[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36261-36262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-900]


Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results 
of Review and Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2011-2012

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 11, 2016, the United States Court of International 
Trade (the Court) sustained our final remand redetermination pertaining 
to the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on diamond 
sawblades and parts thereof from the People's Republic of China 
covering the period November 1, 2011, through October 31, 2012 (third 
administrative review).\1\ Consistent with the decision of the United 
States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in Timken Co. v. 
United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken), as clarified by 
Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. 
Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades), the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) is notifying the public that the Court's final judgment in 
this case is not in harmony with the AR3 Final Results \2\ and that the 
Department is amending the AR3 Final Results with respect to the PRC-
wide entity, including the ATM Single Entity.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Gang Yan Diamond Products, Inc. v. United States, Court 
No. 14-00148, slip op. 16-49, 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 49 (Ct. 
Int'l Trade May 11, 2016); Final Remand Redetermination pursuant to 
Gang Yan Diamond Products, Inc. v. United States, Court No. 14-
00148, slip op. 15-127, (Ct. Int'l Trade Nov. 9, 2015), dated 
February 8, 2016, and available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/15-127.pdf (AR3 Remand Redetermination), aff'd, Gang Yan 
Diamond Products, Inc. 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 49.
    \2\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's 
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2011-2012, 79 FR 35723 (June 24, 2014) (AR3 Final Results).
    \3\ The ATM Single Entity includes Advanced Technology & 
Materials Co., Ltd., Beijing Gang Yan Diamond Products Co., HXF Saw 
Co., Ltd., AT&M International Trading Co., Ltd., and Cliff 
International Ltd. See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the 
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 77098, 77099 (December 20, 
2013), unchanged in AR3 Final Results.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 21, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office I, Enforcement

[[Page 36262]]

and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 
(202) 482-5760 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 24, 2014, the Department published the AR3 Final Results, 
in which we assigned the PRC-wide rate of 164.09 percent to companies 
including the ATM Single Entity that comprise the PRC-wide entity.\4\ 
The ATM Single Entity challenged our decision to treat it as part of 
the PRC-wide entity and assign the PRC-wide rate to it. On November 9, 
2015, the Court remanded the AR3 Final Results to the Department to 
reconsider the PRC-wide rate in light of the remand redeterminations 
for the two previous reviews that the Department issued after the 
publication of the AR3 Final Results.\5\ In these two remand 
redeterminations, the Department found that the ATM Single Entity was 
not entitled to a separate rate and, therefore, was part of the PRC-
wide entity, and revised the PRC-wide rate using the simple average of 
the margins that had been calculated for the ATM Single Entity in the 
underlying administrative reviews and the petition rate in the less-
than-fair-value investigation, i.e., 164.09 percent.\6\ On remand for 
the third administrative review, the Department revised the PRC-wide 
rate consistent with the immediately preceding administrative review, 
i.e., the second administrative review.\7\ On May 11, 2016, the Court 
upheld our AR3 Remand Redetermination in its entirety.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See AR3 Final Results, 79 FR at 35724, n.7.
    \5\ See Gang Yan Diamond Products, Inc. v. United States, Court 
No. 14-00148, slip op. 15-127 (Ct. Int'l Trade Nov. 9, 2015).
    \6\ See Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Diamond 
Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13-
00078, slip op. 14-50 (Ct. Int'l Trade Apr. 29, 2014), dated April 
10, 2015, and available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/14-50.pdf, aff'd, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 13-00078, slip op. 15-105 (Ct. Int'l Trade Sept. 
23, 2015), and Final Remand Redetermination pursuant to Diamond 
Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United States, Court No. 13-
00241, slip op. 14-112 (Ct. Int'l Trade Sept. 23, 2014), dated May 
18, 2015, and available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/remands/14-112.pdf, aff'd, Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition v. United 
States, Court No. 13-00241, slip op. 15-116 (Ct. Int'l Trade Oct. 
21, 2015).
    \7\ See AR3 Remand Redetermination. See also Diamond Sawblades 
and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Notice of 
Court Decision Not in Harmony With the Final Results of Review and 
Amended Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 
81 FR 2843 (January 19, 2016), for the revision of the PRC-wide rate 
for the second administrative review.
    \8\ See Gang Yan Diamond Products, Inc., 2016 Ct. Intl. Trade 
LEXIS 49.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, the 
CAFC held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended (the Act), the Department must publish a notice of a court 
decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and 
must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court 
decision. The Court's final judgment affirming the AR3 Remand 
Redetermination constitutes the Court's final decision which is not in 
harmony with the AR3 Final Results. This notice is published in 
fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, the 
Department will continue the suspension of liquidation of the subject 
merchandise pending a final and conclusive court decision.

Amended Final Results of Review

    Because there is now a final court decision, the Department is 
amending the AR3 Final Results with respect to the PRC-wide entity, 
which includes the ATM Single Entity, as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                              dumping
                                                            margin  (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-Wide Entity (which includes the ATM Single Entity)..           82.05
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, 
upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, the Department will 
instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping 
duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise based on the 
revised rate the Department determined and listed above.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The current cash deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity is 82.05 
percent, and thus same as the cash deposit rate established in the AR3 
Remand Redetermination.\9\ Therefore, there is no need to update the 
cash deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity as a result of these amended 
final results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From the People's 
Republic of China; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 32344, 32345 (June 8, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 31, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-13279 Filed 6-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P