[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12132-12133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05134]
[[Page 12132]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-369 and 50-370; NRC-2016-0049]
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and
2; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an exemption for Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-9 and
NPF-17, issued to Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke, the licensee) for
operation of McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (McGuire), located
near Huntersville, North Carolina. The licensee requested an exemption
from certain physical inventory requirements because the inventory
items are no longer in service and are not readily accessible. The NRC
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) documenting its finding. The
NRC concluded that the proposed actions will have no significant
environmental impact. Accordingly, the NRC staff is issuing its final
EA and a final finding of no significant impact (FONSI) associated with
the proposed exemption.
DATES: The environmental assessment referenced in this document is
available on March 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0049 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0049. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: [email protected].
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if that document
is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G. Edward Miller, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2481, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an exemption from section
74.19(c) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), for
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-9 and NPF-17, issued to Duke for
operation of McGuire, located near Huntersville, North Carolina.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has reviewed the requirements in
10 CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and determined that an EA is the
appropriate form of environmental review for the requested action. In
accordance with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC prepared an EA documenting its
finding. Based on the results of the EA, the NRC concluded that the
proposed actions will have no significant environmental impact and is
issuing this final FONSI.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The regulation in 10 CFR 74.19(c) requires, in part, ``Other than
licensees subject to sections 74.31, 74.33, 74.41, or 74.51, each
licensee who is authorized to possess special nuclear material, at any
one time and site location, in a quantity greater than 350 grams of
contained uranium-235, uranium-233, or plutonium, or any combination
thereof, shall conduct a physical inventory of all special nuclear
material in its possession under license at intervals not to exceed 12
months.'' By application dated August 17, 2015, as supplemented by
letter dated October 6, 2015 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML15239B240 and
ML15300A282, respectively), the licensee requested an exemption from
certain recordkeeping requirements in 10 CFR 74.19(c).
Specifically, the licensee requested an exemption for conducting a
physical inventory of the moveable incore detectors in their Moveable
Incore Detector (MIDS) system. The moveable incore detectors are no
longer in service and are stored in a location where they are not
readily accessible except during plant outages.
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed exemption to the recordkeeping requirements of 10 CFR
74.19(c) is needed to grant the licensee relief from the physical
inventory requirements for the movable incore detectors in their MIDS
system, which contain special nuclear material and are required to be
listed on their physical inventory. The licensee states that the
moveable incore detectors have been removed from service and are stored
inside shielded storage pipes (sleeves) located inside the reactor
buildings concrete inner shield wall, making them physically
inaccessible. The licensee also states that modifications are being
made to ensure that the moveable incore detectors meet the requirements
of inaccessibility. The modifications involve installing tamper-evident
seals to ensure the incore detectors are not accessed and the seals
will be verified every outage.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and
concludes that the proposed exemption would not significantly increase
the probability or consequences of accidents. No changes would be made
in the types of effluents that may be released offsite. There would be
no significant increase in the amount of any effluent released offsite.
There would be no significant increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no significant
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed
action would not have any foreseeable impacts to land, air, or water
resources, including impacts to biota. In addition, there are also no
known socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts associated with
such proposed action. Therefore, there are no significant non-
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Accordingly, the NRC concludes that there are no significant
environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed actions, the NRC staff considered
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative).
Denial of the exemption request would result in no
[[Page 12133]]
change in current environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of
the proposed exemption and the ``no action'' alternative are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
The action does not involve the use of any different resources than
those previously considered in the ``Final Environmental Statement
Related to the Operation of William B. McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1
and 2,'' dated January, 1981, and NUREG-1437, Supplement 8, ``Generic
Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants,
Regarding McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2, Final Report,'' dated
December 2002 (ADAMS Accession No. ML030020184).
Agencies and Persons Consulted
The staff did not enter into consultation with any other Federal
Agency or with the State of North Carolina regarding the environmental
impact of the proposed action.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
On the basis of the environmental assessment, the NRC concludes
that the proposed exemption will not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined
not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed
action. Other than the licensee's letter dated August 17, 2015, and
supplemented October 6, 2015, there are no other environmental
documents associated with this review.
This document is available for public inspection as indicated
above.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day of February 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
G. Edward Miller,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch II-1, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016-05134 Filed 3-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P