[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32719-32720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service


Rural Energy Savings Program: Measurement, Verification, Training 
and Technical Assistance

AGENCY: Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of comment solicitation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Congress recently authorized the implementation of the Rural 
Energy Savings Program (RESP) in section 6407 of subtitle E of title VI 
of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-
171; 116 Stat. 424). The purpose of RESP is to help rural families and 
small businesses achieve cost savings by providing loans to qualified 
consumers to implement durable cost-effective energy efficiency 
measures. The Rural Utilities Service (RUS or Agency) seeks public 
comments on carrying out paragraph (e) of section 6407 requiring RUS to 
establish a plan for measurement and verification of energy efficiency 
measures implemented and funded pursuant to RESP. Public comments are 
also invited on the additional requirement under paragraph (e) 
requiring RUS to develop a program to provide technical assistance and 
training to the employees of eligible entities carrying out the 
provisions of RESP. The public input requested on both these required 
purposes under the RESP Program will allow all affected stakeholders 
the opportunity to contribute to the development of agency procedures 
for implementing this statute.

DATES: Written comments must be received by RUS no later than June 23, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number RUS-16-
ELECTRIC-0028, by any of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery/Hand Delivery: Thomas P. Dickson, 
Acting Director, Program Development and Regulatory Analysis, USDA 
Rural Development, 1400 Independence Avenue, STOP 1522, Room 5159, 
Washington, DC 20250-1522.
    RUS will post all comments received without change, including any 
personal information that is included with the comment, on http://www.regulations.gov. Comments will be available for inspection online 
at http://www.regulations.gov and at the address listed above between 
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Titilayo Ogunyale, Senior Advisor, 
Office of the Administrator, Rural Utilities Service, Rural 
Development, United States Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence 
Avenue SW., STOP 1510, Room 5136-S, Washington DC 20250-1510; 
Telephone: (202) 720-0736; Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    RUS provides long-term financing for the purpose of furnishing and 
improving electric service in rural areas. Eligible purposes for RUS 
loans also include assisting electric borrowers to implement demand-
side management, energy efficiency and energy conservation programs, 
and on-grid and off-grid renewable energy systems. The Agency's 
traditional lending program provides RUS loans to eligible electric 
system borrowers. RESP differs from the Agency's traditional lending 
program in that it focuses on providing loans to eligible entities that 
agree to provide consumer loans to qualified consumers for energy 
efficiency measures which are undertaken on the consumer side of the 
meter.
    Current RUS borrowers are traditionally well-established utilities, 
most frequently rural electric cooperatives with a history of 
participation in the RUS program. Entities eligible to borrow from RUS 
and relend to consumers pursuant to RESP are not restricted to electric 
utilities per se; entities owned or controlled by current or former RUS 
borrowers and those entities described in 7 CFR 1710.10 may also 
participate in the RESP program.
    For purposes of this Notice, the statute contemplates that the 
Secretary, acting through RUS, will (1) establish a plan for the 
measurement and verification of the energy efficiency activities that 
are undertaken pursuant to the plans implemented with RUS funds, and 
(2) develop a program to provide technical assistance and training to 
the employees of eligible entities to carry out the responsibilities 
associated with implementing the required implementation plans for the 
use of loan funds.
    RUS is currently determining the best method for carrying out the 
RESP imposed requirement for establishing such an implementation plan 
and for crafting the related statement of work for the potential 
outside contractor that will be engaged to provide support services in 
this endeavor. RUS is also considering how best to meet its 
responsibilities under the statute to develop a program to provide 
technical assistance and training to the employees of eligible 
entities.

Request for Comment

    Stakeholder input is vital to ensure that the implementation of the 
RESP program measurement and verification measures and related training 
will be valuable, cost effective and achieve the desired results. The 
Agency recognizes there is a risk that the cost of measurement and 
verification activities exceed the savings which are intended and 
expected from the energy efficiency measures. Also, the Agency notes 
that there are a number of quality training programs already in 
existence and available in the industry. Accordingly, RUS poses the 
following questions and discussion items to guide stakeholder comments. 
RUS also welcomes pertinent comments that are beyond the scope of the 
following questions.

[[Page 32720]]

Measurement of the Results of Energy Efficiency Investments

    There is no standard set of energy efficiency measures that RUS 
proposes to finance with RESP funds. Each entity that applies for a 
RESP loan will have its own list of energy efficiency measures and 
related implementation plan. The borrower is also required to measure 
and verify the results it achieves. The agency requests responses and 
comments as follows:
    1. Is it reasonable to require that the borrower collect data 
before and after implementation of the energy efficiency measures as 
part of the measurement and verification of cost savings, or, in the 
alternative, can a borrower rely on ``deemed savings'' for certain 
measures?
    2. If ``deemed savings'' calculations are determined to be 
reasonable, where can independent resources for this information be 
found?

Best Entity To Measure the Results of Energy Efficiency Investments

    1. Is it reasonable for the Agency to rely on representations made 
by the borrower regarding the results it achieves?
    2. What parameters should the Agency impose on self-measurement and 
verification activities included in a borrower's implementation plan?

Form of Training Program To Be Developed and Funded as Part of the RESP 
Program

    RUS has observed that there are a myriad of programs currently 
available in the market to train employees of eligible entities to 
carry out measurement and verification functions. RUS invites comments 
on the best approach for RUS to take to maximize the training results 
achieved with limited funds.
    1. RUS is considering establishing a ``tuition reimbursement'' 
program whereby an outside contractor administers a tuition 
reimbursement fund to reimburse eligible entities for the costs 
incurred from sending an employee to a course provided by a qualified 
vendor as part of a recognized certification program. Please comment on 
how best to structure such a ``tuition reimbursement program.''
    2. RUS is contemplating setting up a circuit rider program to 
provide training and technical assistance on location for energy 
efficiency measures. The intent is to follow the model of a comparable 
circuit rider program funded by RUS as part of the agency's authorized 
activities in the water program. In the circuit rider program, experts 
visit rural water systems around the country and offer training to 
employees as well as technical assistance. These visits can be 
requested by a client in response to special needs or are part of a 
regular schedule that is worked out in advance. Please comment on the 
pros and cons of taking this approach.

Needs Specific to Manufactured Housing

    Many traditional RUS electric utility borrowers have an above 
average number of customers residing in mobile homes or prefabricated 
dwellings. These dwellings present unique challenges in implementing 
energy efficiency measures. The agency requests responses and comments 
on the following questions:
    1. What program requirements are recommended for new manufactured 
housing? Is it reasonable for a Borrower to undertake a rebate program 
for new buyers agreeing to purchase new homes with certain upgrades? 
How will a borrower best verify that the upgrades are installed and 
producing the results as marketed?
    2. With respect to pre-existing mobile homes, what measurements can 
be taken to produce the most cost effective energy savings for the 
consumer?
    3. A disproportionate number of the occupants of manufactured 
housing are renters. The owners may not necessarily have a financial 
incentive to invest in more efficient heating and cooling systems, 
causing the occupant to suffer very high energy bills. Are there 
programs which have successfully addressed this problem and what are 
the attributes of these programs?
    4. Is there a way to best incorporate consumer financing of energy 
efficiency measures with pre-paid billing programs?

The Scope of RUS Efforts

    There are limited funds for implementing the provision of RESP that 
contemplates RUS entering into one or more contracts for measurement, 
verification, training or technical assistance. As an initial matter, 
these funds are not expected to exceed ten percent of available 
appropriations. As part of the Agency's initial implementation of this 
portion of the statute, we anticipate that the scope of work cannot 
extend to all entities and all geographic areas needing these services. 
Accordingly, comments are invited on how to tailor the scope of the 
Agency's initial pilot implementation of this requirement in light of 
the limited funding.

    Dated: May 17, 2016.
Brandon McBride,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-12192 Filed 5-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P