[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 136 (Friday, July 15, 2016)]
[Pages 46072-46075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16788]



[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0762; FRL-9947-90]

Registration Review; Conventional, Biopesticide and Antimicrobial 
Dockets Opened for Review and Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

[[Page 46073]]

ACTION: Notice.


SUMMARY: With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period 
for several registration review cases. Registration review is EPA's 
periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each 
pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, 
that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without 
unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. 
Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the 
public in understanding the types of information and issues that the 
Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through 
this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is 
based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects 
on human health and the environment. For dicamba, EPA is seeking 
comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem 
formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment. This document 
also announces the Agency's intent not to open a registration review 
docket for alachlor (case #: 0063) and propachlor (case #: 0177). These 
pesticides do not currently have any actively registered pesticide 
products and are not, therefore, scheduled for review under the 
registration review program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 13, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments identified by the docket identification 
(ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the 
table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business 
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted 
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.

Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

    For pesticide specific information contact: The person identified 
as a contact in the table in Unit III.A. Also include the docket ID 
number listed in the table in Unit III.A. for the pesticide of 
    For general information contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-8015; fax 
number: (703) 308-8090; email address: [email protected].


I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of 
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human 
health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; 
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, 
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be 
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific 
entities that may be affected by this action.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through 
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting 
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental 
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, 
including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the 
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population 
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other 
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human 
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides 
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Authority

    EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this 
document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) and the 
Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, 
subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the 
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under 
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only 
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA 
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with 
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must 
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on 
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the 
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the 
use of a pesticide in or on food.

III. Registration Reviews

A. What action is the agency taking?

    As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide 
registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they 
continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration--that is, they 
can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health 
or the environment. A pesticide's registration review begins when the 
Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide's registration review 
case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present, 
EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in 
the following table.

[[Page 46074]]

              Table 1--Registration Review Dockets Opening
  Registration review case
        name and No.              Docket ID No.            Contact
Acetochlor, 7230............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0298  Linsey Walsh,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 347-8030.
Bromethalin, 2765...........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0077  Christina Motilall,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 603-
Chlorflurenol Methyl Ester,   EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0037  Wilhelmena
 2095.                                               Livingston,
                                                     [email protected], (703)
Cholecalciferol, 7600.......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0139  James Parker,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 306-0469.
Corn Glutens, 6040..........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0253  Russell Jones,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 308-5071;
                                                    Judy Facey,
                                                     [email protected],
                                                     (703) 305-5450.
Dicamba, 0065...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0223  Marquea D. King,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 305-7432.
Dimethenamid and              EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0803  Maria Piansay,
 Dimethenamid-P, 7223.                               [email protected], (703) 308-8063;
                                                    Jordan Page,
                                                     [email protected]
                                                     . (703) 347-0467.
Florasulam, 7274............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0548  Moana Appleyard,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 308-
Glutaraldehyde, 2315........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0738  Stephen Savage,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 347-
Predator Urines: Coyote       EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0086  Menyon Adams,
 Urine and Fox Urine, 6202.                          [email protected], (703) 347-8496;
                                                    Judy Facey,
                                                     [email protected],
                                                     (703) 305-5450.
Reynoutria sachalinensis      EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0232  Chris Pfeifer,
 (Milsana), 6030.                                    [email protected], (703) 308-0031;
                                                    Judy Facey,
                                                     [email protected],
                                                     (703) 305-5450.
Siduron, 3130...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0857  Leigh Rimmer,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 347-0553.
Triforine, 2720.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0853  Susan Bartow,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 603-0065.
Verticillium isolate WCS850,  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0306  Michael Glikes,
 6508.                                               [email protected], (703) 305-
Zinc Phosphide, 0026........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0140  James Parker,
                                                     [email protected], (703) 306-0469.

    For dicamba (case #: 0065), EPA is seeking comment on the 
preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the 
human health draft risk assessment. EPA is also announcing that it will 
not be opening a docket for alachlor (case #: 0063) and propachlor 
(case #: 0177) because these pesticides are not included in any 
products actively registered under FIFRA section 3 or 24(c). The Agency 
will take separate action to propose revocation of any affected 
tolerances that are not supported for import purposes only.

B. Docket Content

    1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain 
information that the Agency may consider in the course of the 
registration review. The Agency may include information from its files 
including, but not limited to, the following information:
     An overview of the registration review case status.
     A list of current product registrations and registrants.
     Federal Register notices regarding any pending 
registration actions.
     Federal Register notices regarding current or pending 
     Risk assessments.
     Bibliographies concerning current registrations.
     Summaries of incident data.
     Any other pertinent data or information.
    Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency 
currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan 
for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide 
more detailed information. During this public comment period, the 
Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional 
information they believe the Agency should consider during the 
registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each 
docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though 
comment in any area is welcome.
    2. Other related information. More information on these cases, 
including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the 
registration review schedule on the Agency's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/registration-review-schedules. 
Information on the Agency's registration review program and its 
implementing regulation may be seen at http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/registration-review-process.
    3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or 
information in response to this document. To be considered during a 
pesticide's registration review, the submitted data or information must 
meet the following requirements:
     To ensure that EPA will consider data or information 
submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information 
during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider 
data or information submitted at a later date.
     The data or information submitted must be presented in a 
legible and useable form. For example, an English

[[Page 46075]]

translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a 
written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an 
audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted 
in paper or electronic form.
     Submitters must clearly identify the source of any 
submitted data or information.
     Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or 
information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, 
submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider 
the data or information in the pesticide's registration review.
    As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for 
each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the 
duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions 
required in the final decision on the registration review case have 
been completed.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 6, 2016.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide 
[FR Doc. 2016-16788 Filed 7-14-16; 8:45 am]