[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27159-27164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10481]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
[Docket ID FEMA-2016-0008]
Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program; Fire Prevention and
Safety Grants
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS
ACTION: Notice of guidance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice provides guidelines that describe the application
process for grants and the criteria for awarding Fire Prevention and
Safety (FP&S) grants in the fiscal year (FY) 2015 Assistance to
Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program year. It explains the differences, if
any, between these guidelines and those recommended by representatives
of the Nation's fire service leadership during the annual Criteria
Development meeting, which was held October 27-28, 2014. The
application period for the FY 2015 FP&S Grant Program year will be held
April 4-May 6, 2016, and will be announced on the AFG Web site
(www.fema.gov/firegrants), www.grants.gov, and U.S. Fire Administration
Web site (www.usfa.fema.gov).
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2229.
DATES: Grant applications for the FP&S Grant Program will be accepted
electronically at https://portal.fema.gov, from April 4-May 6, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Assistance to Firefighters Grants Branch, Stop 3620, DHS/
FEMA, 400 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Patterson, Chief, Assistance
to Firefighters Grants Branch, 1-866-274-0960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the AFG Program is to enhance
the safety of the public and firefighters with respect to fire and
fire-related hazards. The FEMA Grant Programs Directorate administers
the FP&S Grant Program as part of the AFG Program.
FP&S Grants are offered to support projects in two activities:
[[Page 27160]]
1. Activities designed to reach high-risk target groups and
mitigate the incidence of death and injuries caused by fire and fire-
related hazards (``FP&S Activity'').
2. Projects aimed at improving firefighter safety, health and
wellness through research and development that reduces firefighter
fatalities and injuries (``R&D Activity'').
The grant program's authorizing statute requires that each year DHS
publish in the Federal Register the guidelines that describe the
application process and the criteria for grant awards. Approximately
1,000 applications for FP&S Grant Program funding are anticipated to be
submitted electronically, using the application submission form and
process available at the AFG e-Grant application portal: https://portal.fema.gov. Specific information about the submission of grant
applications can be found in the ``FY 2015 Fire Prevention and Safety
Program Notice of Funding Opportunity,'' which will be available for
download at www.fema.gov/firegrants and at www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID FEMA-2016-0008.
Appropriations
Congress appropriated $340,000,000 for AFG in FY 2015 pursuant to
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015, Public
Law 114-4. From this amount, $34,000,000 will be made available for
FP&S Grant awards, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2229(h)(5), which states that
not less than 10 percent of available grant funds each year are awarded
under the FP&S Grant Program. Funds appropriated for all FY 2015 AFG
awards, pursuant to Public Law 114-4, will be available for obligation
and award until September 30, 2016.
From the approximately 1,000 applications that will be requesting
assistance, FEMA anticipates that it will award approximately 100 FP&S
Grants from available grant funding.
Background of the AFG Program
DHS awards grants on a competitive basis to the applicants that
best address the FP&S Grant Program's priorities and provide the most
compelling justification. Applications that best address the Program's
priorities will be reviewed by a panel composed of fire service
personnel.
Award Criteria
All applications for grants will be prepared and submitted through
the AFG e-Grant application portal (https://portal.fema.gov).
The FP&S Grant Program panels will review the applications and
score them using the following criteria areas:
Vulnerability
Implementation
Evaluation Plan
Cost Benefit
Financial Need
Funding Priorities
Experience and Expertise
The applications submitted under the R&D Activity will be reviewed
first by a panel of fire service members to identify those applications
most relevant to the fire service. The following evaluation criteria
will be used for this review:
Purpose
Potential Impact
Implementation by the fire service
Partners
Barriers
The applications that are determined most likely to be implemented
to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or wellness will
be deemed to be in the ``competitive range'' and will be forwarded to
the second level of application review, which is the scientific panel
review process. This panel will be comprised of scientists and
technology experts who have expertise pertaining to the subject matter
of the proposal.
The Scientific Technical Evaluation Panel for the R&D Activity will
review the application and evaluate it using the following criteria:
Project purpose(s), goals and objectives, and specific
aims
Literature Review
Project Methods
Project Measurements
Project Analysis
Dissemination and Implementation
Cost vs. Benefit (additional consideration)
Financial Need (additional consideration)
Eligible Applicants
The following entities are eligible to apply directly to FEMA under
this solicitation:
1. Fire Prevention and Safety (FP &S) Activity: Eligible applicants
for this activity include fire departments, national, regional, state,
local, tribal, and nonprofit organizations that are recognized for
their experience and expertise in fire prevention and safety programs
and activities. Both private and public non-profit organizations are
eligible to apply for funding in this activity. For-profit
organizations, federal agencies, and individuals are not eligible to
receive a FP &S Grant Award under the FP &S Activity.
2. Firefighter Safety Research and Development (R&D) Activity:
Eligible applicants for this activity include national, state, local,
tribal, and nonprofit organizations, such as academic (e.g.,
universities), public health, occupational health, and injury
prevention institutions. Both private and public non-profit
organizations are eligible to apply for funding in this activity.
The aforementioned entities are encouraged to apply, especially
those that are recognized for their experience and expertise in
firefighter safety, health, and wellness research and development
activities. Fire departments are not eligible to apply for funding in
the R &D activity. Additionally, for-profit organizations, federal
agencies, and individuals are not eligible to receive a grant award
under the R &D Activity.
Statutory Limits to Funding
Applications and awards are limited to a maximum federal share of
$1.5 million dollars, regardless of applicant type.
Cost Sharing
Grant recipients must share in the costs of the projects funded
under this grant program as required by 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(1) and in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.101(b)(1), but they are not required to have
the cost-share at the time of application nor at the time of award.
However, before a grant is awarded, FEMA will contact potential
awardees to determine whether the grant recipient has the funding in
hand or if the grant recipient has a viable plan to obtain the funding
necessary to fulfill the cost-sharing requirement.
In general, an eligible applicant seeking an FP&S grant to carry
out an activity shall agree to make available non-federal funds to
carry out such activity in an amount equal to, and not less than, five
percent of the grant awarded. Cash match and in-kind matches are both
allowable in the FP &S Grant Program. Cash (hard) matches include non-
federal cash spent for project-related costs. In-kind (soft) matches
include, but are not limited to, the valuation of in-kind services. In-
kind is the value of something received or provided that does not have
a cost associated with it. For example, where an in-kind match (other
than cash payments) is permitted, then the value of donated services
could be used to comply with the match requirement. Also, third party
in-kind contributions may count toward satisfying match requirements
provided the grant recipient receiving the contributions expends them
as allowable costs in
[[Page 27161]]
compliance with provisions listed above.
Grant recipients under this grant program must also agree to a
maintenance of effort requirement as required by 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(3)
(referred to as a ``maintenance of expenditure'' requirement in that
statute). Per this requirement, a grant recipient shall agree to
maintain during the term of the grant, the grant recipient's aggregate
expenditures relating to the activities allowable under the FP&S
Funding Opportunity Announcement at not less than 80 percent (80%) of
the average amount of such expenditures in the two (2) fiscal years
preceding the fiscal year in which the grant amounts are received.
In cases of demonstrated economic hardship, and on the application
of the grant recipient, the Administrator of FEMA may waive or reduce
certain grant recipient's cost share or maintenance of expenditure
requirements. This policy applies to FP &S per Sec. 33 of the Federal
Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-498, as amended)
(15 U.S.C 2229). For complete requirements concerning these waivers,
including a description of how a grant recipient may demonstrate
economic hardship and apply for a waiver, please refer to FEMA Policy
FP 207-088-01, dated April 8, 2014, at: http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1398109239435-ec23997d8351382710896fa77d02bc7d/AFG+Economic+Hardship+Waiver+Policy.pdf. Per 15 U.S.C. 2229(k)(4)(C),
FP&S grant recipientsthat are not fire departments are not eligible to
receive a waiver of their cost share or economic hardship requirements.
System for Award Management (SAM)
On July 29, 2010, the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) was
moved into the System for Award Management (SAM). The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidance to federal agencies
requiring all prime recipients of federal grants to register in SAM.
SAM is the primary vendor database for the Federal Government to
collect, validate, store, and disseminate data from a secure
centralized system. SAM consolidated the capabilities found in CCR and
other federal procurement systems into one new system.
There is no charge to register in SAM.gov. Registrations must be
completed on-line at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. The
applicant organization is responsibile for having a valid Dun and
Bradstreet (DUNS) number at the time of registration. Organizations
with an active record in CCR have an active record in SAM, but may need
to validate their information. For registration, go to https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.
Application Process
Applicants may only submit one (1) application, but may submit for
up to three (3) projects under each activity (FP&S and R&D). Any
applicant that submits more than one (1) application may have all
applications for any duplicated request(s) deemed ineligible.
Under the FP &S Activity, applicants may apply under the following
categories:
General Education/Awareness
Fire & Arson Investigation
Code Enforcement/Awareness
National/State/Regional Programs and Studies
Under the R&D Activity, applicants may apply under the following
categories:
Clinical Studies
Technology and Product Development
Database System Development
Dissemination and Implementation Research
Preliminary Studies
Prior to the start of the FY 2015 FP&S Grant Program application
period, FEMA will provide applicants with technical assistance tools
(available at the AFG Web site: www.fema.gov/firegrants) and other
online information to help them prepare quality grant applications. AFG
will also staff a Help Desk throughout the application period to assist
applicants with navigation through the automated application as well as
assistance with any questions they have. Applicants can reach the AFG
Help Desk through a toll-free telephone number (1-866-274-0960) or
electronic mail ([email protected]).
Applicants are advised to access the application electronically at
https://portal.fema.gov. The application also will be accessible from
the grants.gov Web site (http://www.grants.gov). New applicants are
required to register and establish a username and password for secure
access to their application. Applicants that applied to any previous
AFG or Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER)
funding opportunities were required to use their previously established
usernames and passwords.
In completing an application under this funding opportunity,
applicants will be asked to provide relevant information on their
organization's characteristics and existing capabilities. Those
applicants are asked to answer questions about their grant request that
reflect the funding priorities, described below. In addition, each
applicant will complete narratives for each project or grant activity
requested.
The following are the funding priorities for each category under
the FP&S Activity:
General Education/Awareness--Under the General Education/
Awareness category there are two funding priorities:
[cir] The first priority will be given to programs that target high
risk population to conduct both door-to-door smoke alarm installations
and provide home safety inspections (including sprinkler awareness), as
part of a comprehensive home fire safety campaign.
[cir] The second priority will be given to programs that include
sprinkler awareness that affect the entire community, such as educating
the public about residential sprinklers, promoting residential
sprinklers, and demonstrating working models of residential sprinklers.
Code Enforcement/Awareness--projects that focus on first
time or reinstatement of code adoption and code enforcement.
Fire & Arson Investigation--projects that aim to
aggressively investigate every fire.
National/State/Regional Programs and Studies--projects
that focus on residential fire issues and/or firefighter behavior and
decision-making.
Under the R&D Activity, in order to identify and address the most
important elements of firefighter safety, FEMA looked to the fire
service for its input and recommendations. In June 2005, the National
Fallen Firefighters' Foundation (NFFF) hosted a working group to
facilitate the development of an agenda for the nation's fire service,
and in particular for firefighter safety. In November 2015, the NFFF
hosted their third working group to update the agenda with current
priorities. A copy of the research agenda is available on the NFFF Web
site at http://www.everyonegoeshome.com/resources/research-symposium-reports/.
Projects that meet the intent of this research agenda with respect
to firefighter health and safety, as identified by the NFFF working
group, will be given consideration under the R&D Activity. However, the
applicant is not limited to these specific projects. All proposed
projects, regardless of whether they have been identified by this
working group, will be evaluated on their relevance to firefighter
health and safety, and scientific rigor.
The electronic application process will permit the applicant to
enter and
[[Page 27162]]
save the application data. The system does not permit the submission of
incomplete applications. Except for the narrative textboxes, the
application will use a ``point-and-click'' selection process or require
the entry of data (e.g., name and address). Applicants will be
encouraged to read the FP&S Funding Opportunity Announcement for more
details.
Criteria Development Process
Each year, DHS convenes a panel of fire service professionals to
develop the funding priorities and other implementation criteria for
AFG. The Criteria Development Panel is comprised of representatives
from nine major fire service organizations who are charged with making
recommendations to FEMA regarding the creation of new funding
priorities, the modification of existing funding priorities, and the
development of criteria for awarding grants. The nine major fire
service organizations represented on the panel are:
Congressional Fire Services Institute (CFSI)
International Association of Arson Investigators (IAAI)
International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC)
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF)
International Society of Fire Service Instructors (ISFSI)
National Association of State Fire Marshals (NASFM)
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)
National Volunteer Fire Council (NVFC)
North American Fire Training Directors (NAFTD)
The FY 2015 criteria development panel meeting occurred January 8-
9, 2014. The content of the FY 2015 FP&S Funding Opportunity
Announcement reflects the implementation of the Criteria Development
Panel's recommendations with respect to the priorities, direction, and
criteria for awards. All of the funding priorities for the FY 2015 FP&S
Grant Program are designed to address the following:
First responder safety
Enhancing national capabilities
Risk
Interoperability
Changes for FY 2015
FY 2015 FP&S Notice of Funding Opportunity Announcement.
(1) The ``Guidance and Application Kit'' has been reformatted from
the Funding Opportunity (FOA) Announcement template to match the DHS
Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) Announcement template.
(2) Sustainability is no longer a scored evaluation criteria under
the Fire Prevention and Safety Activity, thus the evaluation criteria
weights have changed for the other criteria components.
(3) The Narrative Statement for the R&D Activity increased in page
limitation from 20 pages to 25 pages per project.
(4) Micro Grants are now eligible for the Fire Prevention and
Safety Activity. The cumulative Federal total of the request must be
$25,000 or less.
Application Review Process and Considerations
The program's authorizing statute requires that each year DHS
publish in the Federal Register a description of the grant application
process and the criteria for grant awards. This information is provided
below.
DHS will review and evaluate all FP&S applications submitted using
the funding priorities and evaluation criteria described in this
document, which are based on recommendations from the AFG Criteria
Development Panel.
Peer Review Process
Technical Evaluation Process--Fire Prevention and Safety Activity
All eligible applications will be evaluated by a Technical
Evaluation Panel (TEP). The TEP is comprised of a panel of Peer
Reviewers. The TEP will assess each application's merits with respect
to the detail provided in the Narrative Statement on the activity,
including the evaluation elements listed in the Evaluation Criteria
identified above.
The panel of Peer Reviewers will independently score each project
within the application, discuss the merits and/or shortcomings of the
application, and document the findings. A consensus is not required.
The highest ranked applications will receive further technical review
to assess strengths and weaknesses, how readily weaknesses may be
resolved, and the likely impact of the proposed activities on the
safety of the target audience.
Technical Evaluation Process--Research and Development Activity
R&D applications will go through a two-phase review process. First,
all applications will be reviewed by a panel of fire service experts to
assess relevance, meaning the likely impact of the proposed R&D
application to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or
wellness. They will also assess the need for the research results and
the likelihood that the results would be implemented by the fire
service in the U.S. Applications that are deemed likely to be
implemented to enable improvement in firefighter safety, health, or
wellness will then receive further consideration by a science review
panel. This panel will be comprised of scientists and technology
experts who have expertise pertaining to the subject matter of the
proposal.
Reviewers will independently score applications and, if necessary,
discuss the merits or shortcomings of the application in order to
reconcile any major discrepancies identified by the reviewers. A
consensus is not required.
With input from these panels, for the highest ranked applications,
FEMA will review each application's strengths and weaknesses, how best
the strengths fit the priorities of the FP&S Program, and how readily
the weaknesses may be resolved to support likely impact of the project
to improve firefighter safety, heath, or wellness.
Technical Review Process
Projects receiving the highest scores then will undergo a technical
review by a subject matter specialist to assess the technical
feasibility of the project and a programmatic review to assess
eligibility and other factors.
After the completion of the technical reviews, DHS will select a
sufficient number of awardees from this application period to obligate
all of the available grant funding. It will evaluate and act on
applications within 90 days following the close of the application
period. Award announcements will be made on a rolling basis until all
available grant funds have been committed. Awards will not be made in
any specified order. DHS will notify unsuccessful applicants as soon as
it is feasible.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects--Fire Prevention and Safety Activity
Funding decisions will be informed by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and considerations listed below.
Applications will be reviewed by the TEP using weighted evaluation
criteria to score the project. These scores will impact the ranking of
a project for funding.
The relative weight of the evaluation criteria in the determination
of the grant award is listed below.
Financial Need (10%): Applicants should provide details on
the need for financial assistance to carry out the proposed project(s).
Included in the
[[Page 27163]]
description might be other unsuccessful attempts to acquire financial
assistance or specific examples of the applicant's operational budget.
Vulnerability Statement (25%): The assessment of fire risk
is essential in the development of an effective project goal, as well
as meeting FEMA's goal to reduce risk by conducting a risk analysis as
a basis for action. Vulnerability is a ``weak link'' demonstrating high
risk behavior, living conditions or any type of high risk situation or
behavior. The Vulnerability Statement should include a description of
the steps taken to determine the vulnerability (weak link) and identify
the target audience. The methodology for determination of vulnerability
(how you found the weak link) should be discussed in-depth in the
application's Narrative Statement.
[cir] The specific vulnerability (weak link) that will be addressed
with the proposed project can be established through a formal or
informal risk assessment. FEMA encourages the use of local statistics,
rather than national statistics, when discussing the vulnerability.
[cir] The applicant should summarize the vulnerability (weakness)
the project will address in a clear, to-the-point statement that
addresses who is at risk, what the risks are, where the risks are, and
how the risks can be prevented.
[cir] For the purpose of the FY 2015 FP&S NOFO, formal risk
assessments consist of the use of software programs or recognized
expert analysis that assess risk trends.
[cir] Informal risk assessments could include an in-house review of
available data (e.g., National Fire Incident Reporting System) to
determine fire loss, burn injuries or loss of life over a period of
time, and the factors that are the cause and origin for each
occurrence.
Implementation Plan (25%): Projects should provide details
on the implementation plan which discusses the proposed project's goals
and objectives. The following information should be included to support
the implementation plan:
[cir] Goals and objectives.
[cir] Details regarding the methods and specific steps that will be
used to achieve the goals and objectives.
[cir] Timelines.
[cir] Where applicable, examples of marketing efforts to promote
the project, who will deliver the project (e.g., effective
partnerships), and the manner in which materials or deliverables will
be distributed.
[cir] Requests for props (i.e., tools used in educational or
awareness demonstrations), including specific goals, measurable
results, and details on the frequency for which the prop will be
utilized as part of the implementation plan. Applicants should include
information describing the efforts that will be used to reach the high
risk audience and/or the number of people reached through the proposed
project.
Evaluation Plan (25%): Projects should include an
evaluation of effectiveness and should identify measurable goals.
Applicants seeking to carry out awareness and educational projects, for
example, should identify how they intend to determine that there has
been an increase in knowledge about fire hazards, or measure a change
in the safety behaviors of the audience. Applicants should demonstrate
how they will measure risk at the outset of the project in comparison
to how much the risk decreased after the project is finished. There are
various ways to measure the knowledge gained including the use of
surveys, pre- and post-tests or documented observations.
Cost-Benefit (10%): Projects will be evaluated based on
how well the applicant addresses the fire prevention needs of the
department or organization in an economic and efficient manner. It
should show how to maximize the level of funding that goes directly
into the delivery of the project. The costs associated with the project
must also be reasonable for the target audience that will be reached,
and a description of how the anticipated benefit(s) of their projects
outweighs the cost(s) of the requested item(s) should be included.
Providing justification for costs assists the Technical Evaluation
Panel with this review.
Funding Priorities (5%): Applicants will be evaluated on
whether or not the proposed project meets the stated funding priority
(listed below) for the applicable category.
[cir] General Education/Awareness Priority: Comprehensive home fire
safety campaign with door-to-door smoke alarm installations or
residential sprinkler awareness projects/activities.
[cir] Fire/Arson Investigation Priority: Projects that aim to
aggressively investigate every fire.
[cir] Code Enforcement/Awareness Priority: Projects that focus on
first time or reinstatement of code adoption and code enforcement.
[cir] National/State/Regional Programs and Studies Priority:
Projects that focus on residential fire issues, and/or firefighter
safety projects or strategies that are designed to measureably change
firefighter behavior and decision-making.
Experience and Expertise (additional consideration):
Applicants that demonstrate their experience and ability to conduct
fire prevention and safety activities, and to execute the proposed or
similar project(s), will receive additional consideration.
Evaluation Criteria for Projects--Firefighter Safety Research and
Development Activity
Funding decisions will be informed by an assessment of how well the
application addresses the criteria and considerations listed below.
All applications will reviewed by a fire service expert panel using
weighted evaluation criteria, and those applications deemed to be in
the ``competitive range'' will then be reviewed by a scientific peer
review panel evaluation using weighted evaluation criteria to score the
project. Scientific evaluations will impact the ranking of the project
for funding.
In addition, other Science Panel considerations are indicated in
the list below:
Fire Service Evaluation Criteria
Purpose (25%): Applicants should clearly identify the
benefits of the proposed research project to improve firefighter
safety, health, or wellness, and identify specific gaps in knowledge
that will be addressed.
Implementation by Fire Service (25%): Applicants should
discuss how the outcomes/products of this research, if successful, are
likely to be widely/nationally adopted and accepted by the fire service
as changes that enhance firefighter safety, health, or wellness.
Potential Impact (15%): Applicants should discuss the
potential impact of the research outcome/product on firefighter safety
by quantifying the possible reduction in the number of fatal or non-
fatal injuries, or on wellness by significantly improving the overall
health of firefighters.
Barriers (15%): Applicants should recognize that all
research contains some level of risk and that the proposed outcomes may
not be realized. The applicant needs to identify and discuss potential
fire service and other barriers to successfully complete the study on
schedule, including contingencies and strategies to deal with barriers
if they materialize. This may include barriers that could inhibit the
proposed fire service participation in the study or the adoption of
successful results by the fire service when the project is completed.
Partners (20%): Applicants should recognize that
participation of the fire service as a partner in the research, from
development to dissemination, is
[[Page 27164]]
regarded as an essential part of all projects. Applicants should
describe the fire service partners and contractors that will support
the project to accomplish the objectives of the study. The specific
roles and contributions of the partners should be described.
Partnerships may be formed with local and regional fire departments,
and also with national fire-related organizations. Letters of support
and letters of commitment to actively participate in the project should
be included in the appendix of the application. Generally, participants
of a diverse population, including both career and volunteer
firefighters, are expected to facilitate acceptance of results
nationally. In cases where this is not practical, due to the nature of
the study or other limitations, these circumstances should clearly be
explained.
Science Panel Evaluation Criteria
Project goals, objectives, and specific aims (15%):
Applicants should address how the purpose, goals, objectives, and aims
of the proposal will lead to results that will improve firefighter
safety, health, or wellness. For multi-year projects, greater detail
should be given for the first year.
Literature Review (10%): Applicants should provide a
literature review that is relevant to the project's goals, objectives,
and specific aims. The citations should be placed in the text of the
narrative statement, with references listed at the end of the Narrative
Statement (and not in the Appendix) of the application. The review
should be in sufficient depth to make it clear that the proposed
project is necessary, adds to an existing body of knowledge, is
different from current and previous studies, and offers a unique
contribution.
Project Methods (20%): Applicants should provide a
description of how the project will be carried out, including
demonstration of the overall scientific and technical rigor and merit
of the project. This includes the operations to accomplish the purpose,
goals and objectives, and the specific aims of the project. Plans to
recruit and retain human subjects, where applicable, should be
described. Where human subjects are involved in the project, the
applicant should describe plans for submission to the Institutional
Review Board (IRB) (for further guidance and requirements, see Appendix
B--Programmatic Information and Priorities, Section IV. Other Eligible
Project and Ineligible Projects and Costs, Section B. Research and
Development Project Eligibility Information, Section i. Human Subject
Research).
Project Measurements (20%): Applicants should provide
evidence of the technical rigor and merit of the project, such as data
pertaining to validity, reliability, and sensitivity (where
established) of the facilities, equipment, instruments, standards, and
procedures that will be used to carry out the research. The applicant
should discuss the data to be collected to evaluate the performance
methods, technologies, and products proposed to enhance firefighter
safety, health, or wellness. The applicant should demonstrate that the
measurement methods and equipment selected for use are appropriate and
sufficient to successfully deliver the proposed project objectives.
Project Analysis (20%): The applicant should indicate the
planned approach for analysis of the data obtained from measurements,
questionnaires, or computations. The applicant should specify within
the plan what will be analyzed, the statistical methods that will be
used, the sequence of steps, and interactions as appropriate. It should
be clear that the Principal Investigator (PI) and research team have
the expertise to perform the planned analysis and defend the results in
a peer review process.
Dissemination and Implementation (15%): Applicants should
indicate dissemination plans for scientific audiences (such as plans
for submissions to specific peer review publications) and for
firefighter audiences (such as Web sites, magazines, and conferences).
Also, assuming positive results, the applicant should indicate future
steps that would support dissemination and implementation throughout
the fire service, where applicable. These steps are likely to be beyond
the current study, so those features of the research activity that will
facilitate future dissemination and implementation should be discussed.
All applicants should specify how the results of the project, if
successful, might be disseminated and implemented in the fire service
to improve firefighter safety, health, or wellness. It is expected that
successful R&D Activity Projects may give rise to future programs
including FP&S Activity Projects.
Cost vs. Benefit (additional consideration): Cost vs.
benefit in this evaluation element refers to the costs of the grant for
the research and development project as it relates to the benefits that
are projected for firefighters who would have improved safety, health,
or wellness. Applicants should demonstrate a high benefit for the cost
incurred, and effective utilization of federal funds for research
activities.
Financial Need (additional consideration): In the
Applicant Information section of the application, applicants should
provide details on the need for federal financial assistance to carry
out the proposed project(s). Applicants may include a description of
unsuccessful attempts to acquire financial assistance. Applicants
should provide detail about the organization's operating budget,
including a high-level breakdown of the budget; describe the
department's inability to address financial needs without federal
assistance; and discuss other actions the department has taken to meet
their staffing needs (e.g., state assistance programs, other grant
programs, etc.).
Other Selection Information
Awards will be made using the results of peer-reviewed applications
as the primary basis for decisions, regardless of activity. However,
there are some exceptions to strictly using the peer review results.
The applicant's prior AFG, SAFER, and FP&S grant management performance
will also be taken into consideration when making recommendations for
award. All final funding determinations will be made by the
Administrator of FEMA, or the Administrator's delegate.
Fire departments and other eligible applicants that have received
funding under the FP&S program in previous years are eligible to apply
for funding in the current year. However, DHS may take into account an
applicant's performance on prior grants when making funding decisions
on current applications.
Once every application in the competitive range has been through
the technical evaluation phase, the applications will be ranked
according to the average score awarded by the panel.
The ranking will be summarized in a Technical Report prepared by
the AFG Program Office. A Grants Management Specialist will contact the
applicant to discuss and/or negotiate the content of the application
and SAM.gov registration before making final award decisions.
Dated: April 5, 2016.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-10481 Filed 5-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P