[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79283-79292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31907]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

45 CFR Part 1330

RIN 0985-AA12


National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research

AGENCY: National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research; Administration for Community Living; HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement the Workforce Innovation 
and Opportunity Act of 2014 and reflect the transfer of the National 
Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation 
Research (NIDILRR) from the Department of Education to the Department 
of Health and Human Services. The previous regulations were issued by 
the Department of Education. The rulemaking will consolidate the 
NIDILRR regulations into a single part, align the regulations with the 
current statute and HHS policies, and will provide guidance to NIDILRR 
grantees.

DATES: Comments are due on or before February 19, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments in one of following ways (no 
duplicates, please): Written comments may be submitted through any of 
the methods specified below. Please do not submit duplicate comments.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: You may (and we encourage you 
to) submit electronic comments on this regulation at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions under the ``submit a 
comment'' tab. Attachments should be in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or 
Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft Word.
     Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail: You may mail written 
comments to the following address only: Administration for Community 
Living, Attention: NIDILRR NPRM, U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services, Washington, DC 20201. Please allow sufficient time for mailed 
comments to be received before the close of the comment period.
     Individuals with a Disability: We will provide an 
appropriate accommodation, including alternative formats, upon request. 
To make such a request, please contact Marlina Moses-Gaither, (202) 
795-7409 (Voice) or at [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Pugh, Administration for 
Community Living, telephone (202) 795-7422 (Voice). This is not a toll-
free number. This document will be made available in alternative 
formats upon request.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014

    The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 2014 (``WIOA,'' 
Pub. L. 113-128), signed into law on July 22, 2014, included 
significant changes to Title II of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The 
first of these is the insertion of a new name, the National Institute 
on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
(``NIDILRR,'' which was previously the National Institute on Disability 
and Rehabilitation Research). WIOA also relocates NIDILRR from the 
Department of Education (``ED'') to the Administration for Community 
Living (``ACL'') of the Department of Health and Human Services.

II. Programs Authorized by Title II of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 
as Amended by WIOA

A. Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research Projects 
and Centers

    The purpose of the Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects 
and Centers program is to plan and conduct research, development, 
demonstrations, training, dissemination, and related activities, 
including international activities, to maximize the full inclusion and 
integration into society, employment, independent living, family 
support, and economic and social self-sufficiency of individuals with 
disabilities, especially individuals with the most severe disabilities, 
and improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.
    To this end, NIDILRR provides grants to establish and support:
     Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation 
Research Projects;
     Field Initiated Projects;
     Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Projects;
     Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers; and
     Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.
    Eligible entities for awards under this program include States, 
public or private agencies and organizations, institutions of higher 
education, and Indian tribes and tribal organizations.

B. Research Fellowships

    The purpose of the Research Fellowships program is to build 
research capacity by providing support to highly qualified individuals, 
including those who are individuals with disabilities, to perform 
research on rehabilitation and independent living of individuals with 
disabilities. Any individual is eligible for assistance under this 
program who has training and experience that indicate a potential for 
engaging in scientific research related to the solution of 
rehabilitation problems of individuals with disabilities. The program 
provides grants to support two categories of Fellowships: Distinguished 
Fellowships (for those with seven or more years of relevant research 
experience) and Merit Fellowships (for individuals in earlier stages of 
their careers in research).

C. Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries

    The Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries 
program provides assistance to establish innovative projects for the 
delivery, demonstration, and evaluation of comprehensive medical, 
vocational, and other rehabilitation services to meet the wide range of 
needs, including independent living, of individuals with spinal cord 
injuries. The entities eligible for an award under these Projects and 
Demonstrations are the same as for Disability and Rehabilitation 
Research Projects and Centers.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Department of Education regulations governing the National 
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research are found at 34 CFR 
parts 350, 356, and 359. Part 350 sets forth regulations addressing the 
Disability and Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program; 
part 356 sets forth regulations addressing Disability and 
Rehabilitation Research Fellowships; and part 359 sets forth 
regulations addressing Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal 
Cord Injuries. ACL proposes to streamline the NIDILRR regulations and 
to consolidate them into one part, 45 CFR part 1330. In our 
regulations, we propose to eliminate regulatory language included in 
the corresponding ED regulations that does not add further 
interpretation to the statutory language. We also propose to eliminate 
unnecessary regulatory

[[Page 79284]]

language that already exists in other documents and that need not be 
included in regulatory language, such as the application materials or 
terms and conditions of grant awards. The remainder of the proposed 
rule is derived largely from the previous ED language, with significant 
deviations noted below.
45 CFR Part 1330
    We propose creating a new part to 45 CFR, part 1330, entitled 
National Institute for Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research. We expect the Department of Education will be 
issuing regulations at a later date rescinding 34 CFR parts 350, 356, 
and 359.
Subpart A--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects and Centers Program
    Subpart A will contain general requirements for the main NIDILRR 
grant program.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.1 explains what projects are funded under the 
program, and the purpose of the program. This section will provide a 
valuable framework to potential applicants for NIDILRR funding, as the 
statute does not specify specific funding opportunities. The provisions 
largely incorporate language from the corresponding regulations at 34 
CFR 350.1 and 350.2.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.2 contains information on what entities are 
eligible to receive assistance under the program, and is derived 
substantially from the authorizing statute. It also cites other 
regulations that apply to the awards under part 1330, including the 
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit 
Requirements for HHS Awards, codified at part 75 of 45 CFR, rather than 
the EDGAR regulations which govern Department of Education financial 
assistance. In addition, all entities receiving assistance are subject 
to the HHS Grants Policy Statement, available at http://www.hhs.gov/asfr/ogapa/aboutog/hhsgps107.pdf. Other than citing to the HHS Grant 
and other applicable regulations, the proposed rule is generally the 
same as 34 CFR 350.3 and 350.4.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.3 contains definitions of terms used throughout 
the proposed rules.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.4 defines the stages of research funded by 
NIDILRR, and requires applicants to identify which stage(s) of research 
they propose to undertake. This is a significant addition as compared 
to existing ED regulations and represents a major safeguard to 
NIDILRR's scientific integrity. We believe that asking applicants to 
identify the stage of research they are proposing would help applicants 
clarify the expected outcomes of their proposed research and would help 
us better categorize our research investments and tailor our review 
process. The proposed change would also help us select reviewers who 
are knowledgeable about the topic and able to assess the relationship 
between the identified stage of research and the proposed research 
design. This would increase the likelihood that we fund research that 
contributes to the evolution of knowledge on a topic. The stages of 
research reflect a progression in the development of knowledge from 
describing the status, needs, and challenges of individuals with 
disabilities to developing and testing interventions to widespread 
adoption of effective practices, programs, and policies that improve 
their status, respond to their needs, and reduce their challenges with 
the aim of supporting independence, integration, productivity, and 
self-determination.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.5 defines the stages of development funded by 
NIDILRR, and applicants are expected to identify which stage(s) of 
development they propose to undertake. We believe that asking 
applicants to identify the stage(s) of development will help them to 
better document and communicate proposed development projects and 
expected outcomes and help us better categorize development projects, 
select reviewers, and tailor our review process. This will increase the 
likelihood of funding development projects that contribute to products 
meeting significant needs of individuals with disabilities. ACL 
especially solicits comments on these stages of development, and the 
addition of a requirement to identify the stage(s) of development 
proposed for funding.
Subpart B--Requirements for Awardees
    Subpart B contains general requirements for awardees under the 
NIDILRR research program.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.10 identifies the activities which are eligible 
to receive funding.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.11, in accordance with 29 U.S.C. 718(c), when 
so indicated in application materials or elsewhere, requires applicants 
to demonstrate in their applications how they will address the needs of 
people with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
Subpart C--Selection of Awardees
    Subpart C describes what processes NIDILRR will use in the 
selection of awardees.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.20 explains the purpose and importance of peer 
review
    Proposed Sec.  1330.21 states that peer review will be used in the 
selection of awardees. Peer review is viewed as integral to the 
continuing independence and scientific integrity of NIDILRR's work. In 
addition, 29 U.S.C. 762(f)(1) provides that the NIDILRR Director 
``shall provide for scientific peer review of all applications for 
financial assistance for research, training, and demonstration projects 
over which the Director has authority.''
    Proposed Sec.  1330.22 establishes the composition of peer review 
panels, and the factors used by the Director to select members for 
these panels. In accordance with 29 U.S.C. 762(f)(1), employees of the 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services are excluded from peer 
review panels.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.23 contains the evaluation process used in 
determining which applications to fund, including the selection of 
evaluation criteria, scoring, and notification requirements. This 
process is largely statutory, stating that the selection criteria are 
based on statutory provisions that apply to the Program.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.24 is an extensive list of criteria from which 
the Director may select in evaluating applications, and for the most 
part is verbatim of Sec.  350.54 of 34 CFR. An important proposed 
addition to Sec.  1330.24 is language which allows for the assessment 
of either hypotheses or research questions, as appropriate to the 
proposed research. In addition, language is proposed which adds clarity 
as to the evaluation of the ``appropriateness'' of research samples, 
specifically two elements: The extent to which the sampling process 
yields research participants who are appropriate to the purpose of the 
study (i.e., representative and inclusive of social, ethnic, 
socioeconomic, disability-related, and other differences that are 
important to the outcomes and implications of the research); and 
whether the sample size is sufficient to reasonably expect that 
differences resulting from the proposed intervention can be detected in 
the population being studied.
    We also propose a factor for assessing the feasibility of 
implementing a proposed research design. This factor will assist peer 
reviewers to evaluate the quality of the research design, and whether 
it can be successfully completed, especially in light of the time and 
resources available. We propose to add this assessment factor to ensure 
that we sponsor high-quality research that can be carried out by the 
applicant. Without a factor related to

[[Page 79285]]

feasibility, we could fund technically well-designed research proposals 
that cannot realistically be completed, given limitations in time, 
resources, and current knowledge.
    Additional proposed factors in this rule not included in ED 
regulations include the extent to which applicants obtain and use input 
from individuals with disabilities and other stakeholders to shape the 
proposed research activities. Another proposed factor requires that 
applicants identify and justify the stage of research to establish that 
the proposed research has a foundation in the current state of 
knowledge on the topic.
    An important proposed addition to this section is a factor which 
allows for the assessment of development projects. Proposed factors and 
sub-factors are intended to improve the rigor and clarity of 
documentation and communication for proposed development projects; 
facilitate high quality peer-review; and subsequent management and 
oversight of funded projects. Conceptually, these factors span the 
research basis supporting a significant need and target population for 
a product; methodological elements common and appropriate to most 
development projects; and demonstration that the product is or is 
likely to be adopted by the target population and used for its intended 
purpose. ACL particularly solicits comments on this factor.
    Proposed Sec.  1330.25 contains selection criteria specifically for 
field-initiated priorities New to proposed Sec.  1330.25 is authority 
for NIDILRR to fund out of rank order for all competitions conducted 
under Sec.  1330.25 provided that the application receives a peer 
review score of at least 80 percent or more of available points and 
represents a unique opportunity to advance the rehabilitation knowledge 
to improve the lives of individuals with disabilities, complements 
research investment already planned or funded, or addresses research in 
a new and promising way. This will allow NIDILRR to take advantage of a 
unique opportunity to advance the field, complement our investment in a 
particular research area, or build capacity in one of our research 
domains or broad priority areas, while maintaining quality standards.
Subpart D--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Fellowships
    Subpart D contains information on programs awarding funding to 
research fellows, along with the eligibility requirements and selection 
criteria for these programs. This is significantly streamlined as 
compared to part 356 in the ED rules, but is included to signify that 
the program discussed in that part continue under HHS' administration. 
In keeping with established ED practice, these fellowships will be 
funded by grants to eligible fellows, as HHS believes that this 
supports the development of new and existing researchers in the fields 
of disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research.
Subpart E--Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries
    Subpart E contains information on projects focusing on spinal cord 
injuries and eligibility requirements for these awards. This is 
significantly streamlined as compared to part 359 in the ED rules, but 
is included for the reasons stated in subpart D.
    Existing ED regulations not carried over to this proposed rule are 
as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             ED citation                                  Title                         Reason for deletion
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   350.10........................  What are the general requirements for       Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Disability and Rehabilitation Research      Act, does not add new
                                        Projects?                                   information.
Sec.   350.11........................  What are the general requirements for a     Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Field-Initiated Project?                    Act, does not add new
                                                                                    information.
Sec.   350.12........................  What are the general requirements for an    Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training   Act, does not add new
                                        Project?                                    information.
Part 350, Subpart C..................  What Rehabilitation Research and Training   Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Centers Does the Secretary Assist?          Act, does not add new
                                                                                    information.
Part 350, Subpart D..................  What Rehabilitation Engineering Research    Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Centers Does the Secretary Assist?          Act, does not add new
                                                                                    information. Requirements
                                                                                    for advisory committees from
                                                                                    Sec.   350.34 and Sec.
                                                                                    350.35 will be included in
                                                                                    application materials and
                                                                                    grant terms & conditions,
                                                                                    where appropriate.
Sec.   350.41........................  What State agency review must an applicant  No longer used by NIDILRR.
                                        under the Disability and Rehabilitation
                                        Research Projects and Centers Program
                                        obtain?
Part 350, Subpart G..................  What Conditions Must Be Met After an        Requirements are either
                                        Award?                                      already stated in the
                                                                                    statute or are subject to
                                                                                    the HHS-specific award
                                                                                    requirements. In addition,
                                                                                    other post-award conditions
                                                                                    may be included in
                                                                                    application materials and
                                                                                    grant terms & conditions,
                                                                                    where appropriate.
Sec.   356.3.........................  What regulations apply to this program?     Same regulations apply as in
                                                                                    Sec.   1330.4.
Sec.   356.4.........................  What definitions apply to this program?     Not used by NIDILRR.
Part 356, Subpart B..................  What Kinds of Activities Does the           Not used by NIDILRR.
                                        Department Support Under This Program?
Part 356, Subpart C..................  How Does One Apply For Assistance Under     Subject to same requirements
                                        This Program?                               as established in Sec.
                                                                                    1330.10.
Part 356, Subpart D..................  How Does the Secretary Select a Fellow?     Subject to same criteria as
                                                                                    established in Sec.
                                                                                    1330.23.
Part 356, Subpart E..................  What Conditions Have To Be Met By A         When not already stated in
                                        Fellow?                                     statute, requirements will
                                                                                    be included in application
                                                                                    materials, terms &
                                                                                    conditions, or contract
                                                                                    requirements where
                                                                                    appropriate.
Part 356, Subpart F..................  What Are the Administrative                 When not already stated in
                                        Responsibilities of a Fellow?               statute, requirements will
                                                                                    be included in application
                                                                                    materials, terms &
                                                                                    conditions, or contract
                                                                                    requirements where
                                                                                    appropriate.
Sec.   359.3.........................  What regulations apply to this program?     Same regulations apply as in
                                                                                    Sec.   1330.4.
Sec.   359.4.........................  What definitions apply to this program?     Not used by NIDILRR.

[[Page 79286]]

 
Part 359, Subpart B..................  What Kinds of Activities Does the           Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        Secretary Assist Under This Program?        Act, does not add new
                                                                                    information.
Sec.   359.30........................  How is peer review conducted under this     Same as in part 1330, subpart
                                        program?                                    C.
Sec.   359.31........................  What selection criteria does the Secretary  Same as in part 1330, subpart
                                        use in reviewing applications under this    C.
                                        program?
Sec.   359.32........................  What additional factors does the Secretary  Summarizes Rehabilitation
                                        consider in making a grant under this       Act, does not add new
                                        program?                                    information.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Impact Analysis

A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). The 
Department has determined that this proposed rule is consistent with 
the priorities and principles set forth in Executive Order 12866. 
Executive Order 12866 encourages agencies, as appropriate, to provide 
the public with meaningful participation in the regulatory process. The 
rulemaking implements the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act of 
2014. In developing the final rule, we will consider input we received 
from the public including stakeholders. This proposed rule is not being 
treated as a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f)(1) of 
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the proposed rule has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    The Secretary certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354), that this regulation will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
The primary impact of this proposed regulation is on entities applying 
for NIDILRR funding opportunities, specifically researchers, States, 
public or private agencies and organizations, institutions of higher 
education, and Indian tribes and tribal organizations. The proposed 
regulation does not have a significant economic impact on these 
entities. This proposed rule is in fact significantly shorter than, but 
with identical compliance requirements to, the regulations it replaces.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we are required to 
provide 60-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public 
comment before an information collection request is submitted to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. We are 
not introducing any new information collections in this proposed rule 
however, nor revising reporting requirements.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Unfunded 
Mandates Act) requires that a covered agency prepare a budgetary impact 
statement before promulgating a rule that includes any Federal mandate 
that may result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, 
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million, adjusted 
for inflation, or more in any one year.
    If a covered agency must prepare a budgetary impact statement, 
section 205 further requires that it select the most cost-effective and 
least burdensome alternatives that achieves the objectives of the rule 
and is consistent with the statutory requirements. In addition, section 
203 requires a plan for informing and advising any small government 
that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by a rule.
    ACL has determined that this proposed rule does not result in the 
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments in the aggregate, 
or by the private sector of more than $100 million in any one year.

E. Congressional Review

    This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 
Section 804(2).

F. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families

    Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations 
Act of 1999 requires Federal agencies to determine whether a policy or 
regulation may affect family well-being. If the agency's conclusion is 
affirmative, then the agency must prepare an impact assessment 
addressing seven criteria specified in the law. These proposed 
regulations do not have an impact on family well-being as defined in 
the legislation.

G. Executive Order 13132

    Executive Order 13132 on ``federalism'' was signed August 4, 1999. 
The purposes of the Order are: ``. . . to guarantee the division of 
governmental responsibilities between the national government and the 
States that was intended by the Framers of the Constitution, to ensure 
that the principles of federalism established by the Framers guide the 
executive departments and agencies in the formulation and 
implementation of policies, and to further the policies of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act . . .''
    The Department certifies that this proposed rule does not have a 
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the 
Federal government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    ACL is not aware of any specific State laws that would be preempted 
by the adoption of the regulation.

    Dated: December 15, 2015.
Kathy Greenlee,
Administrator, Administration for Community Living.
    Approved: December 15, 2015.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1330

    Grant programs, Research, Scholarships and fellowships.

    For reasons set forth in the preamble, under the authority at 29 
U.S.C. 709 and 3343, the Department of Health and Human Services 
proposes to add part 1330 of subchapter C title 45 to read as set forth 
below:

PART 1330--NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DISABILITY, INDEPENDENT LIVING, 
AND REHABILITATION RESEARCH

Subpart A--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects and Centers Program
Sec.
1330.1 General.
1330.2 Eligibility for assistance and other regulations and 
guidance.

[[Page 79287]]

1330.3 Definitions.
1330.4 Stages of research.
1330.5 Stages of development.
Subpart B--Requirements for Awardees
1330.10 General requirements for awardees.
1330.11 Individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
Subpart C--Selection of Awardees
1330.20 Peer review purpose.
1330.21 Peer review process.
1330.22 Composition of peer review panel.
1330.23 Evaluation process.
1330.24 Selection criteria.
1330.25 Additional considerations for field-initiated priorities.
Subpart D--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Fellowships
1330.30 Fellows program.
Subpart E--Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries
1330.40 Spinal cord injuries program.

    Authority: 29 U.S.C. 709, 3343.

Subpart A--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation 
Research Projects and Centers Program


Sec.  1330.1  General.

    (a) The Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects and Centers Program provides grants to establish and support--
    (1) The following Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research and Related Projects:
    (i) Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects;
    (ii) Field-Initiated Projects;
    (iii) Advanced Rehabilitation Research Training Projects; and
    (2) The following Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research Centers:
    (i) Rehabilitation Research and Training Centers;
    (ii) Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.
    (b) The purpose of the Disability, Independent Living, and 
Rehabilitation Research Projects and Centers Program is to plan and 
conduct research, development, demonstration projects, training, 
dissemination, and related activities, including international 
activities, to--
    (1) Develop methods, procedures, and rehabilitation technology, 
that maximize the full inclusion and integration into society, 
employment, education, independent living, family support, and economic 
and social self-sufficiency of individuals with disabilities, 
especially individuals with the most severe disabilities; and
    (2) Improve the effectiveness of services authorized under the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.


Sec.  1330.2  Eligibility for assistance and other regulations and 
guidance.

    (a) Unless otherwise stated in this part or in a determination by 
the NIDILRR Director, the following entities are eligible for an award 
under this program:
    (1) States.
    (2) Public or private agencies, including for-profit agencies.
    (3) Public or private organizations, including for-profit 
organizations.
    (4) Institutions of higher education.
    (5) Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
    (b) Other sources of regulation which may apply to awards under 
this part include but are not limited to:
    (1) 45 CFR part 16--Procedures of the Departmental Grant Appeals 
Board.
    (2) 45 CFR part 46--Protection of Human Subjects.
    (3) 45 CFR part 75--Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost 
Principles, and Audit Requirements for HHS Award.
    (4) 2 CFR parts 376 and 382--Nonprocurement Debarment and 
Suspension and Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial 
Assistance).
    (5) 45 CFR part 80--Nondiscrimination under Programs Receiving 
Federal Assistance through the Department of Health and Human 
Services--Effectuation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
    (6) 45 CFR part 81--Practice and Procedures--Practice and Procedure 
for Hearings Act under part 80 of this title.
    (7) 45 CFR part 84--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in 
Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial 
Assistance.
    (8) 45 CFR part 86--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in 
Education Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal 
Financial Assistance.
    (9) 45 CFR part 87--Equal Treatment of Faith-Based Organizations.
    (10) 45 CFR part 91--Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in 
Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance from HHS.
    (11) 45 CFR part 93--New Restrictions on Lobbying.


Sec.  1330.3  Definitions.

    As used in this part:
    (a) Secretary means the Secretary of the Department of Health and 
Human Services
    (b) Administrator means the Administrator of the Administration for 
Community Living
    (c) Director means the Director of the National Institute on 
Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.
    (d) Research is classified on a continuum from basic to applied:
    (1) Basic research is research in which the investigator is 
concerned primarily with gaining new knowledge or understanding of a 
subject without reference to any immediate application or utility.
    (2) Applied research is research in which the investigator is 
primarily interested in developing new knowledge, information, or 
understanding which can be applied to a predetermined rehabilitation 
problem or need.
    (e) Development activities use knowledge and understanding gained 
form research to create materials, devices, systems, or methods 
beneficial to the target population, including design and development 
of prototypes and processes.


Sec.  1330.4  Stages of research.

    For any Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects and Centers Program competition, the Department may require in 
the application materials for the competition that the applicant 
identify the stage(s) of research in which it will focus the work of 
its proposed project or center. The four stages of research are--
    (a) Exploration and discovery mean the stage of research that 
generates hypotheses or theories through new and refined analyses of 
data, producing observational findings and creating other sources of 
research-based information. This research stage may include identifying 
or describing the barriers to and facilitators of improved outcomes of 
individuals with disabilities, as well as identifying or describing 
existing practices, programs, or policies that are associated with 
important aspects of the lives of individuals with disabilities. 
Results achieved under this stage of research may inform the 
development of interventions or lead to evaluations of interventions or 
policies. The results of the exploration and discovery stage of 
research may also be used to inform decisions or priorities;
    (b) Intervention development means the stage of research that 
focuses on generating and testing interventions that have the potential 
to improve outcomes for individuals with disabilities. Intervention 
development involves determining the active components of possible 
interventions, developing measures that would be required to illustrate 
outcomes, specifying target populations, conducting field tests, and 
assessing the feasibility of conducting a well-designed intervention 
study.

[[Page 79288]]

Results from this stage of research may be used to inform the design of 
a study to test the efficacy of an intervention;
    (c) Intervention efficacy means the stage of research during which 
a project evaluates and tests whether an intervention is feasible, 
practical, and has the potential to yield positive outcomes for 
individuals with disabilities. Efficacy research may assess the 
strength of the relationships between an intervention and outcomes, and 
may identify factors or individual characteristics that affect the 
relationship between the intervention and outcomes. Efficacy research 
can inform decisions about whether there is sufficient evidence to 
support ``scaling-up'' an intervention to other sites and contexts. 
This stage of research may include assessing the training needed for 
wide-scale implementation of the intervention, and approaches to 
evaluation of the intervention in real-world applications; and
    (d) Scale-up evaluation means the stage of research during which a 
project analyzes whether an intervention is effective in producing 
improved outcomes for individuals with disabilities when implemented in 
a real-world setting. During this stage of research, a project tests 
the outcomes of an evidence-based intervention in different settings. 
The project examines the challenges to successful replication of the 
intervention, and the circumstances and activities that contribute to 
successful adoption of the intervention in real-world settings. This 
stage of research may also include well-designed studies of an 
intervention that has been widely adopted in practice, but lacks a 
sufficient evidence base to demonstrate its effectiveness.


Sec.  1330.5  Stages of development.

    For any Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research 
Projects and Centers Program competition, the Department may require in 
the notice inviting applications for the competition that the applicant 
identify the stage(s) of development in which it will focus the work of 
its proposed project or center. The three stages of development are--
    (a) Proof of concept means the stage of development where key 
technical challenges are resolved. Stage activities may include 
recruiting study participants, verifying product requirements; 
implementing and testing (typically in controlled contexts) key 
concepts, components, or systems, and resolving technical challenges. A 
technology transfer plan is typically developed and transfer partner(s) 
identified; and plan implementation may have started. Stage results 
establish that a product concept is feasible.
    (b) Proof of product means the stage of development where a fully-
integrated and working prototype, meeting critical technical 
requirements is created. Stage activities may include recruiting study 
participants, implementing and iteratively refining the prototype, 
testing the prototype in natural or less-controlled contexts, and 
verifying that all technical requirements are met. A technology 
transfer plan is typically ongoing in collaboration with the transfer 
partner(s). Stage results establish that a product embodiment is 
realizable.
    (c) Proof of adoption means the stage of development where a 
product is substantially adopted by its target population and used for 
its intended purpose. Stage activities typically include completing 
product refinements; and continued implementation of the technology 
transfer plan in collaboration with the transfer partner(s). Other 
activities include measuring users' awareness of the product, opinion 
of the product, decisions to adopt, use, and retain products; and 
identifying barriers and facilitators impacting product adoption. Stage 
results establish that a product is beneficial.

Subpart B--Requirements for Awardees


Sec.  1330.10  General requirements for awardees.

    (a) In carrying out a research activity under this program, an 
awardee must--
    (1) Identify one or more hypotheses or research questions;
    (2) Based on the hypotheses or research question identified, 
perform an intensive systematic study in accordance with its approved 
application directed toward--
    (i) New or full scientific knowledge; or
    (ii) Understanding of the subject or problem being studied.
    (b) In carrying out a development activity under this program, an 
awardee must create, using knowledge and understanding gained from 
research, models, methods, tools, systems, materials, devices, systems, 
applications, devices, or standards that are adopted by and beneficial 
to the target population. Development activities span one or more 
stages of development.
    (c) In carrying out a training activity under this program, an 
awardee shall conduct a planned and systematic sequence of supervised 
instruction that is designed to impart predetermined skills and 
knowledge.
    (d) In carrying out a demonstration activity under this program, an 
awardee shall apply results derived from previous research, testing, or 
practice to determine the effectiveness of a new strategy or approach.
    (e) In carrying out a utilization activity under this program, a 
grantee must relate research findings to practical applications in 
planning, policy making, program administration, and delivery of 
services to individuals with disabilities.
    (f) In carrying out a dissemination activity under this program, a 
grantee must systematically distribute information or knowledge through 
a variety of ways to potential users or beneficiaries.
    (g) In carrying out a technical assistance activity under this 
program, a grantee must provide expertise or information for use in 
problem-solving.


Sec.  1330.11  Individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.

    (a) If the director so indicates in the application materials or 
elsewhere, an applicant for assistance under this program must 
demonstrate in its application how it will address, in whole or in 
part, the needs of individuals with disabilities from minority 
backgrounds.
    (b) The approaches an applicant may take to meet this requirement 
may include one or more of the following:
    (1) Proposing project objectives addressing the needs of 
individuals with disabilities from minority backgrounds.
    (2) Demonstrating that the project will address a problem that is 
of particular significance to individuals with disabilities from 
minority backgrounds.
    (3) Demonstrating that individuals from minority backgrounds will 
be included in study samples in sufficient numbers to generate 
information pertinent to individuals with disabilities from minority 
backgrounds.
    (4) Drawing study samples and program participant rosters from 
populations or areas that include individuals from minority 
backgrounds.
    (5) Providing outreach to individuals with disabilities from 
minority backgrounds to ensure that they are aware of rehabilitation 
services, clinical care, or training offered by the project.
    (6) Disseminating materials to or otherwise increasing the access 
to disability information among minority populations.

Subpart C--Selection of Awardees


Sec.  1330.20  Peer review purpose.

    The purpose of peer review is to insure that--

[[Page 79289]]

    (a) Those activities supported by the National Institute on 
Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) 
are of the highest scientific, administrative, and technical quality; 
and
    (b) Activity results may be widely applied to appropriate target 
populations and rehabilitation problems.


Sec.  1330.21  Peer review process.

    (a) The Director refers each application for an award governed by 
those regulations in this part to a peer review panel established by 
the Director.
    (b) Peer review panels review applications on the basis of the 
applicable selection criteria in Sec.  1330.24.


Sec.  1330.22  Composition of peer review panel.

    (a) The Director selects as members of a peer review panel 
scientists and other experts in disability, independent living, 
rehabilitation or related fields who are qualified, on the basis of 
training, knowledge, or experience, to give expert advice on the merit 
of the applications under review.
    (b) The scientific peer review process shall be conducted by 
individuals who are not Department of Health and Human Services 
employees.
    (c) In selecting members to serve on a peer review panel, the 
Director may take into account the following factors:
    (1) The level of formal scientific or technical education completed 
by potential panel members.
    (2) The extent to which potential panel members have engaged in 
scientific, technical, or administrative activities appropriate to the 
category of applications that the panel will consider; the roles of 
potential panel members in those activities; and the quality of those 
activities.
    (3) The recognition received by potential panel members as 
reflected by awards and other honors from scientific and professional 
agencies and organizations outside the Department.
    (4) Whether the panel includes knowledgeable individuals with 
disabilities, or parents, family members, guardians, advocates, or 
authorized representatives of individuals with disabilities.
    (5) Whether the panel includes individuals from diverse 
populations.


Sec.  1330.23  Evaluation process.

    (a) The Director selects one or more of the selection criteria in 
Sec.  1330.24 to evaluate an application;
    (1) The Director establishes selection criteria based on statutory 
provisions that apply to the Program which may include, but are not 
limited to--
    (A) Specific statutory selection criteria;
    (B) Allowable activities;
    (C) Application content requirements; or
    (D) Other pre-award and post-award conditions; or
    (2) The Director may use a combination of selection criteria 
established under paragraph (a)(1) of this section and selection 
criteria from Sec.  1330.24 to evaluate a competition.
    (3) For Field-Initiated Projects, the Director does not consider 
Sec.  1330.24(b) (Responsiveness to the Absolute or Competitive 
Priority) in evaluating an application.
    (b) In considering selection criteria in Sec.  1330.24, the 
Director selects one or more of the factors listed in the criteria, but 
always considers the factor in Sec.  1330.24(n) regarding members of 
groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, 
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
    (c) The maximum possible score for an application is 100 points.
    (d) In the application package or a notice published in the Federal 
Register, the Director informs applicants of--
    (1) The selection criteria chosen and the maximum possible score 
for each of the selection criteria; and
    (2) The factors selected for considering the selection criteria and 
if points are assigned to each factor, the maximum possible score for 
each factor under each criterion. If no points are assigned to each 
factor, the Director evaluates each factor equally.
    (e) For all instances in which the Director chooses to allow field-
initiated research and development, the selection criteria in Sec.  
1330.25 will apply, including the requirement that the applicant must 
achieve a score of 80 percent or more of maximum possible points.


Sec.  1330.24  Selection criteria.

    In addition to criteria established under Sec.  1330.23(a)(1), the 
Director may select one or more of the following criteria in evaluating 
an application:
    (a) Importance of the problem. In determining the importance of the 
problem, the Director considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the applicant clearly describes the need 
and target population.
    (2) The extent to which the proposed activities further the 
purposes of the Act.
    (3) The extent to which the proposed activities address a 
significant need of individuals with disabilities.
    (4) The extent to which the proposed activities address a 
significant need of rehabilitation service providers.
    (5) The extent to which the proposed activities address a 
significant need of those who provide services to individuals with 
disabilities.
    (6) The extent to which the applicant proposes to provide training 
in a rehabilitation discipline or area of study in which there is a 
shortage of qualified researchers, or to a trainee population in which 
there is a need for more qualified researchers.
    (7) The extent to which the proposed project will have beneficial 
impact on the target population.
    (b) Responsiveness to an absolute or competitive priority. In 
determining the application's responsiveness to the application package 
or the absolute or competitive priority published in the Federal 
Register, the Director considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the applicant addresses all requirements of 
the absolute or competitive priority.
    (2) The extent to which the applicant's proposed activities are 
likely to achieve the purposes of the absolute or competitive priority.
    (c) Design of research activities. In determining the extent to 
which the design is likely to be effective in accomplishing the 
objectives of the project, the Director considers one or more of the 
following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the research activities constitute a 
coherent, sustained approach to research in the field, including a 
substantial addition to the state-of-the-art.
    (2) The extent to which the methodology of each proposed research 
activity is meritorious, including consideration of the extent to 
which--
    (i) The proposed design includes a comprehensive and informed 
review of the current literature, demonstrating knowledge of the state-
of-the-art;
    (ii) Each research hypothesis or research question, as appropriate, 
is theoretically sound and based on current knowledge;
    (iii) Each sample is drawn from an appropriate, specified 
population and is of sufficient size to address the proposed hypotheses 
or research questions, as appropriate, and to support the proposed data 
analysis methods;
    (iv) The source or sources of the data and the data collection 
methods are appropriate to address the proposed hypotheses or research 
questions and to

[[Page 79290]]

support the proposed data analysis methods;
    (v) The data analysis methods are appropriate;
    (vi) Implementation of the proposed research design is feasible, 
given the current state of the science and the time and resources 
available;
    (vii) Input of individuals with disabilities and other key 
stakeholders is used to shape the proposed research activities; and
    (viii) The applicant identifies and justifies the stage of research 
being proposed and the research methods associated with the stage.
    (3) The extent to which anticipated research results are likely to 
satisfy the original hypotheses or answer the original research 
questions, as appropriate, and could be used for planning additional 
research, including generation of new hypotheses or research questions, 
where applicable.
    (4) The extent to which the stage of research is identified and 
justified in the description of the research project(s) being proposed.
    (d) Design of development activities. In determining the extent to 
which the project design is likely to be effective in accomplishing 
project objectives, the Secretary considers one or more of the 
following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed project identifies a 
significant need and a well-defined target population for the new or 
improved product;
    (2) The extent to which the proposed project methodology is 
meritorious, including consideration of the extent to which--
    (i) The proposed project shows awareness of the state-of-the-art 
for current, related products;
    (ii) The proposed project employs appropriate concepts, components, 
or systems to develop the new or improved product;
    (iii) The proposed project employs appropriate samples in tests, 
trials, and other development activities.
    (iv) The proposed project conducts development activities in 
appropriate environment(s);
    (v) Input from individuals with disabilities and other key 
stakeholders is obtained to establish and guide proposed development 
activities; and
    (vi) The applicant identifies and justifies the stage(s) of 
development for the proposed project; and activities associated with 
each stage.
    (3) The new device or technique will be developed and tested in an 
appropriate environment;
    (e) Design of demonstration activities. In determining the extent 
to which the design of demonstration activities is likely to be 
effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Director 
considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities build 
on previous research, testing, or practices.
    (2) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities 
include the use of proper methodological tools and theoretically sound 
procedures to determine the effectiveness of the strategy or approach.
    (3) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities 
include innovative and effective strategies or approaches.
    (4) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities are 
likely to contribute to current knowledge and practice and be a 
substantial addition to the state-of-the-art.
    (5) The extent to which the proposed demonstration activities can 
be applied and replicated in other settings.
    (f) Design of training activities. In determining the extent to 
which the design is likely to be effective in accomplishing the 
objectives of the project, the Director considers one or more of the 
following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the proposed training materials are likely 
to be effective, including consideration of their quality, clarity, and 
variety.
    (2) The extent to which the proposed training methods are of 
sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.
    (3) The extent to which the proposed training content--
    (i) Covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject matter; and
    (ii) If relevant, is based on new knowledge derived from research 
activities of the proposed project.
    (4) The extent to which the proposed training materials, methods, 
and content are appropriate to the trainees, including consideration of 
the skill level of the trainees and the subject matter of the 
materials.
    (5) The extent to which the proposed training materials and methods 
are accessible to individuals with disabilities.
    (6) The extent to which the applicant's proposed recruitment 
program is likely to be effective in recruiting highly qualified 
trainees, including those who are individuals with disabilities.
    (7) The extent to which the applicant is able to carry out the 
training activities, either directly or through another entity.
    (8) The extent to which the proposed didactic and classroom 
training programs emphasize scientific methodology and are likely to 
develop highly qualified researchers.
    (9) The extent to which the quality and extent of the academic 
mentorship, guidance, and supervision to be provided to each individual 
trainee are of a high level and are likely to develop highly qualified 
researchers.
    (10) The extent to which the type, extent, and quality of the 
proposed research experience, including the opportunity to participate 
in advanced-level research, are likely to develop highly qualified 
researchers.
    (11) The extent to which the opportunities for collegial and 
collaborative activities, exposure to outstanding scientists in the 
field, and opportunities to participate in the preparation of scholarly 
or scientific publications and presentations are extensive and 
appropriate.
    (g) Design of dissemination activities. In determining the extent 
to which the design is likely to be effective in accomplishing the 
objectives of the project, the Director considers one or more of the 
following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the content of the information to be 
disseminated--
    (i) Covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject matter; and
    (ii) If appropriate, is based on new knowledge derived from 
research activities of the project.
    (2) The extent to which the materials to be disseminated are likely 
to be effective and usable, including consideration of their quality, 
clarity, variety, and format.
    (3) The extent to which the methods for dissemination are of 
sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.
    (4) The extent to which the materials and information to be 
disseminated and the methods for dissemination are appropriate to the 
target population, including consideration of the familiarity of the 
target population with the subject matter, format of the information, 
and subject matter.
    (5) The extent to which the information to be disseminated will be 
accessible to individuals with disabilities.
    (h) Design of utilization activities. In determining the extent to 
which the design of utilization activities is likely to be effective in 
accomplishing the objectives of the project, the Director considers one 
or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the potential new users of the information 
or technology have a practical use for the information and are likely 
to adopt the practices or use the information or technology, including 
new devices.
    (2) The extent to which the utilization strategies are likely to be 
effective.

[[Page 79291]]

    (3) The extent to which the information or technology is likely to 
be of use in other settings.
    (i) Design of technical assistance activities. In determining the 
extent to which the design of technical assistance activities is likely 
to be effective in accomplishing the objectives of the project, the 
Director considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the methods for providing technical 
assistance are of sufficient quality, intensity, and duration.
    (2) The extent to which the information to be provided through 
technical assistance covers all of the relevant aspects of the subject 
matter.
    (3) The extent to which the technical assistance is appropriate to 
the target population, including consideration of the knowledge level 
of the target population, needs of the target population, and format 
for providing information.
    (4) The extent to which the technical assistance is accessible to 
individuals with disabilities.
    (j) Plan of operation. In determining the quality of the plan of 
operation, the Director considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The adequacy of the plan of operation to achieve the objectives 
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly 
defined responsibilities, and timelines for accomplishing project 
tasks.
    (2) The adequacy of the plan of operation to provide for using 
resources, equipment, and personnel to achieve each objective.
    (k) Collaboration. In determining the quality of collaboration, the 
Director considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the applicant's proposed collaboration with 
one or more agencies, organizations, or institutions is likely to be 
effective in achieving the relevant proposed activities of the project.
    (2) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions 
demonstrate a commitment to collaborate with the applicant.
    (3) The extent to which agencies, organizations, or institutions 
that commit to collaborate with the applicant have the capacity to 
carry out collaborative activities.
    (l) Adequacy and reasonableness of the budget. In determining the 
adequacy and the reasonableness of the proposed budget, the Director 
considers one or more of the following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the 
proposed project activities.
    (2) The extent to which the budget for the project, including any 
subcontracts, is adequately justified to support the proposed project 
activities.
    (3) The extent to which the applicant is of sufficient size, scope, 
and quality to effectively carry out the activities in an efficient 
manner.
    (m) Plan of evaluation. In determining the quality of the plan of 
evaluation, the Director considers one or more of the following 
factors:
    (1) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of progress toward--
    (i) Implementing the plan of operation; and
    (ii) Achieving the project's intended outcomes and expected 
impacts.
    (2) The extent to which the plan of evaluation will be used to 
improve the performance of the project through the feedback generated 
by its periodic assessments.
    (3) The extent to which the plan of evaluation provides for 
periodic assessment of a project's progress that is based on identified 
performance measures that--
    (i) Are clearly related to the intended outcomes of the project and 
expected impacts on the target population; and
    (ii) Are objective, and quantifiable or qualitative, as 
appropriate.
    (n) Project staff. In determining the quality of the project staff, 
the Director considers the extent to which the applicant encourages 
applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that 
have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national 
origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Director considers 
one or more of the following:
    (1) The extent to which the key personnel and other key staff have 
appropriate training and experience in disciplines required to conduct 
all proposed activities.
    (2) The extent to which the commitment of staff time is adequate to 
accomplish all the proposed activities of the project.
    (3) The extent to which the key personnel are knowledgeable about 
the methodology and literature of pertinent subject areas.
    (4) The extent to which the project staff includes outstanding 
scientists in the field.
    (5) The extent to which key personnel have up-to-date knowledge 
from research or effective practice in the subject area covered in the 
priority.
    (o) Adequacy and accessibility of resources. In determining the 
adequacy and accessibility of the applicant's resources to implement 
the proposed project, the Director considers one or more of the 
following factors:
    (1) The extent to which the applicant is committed to provide 
adequate facilities, equipment, other resources, including 
administrative support, and laboratories, if appropriate.
    (2) The quality of an applicant's past performance in carrying out 
a grant.
    (3) The extent to which the applicant has appropriate access to 
populations and organizations representing individuals with 
disabilities to support advanced disability, independent living and 
clinical rehabilitation research.
    (4) The extent to which the facilities, equipment, and other 
resources are appropriately accessible to individuals with disabilities 
who may use the facilities, equipment, and other resources of the 
project.


Sec.  1330.25  Additional considerations for field-initiated 
priorities.

    (a) The Director reserves funds to support field-initiated 
applications funded under this part when those applications have been 
awarded points totaling 80 percent or more of the maximum possible 
points under the procedures described in Sec.  1330.23.
    (b) In making a final selection from applications received when 
NIDILRR uses field-initiated priorities, the Director may consider 
whether one of the following conditions is met and, if so, use this 
information to fund an application out of rank order:
    (1) The proposed project represents a unique opportunity to advance 
rehabilitation and other knowledge to improve the lives of individual 
with disabilities.
    (2) The proposed project complements or balances research activity 
already planned or funded by NIDILRR through its annual priorities or 
addresses the research in a new and promising way.

Subpart D--Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation 
Research Fellowships


Sec.  1330.30  Fellows program.

    (a) The purpose of this program is to build research capacity by 
providing support to highly qualified individuals, including those who 
are individuals with disabilities, to perform research on 
rehabilitation, independent living, and other experiences and outcomes 
of individuals with disabilities.
    (b) The eligibility requirements for the Fellows program are as 
follows:
    (1) Only individuals are eligible to be recipients of Fellowships.
    (2) Any individual is eligible for assistance under this program 
who has

[[Page 79292]]

training and experience that indicate a potential for engaging in 
scientific research related to rehabilitation and independent living 
for individuals with disabilities.
    (3) This program provides two categories of Fellowships: Merit 
Fellowships and Distinguished Fellowships.
    (i) To be eligible for a Distinguished Fellowship, an individual 
must have seven or more years of research experience in subject areas, 
methods, or techniques relevant to disability and rehabilitation 
research and must have a doctorate, other terminal degree, or 
comparable academic qualifications.
    (ii) The Director awards Merit Fellowships to individuals in 
earlier stages of their careers in research. To be eligible for a Merit 
Fellowship, an individual must have either advanced professional 
training or experience in independent study in an area which is 
directly pertinent to disability and rehabilitation.
    (c) Fellowships will be awarded in the form of a grant to eligible 
individuals.
    (d) In making a final selection of applicants to support under this 
program, the Director considers the extent to which applicants present 
a unique opportunity to effect a major advance in knowledge, address 
critical problems in innovative ways, present proposals which are 
consistent with the Institute's Long-Range Plan, build research 
capacity within the field, or complement and significantly increases 
the potential value of already planned research and related activities.

Subpart E--Special Projects and Demonstrations for Spinal Cord 
Injuries


Sec.  1330.40  Spinal cord injuries program.

    (a) This program provides assistance to establish innovative 
projects for the delivery, demonstration, and evaluation of 
comprehensive medical, vocational, independent living, and 
rehabilitation services to meet the wide range of needs of individuals 
with spinal cord injuries.
    (b) The agencies and organizations eligible to apply under this 
program are described in 45 CFR 1330.2.

[FR Doc. 2015-31907 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P