an Affiliated Entity, BX 
Options Market Makers and OFPs will be required to send an email to the 
Exchange to appoint their counterpart, at least 3 business days prior 
to the last day of the month to qualify for the next month.\5\ For 
example, with this proposal, market participants may submit emails to 
the Exchange to become Affiliated Entities eligible to qualify for 
discounted pricing starting August 1, 2016, provided the emails are 
sent at least 3 business days prior to the first business day of August 
2016. The Exchange will acknowledge receipt of the emails and specify 
the date the Affiliated Entity is eligible for applicable pricing in 
chapter XV, section 2(1). Each Affiliated Entity relationship will 
commence on the 1st of a month and may not be terminated prior to the 
end of any month. An Affiliated Entity relationship will terminate 
after a one (1) year period, unless either party terminates earlier in 
writing by sending an email to the Exchange at least 3 business days 
prior to the last day of the month to terminate for the next month. 
Affiliated Entity relationships must be renewed annually. For example, 
if the start date of the Affiliated Entity relationship is August 1, 
2016, the counterparties may determine to commence a new relationship 
as of August 1, 2017 by sending two new emails by July 27, 2017 (3 
business days prior to the end of the month). Participants under Common 
Ownership \6\ may not qualify as a counterparty comprising an 
Affiliated Entity. Each Participant may qualify for only one (1) 
Affiliated Entity relationship at any given time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``BX Options Market Maker'' or (``M'') is a 
Participant that has registered as a Market Maker on BX Options 
pursuant to chapter VII, Section 2, and must also remain in good 
standing pursuant to chapter VII, section 4. In order to receive 
Market Maker pricing in all securities, the Participant must be 
registered as a BX Options Market Maker in at least one security.
    \4\ Market Makers submitting quotes to the Exchange shall not be 
considered Appointed OFPs for the purpose of becoming an Affiliated 
Entity.
    \5\ The Exchange shall issue an Options Trader Alert specifying 
the email address and details required to apply to become an 
Affiliated Entity. Once the Exchange receives both emails, from the 
Affiliated [sic] MM and the Affiliated [sic] OFP, the Exchange will 
send a confirming email with the date of approval of the one (1) 
year term.
    \6\ The term ``Common Ownership'' means Participants under 75% 
common ownership or control. See chapter XV. Participants that are 
under 75% common ownership or control shall be considered under 
Common Ownership for purposes of pricing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, an Affiliated Entity shall be eligible to aggregate 
their volume for purposes of qualifying for certain pricing in chapter 
XV, section 2(1) for which a volume threshold or volume percentage is 
required to obtain a higher rebate or lower fee. With this proposal, 
Affiliated Entities will be eligible to tier pricing in section 2(1) in 
both Penny and Non-Penny Pilot Options.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See BX Rules at Section 2(1) of chapter XV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chapter XV, Section 2(1)--Penny Pilot and Non-Penny Pilot Options 
Pricing
    Currently, the Exchange offers Customers,\8\ when trading with Non-
Customers,\9\ BX Options Market Makers or Firms \10\ the ability to 
obtain higher Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity in Penny 
Pilot Options Tiers Schedule which exclude Select Symbols (``non-Select 
Symbols'') with a tiered pricing model.\11\ Also, the Exchange offers 
Customers, when trading with Customers, Non-Customers, BX Options 
Market Makers or Firms the ability to obtain higher Penny Pilot Options 
Rebates to Remove Liquidity in non-Select Symbols with a tiered pricing 
model.\12\ Finally, the Exchange offers BX Options Market Makers, when 
trading with Customers the ability to obtain lower Penny Pilot Options 
Fees to Remove Liquidity in non-Select Symbols with a tiered pricing 
model. \13\ This pricing is reflected at chapter XV, section 2(1) and 
would be subject to aggregation by Affiliated Entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``Customer'' or (``C'') applies to any transaction 
that is identified by a Participant for clearing in the Customer 
range at The Options Clearing Corporation which is not for the 
account of broker or dealer or for the account of a ``Professional'' 
(as that term is defined in chapter I, section 1(a)(48)).
    \9\ A Non-Customer includes a Professional, Broker-Dealer and 
Non-BX Options Market Maker.
    \10\ The term ``Firm'' or (``F'') applies to any transaction 
that is identified by a Participant for clearing in the Firm range 
at The Options Clearing Corporation.
    \11\ The Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity in non-
Select Symbols ranges from $0.00 to $0.20 per contract.
    \12\ The Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Remove Liquidity in non-
Select Symbols ranges from $0.00 to $0.35 per contract.
    \13\ Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity in non-Select 
Symbols ranges from $0.30 to $0.39 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange offers Customers, when trading with Non-Customers, BX

[[Page 48866]]

Options Market Makers or Firms, the ability to obtain higher Penny 
Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity in Select Symbols \14\ with a 
tiered pricing model.\15\ The Exchange offers BX Options Market Makers, 
when trading with Customers, the ability to obtain a lower Penny Pilot 
Options Fees to Add Liquidity in Select Symbols with a tiered pricing 
model.\16\ The Exchange offers Customers, when trading with Non-
Customers, BX Options Market Makers, Customers or Firms, the ability to 
obtain higher Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Remove Liquidity in Select 
Symbols with a tiered pricing model.\17\ The Exchange offers BX Options 
Market Makers, when trading with Customers, the ability to obtain a 
lower Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity in Select Symbols 
with a tiered pricing model.\18\ Finally, the Exchange offers BX 
Options Market Makers, when trading with Non-Customers, BX Options 
Market Makers or Firms, the ability to obtain lower Fees to Add 
Liquidity in Select Symbols with a tiered pricing model.\19\ This 
pricing is reflected at chapter XV, section 2(1) and would be subject 
to aggregation by Affiliated Entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Select Symbols are: ASHR, DIA, DXJ, EEM, EFA, EWJ, EWT, 
EWW, EWY, EWZ, FAS, FAZ, FXE, FXI, FXP, GDX, GLD, HYG, IWM, IYR, 
KRE, OIH, QID, QLD, QQQ, RSX, SDS, SKF, SLV, SRS, SSO, TBT, TLT, 
TNA, TZA, UNG, URE, USO, UUP, UVXY, UYG, VXX, XHB, XLB, XLE, XLF, 
XLI, XLK, XLP, XLU, XLV, XLY, XME, XOP, XRT. See BX chapter XV, 
section 2(1) pricing.
    \15\ Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity in Select 
Symbols ranges from $0.00 to $0.25 per contract.
    \16\ Penny Pilot Options Fees to Add Liquidity in Select Symbols 
ranges from $0.29 to $0.44 per contract.
    \17\ Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Remove Liquidity in Select 
Symbols ranges from $0.00 to $0.37 per contract.
    \18\ Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity in Select 
Symbols ranges from $0.25 to $0.42 per contract.
    \19\ Penny Pilot Options Fees to Add Liquidity in Select Symbols 
ranges from $0.00 to $0.14 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the Exchange offers Customers, when trading with Non-
Customers, BX Options Market Makers or Firms, the ability to obtain 
higher Non-Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity with a tiered 
pricing model.\20\ Also, the Exchange offers BX Options Market Makers, 
when trading with Customers, the ability to obtain lower Non-Penny 
Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity with a tiered pricing model.\21\ 
This pricing is reflected at chapter XV, section 2(1) and would be 
subject to aggregation by Affiliated Entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ Non-Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity ranges 
from $0.00 to $0.20 per contract.
    \21\ Non-Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity ranges 
from $0.60 to $0.89 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The pricing noted herein demonstrates instances where the tiered 
pricing would provide a higher rebate or lower fee. In those cases 
where the pricing is the same for all tiers, the aggregation would not 
yield a higher rebate or lower fee.
    Currently, the Exchange also offers Customers, when trading with 
Non-Customers, BX Options Market Makers, Customers or Firms, the 
ability to obtain higher Rebates to Remove Liquidity in SPY Options in 
a tiered pricing model.\22\ This pricing is reflected at chapter XV, 
section 2(1) and would be subject to aggregation by Affiliated 
Entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The SPY rebate ranges from $0.10 to $0.51 per contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal would incentivize certain Participants, who 
are not by definition under Common Ownership, to enter into an 
Affiliated Entity relationship for the purpose of aggregating Customer 
volume to qualify for reduced Penny Pilot Options and non-Penny Pilot 
Options fees and higher Penny Pilot Options and non-Penny Pilot Options 
rebates. With respect to the pricing and the Affiliated Entity 
relationship, Appointed MMs would receive lower fees and Appointed OFPs 
would receive higher rebates, as applicable with this aggregated 
pricing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing 
Schedule is consistent with section 6(b) of the Act,\23\ in general, 
and furthers the objectives of section 6(b)(4) and (b)(5) of the 
Act,\24\ in particular, in that it provides for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and 
issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the 
Exchange operates or controls, and is not designed to permit unfair 
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4), (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their 
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining 
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation 
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market 
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in 
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current 
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in 
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most 
important to investors and listed companies.'' \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 29, 2005), 
70 FR 37496 at 37499 (File No. S7-10-04) (``Regulation NMS Adopting 
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission 
\26\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of 
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees 
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based 
approach.\27\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in 
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory 
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be 
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \27\ See id. at 534-535.
    \28\ See id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is 
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market 
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that 
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of 
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to 
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange 
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of 
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .'' \29\ Although the court and 
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange 
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options 
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Commission 
at Release No. 59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770 at 74782-74783 
(December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to amend chapter XV, section 2 to add the 
definitions of ``Appointed MM,'' ``Appointed OFP'' and ``Affiliated 
Entity'' is reasonable because the Exchange is proposing to identify 
the applicable market participants that may qualify to aggregate volume 
as an Affiliated Entity. Further the Exchange seeks to make clear the 
manner in which Participants may participate on the Exchange as 
Affiliated Entities by setting timeframes for communicating agreements 
among market participants and terms of early termination. The Exchange 
also clearly states that no Participant under Common Ownership may 
become a counterparty to an Affiliated Entity. Any Participant who 
meets the definition of Common Ownership shall not be eligible to 
become an Affiliated Entity. The Exchange believes that these terms are 
reasonable because they would allow

[[Page 48867]]

Participants to elect to become a counterparty to an Affiliated Entity, 
provided they are not under Common Ownership.
    The Exchange's proposal to amend chapter XV, section 2 to add the 
definitions of ``Appointed MM,'' ``Appointed OFP'' and ``Affiliated 
Entity'' is equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory because all 
Participants that are not under Common Ownership by definition may 
choose to enter into an Affiliated Entity relationship.
Chapter XV, Section 2(1)--Penny Pilot and Non-Penny Pilot Options 
Pricing
    The Exchange's proposal to permit Affiliated Entities to aggregate 
volume for purposes of qualifying Appointed OFPs for higher Penny Pilot 
and Non-Penny Pilot Options, including SPY, rebates \30\ and qualifying 
Appointed MMs for lower fees \31\ is reasonable because it will attract 
additional Customer and non-Customer order flow to the Exchange. 
Customer liquidity benefits all market participants by providing more 
trading opportunities, which attracts BX Options Market Makers. An 
increase in the activity of these market participants in turn 
facilitates tighter spreads, which may cause an additional 
corresponding increase in order flow from other market participants. 
Also, the Exchange is incentivizing Participants to send non-Customer 
order flow to BX, which order flow will benefit all Participants 
because they may interact with the liquidity. Market participants 
directing order flow as OFPs may be eligible to qualify for higher 
rebates with this proposal as a result of aggregating volume with an 
Appointed MM and thereby qualifying for higher rebates. Permitting 
Participants to affiliate for purposes of qualifying Appointed OFPs for 
higher rebates and qualifying Appointed MMs for lower fees may also 
encourage Affiliated Entities to incentivize each other to attract and 
seek to execute more volume on BX. In turn, market participants would 
benefit from the increased liquidity with which to interact and 
potentially tighter spreads on orders. Overall, incentivizing market 
participants with increased opportunities to earn higher rebates or 
lower fees may increase the quality of the liquidity available on BX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ The Exchange would permit Affiliated Entities to aggregate 
volume to obtain higher Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add Liquidity 
in non-Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Remove 
Liquidity in non-Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Add 
Liquidity in Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Rebates to Remove 
Liquidity in Select Symbols and Non-Penny Pilot Options Rebates to 
Add Liquidity.
    \31\ The Exchange would permit Affiliated Entities to aggregate 
volume to obtain lower Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity 
in non-Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Fees to Add Liquidity in 
Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity in 
Select Symbols, Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity in 
Select Symbols and Non-Penny Pilot Options Fees to Remove Liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to permit Affiliated Entities to aggregate 
volume for purposes of qualifying Appointed OFPs for higher Penny Pilot 
and Non-Penny Pilot Options, including SPY, rebates and qualifying 
Appointed MMs for lower fees is equitable and not unfairly 
discriminatory because all BX Participants, other than those that meet 
the definition of Common Ownership, may elect to become an Affiliated 
Entity as either an Appointed MM or an Appointed OFP.\32\ Also, each BX 
Participant may participate in only one Affiliated Entity relationship 
at a given time, which imposes a measure of exclusivity among market 
participants, allowing each party to rely on the other's executed 
volume on BX to receive a corresponding benefit in terms of a higher 
rebate or lower fee. Any market participant that by definition is not 
under Common Ownership may elect to become a counterparty of an 
Affiliated Entity. Also, BX Options Market Makers are valuable market 
participants that provide liquidity in the marketplace and incur costs 
that other market participants do not incur. BX Options Market Makers 
are subject to burdensome quoting obligations \33\ to the market that 
do not apply to other market participants. Incentivizing these market 
participants to execute volume on BX may result in tighter spreads.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Both Participants must elect each other to qualify as an 
Affiliated Entity for one year. Participation is effected by an 
agreement of both parties. One party may elect to terminate the 
agreement at any time.
    \33\ Pursuant to BX Rules at chapter VII, section 5, entitled 
``Obligations of Market Makers,'' in registering as a market maker, 
an Options Participant commits himself to various obligations. 
Transactions of a BX Options Market Maker must constitute a course 
of dealings reasonably calculated to contribute to the maintenance 
of a fair and orderly market, and BX Options Market Makers should 
not make bids or offers or enter into transactions that are 
inconsistent with such course of dealings. Further, all BX Options 
Market Makers are designated as specialists on BX for all purposes 
under the Act or rules thereunder. See chapter VII, section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to exclude Participants that are under 
Common Ownership from qualifying as an Affiliated Entity is reasonable 
because Participants under Common Ownership may aggregate volume today 
for purposes of chapter XV, section 2(1) pricing.\34\ The Exchange's 
proposal to exclude Participants that by definition are under Common 
Ownership from qualifying as an Affiliated Entity is equitable and not 
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply all 
qualifications in a uniform manner when approving Affiliated Entities. 
Excluding Participants under Common Ownership from also qualifying as 
an Affiliated Entity is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because they are able to aggregate volume today and qualify for higher 
rebates or lower fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See BX Rules at chapter XV for Common Ownership.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange does 
not believe that permitting Affiliated Entities to aggregate volume to 
qualify for certain rebates and reduced fees will impose any undue 
burden on competition, as discussed below.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which many 
sophisticated and knowledgeable market participants can readily and do 
send order flow to competing exchanges if they deem fee levels or 
rebate incentives at a particular exchange to be excessive or 
inadequate. Additionally, new competitors have entered the market and 
still others are reportedly entering the market shortly. These market 
forces ensure that the Exchange's fees and rebates remain competitive 
with the fee structures at other trading platforms.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of inter-market 
competition, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be 
excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more 
favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust 
its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges and with 
alternative trading systems that have been exempted from compliance 
with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges. Because 
competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because 
market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, 
the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this 
market may impose any

[[Page 48868]]

burden on competition is extremely limited.
    In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market 
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as 
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed 
changes will impair the ability of members or competing order execution 
venues to maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets. 
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that other 
options markets have similar incentives in place to attract volume to 
their markets.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ See NYSE MKT LLC's (``NYSE Amex'') pricing at NYSE Amex 
Options Fee Schedule). NYSE Amex permits aggregation of volume to 
qualify for the Amex Customer Engagement or ACE Program. See Bats 
BZX Exchange, Inc.'s (``BZX'') fee schedule. BZX permits aggregation 
of volume to qualify for tiered pricing. See the Chicago Board 
Options Exchange Incorporated (``CBOE'') Fees Schedule. CBOE permits 
aggregation of volume to qualify for credits available under an 
Affiliated Volume Plan or ``AVP.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to amend chapter XV, section 2 to add the 
definitions of ``Appointed MM,'' ``Appointed OFP'' and ``Affiliated 
Entity'' does not impose an undue burden on competition because these 
definitions apply to all Participants uniformly.
Chapter XV, Section 2(1)--Penny Pilot and Non-Penny Pilot Options 
Pricing
    In terms of intra-market competition, the Exchange does not believe 
that its proposal to permit counterparties of an Affiliated Entity to 
aggregate volume for purposes of qualifying Appointed OFPs for higher 
rebates, including SPY, and qualifying Appointed MMs for lower fees 
within chapter XV, section 2(1) imposes an undue burden on intra-market 
competition because all BX Participants, other than those under Common 
Ownership, may become an Affiliated Entity as either an Appointed MM or 
an Appointed OFP. Also, each BX Participant may participate in only one 
Affiliated Entity relationship at a given time, which imposes a measure 
of exclusivity among market participants, allowing each party to rely 
on the other's executed BX volume on BX to receive a corresponding 
benefit in terms of a higher rebate or lower fee. The Exchange will 
apply all qualifications in a uniform manner to all market participants 
that elect to become counterparties of an Affiliated Entity. Any market 
participant that by definition is a Participant under Common Ownership 
may not become a counterparty of an Affiliated Entity. Also, BX Options 
Market Makers are valuable market participants that provide liquidity 
in the marketplace and incur costs that other market participants do 
not incur. BX Options Market Makers are subject to burdensome quoting 
obligations \36\ to the market that do not apply to other market 
participants. Incentivizing these market participants to execute volume 
on BX may result in tighter spreads. An increase in the activity of 
these market participants in turn facilitates tighter spreads, which 
may cause an additional corresponding increase in order flow from other 
market participants. Appointed OFPs directing order flow to the 
Exchange may be eligible to qualify for a higher rebate and Appointed 
MMs may be eligible to qualify for lower fees, with this proposal, as a 
result of aggregating volume. Permitting Participants to affiliate for 
purposes of qualifying for chapter XV, section 2(1) higher rebates or 
lower fees may also encourage the counterparties that comprise the 
Affiliated Entities to incentivize each other to attract and seek to 
execute more volume on BX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ See note 33 above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to exclude Participants that are under 
Common Ownership from becoming an Affiliated Entity does not impose and 
[sic] undue burden on intra-market competition because Participants 
under Common Ownership may aggregate volume today for purposes of 
qualifying for higher rebates or lower fees.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-BX-2016-034 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2016-034. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit 
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2016-034 and 
should be submitted on or before August 16, 2016.


[[Page 48869]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-17586 Filed 7-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P