[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15444-15449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-06450]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 216
[Docket No.: 160204080-6080-01]
RIN 0648-BF73
Enhanced Document Requirements and Captain Training Requirements
To Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label on Tuna Products
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues this interim final rule to revise regulations
implementing the Dolphin Protection Consumer Information Act (DPCIA) to
enhance the requirements for documentation that demonstrates the
accuracy of dolphin-safe labels on tuna products. This interim final
rule: Modifies the regulations (referred to hereafter as the
``determination provisions'') under which the NMFS Assistant
Administrator (Assistant Administrator) may require proof of an
observer certification if the Assistant Administrator determines that a
fishery has a regular and significant association between dolphins and
tuna and/or has a regular and significant mortality or serious injury
of dolphins, to apply equally to purse seine and other gear-type tuna
fisheries; provides that a government certificate validating the catch
documentation, segregation, and chain of custody may be required for
tuna produced from a fishery about which the Assistant Administrator
has made a determination under the determination provisions;
restructures NOAA regulations such that they now provide for one
straightforward certification regarding intentional deployment and
mortality/serious injury for all fisheries that produce tuna that is
potentially eligible for the dolphin-safe label; modifies the Fisheries
Certificate of Origin (FCO) to require captains to complete a training
for certifications that must accompany the FCO; enhances chain of
custody tracking requirements for tuna and tuna
[[Page 15445]]
product; and makes several non-substantive modifications to the
regulations. This interim final rule brings the United States into
compliance with its obligations as a Member of the World Trade
Organization (WTO).
DATES: This interim final rule is effective March 22, 2016, except for
amendatory instruction 2, which is effective May 21, 2016. Comments
must be submitted in writing by April 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2016-0012, by either of the following methods:
Electronic submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal.
1. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0012,
2. Click the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields,
and
3. Enter or attach your comments.
-- OR --
Mail: Submit written comments to William W. Stelle, Jr.,
NMFS West Coast Region (WCR), 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Bldg 1, Seattle,
WA 98115-0070.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
might not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of
the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name and address), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Jacobson, NMFS WCR, 562-980-
4035.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The DPCIA (16 U.S.C. 1385), enacted in 1990, established a dolphin-
safe labeling standard for tuna products. The law addressed a
Congressional finding that ``consumers would like to know if the tuna
they purchase is falsely labeled as to the effect of the harvesting of
the tuna on dolphins.'' Specifically, the DPCIA makes it a violation of
U.S. law regarding deceptive practices to use any label with the term
dolphin-safe or any other term or symbol that falsely claims or
suggests that the tuna contained in the product were harvested using a
method of fishing that is not harmful to dolphins, except under the
conditions laid out in the DPCIA and associated regulations. The
authority of the Secretary of Commerce under the DPCIA has been
delegated to the Assistant Administrator.
In 2008, Mexico initiated WTO dispute settlement proceedings to
challenge the U.S. dolphin-safe labeling scheme as being inconsistent
with certain provisions of the WTO's General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) and Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade
(TBT Agreement). Mexico challenged three components of the U.S.
measure: The DPCIA, Department of Commerce DPCIA regulations (50 CFR
216.91 and 216.92), and a Federal court decision (Earth Island
Institute v. Hogarth, 494 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2007)). These components
of the measure establish conditions under which tuna products may
voluntarily be labeled dolphin-safe. Among other requirements, these
conditions do not allow tuna products to be labeled dolphin-safe if
they contain tuna that was caught by intentionally encircling and
deploying purse seine nets on dolphins. On June 13, 2012, the WTO
Dispute Settlement Body adopted WTO Panel and Appellate Body reports
ruling that the U.S. measure accords less favorable treatment to
Mexican tuna products and therefore is inconsistent with Article 2.1 of
the TBT Agreement.
In response to this finding, on July 9, 2013, NMFS published a
final rule under the DPCIA titled ``Enhanced Document Requirements to
Support Use of the Dolphin Safe Label on Tuna Products'' (78 FR 40997)
that amended regulations at 50 CFR part 216, subpart H. The 2013 final
rule modified the labeling conditions to more fully address the risks
to dolphins posed by tuna fishing outside the eastern tropical Pacific
Ocean (ETP) large purse seine fishery (i.e., where the vessel has a
carrying capacity of more than 400 short tons (362.8 mt)).\1\
Specifically, the 2013 final rule amended the eligibility condition
that tuna product may not be labeled dolphin-safe if a dolphin was
killed or seriously injured in the set or other gear deployment in
which the tuna was caught so that the condition now applied to all tuna
caught in any fishery in the world. The 2013 final rule further
required that a captain's certificate stating that this condition was
met was required for tuna caught by any eligible method in any fishery
to be labeled dolphin-safe. Additionally, all dolphin-safe tuna must be
kept physically separate, from the time of catch through the time of
unloading, from non-dolphin-safe tuna.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The ETP is defined as the waters of the Pacific Ocean
bounded by 40[deg] N. latitude, 40[deg] S. latitude, 160[deg] W.
longitude and the coastlines of North, Central and South America (50
CFR 216.3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The WTO established a compliance panel on January 27, 2014, to
determine whether the 2013 final rule brought the dolphin-safe labeling
requirements into compliance with the United States' WTO obligations.
The compliance panel circulated its final report on April 14, 2015. In
that report, the compliance panel found that the amended dolphin-safe
labeling measure discriminates against Mexican tuna product in breach
of Article 2.1 of the TBT Agreement and Articles I:1 and III:4 of the
GATT 1994. The compliance panel considered three regulatory
distinctions of the amended measure: (1) The ineligibility for the
dolphin-safe label of tuna caught by setting on dolphins; (2) the
certification requirements; and, (3) the tracking and verification
requirements.
First, the compliance panel found that the provisions in U.S. law
making any dolphin-safe label ineligible to be used for tuna product
containing tuna caught by setting on dolphins and the potential
eligibility of tuna caught by other methods was consistent with Article
2.1 of the TBT Agreement and, while inconsistent with Articles I:1 and
III:4 of the GATT 1994, was justified under Article XX of the GATT
1994. Second, the compliance panel found that the certification
requirements discriminated against Mexican tuna product because it is
more burdensome for Mexican producers to comply with the certification
requirements of the Agreement on the International Dolphin Conservation
Program (AIDCP) than the certification requirements applicable outside
the ETP large purse seine fishery. In the compliance panel's view, this
difference in burden was not justified given the lack of training for
captains making such certifications outside the ETP large purse seine
fishery as well as the perceived ``gaps'' in coverage of the
determination provisions. Third, the compliance panel found that the
tracking and verification requirements discriminated against Mexican
tuna produced from large purse seine vessels in the ETP because it was
more burdensome for Mexican producers to comply with the AIDCP tracking
and verification requirements than the tracking and verification
requirements applicable for fisheries other than the ETP large purse
seine fishery and that this burden could not be justified.
[[Page 15446]]
The United States and Mexico both appealed aspects of the
compliance panel's report, and the WTO Appellate Body issued its report
on November 20, 2015. The Appellate Body found that the United States
had not brought its measure into compliance with its WTO obligations.
Specifically, the Appellate Body found the amended dolphin-safe
labeling measure to be inconsistent with the non-discrimination
obligations contained in the TBT Agreement and the GATT 1994 because
the measure had a detrimental impact on the conditions of competition
for Mexican tuna product in the U.S. market and that this detrimental
impact reflected prohibited discrimination in light of the perceived
``gaps'' in the design of the determination provisions. In particular,
the Appellate Body criticized the determination provisions because, as
designed, the determination provisions allowed for the possibility that
no observer requirement would be imposed where a ``regular and
significant'' dolphin mortality or serious injury is occurring in a
purse seine fishery without a regular and significant tuna-dolphin
association, or where a ``regular and significant'' tuna-dolphin
association is occurring in a non-purse seine fishery without ``regular
and significant'' dolphin mortality or serious injury.
On February 5, 2016, NMFS published a proposed rule (81 FR 6210)
entitled ``Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act;
Seafood Import Monitoring Program,'' also known as the Traceability
Proposed Rule. The Traceability Proposed Rule proposes establishing
filing and recordkeeping procedures for certain fish and fish products
to combat illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and seafood
fraud in the U.S. market. NMFS has incorporated into this interim final
rule the approach taken in the Traceability Proposed Rule with regard
to chain of custody documentation requirements.
The Action
This interim final rule makes six amendments to the regulations, as
explained below, none of which affect the labeling of tuna originating
from the ETP large purse seine fishery.
First, effective upon publication in the Federal Register, this
interim final rule revises the determination provisions that previously
had been codified at 50 CFR 216.91(a)(2)(i) and (a)(4)(iii), and which
are now codified at 50 CFR 216.91(a)(3)(v). Under the amended
determination provisions, the Assistant Administrator now has the
authority to require, as a condition for labeling tuna product dolphin-
safe, that an on-board observer (in addition to the captain) certify
the tuna was caught in a manner that meets the dolphin-safe labeling
requirements where the Assistant Administrator has determined that a
fishery has a regular and significant association between tuna and
dolphins (similar to the association between dolphins and tuna in the
ETP) and/or has a regular and significant mortality or serious injury
of dolphins. This expanded authority applies equally to purse seine and
other gear-type tuna fisheries other than the ETP large purse seine
fishery (where an observer certificate is already required) and large-
scale driftnet fisheries (which produce tuna that is ineligible for the
label). See 50 CFR 216.91(a)(1) and (a)(2). In the case of either
``regular and significant'' determination, only observers participating
in a national or international observer program acceptable to the
Assistant Administrator would be able to provide the necessary observer
certifications.
NMFS notes that while the revised regulations provide for one
standard for making determinations, NMFS will interpret in 50 CFR
216.91(a)(3)(v) consistent with both the DPCIA and U.S. WTO obligations
on a fishery-by-fishery basis. In particular, NMFS will take into
account that the DPCIA instructs NMFS to impose an observer requirement
where the Assistant Administrator has determined that ``a regular and
significant association occurs between dolphins and tuna (similar to
the association between dolphins and tuna in the ETP)'' for purse seine
fisheries outside the ETP, while the DPCIA affords NMFS more discretion
to impose an observer requirement either when evaluating other types of
fisheries or when evaluating all 50 CFR 216.91(a)(3) fisheries under
the mortality or serious injury prong of 50 CFR 216.91(a)(3)(v). See 16
U.S.C. 1385(d)(1)(B)(i) and (D). At the same time, NMFS will also take
U.S. WTO obligations into account in any exercise of such discretion.
Second, effective upon publication in the Federal Register, this
interim final rule revises the determination provisions under which the
Assistant Administrator is authorized to impose an observer
certification requirement if a tuna fishery is determined to have
either a ``regular and significant'' association of dolphins or a
``regular and significant'' mortality or serious injury of dolphins. If
the Assistant Administrator makes such a determination, NMFS will now
also require a government certificate validating: (1) The catch
documentation; (2) whether the tuna or tuna products meet the dolphin-
safe labeling standards under 50 CFR 216.91; and (3) the chain of
custody information reported to the U.S. Government or maintained by
the importer of record or the U.S. processor, as applicable.
Third, this interim final rule combines the previously separate
categories of ``non-ETP purse seine vessel'' (50 CFR 216.91(a)(2)) and
``Other fisheries'' (50 CFR 216.91(a)(4)) into one category under the
title ``Other fisheries'' (revised 50 CFR 216.91(a)(3)). Under the
revised 50 CFR 216.91(a)(3)(iii), captains of all vessels in fisheries
not covered in paragraphs (a)(1) (i.e., the ETP large purse seine
fishery) and (a)(2) (i.e., a large-scale driftnet fishery) must certify
that, no purse seine net or other fishing gear was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught, and that no dolphins were killed or
seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught. This revision makes clear that tuna does not meet the
dolphin-safe standard if it is harvested by vessels that intentionally
deploy fishing gear (regardless of the type) on dolphins. Moreover,
this revision also makes clear that captains of all vessels not covered
by 50 CFR 216.91(a)(1) (where the same certification is already
required) and (a)(2) (which produces tuna that is ineligible for the
label) must make such a certification. To be clear, a non-purse seine
vessel intentionally deploys its fishing gear on a dolphin(s) where a
vessel intentionally targets a dolphin(s) with the fishing gear.
However, as is the case with intentional encirclement, the deployment
must be intentional, and where a dolphin(s) is seen only after the
fishing gear was deployed, then the vessel did not intentionally deploy
the fishing gear on a dolphin(s). This revised certification will apply
to tuna caught by a vessel on a fishing trip that begins on or after
May 21, 2016. Until that date, the certifications provided by
paragraphs (a)(3)(i) or (ii), as applicable, will continue to apply.
Fourth, this interim final rule modifies the FCO and the
requirements for the associated captain's statement by requiring
captains of vessels operating in ``other fisheries'' to certify
completion of a NMFS Tuna Tracking and Verification Program (TTVP)
dolphin-safe training course (training course). The training course
will include information on: (1) Identifying dolphins of the taxonomic
family Delphinidae; (2) identifying intentional gear deployment on or
encirclement of dolphins; (3) identifying dolphin
[[Page 15447]]
mortality and serious injury; and (4) physically separating dolphin-
safe tuna from non-dolphin-safe tuna from the time of capture through
unloading. The training course is available on the NMFS TTVP Internet
home page at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe. Captain
certification of completion of the training course applies to all tuna
product labeled dolphin-safe if the product contains tuna harvested on
a fishing trip that begins on or after May 21, 2016. Existing captain's
statement templates found at the NMFS TTVP Internet home page have been
modified and may be used to certify completion of the NMFS TTVP
training course. The 2013 final rule required all completed FCOs to
have associated captain's statement certifications for all tuna
harvested other than the ETP large purse seine fishery.
As a starting point, NMFS will translate the TTVP training course
into a sufficient number of languages to ensure that the vast majority
of languages spoken by captains producing tuna for the U.S. tuna
product market are covered by the translation. Internet links to the
translated courses will be posted on the TTVP Internet home page at
http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe as they become available. In
addition to posting on the Internet translated versions of the training
course, the United States Government will send a d[eacute]marche to
embassies of all countries that supply tuna product to the United
States, explaining the new requirements and enclosing a copy of the
training course. The d[eacute]marche will also include the TTVP
Internet home page address, as well as a copy of this interim final
rule. Providing this information to embassies is intended to aid in
disseminating the training course to tuna captains as well as in the
dissemination of the new U.S. dolphin-safe tuna labeling requirements
to processors.
Fifth, this interim final rule requires U.S. processors and
importers of record to collect and retain for 2 years, information on
each point in the chain of custody regarding the shipment of the tuna
or tuna product to the point of entry into U.S. commerce as a
recordkeeping requirement on the part of that U.S. processor or
importer of record. The information must be maintained at the place of
business, or be accessible from that place of business through, for
example, an Internet connection to an off site server where the
information is held. This is to ensure that information is readily
available to NMFS to allow it to trace the tuna or tuna product back to
the point of harvest. As is the case for the Traceability Proposed Rule
(discussed above), such information would include records regarding
each custodian of the tuna or tuna product, including, as applicable,
transshippers, processors, storage facilities, and wholesalers/
distributors. The retained information must be provided to NMFS upon
request and must be sufficient for NMFS to conduct a trace back to
verify that the tuna product certified as dolphin-safe to NMFS, in
fact, meets the dolphin-safe labeling requirements for such
certification. NMFS expects that typical supply chain records that are
kept in the normal course of business, including declarations by
harvesting and carrier vessels, bills of lading and forms voluntarily
used or required under foreign government or international monitoring
programs, which include such information as the identity of the
custodian, the type of processing, and the weight of the product, would
provide sufficient information for NMFS to conduct a trace back. In
addition, the information maintained must be sufficient in order to
trace any non-dolphin-safe tuna loaded onto the vessel back to one or
more storage wells or other storage locations for a particular fishing
trip to prove that such non-dolphin-safe tuna was kept physically
separate from dolphin-safe tuna through unloading.
These chain of custody requirements augment existing requirements
that dolphin-safe tuna shall, from the time of capture, during
unloading, storage, transfer, and processing, be kept separate from
non-dolphin safe tuna set out in 50 CFR 216.91(a)(4) and 50 CFR
216.93(c)(2) and (3). These chain of custody requirements apply to all
tuna product labeled dolphin-safe if the product contains tuna
harvested on a fishing trip that begins on or after May 21, 2016.
Sixth, this interim final rule makes several non-substantive
modifications to 50 CFR 216.91 including redesignating regulatory text
paragraphs; updating Internet Web addresses to the NMFS TTVP Internet
home page located at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe; and
changing the word ``distributor'' to ``wholesaler/distributor'' for
consistency in the regulatory text. NMFS is publishing 50 CFR 216.91 in
its entirety (including provisions that were not changed) for the
convenience of readers and to improve clarity.
NMFS has broad authority to issue regulations to implement the
DPCIA, including specifically the authority to establish a domestic
tracking and verification program to track tuna labeled dolphin-safe,
and to adjust such regulations as appropriate to implement an
international tracking and verification program (16 U.S.C. 1385(f)).
Among other things, this rule is expected to better ensure that
consumers are more easily able to determine the veracity of dolphin-
safe labels on tuna products they purchase, in accordance with the
findings of the DPCIA (16 U.S.C. 1385(b)).
Classification
The NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this interim
final rule is consistent with the DPCIA and other applicable laws.
Administrative Procedure Act
NOAA finds good cause to issue this interim final rule without
advance notice in a proposed rule or the opportunity for public
comment, and to make the rule effective immediately without providing a
30-day delay, because the limited time available to the United States
to come into compliance with its WTO obligations makes advance notice
and comment or delaying the effectiveness contrary to the public
interest. Specifically, any delay in the effective date of the rule
would delay the federal government's ability to have the United States
come into compliance with its WTO obligations. Furthermore, any delay
may adversely affect U.S. trade as well as the federal government's
ability to respond to Mexico's request for authorization to suspend the
application to the United States of WTO concessions or other
obligations, which could result in Mexico taking action that adversely
affects U.S. interests (e.g., increasing tariffs on U.S. goods).
However, NMFS will consider public comments on this interim final rule
and issue a final rule.
Executive Order 12866
This interim final rule has been determined to be not significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This interim final rule contains two new collection-of-information
requirements subject to PRA under control numbers 0648-0335 and 0648-
0387. These requirements have been approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). There is no additional public reporting burden for
OMB control number 0648-0335, titled ``Fisheries Certificate of
Origin,'' as collection of an FCO and/or a captain's certification are
already required to be submitted to NMFS. The additional public
reporting burden under OMB control number 0648-0387, titled
[[Page 15448]]
``International Dolphin Conservation Program,'' is estimated to average
30 minutes per response for chain of custody recordkeeping, including
the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection-of-information. NMFS will ensure compliance with PRA
requirements before requiring new observer certifications that might be
triggered by a determination of the Assistant Administrator under
sections 216.91(a)(3)(v) and (a)(5)(ii) of this interim final rule.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection-of-information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 216
Commercial fisheries, Food labeling, Imports, Marine mammals,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seafood.
Dated: March 17, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 216 is amended
as follows:
PART 216--REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TAKING AND IMPORTING OF MARINE
MAMMALS
Subpart H--Dolphin Safe Tuna Labeling
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 216, subpart H, continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1385.
0
2. Section 216.91 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 216.91 Dolphin-safe labeling standards.
(a) It is a violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act (15 U.S.C. 45) for any producer, importer, exporter, wholesaler/
distributor, or seller of any tuna products that are exported from or
offered for sale in the United States to include on the label of those
products the term ``dolphin-safe'' or any other term or symbol that
claims or suggests that the tuna contained in the products were
harvested using a method of fishing that is not harmful to dolphins if
the products contain tuna harvested:
(1) ETP large purse seine vessel. In the ETP by a purse seine
vessel of greater than 400 st (362.8 mt) carrying capacity unless:
(i) The documentation requirements for dolphin-safe tuna under
Sec. Sec. 216.92 and 216.93 are met;
(ii) No dolphins were killed or seriously injured during the sets
in which the tuna were caught; and
(iii) None of the tuna were caught on a trip using a purse seine
net intentionally deployed on or to encircle dolphins, provided that
this paragraph (a)(1)(iii) will not apply if the Assistant
Administrator publishes a notification in the Federal Register
announcing a finding under 16 U.S.C. 1385(g)(2) that the intentional
deployment of purse seine nets on or encirclement of dolphins is not
having a significant adverse impact on any depleted stock.
(2) Driftnet. By a vessel engaged in large-scale driftnet fishing;
or
(3) Other fisheries. By a vessel in a fishery other than one
described in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section unless such
product is accompanied as described in Sec. 216.93(d), (e), or (f), as
appropriate, by:
(i) For tuna caught in a purse seine fishery outside the ETP by a
vessel on a fishing trip that began before July 13, 2013, a written
statement executed by the Captain of the vessel certifying that no
purse seine net was intentionally deployed on or used to encircle
dolphins during the particular trip on which the tuna was harvested.
(ii) For tuna caught by a vessel on a fishing trip that began on or
after July 13, 2013, a written statement executed by the Captain of the
vessel certifying:
(A) For a purse seine vessel outside the ETP, that no purse seine
net was intentionally deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during
the fishing trip in which the tuna were caught, and that no dolphins
were killed or seriously injured in the sets in which the tuna were
caught;
(B) For a vessel other than one described in paragraph
(a)(3)(ii)(A) of this section, that no dolphins were killed or
seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught.
(iii) [Reserved]
(iv) For tuna caught in a fishery where the Assistant Administrator
has determined that observers participating in a national or
international observer program are qualified and authorized to issue
observer statements for purposes of the dolphin-safe labeling program,
and where such an observer is on board the vessel, a written statement
executed by the observer, or by an authorized representative of a
nation participating in the observer program based on information from
the observer. Any determination by the Assistant Administrator shall be
announced in a notice published in the Federal Register. Determinations
under this paragraph (a)(3)(iv) will also be publicized on the Web site
of the NMFS Tuna Tracking and Verification Program (http://www.nnmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe). The written statement shall
certify:
(A) That no dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets
or other gear deployments in which the tuna were caught; and,
(B) In purse seine fisheries, that no purse seine net was
intentionally deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the trip
on which the tuna were caught.
(v) For tuna caught in a fishery in which the Assistant
Administrator has determined that either a regular and significant
association between dolphins and tuna (similar to the association
between dolphins and tuna in the ETP) or a regular and significant
mortality or serious injury of dolphins is occurring, a written
statement, executed by the Captain of the vessel and an observer
participating in a national or international program acceptable to the
Assistant Administrator, unless the Assistant Administrator determines
an observer statement is unnecessary. Determinations under this
paragraph (a)(3)(v) will also be publicized on the Web site of the NMFS
Tuna Tracking and Verification Program (http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe). The written statement shall certify that:
(A) No fishing gear was intentionally deployed on or used to
encircle dolphins during the trip on which the tuna were caught;
(B) No dolphins were killed or seriously injured in the sets or
other gear deployments in which the tuna were caught; and
(C) Any relevant requirements of paragraph (a)(4) of this section
were complied with during the trip on which the tuna were caught.
(4) Other fisheries--segregation. In a fishery other than one
described in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section on a fishing trip
that began on or after July 13, 2013 unless the tuna caught in sets or
gear deployments designated as dolphin-safe was stored physically
separate from tuna caught in a non-dolphin-safe set or other gear
deployment by the use of netting, other material, or separate storage
areas from the time of capture through unloading. If tuna caught in a
set or other gear deployment where a dolphin was killed
[[Page 15449]]
or seriously injured is not stored physically separate from dolphin-
safe tuna as stated in Sec. 216.93(c)(2)(i) or (c)(3)(i), as
applicable, all tuna inside the storage well or other storage location
shall be considered non-dolphin-safe.
(5) [Reserved]
(b) It is a violation of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission
Act (15 U.S.C. 45) to willingly and knowingly use a label referred to
in this section in a campaign or effort to mislead or deceive consumers
about the level of protection afforded dolphins under the IDCP.
(c) A tuna product that is labeled with the official mark,
described in Sec. 216.95, may not be labeled with any other label or
mark that refers to dolphins, porpoises, or marine mammals.
0
2. Effective May 21, 2016, Sec. 216.91 is further amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(3)(ii); and
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(3)(iii) and (a)(5).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 216.91 Dolphin-safe labeling standards.
(a) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) For tuna caught by a vessel on a fishing trip that began on or
after July 13, 2013, and before May 21, 2016, a written statement
executed by the Captain of the vessel certifying:
* * * * *
(iii) For tuna caught by a vessel on a fishing trip that began on
or after May 21, 2016, a written statement executed by the Captain of
the vessel certifying that:
(A) No purse seine net or other fishing gear was intentionally
deployed on or used to encircle dolphins during the fishing trip in
which the tuna were caught, and that no dolphins were killed or
seriously injured in the sets or other gear deployments in which the
tuna were caught; and
(B) The Captain of the vessel has completed the NMFS Tuna Tracking
and Verification Program dolphin-safe captain's training course. The
NMFS Tuna Tracking and Verification Program dolphin-safe captain's
training course is available on the Web site of the NMFS Tuna Tracking
and Verification Program at http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/dolphinsafe.
* * * * *
(5) Other fisheries--chain of custody recordkeeping. By a vessel in
a fishery other than one described in paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this
section unless:
(i) For tuna designated dolphin-safe that was harvested on a
fishing trip that began on or after May 21, 2016, in addition to any
other applicable requirements:
(A) The importer of record or U.S. processor of tuna or tuna
products, as applicable, maintains information on the complete chain of
custody, including storage facilities, transshippers, processors, re-
processors, and wholesalers/distributors to enable dolphin-safe tuna to
be distinguished from non-dolphin-safe tuna from the time it is caught
to the time it is ready for retail sale;
(B) The importer of record or the U.S. processor, as appropriate,
ensures that information is readily available to NMFS upon request to
allow it to trace any non-dolphin-safe tuna loaded onto the vessel back
to one or more storage wells or other storage locations for a
particular fishing trip and to show that such non-dolphin-safe tuna was
kept physically separate from dolphin-safe tuna through unloading.
(ii) For tuna designated dolphin-safe that was harvested in a
fishery about which the Assistant Administrator made a determination
under paragraph (a)(3)(v) of this section, and harvested on a fishing
trip that begins on or after 60 days after the date of the Federal
Register notice of that determination, the tuna or tuna products are
accompanied by valid documentation signed by a representative of the
vessel flag nation or the processing nation (if processed in another
nation) certifying that:
(A) The catch documentation is correct;
(B) The tuna or tuna products meet the dolphin-safe labeling
standards under this section; and
(C) The chain of custody information is correct.
(iii) The information referred to in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii)
of this section is maintained at the place of business of the importer
of record or the U.S. processor, as applicable, for a period of 2 years
from the date of the import or receipt, and be made available to NMFS
for inspection upon request.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-06450 Filed 3-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P